Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Mol Aspects Med. 2017 Feb 13;55:110–117. doi: 10.1016/j.mam.2017.02.001

Long-term consequences of disrupting adenosine signaling during embryonic development

Scott A Rivkees 1, Christopher C Wendler 1,1
PMCID: PMC5487283  NIHMSID: NIHMS854168  PMID: 28202385

Abstract

There is growing evidence that disruption in the prenatal environment can have long-lasting effects on an individual’s health in adulthood. Research on the fetal programming of adult diseases, including cardiovascular disease, focuses on epi-mutations, which alter the normal pattern of epigenetic factors such as DNA methylation, miRNA expression, or chromatin modification, rather than traditional genetic alteration. Thus, understanding how in utero chemical exposures alter epigenetics and lead to adult disease is of considerable public health concern.

Few signaling molecules have the potential to influence the developing mammal as the nucleoside adenosine. Adenosine levels increase rapidly with tissue hypoxia and inflammation. Adenosine antagonists including the methlyxanthines caffeine and theophylline are widely consumed during pregnancy. The receptors that transduce adenosine action are the A1, A2a, A2b, and A3 adenosine receptors (ARs). We examined the long-term effects of in utero disruption of adenosine signaling on cardiac gene expression, morphology, and function in adult offspring.

One substance that fetuses are frequently exposed to is caffeine, which is a non-selective adenosine receptor antagonist. Over the past several years, we examined the role of adenosine signaling during embryogenesis and cardiac development. We discovered that in utero alteration in adenosine action leads to adverse effects on embryonic and adult murine hearts. We find that cardiac A1ARs protect the embryo from in utero hypoxic stress, a condition that causes an increase in adenosine levels. After birth in mice, we observed that in utero caffeine exposure leads to abnormal cardiac function and morphology in adults, including an impaired response to β-adrenergic stimulation. Recently, we observed that in utero caffeine exposure induces transgenerational effects on cardiac morphology, function, and gene expression.

Our findings indicate that the effects of altered adenosine signaling are dependent on signaling through the A1ARs and timing of disruption. In addition, the long-term effects of altered adenosine signaling appear to be mediated by alterations in DNA methylation, an epigenetic process critical for normal development.

Keywords: cardiac, cardiomyopathy, heart disease, transgenerational, caffeine Classification: Biological Sciences, Developmental Biology

1. Fetal Programming of Adult Disease

It is well recognized that disruption of the intrauterine environment by nutritional or chemical factors may influence the fetus, resulting in long-term adverse effects after birth and into adulthood14. By disrupting normal prenatal development, environmental factors and chemical exposures lead to the fetal programming of adult disease, including cardiovascular disease57. The timing of the in utero insult is important and can affect the outcomes in adulthood7.

Fetal programming of adult disease involves several potential mechanisms, including genetic and non-genetic events. Non-genetic factors include influences on cell division8, while genetic factors include epigenetic influences on gene activity and expression913. Epigenetic changes not only affect the exposed embryo, but may also affect subsequent generations and contribute to the development of disease, as shown by endocrine disruptors vinclozolin and bisphenol A14, 15. Research in our laboratory has demonstrated that in utero caffeine exposure disrupts adenosine action and leads to long-term adverse effects on cardiac function1618. Furthermore, depending on the timing of exposure, caffeine has transgenerational effects on cardiac function16.

2. Adenosine

Adenosine consists of an adenine group attached to a ribose moiety. Adenosine is present in all cells and is a component of nucleic acids and energy-carrying molecules19, 20. Adenosine can be directly released from the cell or generated extracellularly21.

It is likely that several different humoral agents can transduce environmental effects on the embryo and developing fetus. However, adenosine is particularly attractive to study for several reasons. First, adenosine levels are dynamically regulated and increase markedly with tissue hypoxia and energy depletion22. Adenosine receptors may play an important role in sensing disruptions in the intrauterine environment, as it is present in all cells and is a component of nucleic acids and energy-carrying molecules19, 20. For example, under basal conditions the interstitial adenosine levels are 1–50 nM, but these levels rapidly rise to more than 1 μM with tissue ischemia, hypoxia, or inflammation20, 23.

Adenosine and adenosine receptors influence a number of cellular processes, as well. For example, adenosine receptors activate transcription factors, e.g. NF-κB that in turn activates pro-inflammatory molecules24. Adenosine also plays a role in regulating cellular events by influencing the expression of the transcription factor Hypoxia Inducible Factor (HIF-1)24.

3. Adenosine Receptors

Fluctuations in adenosine levels are sensed by transmembrane receptors that transduce adenosine’s biological effects. There are two major classes of purine receptors – P1 and P225, 26. ATP and ADP bind to P2 purine receptors that include P2Y purine metabotropic receptors that couple with G-proteins26. P2 receptors also include the P2X receptors that are ion channels26.

Adenosine receptors (ARs) are P1 purine receptors25, 27, 28. Similar to other G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), adenosine receptors contain seven putative transmembrane (TM) spanning domains25, 27, 28. Adenosine receptors were initially cloned as orphan receptors29. The identities of the genes encoding the A2a, A1, A2b, and A3 adenosine receptors were subsequently established in sequential order3035.

A1 and A3ARs activate Gi/o protein which inhibits adenylyl cyclase and leads to decreased levels of cAMP27. Alternatively, A2a and A2bARs activate Gs protein which stimulates adenylyl cyclase and leads to increased levels of cAMP27. In addition, A1ARs activate phospholipase C, and open ion channels such as calcium channels27.

Each adenosine receptor subtype has a different pattern of tissue expression and ligand binding properties. In cell-based systems, A1ARs have the highest affinity for adenosine (Ki 10 nM)25, 27, 28. The Ki values for adenosine for the A2a, A2b and A3 adenosine receptors are 200, 2000, and 10,000 nM, respectively, for the human receptors25, 27, 28. A3ARs are also activated by the adenosine metabolite inosine (Ki 2300 nM)25, 27, 28. Methylxanthines, including caffeine and theophylline, are nonselective adenosine receptor antagonists found in commonly consumed beverages including coffee and tea36.

Highest levels of A1AR gene expression are detected in adult brain, fat, and testis34. Less prominent A1AR expression is seen in the heart and kidneys34. A2aAR gene expression is seen in brain, heart, and lung33. A2bAR mRNA expression is highest in colon and bladder37. A2bARs expression is also high in retina38. A3AR is expressed in testis, heart, and retina35. For A1 and A2aARs, the levels of gene and binding site expression are proportional, but for A3ARs gene expression is much greater than binding site expression39.

In the brain, A2aARs are expressed in several brain regions, and heavy expression is seen in the striatum on cells expressing D2 dopamine receptors, an observation that dates back two decades33. A2bAR expression is localized to the pars tuberalis region of the hypophysis32, 37. Functional studies have suggested the presence of A3ARs in the central nervous system40. A1ARs are among the most widespread GPCRs in the brain. In comparison with the relatively discrete expression of other receptor subtypes, A1AR expression is at high level throughout the brain34, 41.

In the heart, A1AR expression is present in atria and ventricles, and atrial A1AR expression is greater than that seen in the ventricles42. A2aARs are present in coronary vessels in endothelial cells, smooth muscle cells of blood vessels and on myocytes43. A3ARs are present in myocardial tissue, although at low levels35. A2bARs are present on endothelial cells, smooth muscles cells and fibroblasts44. Adenosine receptors are thus localized at sites to modulate cardiovascular system function.

4. A1ARs Protect the Embryo from Hypoxic Stress

A1ARs are the earliest expressed adenosine receptors in the fetal heart42, and we demonstrated that cardiac A1AR expression protects the embryo from hypoxic insults45, 46. It is likely that other adenosine receptor subtypes play important and possibly protective roles during development, however we have focused on the role of A1ARs in this report.

Because adenosine and A1ARs mediate adverse effects of hypoxia on the developing postnatal mammalian brain and lung47, we anticipated that blockade of adenosine action would protect embryos from hypoxia47. To our surprise, we observed that adenosine acting through A1ARs exerts dramatic protective effects during mammalian embryogenesis in response to hypoxic insults45, 46.

Using a global A1AR knockout mouse model, we observed normal embryogenesis under normoxic conditions46. However, embryos lacking A1ARs were significantly more growth retarded under hypoxic conditions compared to embryos expressing A1ARs46. These data show that adenosine acting via A1ARs play an important role in protecting the embryo from hypoxia.

After E10.0 in mice, the embryo is dependent on the fetal heart for adequate nutrient delivery23. Many developmental processes occur in the heart before this critical stage. The first evident assembly of the myocardial plate on either side of the neural tube begins at embryonic (E) day 7.0 in the mouse48. The two primitive heart fields on either side of the neural tube then migrate towards the midline ventrally at E8.0 and fuse to form the single heart tube48. The tubular heart begins to contract at E8.5 followed shortly thereafter by looping to the right48. Cardiac cushion formation, which is the first step valve development, begins at E9.548. Valve formation and septation into the four chambered heart is completed by E12.5 and further development is primarily concerned with increasing the size of the heart48.

Thus, to test if adenosine confers embryo protective effects by acting at the heart, mice that lack A1ARs only in the heart were developed45. Remarkably, we observed that embryos lacking cardiac A1ARs had reduced survival and more severe growth retardation in hypoxia compared with littermates expressing A1ARs45.

These observations show that adenosine plays a key role in protecting the embryo against intrauterine stress, and adenosine exerts protective effects through A1ARs expressed in the heart. It is likely that adenosine action on embryonic cardiac function plays a major role in embryonic responses to intrauterine stress.

5. Caffeine

One of the most common chemicals that fetuses are exposed to is caffeine, which is a non-selective adenosine receptor antagonist49, 50. Cola drinks contain 35–60 mg of caffeine per 12 oz. can and a cup of regular coffee contains 100–150 mg of caffeine51. Caffeine is also present in chocolate, chocolate milk, gum, beef jerky, energy drinks, as well as other prepared foods such as coffee-flavored yogurts52. Average caffeine intake is between 150 and 200 mg per day among women of child bearing age53.

Caffeine consumption during the first month of pregnancy is reported by 60% of women, many of whom are at a stage when they do not know they are pregnant53. Caffeine consumption is associated with low birth weight and increased rates of spontaneous abortions5462. A recent Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study (MoBa) involving 59,123 pregnant women in Norway strongly supports the notion that caffeine consumption is associated with decreased birth weight, even at levels below recommended limits61. The idea that prenatal caffeine exposure is associated with low birth weight and leads to other adverse effects is not accepted by all53, 63. However, prenatal caffeine exposure is concerning enough that Nordic countries and the United States recommend that pregnant women limit their caffeine intake to less than 200 mg per day64, 65.

Caffeine readily crosses the placenta to reach the fetus, where the half-life of caffeine is longer (12–24 hrs) than adults (2–4 hrs) due to the absence of the metabolic enzyme CYP1A2 in placenta and fetus50. In the embryo, caffeine influences cardiac gene expression and cardiac function6668.

In addition, caffeine exerts many cellular effects, including influences on intracellular calcium levels and inhibition of phosphodiesterase36. Yet, with serum concentrations observed with human consumption, the physiological effects of caffeine are due to antagonism of adenosine receptors through competitive inhibition49, 50.

6. Influences of Epigenetics on Embryonic Development

Epigenetic processes cause heritable changes in gene expression without altering the DNA sequence69. Epigenetic processes, including histone modification, DNA methylation, and microRNA (miRNA), play important roles in embryogenesis and disease susceptibility69. Increasing evidence demonstrates that epigenetic mechanisms are linked to gene activation, gene silencing and chromosomal instability9, 10, 7072. Physiological epigenetic processes act in cell-specific and temporally regulated manners to influence normal development, tissue formation, differentiation, and aging10, 12, 13. Epigenetics also plays a critical role in the fetal programming of adult disease3, 69, 73, 74.

DNA methylation is the process of adding a methyl group to a cytosine base in DNA to form 5-methylcytosine (5mC), and in mammals this event occurs at symmetric CG sites75. DNA methylation patterns are established and maintained by DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs)75. DNMT1 is associated with maintaining methylation patterns, as it primarily methylates hemimethylated DNA75. DNMT3a and 3b primarily methylate unmethylated DNA, which is consistent with their role in de novo DNA methylation75, 76. DNA methylation inhibits gene expression through suppressing transcription factor binding or recruiting histone deacetylases that cause chromatin condensation76. Importantly, altered DNA methylation patterns can be stably inherited during DNA replication and mediate persistent toxicological consequences in subsequent cellular and whole animal generations75.

Members of the ten-eleven translocation (TET) family of proteins are 5mC dioxygenases that catalyze the conversion of 5mC to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC)77. These enzymes regulate DNA demethylation, since 5hmC is more sensitive than 5mC to deamination and to base-excision repair77, 78.

Alterations in DNA methylation is a recognized mechanism for transmitting in utero environmental stress into an increased risk for adult disease27. After fertilization, genomic DNA in the inner cell mass undergoes a rapid wave of demethylation of the genomic DNA75, 79, 80. DNA methylation patterns are re-established during embryogenesis from E3.5 to E9.5 in mice, and these patterns can be altered by nutritional and environmental factors resulting in long-lasting effects75, 8183. During cellular differentiation, lineage-specific DNA methylation patterns undergo further remodeling84.

Primordial germ cells (PGCs) in mice also go through specific DNA methylation remodeling events during embryogenesis85. PGCs begin to migrate along the developing hindgut at E8.5 to the genital ridges85. During and after this migration (E10.5–12.5), PGC DNA actively undergoes a wave of demethylation. This erasure process is important for removing genomic imprints from the previous generation85, 86. These normal epigenetic processes can be affected by the intrauterine environment, including chemicals that alter DNA methylation in primordial germ cells and are correlated with adult diseases14, 15, 8791. In a report that indicates that in utero caffeine exposure can have long-term effects on PGCs, it was observed in rats that maternal caffeine consumption during gestation affected the fertility of adult male offspring92.

Another epigenetic process that may be influenced by alterations in the intrauterine environment includes miRNA expression. miRNAs are small 22 nucleotides long non-coding RNAs that reduce gene expression either by promoting mRNA degradation or inhibiting translation of target genes93. miRNAs influence development by regulating cell proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis93.

7. Effects of Caffeine on the Embryo

Because caffeine is widely consumed, potential effects of caffeine on the developing fetus have been examined in animals and humans53.

In rats, teratogenic effects of caffeine on the fetal heart are observed at doses in excess of 50 mg/kg94. The most common cardiovascular malformations are ventricular defects95. Cardiac morphogenesis has been found to be impaired in embryos from mothers treated with both ethanol and caffeine96, showing that caffeine can amplify effects of other toxins. Caffeine administered to pregnant CD-1 mice led to a decrease in embryonic crown-rump lengths at E18.597. Caffeine induced decreased embryonic growth was accompanied with decrease embryonic carotid artery flow and decreased expression of A2AR97. In addition, caffeine inhibits the fetal cardiac output recovery following maternal hypoxia exposure, again indicated that caffeine and amplify other environmental factors97.

Considering the above, we tested if caffeine exerts effects on the embryo similar to that seen when A1ARs are deleted17. Pregnant mice in room air or hypoxia were treated with a single dose of caffeine at E8.5 resulting in circulating concentrations in the dam equivalent to those seen with two cups of coffee50. The time of exposure was equivalent to 20–30 days of human gestation, a time when many women are not aware that they are pregnant.

Caffeine exposure was associated with reduced fetal viability17. When embryo size was assessed, the caffeine treated embryos were smaller compared to vehicle-treated embryos17. When cardiac histology was examined, caffeine resulted in reduced ventricular myocardial area and reduced HIF-1α protein expression in hypoxia17.

Further analysis of caffeine effects on embryonic hearts revealed that caffeine had no effect on heart rate at E9.5, but induced increased heart rates in E12.5 hearts67. These caffeine effects on embryonic heart rates are similar to those seen with specific antagonism of A1ARs by 1,3-dipropyl-8-cyclopentylxanthine (DPCPX)68. In addition, caffeine was able to abolish (E9.5) or blunt (E12.5) hypoxia-induced bradycardia in embryonic mice hearts67. These data indicate that caffeine can directly influence embryonic heart function.

Caffeine also influences gene expression in the developing heart. We examined the effects of in utero caffeine exposure on cardiac gene expression. After treatment from E6.5–10.5, total RNA was isolated from E10.5 embryonic ventricles and used for qPCR analysis. Significant differences in gene expression were observed in ventricular tissue following caffeine treatment, including structural cardiac genes (Myh6, Myh7, Myh7b, Tnni3), transcription factors (Nfatc1, Mef2c,d, Gata4), and miRNAs (miR208a, mir208b, miR499; Fig. 1)66. Because we observed decreased levels of DNA methylation in adult hearts after in utero caffeine exposure16, we examined the effects of caffeine exposure on the expression of important DNA methylation enzymes in the embryonic heart. Caffeine exposure (20 mg/kg) from E6.5–10.5 coincides with the remethylation of embryonic DNA that follows a massive wave of demethylation that occurs after fertilization85. In utero exposure to caffeine during this developmental window leads to reduced expression of several genes that are involved in regulating DNA methylation levels, including DNA methyltransferases (Dnmt1, Dnmt3a, and Dnmt3b) and Tet genes (Tet1, Tet2, and Tet3; Fig. 1)66.

Figure 1. Altered gene and miRNA expression in embryonic hearts exposed to in utero caffeine.

Figure 1

Caffeine treatment of pregnant dams from E6.5–10.5 altered the expression of important cardiac genes in embryonic hearts at E10.5. In utero caffeine treatment altered expression of cardiac transcription factors, structural genes, DNA methylation enzymes, and miRNAs. Bars ± SEM represent fold changes normalized to β-actin or snRNA RNU6-2 and relative to individual controls (n=5–7, ** P<0.01, *** P<0.001 vs. vehicle).

In addition, a broader examination of the effects of in utero caffeine exposure on embryonic cardiac gene expression, through the use of RNAseq, revealed over 900 genes had altered expression after caffeine exposure66. Pathway analysis of these genes revealed that caffeine alters the expression of many genes involved with cardiac hypertrophy and heart development66. RNA-seq data also revealed the DNA methylation, histone modification, and alternative gene splicing pathways were also compromised by caffeine treatment66. These data indicate that caffeine exposure influences epigenetic pathways during development that may explain the long-term effects that we observe with in utero exposure.

In contrast to animal studies, major teratogenic effects of caffeine have not been found in humans94. Few studies, though, have evaluated effects of caffeine consumption during early embryogenesis53, 94. Caffeine consumption is associated with low birth weight and increased rates of spontaneous abortions5462. While some of these effects on birth weight may be minimal and not lead to gross birth defects, we demonstrated that similar concentrations of in utero caffeine exposure have long-term effects on adult offspring of treated mice16, 17.

8. Long-Term Effects of In Utero Caffeine Exposure

Because in utero caffeine exposure had significant effects on embryonic heart function and gene expression, we examined the long-term effect of in utero caffeine exposure on adult heart function and gene expression. In addition, we examined epigenetic factors that may mediate long-term effects on the heart, including transgenerational effects.

To test for long-term effects of prenatal caffeine exposure, we examined cardiac function and morphology of adult male offspring. In the first set of experiments, pregnant dams from an inbred strain (C57Bl/6) of mice were treated with a single dose of caffeine (20 mg/kg) at E8.517. Dams were allowed to give birth, and offspring were examined at 10–12 weeks of age. Using echocardiography, we observed a decrease in % fractional shortening (%FS) and an increase in left ventricular internal diameter (LVID) in caffeine-treated hearts17.

In a second set of long-term studies, we treated pregnant A1AR global knockout mice with 20 mg/kg of caffeine at E8.5 and examined offspring at 10–12 weeks. The groups of male mice examined included caffeine- or vehicle-treated and three genotypes (A1AR+/+, A1AR+/−, A1AR−/−). Of these groups, the A1AR+/+ caffeine-treated mice had abnormal cardiac function and morphology16. Caffeine-treated adult A1AR+/+ hearts had an increase in left ventricle (LV) mass, an increase in left ventricular posterior wall (LVPW) thickness, and a decrease in cardiac output16.

In addition, we observed an altered pattern of DNA methylation in adult hearts exposed to caffeine in utero and an overall decrease in the percentage of methylated DNA16. Over 7,000 differentially methylated regions in the genome were identified when comparing caffeine vs. vehicle in A1AR+/+ mice16. Further analysis mapped these regions to genes that are associated with cardiac hypertrophy and heart disease pathways16.

In a third set of experiments, we examined the effects of in utero caffeine exposure from E6.5–E9.5 or E10.5–13.5 (20 mg/kg per day) on cardiac function and morphology in CD-1 mice, an outbred strain. This strain of mice has been demonstrated to have more severe transgenerational effects on health in adulthood than inbred strains when exposed to endocrine disruptors in utero15. We chose these exposure times because they coincide with two important DNA methylation transition events during embryogenesis, including a large scale DNA remethylation of the genome that occurs from E3.5–E9.5, and genome-wide de-methylation that occurs during primordial germ cell development from E10.5–E12.575. In these sets of experiments, we examined the F1 generation (embryos exposed in utero), F2 generation (exposed gametes within the F1 generation embryos) and F3 generation (naïve to caffeine exposure).

At 12 weeks of age, mice treated from E6.5–9.5 did not have altered cardiac function or morphology18. However, at 22 weeks after birth, F1 generation offspring of dams treated from E6.5–9.5 with caffeine had altered cardiac morphology, including increased interventricular septum (IVS) thickness during both systole and diastole, and increased left ventricle (LV) mass compared to vehicle controls18.

At one year of age, F1 generation mice exposed to caffeine in utero from E6.5–9.5 showed altered cardiac morphology, as well as altered cardiac function that was characteristic of dilated cardiomyopathy (Table 1)18. Hearts from the caffeine-treated group displayed systolic dysfunction including a decrease in the left ventricular posterior wall thickness during systole (LVPW;s) and an increase in left ventricle internal diameter during systole (LVID;s), which led to an increase in LV volume during systole (Table 1)18. These effects on cardiac morphology lead to reduced cardiac function, including a decrease in % fractional shortening (%FS) and a decrease in % ejection fraction (%EF; Table 1)18.

Table 1.

Echocardiography analysis of adult F1 generation mice exposed to caffeine or vehicle as embryos in utero from E6.5–9.518.

Treatment Generation Age IVS;d LVID;d LVPW;d LV Vol;d IVS;s LVID;s LVPW;s LV Vol;s % EF % FS LV Mass Heart Rate Weight N
E6.5–9.5
Vehicle F1 1 year 0.95 4.68 1.07 102.53 1.33 3.30 1.49 44.87 56.47 29.66 169.77 495.54 62.13 4
Caffeine F1 1 year 0.96 4.94 1.06 115.91 1.30 3.70 1.32 59.77 48.89 25.28 183.34 469.46 59.36 4
P-value 0.45 0.11 0.42 0.12 0.35 0.04 0.03 0.04 0.02 0.02 0.26 0.18 0.34
E10.5–13.5
Vehicle F2 1 year 0.92 5.00 1.00 118.72 1.29 3.66 1.34 57.24 52.09 26.89 173.76 523.84 60.10 5
Caffeine F2 1 year 0.89 4.75 1.11 105.32 1.25 3.32 1.50 45.54 57.01 30.07 169.31 526.52 59.62 7
P-value 0.22 0.03 0.00 0.03 0.24 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.04 0.33 0.44 0.47

IVS, interventricular septum; LVID, left ventricle internal diameter; LVPW, left ventricular posterior wall; LV, left ventricle; FS, fraction shortening; Vol, volume; EF, ejection fraction; d, diastole; s, systole. Units: IVS, LVID, LVPW are measured in millimeters (mm); LV vol is measured in milliliters (ml); LV mass is measured in milligrams (mg). P-values were calculated by Student’s t-test.

Indicating that the timing of caffeine exposure is critical for the observed effects on cardiac function and morphology, F1 adult offspring of dams exposed to caffeine from E10.5–13.5 did not display adverse effects on cardiac morphology or function in adulthood at 22 weeks or at 1 year of age18.

Although caffeine exposure from E10.5–13.5 has no effect on adult hearts in the F1 generation at 22 weeks or 1 year, we did observe changes in the F2 generation18. At 1 year of age, the F2 caffeine-treated group exhibited significant changes in cardiac morphology including decreased LVID, decreased LV volume and increased LVPW thickness during both systole and diastole (Table 1)18. These changes in morphology were associated with changes in cardiac function including an increase in % FS and an increase in % EF (Table 1)18. These changes in the caffeine-treated group are similar to those seen in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with hyperdynamic function in humans98, 99.

We also examined the F3 generation offspring, which were never directly exposed to caffeine. At 22 weeks, the F3 caffeine group displayed effects on morphology including increased LVPW thickness during systole and diastole compared to controls and an increase in LV mass18. At 1 year of age, we observed that hearts of the F3 generation caffeine group had an increase in LV mass compared to controls that did not coincide with an increase in body weight18.

In addition to altered cardiac function and morphology, in utero caffeine exposure alters gene expression levels in the F1, F2, and F3 generations of mice18. The most interesting difference in gene expression observed was with the Myh7 gene. MYH7 is generally an embryonic and prenatal form of cardiac myosin that is greatly reduced in adult murine hearts, but Myh7 expression is activated in adult hearts during cardiac stress and heart failure in mice100, 101. In F1 generation mice exposed to caffeine from E6.5–9.5, we observed an increase in Myh7 expression18. The increase in Myh7 expression is indicative of the phenotype induced by caffeine as increased Myh7 expression is associated with cardiomyopathy and heart failure101, 102.

In contrast, we observed that F2 generation mice exposed to in utero caffeine from E10.5–13.5 had reduced expression of Myh7. This opposite effect on Myh7 gene expression compared to the F1 generation mice exposed to caffeine from E6.5–9.5 correlates with the opposite effect that caffeine has on adult heart function in the F2 generation. These data indicate that Myh7 expression is sensitive to caffeine exposure and may be predictive of cardiac dysfunction in adult hearts (Fig. 2).

Figure 2. Timing of in utero caffeine exposure leads to different cardiac phenotypes in adult offspring.

Figure 2

The timing of in utero caffeine treatment leads to differences in adult cardiac function, gene expression, and phenotype. Exposure to caffeine from E6.5–9.5 leads the F1 generation to develop dilated cardiomyopathy with decrease % FS and increased Myh7 expression. In utero caffeine exposure from E10.5–13.5 leads to a hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in the F2 generation along with increased % FS and decreased Myh7 expression.

These data on the long-term effects of in utero caffeine exposure indicate strongly that the timing of exposure is critical to both the effects on the heart in adulthood and on which subsequent generation will be affected (Fig. 2). If exposed to caffeine early in development (E6.5–9.5) DNA methylation is altered and it leads to an increase in Myh7 expression and decreased % fractional shortening in the adult F1 generation heart, which leads to a dilated cardiomyopathy phenotype (Fig. 2). On the other hand, when exposed to caffeine later in development (E10.5–13.5) no effects are observed in the F1 generation but the F2 generation is affected. F2 hearts display a deceased expression of Myh7 and an increase in % fractional shorting, which leads to a hypertrophic cardiomyopathy phenotype in adults (Fig. 2).

9. Conclusion

These data indicate that in utero caffeine exposure has lasting effects on cardiac function and morphology in adult mice and that these effects are transmitted to subsequent generations. We demonstrate that the timing of caffeine exposure influences the generation affected and the phenotype observed. In addition, these data indicate that caffeine exposure during early embryogenesis inhibits expression of key DNA methylation enzymes and leads to long-term changes in cardiac DNA methylation patterns. These observations identify a potential mechanism by which fetal caffeine exposure mediates long-term effects on cardiac function.

Going forward, additional clinical investigation is needed to better address caffeine safety during pregnancy. Studies are needed to match known prenatal caffeine intake with long-term postnatal outcomes to determine if caffeine contributes to the programming of adult disease. As such, determining if prenatal caffeine exposure exerts epigenetic effects is needed too. Studies that better define the cellular targets of caffeine and adenosine action will also better define fundamental mechanisms that play adaptive roles in responses to hypoxia and other environmental insults.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development at the National Institutes of Health (R01 HD058086 to S. A. Rivkees and C.C. Wendler).

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.Cetin I, Mando C, Calabrese S. Maternal predictors of intrauterine growth restriction. Current opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care. 2013;16:310–319. doi: 10.1097/MCO.0b013e32835e8d9c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Gluckman PD, Cutfield W, Hofman P, Hanson MA. The fetal, neonatal, and infant environments-the long-term consequences for disease risk. Early Hum Dev. 2005;81:51–59. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2004.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Vo T, Hardy DB. Molecular mechanisms underlying the fetal programming of adult disease. Journal of cell communication and signaling. 2012;6:139–153. doi: 10.1007/s12079-012-0165-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Barker DJ. Human growth and cardiovascular disease. Nestle Nutr Workshop Ser Pediatr Program. 2008;61:21–38. doi: 10.1159/000113163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Barker DJ. Fetal origins of cardiovascular disease. Ann Med. 1999;31(Suppl 1):3–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Barker DJ. The fetal and infant origins of adult disease. BMJ. 1990;301:1111. doi: 10.1136/bmj.301.6761.1111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Gluckman PD, Hanson MA, Buklijas T, Low FM, Beedle AS. Epigenetic mechanisms that underpin metabolic and cardiovascular diseases. Nature reviews. Endocrinology. 2009;5:401–408. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2009.102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Porrello ER, Widdop RE, Delbridge LM. Early origins of cardiac hypertrophy: Does cardiomyocyte attrition programme for pathological ‘catch-up’ growth of the heart? Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2008;35:1358–1364. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1681.2008.05036.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Simmons RA. Developmental origins of diabetes: The role of epigenetic mechanisms. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2007;14:13–16. doi: 10.1097/MED.0b013e328013da5b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Jirtle RL, Skinner MK. Environmental epigenomics and disease susceptibility. Nat Rev Genet. 2007;8:253–262. doi: 10.1038/nrg2045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Simmons R. Perinatal programming of obesity. Exp Gerontol. 2005;40:863–866. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2005.09.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Callinan PA, Feinberg AP. The emerging science of epigenomics. Hum Mol Genet. 2006;15(Spec 1):R95–101. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddl095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bjornsson HT, Cui H, Gius D, Fallin MD, Feinberg AP. The new field of epigenomics: Implications for cancer and other common disease research. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 2004;69:447–456. doi: 10.1101/sqb.2004.69.447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Manikkam M, Guerrero-Bosagna C, Tracey R, Haque MM, Skinner MK. Transgenerational actions of environmental compounds on reproductive disease and identification of epigenetic biomarkers of ancestral exposures. PLoS One. 2012;7:e31901. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Guerrero-Bosagna C, Covert TR, Haque MM, Settles M, Nilsson EE, Anway MD, Skinner MK. Epigenetic transgenerational inheritance of vinclozolin induced mouse adult onset disease and associated sperm epigenome biomarkers. Reprod Toxicol. 2012;34:694–707. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2012.09.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Buscariollo DL, Fang X, Greenwood V, Xue H, Rivkees SA, Wendler CC. Embryonic caffeine exposure acts via a1 adenosine receptors to alter adult cardiac function and DNA methylation in mice. PLoS One. 2014;9:e87547. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Wendler CC, Busovsky-McNeal M, Ghatpande S, Kalinowski A, Russell KS, Rivkees SA. Embryonic caffeine exposure induces adverse effects in adulthood. FASEB J. 2009;23:1272–1278. doi: 10.1096/fj.08-124941. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Fang X, Poulsen RR, Rivkees SA, Wendler CC. In utero caffeine exposure induces transgenerational effects on the adult heart. Scientific reports. 2016;6:34106. doi: 10.1038/srep34106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Jacobson KA. Introduction to adenosine receptors as therapeutic targets. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2009:1–24. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-89615-9_1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Rivkees SA, Zhao Z, Porter G, Turner C. Influences of adenosine on the fetus and newborn. Mol Genet Metab. 2001;74:160–171. doi: 10.1006/mgme.2001.3217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Eckle T, Koeppen M, Eltzschig HK. Role of extracellular adenosine in acute lung injury. Physiology (Bethesda) 2009;24:298–306. doi: 10.1152/physiol.00022.2009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ijzerman A, van Rhee AM. Modulators of adenosine uptake, release, and inactivation. In: Jacobson KA, Jarvis MF, editors. Purinergic approaches in experimental therapeutics. New York: Wiley-Liss; 1997. pp. 129–148. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Conway SJ, Kruzynska-Frejtag A, Kneer PL, Machnicki M, Koushik SV. What cardiovascular defect does my prenatal mouse mutant have, and why? Genesis. 2003;35:1–21. doi: 10.1002/gene.10152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Eltzschig HK, Thompson LF, Karhausen J, Cotta RJ, Ibla JC, Robson SC, Colgan SP. Endogenous adenosine produced during hypoxia attenuates neutrophil accumulation: Coordination by extracellular nucleotide metabolism. Blood. 2004;104:3986–3992. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-06-2066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Fredholm BB. Adenosine receptors as drug targets. Experimental cell research. 2010;316:1284–1288. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2010.02.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Abbracchio MP, Burnstock G, Verkhratsky A, Zimmermann H. Purinergic signalling in the nervous system: An overview. Trends Neurosci. 2009;32:19–29. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2008.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Fredholm BB, AP IJ, Jacobson KA, Klotz KN, Linden J. International union of pharmacology. Xxv. Nomenclature and classification of adenosine receptors. Pharmacol Rev. 2001;53:527–552. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Fredholm BB, Arslan G, Halldner L, Kull B, Schulte G, Wasserman W. Structure and function of adenosine receptors and their genes. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2000;362:364–374. doi: 10.1007/s002100000313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Libert F, Parmentier M, Lefort A, Dinsart C, Van Sande J, Maenhaut C, Simons MJ, Dumont JE, Vassart G. Selective amplification and cloning of four new members of the g protein-coupled receptor family. Science. 1989;244:569–572. doi: 10.1126/science.2541503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Maenhaut C, Van Sande J, Libert F, Abramowicz M, Parmentier M, Vanderhaegen JJ, Dumont JE, Vassart G, Schiffmann S. Rdc8 codes for an adenosine a2 receptor with physiological constitutive activity. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1990;173:1169–1178. doi: 10.1016/s0006-291x(05)80909-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Libert F, Schiffmann SN, Lefort A, Parmentier M, Gerard C, Dumont JE, Vanderhaeghen JJ, Vassart G. The orphan receptor cdna rdc7 encodes an a1 adenosine receptor. EMBO J. 1991;10:1677–1682. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb07691.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Rivkees SA, Reppert SM. Rfl9 encodes an a2b-adenosine receptor. Mol Endocrinol. 1992;6:1598–1604. doi: 10.1210/mend.6.10.1333049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Fink JS, Weaver DR, Rivkees SA, Peterfreund RA, Pollack AE, Adler EM, Reppert SM. Molecular cloning of the rat a2 adenosine receptor: Selective co- expression with d2 dopamine receptors in rat striatum. Brain Res Mol Brain Res. 1992;14:186–195. doi: 10.1016/0169-328x(92)90173-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Reppert SM, Weaver DR, Stehle JH, Rivkees SA. Molecular cloning and characterization of a rat a1-adenosine receptor that is widely expressed in brain and spinal cord. Mol Endocrinol. 1991;5:1037–1048. doi: 10.1210/mend-5-8-1037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Zhou QY, Li C, Olah ME, Johnson RA, Stiles GL, Civelli O. Molecular cloning and characterization of an adenosine receptor: The a3 adenosine receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992;89:7432–7436. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.16.7432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Trivedi BH, Bridges AJ, Bruns RF. Structure-activty relationships of adenosine a1 and a2 receptors. In: Williams M, editor. Adenosine and adenosine receptors. Clifton: Humana Press; 1990. pp. 57–106. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Stehle JH, Rivkees SA, Lee JJ, Weaver DR, Deeds JD, Reppert SM. Molecular cloning and expression of the cdna for a novel a2- adenosine receptor subtype. Mol Endocrinol. 1992;6:384–393. doi: 10.1210/mend.6.3.1584214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Blazynski C. Characterization of adenosine a2 receptors in bovine retinal pigment epithelial membranes. Exp Eye Res. 1993;56:595–599. doi: 10.1006/exer.1993.1073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Rivkees SA, Thevananther S, Hao H. Are a3 adenosine receptors expressed in the brain? Neuroreport. 2000;11:1025–1030. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200004070-00026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Lopes LV, Rebola N, Pinheiro PC, Richardson PJ, Oliveira CR, Cunha RA. Adenosine a3 receptors are located in neurons of the rat hippocampus. Neuroreport. 2003;14:1645–1648. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200308260-00021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Swanson TH, Drazba JA, Rivkees SA. Adenosine a1 receptors are located predominantly on axons in the rat hippocampal formation. J Comp Neurol. 1995;363:517–531. doi: 10.1002/cne.903630402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Rivkees SA. The ontogeny of cardiac and neural a1 adenosine receptor expression in rats. Brain Res Dev Brain Res. 1995;89:202–213. doi: 10.1016/0165-3806(95)00120-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Olanrewaju HA, Qin W, Feoktistov I, Scemama JL, Mustafa SJ. Adenosine a(2a) and a(2b) receptors in cultured human and porcine coronary artery endothelial cells. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2000;279:H650–656. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.2000.279.2.H650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Eckle T, Faigle M, Grenz A, Laucher S, Thompson LF, Eltzschig HK. A2b adenosine receptor dampens hypoxia-induced vascular leak. Blood. 2008;111:2024–2035. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-10-117044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Wendler CC, Poulsen RR, Ghatpande S, Greene RW, Rivkees SA. Identification of the heart as the critical site of adenosine mediated embryo protection. BMC Dev Biol. 2010;10:57. doi: 10.1186/1471-213X-10-57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Wendler CC, Amatya S, McClaskey C, Ghatpande S, Fredholm BB, Rivkees SA. A1 adenosine receptors play an essential role in protecting the embryo against hypoxia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:9697–9702. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0703557104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Turner CP, Seli M, Ment L, Stewart W, Yan H, Johansson B, Fredholm BB, Blackburn M, Rivkees SA. A1 adenosine receptors mediate hypoxia-induced ventriculomegaly. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:11718–11722. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1931975100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Fishman MC, Chien KR. Fashioning the vertebrate heart: Earliest embryonic decisions. Development. 1997;124:2099–2117. doi: 10.1242/dev.124.11.2099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Fredholm BB, Battig K, Holmen J, Nehlig A, Zvartau EE. Actions of caffeine in the brain with special reference to factors that contribute to its widespread use. Pharmacol Rev. 1999;51:83–133. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Fredholm BB. Astra award lecture. Adenosine, adenosine receptors and the actions of caffeine. Pharmacol Toxicol. 1995;76:93–101. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0773.1995.tb00111.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.How much caffeine is in your daily habit? 2007 [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Rudolph E, Farbinger A, Konig J. Determination of the caffeine contents of various food items within the austrian market and validation of a caffeine assessment tool (cat) Food additives & contaminants. Part A, Chemistry, analysis, control, exposure & risk assessment. 2012;29:1849–1860. doi: 10.1080/19440049.2012.719642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Browne ML. Maternal exposure to caffeine and risk of congenital anomalies: A systematic review. Epidemiology. 2006;17:324–331. doi: 10.1097/01.ede.0000208476.36988.44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Clausson B, Granath F, Ekbom A, Lundgren S, Nordmark A, Signorello LB, Cnattingius S. Effect of caffeine exposure during pregnancy on birth weight and gestational age. Am J Epidemiol. 2002;155:429–436. doi: 10.1093/aje/155.5.429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Cnattingius S, Signorello LB, Anneren G, Clausson B, Ekbom A, Ljunger E, Blot WJ, McLaughlin JK, Petersson G, Rane A, Granath F. Caffeine intake and the risk of first-trimester spontaneous abortion. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:1839–1845. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200012213432503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Vlajinac HD, Petrovic RR, Marinkovic JM, Sipetic SB, Adanja BJ. Effect of caffeine intake during pregnancy on birth weight. Am J Epidemiol. 1997;145:335–338. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Matijasevich A, Barros FC, Santos IS, Yemini A. Maternal caffeine consumption and fetal death: A case-control study in uruguay. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2006;20:100–109. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2006.00706.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Higdon JV, Frei B. Coffee and health: A review of recent human research. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2006;46:101–123. doi: 10.1080/10408390500400009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Bech BH, Nohr EA, Vaeth M, Henriksen TB, Olsen J. Coffee and fetal death: A cohort study with prospective data. Am J Epidemiol. 2005;162:983–990. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwi317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Weng X, Odouli R, Li DK. Maternal caffeine consumption during pregnancy and the risk of miscarriage: A prospective cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.10.803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Sengpiel V, Elind E, Bacelis J, Nilsson S, Grove J, Myhre R, Haugen M, Meltzer HM, Alexander J, Jacobsson B, Brantsaeter AL. Maternal caffeine intake during pregnancy is associated with birth weight but not with gestational length: Results from a large prospective observational cohort study. BMC medicine. 2013;11:42. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-11-42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Greenwood DC, Alwan N, Boylan S, Cade JE, Charvill J, Chipps KC, Cooke MS, Dolby VA, Hay AW, Kassam S, Kirk SF, Konje JC, Potdar N, Shires S, Simpson N, Taub N, Thomas JD, Walker J, White KL, Wild CP. Caffeine intake during pregnancy, late miscarriage and stillbirth. Eur J Epidemiol. 2010;25:275–280. doi: 10.1007/s10654-010-9443-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Peck JD, Leviton A, Cowan LD. A review of the epidemiologic evidence concerning the reproductive health effects of caffeine consumption: A 2000–2009 update. Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association. 2010;48:2549–2576. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2010.06.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Volume nord 2004. 4th. 13. Copenhagen, denmark: Nordic council of ministers; 2004. Nnr project group: In nordic nutrition recommendations 2004, integrating nutrition and physical activity. 2004. [Google Scholar]
  • 65.American College of O. Gynecologists. Acog committeeopinion no. 462: Moderate caffeine consumption during pregnancy. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2010;116:467–468. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181eeb2a1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Fang X, Mei W, Barbazuk WB, Rivkees SA, Wendler CC. Caffeine exposure alters cardiac gene expression in embryonic cardiomyocytes. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2014 doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00307.2014. ajpregu 00307 02014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Buscariollo DL, Breuer GA, Wendler CC, Rivkees SA. Caffeine acts via a1 adenosine receptors to disrupt embryonic cardiac function. PLoS One. 2011;6:e28296. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Porter GA, Jr, Rivkees SA. Ontogeny of humoral heart rate regulation in the embryonic mouse. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2001;281:R401–407. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.2001.281.2.R401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Shirodkar AV, Marsden PA. Epigenetics in cardiovascular disease. Current opinion in cardiology. 2011;26:209–215. doi: 10.1097/HCO.0b013e328345986e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Sinclair KD, Lea RG, Rees WD, Young LE. The developmental origins of health and disease: Current theories and epigenetic mechanisms. Soc Reprod Fertil Suppl. 2007;64:425–443. doi: 10.5661/rdr-vi-425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Simmons RA. Developmental origins of beta-cell failure in type 2 diabetes: The role of epigenetic mechanisms. Pediatr Res. 2007;61:64R–67R. doi: 10.1203/pdr.0b013e3180457623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Santos-Reboucas CB, Pimentel MM. Implication of abnormal epigenetic patterns for human diseases. Eur J Hum Genet. 2007;15:10–17. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.O’Sullivan L, Combes AN, Moritz KM. Epigenetics and developmental programming of adult onset diseases. Pediatr Nephrol. 2012;27:2175–2182. doi: 10.1007/s00467-012-2108-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Ordovas JM, Smith CE. Epigenetics and cardiovascular disease. Nature reviews. Cardiology. 2010;7:510–519. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2010.104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.He XJ, Chen T, Zhu JK. Regulation and function of DNA methylation in plants and animals. Cell Res. 2011;21:442–465. doi: 10.1038/cr.2011.23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Szyf M. Epigenetics, DNA methylation, and chromatin modifying drugs. Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology. 2009;49:243–263. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-061008-103102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Tan L, Shi YG. Tet family proteins and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in development and disease. Development. 2012;139:1895–1902. doi: 10.1242/dev.070771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Guo JU, Su Y, Zhong C, Ming GL, Song H. Emerging roles of tet proteins and 5-hydroxymethylcytosines in active DNA demethylation and beyond. Cell Cycle. 2011;10:2662–2668. doi: 10.4161/cc.10.16.17093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Sanz LA, Kota SK, Feil R. Genome-wide DNA demethylation in mammals. Genome biology. 2010;11:110. doi: 10.1186/gb-2010-11-3-110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Weaver JR, Susiarjo M, Bartolomei MS. Imprinting and epigenetic changes in the early embryo. Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society. 2009;20:532–543. doi: 10.1007/s00335-009-9225-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Dolinoy DC, Weidman JR, Jirtle RL. Epigenetic gene regulation: Linking early developmental environment to adult disease. Reproductive toxicology. 2007;23:297–307. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2006.08.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Waterland RA, Jirtle RL. Transposable elements: Targets for early nutritional effects on epigenetic gene regulation. Molecular and cellular biology. 2003;23:5293–5300. doi: 10.1128/MCB.23.15.5293-5300.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Ho SM, Tang WY, Belmonte de Frausto J, Prins GS. Developmental exposure to estradiol and bisphenol a increases susceptibility to prostate carcinogenesis and epigenetically regulates phosphodiesterase type 4 variant 4. Cancer research. 2006;66:5624–5632. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-0516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Mohn F, Weber M, Rebhan M, Roloff TC, Richter J, Stadler MB, Bibel M, Schubeler D. Lineage-specific polycomb targets and de novo DNA methylation define restriction and potential of neuronal progenitors. Mol Cell. 2008;30:755–766. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.05.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Hajkova P. Epigenetic reprogramming in the germline: Towards the ground state of the epigenome. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011;366:2266–2273. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Trasler JM. Epigenetics in spermatogenesis. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2009;306:33–36. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2008.12.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Choudhuri S, Cui Y, Klaassen CD. Molecular targets of epigenetic regulation and effectors of environmental influences. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2010;245:378–393. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2010.03.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Heindel JJ. Role of exposure to environmental chemicals in the developmental basis of reproductive disease and dysfunction. Seminars in reproductive medicine. 2006;24:168–177. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-944423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.LeBaron MJ, Rasoulpour RJ, Klapacz J, Ellis-Hutchings RG, Hollnagel HM, Gollapudi BB. Epigenetics and chemical safety assessment. Mutat Res. 2010;705:83–95. doi: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2010.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Manikkam M, Tracey R, Guerrero-Bosagna C, Skinner MK. Dioxin (tcdd) induces epigenetic transgenerational inheritance of adult onset disease and sperm epimutations. PLoS One. 2012;7:e46249. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Singh S, Li SS. Epigenetic effects of environmental chemicals bisphenol a and phthalates. International journal of molecular sciences. 2012;13:10143–10153. doi: 10.3390/ijms130810143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Dorostghoal M, Erfani Majd N, Nooraei P. Maternal caffeine consumption has irreversible effects on reproductive parameters and fertility in male offspring rats. Clinical and experimental reproductive medicine. 2012;39:144–152. doi: 10.5653/cerm.2012.39.4.144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Espinoza-Lewis RA, Wang DZ. Micrornas in heart development. Current topics in developmental biology. 2012;100:279–317. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-387786-4.00009-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Christian MS, Brent RL. Teratogen update: Evaluation of the reproductive and developmental risks of caffeine. Teratology. 2001;64:51–78. doi: 10.1002/tera.1047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Ross CP, Persaud TV. Cardiovascular primordium of the rat embryo following in utero exposure to alcohol and caffeine. The Canadian journal of cardiology. 1986;2:160–163. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Ross CP, Persaud TV. Early embryonic development in the rat following in utero exposure to alcohol and caffeine. Histol Histopathol. 1986;1:13–17. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Momoi N, Tinney JP, Liu LJ, Elshershari H, Hoffmann PJ, Ralphe JC, Keller BB, Tobita K. Modest maternal caffeine exposure affects developing embryonic cardiovascular function and growth. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2008;294:H2248–2256. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.91469.2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Gersh BJ, Maron BJ, Bonow RO, Dearani JA, Fifer MA, Link MS, Naidu SS, Nishimura RA, Ommen SR, Rakowski H, Seidman CE, Towbin JA, Udelson JE, Yancy CW, American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice G, American Association for Thoracic S, American Society of E, American Society of Nuclear C, Heart Failure Society of A, Heart Rhythm S, Society for Cardiovascular A, Interventions, Society of Thoracic S 2011 accf/aha guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: Executive summary: A report of the american college of cardiology foundation/american heart association task force on practice guidelines. Circulation. 2011;124:2761–2796. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e318223e230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Parthiban A, Shirali G. Echocardiographic evaluation of the failing heart. Cardiology in the young. 2015;25(Suppl 2):87–93. doi: 10.1017/S1047951115000876. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Kim Y, Phan D, van Rooij E, Wang DZ, McAnally J, Qi X, Richardson JA, Hill JA, Bassel-Duby R, Olson EN. The mef2d transcription factor mediates stress-dependent cardiac remodeling in mice. J Clin Invest. 2008;118:124–132. doi: 10.1172/JCI33255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Frey N, Olson EN. Cardiac hypertrophy: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Annual review of physiology. 2003;65:45–79. doi: 10.1146/annurev.physiol.65.092101.142243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Kawaji T, Shiomi H, Morimoto T, Tazaki J, Imai M, Saito N, Makiyama T, Shizuta S, Ono K, Kimura T. Clinical impact of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction in takotsubo cardiomyopathy. Circ J. 2015;79:839–846. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-14-1148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES