ABSTRACT
Despite a great deal of prior research, the early pathogenic events in natural oral poliovirus infection remain poorly defined. To establish a model for study, we infected 39 macaques by feeding them single high doses of the virulent Mahoney strain of wild type 1 poliovirus. Doses ranging from 107 to 109 50% tissue culture infective doses (TCID50) consistently infected all the animals, and many monkeys receiving 108 or 109 TCID50 developed paralysis. There was no apparent difference in the susceptibilities of the three macaque species (rhesus, cynomolgus, and bonnet) used. Virus excretion in stool and nasopharynges was consistently observed, with occasional viremia, and virus was isolated from tonsils, gut mucosa, and draining lymph nodes. Viral replication proteins were detected in both epithelial and lymphoid cell populations expressing CD155 in the tonsil and intestine, as well as in spinal cord neurons. Necrosis was observed in these three cell types, and viral replication in the tonsil/gut was associated with histopathologic destruction and inflammation. The sustained response of neutralizing antibody correlated temporally with resolution of viremia and termination of virus shedding in oropharynges and feces. For the first time, this model demonstrates that early in the infectious process, poliovirus replication occurs in both epithelial cells (explaining virus shedding in the gastrointestinal tract) and lymphoid/monocytic cells in tonsils and Peyer's patches (explaining viremia), extending previous studies of poliovirus pathogenesis in humans. Because the model recapitulates human poliovirus infection and poliomyelitis, it can be used to study polio pathogenesis and to assess the efficacy of candidate antiviral drugs and new vaccines.
IMPORTANCE Early pathogenic events of poliovirus infection remain largely undefined, and there is a lack of animal models mimicking natural oral human infection leading to paralytic poliomyelitis. All 39 macaques fed with single high doses ranging from 107 to 109 TCID50 Mahoney type 1 virus were infected, and many of the monkeys developed paralysis. Virus excretion in stool and nasopharynges was consistently observed, with occasional viremia; tonsil, mesentery lymph nodes, and intestinal mucosa served as major target sites of viral replication. For the first time, this model demonstrates that early in the infectious process, poliovirus replication occurs in both epithelial cells (explaining virus shedding in the gastrointestinal tract) and lymphoid/monocytic cells in tonsils and Peyer's patches (explaining viremia), thereby supplementing historical reconstructions of poliovirus pathogenesis. Because the model recapitulates human poliovirus infection and poliomyelitis, it can be used to study polio pathogenesis, candidate antiviral drugs, and the efficacy of new vaccines.
KEYWORDS: oral poliovirus infection, poliomyelitis, animal model, macaques
INTRODUCTION
Although we are approaching the global eradication of circulating wild-type polioviruses, the endgame remains uncertain (1). Wild-type polio cases are still reported in the countries where the virus is endemic, including Nigeria, Afghanistan, and Pakistan (2). Moreover, oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV) immunization with some vaccinees could lead to emergence of circulating vaccine-derived poliovirus (cVDPV), vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis (VAPP), or outbreaks of poliomyelitis (1, 3). Complete cessation of all poliovirus infections requires stopping the use of OPV and developing an improved vaccine and effective drugs to treat chronically infected poliovirus excretors (http://www.polioeradication.org/Resourcelibrary/Strategyandwork.aspx). This would involve worldwide transition to inactivated poliovirus vaccines and development of additional prophylactic and therapeutic tools, including antipoliovirus drugs. These development programs are actively supported by the World Health Organization and call for a better understanding of poliovirus pathogenesis, which remains incompletely elucidated (4). Evaluation of these new products would benefit from an animal model that closely resembles human poliovirus infection, and such a model would be of substantial benefit to the global polio eradication endgame.
Mice genetically modified to express the human poliovirus receptor (CD155) are susceptible to parenteral infection with polioviruses. However, they do not adequately model human infection, because they cannot be infected by the natural (oral) route (5–7). Although nonhuman primates (NHP) were historically used for polio research, most studies employed needle injection approaches, rather than single oral exposures, to describe the pathogenesis of poliomyelitis and define vaccine efficacy (4, 8–11). In fact, there has been a lack of in-depth NHP studies using a single oral exposure with tissue-free virus inoculum. Thus, the initial pathogenic events in natural oral poliovirus infection remain poorly defined (4, 9, 12, 13).
Here, we report results aimed at closing this gap by documenting an NHP model that leads to consistent infection with a single dose given by the oral route, followed by a high frequency of paralytic poliomyelitis.
RESULTS
Oral exposure to type 1 poliovirus reproducibly induced productive poliovirus infection in rhesus, cynomolgus, and bonnet macaques.
Three species of macaques (rhesus, cynomolgus, and bonnet) were included in the study using the cloned type 1 poliovirus Mahoney. While the poliovirus reproducibly infected CD155+ cells and the virus titers in fecal samples could readily be measured by viral plaque assays (Fig. 1a and b), the three species of macaques did not appear to exhibit any significant differences in CD155 expression in peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL) and gut mucosa (Fig. 1c and d).
A total of 39 macaques were fed single doses (ranging from 109 to 107 50% tissue culture infective doses [TCID50]) of the highly virulent Mahoney strain of wild type 1 poliovirus contained in 60 ml of apple juice. All the animals were successfully infected, as evidenced by fecal excretion of virus (Fig. 2a and b). Furthermore, 12 of the animals developed overt paralytic disease, with somewhat greater frequency among those fed with the two larger inocula (paralysis rate, 11/29) than among those fed with the lowest inoculum (1/10) (Table 1). The three species of macaques appeared to be equally susceptible, although the small numbers preclude a definitive comparison (Fig. 2a).
TABLE 1.
Log10 inoculum | Rhesus | Cynomolgus | Bonnet | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|
9 | 2/5 | 1/5 | 1/3 | 4/13 |
8 | 5/11 | 2/5 | 7/16 | |
7 | 1/5 | 0/5 | 1/10 | |
Totals | 8/21 | 3/15 | 1/3 | 12/39 |
The titers of fecally excreted virus showed a two-phase pattern (Fig. 2b). At day 1 after infection, the inoculum appeared to “pass through” the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, leading to high PFU counts that declined sharply on day 2. Fecal virus increased again on day 3 or day 5 and remained detectable through day 16, while low levels of cytopathic viruses were detected in several animals through day 23. Fecal viruses detected at day 3 or later likely represented replicating poliovirus, based on experiments using neutral red poliovirus (data not shown). Consistent with virus isolation data, a quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) assay detected high levels of poliovirus RNA in feces from all the animals, confirming the 100% infection rate (Fig. 2b). This sensitive assay turned negative 3 weeks after infection, with no evidence of persistent excretion.
Tonsils, mesentery lymph nodes, and intestinal mucosa served as sites of viral replication after oral infection.
We then examined what tissues or sites in the gut contributed to viral replication and fecal shedding after oral feeding of the macaques. Most prior studies were based on virus recovery, and it has not been clear which cells within these tissues actually supported replication (4, 9, 12–14). We presumed that the tissues exhibiting high titers of poliovirus might represent sites of viral replication and shedding after oral poliovirus exposure. To test this, we examined tonsils, small and large intestines, and mesenteric lymph nodes from animals sacrificed at days 9 to 12 after oral poliovirus exposure. Polioviruses were measurable in the tonsils and mesenteric nodes, which exhibited higher titers than the small and large intestines (Fig. 3). The quantitative results at the tissue level provided an opportunity to determine what cells were supporting replication and whether the gut epithelium was infected.
Viral replication proteins were detected in both epithelial and lymphoid cell populations expressing CD155 in the tonsil and intestinal mucosa from paralytic monkeys with fecal viral shedding.
Next, we sought to determine whether epithelial cells or lymphoid cells harbored poliovirus replication. To date, whether epithelial or lymphoid cells are the primary sites of poliovirus replication in the gut has remained a matter of debate (4, 9). Previously, fluorescence-labeled immunoglobulin from a poliovirus-infected macaque was used to detect poliovirus in epithelia or speculative macrophages after viral feeding (15). Technical difficulties, including nonspecific staining by the monkey serum (15), indicated a need to conduct a further study. On the other hand, tissue expression patterns for the poliovirus receptor CD155 were compared in humans, macaques, and CD155-transgenic mice, and the presence of CD155 in follicle-associated epithelium and on cells of the Peyer's patches in the gut suggested that they were potentially susceptible to infection (16). However, there is a lack of direct evidence for detecting virus or viral protein in gut epithelia or lymphoid cells in the Peyer's patches after oral poliovirus infection (8, 10, 11, 16, 17).
We employed in situ multicolor immune staining of viral replication protein, CD155, and cell markers for epithelium/immune cells in infected tonsils and intestinal mucosa at days 8 to 12 after oral infection of the macaques. Surprisingly, poliovirus polymerase 3D, a surrogate marker for viral replication, was detected in CD155+ stratified squamous epithelial cells in the tonsil crypt (Fig. 4a) and CD155+ CD11+ macrophages/dendritic cells (DC) in the tonsil follicle (Fig. 4b). Similarly, polymerase 3D was also detected in intestinal CD155+ epithelial cells (Fig. 4c) and CD11C+ macrophages/DC in the intestinal mucosa containing lamina propria or a Peyer's patch-like area (Fig. 4d and e). These results suggest that both epithelial and lymphoid cell populations in oral-pharyngeal-intestinal mucosae support viral replication and infection after oral exposure in macaques.
Poliovirus infection/replication in the tonsil and gut coincided with histopathologic inflammation and destruction in the epithelia and mucosa-lymphoid interface.
Although invasion of intestinal mucosa by poliovirus infection was implicated (13), it has not been reported that poliovirus invasion and replication result in characteristic lesions or destruction of the tonsil and GI mucosa (11, 13, 14, 17). To address this, we conducted thorough histopathology studies of tonsil and gut mucosa harboring high titers of replicating poliovirus, as demonstrated in Fig. 2 to 4. In the Mahoney poliovirus-infected macaques with high virus titers in those tissues, the stratified squamous epithelia lining the tonsil crypts could be disrupted by infiltrating inflammatory cells, with apparent hemorrhage (Fig. 5a top left, arrows). Notably, the destruction and disappearance of the tonsil epithelia coverings were seen (indicated by red arrows in Fig. 5a, bottom left), whereas the crypt lumen was filled with apparent exudates comprised of numerous inflammatory and necrotic cells (red arrows). Similarly, disruptive or necrotic epithelial cells/tissue in the intestinal mucosa was seen, together with inflammatory exudates in the gut lumen and in the lamina propria (Fig. 5b, left). Numerous inflammatory cells were seen to infiltrate the interstitial compartment (lamina propria) or mucosa-lymphoid interface of the small intestine (Fig. 5b, bottom left). Of note, these histopathology changes were not seen in the tonsil and intestinal mucosa from control macaques not infected with Mahoney poliovirus (at Fig. 5a and b, right). Under healthy conditions, new and intact epithelia should be seen to outgrow or replace potentially aging or dying cells without mucosal inflammation or destruction, but this was lacking here. Thus, destruction and histopathologic inflammation in the tonsil and intestinal mucosa are found coincident with detectable viral replication in epithelial and lymphoid cells.
Oral infection with Mahoney poliovirus reproducibly induced acute flaccid paralysis with typical poliomyelitis pathology.
As shown in Table 1, 12 of 39 infected animals developed acute flaccid paralysis in the legs and/or arms. The onset of paralysis ranged from 8 to 22 days after oral poliovirus exposure. Eleven of 29 macaques fed with 108 or 109 TCID50 developed paralysis, whereas only one of 10 macaques fed with 107 TCID50 developed paralysis (Table 1).
Eight of 21 rhesus macaques developed paralytic poliomyelitis, and all 8 animals had extensive paralysis involving 3 or 4 limbs. Three of 15 cynomolgus macaques developed paralysis, but two of them had only one paralytic lower limb. The paralyzed macaques were euthanatized within 48 h after they developed clinical signs of paralytic poliomyelitis and were subjected to detailed necropsy. Although no gross pathology was found in the central nervous system (CNS), the paralyzed macaques exhibited the destruction of neurons with neuronophagia, the typical histopathology of poliomyelitis in spinal cord sections (Fig. 6).
Paralytic poliomyelitis after neuronal spread correlated with high titers of poliovirus in the spinal cord and replicating poliovirus in CD155+ neurons.
CNS tissues collected from monkeys necropsied 24 to 48 h after the onset of paralysis were homogenized and assessed. High titers of plaque-forming polioviruses were detected in the cervical and lumbosacral enlargements and thoracic segments of the spinal cord, while low or moderate titers of poliovirus were found in the brain or brainstem (Fig. 7a, top). High levels of poliovirus mRNA were consistently detected in the same spinal cord homogenates (Fig. 7a). Poliovirus polymerase 3D was detected by confocal microscopy in the cytoplasm of CD155+ neurons in the anterior horn sections prepared from the spinal cords of paralyzed macaques (Fig. 7b).
Detectable response of neutralizing Ab correlated temporally with resolution of viremia and virus shedding in oropharynges/stool.
The detailed interrelations of neutralizing antibody (Ab) response, viremia, and viral shedding in feces or throats after oral wild-type poliovirus infection leading to paralysis remain incompletely demonstrated in macaques (8, 10, 18). Here, almost all the macaques developed immune responses, as revealed by detection of poliovirus-specific neutralizing Ab starting around 2 weeks postinfection (Fig. 8a). Overall, the neutralizing Ab started to emerge at the late time of transient poliovirus replication in the blood and oropharynges (Fig. 8a and b). Such transient replication was interpreted here by poliovirus-specific qRT-PCR performed on throat washings and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC), although plaque assay failed to detect plaque-forming live viruses (Fig. 8b). Notably, the neutralizing Ab titers were sustained throughout the experiment, and such sustained responses of neutralizing Abs coincided temporally with resolution of viremia and virus shedding in oropharynges and stool (Fig. 2b and 8).
DISCUSSION
The current study establishes an NHP model for oral infection with human poliovirus that closely mimics natural infection in humans. This study extends previous studies in NHP (8, 10, 12, 13, 16) and helps to fill a longstanding gap in the development of experimental animal models of oral infection leading to development of poliomyelitis. To our knowledge, this work is one of very few studies demonstrating that a single oral exposure to tissue-free poliovirus inoculum is able to induce productive infection and paralytic poliomyelitis in NHP. Historically, in the 1940s, feeding with spinal cord-, feces-, or murine-adapted virus induced a low frequency of paralysis in cynomolgus and rhesus macaques (19–23). Subsequent studies in NHP mostly employed needle injection approaches to confirm human polio and to define vaccine efficacy and the pathogenesis of paralytic poliomyelitis (4, 9, 11). Some studies in the 1950s or later showed that repeated feeding of rhesus or cynomolgus macaques could lead to paralytic consequences (8), but a single oral exposure was unable to induce paralysis (10, 22). Our use of large doses of the Mahoney strain, which is known to be highly paralytogenic and pantropic, may explain the 100% infection rate and the surprisingly high frequency of paralysis upon single oral exposure.
Prior studies have claimed that rhesus macaques are resistant to oral poliovirus infection (13, 16) or that repeated oral feeding was needed to induce productive poliovirus infection in rhesus and cynomolgus macaques (8, 21). Our study demonstrated that rhesus macaques were indeed susceptible to productive infection and subsequent paralytic poliomyelitis upon a single oral exposure.
One of our major goals was to establish an oral infection model for studies of polio pathogenesis. We therefore tested 3 high doses to maximize rates of productive infection and paralysis. Using a relatively modest number of macaques, we have achieved our goal of developing a practical oral infection model leading to paralytic poliomyelitis. This success does not support the further use of larger numbers of macaques for a median infectious dose (ID50) or median paralytic dose (PD50) determination.
It is noteworthy that this highly paralytic model is different from the low paralysis rate in humans. Nevertheless, our model provides an opportunity to dissect polio pathogenesis in the setting of 100% productive infection and high-frequency paralysis after single-dose oral feeding. On the other hand, our data support the presumption that NHP are less sensitive to oral poliovirus infection but more susceptible to paralytic poliomyelitis than humans (13, 24).
In addition to providing a model of “natural” poliovirus infection leading to paralysis, the present study takes the localization of infection from the tissue level to the cellular level, an important advance in understanding the pathogenesis of this infection. We have shown that the virus appears to replicate in stratified squamous epithelial cells in the tonsil crypt and CD11C+ macrophages/DC in the tonsil follicle, as well as gut epithelia and macrophages/DC in the small intestine. The results suggest that both epithelial and lymphoid cell populations support viral replication after oral infection, a major extension of the longstanding syntheses proposed by Bodian and Sabin in the 1950s (12, 13). Furthermore, this model also identifies infection-associated histopathologic lesions in the epithelia and mucosa-lymphoid interface of the tonsil and intestine harboring high titers of replicating poliovirus after oral exposure.
In conclusion, the model will be useful for testing candidate antiviral drugs and newly engineered vaccine candidates, which may be required in order to eradicate all poliovirus infections. The model will also enable in-depth mechanistic studies of polio pathogenesis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Animals.
Thirty-nine macaques, including 21 rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta), 15 cynomolgus macaques (Macaca fascicularis), and 3 bonnet macaques (Macaca radiate), were used in this study. They ranged from 3 to 12 years of age and included both females and males, with body weights of 3 to 10 kg. Animal studies were conducted in biosafety level 3 facilities and were approved by the institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) (ACC15-243).
Oral poliovirus infection.
Prior to oral infection, the macaques were trained to voluntarily take apple juice fed via 60-ml catheter-tipped syringes. At the time of single oral feeding, a defined single dose of poliovirus was added to the apple juice for oral administration.
Extraction and concentration of fecal samples from macaques.
Feces were collected daily (total excreta, not just a sample) from individual macaques for plaque assays and qRT-PCR. This method was adopted from the protocol provided by Andrew J. Macadam, National Institute for Biological Standards and Control, United Kingdom. Approximately 100 ml of feces from each macaque was divided into five 50-ml high-speed-resistant centrifuge tubes (20 ml each) and mixed with 12 5-mm3 micro-glass beads (Swarovski), 20 ml phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and 2 ml chloroform. The mixture was shaken on an ice bath by a ProBlot 25× LD Economy Rocker at 120 rpm for 30 min and then was centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 40 min at 4°C (Avanti J-26XP centrifuge with a JA-12 rotor; Beckman-Coulter). The supernatant was collected and filtered with a Millipore vacuum filtration system. The filtered fecal extracts were transferred into Millipore Amicon 30K centrifugal filter units and contracted by centrifugation at 3,600 rpm for 40 min. This step was repeated to concentrate the extraction into a volume of ∼2 ml.
Throat swab eluate preparation.
For each animal, a total of 3 sterile polyester-tipped swabs (Puritan) were used to brush against the mucosal surface at the back of the throat, including tonsils and adenoids, and then the swabs were dipped into 1 ml of sterile PBS and vortexed vigorously for 30 s; the swabs were discarded, and the eluate was collected for assays.
Isolation of lymphocytes from blood by Ficoll-Paque.
The standard Ficoll-Paque method was described in detail in previous publications (4, 14).
Tissue homogenization.
Brain, brain stem, spinal cord (cervical enlargement, thoracic segment, and lumbosacral enlargement), tonsil, small and large intestine mucosa, and mesenteric lymph nodes were collected from the euthanized polio-paralytic macaques. Homogenates were made of 1-cm3 tissue sections, and 5-fold serial dilutions of the homogenate in sterile PBS plus 0.05% Tween were tested by plaque assays and qRT-PCR.
Poliovirus plaque assay.
HeLa cells were grown in 12-well culture plates in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) at 37°C with 5% CO2 until 90% confluent monolayers (∼2 × 106 cells/well) were formed in 24 to 36 h; 100-μl samples were added to each well and incubated at 37°C with 5% CO2 for 15 min. The cells were overlaid with approximately 2 ml 2% FBS-DMEM agarose gel in each well and incubated at 37°C with 5% CO2 for 48 h. The gel overlay was gently decanted from each well, and the cell layers were rinsed with PBS, fixed with 1 ml of 2% formalin for 10 min, stained with crystal violet for 10 min, rinsed under water, and air dried. Plaques were counted under a microscope, and titers were expressed as PFU per 100 ml of feces.
Viral RNA isolation and qRT-PCR.
Poliovirus RNA was isolated with an RNeasy minikit (Qiagen) and reverse transcribed with a SuperScript III first-strand synthesis system (Life Technologies) following standard protocols from the manufacturer. Sequences of primers were as follows: forward primer, 5′-AGGTCAGATGCTTGAAAGC; reverse primer 5′-TCCACTGGCTTCAGTGTT; probe, 5′-CACAGTCCGTGAAACGGTGG, with 6-carboxyfluorescein (FAM) as the 5′ dye and 6-carboxytetramethylrhodamine (TAMRA) as the 3′ quencher. The qRT-PCR experiments were performed in an Applied Biosystems 7300 real-time PCR system (Life Technologies), and the PCR products were quantified fluorometrically using TaqMan master mix (Life Technologies), as previously described (25). The qRT-PCR was validated by intra-assays/interassays, with detection limits of RNA copies from ∼5 to 10 PFU/100 ml.
In situ confocal microscopic analysis of poliovirus polymerase 3D, CD155, and other markers in tissue sections from poliovirus-infected macaques.
The OCT tissue blocks were cut into 6-μm sections using a cryostat, as previously described (26). The frozen tissue sections were fixed with cold acetone for 10 min, rinsed with PBS, and then blocked with protein-blocking serum-free buffer (Dako, X0909) for 30 min. The sections were incubated for 1 h in the dark with diluted primary antibodies (mouse anti-human epithelium monoclonal antibody [MAb], Life Span Bioscience, LS-c65481, or biotin-conjugated mouse anti-CD155 [D171] MAb, GR 224625) in antibody diluent with background-reducing components. The sections were washed twice with PBS and then incubated for 30 min with diluted secondary antibodies (Qdot525 donkey anti-mouse IgG conjugate [H+L], lot 1356566; phycoerythrin [PE]-streptavidin; or fluorescein isothiocyanate [FITC]-streptavidin). Tissue sections were incubated for 30 min with normal mouse serum, washed twice, and then incubated for 30 min with protein-blocking serum-free medium. The sections were then incubated for 1 h with diluted fluorescence-labeled antibodies (allophycocyanin [APC]-conjugated mouse anti-3D MAb, produced/characterized by GenScript and the Chen laboratory; phycoerythrin [PE]-conjugated mouse anti-human CD14, BD, catalog no. 555398, or FITC-conjugated anti-human CD11C [Biolegend; catalog no. 301603]). Sections were scanned with a Zeiss LSM 710 confocal microscope using a 40× water objective lens, and images were acquired with the Zen software. Control staining using IgG isotypes or anti-3D staining of normal uninfected tissues did not give rise to fluorescent images on the sections under the confocal microscope (Fig. 4f and 7b).
Gross pathological analysis and histopathologic evaluation of lesions in tonsil and gut as poliomyelitis in the spinal cord.
Paralytic animals were euthanized within 24 to 48 h after development of paralysis using intravenous barbiturate overdose and immediately necropsied in a biological safety cabinet. Standard gross pathological evaluation procedures were used. The central nervous system, including brain, brain stem, and spinal cord, and the gastrointestinal tract, including tonsil, small and large intestines, mesenteric lymph nodes, and other major organs, were collected, examined, and processed for histology analysis. Histopathologic lesions were determined using digital scans to record total pixel counts on hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained sections, and the specimen area was measured in square centimeters using Image-Pro Plus software (Media Cybernetics, Silver Spring, MD), as we previously described (26, 27). Histopathologic lesions in the spinal cord and other CNS tissues were measured in the reference poliomyelitis scores described in the WHO protocol (28).
Microneutralization test.
Poliovirus-neutralizing antibody titers were determined in a standard WHO microneutralization test (29).
Statistical analysis.
The multivariate analysis of variance (ANOVA) and nonparametric t test were used, as previously described (27).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Eun-Chung Park (NIAID) for providing scientific advice, Craig Cameron (Penn State University) for providing 3D antibody, the UIC BRL staff for animal care, Eugenia Dragunsky at the FDA for useful discussion of the histopathology of poliomyelitis, and other staff members in the Chen laboratory for technical support.
This project has been wholly funded with federal funds from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, under contract number HHSN266200500016-I (Task Order D23/C28).
We do not have any competing interests.
REFERENCES
- 1.Nathanson N, Kew OM. 2010. From emergence to eradication: the epidemiology of poliomyelitis deconstructed. Am J Epidemiol 172:1213–1229. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwq320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Roberts L. 2016. Infectious disease. New polio cases in Nigeria spur massive response. Science 353:738. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hagan JE, Wassilak SG, Craig AS, Tangermann RH, Diop OM, Burns CC, Quddus A, Centers for Disease and Prevention. 2015. Progress toward polio eradication—worldwide, 2014-2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 64:527–531. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Nathanson N. 2008. The pathogenesis of poliomyelitis: what we don't know. Adv Virus Res 71:1–50. doi: 10.1016/S0065-3527(08)00001-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Koike S, Horie H, Sato Y, Ise I, Taya C, Nomura T, Yoshioka I, Yonekawa H, Nomoto A. 1993. Poliovirus-sensitive transgenic mice as a new animal model. Dev Biol Stand 78:101–107. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Mendelsohn CL, Wimmer E, Racaniello VR. 1989. Cellular receptor for poliovirus: molecular cloning, nucleotide sequence, and expression of a new member of the immunoglobulin superfamily. Cell 56:855–865. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90690-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ren RB, Costantini F, Gorgacz EJ, Lee JJ, Racaniello VR. 1990. Transgenic mice expressing a human poliovirus receptor: a new model for poliomyelitis. Cell 63:353–362. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90168-E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Craig DE, Brown GC. 1959. The relationship between poliomyelitis antibody and virus excretion from the pharynx and anus or orally infected monkeys. Am J Hyg 69:1–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Racaniello VR. 2006. One hundred years of poliovirus pathogenesis. Virology 344:9–16. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2005.09.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Selvakumar R, John TJ. 1987. Intestinal immunity induced by inactivated poliovirus vaccine. Vaccine 5:141–144. doi: 10.1016/0264-410X(87)90062-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Takahashi Y, Misumi S, Muneoka A, Masuyama M, Tokado H, Fukuzaki K, Takamune N, Shoji S. 2008. Nonhuman primate intestinal villous M-like cells: an effective poliovirus entry site. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 368:501–507. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.01.120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bodian D. 1955. Emerging concept of poliomyelitis infection. Science 122:105–108. doi: 10.1126/science.122.3159.105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Sabin AB. 1956. Pathogenesis of poliomyelitis; reappraisal in the light of new data. Science 123:1151–1157. doi: 10.1126/science.123.3209.1151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Minor PD. 1997. Poliovirus in viral pathogenesis, p 555–574. Lippincott-Raven Publishers, Philadelphia, PA. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kanamitsu M, Kasamaki A, Ogawa M, Kasahara S, Imamura M. 1967. Immunofluorescent study on the pathogenesis of oral infection of poliovirus in monkeys. Jpn Med Sci Biol 20:175–194. doi: 10.7883/yoken1952.20.175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Iwasaki A, Welker R, Mueller S, Linehan M, Nomoto A, Wimmer E. 2002. Immunofluorescence analysis of poliovirus receptor expression in Peyer's patches of humans, primates, and CD155 transgenic mice: implications for poliovirus infection. J Infect Dis 186:585–592. doi: 10.1086/342682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Khan S, Toyoda H, Linehan M, Iwasaki A, Nomoto A, Bernhardt G, Cello J, Wimmer E. 2014. Poliomyelitis in transgenic mice expressing CD155 under the control of the Tage4 promoter after oral and parenteral poliovirus inoculation. J Gen Virol 95:1668–1676. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.064535-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Selvakumar R, John TJ. 1989. Intestinal immunity to poliovirus develops only after repeated infections in monkeys. J Med Virol 27:112–116. doi: 10.1002/jmv.1890270208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Bodian D, Howe HA. 1945. Non-paralytic poliomyelitis in the chimpanzee. J Exp Med 81:255–274. doi: 10.1084/jem.81.3.255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Horstmann DM. 1952. Poliomyelitis virus in blood of orally infected monkeys and chimpanzees. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 79:417–419. doi: 10.3181/00379727-79-19398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Horstmann DM, Melnick JL, Ward R, Sa Fleitas MJ. 1947. The Susceptibility of infant rhesus monkeys to poliomyelitis virus administered by mouth: a study of the distribution of virus in the tissues of orally infected animals. J Exp Med 86:309–323. doi: 10.1084/jem.86.4.309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Howe HA, Bodian D, Morgan IM. 1950. Subclinical poliomyelitis in the chimpanzee and its relation to alimentary reinfection. Am J Hyg 51:85–108, tab. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Melnick JL, Von Magnus H. 1948. Comparative susceptibility of cynomolgus and other monkey species to poliomyelitis virus by the intracerebral and oral routes. Am J Hyg 48:107–112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Knowlson S, Burlison J, Giles E, Fox H, Macadam AJ, Minor PD. 2015. New strains intended for the production of inactivated polio vaccine at low-containment after eradication. PLoS Pathog 11:e1005316. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Huang D, Qiu L, Wang R, Lai X, Du G, Seghal P, Shen Y, Shao L, Halliday L, Fortman J, Shen L, Letvin NL, Chen ZW. 2007. Immune gene networks of mycobacterial vaccine-elicited cellular responses and immunity. J Infect Dis 195:55–69. doi: 10.1086/509895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Huang D, Chen CY, Ali Z, Shao L, Shen L, Lockman HA, Barnewall RE, Sabourin C, Eestep J, Reichenberg A, Hintz M, Jomaa H, Wang R, Chen ZW. 2009. Antigen-specific Vgamma2Vdelta2 T effector cells confer homeostatic protection against pneumonic plaque lesions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:7553–7558. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0811250106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Chen CY, Yao S, Huang D, Wei H, Sicard H, Zeng G, Jomaa H, Larsen MH, Jacobs WR Jr, Wang R, Letvin N, Shen Y, Qiu L, Shen L, Chen ZW. 2013. Phosphoantigen/IL2 expansion and differentiation of Vgamma2Vdelta2 T cells increase resistance to tuberculosis in nonhuman primates. PLoS Pathog 9:e1003501. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.World Health Organization. 25 October 2011. WHO protocol: neurovirulence test of types 1, 2 or 3 live poliomyelitis vaccines (oral) in monkeys. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland: http://www.who.int/biologicals/vaccines/MNVT_protocol_v2510_311011_For_inviting_comments.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- 29.World Health Organization. 2004. Polio laboratory manual. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/68762/1/WHO_IVB_04.10.pdf. [Google Scholar]