Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2017 Jun 24;2017(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s13660-017-1424-x

Hardy type inequalities on the sphere

Xiaomei Sun 1,, Fan Pan 1
PMCID: PMC5487932  PMID: 28680251

Abstract

In this paper, we consider the Lp-Hardy inequalities on the sphere. By the divergence theorem, we establish the Lp-Hardy inequalities on the sphere. Furthermore, we also obtain their best constants. Our results can be regarded as the extension of Xiao’s (J. Math. Inequal. 10:793-805, 2016).

Keywords: Hardy type inequality, sphere, best constant

Introduction

The classical Hardy inequality states that for N3 and p>1

RN|u|pdx|Npp|pRN|u|p|x|pdx, 1

with uC0(RN){0} and |Npp|p the best constant. In recent years, many papers have been dedicated to improved versions of the above inequality because of its application to singular problems. We see [26] and the references therein. Hardy inequalities are a subfamily of the Caffarelli-Kohn-Nirenberg inequalities. In a Riemannian manifold, the knowledge of the validity of these inequalities and their best constants allows us to obtain qualitative properties on the manifold [710].

Recently, Carron [11] studied the weighted L2-Hardy inequalities on a Riemannian manifold under some geometric assumptions on the weighted function ρ and obtained the following inequality:

Mρα|u|2dx|C+α12|2Mρα|u|2ρ2dx,

where the weighted function ρ satisfies |ρ|=1 and ΔρCρ. In [12], Grillo obtained Hardy, Rellich and Sobolev inequalities in homogeneous spaces. Recently, Kombe and Özaydin [13] extended Carron’s results to the general case p2. Moreover, they obtained the sharp versions of improved Hardy inequalities and an improved Rellich inequality in hyperbolic spaces. By the divergence theorem and careful choices of a vector field, D’Ambrosio and Dipierro [14] proved a sufficient criterion to obtain Lp-Hardy inequalities on Riemannian manifolds. That is, if ρ satisfies Δpρ0, then the following Hardy inequality was obtained:

CM|ρ|p|u|pρpdVgM|u|pdVg,uC0(M).

Very recently, by a similar approach that appeared in [13], Xiao [1] studied the L2-Hardy inequality and the Rellich inequality on the sphere, and obtained their best constants. Yang, Su and Kong [15] considered the Lp-Hardy inequalities on a complete, simply connected Riemannian manifold with negative curvature. They obtained the sharp constants of Hardy and Rellich inequalities related to the geodesic distance. In this paper, we aim to extend Xiao’s results [1] to a general case.

Our main results

Our main result is the following Lp-Hardy inequality on the sphere.

Theorem 1

Let N3, 1<p<N, qSN, then there exists a positive constant C>0 such that for all fC(SN), we have for 2p<N,

CSN|f|psinp2d(x,q)dV+SN|Sf|pdV(Npp)pSN(|f|pdp(x,q)+|f|p(πd(x,q))p)dV 2

for 1<p<2,

CSN|f|pdV+SN|Sf|pdV(Npp)pSN(|f|pdp(x,q)+|f|p(πd(x,q))p)dV, 3

where d(x,q) is the geodesic distance of x and q. Moreover, (Npp)p is the best constant.

Remark 2

When p=2, inequality (3) was obtained by Xiao [1]. When 1<p<2, SN|f|psinp2d(x,q)dV cannot control the right-hand side of (3) since sinp2d(x,q) is large enough when x is close to q. Therefore, we use SN|f|pdV as the left-hand side of the inequality instead of SN|f|psinp2d(x,q)dV.

Although our approach is similar to Xiao’s [1], the appearance of general p makes the calculation more complicated, especially for the existence of the constant C in Theorem 1.

Preliminaries and notations

Let SN={x=(x1,x2,,xn+1)RN+1;|x|=1} be the unit sphere of dimension N. Let (θ1,θ2,,θN) be the angular variables on SN. For simplicity, we define θN=θ, where xN+1=|x|cosθN. By polar coordinates associated with θ, we get

SNfdV=SN10πfsinN1θdσdθ,

where is the canonical measure of the unit sphere SN1. We say that a function f on SN is an angular function if f depends only on θ. In this case,

ΔSf=sin1Nθddθ(sinN1θdfdθ)

and

|Sf(θ)|=|f(θ)|.

See [1]. For more basic properties on the sphere, we refer to [16].

The proof of Theorem 1

Now we give the proof of Theorem 1.

Let f=ργφ, ρ=sinθ, γ=Npp, by the calculation that appeared in [13], one has

|Sf|p=|S(ργ)φ+ργSφ|p|S(ργ)φ|p+p|S(ργ)φ|p2|S(ργ)φργSφ,

then integration by parts gives

SN|Sf|pdV|γ|pSNργpp|Sρ|p|φ|pdV|γ|p2γγpp+2SNΔS(ργpp+2)|φ|pdV.

Since

|Sρ|=|Ssinθ|=|cosθ|

and

ΔS(ργpp+2)=ΔS(sin2Nθ)=(N2)sin2Nθ,

one has

SN|Sf|pdV(Npp)pSN|cosθ|p|φ|psinNθdV(Npp)p1SN|φ|psinN2θdV.

While

|cosθ|p=|cos2θ|p2=(1sin2θ)p21p2sin2θfor p2

and

|cosθ|pcos2θfor 1<p2.

The previous inequality can be written as follows:

SN|Sf|pdV(Npp)pSN|φ|psinNθdV((Npp)p1+min{p2,1}(Npp)p)SN|φ|psinN2θdV.

Define C(N,p)=(Npp)p1+min{p2,1}(Npp)p, then

C(N,p)SN|f|psinp2θdV+SN|Sf|pdV(Npp)pSN|f|psinpθdV. 4

In order to get our result, we rewrite the above inequality as

C(N,p)SN|f|psinp2θdV+SN|Sf|pdV(Npp)pSN(|f|pθp+|f|p(πθ)p)dV+(Npp)pSN|f|psinp2θ(1sin2θsinp2θθpsinp2θ(πθ)p)dV. 5

As we know, for p>2,

limθ0+(1sin2θsinp2θθpsinp2θ(πθ)p)=limθ0+θpsinpθθp+2=limθ0+1(sinθθ)pθ2limθ0+1(sinθθ)2θ2=13>0,

and for p=2,

limθ0+(1sin2θsinp2θθpsinp2θ(πθ)p)=131π>0.

Also, by a similar calculation, one has for p>2

limθπ(1sin2θsinp2θθpsinp2θ(πθ)p)13>0,

and for p=2

limθπ(1sin2θsinp2θθpsinp2θ(πθ)p)131π>0.

Therefore, there exist a constant θ1>0 small enough and θ2<π close to π such that for any θ(0,θ1][θ2,π), one has that

1sin2θsinp2θθpsinp2θ(πθ)p>0for p2.

Thus from inequality (5), one has

C(N,p)SN|f|psinp2θdV+SN|Sf|pdV(Npp)pSN(|f|pθp+|f|p(πθ)p)dV+(Npp)pSN([0,θ1][θ2,π])|f|psinp2θ(1sin2θsinp2θθpsinp2θ(πθ)p)dV+(Npp)pSN[θ1,θ2]|f|psinp2θ(1sin2θsinp2θθpsinp2θ(πθ)p)dV(Npp)pSN(|f|pθp+|f|p(πθ)p)dVC1SN|f|psinp2θdV,

where C1=supθ[θ1,θ2](1sin2θsinp2θθpsinp2θ(πθ)p).

Let C=C(N,p)+C1, one has that for p2

CSN|f|psinp2θdV+SN|Sf|pdV(Npp)pSN(|f|pθp+|f|p(πθ)p)dV,

which is exactly inequality (2).

While for 1<p<2, we get from inequality (4) that

C(N,p)SN|f|psinp2θdV+SN|Sf|pdV(Npp)pSN(|f|pθp+|f|p(πθ)p)dV+(Npp)pSN|f|p(1sinpθ1θp1(πθ)p)dV. 6

By a similar calculation, we get that for 1<p<2

1(πθ)p(1sinpθ1θp1(πθ)p)=1(sinθθ)psinpθ1(πθ)p1(sinθθ)2sin2θ1(πθ)p.

Since

limθ0+1(πθ)p=1πp,limθ0+1(sinθθ)2sin2θ1(πθ)p=131πp,

we get that there exists a constant θ1>0 small enough such that

supθ[0,θ1]|(1sinpθ1θp1(πθ)p)|<+.

Furthermore, by a similar calculation, we get that there exists a constant θ2 close to π such that

supθ[θ2,π]|(1sinpθ1θp1(πθ)p)|<+.

Therefore, we get that

C2:=supθ[0,π]|(1sinpθ1θp1(πθ)p)|<+.

Then, by inequality (6), one has

C(N,p)SN|f|psinp2θdV+SN|Sf|pdV(Npp)pSN(|f|pθp+|f|p(πθ)p)dVC2(Npp)pSN|f|pdV.

Let C=C(N,p)+C2(Npp)p, we get for 1<p<2

CSN|f|pdV+SN|Sf|pdV(Npp)pSN(|f|pθp+|f|p(πθ)p)dV,

which is exactly inequality (3).

Now we prove that (Npp)p is the best constant of inequalities (2) and (3).

Let φ(t)[0,1] be a cut-off function such that φ(t)1 for |t|1; φ(t)0 for |t|>2. Define H(t)=1φ(t) and

fϵ(θ)=H(θϵ)θpNpfor 0<θπ;fϵ(θ)=0for θ=0.

Then we have

SN|fϵ|psinp2θdV=|SN1|ϵπHp(θϵ)θpNsinNp+1θdθ|SN1|π2ϵ22, 7
SN|fϵ|pdV=|SN1|ϵπHp(θϵ)θpNsinN1θdθ|SN1|πpϵpp, 8
SN|fϵ|pθpdV=|SN1|ϵπHp(θϵ)θNsinN1θdθ|SN1|2ϵπθNsinN1θdθ, 9
SN|Sfϵ|pdV=|SN1|ϵπ|1ϵH(θϵ)θpNp+pNqH(θϵ)θNp|psinN1θdθ=|SN1|ϵ2ϵ|1ϵH(θϵ)θpNp+pNpH(θϵ)θNp|psinN1θdθ+|SN1|(Npp)p2ϵπ|H(θϵ)θNp|psinN1θdθC1maxt[0,2]|H(t)|+C2ϵ2ϵθ1dθ+|SN1|(Npp)p2ϵπθNsinN1θdθC4+|SN1|(Npp)p2ϵπθNsinN1θdθ. 10

Therefore, for p2, from inequalities (7), (9) and (10), one has

inffC(SN)CSN|f|psinp2θdV+SN|Sf|pdVSN|f|pθpdVCSN|fϵ|psinp2θdV+SN|Sϵf|pdVSN|fϵ|pθpdV|SN1|π2ϵ22+C4+|SN1|(Npp)p2ϵπθNsinN1θdθ|SN1|2ϵπθNsinN1θdθ,

then passing to the limit as ϵ0+, we have

inffC(SN)CSN|f|psinp2θdV+SN|Sf|pdVSN|f|pθpdV(Npp)p. 11

Since limϵ0+2ϵπθNsinN1θdθ+.

While for 1<p<2, from (8), (9) and (10), one has

inffC(SN)CSN|f|pdV+SN|Sf|pdVSN|f|pθpdVCSN|fϵ|pdV+SN|Sϵf|pdVSN|fϵ|pθpdV|SN1|πpϵpp+C4+|SN1|(Npp)p2ϵπθNsinN1θdθ|SN1|2ϵπθNsinN1θdθ,

then passing to the limit as ϵ0+, we have

inffC(SN)CSN|f|pdV+SN|Sf|pdVSN|f|pθpdV(Npp)p. 12

Therefore, from (2), (3), (11) and (12), we get that (Npp)p is the best constant of inequalities (2) and (3). Proof of Theorem 1 is finished.

Conclusion

In this paper, we consider the Hardy type inequalities on the sphere. By the divergence theorem [14], we extend the results of Xiao [1] to a general case. We establish the Lp-Hardy inequalities on the sphere and obtain their best constants.

Acknowledgements

The first author is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 11601173).

Footnotes

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

The main idea of this paper was proposed by XS. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Xiaomei Sun, Email: xmsunn@mail.hzau.edu.cn.

Fan Pan, Email: 631172907@qq.com.

References

  • 1.Xiao Y. Some Hardy inequalities on the sphere. J. Math. Inequal. 2016;10:793–805. doi: 10.7153/jmi-10-64. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Baras P, Goldstein JA. The heat equation with a singular potential. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 1984;284:121–139. doi: 10.1090/S0002-9947-1984-0742415-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Brezis H, Vázquez JL. Blow-up solutions of some nonlinear elliptic problems. Rev. Mat. Univ. Complut. Madr. 1997;10:443–469. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Garcia Azorero J, Peral I. Hardy inequalities and some critical elliptic and parabolic problems. J. Differ. Equ. 1998;144:441–476. doi: 10.1006/jdeq.1997.3375. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kombe I. The linear heat equation with a highly singular, oscillating potential. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 2004;132:2683–2691. doi: 10.1090/S0002-9939-04-07392-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Vázquez JL, Zuazua E. The Hardy constant and the asymptotic behaviour of the heat equation with an inverse-square potential. J. Funct. Anal. 2000;173:103–153. doi: 10.1006/jfan.1999.3556. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Adriano L, Xia C. Hardy type inequalities on complete Riemannian manifolds. Monatshefte Math. 2011;163:115–129. doi: 10.1007/s00605-010-0220-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.do Carmo MP, Xia C. Complete manifolds with non-negative Ricci curvature and the Caffarelli-Kohn-Nirenberg inequalities. Compos. Math. 2004;140:818–826. doi: 10.1112/S0010437X03000745. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Xia C. The Gagliardo-Nirenberg inequalities and manifolds of non-negative Ricci curvature. J. Funct. Anal. 2005;224:230–241. doi: 10.1016/j.jfa.2004.11.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Du F, Mao J. Hardy and Rellich type inequalities on metric measure spaces. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2015;429:354–365. doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2015.04.021. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Carron G. Inégalités de Hardy sur les variétés Riemanniennes non-compactes. J. Math. Pures Appl. 1997;76:883–891. doi: 10.1016/S0021-7824(97)89976-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Grillo G. Hardy and Rellich-type inequalities for metrics defined by vector fields. Potential Anal. 2003;18:187–217. doi: 10.1023/A:1020963702912. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kombe I, Özaydin M. Improved Hardy and Rellich inequalities on Riemannian manifolds. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 2009;361:6191–6203. doi: 10.1090/S0002-9947-09-04642-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.D’Ambrosio L, Dipierro S. Hardy inequalities on Riemannian manifolds and applications. Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré, Anal. Non Linéaire. 2014;31:449–475. doi: 10.1016/j.anihpc.2013.04.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Yang Q, Su D, Kong Y. Hardy inequalities on Riemannian manifolds with negative curvature. Commun. Contemp. Math. 2014;16 doi: 10.1142/S0219199713500430. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Gallot S, Hulin D, Lafontaine J. Riemannian Geometry. Berlin: Springer; 2004. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Inequalities and Applications are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES