Abstract
In this paper, we consider the -Hardy inequalities on the sphere. By the divergence theorem, we establish the -Hardy inequalities on the sphere. Furthermore, we also obtain their best constants. Our results can be regarded as the extension of Xiao’s (J. Math. Inequal. 10:793-805, 2016).
Keywords: Hardy type inequality, sphere, best constant
Introduction
The classical Hardy inequality states that for and
| 1 |
with and the best constant. In recent years, many papers have been dedicated to improved versions of the above inequality because of its application to singular problems. We see [2–6] and the references therein. Hardy inequalities are a subfamily of the Caffarelli-Kohn-Nirenberg inequalities. In a Riemannian manifold, the knowledge of the validity of these inequalities and their best constants allows us to obtain qualitative properties on the manifold [7–10].
Recently, Carron [11] studied the weighted -Hardy inequalities on a Riemannian manifold under some geometric assumptions on the weighted function ρ and obtained the following inequality:
where the weighted function ρ satisfies and . In [12], Grillo obtained Hardy, Rellich and Sobolev inequalities in homogeneous spaces. Recently, Kombe and Özaydin [13] extended Carron’s results to the general case . Moreover, they obtained the sharp versions of improved Hardy inequalities and an improved Rellich inequality in hyperbolic spaces. By the divergence theorem and careful choices of a vector field, D’Ambrosio and Dipierro [14] proved a sufficient criterion to obtain -Hardy inequalities on Riemannian manifolds. That is, if ρ satisfies , then the following Hardy inequality was obtained:
Very recently, by a similar approach that appeared in [13], Xiao [1] studied the -Hardy inequality and the Rellich inequality on the sphere, and obtained their best constants. Yang, Su and Kong [15] considered the -Hardy inequalities on a complete, simply connected Riemannian manifold with negative curvature. They obtained the sharp constants of Hardy and Rellich inequalities related to the geodesic distance. In this paper, we aim to extend Xiao’s results [1] to a general case.
Our main results
Our main result is the following -Hardy inequality on the sphere.
Theorem 1
Let , , , then there exists a positive constant such that for all , we have for ,
| 2 |
for ,
| 3 |
where is the geodesic distance of x and q. Moreover, is the best constant.
Remark 2
When , inequality (3) was obtained by Xiao [1]. When , cannot control the right-hand side of (3) since is large enough when x is close to q. Therefore, we use as the left-hand side of the inequality instead of .
Although our approach is similar to Xiao’s [1], the appearance of general p makes the calculation more complicated, especially for the existence of the constant C in Theorem 1.
Preliminaries and notations
Let be the unit sphere of dimension N. Let be the angular variables on . For simplicity, we define , where . By polar coordinates associated with θ, we get
where dσ is the canonical measure of the unit sphere . We say that a function f on is an angular function if f depends only on θ. In this case,
and
See [1]. For more basic properties on the sphere, we refer to [16].
The proof of Theorem 1
Now we give the proof of Theorem 1.
Let , , , by the calculation that appeared in [13], one has
then integration by parts gives
Since
and
one has
While
and
The previous inequality can be written as follows:
Define , then
| 4 |
In order to get our result, we rewrite the above inequality as
| 5 |
As we know, for ,
and for ,
Also, by a similar calculation, one has for
and for
Therefore, there exist a constant small enough and close to π such that for any , one has that
Thus from inequality (5), one has
where .
Let , one has that for
which is exactly inequality (2).
While for , we get from inequality (4) that
| 6 |
By a similar calculation, we get that for
Since
we get that there exists a constant small enough such that
Furthermore, by a similar calculation, we get that there exists a constant close to π such that
Therefore, we get that
Then, by inequality (6), one has
Let , we get for
which is exactly inequality (3).
Now we prove that is the best constant of inequalities (2) and (3).
Let be a cut-off function such that for ; for . Define and
Then we have
| 7 |
| 8 |
| 9 |
| 10 |
Therefore, for , from inequalities (7), (9) and (10), one has
then passing to the limit as , we have
| 11 |
Since .
While for , from (8), (9) and (10), one has
then passing to the limit as , we have
| 12 |
Therefore, from (2), (3), (11) and (12), we get that is the best constant of inequalities (2) and (3). Proof of Theorem 1 is finished.
Conclusion
In this paper, we consider the Hardy type inequalities on the sphere. By the divergence theorem [14], we extend the results of Xiao [1] to a general case. We establish the -Hardy inequalities on the sphere and obtain their best constants.
Acknowledgements
The first author is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 11601173).
Footnotes
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
The main idea of this paper was proposed by XS. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Xiaomei Sun, Email: xmsunn@mail.hzau.edu.cn.
Fan Pan, Email: 631172907@qq.com.
References
- 1.Xiao Y. Some Hardy inequalities on the sphere. J. Math. Inequal. 2016;10:793–805. doi: 10.7153/jmi-10-64. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Baras P, Goldstein JA. The heat equation with a singular potential. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 1984;284:121–139. doi: 10.1090/S0002-9947-1984-0742415-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Brezis H, Vázquez JL. Blow-up solutions of some nonlinear elliptic problems. Rev. Mat. Univ. Complut. Madr. 1997;10:443–469. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Garcia Azorero J, Peral I. Hardy inequalities and some critical elliptic and parabolic problems. J. Differ. Equ. 1998;144:441–476. doi: 10.1006/jdeq.1997.3375. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kombe I. The linear heat equation with a highly singular, oscillating potential. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 2004;132:2683–2691. doi: 10.1090/S0002-9939-04-07392-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Vázquez JL, Zuazua E. The Hardy constant and the asymptotic behaviour of the heat equation with an inverse-square potential. J. Funct. Anal. 2000;173:103–153. doi: 10.1006/jfan.1999.3556. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Adriano L, Xia C. Hardy type inequalities on complete Riemannian manifolds. Monatshefte Math. 2011;163:115–129. doi: 10.1007/s00605-010-0220-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.do Carmo MP, Xia C. Complete manifolds with non-negative Ricci curvature and the Caffarelli-Kohn-Nirenberg inequalities. Compos. Math. 2004;140:818–826. doi: 10.1112/S0010437X03000745. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Xia C. The Gagliardo-Nirenberg inequalities and manifolds of non-negative Ricci curvature. J. Funct. Anal. 2005;224:230–241. doi: 10.1016/j.jfa.2004.11.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Du F, Mao J. Hardy and Rellich type inequalities on metric measure spaces. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2015;429:354–365. doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2015.04.021. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Carron G. Inégalités de Hardy sur les variétés Riemanniennes non-compactes. J. Math. Pures Appl. 1997;76:883–891. doi: 10.1016/S0021-7824(97)89976-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Grillo G. Hardy and Rellich-type inequalities for metrics defined by vector fields. Potential Anal. 2003;18:187–217. doi: 10.1023/A:1020963702912. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kombe I, Özaydin M. Improved Hardy and Rellich inequalities on Riemannian manifolds. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 2009;361:6191–6203. doi: 10.1090/S0002-9947-09-04642-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.D’Ambrosio L, Dipierro S. Hardy inequalities on Riemannian manifolds and applications. Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré, Anal. Non Linéaire. 2014;31:449–475. doi: 10.1016/j.anihpc.2013.04.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Yang Q, Su D, Kong Y. Hardy inequalities on Riemannian manifolds with negative curvature. Commun. Contemp. Math. 2014;16 doi: 10.1142/S0219199713500430. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Gallot S, Hulin D, Lafontaine J. Riemannian Geometry. Berlin: Springer; 2004. [Google Scholar]
