Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 May 18.
Published in final edited form as: J Phys Chem B. 2017 May 3;121(19):4968–4980. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.7b01838

Prehydrated One-Electron Attachment to Azido-Modified Pentafuranoses: Aminyl Radical Formation, Rapid H-Atom Transfer and Subsequent Ring Opening

Mukesh Mudgal a, Sunny Rishi b, Daniel A Lumpuy a, Keaton A Curran b, Kathryn Lynn Verley b, Adam J Sobczak a, Thao P Dang a, Natasha Sulimoff a, Anil Kumar b, Michael D Sevilla b,*, Stanislaw F Wnuk a,*, Amitava Adhikary b,*
PMCID: PMC5488683  NIHMSID: NIHMS870426  PMID: 28425714

Abstract

Methyl 2-azido-2-deoxy-α-D-lyxofuranoside (1a) and methyl 2-azido-2-deoxy-β-D-ribofuranoside (2) were prepared from D-xylose or D-arabinose, respectively. Employing ESR and DFT/B3LYP/6-31G* calculations, we investigated (i) aminyl radical (RNH•) formation and (ii) reaction pathways of RNH•. Prehydrated electron attachment to 1a and 2 at 77 K produced transient azide anion radical (RN3) which reacts via rapid N2 loss at 77 K, forming nitrene anion radical (RN•). Rapid protonation of RN• at 77 K formed RNH• and OH. 15N-labeled-1a confirmed this mechanism. Investigations employing in-house synthesized site-specifically deuterated derivatives of 1a (e.g., CH3 (1b), C4 (1c), and C5 (1d)) established that: (a) a facile intramolecular H-atom transfer from C5 to RNH• generated C5• and RNH2. C5• formation had a small deuterium kinetic isotope effect suggesting that this reaction does not occur via direct H-atom abstraction. (b) Subsequently, C5• underwent a facile unimolecular conversion to ring-opened C4• under a reductive environment. Identification of ring-opened C4• intermediate confirms the mechanism of C5′• mediated unaltered base release associated with DNA-strand break. However, for 2, ESR studies established thermally-activated intermolecular H-atom abstraction by RNH• from methyl group at C1. Thus, sugar ring configuration strongly influence site and pathways of RNH• mediated reactions in pentafuranoses.

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name nihms870426u1.jpg

Introduction

The aminyl radical, RNH•, is an important radical in the chemistry of biomolecules such as nucleic acids.14 Nucleic acid (DNA/RNA)-base-nitrogen centered radicals, such as, exocyclic aminyl radicals (RNH•), are often formed via deprotonation of either purine or pyrimidine base cation radicals (or holes).418 This conclusion is well-supported by electron spin resonance (ESR) spectral studies at low temperature,418 and by pulse radiolysis, flash photolysis along with product analyses studies in aqueous solutions at ambient temperature.1929 In addition, our ESR studies showed that RNH• plays an important role in the prototropic equilibria of DNA-base delocalized π-cation radicals515 (such as, guanine cation radical,59 cytosine cation radical,1012 adenine cation radical1315). Pulse radiolysis and product analyses studies established that hydroxyl radical (•OH) can produce the same delocalized π-type RNH• in purines, via either •OH addition to the C4=C5 double bond along with subsequent water elimination or by direct abstraction.4,5,1929

We have recently observed that in azido-substituted nucleosides, in which the azido group is substituted at selective sites in pentafuranose sugar, e.g., in 3′-azidothymidine (3′-AZT),30 2′-azido-2′-deoxyuridine (2′-AZdU),31 4′-azido-2′-deoxycytidine (4′-AZ-2′-dC),32 radiation-mediated prehydrated electrons33 lead to a localized N-centered neutral aminyl radical (T(C3′)-NH•) production at the C3′-site, C2′-site, and at the C4′-site of sugar moiety respectively. The mechanism of RNH• formation is illustrated in scheme 1 below. Formation of nitrene anion radical (RN•) occurs via prompt N2 loss from the highly unstable azide anion radical (RN3). Subsequently, rapid protonation of RN• leads to RNH• formation.30

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Neutral aminyl radical, T(C3′)-NH•, formation from 3′-AZT via one-electron reduction due to radiation-produced prehydrated electrons.30

Apart from recombination to form hydrazine derivatives, RNH• can undergo various reactions.14,12,23,30,3439 Our ESR studies have demonstrated that in 3′-AZT, RNH• abstracts a H-atom either from the methyl group at C5 in a thymine base to give the allylic dUCH2• (ca. 55%) or from the C5′-atom of a proximate 3′-AZT to give C5′• (ca. 35%).30 In cytosine derivatives, RNH• has been shown to undergo electrophilic addition to C5=C6 double bond.4,12,23,3738 In addition, the deprotonated cytosine π cation-radical (neutral aminyl radical) tautomerizes to the iminyl (σ-) radical.12

It is evident from our results that in nucleosides, e.g. in 3′-AZT, the predominant site of attack of RNH• is at the base and not at the pentafuranose sugar moiety.30 Our results in 3′-AZT30 do also show that RNH• causes H-atom abstraction from the sugar moiety. Therefore, to isolate and to establish the nature (i.e., intramolecular or intermolecular) of H-atom abstraction pathway by RNH• from the pentafuranose sugar moiety, we employ methyl 2-azido-2-deoxy-α-D-lyxofuranoside (1-Me-2-Azlyxo, 1a) as well as methyl 2-azido-2-deoxy-β-D-ribofuranoside (1-Me-2-Azribo, 2) as abasic model compounds (see Scheme 2) in this work. It is expected that upon one-electron reduction, 1-Me-2-Azlyxo and 1-Me-2-Azribo will similarly lead to the formation of a localized N-centered RNH• (i.e., 1-Me-(C2)-NH• and 1-Me-(rC2)-NH• respectively, see scheme 3).

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2

Structures of methyl 2-azido-2-deoxy-α-D-lyxofuranoside (1-Me-2-Azlyxo, 1a) and methyl 2-azido-2-deoxy-β-D-ribofuranoside (1-Me-2-Azribo, 2). The atom numbering schemes are also presented here.

Scheme 3.

Scheme 3

Structures of RNH• - T(C3′)-14NH• from 3′-AZT, 1-Me-(C2)-14NH• from 1a, and 1-Me-(rC2)-14NH• from 2. Please note that in nucleoside systems including, for example, the nucleoside aminyl radical (T(C3′)-14NH•), the sugar atoms are denoted with a prime to distinguish them from the numbered atoms of the nitrogenous bases.

C5′• is a well-established precursor of DNA strand breaks and of associated unaltered base release.4, 23 The ring-opened C4′• has been proposed as an intermediate in the well-accepted mechanism of C5′• mediated unaltered base release.4 Therefore, to test this mechanism, we report stereoselective synthesis of 1a, 2 as well as 15N-labeled 1-Me-2-Azlyxo ([15N]-1a) where the terminal N-atom of the azido group was 15N enriched by 99.9%. In addition, we report stereoselective syntheses of 1a derivatives having site-specifically deuterium labeling at the methyl group (1b), at C4 (1c), and at C5 (1d). These syntheses allow for unambiguous electron spin resonance (ESR) characterization of 1-Me-(rC2)-NH• as well as 1-Me-(C2)-NH• produced upon radiation-mediated one-electron attachment. Our ESR studies in 1a–d and theoretical investigations of C5• formation in 1a established that: (a) 1-Me-(C2)-N• reacted with surrounding water and produced OH at the vicinity of a C5-H atom along with 1-Me-(C2)-NH• at 77 K. Via a facile H-atom transfer reaction from C5 to 1-Me-(C2)-NH•, C5• was formed along with 1-Me-(C2)-NH2. (b) Subsequently, C5• converted rapidly and unimolecularly to the ring-opened C4•. To our knowledge, this study is the first report of ESR characterization of ring-opened C4• under a reductive environment. On the other hand, ESR studies in 2 showed that 1-Me-(rC2)-NH• undergoes thermally-activated intermolecular H-atom abstraction from the methyl group at C1. These differences in the reaction of RNH• in 1a and in 2 point out that the site of H-atom loss as well as its pathway (RNH• mediated facile intramolecular H-atom transfer or intermolecular H-atom abstraction by RNH•) in pentafuranoses are influenced by the configurations of sugar rings.

Materials and Methods

The synthesis and spectroscopic characterization of methyl 2-azido-2-deoxy-α-D-lyxofuranoside 1a, of the site-specifically deuterated derivatives of 1a (e.g., CH3 (1b), C4 (1c), and C5 (1d)), and of the methyl 2-azido-2-deoxy-β-D-ribofuranoside (2) are described in the Supporting Information. For ESR studies, methods of preparation of homogeneous glassy samples of 1a–d and 2 in 7.5 M LiCl/D2O, γ-irradiation and storage of these glassy samples including the stepwise annealing of these glassy samples are described in the Supporting Information. The ESR equipment and the experimental set-up (field calibration employing Fremy’s salt, microwave power etc.) for recording the ESR spectra at 77 K along with the methods of theoretical calculations are described in the Supporting Information.

Results and Discussion

(A)

1. Synthesis of methyl 2-azido-2-deoxy-α-D-lyxofuranoside and its labeled derivatives

Various derivatives of 2-azidolyxofuranosides studied in this work (1a–d) were prepared employing the modified Fleet and Smith protocol40 (Scheme 4). Briefly, D-xylose 3a was converted in two steps to methyl 3,5-O-isopropylidine-D-xylofuranoside 5a (α/β, 3:2) as reported.41 Treatment of 5a with trifluoromethanesulfonyl chloride (TfCl) and 4-(dimethylamino)pyridine (DMAP) in methylene chloride42 provided 2-O-triflate ester 6a. In this procedure, we obtained 6a in better yield and purity than those following the original one40 which had utilized triflic anhydride in pyridine. Displacement of triflate from 6a with NaN3 in DMF followed by removal of the isopropylidene protection group with AcOH led to the formation of methyl 2-azido-2-deoxy-α-D-lyxofuranoside 1a.40 Displacement of triflate from 6a with [15N]-NaN3 provided 2-[15N]-azido labeled 1a ([15N]-1a). It is noteworthy that similar to the azido substituent in 2′-AZdU, the azido group in 1a is in the trans configuration to H3 and in the cis configuration to H1. However, the azido group in 1a is in the opposite geometric configuration to H4 and H5,5′ in comparison to the azido group in 3′-AZT or 2′-AZdU. Treatment of D-xylose 3a with 0.5% DCl/CD3OD produced methyl-d3 xylofuranoside 4b, which was converted to [2H3]-methyl 2-azido-2-deoxy-α-D-lyxofuranoside, 1b. Subjection of 4-[2H]-D-xylose 3b to the same synthetic sequence yielded [2H3]-methyl 2-azido-2-deoxy-α-D-4-[2H]-lyxofuranoside, 1c. Analogous conversion of commercially available 5-[2H2]-D-xylose, 4c, gave [2H3]-methyl 2-azido-2-deoxy-α-D-5-[2H2]-lyxofuranoside, 1d.

Scheme 4.

Scheme 4

Reagents (a) 0.5%HCl/CH3OH or 0.5%DCl/CD3OD; (b) (CH3)2CO/conc. H2SO4; (c)TfCl/DMAP/CH2Cl2; (d) NaN3 or [15N]-NaN3/DMF; (e) AcOH/H2O (7:3)

2. Synthesis of methyl 2-azido-2-deoxy-β-D-ribofuranoside, 2

The methyl 2-azidoribofuranoside43 (2) was prepared from D-arabinose 8 employing an approach depicted in Scheme 5. Shortly, silylation of methyl D-arabinofuranoside44 9 with 1,3-dichloro-1,1,3,3-tetraisopropyldisiloxane (TIPDSCl) gave separable mixture of 3,5-di-O-TIPDS protected α and β anomers of 10.45 Treatment of β-anomer of 10 with TfCl/DMAP in methylene chloride42 provided 2-O-triflate ester 11. Displacement of triflate from 11 with NaN3 in DMF followed by removal of the silyl protection groups from 12 with TBAF afforded 2. It is noteworthy that azido group in 2 is in trans configuration to H3 and cis configuration to H1 as in lyxo analogue 1a and 2′-AZdU but it is in the opposite geometric configuration to H4 and H5,5′ as compared to 1a.

Scheme 5.

Scheme 5

Reagents (a) 0.5%HCl/CH3OH; (b) TIPDSCl/pyridine; (c) TfCl/DMAP/CH2Cl2; (d) NaN3/DMF; (e) TBAF

(B) Identification of Radicals by ESR

1. Characterization of neutral aminyl radical (RNH•) formed from 2-azido-2-deoxy-α-D-lyxofuranoside sugar via one-electron reduction

In this work, we investigated the one-electron reduction of methyl 2-azido-2-deoxy-α-D-lyxofuranoside (1-Me-2-Azlyxo, 1a). From our previous work on one-electron reduction of 3′-AZT (see Scheme 1),30 we expect that 1a will produce RNH• (i.e., 1-Me-(C2)-NH•, scheme 3). In scheme 3, the N-atom at the aminyl radical site is the most abundant naturally stable 14N isotope. From our already reported assignment of T(C3′)-14NH• in 3′-AZT,30 it is evident that the major HFCC values in 1-Me-(C2)-14NH• are from three sources - the aminyl N-atom, the exchangeable hydrogen at aminyl radical site (N-H/N-D) and the hydrogen at C2 (H2).

In Figure 1(A), we present the ESR spectrum (purple) due to the reaction of radiation-produced prehydrated electron with 1a with 14N substitution at 77 K. This spectrum was also recorded at 77 K in aqueous glassy (7.5 M LiCl/D2O) samples of 1-Me-2-Azlyxo. Analysis of Figure 1(A) shows triplet from an axially symmetric anisotropic aminyl nitrogen HFCC (Azz = 41 G, Axx = Ayy = 0 G) and a large central doublet (ca. 49 G) due to the isotropic β-proton HFCC from H2- atom. The g-values also show anisotropy: g|| = 2.0020 and g=2.0043 (see Table 1 and Supporting Information Figure S1). Employing these HFCC and g-values, taking into account of the anisotropic deuterium coupling from the exchangeable NH site (schemes 1 and 2) as (3.5, 0, 6) G, using an isotropic linewidth = 10 G and a mixed (Lorentzian/Gaussian =1) lineshape, we simulated the purple spectrum in Figure 1(A). The simulated spectrum (red) is superimposed on the experimentally obtained spectrum (purple) in Figure 1(A). Based on the excellent match of the experimental and the simulated spectra and on the HFCC values, we assign the purple spectrum in Figure 1(A) to RNH•, 1-Me-(C2)-ND•.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

ESR spectrum at 77 K of 1-Me-(C2)-ND• which was formed via radiation (60Co γ) -produced prehydrated electron (absorbed dose = 500 Gy) at 77 K in aqueous glassy (7.5 M LiCl/D2O) sample of (A) unlabeled 1-Me-2-Azlyxo (1a), purple color, and of (B) [15N]-1a, blue color. The simulated spectra (red) (for simulation parameters, see text) are superimposed on the experimentally recorded spectra. All spectra were recorded at 77 K.

The three reference markers (open triangles) in this Figure and in other Figures show position of Fremy’s salt resonances with the central marker at g = 2.0056. Each of these markers is separated from each other by 13.09 G.

Table 1.

Hyperfine couplings for radicals and g-value of the aminyl radicals along with the hyperfine couplings of carbon-centered radicals found in 1-Me-2-Azlyxo (1a) and its derivatives as well as in 1-Me-2-Azribo (2)

Compound Radicals and their experimental HFCC in Gauss (G) g-value of the aminyl radical (exp)
1-Me-2-Azlyxo (1a) 1-Me-(C2)-ND• C5• C4• -OCH2 g|| = 2.0020g=2.0043
H2(1 β-H) 49
N (0, 0, 41.0)a
C5-H (α-H)
ca. 21
C4-H (α-H)
ca. (−8, −21, −30)
C3-H (β-H)
ca. 30
-
1-CD3-2-Azlyxo (1b) H2(β-H) 49 G
N (0, 0, 41.0)a
C5-H (α-H)
ca. 21 G
C4-H (α-H)
ca. (−8, −21, −30)
C3-H (β-H)
ca. 30
-
[5,5-D,D]-1-CD3-2-Azlyxo (1d) H2(β-H) 49
N (0, 0, 41.0)a
-b C4-H (α-H)
ca. (−8, −21, −30)
C3-H (β-H)
ca. 30
-
[4-D]-1-CD3-2Azlyxo (1c) H2(β-H) 49
N (0, 0, 41.0)a
C5-H (α-H)
ca. 21
C3-H (β-H)
ca. 30 Gc
-
1-Me-2-Azribo (2) H2(β-H) 46.2 to 50
N (0, 0, 41.6 to 43)a
- - 1 αH (Azz = 21.6, Ayy = 20.9), 1 αH (Azz = 20.7, Ayy = 31.5)d
a

The HFCC value of N-D (α-deuteron) = (3.5, 0, 6) G is taken from ref. 30

b

The anisotropic doublet of ca. 21 G due to C5-H (α-H) collapses to a singlet upon deuteration at C5 (see Figure 3).

c

The anisotropic α-H due to C4-H collapses upon deuteration at C4 (see Figure 4).

d

The experimentally obtained Azz and Ayy values of hyperfine coupling constant.

To make this assignment of 1-Me-(C2)-ND• unequivocal, we employed a matched sample of 15N-incorporated 1-Me-2-Azlyxo, [15N]-1a, in which the terminal N-atom of the azido group was 99.9% 15N labeled. This [15N]-1a resulted in the formation of ca. 50% 1-Me-(C2)-15ND• and 50% 1-Me-(C2)-14ND•. Therefore, subtraction of 50% of spectrum 1(A) from the experimentally obtained 77 K ESR spectrum of the matched sample of [15N]-1a (see supporting information Figure S2) led to the blue spectrum presented in Figure 1(B).

The simulated spectrum (red, Figure 1(B)) was obtained by employing the anisotropic 15N-atom HFCC (57.6, 0, 0) G and the same HFCC values of (i) anisotropic α-D (N-D), (ii) isotropic β-proton HFCC from H2-proton, along with the same mixed Lorentzian/Gaussian (1/1) linewidth, and the same anisotropic g-values. The ratio of Azz value of 15N (57.6 G) to that of 14N (41.0 G) was found to be 1.404. This value is equal to the gyromagnetic ratio 15N/14N.6 The gyromagnetic ratio of 15N/14N =1.404 produced the larger 15N coupling but with a 15N spin of ½ instead of 1 for 14N.6 The good fit between blue and red spectra in Figure 1(B) confirms that blue spectrum in Figure 1(B) results from 1-Me-(C2)-15ND•. These results also established that, 1a, upon one-electron reduction at 77 K, followed the reactions shown in scheme 1 to produce the neutral aminyl radical, 1-Me-(C2)-ND•, at 77 K (scheme 6).

Scheme 6.

Scheme 6

Formation of neutral aminyl radical (1-Me-(C2)-NH•) from 1-Me-2-Azlyxo, 1a, via one-electron reduction due to radiation-produced prehydrated electrons.

We note that the 14N HFCC values (41, 0, 0) G of 1-Me-(C2)-14ND• (Table 1) are quite close to the corresponding HFCC values (37.5, 0, 0) G of T(C3′)-14ND• from 3′-AZT.30 In Table 1 below, we summarize our results on experimental hyperfine couplings and g-values of the neutral aminyl radical along with the hyperfine couplings of carbon-centered radicals from 1-Me-2-Azlyxo (1a), its deuterated derivatives (1b1d) as well as from 1-Me-2-Azribo (2).

2. Subsequent reactions of 1-Me-(C2)-NH•

(I) 1-Me-(C2)-NH• does not react with the methyl moiety of OCH3 at C1 in 1a

1-Me-(C2)-NH• may abstract an H-atom from the methyl moiety at C1 or from various sites (e.g., C1 to C5) of the sugar moiety in 1a. To test the feasibility of reaction of 1-Me-(C2)-NH• with the methyl moiety at C1, neutral aminyl radicals were produced in matched samples of 1a and [2H3]-methyl 2-azido-2-deoxy-α-d-lyxofuranoside (1b, 1-CD3-2-Azlyxo) via reactions presented in scheme 6. Subsequently, these samples were progressively annealed to ca. 160 K to follow the reactions of site-specifically generated aminyl radicals (1-Me-(C2)-NH• / 1-CD3-(C2)-NH•). The results are presented in Figure 2 below.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

ESR spectra obtained from matched samples (5 mg / ml in 7.5 M LiCl/D2O (pH/pD ca. 5)) of 1a (black) and of 1b (blue): (A) 1-Me-(C2)-NH• formation via radiation-produced (absorbed dose = 500 Gy) prehydrated electron attachment at 77 K. Spectra (B) to (D) demonstrate subsequent reactions of 1-Me-(C2)-NH• via annealing from 77 K to ca. 160 K leading to the formation of ring-opened C4• via C5•. Spectra (C) contain line components due to ring-opened C4• in Figure 2(D) and of central doublet due to C5• in Figure 2(B) as shown by dotted lines (see scheme 7, vide infra). All spectra were recorded at 77 K.

It is evident from Figure 2 that samples of 1a and 1b resulted in very similar ESR spectra. These similarities lead to following conclusions:

  1. ESR spectra shown in Figure 2(A) clearly establish that deuteration of methyl group at the anomeric C-atom does not affect formation or hyperfine couplings of the neutral aminyl radical (see Table 1). Thus, one-electron reduction of either 1a or 1b leads to the same aminyl radicals having identical conformations.

  2. Annealing of these samples at 140 K for 15 min resulted in a central anisotropic doublet of ca. 21 G (see Figure 2(B)). 70% subtraction of the black spectrum in Figure 2(A) (also in supporting information Figure S3(B)) from the spectrum of 1a sample after annealing at 145 K for 15 min and recorded at 77 K (black spectrum, supporting information Figure S3(A)) led to isolation of the ca. 21 G anisotropic doublet (supporting information Figure S3(C)). This anisotropic doublet of ca. 21 G is due to an anisotropic α-H (e.g., C5′-H).5,14,4651 An established anisotropic doublet spectrum due to C5′• (anisotropic α-H (C5′-H) = ca. 21 G (see Table 1), red, supporting information Figure S3(C)) obtained via photo-excitation of adenine cation radical (A•+) in the glassy (7.5 M LiCl/D2O) sample of 3′-dAMP at the native pH (ca. 5) 5,14,48 is superimposed on this isolated anisotropic doublet. The spectral similarities (total hyperfine splitting, lineshape, and the g-value at the center) of the central anisotropic doublet with those of the established anisotropic doublet C5′• spectrum (Figure S3(C)), led us to tentatively assign the central anisotropic doublet to C5• (for confirmatory C5• assignment, see Figure 3(B)). These spectral similarities further point out that the C5• formed in 1a has the same intact furanose ring conformation as that of the C5′• found in our previous studies of DNA and RNA-nucleosides and -tides.5,14,4651

  3. Subsequent stepwise annealing of these samples to 160 K (Figures 2(C) and 2(D)) led to the simultaneous loss of line components at the wings owing to the nitrogen atom of aminyl radical and of the central doublet of ca. 21 G. At 160 K, development of a new radical spectrum (Figure 2(D)) was found to be the same for 1a and 1b. The g-value at the center of either black or blue spectrum in Figure 2(D) corresponds to that of a C-centered radical5,14,48 (supporting information Figure S4). From these findings, we have concluded that site of this particular radical formed owing to reaction of C5• in lyxofuranose is not located on the OCD3 / OCH3 group at C1. While, this radical site could be at C3, or at C4, or at C5 of the furanoside ring, our work presented below show that each spectrum shown in Figure 2(D) results from the ring-opened C4• (see Figure 4 for this assignment).

    The Spectra in Figure 2(C) also contain line components due to ring-opened C4• in Figure 2(D) as well as of the central doublet due to C5• in Figure 2(B) as shown by the dotted lines. Therefore, both spectra in Figure 2(C) result from a cohort of ring-opened C4• and C5• with furanose ring. On this basis, the spectra in Figure 2(C) are assigned to the C5• with an intact furanose ring, and the ring-opened C4• (Table 1 and Scheme 7, vide infra). The reaction from C5• to the ring-opened C4• is caught at this temperature.

  4. Formation of C-centered radicals in spectra 2(C) and 2(D) is further supported by annealing studies of a matched sample of [15N]-1a. This sample resulted in spectra having similar total hyperfine splitting, similar center, and similar lineshapes to those shown in Figures 2(B) to 2(D) (supporting information Figure S5).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

ESR spectra obtained from matched samples (5 mg / ml in 7.5 M LiCl/D2O (pH/pD ca. 5)) of 1b (black) and of 1d (blue) showing neutral aminyl radical formation via (A) 60Co γ-radiation-produced (absorbed dose = 500 Gy) prehydrated electron attachment at 77 K. Spectra (B) to (D) represent the subsequent reactions of the aminyl radical via progressive annealing from 77 K to ca. 160 K. ESR Spectra shown in (A) to (D) were recorded at 77 K.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

ESR spectra obtained from matched samples (5 mg / mL in 7.5 M LiCl/D2O (pH/pD ca. 5)) of 1-CD3-2-Azlyxo (1b, black) and of ([4-D]-1-CD3-2Azlyxo (1c, blue) showing neutral aminyl radical formation via (A) 60Co γ-radiation-produced (absorbed dose = 500 Gy) prehydrated electron attachment at 77 K. Spectra (B) to (E) represent the subsequent reactions of the aminyl radical via progressive annealing from 77 K to ca. 170 K. ESR Spectra shown in (A) to (E) were recorded at 77 K. Spectrum (E, red) is the simulated spectrum of ring-opened C4• (for simulation parameters, see text).

Scheme 7.

Scheme 7

Facile unimolecular formation of thermodynamically stable ring-opened C4• via ring opening of a C5• intermediate in [5,5-D,D]-1-CD3-2-Azlyxo (1d). C5• production is shown to occur via facile intramolecular H-atom transfer at C5 by the neutral aminyl radical, [5,5-D,D]-1-CD3-(C2)-NH•.

(II) Intramolecular H-atom abstraction at C5 by 1-Me-(C2)-NH• leads to C5• formation in 1a

X-ray crystallography52 and NMR studies53 have shown that in lyxofuranose, the 2-OH and one of the two C5-H atoms are in axial conformation. In 2-azidolyxofuranoses, the 2-OH is substituted by a 2-azido group; as a result, the 2-azido and one of the two C5-H atoms are expected to be in axial conformation. Consequently, the aminyl radical N-atom would be proximate to one of the two C5-H atoms. Therefore, we posed two questions: (a) can the neutral aminyl radical (1-Me-(C2)-ND•) cause H-atom abstraction from C5, and (b) whether this H-atom abstraction reaction is intramolecular or intermolecular in nature?

In order to provide an answer to these questions, we employed matched samples of 1-CD3-2-Azlyxo (1b) and [2H3]-methyl 2-azido-2-deoxy-α-D-5-[2H2]-lyxofuranoside (1d, [5,5-D,D]-1-CD3-2-Azlyxo). Results are presented in Figure 3.

Following spectral assignments in Figures 1 and in 2(A), the spectrum in blue in Figure 3(A) is assigned to [5,5-D,D]-1-CD3-(C2)-ND• while the spectrum in black in Figure 3(A) is already assigned to 1-CD3-(C2)-ND•. Similarities of spectra shown in Figures 1, 2(A) and 3(A) establish that deuteration at C5 in 1d does not lead to any observable effect on spectra of these aminyl radicals. Therefore, aminyl radicals having identical conformations are produced from 1b, 1d, and from the remaining 1a samples upon one-electron reduction.

Via annealing from 77 K to 140 K, the central anisotropic doublet of ca. 21 G found from 1a and 1b samples due to an α-proton (spectra 2(B) and the black spectrum Figure 3(B)) collapses to a singlet in the blue spectrum from 1d (Figure 3(B) and Table 1). Comparison of aminyl radical spectrum in Figures 1, 2(A), and 3(A) with the central singlet in Figure 3(B) shows that this singlet is not associated with remaining aminyl radical, as it differs considerably in lineshape and in the g-value at the center.

Collapse of the central doublet of ca. 21 G to a singlet in 1d (Figure 3(B), blue spectrum) but not in 1a (Figure 2(B)), 1b (Figures 2(B), 3(B)), and in [2H3]-methyl 2-azido-2-deoxy-α-D-4-[2H]-lyxofuranoside (1c, [4-D]-1-CD3-2-Azlyxo) (Figure 4(B), vide infra) unequivocally confirms our tentative assignment of the ca. 21 G central doublet spectrum to C5• with intact furanose ring. From the yields of C5• in 5-protonated (1a or 1b) versus that of 5-D-C5• in 5-deuterated (1d), we estimated a small deuterium kinetic isotope effect for the formation of C5• of ca. 1.3±0.3. This small value of deuterium kinetic isotope effect of RNH• mediated C5• production suggests that C5• formation does not occur via direct H-atom abstraction from C5 by the aminyl radical. Moreover, in our system of homogeneous glassy solutions at low temperature, H-atom abstraction reaction has been observed to happen near the glass transition temperature (ca. 160 – 170 K) for 2 (see Figure 5(D) (this work)), for 3′-AZT and 5′-AZT30, for esters and triglycerides54, and for amide electron adducts55. By temperature increase from 77 to ca. 140 K, the glass does not soften significantly to allow migration of RNH• to C5 for causing H-atom abstraction. Therefore, based on these results, we conclude that in 2-azidolyxofuranose, C5• formation does not occur via direct H-atom abstraction by RNH• from C5; rather, C5• production occurs via facile intamolecular H-atom transfer from C5 to RNH• forming C5• and RNH2 (see section (C)). C5• results in the central anisotropic doublet of ca. 21 G owing to the α-hydrogen at C5 of C5• with furanose ring.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

ESR spectra (black) obtained from 2 (5.4 mg / mL in 7.5 M LiCl/D2O (pH/pD ca. 5)) showing neutral aminyl radical formation via (A) 60Co γ-radiation-produced (absorbed dose = 500 Gy) prehydrated electron attachment at 77 K. Spectra (B) to (D) represent the subsequent reactions of the aminyl radical via progressive annealing from 77 K to ca. 160 K. ESR Spectra in black shown in (A) to (D) were recorded at 77 K. Spectrum (D, black) is assigned to -OCH2• formed via intermolecular H-atom abstraction from the methoxy group at C1 by 1-Me-(rC2)-ND•. The simulated spectrum (red) is superimposed on each experimentally recorded spectrum (black) (for simulation parameters, see text).

Further annealing of samples to 150 K for 15 min led to spectra shown in Figure 3(C). These spectra, in comparison to those in Figure 3(B), do not have the line components due to the aminyl radical. However, the spectrum in black in Figure 3(C) matches very well with each of the spectra shown in Figure 2(C). Following this spectral similarity and as per our assignment to the spectra shown in Figure 2(C), we assigned the central doublet of the black spectrum in Figure 3(C) to C5•. The remaining line components of the black spectrum in Figure 3(C) are due to ring-opened C4• (Figure 4, vide infra). Collapse of the central doublet in the black spectrum to a singlet in the blue spectrum in Figure 3(C) does: (a) unequivocally establish presence of C5• in the radical cohort in Figures 2(C) and 3(C), and, (b) support our interpretation that the spectra in Figure 2(C) and 3(C) represent the facile conversion of C5• with furanose ring to the much more thermodynamically favorable ring-opened C4• (see Table 1, Figure 4 and scheme 7). This facile ring opening occurred between 150 K and 160 K under our experimental conditions of supercooled homogeneous aqueous solution.

Similarities in ESR spectra shown in Figures 2(D) and 3(D) establish that these spectra are due to the same radical, ring-opened C4• (see Figure 4 and scheme 7, vide infra).

Nature of H-atom transfer from C5 leading to C5• formation

Increasing the concentration (0.5 to 10 mg/mL in 7.5 M LiCl/D2O) of 1a did not show any observable effect on the extent of C5• formation from spectra recorded under the same microwave power, modulation, and gain (see supporting information Figure S6). From these results, we conclude that C5• formation observed in these lyxofuranoside samples occur via facile RNH• mediated intramolecular H-atom transfer (see scheme 7).

(III) C5• in 1a and in its various derivatives converts unimolecularly to the ring-opened C4•

Our ESR studies shown in Figures 2(D) and 3(D) as well as in supporting information Figures S4, S5(D), and S6(D) clearly demonstrate that the site of final radical formed via C5•, could be on C3, or on C4, or on C5 of the furanoside ring. To shed light on it, we employed matched samples of 1-CD3-2-Azlyxo, 1b, and [2H3]-methyl 2-azido-2-deoxy-α-D-4-[2H]-lyxofuranoside (1c, [4-D]-1-CD3-2-Azlyxo). Results are presented in Figure 4.

Comparing the spectra in Figure 4(A) with those in Figures 1, 2(A), and 3(A) we assign the spectrum in blue in Figure 4(A) to the neutral aminyl radical, [4-D,D]-1-CD3-(C2)-ND•. The spectrum in black in Figure 4(A) is the same black spectrum in Figure 3(A), which is due to 1-CD3-(C2)-ND•. Analyses of these spectra clearly show that deuteration at C4 in [4-D]-1-CD3-2-Azlyxo did not affect the spectra of aminyl radicals.

Via annealing from 77 K to 140 K, spectra in Figure 4(B) show that the central doublet of ca. 21 G, which is due to C5•, remains unaffected in 1-CD3-2-Azlyxo (1b, black) and in [4-D]-1-CD3-2-Azlyxo (1c, blue) samples. Therefore, comparison of spectra in Figure 4(B) with those in Figure 3(B) clearly show that hydrogen at C4 which is at beta position to the radical site in C5•, does not show observable proton hyperfine coupling with the radical site (see section (C)).

Further annealing of samples to 150 K for 15 min led to spectra shown in Figure 4(C). Comparison of spectra in Figure 4(C) with those in Figure 2(C) and 3(C) show that only the blue spectrum from 1c sample is a doublet but all remaining spectra in Figures 4(C) and 3(C) are similar multiplets and a cohort of ring-opened C4• and unconverted C5•. Since C5• spectrum is a doublet (ca. 21 G, vide supra), the ring-opened 4-D-C4• spectrum from the 1c sample will show a doublet spectrum only if the C3-H proton shows an observable beta hyperfine coupling with the ring C4-radical site whereas the alpha hydrogen hyperfine coupling due to C4-H collapses upon deuteration at C4.

Subsequent annealing of samples to 160 K for 15 min led to spectra shown in Figure 4(D). Comparison of spectra in Figure 4(D) with those in Figures 2(D) and 3(D) show that only the blue spectrum from 1c sample has a doublet (ca. 30 G) but all remaining spectra in Figures 2(D) and 3(D) have similar anisotropic triplets which originate from one anisotropic alpha hydrogen HFCC ((−8.0, −21.0, −30.0) G) and one near-isotropic beta hydrogen HFCC of ca. 30 G (see Table 1). As expected for the ring-opened C4•, deuterium substitution at C4 removes the anisotropic alpha H-coupling leaving only the 30 G beta proton HFCC. Further, the results presented in Figures 2 to 4 show that site-specific deuteration at C5 (Figure 3) and that at the methyl group in 1a (Figure 2) do not affect the spectra of the final radical. On this basis, we assign the anisotropic alpha hydrogen HFCC to C4-H and the isotropic beta hydrogen HFCC of ca. −30 G to C3-H. Further annealing of 1b sample to ca. 170 K for 15 min resulted in the black spectrum in Figure 4(E). Employing the anisotropic alpha hydrogen HFCC ((−8.0, −21.0, −30.0) G) due to C4-H, one near-isotropic beta hydrogen HFCC ((31, 28.0, 27.5) G) due to C3-H, anisotropic g-value (2.0044, 2.0022, 2.0052), and a mixed (Lorentzian/Gaussian =1:1) isotropic linewidth of 5 G, a simulated spectrum (red, Figure 4(E)) was obtained and was superimposed on the experimentally recorded black spectrum. The simulated spectrum in Figure 4(E) matched well with the experimentally recorded one.

These HFCC values match very well with those predicted by theory (B3LYP/PCM/6-31+G*) for a geometry optimized ring-opened C4• system that give one anisotropic alpha hydrogen HFCC due to C4-H (−6.4, −17.8, −24.4) G and one isotropic beta hydrogen HFCC due to C3-H was obtained as 24.3 G (see section (C)). Thus, we assign the spectra in Figures 2(D), 3(D), 4(D), 4(E), as well as in supporting information Figures S4, S5(D), and S6(D) to ring-opened C4•. The C5• to C4• conversion is very facile as it happened between 150 K and 160 K (i.e., within 10 K) under our experimental conditions that employ supercooled homogeneous aqueous solutions at low temperatures.

C5• converts unimolecularly to ring-opened C4•

Increasing the concentration (0.5 to 10 mg/mL in 7.5 M LiCl/D2O) of 1a did not show any observable effect on the extent of ring-opened C4• formation from spectra recorded under the same conditions (see supporting information Figure S6). From these results, we conclude that the C5• with furanoside ring converts unimolecularly to ring-opened C4• (Scheme 7).

Summary of results obtained from 1a and its derivatives

Our ESR spectral studies using matched samples of 1a–d as well as using various concentrations of 1a clearly established that via facile 1-Me-(C2)-ND• mediated intamolecular H-atom transfer from C5, radiation-produced 1-Me-(C2)-ND• converts to C5• with intact furanose ring and 1-Me-(C2)-NH2. Subsequently, this C5• undergoes facile unimolecular conversion to the ring-opened C4• (Scheme 7).

(IV) Intermolecular H-atom abstraction from -OCH3 at C1 by 1-Me-(rC2)-NH• leads to -OCH2• formation in methyl 2-azido-2-deoxy-β-D-ribofuranoside (1-Me-2-Azribo, 2)

The ribofuranose ring in 2′-azidonucleosides/tides is predominantly in the C3-endo conformation.56 Therefore, we posed two questions: (a) In C3-endo conformation, would proximity of H-atom of methoxy group at C1 to the aminyl radical site in 1-Me-(rC2)-NH• allow for H-atom abstraction? And, (b) if H-atom abstraction from the methoxy group at C1 does occur, whether it occurs intramolecularly or intermolecularly? Our work employing 1-Me-2-Azribo (2) sample provides answer to these questions and the results are presented in Figure 5 below.

Comparison of the experimentally recorded spectra (black) presented in Figures 5(A) to 5(C) with those presented in Figures 1, 2(A), 3(A), and 4(A) points out that each black spectrum in Figures 5(A) to 5(C) show the line components of the triplet due to an axially symmetric anisotropic aminyl nitrogen HFCC (Azz = 43.0 G, Axx = Ayy = 0 G (Figure 5(A) and (B), Azz = 41.6 G, Axx = Ayy = 0 G (Figure 5(C))) at the wings and a large central doublet (ca. 46.2 G (Figure 5(A)), ca. 49.2 G (Figure 5(B)), and ca. 50 G (Figure 5(C))) due to the isotropic β-proton HFCC from H2. Each of the black spectra in Figure 5(A) to (C) show the same anisotropic g-values (g|| = 2.0020 and g=2.0043) that are identical to those of 1-Me-(C2)-NH•/1-Me-(C2)-ND• in Figure 1. Employing these HFCC and g-values, taking into account of the anisotropic deuterium coupling from the exchangeable NH site (schemes 2 and 3) as (3.5, 0, 6) G, using an isotropic linewidth = 10 G and a mixed (Lorentzian/Gaussian =1) lineshape, we simulated the black spectrum in Figures 5(A), 5(B), and in 5(C). Based on the excellent match of the experimental and the simulated spectra (red) and on the HFCC values, we assign the black spectrum in Figure 5(A), 5(B), and 5(C) to RNH•, 1-Me-(rC2)-ND•/1-Me-(rC2)-NH•. We also note here that the anisotropic nitrogen HFCC and the isotropic β-proton HFCC from H2- atom show slight change upon worming from 77 to 150 K owing to relaxation of the aminyl radical. Moreover, the HFCC values of the anisotropic aminyl nitrogen (Azz = 41 G, Axx = Ayy = 0 G) and the HFCC values of the isotropic beta C2-H proton (ca. 49 G) of 1-Me-(C2)-NH• are identical to those of the anisotropic aminyl nitrogen in 1-Me-(rC2)-NH•.

Upon annealing the sample to 160 K, the experimentally recorded spectrum at 77 K (black, Figure 5(D)) showed an overall anisotropic triplet (1:2:1); the g-value at the center of this spectrum corresponds to that of a C-centered radical5, 14, 4651 (supporting information Figure S4). This sort of anisotropic 1:2:1 triplet originates owing to two alpha-H couplings in -OCH2•.50,57 The spectrum of -OCH2• has been simulated using the ESR parameters: 1 αH (Axx, Axy, Ayy, Azz = 24.3, 11.1, 20.9, 21.6) G, 1 αH (Axx, Axy, Ayy, Azz = 9.5, 3.1, 31.5, 20.7) G, (gxx, gyy, gzz = 2.0037, 2.0047, 2.0019), and with a mixed (1:1) Lorentzian/Gaussian linewidth (5.0, 5.0, 5.5) G (for determination of the non-diagonal tensor element Axy, see “Electron Spin Resonance” in Materials and Methods in the supporting information. We note here that the diagonal tensor elements Ayy and Azz are experimentally determined (see Table 1)). The simulated spectrum (red, Figure 5(D)) of -OCH2• matches the experimental spectrum (black, Figure 5(D)) quite well. Based upon these results, we have assigned this anisotropic triplet found in -OCH2• spectrum to the two alpha-H hyperfine couplings from the -OCH2 group (scheme 8).

Scheme 8.

Scheme 8

Facile intermolecular formation of thermodynamically stable -OCH2• with intact ribofuranose ring in 1-Me-2-Azribo (2) via H-atom abstraction by 1-Me-(rC2)-NH•.

The -OCH2• formation was found to depend on the concentration of 2. No -OCH2• formation was observed at [2] = 0.9 mg/mL. Thus, contrary to lyxofuarnosides 1a–d, results in Figure 5 established that: (a) 1-Me-(rC2)-ND•/1-Me-(rC2)-NH• mediated -OCH2• formation occurred via facile (i.e., upon warming from ca. 150 K to ca. 160 K) intermolecular H-atom abstraction in high concentration (e.g., 5.4 mg/mL) of 2; (b) the aminyl radical site in C3-endo conformation of 1-Me-(rC2)-ND• (or, 1-Me-(rC2)-NH•) cannot lead to -OCH2• either via intramolecular H-atom abstraction or via 1-Me-(C2)-ND• mediated facile intramolecular H-atom transfer from the sterically inaccessible methoxy group at C1 in its β-anomeric form (scheme 8).

Comparison of results from 1a and its derivatives with those from 2

In summary, 1-Me-(C2)-ND•/1-Me-(C2)-NH• formed in α-anomeric form of 2-azidolyxofuranosides (parent (1a) and derivatives of 1a ([15N-1a], 1b, 1c, and 1d)), owing to its proximity to one of the two C5-H atoms to the aminyl nitrogen radical site, lead to the formation of C5• via facile 1-Me-(C2)-ND• mediated intramolecular H-atom transfer. On the other hand, 1-Me-(rC2)-ND•/1-Me-(rC2)-NH• in β-anomeric ribofuranoside 2 leads to -OCH2• production via intermolecular H-atom abstraction.

(C) Studies employing density functional theory (DFT)

Aminyl radical (1-Me-(C2)-ND•/1-Me-(C2)-NH•)) formation in 2-azidolyxofuranoside via nitrene anion radical intermediate (scheme 6)

At first, we performed geometry optimization of the nitrene anion radical (scheme 6) in the presence of one water molecule including the effect of full solvation employing B3LYP/PCM/6-31+G* method (see Materials and Methods, supporting information). Our calculations show that formation of the aminyl radical is instantaneous by protonation of the nitrene anion radical from the water molecule producing OH (scheme 6 and Figure 6). This validates our observation of robust aminyl radical formation at 77 K in azidosugars (lyxo and ribofuranosides, this work as well as in our previous work30 on 3′-AZT and 5′-AZT). The spin density distribution plot of the aminyl radical shown in Figure 6 establishes that the spin (or, the unpaired electron) is localized on the aminyl nitrogen and is a π-type radical. The B3LYP/PCM/6-31+G* calculated 14N HFCC values were obtained as (42.0, 1.1, 1.3) G. The beta C2-H and exchangeable alpha N-H HFCC value were predicted as 44 G and (−39.2, −1.1, −26.9) G respectively. These theoretically calculated HFCC values agree very well with the corresponding experimentally obtained ones (see Table 1): 14N HFCC = (41.0, 0, 0) G, beta C2-H HFCC = 49 G, and Azz component of alpha NH HFCC = 28 G (see Figure 1 and its discussion). Without constraining this dihedral angle, the beta C2-H HFCC value was found to be 0.2 G i.e., the C2-H beta proton appeared to be in the nodal plane of the aminyl radical site p-orbital. Therefore, to match the experimentally observed beta C2-H HFCC value, beta C2-H HFCC was calculated by constraining the dihedral angle H2-C2-N2-H = 123 deg. We note here that rotation of N-H bond around N2-C2 does not change the total energy of the aminyl radical considerably.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

B3LYP/PCM/6-31+G* Calculated spin densities and relative stabilization energies (in kcal/mol) of the aminyl radical, C5•, and the ring-opened C4• from 1a.

C5• formation in 2-azidolyxofuranoside

The small deuterium kinetic isotope effect found on C5• formation in 5-deuterated 1a (see Figure 3) suggests that C5• formation does not occur via direct H-atom abstraction from C5 by 1-Me-(C2)-ND•. To produce C5•, we moved a proton from C5 to 1-Me-(C2)-ND• and performed full geometry-optimization of the structure (Figure 6, C5•). The spin density distribution plot of C5• shows that the unpaired spin is primarily located on C5-H thereby resulting in substantial anisotropic alpha proton HFCC values of (−3.0, −17.1, −27.0) G and a very small isotropic C4-H beta HFCC value of 2.4 G. Experimentally, the ESR spectrum due to C5• was found to be an anisotropic doublet of ca. 21 G (see Figure 2(B) and 3(B)) due to the anisotropic α-H HFCC at C5. As per our previous work on C5′• formation via photoexcitation of A•+ in dAdo48 and in Ado14, the theoretically calculated (ca. 16 G) and the experimentally obtained (ca. 21 G) anisotropic C5′-alpha proton HFCCs are in good agreement. The very small isotropic beta HFCC due to C4-H proton justifies the aniotropic doublet experimental spectrum and points out that C4-H proton does not couple with the radical site p-orbital. As a result, the C4-proton in C5• should be in the nodal plane of the p-orbital at the radical site. Furthermore, the experimental observations in case of C5• formation - (a) the small value of deuterium kinetic isotope effect and (b) the intramolecular and facile nature at low temperature (between 77 and 140 K) suggest that the rapid H-atom transfer process from C5 to the aminyl radical (1-Me-(C2)-ND•/1-Me-(C2)-NH•) is not a simple H-atom abstraction and does likely involve the OH that was formed initially via protonation of RN• by the surrounding water (see Figure 6). This rapid H-atom transfer could likely be a proton-coupled electron transfer (PCET) process.

Assignment of ring-opened C4• and relative stabilization as well as relative free energies of various radicals

To strengthen the assignments of ESR spectra in Figures 2(D), 3(D), 4(D), 4(E), as well as in supporting information Figures S4, S5(D), and S6(D) to ring-opened C4• (scheme 7), we have performed theoretical calculations. Employing the B3LYP/PCM/6-31+G* method implemented in the Gaussian’09 set of programs,42 geometries of these radicals were optimized and energies were calculated. These optimized geometries, their spin densities, as well as their relative stabilization energies are presented in Figure 6.

Relative stabilization energies as well as relative free energies of aminyl radical, C5• and ring-opened C4• with respect to that of parent aminyl radical (i.e., stabilization energy and free energy of aminyl radical were set as 0.0 kcal/mol), were obtained in kcal/mol as −5.3 (−5.9) and −14.5 (−18.3) respectively. The relative free energy values are mentioned above in parenthesis. Spin density distributions shown in Figure 6 along with above-mentioned relative energies clearly establish that ring-opened C4• should be the thermodynamically most stable radical and theoretically predicted HFCC values of α-H at C4 and β-H at C3 of ring-opened C4• should agree very well with the experimentally obtained hyperfine couplings.

To validate the above theoretical prediction regarding HFCC of ring-opened C4•, the optimized geometry of ring-opened C4• obtained by Spartan’14 58 was used to calculate HFCC values employing DFT/B3LYP/6-31G* method in the gas phase as implemented in Gaussian’09 program set 59. For ring-opened C4•, theoretically calculated one anisotropic alpha hydrogen HFCC due to C4-H was obtained as (−6.4, −17.8, −24.4) G and one isotropic beta hydrogen HFCC due to C3-H was obtained as 24.3 G. The experimental HFCC values were: anisotropic alpha hydrogen HFCC ((−8, −21, −30) G) due to C4-H and one isotropic beta hydrogen HFCC (ca. 30 G) due to C3-H (vide infra, Figure 4). The good match between the experimental and theoretical HFCC values further confirm our assignment of ESR spectra due to ring-opened C4•.

Conclusions

The most significant aspects of this work are:

  1. Unequivocal characterization of radicals: Radicals produced by prehydrated electron attachment to azido substituted lyxofuranosides and ribofuranosides are found to be aminyl radicals in which the radical site is localized to the aminyl nitrogen atom. This work highlights the importance of employing isotopically substituted azido (D, 15N) derivatives and theory to achieve unequivocal characterization of various radical species.

  2. Reactions of aminyl radicals are dependent on the configuration of sugar moiety: We have employed various sugar site-specific isotopically substituted (D, 15N) methyl lyxofuranoside derivatives in this work. These compounds helped us to establish that the aminyl nitrogen radical undergoes aminyl radical mediated facile intramolecular H-atom transfer in α-anomeric lyxofuranoside (1a–d) forming C5•. On the other hand, for the β-anomeric ribofuranoside (2), which is in a C3-endo conformation, the aminyl radical site cannot sterically access either the C5-H atoms or the H-atoms of methoxy group at C1 of the same molecule. As a result, the aminyl radical of the β-anomeric ribofuranoside undergoes intermolecular H-atom abstraction to form the methoxy radical, -OCH2•. The sites of H-atom loss along with the pathways of the reactions (aminyl radical mediated facile intramolecular H-atom transfer vs. intermolecular H-atom abstraction) of aminyl radicals allow us to identify the configurations of these sugar radicals in various pentafuranoses employing ESR spectroscopy and theoretical calculations.

  3. Implication of conversion of C5′• to ring-opened C4′• on the pathways DNA damage: Dizdaroglu and von Sonntag performed GC-MS studies of γ-irradiated N2O-saturated oxygen free aqueous solution of thymidine4,60 and showed that the release of thymine base is correlated with the formation of 2,4-dideoxypentodialdose (scheme 9). Their GC-MS studies of γ-irradiated N2O-saturated oxygen free aqueous solution of glucose reported 5-deoxy-xylo-hexodialdose formation.61, 62

Scheme 9.

Scheme 9

Formation of 2,4-dideoxypentodialdose and thymine base in N2O-saturated and γ-irradiated aqueous solution of thymidine.4, 60

The mechanism of formation of 2,4-dideoxypentodialdose was proposed to occur after formation of C5′• through the ring-opened C4′• intermediate (scheme 9). Our work presents the first evidence of the facile conversion of C5• to ring-opened C4•, and, importantly we are the first to identify the ring-opened C4• intermediate. As a result, our work (scheme 7) confirms the mechanism presented in scheme 9 which shows that C5′• leads to the release of unaltered base in irradiated DNA-model system and DNA itself.4, 60 Moreover, for γ- and for ion-beam irradiated (77 K irradiation) DNA samples with both hole and electron scavengers which isolates the sugar-phosphate backbone radicals,5, 50, 63 our results indicate that at 77 K, the spectrum due to C5′• contributes substantially (ca. 30 to 40%) to the spectrum of sugar-phosphate backbone radical cohort.5, 50 C5′• formation was also previously observed via photoexcitation of guanine and adenine cation radicals in DNA and RNA-models;5,14,4651 however, owing to the presence of K2S2O8 as the radiation-produced electron scavenger in our previous studies 5,14,4651, we could not observe this ring opening reaction of C5′• as it was rapidly oxidized by K2S2O8.

Supplementary Material

Supporting Information

Acknowledgments

We thank the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health (Grants R01CA045424 for MDS, AA, and AK as well as SC1CA138176 for SFW) for support. TPD and NS are grateful to the FIU Graduate School for her Doctoral Evidence Acquisition and NRC-HQ-13-G-38-0017 Fellowship, respectively. AA, AK, and MDS are also thankful to Research Excellence Fund (REF) and Center for Biomedical Research (CBR) at Oakland University for support.

Footnotes

Notes

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supporting Information Available:

Supporting information contains the following: (a) the complete Materials and Methods Section including the synthesis and spectroscopic characterization of methyl 2-azido-2-deoxy-α-D-lyxofuranoside 1a, its labeled derivatives 1a-1d, and of methyl 2-azido-2-deoxy-β-D-ribofuranoside (2); (b) Figure S1: Fits used to estimate error limits of our simulations; (c) Figure S2: Isolation of prehydrated electron-induced RNH•, 1-Me-(C2)-ND• spectrum in 1a, and in [15N]-1a; (d) Figure S3: Isolation of C5• spectrum in 1a; (e) Figure S4: Comparison of ESR spectra of ring-opened C4• and of -OCH2• with that of an authentic carbon-centered radical, C1′•; (f) Figure S5: ESR spectra of matched glassy samples of 1a and of [15N]-1a; (g) Figure S6: ESR spectra of matched glassy samples of 1a ([1a] = 10 mg/mL and 0.5 mg/mL); and (h) B3LYP/PCM/6-31+G* calculated HFCC values that were obtained employing the B3LYP/PCM/6-31+G* optimized geometries of various radicals (aminyl radical, C5•, and ring-opened C4•) in Gaussian’09.

This information is available free of charge via the internet at http://pubs.acs.org/.

References

  • 1.Danen WC, Neugebauer FA. Aminyl Free Radicals. Angew Chem Int Ed. 1975;14:783–789. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Zard SZ. Recent Progress in the Generation and Use of Nitrogen-Centered Radicals. Chem Soc Rev. 2008;37:1603– 1618. doi: 10.1039/b613443m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Rodriguez MA. Light-Induced Iminyl Radicals: Generation and Synthetic Applications. InTech; 2012. pp. 265–282. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.von Sonntag C. Free-Radical-Induced DNA Damage and Its Repair. Springer-Verlag; Berlin, Heidelberg: 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Adhikary A, Becker D, Sevilla MD. Electron Spin Resonance of Radicals in Irradiated DNA. In: Lund A, Shiotani M, editors. Applications of EPR in Radiation Research. Springer International Publishing; Heidelberg, New York, London: 2014. pp. 299–352. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Adhikary A, Kumar A, Becker D, Sevilla MD. The guanine Cation Radical: Investigation of Deprotonation States by ESR and DFT. J Phys Chem B. 2006;110:24170– 24180. doi: 10.1021/jp064361y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Adhikary A, Khanduri D, Sevilla MD. Direct Observation of The Hole Protonation State and Hole Localization Site in DNA-Oligomers. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:8614– 8619. doi: 10.1021/ja9014869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Adhikary A, Kumar A, Munafo SA, Khanduri D, Sevilla MD. Prototropic Equilibria in DNA Containing One-electron Oxidized GC: Intra-duplex vs. Duplex to Solvent Deprotonation. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2010;12:5353– 5368. doi: 10.1039/b925496j. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Khanduri D, Adhikary A, Sevilla MD. Highly Oxidizing Excited States of One-electron Oxidized Guanine in DNA: Wavelength and pH Dependence. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133:4527– 4537. doi: 10.1021/ja110499a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Adhikary A, Kumar A, Rayala R, Hindi RM, Adhikary A, Wnuk SF, Sevilla MD. One-Electron Oxidation of Gemcitabine and Analogs: Mechanism of Formation of C3′ and C2′ Sugar Radicals. J Am Chem Soc. 2014;136:15646– 15653. doi: 10.1021/ja5083156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Adhikary A, Kumar A, Palmer BJ, Todd AD, Heizer AN, Sevilla MD. Reactions of 5-Methylcytosine Cation Radicals in DNA and Model Systems: Thermal Deprotonation From the 5-Methyl Group vs. Excited State Deprotonation From Sugar. Int J Radiat Biol. 2014;90:433– 445. doi: 10.3109/09553002.2014.884293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Adhikary A, Kumar A, Bishop CT, Wiegand TJ, Hindi RM, Adhikary A, Sevilla MD. π-Radical to σ-Radical Tautomerization in One-Electron-Oxidized 1-Methylcytosine and Its Analogs. J Phys Chem B. 2015;119:11496– 11505. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.5b05162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Adhikary A, Kumar A, Khanduri D, Sevilla MD. The Effect of Base Stacking on The Acid-base Properties of The Adenine Cation Radical [A•+] in Solution: ESR and DFT Studies. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:10282– 10292. doi: 10.1021/ja802122s. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Adhikary A, Khanduri D, Kumar A, Sevilla MD. Photo-excitation of Adenine cation radical [A•+] in The Near UV-vis Region Produces Sugar Radicals in Adenosine and in Its Nucleotides. J Phys Chem B. 2008;112:15844– 15855. doi: 10.1021/jp808139e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Banyasz A, Tiia-Maaria K, Muñoz-Losa A, Rishi S, Adhikary A, Sevilla MD, Martinez-Fernandez L, Improta R, Markovitsi D. UV-Induced Adenine Radicals Induced in DNA A-Tracts: Spectral and Dynamical Characterization. J Phys Chem Lett. 2016;7:3949– 3953. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b01831. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Bernhard WA. Radical Reaction Pathways Initiated by Direct Energy Deposition in DNA by Ionizing Radiation. Wiley Ser React Intermed Chem Biol. 2009;2:41– 68. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Close D. From the Primary Radiation Induced Radicals in DNA Constituents to Strand Breaks: Low Temperature EPR/ENDOR Studies. In. In: Shukla M, Leszczynski J, editors. Radiation Induced Molecular Phenomena in Nucleic Acids. Vol. 5. Springer; Netherlands: 2008. pp. 493–529. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sagstuen E, Hole EO. In: Radiation produced radicals. Brustolon M, Giamello E, editors. John Wiley & Sons, Inc; New Jersey: 2009. pp. 325–382. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Steenken S. Purine Bases, Nucleosides, and Nucleotides: Aqueous Solution Redox Chemistry and Transformation Reactions of Their Radical Cations and e− and OH Adducts. Chem Rev. 1989;89:503– 520. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Steenken S. Electron-Transfer-Induced Acidity/Basicity and Reactivity Changes of Purine and Pyrimidine Bases. Consequences of Redox Processes for DNA Base Pairs. Free Radical Res Commun. 1992;16:349– 379. doi: 10.3109/10715769209049187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Steenken S. Electron Transfer in DNA? Competition by Ultra-fast Proton Transfer? Biol Chem. 1997;378:1293– 1297. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.O’Neill P, Davies SE. Pulse Radiolytic Study of The Interaction of SO4•− With Deoxynucleosides. Possible Implications for Direct Energy Deposition. Int J Radiat Biol. 1987;52:577– 587. doi: 10.1080/09553008714552071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wagner JR, Cadet J. Oxidation Reactions of Cytosine DNA Components by Hydroxyl Radical and One-electron Oxidants in Aerated Aqueous Solutions. Acc Chem Res. 2010;43:564– 571. doi: 10.1021/ar9002637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Burrows CJ, Muller JG. Oxidative Nucleobase Modifications Leading to Strand Scission. Chem Rev. 1998;98:1109– 1151. doi: 10.1021/cr960421s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wagenknecht H-A. Charge Transfer in DNA. From Mechanism to Application. Wiley-VCH Verlag; 2005. Principles and Mechanisms of Photoinduced Charge Injection, Transport, and Trapping in DNA; pp. 1–26. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Genereux JC, Barton JK. Mechanisms for DNA Charge Transport. Chem Rev. 2010;110:1642– 1662. doi: 10.1021/cr900228f. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Fujitsuka M, Majima T. Hole and Excess Electron Transfer Dynamics in DNA. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2012;14:11234– 11244. doi: 10.1039/c2cp41576c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Anderson RF, Shinde SS, Maroz A. Cytosine-gated Hole Creation and Transfer in DNA in Aqueous Solution. J Am Chem Soc. 2006;128:15966– 15967. doi: 10.1021/ja0658416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Adhikary A, Bothe E, Jain V, von Sonntag C. Pulse radiolysis of the DNA-Binding Ligands Hoechst 33258 and 33342 in Aqueous Solution. Int J Radiat Biol. 2000;76:1157– 1166. doi: 10.1080/09553000050134393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Adhikary A, Khanduri D, Pottiboyina V, Rice CT, Sevilla MD. Formation of Aminyl Radicals on Electron Attachment to AZT: Abstraction from the Sugar Phosphate Backbone vs. One-Electron Oxidation of Guanine. J Phys Chem B. 2010;114:9289– 9299. doi: 10.1021/jp103403p. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Lumpuy DA, Adhikary A, Rice CT, Dang TP, Sobczak A, Sevilla MD, Wnuk SF. Formation of the Aminyl Radical Via One Electron Attachment to 2′-Azido-2′-deoxyuridine and Methyl 2-Azido-2-deoxy-α-D-lyxofuranoside and Subsequent Reaction to Sugar Radical. Abstract Papers ACS. 2012;243:54. -Carb. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Mudgal M, Adhikary A, Hanson CG, Petrovici AO, Sevilla MD, Wnuk SF. Electron-Induced Site Specific Formation and Reactions of the Aminyl Radical in 2′-Azido-2′-deoxycytidine and its 4′-Azidocytidine Analogue. Abstract Papers ACS. 2016;251:450. -Orgn. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Petrovici A, Adhikary A, Kumar A, Sevilla MD. Presolvated Electron Reaction with Methylacetoacetate: Electron Localization, Proton-Deuteron Exchange, and H-atom Abstraction. Molecules. 2014;19:13486– 13497. doi: 10.3390/molecules190913486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Griller D, Mendenhall GD, Van Hoof W, Ingold KU. Kinetic Applications of Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Spectroscopy. XV. Iminyl Radicals. J Am Chem Soc. 1974;96:6068– 6070. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Portela-Cubillo F, Alonso-Ruiz R, Sampedro D, Walton JC. 5-Exo-Cyclizations of Pentenyliminyl Radicals: Inversion of the gem-Dimethyl Effect. J Phys Chem A. 2009;113:10005– 10012. doi: 10.1021/jp9047902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Hwu JR, Lin CC, Chuang SH, King KY, Su TR, Tsay SC. Aminyl and Iminyl Radicals From Arylhydrazones in The Photo-induced DNA Cleavage. Bioorg Med Chem. 2004;12:2509– 2515. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2004.03.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kuttappan-Nair V, Samson-Thibault F, Wagner JR. Generation of 2′-Deoxyadenosine N6-Aminyl Radicals from the Photolysis of Phenylhydrazone Derivatives. Chem Res Toxicol. 2010;23:48– 54. doi: 10.1021/tx900268r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Zheng L, Griesser M, Pratt DA, Greenberg MM. Aminyl Radical Generation via Tandem Norrish Type I Photocleavage, β-Fragmentation: Independent Generation and Reactivity of the 2′-Deoxyadenosin-N6-yl Radical. J Org Chem. 2017;82:3571– 3580. doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.7b00093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Newcomb M. Radical Kinetics and Clocks. In: Chatgilialoglu C, Struder A, editors. Encyclopedia of Radicals in Chemistry, Biology and Materials. John Wiley & Sons Ltd; Chichester, UK: 2012. pp. 107–124. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Fleet GWJ, Smith PW. The synthesis From d-Xylose of The Potent and Specific Enantiomeric Glucosidase Inhibitors, 1,4-Dideoxy-1,4-imino-d-arabinitol and 1,4-Dideoxy-1,4-imin. Tetrahedron. 1986;42:5685– 5692. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Baker BR, Schaub RE, Williams JH. Puromycin. Synthetic Studies. VIII. Synthesis of 3-Amino-3-deoxy-d-ribofuranoside Derivatives. A Second Synthesis of 3-Amino-3-deoxy-d-ribose. J Am Chem Soc. 1955;77:7– 12. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Robins MJ, Hawrelak SD, Hernández AE, Wnuk SF. Nucleic Acid Related Compounds. LXXXI. Efficient General Synthesis of Purine (Amino, Azido, and Triflate)-Sugar Nucleosides. Nucleosides and Nucleotides. 1992;11:821– 834. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Hobbs JB, Eckstein F. A General Method for the Synthesis of 2′-Azido-2′-Deoxy- and 2′-Amino-2′-Deoxyribofuranosyl Purines. J Org Chem. 1977;42:714– 719. doi: 10.1021/jo00424a031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Désiré J, Prandi J. Synthesis of Methyl β-D-Arabinofuranoside 5-[1-D (and L)-myo-inositol 1-phosphate], the Capping Motif of the Lipoarabinomannan of Mycobacteriumsmegmatis. Carbohydr Res. 1999;317:110– 118. doi: 10.1016/s0008-6215(99)00078-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Gotfredsen CH, Jacobsen JP, Wengel J. Synthesis and Properties of α- and β-Oligodeoxynucleotides Containing α- and β-1-(2-O-methyl-D-arabinofuranosyl) Thymine. Bioorg Med Chem. 1996;4:1217– 1225. doi: 10.1016/0968-0896(96)00117-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Adhikary A, Malkhasian AYS, Collins S, Koppen J, Becker D, Sevilla MD. UVA-visible Photo-excitation of Guanine Radical Cations Produces Sugar Radicals in DNA and Model Structures. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33:5553– 5564. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Adhikary A, Collins S, Khanduri D, Sevilla MD. Sugar Radicals Formed by Photo-Excitation of Guanine Cation Radical in Oligonucleotides. J Phys Chem B. 2007;111:7415– 7421. doi: 10.1021/jp071107c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Adhikary A, Becker D, Collins S, Koppen J, Sevilla MD. C5′- and C3′-Sugar Radicals Produced via Photo-excitation of One-Electron Oxidized Adenine in 2′-Deoxyadenosine and Its Derivatives. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34:1501– 1511. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkl026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Khanduri D, Collins S, Kumar A, Adhikary A, Sevilla MD. Formation of Sugar Radicals in RNA Model Systems and Oligomers Via Excitation of Guanine Cation Radical. J Phys Chem B. 2008;112:2168– 2178. doi: 10.1021/jp077429y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Adhikary A, Becker D, Palmer BJ, Heizer AN, Sevilla MD. Direct Formation of The C5′-Radical in The Sugar-Phosphate Backbone of DNA by High Energy Radiation. J Phys Chem B. 2012;116:5900– 5906. doi: 10.1021/jp3023919. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Adhikary A, Kumar A, Heizer AN, Palmer BJ, Pottiboyina V, Liang Y, Wnuk SF, Sevilla MD. Hydroxyl Ion Addition to One-Electron Oxidized Thymine: Unimolecular Interconversion of C5 to C6 OH-Adducts. J Am Chem Soc. 2013;135:3121– 3135. doi: 10.1021/ja310650n. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Doboszewski B, de Toni Uchôa F, Nazarenko AY, Nemykin VN. Crystal Structure of 1-Deoxy-1-(3-hydroxypropyl)-O-Triphenylmethyl-β-d-Lyxofuranose, C27H30O5. Z Kristallogr NCS. 2011;226:61– 62. [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Doboszewski B. Easy Synthesis of 1-Allyl-1-Deoxy-β- and α-d-Lyxofuranoses. J Carbohydr Chem. 2002;21:79– 88. [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Sevilla MD, Morehouse KM, Swarts S. An ESR Study of Electron Reactions with Esters and Triglycerides. J Phys Chem. 1981;85:923– 927. [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Sevilla MD, Sevilla CL, Swarts S. Hydrogen Abstraction Reactions by Amide Electron Adducts: A Comparison to Acid Ester, Aldehyde and Ketone Electron Adducts. Radiat Phys Chem. 1982;20:141– 147. [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Bloomfield VA, Crothers DM, Tinoco I., Jr . Physical Chemistry of Nucleic Acids. Harper & Row; New York: 1974. [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Sullivan PJ, Sr, Koski WS. An Electron Spin Resonance Study of the Relative Stabilities of Free Radicals Trapped in Irradiated Methanol at 77°K. J Am Chem Soc. 1963;85:384– 387. [Google Scholar]
  • 58.SPARTAN, version 14. Wavefunction, Inc; Irvine, CA: 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Frisch MJ, Trucks GW, Schlegel HB, Scuseria GE, Robb MA, Cheeseman JR, Scalmani G, Barone V, Mennucci B, Petersson GA, et al. Gaussian 09. Gaussian, Inc; Wallingford, CT: 2009. [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Dizdaroglu M, Neuwald K, von Sonntag C. Radiation Chemistry of DNA Model Compounds, IX* Carbohydrate Products in the y-Radiolysis of Thymidine in Aqueous Solution. The Radical-Induced Scission of the N-Glycosidic Bond. Z Naturforsch. 1976;31B:227– 233. [Google Scholar]
  • 61.In addition, formation of 5-deoxy-xylo-hexodialdose was observed in γ-irradiated N2O-saturated solution of glucose (see ref. 62). Our work (scheme 7) along with 2,4-dideoxypentodialdose formation in N2O-saturated and γ-irradiated aqueous solution of thymidine (scheme 9) would propose the following mechanism. Firstly, the H-atom abstraction from C-6 of glucose by radiation-produced •OH leads to C6• production; subsequently, C6• is converted facilely and unimolecularly to the ring-opened C5• which would lead to 5-deoxy-xylo-hexodialdose formation via similar pathways shown in schemes 7 and 9.
  • 62.Dizdaroglu M, Henneberg D, Schomburg G, von Sonntag C. Radiation Chemistry of Carbohydrates, VI*. γ-Radiolysis of Glucose in Deoxygenated N2O Saturated Aqueous Solution. Z Naturforsch. 1975;30B:416– 425. [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Shukla LI, Adhikary A, Pazdro R, Becker D, Sevilla MD. Formation of 8-Oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine-radicals in γ-Irradiated DNA by Multiple One-Electron Oxidations. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:6565– 6574. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supporting Information

RESOURCES