Skip to main content
International Journal of Stem Cells logoLink to International Journal of Stem Cells
. 2017 May;10(1):69–75. doi: 10.15283/ijsc16048

Bone Marrow Stem Cells Anti-liver Fibrosis Potency: Inhibition of Hepatic Stellate Cells Activity and Extracellular Matrix Deposition

Ervina Julien Sitanggang 1,*, Radiana Dhewayani Antarianto 2,*,, Sri Widia A Jusman 3, Jeanne Adiwinata Pawitan 2, Ahmad Aulia Jusuf 2
PMCID: PMC5488778  PMID: 28531915

Abstract

Transplantation of bone marrow derived stem cells (BMSCs) has been reported inhibits liver fibrosis. Several in vitro studies by co-culturing BMSCs and hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) indirectly or directly in 2D models showed inhibition of HSC as the key player in liver fibrosis. In this study, we investigated direct effect of BMSCs on HSCs by co-culturing BMSCs and HSCs in 3D model as it represents the liver microenvironment with intricate cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions. Primary isolated rat HSCs and BMSCs were directly co-cultured at 1:1 ratio with hanging drop method. The monoculture of rat HSCs served as positive control. Mono-culture and co-culture samples were harvested on day 3, 5 and 7 for histological analysis. The samples were analyzed for extracellular matrix deposition by Masson’s Trichrome staining, tenascin-C immunocytochemistry, resting HSC’s state as shown by positive Oil Red O stained cells. Our results indicated CD90+CD34 BMSCs anti-liver fibrosis potency as evidenced by higher proportion of Oil Red O-positive cells in the co-culture group compared to the monoculture group and the significant decrease in extracellular matrix deposition as well as the decrease in tenascin-C expression in the co-culture group (p<0.05) compared to the monoculture group. These findings demonstrate that BMSCs have a potential therapeutic effect against liver fibrotic process through their capacity to inhibit HSCs activation and their effect in minimizing extracellular matrix deposition.

Keywords: Hepatic stellate cells, Bone marrow derived stem cells, Tenascin-C, Liver fibrosis, 3D co-culture

Introduction

Liver cirrhosis is a severe form of liver fibrosis. Histological feature shows formation of regenerative nodules surrounded by fibrotic scar tissue. Chronic liver injury causes progression of liver fibrosis to liver cirrhosis. End stage liver disease is the bleak endpoint of uncompensated liver cirrhosis (1). Global Health Observatory of the World Health Organization in 2012 reported mortality rate caused by cirrhosis is 14,9 and 16 per 100.000 men in United States and UK, respectively. Mortality rate caused by cirrhosis in Indonesia is 52,7 per 100.000 men. This number is higher than US and UK (2).

Standard therapy for liver cirrhosis is liver transplantation. However, limited living liver donor and high cost remains a bottleneck problem for transplantation. A large number of patients died in the waiting list for liver donation (3). Experimental research for example injection of bone marrow derived stem cells (BMSCs) in liver cirrhosis patients indicates potential therapeutic option (46). Another experimental approach used hepatic stellate cells as target for anti-fibrotic therapy. Strategy for this approach utilizes chemicals to de-activate hepatic stellate cells or neutralizes fibrogenicity and proliferative capacity of hepatic stellate cells.

Hepatic stellate cell induces liver fibrosis. Activation of hepatic stellate cell into myofibroblast signifies the occurrence of fibrosis in liver tissue. Activated hepatic stellate cells displayed phenotypic and morphologic changes e.g. in proliferation capacity (7), chemotaxis, fibrogenicity, contractility and absence of retinoid vacuoles. These changes result in increased deposition of extracellular matrix proteins e.g. collagen, accelerated matrix turnover and scar tissue formation. Progressive liver fibrosis hampers normal hepatocyte functions thus resulting in a progressive liver failure (8, 9).

In vitro studies showed BMSCs effect on hepatic stellate cell’s activity via paracrine factors (indirect co-culture using transwell) or direct co-culture 2D for juxtacrine effect (10, 11). Tenascin-C is one of the extracellular matrix protein that increases during liver fibrosis (1214). Activated hepatic stellate cells are recognized as the cellular source of Tenascin-C (15, 16).

The objective of this study is to investigate the direct effect of BMSCs on HSCs by co-culturing BMSCs and HSCs in 3D co-culture model. 3D co-culture method could provide optimal visualization of intricate cell to cell, or cell to matrix interaction between BMSCs and HSCs.

Materials and Methods

Design of this study is in vitro experimental study using two cell populations : BMSCs from primary culture of Sprague Dawley (SD) rat bone marrow aspirate and HSCs from primary culture of SD liver parenchymal cells. The experiment was replicated 3 times. This study was performed from January to August 2015 at Institute of Human Virology and Cancer Biology (IHVCB) Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia – Cipto Mangunkusumo Central Hospital (FKUI-RSCM), Histology Lab FKUI and Stem Cell Lab National Institute of Health Research and Development Ministry of Health Republic of Indonesia. Protocol of this study has been approved by Ethical Committee Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia.

Isolation and characterization of HSCs

Isolation of HSCs was done according a to a modification of Riccalton-Banks method (17). In brief, rat liver was dissected into small pieces, incubated in collagenase I for 30 minutes in 37°C. The digested tissue was filtered using sterile steel filtration. The flow through cell suspension was centrifuged at 1200 rpm for 10 minutes and supernatant was collected. Supernatant was centrifuged at 1200 rpm for 10 minutes and pellet was collected. The pellet was resuspended with 6 mL medium (DMEM+FBS 10%+Penicillin/Streptomycin 1%+Fungizone 1%). HSCs were characterized by morphology and culture well adhesiveness in addition by Oil Red O staining.

Isolation and characterization of BMSCs

Isolation of BMSCs was done according to a modification of Zhao method (18). In brief; femur and tibial bone were obtained. Top and bottom part of each bone was excised and discarded. 27G syringe was used to flush the bone marrow aspirate with PBS solution onto 10 cm petri dish. Bone marrow aspirate was collected and transferred to 15 ml falcon tube. Further it was subjected to centrifugation at 1200 rpm for 10 minutes. Pellet was collected and resuspended in 6 mL medium (DMEM+FBS 10%+Penicillin/Streptomycin 1%+Fungizone 1%). BMSCs phenotype was checked by flowcytometry analysis of CD90 and CD34.

3D co-culture of HSCs and BMSCs with Hanging Drop method

This culture method used a 10 cm petri dish. 30 μL mixture comprising of both cells suspension in ratio 1:1 (v/v) was carefully pipetted on to inner side of upper petri dish lid (open position). Each lid in the end contained of average 20 drops. The lower petri dish was filled with 5 mL of DMEM+FBS 10%+Penicillin/Streptomycin 1%+ Fungizone. With a single gesture, the upper lid was flipped to obtain closed petri dish position. The drops were hanging on the inner side of the upper lid. The dish was incubated in CO2 incubator at 37°C, CO2 5%, humidity 95%. There were four dishes. Three dishes according to day of harvest: day 3, day 5 and day 7. One dish was as negative control that contained harvested monoculture 3D hanging drop of HSCs at day 7.

Oil Red O staining

Inactive HSCs was determined by positive oil red O staining. Harvested hanging drops were collected day 3, day 5 or day 7 as well as negative control on day 7. Sample obtained was incubated with Oil Red O working solution (Histology FKUI, Indonesia) in eppendorf tube for 30 minutes. Stained sample was pipetted onto histology slide and observed under light microscope. Five high power fields were randomly selected from each sample. Oil red O positive cells were counted in each high power field. Mean of harvested sample on day 3, 5 or 7 were analyzed.

Masson’s trichrome staining

Extracellular matrix deposition in the hanging drops was evaluated by Masson’s Trichrome staining. Harvested hanging drops sample was collected day 3, day 5 or day 7 as well as negative control on day 7. Sample was pipetted onto histology slide. Masson’s Trichrome staining (Histology FKUI, Indonesia) was performed and slide was observed under the light microscope. Five high power field was randomly selected from each sample.

3D co-culture hanging drop is an artificial structure. Prior report on Masson Trichrome staining of this structure is absent. Positive control of Masson Trichrome staining for collagen fibre in subcutaneous tissue showed histological feature of blue fibrous (wavy) streak appearance. This is not observed in the Masson Trichrome stained hanging drops. Thus we did visualization analysis of non-collagen type I ECM: lighter stained area indicated least abundant extracellular matrix deposition in comparison with darker stained area with Masson Trichrome’s staining. We evaluated proportion of lighter stained area to whole drops area stained with Masson Trichrome (lighter and darker stained area). Lighter stained area in each high power field was measured using Optilab imaging software. Mean of harvested sample on day 3, 5 or 7 were analyzed.

Immunochemistry tenascin-C

Harvested co-culture hanging drops were collected on day 7 and negative control on day 7. Sample obtained was pipetted onto histology slide. Blocking endogenous peroxidase was done with H2O2 3%. Nonspecific binding reduction with donkey serum 1.5% blocking was done for 1 hour. Incubation with primary antibody anti-tenascin-C sc9871 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, US) was done for 1 hour in moist chamber at room temperature. Incubation with biotinylated secondary antibody was done, followed by streptavidin-conjugated-peroxidase and DAB substrate addition. Nuclear counterstained with Hematoxylin Harris. Slide was observed under light microscope. Five high power fields were randomly selected from each sample. Areas of dark brown signals (positive tenascin-C) were measured in each high power field. Mean of dark brown signals in harvested sample on day 7 were analyzed.

Data analysis

Data analysis was performed using SPSS program. Number of inactivated HSCs, area of extracellular matrix deposition and tenascin C positive were analysed for normal distribution with Saphiro-Wilk test, followed by homogeneity Levene test. Comparison between groups was analyzed using independent t-test for parametric test or Mann-Whitney for non-parametric test. Statistical significance was considered at α=0.05.

Results

Phenotype analysis of BMSCs

Flow cytometry analysis of BMSCs showed percentage of CD90+CD34 was 35.2%. Isotype control was shown in Fig. 1A. This percentage was acquired from gated population in left upper quadrant (Fig. 1B). Description of other cell population was displayed in Fig. 1C.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Phenotype of BMSCs. (A) Isotype Control APC-PE. (B) BMSCs stained with APC-labeled anti-CD90 and PE-labeled anti-CD34 antibody. (C) A table describing percentage of cell population in each quadrant in FACS blot.

3D co-culture BMSCs and HSCs effect on the proportion of inactive HSCs

Staining results showed large extracellular oil red O droplets, which made it difficult to count the number of active and inactive HSCs. Therefore analysis was only done qualitatively. Qualitative observation indicated higher proportion of inactive HSCs in 3D co-culture compared to monoculture groups on day-3, day-5 and day-7 (Supplementary Fig. 1).

3D BMSCs and HSCs co-culture effect on extracellular matrix deposition

Mean proportion of lighter stained area in 3D co-culture day 3, day 5 or day 7 was lower than negative control (3D HSCs monoculture) (Fig. 2A, B). There was no statistical significant difference between 3D co-culture day 3 (p=0.116) or day 5 (p=0.781) with negative control. Comparison between 3D co-culture day 7 showed statistically significant difference with negative control (3D monoculture HSCs) (p=0.01) (Fig. 2C).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Comparison of extracellular matrix deposition with Masson Trichrome staining (400× magnification). (A) Microphotograph Masson’s Trichrome stained hanging drop mono-culture day 7 (400× magnification). (B) Microphotograph Masson’s Trichrome stained hanging drop co-culture day 7 (400× magnification). (C) Mean proportion of lighter stained area which indicate least abundant extracellular matrix deposition. *Indicate significant difference between mean proportion of mono-culture 3D with co-culture 3D.

3D BMSCs and HSCs co-culture effect on Tenascin-C expression

Positive Tenascin-C expression was shown as dark brown signals in the extracellular area. Proportion of positive tenascin-C area was evaluated by dividing area measurement of positive tenascin-C expression with whole hanging drop area in histology slide (Fig. 3A, B, C). Mean proportion of positive Tenascin-C area between 3D co-culture day 7 was statistically significant lower than 3D mono-culture (p=0.004) (Fig. 3D).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Comparison between Positive Tenasicn C area. (A) Microphotograph immunochemitry Tenascin-C negative control 3D mono-culture day 7, 400× magnification. (B) Microphotograph immunochemitry Tenascin-C 3D mono-culture day 7, 400× magnification. (C) Microphotograph immunochemistry tenascin-C 3D co-culture day 7, 400× magnification. (D) Mean of proportion of positive Tenascin-C area. *Indicate statistical significant difference.

Discussion

In vitro study to evaluate HSC activity can be intriguing. Culture well attachment has been reported to influence HSCs activity. Inactive phenotype was maintained either in suspension culture or non-adherent culture (21). Our hanging drop culture system provide qualitative technique to distinguish active and inactive HSCs with Oil red O staining. Our result suggested higher proportion of inactive HSCs in 3D co-culture BMSCs and HSCs compare to monoculture HSCs. Previous study using direct 2D co-culture HSCs and BM MSCs showed lower expression of activated HSCs (11). Increased HSCs apoptosis and decreased proliferation may cause lower proportion of activated HSCs (10, 11, 22).

Our result showed least abundant extracellular matrix deposition in 3D BMSCs and HSCs co-culture in comparison with 3D HSCs mono-culture. Decrease extracellular matrix deposition by 3D hanging drop co-culture BMDCs with HSCs provide evidence of liver anti-fibrotic effect. Parekkadan et al. showed pro-collagen type I peptide concentration was lower in HSCs co-culture with BM MSCs. BM MSCs inhibit collagen synthesis in activated HSCs by paracrine effect. BM MSCs secretes IL-10 and TNF-α (15).

Increased tenascin-C expression -as one of the extracellular matrix protein secreted by activated HSCs- is associated with liver injury and fibrosis or cirrhosis (1216, 2325). Our result showed proportion of positive Tenascin-C area in 3D BMSCs and HSCs co-culture was lower than 3D HSC monoculture. Lower tenascin-C expression corresponds with higher resting HSCs or inactive HSCs. Prior studies by El Karef (12) and Jiang (16) showed activated HSC secretes higher amount of tenascin-C in comparison to resting HSCs. Tenascin-C plays a major role in increasing pro-collagen type I and III gene expression through several mechanism: robust inflammatory response by increased cytokine secretion, increased cell recruitment and increased TGF-β(26).

Liver fibrosis study requires improved in vitro method from 2D co-culture to 3D co-culture for optimal micro-environment analysis. Our study uses 3D co-culture hanging drop method which formed cellular aggregates between two populations of cells. 3D culture system enable optimal cell to cell or cell to matrix interaction thus mimic the in vivo microenvironment (19, 20).

Limitation of this study was the low percentage of our isolated BMDCs phenotype compared to standard BM MSCs: 35.2% CD90+CD34 vs over 80%. Our study may initiate concomitant study to further refine isolation method with cell sorting technique. Another limitation of this study is difficulty in counting oil red O positive and negative cells. This fact arose due to the staining technique, which omit washing of stained cells hence the presence of extracellular oil red O droplets appeared.

Inhibition of HSC activity by direct interaction with BMDCs reduces fibrogenesis thus offer potential liver anti-fibrotic therapy. Further investigation is needed to elucidate the fibrogenic signaling pathways of liver micro-environment.

Conclusion

BMDCs with HSCs 3D co-culture provides in vitro evidence for least abundant extracellular matrix deposition, lower tenascin-C expression and suggested higher proportion of inactivated HSCs. BMDCs directly effect HSCs activation by reducing ECM deposition and tenascin-C secretion hence have liver anti-fibrotic potency.

Supplementary Information

ijsc-10-069_suppl.pdf (55.1KB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

This study is funded by PUPT Dikti 2015 research grant (Hibah Penelitian Unggulan Perguruan Tinggi Universitas Indonesia). The authors acknowledge the work of Wahyunia LS in performing the culture and histology analysis and Ariyani N for performing the flow cytometry analysis.

Footnotes

Potential conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicting financial interest.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary data including one figure can be found with this article online at http://pdf.medrang.co.kr/paper/pdf/IJSC/IJSC-10-s16048.pdf.

References

  • 1.Schuppan D, Afdhal NH. Liver cirrhosis. Lancet. 2008;371:838–851. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60383-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Age-standardized death rates liver cirrhosis (15+ years) per 100,000 population 2012 [Internet] [cited 2014 Oct14]. Available from: http://gamapserver.who.int/gho/interactive_charts/gisah/death_rates_cirrhosis/atlas.html.
  • 3.Kim WR, Kremers WK. Benefits of “the benefit model” in liver transplantation. Hepatology. 2008;48:697–698. doi: 10.1002/hep.22497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Mohamadnejad M, Alimoghaddam K, Mohyeddin-Bonab M, Bagheri M, Bashtar M, Ghanaati H, Baharvand H, Ghavamzadeh A, Malekzadeh R. Phase 1 trial of autologous bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell transplantation in patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis. Arch Iran Med. 2007;10:459–466. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ismail A, Fouad O, Abdelnasser A, Chowdhury A, Selim A. Stem cell therapy improves the outcome of liver resection in cirrhotics. J Gastrointest Cancer. 2010;41:17–23. doi: 10.1007/s12029-009-9092-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Levicar N, Pai M, Habib NA, Tait P, Jiao LR, Marley SB, Davis J, Dazzi F, Smadja C, Jensen SL, Nicholls JP, Apperley JF, Gordon MY. Long-term clinical results of autologous infusion of mobilized adult bone marrow derived CD34+ cells in patients with chronic liver disease. Cell Prolif. 2008;41(Suppl 1):115–125. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2184.2008.00491.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kinnman N, Goria O, Wendum D, Gendron MC, Rey C, Poupon R, Housset C. Hepatic stellate cell proliferation is an early platelet-derived growth factor-mediated cellular event in rat cholestatic liver injury. Lab Invest. 2001;81:1709–1716. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.3780384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Elpek GÖ. Cellular and molecular mechanisms in the pathogenesis of liver fibrosis: An update. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:7260–7276. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i23.7260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Friedman SL. Hepatic fibrosis -- overview. Toxicology. 2008;254:120–129. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2008.06.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Parekkadan B, van Poll D, Megeed Z, Kobayashi N, Tilles AW, Berthiaume F, Yarmush ML. Immunomodulation of activated hepatic stellate cells by mesenchymal stem cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2007;363:247–252. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.05.150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Chen S, Xu L, Lin N, Pan W, Hu K, Xu R. Activation of Notch1 signaling by marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells through cell-cell contact inhibits proliferation of hepatic stellate cells. Life Sci. 2011;89:975–981. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2011.10.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Van Eyken P, Sciot R, Desmet VJ. Expression of the novel extracellular matrix component tenascin in normal and diseased human liver. An immunohistochemical study. J Hepatol. 1990;11:43–52. doi: 10.1016/0168-8278(90)90270-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Richter HB, Franke H, Dargel R. Expression of tenascin, fibronectin, and laminin in rat liver fibrogenesis--a comparative immunohistochemical study with two models of liver injury. Exp Toxicol Pathol. 1998;50:315–322. doi: 10.1016/S0940-2993(98)80011-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Tanaka H, El-Karef A, Kaito M, Kinoshita N, Fujita N, Horiike S, Watanabe S, Yoshida T, Adachi Y. Circulating level of large splice variants of tenascin-C is a marker of piecemeal necrosis activity in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Liver Int. 2006;26:311–318. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2005.01229.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Mekonnen GA, Ijzer J, Nederbragt H. Tenascin-C in chronic canine hepatitis: immunohistochemical localization and correlation with necro-inflammatory activity, fibrotic stage, and expression of alpha-smooth muscle actin, cytokeratin 7, and CD3+ cells. Vet Pathol. 2007;44:803–813. doi: 10.1354/vp.44-6-803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.El-Karef A, Kaito M, Tanaka H, Ikeda K, Nishioka T, Fujita N, Inada H, Adachi Y, Kawada N, Nakajima Y, Imanaka-Yoshida K, Yoshida T. Expression of large tenascin-C splice variants by hepatic stellate cells/myofibroblasts in chronic hepatitis C. J Hepatol. 2007;46:664–673. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2006.10.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Riccalton-Banks L, Bhandari R, Fry J, Shakesheff KM. A simple method for the simultaneous isolation of stellate cells and hepatocytes from rat liver tissue. Mol Cell Biochem. 2003;248:97–102. doi: 10.1023/A:1024184826728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Zhao DC, Lei JX, Chen R, Yu WH, Zhang XM, Li SN, Xiang P. Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells protect against experimental liver fibrosis in rats. World J Gastroenterol. 2005;11:3431–3440. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i22.3431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Higgins CA, Richardson GD, Ferdinando D, Westgate GE, Jahoda CA. Modelling the hair follicle dermal papilla using spheroid cell cultures. Exp Dermatol. 2010;19:546–548. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0625.2009.01007.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Breslin S, O’Driscoll L. Three-dimensional cell culture: the missing link in drug discovery. Drug Discov Today. 2013;18:240–249. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2012.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Friedman SL. Hepatic stellate cells: protean, multifunctional, and enigmatic cells of the liver. Physiol Rev. 2008;88:125–172. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00013.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Qin S, Jiang H, Su S, Wang D, Liang Z, Zhang J, Yang W. Inhibition of hepatic stellate cell proliferation by bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells via regulation of the cell cycle in rat. Exp Ther Med. 2012;4:375–380. doi: 10.3892/etm.2012.628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Pas J, Wyszko E, Rolle K, Rychlewski L, Nowak S, Zukiel R, Barciszewski J. Analysis of structure and function of tenascin-C. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2006;38:1594–1602. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2006.03.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Jones FS, Jones PL. The tenascin family of ECM glycoproteins: structure, function, and regulation during embryonic development and tissue remodeling. Dev Dyn. 2000;218:235–259. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0177(200006)218:2&#x0003c;235::AID-DVDY2&#x0003e;3.0.CO;2-G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Jones PL, Jones FS. Tenascin-C in development and disease: gene regulation and cell function. Matrix Biol. 2000;19:581–596. doi: 10.1016/S0945-053X(00)00106-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.El-Karef A, Yoshida T, Gabazza EC, Nishioka T, Inada H, Sakakura T, Imanaka-Yoshida K. Deficiency of tenascin-C attenuates liver fibrosis in immune-mediated chronic hepatitis in mice. J Pathol. 2007;211:86–94. doi: 10.1002/path.2099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

ijsc-10-069_suppl.pdf (55.1KB, pdf)

Articles from International Journal of Stem Cells are provided here courtesy of Korean Society for Stem Cell Research

RESOURCES