Abstract
Objectives
This study aimed to develop and validate a health education programme to encourage breast cancer awareness and early detection behaviours among Arab women.
Methods
This study took place between December 2015 and March 2016. The Enabling Systems Raising Awareness model was used to develop a breast cancer health education programme which was subsequently implemented by trained health educators at three female-only fitness clubs in Muscat, Oman. Breast cancer knowledge among 53 women was assessed using the breast module of the Cancer Awareness Measure before and after each health education session. Overall pre- and post-session knowledge scores were then compared. Additionally, three focus group discussions were conducted with 10 participants from each location. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the transcribed discussions and collect feedback on the programme.
Results
The health education sessions resulted in a statistically significant increase in overall mean knowledge scores (P <0.001). Participants also reported significantly improved intentions to undertake early detection practices (P <0.001). The focus group discussions yielded distinct themes and valuable feedback which can be utilised in the future to create an improved version of the programme.
Conclusion
While the health education programme significantly improved breast cancer and early detection knowledge among a cohort of Arab women, it still required critical improvements in terms of structure and administration. Additional studies are required in order to evaluate long-term behavioural outcomes resulting from the improved programme.
Keywords: Breast Cancer, Preventive Health Services, Health Behavior, Health Education, Health Promotion, Validation Studies, Oman
Advances in Knowledge
- This study developed and validated a breast cancer health education programme for use among Arab women.
- The health education programme significantly improved overall knowledge of breast cancer risk factors, symptoms and early detection methods among a cohort of Omani women.
- The findings of this study resulted in valuable qualitative feedback to be used in the development of an improved version of the programme; this improved version could then potentially be implemented nationwide in Oman.
Application to Patient Care
- Enhanced awareness of breast health among Omani women may help to improve early detection of breast cancer and the use of early detection services such as mammography.
Breast cancer is the most common cause of cancer-related deaths among women worldwide.1 In addition, the burden of breast cancer is higher in less developed countries, constituting 58–65% of all breast cancer-related deaths.1,2 In Oman, women are diagnosed with breast cancer at a younger age and at a more advanced stage compared to developed countries.3,4 Nevertheless, breast cancer awareness remains low in Arab societies, mostly due to fear, modesty, lack of health education, limited access to breast health services and common misconceptions.3,5 In terms of awareness, Omani women show similar characteristics in comparison to those from other Arab countries, such as Qatar, Saudi Arabia and Jordan.6–10 A previous qualitative study has highlighted various factors that influence breast cancer awareness among Omani women and the desire among this population for enhanced breast cancer information systems and programmes.6
Various studies have recognised the need for breast cancer health education programmes.11–15 However, it is necessary to address barriers to breast cancer awareness and early detection in the context of the local population’s presiding social and cultural beliefs.9,10,16,17 Health education interventions therefore need to be culturally and linguistically tailored, while still portraying breast cancer as a treatable disease.14,18–20 Learning strategies, activities and tools should also be aligned with the local cultural context.21,22 In Bangladesh, China, Saudi Arabia, Egypt and Iran, health education campaigns have resulted in a significant positive impact on breast cancer awareness levels and early detection practices, with improved awareness, positive health beliefs and increased early detection activities and suitable follow-up practices after abnormal examination results.12,23–26
The Enabling Systems Raising Awareness (ESRA) model is based on the following four premises: (1) that individuals can actively regulate their own behaviours; (2) that they interact with the environment on multiple biopsychosocial levels, eventually shaping and being shaped by the environment over time; (3) that health practitioners greatly affect individuals by exerting influence on them; and (4) that self-initiated reconstruction or empowerment of person-environment interactive patterns is essential to change behaviours.6,27 Additionally, the ESRA model emphasises specific systems which either enable or inhibit Arab women in terms of health awareness. According to modifiability, these include personal (e.g. cultural, religious or fatalistic beliefs), interpersonal (e.g. familial or environmental factors) and healthcare-related systems [Table 1].6 Furthermore, the model highlights the complete influence of external enabling systems on each other, known as the “pouring-in” process, while the influence of Omani women across systems to initiate interventions to increase awareness is an “out-pouring” process (i.e. an empowering internal enabling system). As such, each Arab woman is considered an instrument or enabler for other women in the advocacy for breast cancer awareness [Figure 1].6 This framework therefore suggests a sustainable method of improving breast cancer awareness in Arab countries, in that public health programmes can use existing enabling systems to improve awareness levels among groups of women, after which empowered women can then spread their knowledge to other women, resulting in a multiplier effect.
Table 1.
Systems, concepts and relevant content objectives of the Enabling Systems of Raising Awareness breast cancer model6
| System | Concepts | Content objectives |
|---|---|---|
| Cultural/religious/fatalistic |
|
|
| Personal/familial/environmental |
|
|
| Healthcare-related |
|
|
Figure 1.
Diagram of the Enabling Systems of Raising Awareness (ESRA) breast cancer model. Note the increasing modifiability of the factors moving closer towards the centre of the model.
Reproduced with permission from Alkhasawneh E, Siddiqui ST, Leocadio M, Seshan V, Al-Farsi Y, Al-Moundhri MS. I do not even say “it”: A mixed methods study on breast cancer awareness of Omani women.6
This study aimed to develop and validate a breast cancer health education programme for Arab women based on the ESRA model.6 An asset-mapping exercise prior to development of the programme did not identify any existing formal or standardised breast health programmes that had been previously implemented in Oman. It is hoped that the findings of this study will enable public health practitioners, health professionals and policy-makers in Oman to better understand the role of health education in breast cancer awareness and early detection. In addition, the results of this study may guide similar health education models for future breast cancer-related programmes in Arab populations.
Methods
This study took place between December 2015 and March 2016. Based on the previously described ESRA model, a breast cancer health education programme was developed in both Arabic and English.6 Primary and secondary research was conducted on breast cancer education programmes and barriers to breast cancer awareness and early detection among Omani women. Three academics from Sultan Qaboos University (SQU), Muscat, Oman, and the University of Jordan (UJ), Amman, Jordan, who were familiar with breast cancer awareness programmes were consulted. Focus group discussions were held with Omani women recruited from three female-only fitness clubs regarding local factors that influence breast cancer awareness and early detection levels. In addition, four health professionals were interviewed regarding breast cancer screening and diagnosis services at local health facilities. All content, materials, learning strategies and evaluation techniques utilised in the programme were designed in consultation with these experts. A literature review was undertaken of previously published evidence-based breast cancer health education programmes and recent studies assessing breast cancer awareness levels among Arab women.3,4,6,28,29
The development of the programme was an iterative process, leading to multiple versions of the programme until the final version was ready for implementation. The content was reviewed to improve its linguistic and cultural sensitivity as well as the visual design, content, flow of ideas and structure of the programme. In particular, the health education programme was designed to desensitise the notion of examining/touching breasts by emphasising that breasts are an important part of the body and should be treated with the same respect as other body parts. As all breasts are different, it was necessary to stress the importance of “knowing your own breasts” so that each woman would be able to recognise any potential abnormalities, for instance by noting changes in the appearance or texture of their breasts. The health education programme was also designed to be as interactive as possible. Each section started with a few open-ended questions to initiate discussion, followed by information to be shared by the health educator. An effective learning activity called the ‘myth and fact game’ was developed, which aimed to dispel common local misconceptions such as “breast cancer cannot be treated”, “breast cancer is always painful”, “a small lump in your breast can be ignored” and “the evil eye is a risk factor for breast cancer”.6
The content of the programme was designed to be understandable to a layperson with no prior medical knowledge and included breast cancer statistics (e.g. incidence rates) and knowledge regarding the definition of the disease, specific diseases stage, risk factors, signs/symptoms, early detection practices and treatments [Table 2]. Each section of the programme used specific learning strategies that suited the topic being discussed. Some sections were explained using pictographs, as facts presented with pictures are not only easily understandable but also better retained.30 Cultural, religious or fatalistic beliefs and interpersonal or familial factors affecting breast health were addressed during an open discussion, as these topics required more in-depth interaction with the participants. Images and a breast model were used to demonstrate the appearance and texture of breast changes. In line with the ESRA model, the health education programme ended with the participants taking part in a vocal and signed pledge to prioritise their breast health and promote breast cancer awareness at the personal, familial and community levels.6 The entire programme was designed to be delivered via a printed handout with an accompanying multimedia PowerPoint presentation, Version 2010 (Microsoft Corp., Redmond, Washington, USA).
Table 2.
Outline of a breast cancer health education programme for Arab women based on the Enabling Systems of Raising Awareness breast cancer model6
| Learning objective | Content | Learning strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Clarify the incidence of breast cancer and associated risk factors among Omani women |
|
|
| Correct personal beliefs or local misconceptions related to breast cancer and discuss fatalism and breast cancer with regards to Islamic teachings |
|
|
| Identify challenges to breast health |
|
|
| Enumerate the signs and symptoms of breast cancer and possible results of non-action |
|
|
| List possible early detection practices |
|
|
| Describe different ways to promote breast health |
|
|
| Encourage participants to sign a motivational contract to promote breast health as positive reinforcement |
|
|
Four Omani nursing students were trained to deliver the health education programme using a training manual developed by the research team. These trainee health educators were bilingual in Arabic and English and their nationality ensured that cultural sensitivity was maintained. The trainee health educators underwent 10 hours of training on the content of the programme, the research method being used, research ethics, various strategies and activities for delivering the programme and effective public speaking skills. The final training session included rehearsals and role-playing exercises to gauge the effectiveness of the training, ensure standardised delivery of the programme and simulate potential issues and questions. Rehearsals were attended by the research team, an oncologist and nursing faculty members specialising in community health. The attendees included both Arabic speakers to judge content delivery and non-Arabic speakers to judge body language and the method of delivery. During the final training session, the trainee health educators were explicitly instructed to avoid behaviours that could influence the results of the study, including providing additional explanations or clarifications not included in the content of the programme.
Four health education sessions using the programme were conducted by the trained health educators over a one-week period in February 2016 at three female-only fitness clubs in Muscat. The sessions were advertised several days beforehand via social media, text messages and posters. The sessions were open to all women regardless of their membership to the fitness club. Each session was conducted at the publicised time by two of the trained health educators. Women already present at the location at the time of each session were invited to participate in upcoming sessions. As the sample size for each session needed to be manageable for subsequent discussion groups while also sufficient for pre- and post-test quantitative evaluation of the programme, up to 15 women were recruited for each session via a convenience sampling method.6,10 Women ≤20 years old were included in the study due to the relatively high incidence of young women being diagnosed with breast cancer in Oman.3,4 A convenience sampling technique was used to find willing participants who were easily accessible and to minimise the attrition rate between pre- and post-session surveys. During the session, each participant was provided with a structured handout to record information on breast cancer signs and symptoms, risk factors and early detection practices.
A previously translated and adapted Arabic version of the breast module of the Cancer Awareness Measure (BCAM) was used to determine the effectiveness of the programme as an interventional tool for improving breast cancer awareness and early detection practices.31,32 The BCAM tool assesses awareness of breast cancer risk factors, signs and symptoms as well as knowledge and intentions regarding early detection practices.31 The modified translated survey has shown acceptable reliability and internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha values of 0.856 and 0.890 for the risk factors and warning signs subscales, respectively).32 The modified translated BCAM survey was distributed before and after each health education session. In addition, demographic information such as age, marital status, education and income level was recorded. Participants were requested not to discuss the survey questions among themselves and the health educators stressed the importance of completing both the pre- and post-session surveys. If a participant was unable to read Arabic or English, the trained health educators read the questions to them out loud in private and asked the participant to answer using one of the multiple-choice responses. Before the end of the session, the participants were informed that they might be invited at a later date to take part in focus group discussions in order to provide feedback on the sessions. Each session was audio-recorded by one of the health educators and an accompanying research assistant. Feedback on the session was analysed by the research team and the three academic experts from SQU and UJ during post-session debriefing meetings with the health educators.
Following this, focus group discussions were conducted in Arabic at each of the three fitness centres with groups of 10 women from each centre. Participants were randomly selected from the signup sheets of those who had previously taken part in the health education sessions. Two research assistants were trained to conduct the discussions, with one actively moderating the discussion and the other recording important observations and comments. The discussions focused on the organisation, time management, setting, content, flow, clarity, teaching style and delivery of the sessions. In addition, the participants were encouraged to voice their questions and concerns, remark on any unanswered questions and discuss the availability of information and resources about breast health in Oman. Each discussion was audio-recorded, transcribed and translated into English for qualitative analysis. However, the transcripts of the discussions were initially prepared in Arabic in order to improve the reliability of the feedback and to ensure that no information was lost during the translation process.
Quantitative data analysis was conducted using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), Version 21 (IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, USA). Mean overall pre- and post-session knowledge and positive intention scores were compared using a paired t-test at a 95% confidence level. Intentions to practice early detection behaviours were analysed using descriptive statistics. Qualitative data from the focus group discussions were analysed using thematic synthesis in which data were organised into essential themes, thus providing a more holistic view of the programme. Thematic consistency was ensured through peer review and expert consultations.
Ethical approval for this study was granted by the Ethics Committee of the College of Nursing, SQU (#SR/CON/MCHH/13/01). Informed consent was provided by all participants during the health education sessions. All women who wanted to take part in the health education sessions were allowed to participate, even if they subsequently chose not to complete the surveys or join the focus group discussions. Verbal consent to record the sessions and focus group discussions was given by all of the participants.
Results
Of the 53 participants, the majority were younger than 40 years old (83.0%), were married (54.7%), had been educated beyond the 12th grade (79.2%) and were employed (62.3%) [Table 3]. A total of 30 women (56.6%) participated in the pre- and post-session surveys to estimate the effectiveness of the health education programme as a tool to improve breast cancer awareness and knowledge. The overall mean knowledge score increased significantly following the health education session (8.43 ± 6.10 versus 23.43 ± 5.54; P <0.001). In addition, there was also a statistically significant increase in the women’s mean scores regarding positive intentions to undertake early detection practices (1.42 ± 1.31 versus 2.41 ± 1.03; P <0.001) [Table 4].
Table 3.
Demographic and socioeconomic characteristics of Omani women participating in a breast cancer health education programme (N = 53)
| Characteristic | n (%) |
|---|---|
| Age in years | |
| 20–29 | 24 (45.3) |
| 30–39 | 20 (37.7) |
| 40–49 | 7 (13.2) |
| ≥50 | 1 (1.9) |
| No response | 1 (1.9) |
| Nationality | |
| Omani | 45 (84.9) |
| Other | 8 (15.1) |
| Marital status | |
| Single | 24 (45.3) |
| Married | 29 (54.7) |
| Education level | |
| Up to 12th grade | 9 (17.0) |
| Beyond 12th grade | 42 (79.2) |
| No response | 2 (3.8) |
| Employment status | |
| Employed | 33 (62.3) |
| Unemployed | 19 (35.8) |
| No response | 1 (1.9) |
| Monthly income in OMR | |
| ≤500 | 2 (3.8) |
| 501–1,000 | 22 (41.5) |
| 1,001–1,500 | 7 (13.2) |
| 1,501–2,000 | 2 (3.8) |
| 2,001–2,500 | 3 (5.7) |
| ≥2,501 | 9 (17.0) |
| No response | 8 (15.1) |
OMR = Omani riyals.
Table 4.
Knowledge and positive intentions to undertake early detection practices before and after health education sessions among Omani women participating in a breast cancer health education programme (N = 30)
| Mean score ± SD | Difference (95% CI) | t | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Knowledge | ||||
| Pre-session | 8.43 ± 6.10 | 15.0 (12.2–17.8) | 11.12 | <0.001 |
| Post-session | 23.43 ± 5.54 | |||
| Positive intention | ||||
| Pre-session | 1.42 ± 1.31 | 1.0 (0.6–1.4) | 4.71 | <0.001* |
| Post-session | 2.41 ± 1.03 | |||
Calculated using a non-parametric approach.
Thematic analysis was undertaken of the feedback gathered from the health educators, research team, focus group discussions and audio recordings of the health education sessions. As a result of their experience and interactions with the participants, the health educators noted that the women appeared to have poor awareness of breast cancer signs and symptoms, risk factors and early detection practices. Nevertheless, the participants showed interest in the sessions, were engaged during the different sections of the programme and were curious, active and unreserved during discussions, openly sharing their personal issues, stories, experiences and questions. Most women reported that they were satisfied with the sessions overall, but expressed a need for more interaction or discussion time. Table 5 provides a summary of the themes and feedback that emerged from the focus group discussions. In line with this feedback, the recommendations of the participants, health educators and the research team were used to modify the health education programme. Table 6 illustrates the outline of a modified health education programme which is more interactive and allows for more discussion and questions, moving away from the previous lecture-focused programme.
Table 5.
Qualitative feedback from focus group discussions among selected Omani women following their participation in a breast cancer health education programme (N = 30)
| Theme | Issues | Challenges | Positives | Feedback |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Target audience and location of the health education sessions |
|
|
|
|
| Content of the health education sessions |
|
|
|
|
| Training of the health educators |
|
|
|
|
| Learning strategies, activities and materials |
|
|
|
|
| Attrition rate |
|
|
|
|
| Mode of delivery |
|
|
|
|
N/A = not applicable.
Table 6.
Outline of a modified health education programme for future use based on improvements gathered from feedback from health educators, participants and the research team
| Section | Content | Learning strategy |
|---|---|---|
| “Real life” story |
|
|
| Introduction |
|
|
| Breast cancer signs and symptoms |
|
|
| Risk factors for breast cancer |
|
|
| Early detection and screening practices |
|
|
| Pledge to promote breast health |
|
|
BSE = breast self-examination; CBE = clinical breast examination.
Discussion
According to the findings of the current study, the health education programme was found to significantly improve breast cancer knowledge scores among a cohort of Omani women. In addition, there was a significant increase in the number of women who intended to undertake early detection practices following the health education sessions. Based on the principles of the health promotion model, the programme was tailored to the individual characteristics, cultural values, behaviours and experiences of Muslim Omani women.27 By including certain tenets of motivational interviewing, the programme emphasised the integration of interpersonal and situational influences on the capacity of female Omanis to act positively for their own health, the intensification of their self-efficacy and empowerment and their intentions to detect breast cancer at an early stage and seek adequate breast health.33 As there is currently no official breast cancer screening programme in Oman, specific data on the use of screening methods such as mammography services are not readily available due to the voluntary nature of mammograms and clinical breast examinations; thus, it was impossible to compare the findings of the current study with any baseline use of these services in Oman.
In the current study, feedback from the participants, health educators and research team indicated certain modifications to the health education programme which might improve its effectiveness in increasing breast cancer awareness in Oman. Based on these recommendations, the improved programme would need to target a larger sample of women, including those who belong to lower socioeconomic and less educated backgrounds. In addition, the participants should be motivated to remain for the entire session, as well as participate more actively in any associated education or research activities. The health education programme should also incorporate answers to questions raised during the sessions and health educators should undergo more rigorous training in technical breast cancer knowledge and public speaking. Novel learning strategies and activities were recommended such as the use of relatable “real life” stories and the inclusion of actual breast cancer survivors and religious experts in the sessions. In addition, other strategies for future health education sessions include the use of a breast model to teach comprehensive breast self-examination techniques, dissemination of information on local breast cancer screening facilities in Oman and distribution of physical tokens/mementoes to remind participants of their pledge to maintain and promote breast health.
In the new health education programme, an emphasis on participant interaction would improve the fidelity of the programme content to the original ESRA breast cancer model, which is based on empowerment through awareness and identifies the main barriers present within three enabling systems.6 As women were the target population in the current study, the previous health education programme was able to extensively address cultural/religious/fatalistic barriers, although factors related to the personal/familial/environmental and healthcare-related systems were addressed only to a limited extent. It is recommended that the future health education programme involve stakeholders related to these two enabling systems, including family members, men, religious leaders and healthcare professionals, in order to enable these systems to support breast cancer awareness and early detection practices in Oman. Moreover, as this study measured only the immediate effects of a health education programme on breast cancer awareness, future studies should evaluate long-term behavioural effects. This is due to the fact that any changes in factors related to the three enabling systems—such as changes in personal beliefs, cultural values, social taboos and interpersonal relationships along with systematic improvements in breast health resources in Oman—would take place over time. As such, collecting evidence soon after the implementation of a health education programme would not provide an accurate depiction of its effects.
Despite the encouraging results of the present study, caution should be exercised before generalising the results to the Omani community as a whole. The study design relied on a convenience sampling method to recruit participants from three specific locations, since previous experience with random sampling in this topic has led to high attrition rates. This resulted in a cohort whom were primarily 20–39 years old and either regularly accessed or visited fitness clubs or were intending to become regular members. As such, the majority of the study sample were relatively more affluent and educated than the general population of Oman.
Conclusion
Breast cancer is a global healthcare challenge and there is a need to improve awareness and early breast cancer detection practices. In the current study, a culturally-tailored breast cancer health education programme was developed based on a previously described model. The programme was found to significantly increase breast cancer awareness and positive intentions to undertake early detection practices among a cohort of Omani women. Recommendations arising from feedback obtained from the health education sessions may be used to revise and improve the structure, content and delivery of the programme in the future. However, long-term behavioural outcomes need to be evaluated to ensure the effectiveness of this modified programme in promoting breast health among Omani women.
Footnotes
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
FUNDING
This study was funded by a grant from His Majesty Sultan Qaboos as part of the Strategic Research Fund, Muscat, Oman (#SR/CON/MCHH/13/01).
References
- 1.World Health Organization. Breast cancer: Prevention and control. [Accessed: Oct 2016]. From: www.who.int/cancer/detection/breastcancer/en/index1.html.
- 2.International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization. All cancers (excluding non-melanoma skin cancer): Estimated incidence, mortality and prevalence worldwide in 2012. [Accessed: Oct 2016]. From: globocan.iarc.fr/Pages/fact_sheets_cancer.aspx.
- 3.Kumar S, Burney IA, Al-Ajmi A, Al-Moundhri MS. Changing trends of breast cancer survival in Sultanate of Oman. J Oncol. 2011;2011:316243. doi: 10.1155/2011/316243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Al-Moundhri M, Al-Bahrani B, Pervez I, Ganguly SS, Nirmala V, Al-Madhani A, et al. The outcome of treatment of breast cancer in a developing country: Oman. Breast. 2004;13:139–45. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2003.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Al-Azri M, Al-Awisi H, Al-Rasbi S, El-Shafie K, Al-Hinai M, Al-Habsi H, et al. Psychosocial impact of breast cancer diagnosis among Omani women. Oman Med J. 2014;29:437–44. doi: 10.5001/omj.2014.115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Alkhasawneh E, Siddiqui ST, Leocadio M, Seshan V, Al-Farsi Y, Al-Moundhri MS. I do not even say “it”: A mixed methods study on breast cancer awareness of Omani women. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2016;17:2247–54. doi: 10.7314/APJCP.2016.17.4.2247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Donnelly TT, Al Khater AH, Al-Bader SB, Al Kuwari MG, Al-Meer N, Malik M, et al. Beliefs and attitudes about breast cancer and screening practices among Arab women living in Qatar: A cross-sectional study. BMC Womens Health. 2013;13:49. doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-13-49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Radi SM. Breast cancer awareness among Saudi females in Jeddah. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2013;14:4307–12. doi: 10.7314/APJCP.2013.14.7.4307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Alkhasawneh IM. Knowledge and practice of breast cancer screening among Jordanian women. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2007;34:1211–17. doi: 10.1188/07.ONF.1211-1217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Alkhasawneh IM, Akhu-Zaheya LM, Suleiman SM. Jordanian nurses’ knowledge and practice of breast self-examination. J Adv Nurs. 2009;65:412–16. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04891.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Parsa P, Kandiah M, Abdul Rahman H, Zulkefli NM. Barriers for breast cancer screening among Asian women: A mini literature review. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2006;7:509–14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Islam RM, Bell RJ, Billah B, Hossain MB, Davis SR. Awareness of breast cancer and barriers to breast screening uptake in Bangladesh: A population based survey. Maturitas. 2016;84:68–74. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2015.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ramathuba DU, Ratshirumbi CT, Mashamba TM. Knowledge, attitudes and practices toward breast cancer screening in a rural South African community. Curationis. 2015;38:1–8. doi: 10.4102/curationis.v38i1.1172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Gangane N, Anshu, Manvatkar S, Ng N, Hurtig AK, San Sebastián M. Prevalence and risk factors for patient delay among women with breast cancer in rural India. Asia Pac J Public Health. 2016;28:72–82. doi: 10.1177/1010539515620630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Yip CH, Buccimazza I, Hartman M, Deo VS, Cheung PS. Improving outcomes in breast cancer for low and middle income countries. World J Surg. 2015;39:686–92. doi: 10.1007/s00268-014-2859-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Othman AK, Kiviniemi MT, Wu YW, Lally RM. Influence of demographic factors, knowledge, and beliefs on Jordanian women’s intention to undergo mammography screening. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2012;44:19–26. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2011.01435.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Othman A, Ahram M, Obeidat RF, Obeidat N, Al-Tarawneh MR. Barriers for mammography among non-adherent women in Jordan: A national survey. Life Sci J. 2013;10:2268–74. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ramos AK, Correa A, Trinidad N. Perspectives on breast health education and services among recent Hispanic immigrant women in the Midwest: A qualitative study in Lancaster County, Nebraska. J Cancer Educ. 2016;31:666–72. doi: 10.1007/s13187-015-0886-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Shirazi M, Bloom J, Shirazi A, Popal R. Afghan immigrant women’s knowledge and behaviors around breast cancer screening. Psychooncology. 2013;22:1705–17. doi: 10.1002/pon.3216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Bickell NA, Weidmann J, Fei K, Lin JJ, Leventhal H. Underuse of breast cancer adjuvant treatment: Patient knowledge, beliefs, and medical mistrust. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:5160–7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.22.9773. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Hall CP, Wimberley PD, Hall JD, Pfriemer JT, Hubbard EM, Stacy AS, et al. Teaching breast cancer screening to African American women in the Arkansas Mississippi River Delta. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2005;32:857–63. doi: 10.1188/05.ONF.857-863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kline KN. Cultural sensitivity and health promotion: Assessing breast cancer education pamphlets designed for African American women. Health Commun. 2007;21:85–96. doi: 10.1080/10410230701283454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ouyang YQ, Hu X. The effect of breast cancer health education on the knowledge, attitudes, and practice: A community health center catchment area. J Cancer Educ. 2014;29:375–81. doi: 10.1007/s13187-014-0622-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Gandeh BS, Milaat WA. Effect of a breast cancer health education program on the awareness and practice of Jeddah female secondary school students. J Family Community Med. 2000;7:31–6. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Abd El Aziz HM, Akl OA, Ibrahim HK. Impact of a health education intervention program about breast cancer among women in a semi-urban area in Alexandria, Egypt. J Egypt Public Health Assoc. 2009;84:219–43. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Rezaeian M, Sharifirad G, Mostafavi F, Moodi M, Abbasi MH. The effects of breast cancer educational intervention on knowledge and health beliefs of women 40 years and older, Isfahan, Iran. J Educ Health Promot. 2014;3:43. doi: 10.4103/2277-9531.131929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Pender NJ, Murdaugh CL, Parsons MA. Health Promotion in Nursing Practice. 6th ed. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, USA: Pearson; 2010. pp. 250–355. [Google Scholar]
- 28.World Education Health Literacy Special Collection. Health education and adult literacy: Breast & cervical cancer - HEAL:BCC Curriculum. [Accessed: Oct 2016]. From: http://healthliteracy.worlded.org/heal/healBccHtml/index.htm.
- 29.John Snow Inc. JSI adolescent breast cancer curriculum. [Accessed: Oct 2016]. From: www.jsi.com/JSIInternet/Inc/Common/_download_pub.cfm?id=11148&lid=3.
- 30.Roberts NJ, Ghiassi R, Partridge MR. Health literacy in COPD. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2008;3:499–507. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S1088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Stubbings S, Robb K, Waller J, Ramirez A, Austoker J, Macleod U, et al. Development of a measurement tool to assess public awareness of cancer. Br J Cancer. 2009;101:S13–7. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Al-Khasawneh EM, Leocadio M, Seshan V, Siddiqui ST, Khan AN, Al-Manaseer MM. Transcultural adaptation of the Breast Cancer Awareness Measure. Int Nurs Rev. 2016;63:445–54. doi: 10.1111/inr.12265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Miller WR, Rollnick S. Motivational Interviewing: Preparing people for change. 2nd ed. New York, USA: Guilford Press; 2002. pp. 305–414. [Google Scholar]

