Abstract
The sperm’s crucial function is to locate and fuse with a mature oocyte. Under laboratory conditions, Caenorhabditis elegans sperm are very efficient at navigating the hermaphrodite reproductive tract and locating oocytes. Here, we identify chemosensory and oxygen-sensing circuits that affect the sperm’s navigational capacity. Multiple Serpentine Receptor B (SRB) chemosensory receptors regulate Gα pathways in gustatory sensory neurons that extend cilia through the male nose. SRB signaling is necessary and sufficient in these sensory neurons to influence sperm motility parameters. The neuropeptide Y pathway acts together with SRB-13 to antagonize negative effects of the GCY-35 hyperoxia sensor on spermatogenesis. SRB chemoreceptors are not essential for sperm navigation under low oxygen conditions that C. elegans prefers. In ambient oxygen environments, SRB-13 signaling impacts gene expression during spermatogenesis and the sperm’s mitochondria, thereby increasing migration velocity and inhibiting reversals within the hermaphrodite uterus. The SRB-13 transcriptome is highly enriched in genes implicated in pathogen defense, many of which are expressed in diverse tissues. We show that the critical time period for SRB-13 signaling is prior to spermatocyte differentiation. Our results support the model that young C. elegans males sense external environment and oxygen tension, triggering long-lasting downstream signaling events with effects on the sperm’s mitochondria and navigational capacity. Environmental exposures early in male life may alter sperm function and fertility.
Author summary
Habitat loss, disease, climate change, and pollution are thought to negatively affect animal fertility. Sperm are a potential target, but the molecular mechanisms are not understood. The nematode C. elegans is a powerful genetic model to investigate the relationship between environment and male fertility. The hermaphrodite’s transparent epidermis permits the direct visualization of migrating male sperm and fertilization. In this study, we identified multiple serpentine receptor B (SRB) chemosensory receptors that are expressed in amphid sensory neurons, which extend cilia through the male nose. These SRB chemoreceptors are necessary to produce sperm that are efficient at navigating the hermaphrodite reproductive tract to the fertilization site. We show that SRB-13 signaling counteracts the negative effect of GCY-35 O2 sensor activity, thereby maintaining sperm mitochondrial function and navigational capacity in hyperoxic conditions. Of particular interest, SRB-13 acts in early larval stage males prior to testis maturation. We propose that young males respond to specific stressful environments by altering SRB neural circuits, which in turn impact sperm mitochondrial function and motility. This chemosensory mechanism may be part of a systemic response in C. elegans males to external environment and oxygen levels.
Introduction
Animals employ sexual reproduction to increase genetic diversity critical for adapting to changing environments [1–3]. An essential process is fertilization, the merging of sperm and oocyte [4, 5]. The motile spermatozoa (referred to as sperm) is a highly specialized cell built for finding and fusing with a competent oocyte. This task is particularly difficult in female animals where fertilization occurs internally, due to the reproductive tract’s convoluted architecture [6, 7]. Sperm must successfully navigate through the tract in coordination with oocyte meiotic progression and compete with other sperm [8, 9]. Females often have sperm storage sites where sperm compete for entry into the oviduct or access to oocytes [10, 11]. Sperm motility is critical for navigation and competitive performance, yet varies extensively between, and within, species [12, 13]. Beyond sperm competition forces, what drives these performance differences is not clear [9].
Sperm contain glycolytic enzymes and mitochondria to produce energy or sequester Ca2+ for movement [14, 15]. Oxidative metabolism is more efficient than anaerobic metabolism, but an important byproduct is reactive oxygen species (ROS), which can damage sperm proteins, lipids, and paternal DNA [16]. Oxidative stress is thought to be a major factor in male infertility and sperm DNA damage [16–18]. In rodent species with different sperm competition levels, increased competition is associated with increased sperm oxidative metabolism, motility performance, and DNA damage measured in vitro [19, 20]. The extent to which sperm rely on aerobic metabolism may vary among environmental conditions. The relationship among environment, sperm metabolism, and sperm motility is not well understood, despite the potential importance for male fertility.
The nematode C. elegans produces extremely efficient sperm that circumnavigate fertilized eggs in the hermaphrodite uterus while migrating to the fertilization site or spermatheca [8, 21]. Developing oocytes secrete lipid guidance cues called prostaglandins [22–24]. Sperm respond to prostaglandins by increasing speed and directional velocity. Motility is driven by pseudopod translocation, a common feature among nematode species [25]. C. elegans sperm and flagellated sperm from other species share evolutionarily conserved metabolic pathways and cell surface proteins important for fertilization [26–28]. C. elegans exists in 2 sexes, hermaphrodites and males. Both sexes produce sperm, but the hermaphrodite reproductive tract is otherwise largely female. Hermaphrodite spermatids enter the spermatheca from the ovary, whereas male-derived spermatids are ejaculated through the vulva into the uterus during mating [29, 30]. Mixing of male-derived spermatids with seminal fluid triggers spermiogenesis, resulting in motile sperm [31]. Male-derived sperm migrate hundreds of microns around fertilized eggs to the spermatheca. As ovulating oocytes pass through the spermatheca, sperm (male or hermaphrodite) are often pushed out into the uterus and must crawl back. Oocyte prostaglandin deficiency causes inefficient targeting of male-derived sperm to the spermatheca and loss of hermaphrodite and male-derived sperm from the spermatheca and uterus along with passing eggs [8, 23].
Wild C. elegans colonize decomposing fruits and plants, where O2 tension is lower than the surface environment [32]. Although C. elegans prefers O2 concentrations around 8%–10% found in dense microbial habitats, O2 exposures are thought to fluctuate depending on local environment [32–34]. Ambient O2 triggers activation of the GCY-35/GCY-36 hyperoxia sensor, an atypical soluble guanylate cyclase heteromer that promotes aerotaxis behaviors [34]. The neuropeptide Y receptor (NPR-1) and its ligands FLP-18 and FLP-21 modulate these behaviors [35–37]. Most wild isolates aggregate under ambient laboratory conditions, presumably to reduce local O2 tension [34, 38]. During lab cultivation, the N2 Bristol strain acquired a gain-of-function mutation in npr-1 that suppresses aggregation behavior, alters pheromone responses, and reduces locomotion on plates seeded with Escherichia coli [39–41]. However, the role of hyperoxia-sensing circuitry in reproduction is largely unknown.
C. elegans uses an extensive repertoire of chemosensory G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) to detect microbes and pheromones [42]. Chemosensory GPCRs are expressed in amphid sensory neuron cilia that extend their tip through the worm’s nose. Here, we identify a compact genomic cluster of SRB class chemoreceptors that influence sperm navigation performance. SRB-13 functions in amphid single I (ASI) and/or amphid single K (ASK) sensory neurons, where it localizes to cilia exposed to the external environment. flp-21 and npr-1 act in the same genetic pathway as srb-13, but independently of aerotaxis behavior. SRB-13 antagonizes signaling output by the GCY-35 hyperoxia sensor, which functions to negatively affect sperm navigation performance. We show that SRB-13 signaling is important during early larval stages prior to testis maturation. Our data support the model that young C. elegans males alter neurosensory circuits involved in O2 sensing, depending on gustatory stimuli. These circuits impact gene expression during spermatogenesis important for mitochondrial function and sperm migration through the hermaphrodite uterus to the spermatheca.
Results
SRB chemoreceptor signaling improves sperm navigational performance
Male-derived sperm navigational performance is assessed in wild-type hermaphrodites. We measure fluorescent sperm distribution in the uterus 1 hour after mating and sperm motility parameters (i.e., velocity and reversal frequency) shortly after mating. Sperm distribution is assessed by dividing the uterus into 3 zones from vulva to spermatheca and counting fluorescent sperm in each zone [22, 24]. When control males are mated to hermaphrodites, approximately 90% of sperm reach zone 3, where a bottleneck forms at the spermathecal-uterine valve (Fig 1A and 1B). We previously found that the srb-13(ok3126) mutation causes qualitatively abnormal sperm distribution [23]. In this current study, we found that 66% of srb-13(ok3126) male-derived sperm accumulate in the third zone 1 hour after mating (Fig 1A and 1B). srb-13 encodes a predicted chemosensory GPCR. To investigate specificity, we screened a panel of 11 available GPCR mutants for sperm distribution effects. Initial investigation of available mutants found that only mutations in srb-5, srb-13, and srb-16 cause significant reductions in zone 3 targeting (Fig 1A and 1B and S1 Table). These related srb genes are physically clustered in a 22 kilobase pair region on chromosome II, together with 4 other srb class members (Fig 1C). The srb cluster is largely conserved in C. briggsae and C. remanei, but not in C. japonica and may have formed by gene duplication events during Caenorhabditis evolution (genome data available at www.wormbase.org).
To further investigate srb function, we used MosDEL and Cas9 genome-editing technologies [43, 44] to generate additional srb deletions (S1 Fig). The xm1 and xm15 deletions, which disrupt srb-13 and srb-12, respectively (Fig 1C), cause similar sperm-targeting defects (Fig 1A and 1B). The xmDf2 deletion, which disrupts srb-12, srb-13, and srb-16, causes a more severe defect than deletions disrupting single srb genes (Fig 1). Similarly, disrupting srb-2, srb-3, and srb-5 together causes a more severe defect than srb-5(tm5831) single mutants (Fig 1). When sperm targeting is assessed in srb mutant hermaphrodites mated to control males, male-derived sperm migrate efficiently to the spermatheca (S2 Table). Hence, srb mutations specifically affect intrinsic sperm properties and the srb mutant hermaphrodite reproductive tract is like the wild type. srb mutant hermaphrodites have reduced brood sizes with no apparent oogenesis defects (S2A Fig). These fertility deficits are reversed by mating to wild-type males and are thus due to defects in self-derived sperm, which could include reduced sperm production, reduced sperm motility, or other functional parameters. We conclude that srb chemoreceptors act in at least 2 parallel pathways to promote male-derived sperm targeting.
We used time-lapse video microscopy immediately after mating to determine the basis for the srb mutant sperm distribution defects. Spermatids from srb mutant males are similar in size to controls, activate for motility upon insemination, and are competent to fertilize oocytes (S3A Fig). Relative number of spermatids inseminated is also similar in control and srb mutant males (S3B Fig). However, srb mutations differentially impact sperm motility performance in the uterus. Compared to control sperm, srb-13 and srb-2,3,5(xmDf1) mutant sperm have mildly reduced velocities and reverse course frequently (Table 1). On the other hand, srb-16(gk774) and srb-5(tm5831) sperm migrate slower than control sperm (Table 1). srb-13,12,16(xmDf2) sperm are slow and reverse course frequently (Table 1). These motility defects are consistent with failure to respond effectively to prostaglandins, which stimulate sperm velocity and prevent reversals (Table 1) [22, 24]. When sperm competitiveness was evaluated, we found that srb-13,12,16(xmDf2) sperm are less competitive at fertilization than control and srb-13(xm1) sperm (S3C and S3D Fig). These data indicate that srb mutations, alone or in combination, primarily disrupt a sperm’s ability to navigate to the fertilization site and to compete with other sperm. srb mutant male sperm are similar to wild-type male sperm in fertilization ability and morphology, otherwise.
Table 1. Sperm motility values in hermaphrodite uteri.
Male genotype | Hermaphrodite genotype | Velocity (μm/min) | Directional velocity (μm/min) | Reversal frequency (rev/h) | Sperm (N) |
Gonad (N) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
control 1 | Wild type | 10.07 ± 0.49 | 5.57 ± 0.70 | 1.66 | 88 | 9 |
srb-13(ok3126) | Wild type | 7.20 ± 0.58* | 3.19 ± 0.95* | 4.19* | 40 | 4 |
srb-13(xm1) | Wild type | 7.66 ± 0.45* | 2.66 ± 0.54* | 5.66* | 101 | 9 |
srb-16(gk774) | Wild type | 4.84 ± 0.49* | 1.79 ± 0.61* | 2.61 | 40 | 6 |
srb-13,12,16(xmDf2) | Wild type | 4.92 ± 0.27* | 2.09 ± 0.31* | 6.68* | 134 | 11 |
srb-5(tm5831) | Wild type | 4.72 ± 0.45* | 3.23 ± 0.57* | 3.23 | 40 | 5 |
srb-2,3,4,5(xmDf1) | Wild type | 7.98 ± 0.59* | 2.57 ± 0.91* | 6.91* | 37 | 4 |
control 2 | Wild type | 7.51 ± 0.59 | 5.90 ±0.65 | 2.77 | 51 | 5 |
uaDf5 | Wild type | 3.09 ± 0.23* | 1.02 ±0.28* | 4.12 | 112 | 6 |
control 1 # | rme-2(b1008) | 3.68 ± 0.28 | 0.45 ± 0.32 | 9.46 | 75 | 6 |
Mean ± SEM. Directional velocity is toward the spermatheca. Control1 and srb mutant males are in the fog-2(q71) background. Control2 and uaDf5 mutant males are in the him-8(e1489) background.
*, p < 0.05, compared to the respective control. Sperm N, number of fluorescent sperm counted. Gonad N, the number of hermaphrodite gonad arms used to quantify sperm motility.
#, included from Kubagawa et al. [8] for reference. rme-2(b1008) mutant hermaphrodites are deficient in the production of prostaglandin sperm guidance cues.
Chemosensory GPCRs signal through heterotrimeric Gα, Gβ, and Gɣ proteins. Gα is divided into stimulatory Gsα, olfactory Goα, Gqα, and G12α [45]. Although Gα signaling is important for male mating behavior, we identified mutations in Gsα gsa-1, Goα goa-1, and Gqα egl-30 that permit sperm transfer in mass mating assays. The gsa-1(ce94gof) gain of function mutation did not affect sperm navigation (Fig 1A and 1B). In contrast, goa-1(sa734) loss of function and egl-30(tg26gof) gain of function males have strongly reduced sperm navigation performance, similar to srb-13,12,16(xmDf2) males (Fig 1A and 1B). This antagonistic relationship between GOA-1 and EGL-30 is also observed for motor neuron neurotransmission [45]. These data are consistent with SRB chemoreceptors regulating Goα and Gqα pathways.
SRB chemoreceptors function in amphid sensory neurons
SRB chemoreceptors could function autonomously in sperm, as previously hypothesized [23], or in other cell types. To investigate where SRB chemoreceptors function, we first examined available transgenic srb reporters [46]. The reporters show GFP (green fluorescent protein) expression in various larval and adult hermaphrodite and male sensory neurons in the head and tail (S2B and S2C Fig). Expression is not observed in gonads, although transgenes are typically silenced in the germ line. We focused on srb-13 and srb-16 male expression. The srb-13 reporter expresses GFP in 3 pairs of head sensory neurons called ASI, ASK, and AWB (amphid wing B), which extend dendrites with ciliated endings to the nose (Fig 2A). The srb-16 reporter shows broader expression throughout the nervous system in pharyngeal muscle, hermaphrodite vulva muscles, and the male tail. GFP is detectable in ASH (amphid single H), ASI, ASK, and AWB (Fig 2B). Therefore, transgenic reporters show srb-13 and srb-16 expression in amphid sensory neurons.
To determine endogenous SRB-13 and SRB-16 expression, we used Mos1 transposase and Cas9 to knock-in a tdTomato fluorescent tag into srb-13 and srb-16 genomic loci, respectively (Fig 2C and S4 Fig). SRB-13::tdTomato and SRB-16::tdTomato fusion proteins exhibit near wild-type function, as indicated by sperm navigation assays (S4G Fig). Male SRB-13::tdTomato expression is observed in 2 pairs of nose sensory cilia, their corresponding periciliary dendritic domains, and in puncta within neuron cell bodies (Fig 2D and S5A Fig). Cilia location and morphology [52] are consistent with ASI and ASK expression observed in the transgenic reporter (Fig 2A). Male SRB-16::tdTomato expression is observed in pm4 and pm5 pharyngeal muscles, I1 interneurons, and numerous head neuron cell bodies near the posterior pharyngeal bulb (Fig 2E). Cell body positions near the pharyngeal bulb are consistent with ASH, ASI, ASK, and AWB expression. SRB-16::tdTomato expression is observed in neuron cell bodies and dendrites, but not ciliated endings, contrasting with SRB-13::tdTomato (S5A and S5B Fig). Plasma membrane SRB-16::tdTomato is seen in pharyngeal (Fig 2E) and hermaphrodite vulva muscles. We could not detect evidence for srb chemoreceptor mRNA or protein expression in sperm or somatic gonadal cells (Fig 2F and 2G). Two bona fide sperm-expressed genes, spe-9 and spe-11 [50, 51], are abundantly expressed in the qPCR experiment (Fig 2F) and a control spe-9 tdTomato knock-in shows sperm expression (Fig 2G and S4C Fig). In summary, transgenic exogenous and endogenous srb reporters show expression in hermaphrodite and male amphid sensory neurons, but are not detectable in male somatic gonads or sperm.
To test whether srb-13 and srb-16 function in amphids, we generated transgenic mutant males expressing these chemoreceptors under specific neuron and muscle promoters (Fig 3). Expressing srb-13 in striated muscles using the myo-3 promoter does not rescue the srb-13(ok3126) sperm navigation defect. In contrast, expressing srb-13 pan-neuronally using the unc-119 promoter or specifically in ciliated sensory neurons using the osm-6 promoter does rescue the sperm localization phenotype (Fig 3). We confirmed transgenic srb-13 expression in appropriate male cell types using a functional srb-13::mCherry fusion (S5C and S5D Fig). Identical results are observed for srb-16 (Fig 3). Therefore, amphid srb-13 or srb-16 expression in respective null mutants is sufficient to promote sperm navigation.
We reasoned that downstream goa-1 and egl-30 Gα pathways should also function in amphid sensory neurons. To test this hypothesis, we expressed goa-1 in male amphids from a transgene using the osm-6 promoter. Sensory neuron goa-1 expression is sufficient to rescue the goa-1(sa734) sperm navigation defect (Fig 3). The egl-30(tg26gof) gain of function allele causes a strong navigation defect, suggesting that SRB signaling inhibits EGL-30 (Fig 1A and 1B). egl-30(tg26gof) encodes an R243Q substitution thought to affect guanine nucleotide binding [53]. To determine whether srb signaling is necessary in amphid neurons, we overexpressed EGL-30 R243Q in a wild-type background using the osm-6 promoter. The osm-6p::egl-30(tg26gof) transgene causes a significant sperm navigation defect (Fig 3). We conclude that SRB signaling is necessary and sufficient in ciliated amphid sensory neurons to promote sperm navigational performance. SRB chemoreceptors promote GOA-1 activity or repress EGL-30 activity (or both).
SRB-13 signaling impacts the sperm’s mitochondria
How does SRB chemoreceptor signaling influence sperm navigation? To help address this question, we used RNA-seq to compare transcriptomes of control males to srb-13(xm1) and srb-13,12,16(xmDf2) males (Fig 4A and S6A Fig). We identified numerous sperm-expressed transcripts that are altered in the mutant datasets compared to the control, including 8 major sperm protein (MSP) genes (S3 and S4 Tables). These data raise the possibility that SRB signals are transduced to the gonad, where they control gene expression in transcriptionally-active spermatocytes. Based on genetic analyses (Fig 1), altered RNA transcripts found in both srb-13(xm1) and srb-13,12,16(xmDf2) males are strong candidates for SRB-13-dependent regulation. We identified 266 altered genes common to both mutant male datasets (Fig 4B and S4 Table), the vast majority of which exhibited similar changes in each mutant line (Fig 4C). The srb-13 transcriptome is highly enriched in genes associated with pathogen defense, including those implicated in cuticle remodeling, detoxification, and intestinal microbial interactions (Fig 4H and S4 Table) [54]. Therefore, SRB-13 signaling is likely to influence gene expression in numerous cell types, perhaps as part of a systemic response. To identify potential genes expressed in spermatocytes, we filtered the dataset through the top 1,000 genes whose mRNA transcripts are most abundant in purified spermatids (Fig 4B) [55]. Thirty-three genes regulated by srb-13 overlap with the sperm dataset (S4 Table), approximately 2.5 times the number expected by chance alone. The 7 most abundant transcripts, which are all reduced 2–4-fold in srb-13(xm1) and srb-13,12,16(xmDf2) mutants, share a common feature (S4 Table). They all encode respiratory chain complex subunits derived from the mitochondrial genome (Fig 4B and S6B Fig). These data support the model that SRB chemoreceptors influence gene expression in developing spermatocytes and other cell types.
To test whether SRB-13 modulates expression of genes involved in oxidative metabolism in sperm precursors, we isolated spermatids from control and srb-13(xm1) males. The C. elegans mitochondrial genome encodes 12 protein complex subunits, 2 ribosomal RNAs, and 22 transfer RNAs (Fig 4D) [56]. Using RT-qPCR (real-time quantitative PCR) to compare RNA levels from isolated spermatids, we detected significant reductions in 9/13 tested transcripts in srb-13(xm1) mutant spermatids (Fig 4E). The 18S and 23S ribosomal RNAs were unchanged in RNA-seq and qPCR analyses (Fig 4E and S6B Fig). These results suggest that specific mitochondrial transcripts are destabilized in srb-13 mutant sperm, as precursor polycistronic RNA is processed to generate individual polyadenylated transcripts [56]. Consistent with these data, sperm from control and srb mutant males have similar mitochondrial content, visualized using Mitotracker dye (Fig 1A). We conclude that SRB-13 increases mitochondrial electron transport subunit RNA levels in spermatids.
To investigate the impact of altered expression of genes encoding respiratory chain complex subunits on sperm motility, we examined the uaDf5 strain [57, 58]. The uaDf5 mutation is a mitochondrial genome deletion eliminating 4 subunits (Fig 4D). uaDf5 males exhibit stable heteroplasmy from mutant and wild-type mitochondrial genomes, causing overall alterations in several mitochondrial transcripts and mild mitochondrial dysfunction (S6C–S6E Fig) [59]. uaDf5 males generate sperm that fail to efficiently navigate the uterus (Fig 4F and 4G). Time-lapse videos show that uaDf5 mutant sperm migrate with reduced velocity and directional velocity, similar to sperm from srb mutant males (Table 1). srb-13 and uaDf5 mutant males have altered transcripts from multiple respiratory chain complexes, including complex I (Fig 4E and S6E Fig). The nuclear-encoded nuo-6(qm200) mutation, which mildly reduces complex I function [60], also causes less efficient sperm navigation (Fig 4F and 4G). Another transcript reduced in both srb mutant datasets encodes the ubiquitous mitochondrial fission mediator drp-1 (S4 Table). Sperm from drp-1(tm1108) mutant males fail to efficiently target the spermatheca (Fig 4F and 4G). These results support the model that SRB-13 promotes expression or stability of RNAs in developing spermatocytes and/or spermatids that are important for mitochondrial function.
Mitochondria in sperm are known to perform at least 2 functions important for navigation: ATP production and Ca2+ buffering. Cytosolic Ca2+ enters the mitochondrial matrix through the mitochondrial Ca2+ uniporter [61]. mcu-1 encodes the C. elegans ortholog of the Mcu (mitochondrial calcium uniporter) gene, an essential component of the uniporter [61]. mcu-1(ju1154) deletion mutant hermaphrodites and males are fertile, although the mutant males have slightly reduced sperm-targeting efficiency compared to control males (Fig 4G). Importantly, mcu-1(ju1154) suppresses the srb-13 mutant sperm navigation defect and partially suppresses the srb-13,12,16(xmDf2) defect (Fig 4G). The mcu-1 data support the hypothesis that srb-13 mutant sperm have altered mitochondrial Ca2+ buffering capacity important for navigation.
SRB-13 makes sperm development refractory to inhibitory effects of a hyperoxia sensor(s)
To better understand how SRB signaling in amphids influences sperm, we screened a panel of 15 neuropeptide gene mutants for those affecting sperm navigation (Fig 5A and 5B and S5 Table). Neuropeptides are often used by C. elegans to integrate chemoreceptor pathways with interneuron and endocrine circuits. Sperm navigation is not affected by mutations in any of 13 genes encoding various neuropeptides, including the daf-7 TGF-β homolog [24, 62] (Fig 5A and 5B and S5 Table). However, loss of the FMRF (Phenylalanine-Methionine-Arginine-Phenylalanine) amide-related neuropeptides flp-18 or flp-21 causes sperm navigation defects similar to srb mutants (Fig 5A and 5B). FLP-18 and FLP-21 are ligands for the neuropeptide Y receptor homolog NPR-1 [36, 40]. Indeed, npr-1 loss in males impairs sperm navigation (Fig 5A and 5B). As FLP-18 may bind multiple receptors, we focused on FLP-21 [36, 63]. To test whether flp-21 acts in the same genetic pathway as srb-13, we constructed srb-13(xm1); flp-21(ok889) double-mutant males. The double mutants do not exhibit an additive sperm phenotype relative to single mutants, indicating that srb-13 and flp-21 act in the same genetic pathway (Fig 5A and 5B). Similarly, we did not observe additive phenotypes for srb-12(xm15); flp-21(ok889) double or srb-13,12,16(xmDf2); flp-21(ok889) quadruple mutants relative to respective control mutants (Fig 5A and 5B). An examination of the histogram shown in Fig 5B indicates that more sperm target zone 3 from srb-13,12,16(xmDf2); flp-21(ok889) males relative to srb-13,12,16(xmDf2) males, suggesting that flp-21 has complex actions in multiple srb pathways. These data suggest that SRB chemoreceptors interact with neuropeptide Y receptor circuitry to promote sperm navigation.
A major function of NPR-1 is to inhibit signaling output from the GCY-35/GCY-36 hyperoxia sensor [34, 64]. To test whether the sperm distribution defects in srb mutants are suppressed by gcy-35 loss, we generated srb-13(xm1); gcy-35(ok769) double and srb-13,12,16(xmDf2); gcy-35(ok769) quadruple mutant males. gcy-35 loss alone does not affect sperm navigation (Fig 5B). However, gcy-35 loss fully suppresses the srb-13(xm1) male defect and partially suppresses srb-13,12,16(xmDf2) triple mutant male defect (Fig 5A and 5B). Another NPR-1 function is to promote solitary feeding behavior at 21% O2 [39, 41], suggesting that feeding behavior might affect sperm navigation. Contrary to this idea, single and combinatorial srb mutants exhibit solitary behavior, with the sole exception of srb-12(xm15) worms that mildly aggregate. Furthermore, numerous wild C. elegans isolates that exhibit social feeding behavior have excellent sperm performance (S7 Fig). Therefore, SRB signaling is not essential for all npr-1 functions, and feeding behavior is not responsible for the srb mutant sperm navigation defect. Two additional key conclusions are 1) gcy-35 negatively impacts sperm navigation, and 2) srb-13 acts upstream of, or in parallel to, gcy-35 to antagonize gcy-35 signaling output.
Ambient (21%) O2 found in laboratory worm cultures triggers GCY-35 activation [34, 39, 64], raising the possibility that hyperoxia signaling is responsible for the srb mutant sperm migration defects. To test whether O2 concentration impacts sperm navigation, we exposed control and srb mutant males to 10% O2 and mated them to hermaphrodites raised at ambient O2. In these experiments, males were exposed to 10% O2 throughout larval development and early adulthood, prior to and during the spermatogenic period. Mating and sperm navigation assays were performed under ambient conditions (Fig 5C). When males are raised at 10% O2, sperm navigation is like that seen for the 21% O2 control, regardless of the presence or absence of srb genes (Fig 5A and 5B). For instance, sperm from srb mutant males raised under 10% O2 target the spermatheca as efficiently as control males raised at ambient O2. Importantly, when males are raised at ambient O2, srb genes are essential for sperm navigation (Fig 5A and 5B). Collectively, these results demonstrate that SRB signaling antagonizes the negative effect of GCY-35 and possibly another hyperoxia sensor on sperm motility.
SRB-13 activity is critical prior to spermatogenesis onset
The SRB-13 transcriptome includes genes that encode proteins implicated in various aspects of metabolism, detoxification, and pathogen defense (Fig 4H and S4 Table). We considered the possibility that SRB pathways or sperm are sensitive to environmental, behavioral, or genetic perturbations impacting organismal physiology. Contrary to this notion, growing control males at 10% O2 or at different temperatures (16–25°C) does not affect sperm performance (S6 Table). Aggregation behavior, which can impact O2 exposure and food intake [33, 34], does not correlate with sperm performance (S7 Fig). For example, the LSJ1 strain is a sibling stock of N2 isolated from Bristol, England circa 1950 [65]. Although LSJ1 and N2 exhibit differences in aggregation and feeding behavior [65], males from both strains generate sperm with excellent performance under lab conditions (S6 Table). Three highly divergent C. elegans strains are exceptions (see Discussion). Male diets of E. coli strains such as NA22, OP50, or HT115 do not appreciably impact sperm navigation (S6 Table). Furthermore, food deprivation in adult males for 24 hours does not alter sperm performance, provided males are briefly fed to enable mating (S6 Table). Genetic mutations in males such as daf-7(m62) that alter fat metabolism [66] and clk-1(e2519) that delay development [67] have little impact on sperm migration (S6 Table). In addition, we did not observe changes in sperm performance in males grown in isolation, males exposed to hermaphrodites or other males, or males in dense populations. These data suggest that SRB-13 affects sperm navigation independent of changes in aggregation behavior, pheromones, and organismal physiology.
SRB-13 could affect spermatocytes/spermatids through a direct neuroendocrine pathway or through an indirect pathway(s) mediated by other cell types. The timing of SRB-13 signaling could provide an important clue. SRB-13 is expressed throughout larval development and adulthood, whereas spermatogenesis initiates in the mid L4 stage. To determine the critical time period for srb-13 activity, we used the Q system, a drug-inducible binary gene expression system [68, 69]. QF (quinic acid 1F transcriptional activator) binds a 16-base pair sequence called QUAS to activate gene transcription (Fig 6A). QS (quinic acid 1S transcriptional repressor) blocks QUAS-dependent transcription mediated by QF. Quinic acid (QA), which is added to plates, inhibits QS repressor activity, thereby activating gene expression that is detectable roughly 6 hours after application [68, 69]. We used the osm-6 promoter to drive QF and QS expression in male amphid sensory neurons and the QUAS promoter to drive srb-13 expression (Fig 6A and 6B). QA did not have a negative effect on sperm motility in control males lacking the Q system (Fig 6C and 6D). QA treatment to males expressing the Q system is required to produce functional SRB-13, as evidenced by rescue of the srb-13(xm1) sperm navigation defect (Fig 6C and 6D). We grew srb-13(xm1) males that had wild-type srb-13 under Q system control starting from L1, L3, L4, or young adult stages (Fig 6B). Initiating SRB-13 expression at the L1 or L3 stage rescues the srb-13(xm1) sperm navigation defect (Fig 6C and 6D). In contrast, expressing SRB-13 at the L4 or adult stages does not rescue, despite QA treatment for 48 and 24 hours, respectively (Fig 6C and 6D). Therefore, SRB-13 expression is not sufficient during L4, when spermatocytes start to form, to improve sperm navigation performance. SRB-13 activity must initiate during early larval stages and is likely to impact the sperm’s mitochondria through lasting effects (such as epigenetic changes) to germ cells or other cell types.
Discussion
The sperm cell is designed to deliver a single chromosome set to a waiting oocyte, whose own chromosomes are ready to pair. The delivery is a difficult journey that depends upon the ability to move long distances, sometimes in hostile environments, and locate a suitable fusion partner. Many animal species make far more sperm than available oocytes [9]. In male mammals, sperm motility parameters can vary extensively in ejaculates collected from different genetic backgrounds and at different times or places [12, 13, 70]. Not all animals are so wasteful when it comes to sperm. Drosophila and C. elegans generate sperm with much better fertilization chances [21, 71]. The C. elegans sperm is well known for prodigious success rate, which requires prostaglandin positional cues provided by oocytes [22, 23]. Chemical attractants are widely used by female animals to guide sperm towards oocytes [72]. Here, we discover molecular elements of a signaling mechanism coupling environmental cues to sperm success rates.
Our results support the following model (Fig 7). SRB chemoreceptors act in ciliated amphid sensory neurons within the male nose to detect external cues. SRB signaling activates GOA-1 Goα or inhibits EGL-30 Gqα in amphids. These pathways are integrated with neuropeptide Y receptor circuitry that also modulates aerotaxis and food-searching behaviors [33, 38]. SRB pathways are not essential in low O2 environments, presumably found in dense microbial habitats. In ambient O2 environments, GCY-35 hyperoxia sensor activity increases, triggering an inhibitory effect on spermatogenesis that reduces sperm navigational performance. SRB-13 antagonizes GCY-35 signaling output by impacting the sperm’s mitochondria. These mitochondrial alterations increase sperm migration velocity and decrease reversals within the hermaphrodite uterus. SRB-13 signals may initiate a systemic transcriptional response with trade-off to males dependent on environment and oxidative metabolism (Fig 7). Consistent with this idea, the SRB-13 transcriptome includes genes expressed in multiple tissues and SRB-13 activity is critical prior to spermatogenesis onset in L4. SRB chemoreceptors appear to be constitutively active under lab conditions, raising the possibility that environmental cues not normally encountered in the lab antagonize SRB pathways. We propose that SRB-13 signaling counteracts the negative effects of high O2 levels, so as to maintain efficient mitochondrial function and sperm motility. Below we further discuss the data and our interpretations.
To find food, C. elegans crawls into hypoxic microbial colonies often located within rotting vegetation [32]. SRB signaling is not required in hypoxic (10% O2) lab environments, likely due in part to low GCY-35 activity. When grown under ambient conditions that increase GCY-35 signaling, srb mutant males produce morphologically normal-looking sperm that are capable of fertilization, but the sperm target the spermatheca less efficiently than wild-type sperm. In these experiments, mating and sperm navigation assays are done at ambient O2, so the only environmental condition that is altered is O2 tension during larval development and early adulthood. These data indicate that SRB chemoreceptors antagonize the negative effect that hyperoxia circuitry has on spermatogenesis. They also indicate that SRB pathways are not permissive for spermatogenesis, because they are not essential in all environments. srb-13 acts either upstream of, or in parallel to, gcy-35 and possibly another O2 sensor to affect sperm motility. SRB chemoreceptors appear to integrate external information into neuroendocrine pathways that respond to hyperoxic (i.e., ambient) conditions. Aerotaxis and food-searching behaviors might be involved in the response, but they are unlikely to cause the srb mutant sperm motility defects.
RNA-seq data from whole males shows that srb chemoreceptors affect expression of genes involved in pathogen defense, oxidative metabolism, detoxification, and sperm-specific functions. Many of these genes are expressed in diverse tissues, consistent with a systemic transcriptional response [37, 54, 73]. For instance, srb-13 promotes expression of the cytochrome P450 cyp-13A12 (S4 Table), which is expressed in pharyngeal marginal cells and regulates a behavioral response to changes in O2 [74]. Specific RNAs derived from the mitochondrial genome that encode complex I, III, IV, and V subunits are reduced in isolated srb-13 mutant spermatids, indicating that SRB-13 affects mitochondrial gene expression. A potential mechanism involves RNA stability, as several RNAs in the same polycistronic transcript are unaffected and mitochondrial content is similar in srb-13 mutant and control sperm. Moreover, electron transport chain complex subunit mRNAs encoded in the nuclear genome are unaffected. Based on analysis of complex I mutants, uaDf5 mutants, and drp-1 mutants, srb-13 loss is hypothesized to alter sperm mitochondrial function. Further support comes from the finding that the srb-13 mutant sperm navigation defect is suppressed by reduced mitochondrial Ca2+ uniporter activity. The working model is that SRB-13 affects the expression or stability of multiple RNA transcripts in spermatids or their precursors, likely through a neuroendocrine mechanism. These SRB-13 targets may act together to influence oxidative metabolism during spermatogenesis and the mature sperm’s Ca2+ buffering capacity.
Most natural C. elegans isolates sampled exhibit excellent sperm performance under laboratory conditions, despite differences in aerotaxis and feeding behaviors (S7 Fig). Three exceptions are highly divergent strains from Hawaii and California. N2 Bristol differs from the Hawaiian CB4856 strain in O2-sensing circuit activity, due in part to polymorphisms in npr-1 [34, 39–41]. CB4856 males generate sperm with poor navigation performance at ambient O2, suggesting that SRB signaling is suppressed (S7 Fig). The N2 npr-1 allele confers gain of neuropeptide Y signaling that prevents social aggregation. N2 NPR-1 (215V) responds to FLP-18 and FLP-21 ligands [36], both of which are essential for sperm navigation. CB4856 NPR-1 (215F) only responds to FLP-21, reducing NPR-1 activity. N2 NPR-1 is thought to diminish aggregation-promoting pheromone signaling in ASK, triggering solitary behavior [41]. Our genetic data are consistent with NPR-1 promoting SRB-13 signaling. Two key points are that SRB pathways are active in N2 and many other isolates under lab conditions and have little effect on aggregation behavior, with the exception of srb-12. Spermatogenesis in strains like CB4856 appears to be more sensitive to ambient O2 than spermatogenesis in N2 Bristol and related strains.
Why does an O2-sensing pathway impact sperm function? The simplest idea is that there are positive and negative consequences to sperm or other cell types dependent on SRB-13 and environment (Fig 7). Environmental exposures during early development could be indicative of future stressful conditions. For example, O2 and mitochondria are important for fertility, but they also produce toxic ROS, which is associated with DNA damage and reduced fertilization success in many species [20, 75]. In environments where ROS levels are likely to be elevated, C. elegans males may try to reduce oxidative damage to germ cells and other cells. In this model, the GCY-35 hyperoxia sensor functions to limit deleterious effects of O2 on spermatogenesis, but at the cost of sperm navigational performance. Another non-mutually exclusive idea is that males respond to stress-related cues by changing energy investment in spermatogenesis. Ambient O2 might be a sign of low food availability. SRB signaling improves male fertility in ambient environments, but possibly at the cost of increased energy needs. A potential complication is that SRB expression is not sexually dimorphic, and brood size defects are found in srb mutant hermaphrodites. SRB pathways may affect spermatogenesis differently in hermaphrodites and males. Future studies are needed to investigate potential costs and benefits of SRB signaling, as well as external cues that modulate SRB chemoreceptors.
In conclusion, our results support the unexpected model that environmental exposures to young C. elegans males impact sperm mitochondrial function(s) during adulthood. The sperm’s mitochondria are important for efficiently navigating through the female reproductive tract, possibly in part through regulating cytosolic Ca2+ levels that modulate migration velocity and reversal frequency. An important implication for all animals is that environmental conditions during early development might have lasting effects on sperm function in adults. Better understanding of these mechanisms could be used to help prevent male infertility and help overcome detrimental consequences of oxidative metabolism to reproduction.
Materials and methods
C. elegans strains
C. elegans were maintained at 20°C and incubated with NA22 E. coli bacteria, unless otherwise indicated [8, 24]. A strain list is provided in the Supporting Experimental Procedures (S1 Text). Males were generated by mating spontaneously-occurring males to hermaphrodites or by using mutations, such as fog-2(q71), him-5(e1490), or him-8(e1489) that increase male frequency in populations without affecting sperm navigation [76, 77].
Bacterial strains and growth
E. coli bacterial strains were grown in LB to an OD600 of 0.5. Cultures were then spread on NGM plates and incubated for 1–2 days. Adult worms were transferred to these plates and allowed to lay eggs. Hatched larvae were grown in the bacteria until adulthood, unless indicated otherwise. For starvation experiments, males were washed extensively and placed on unseeded plated for 24 hours. Mating was performed on a 1-cm food drop for 30 minutes.
RNA purification and cDNA synthesis
Synchronized adult males were isolated using 35 μm and 20 μm pore-size nets, centrifuged, and frozen. Worm pellets were homogenized with a Bullet Blender 5 (Next Advance). Total RNA was extracted with Trizol (Invitrogen). cDNAs were synthesized from total RNA using the Cloned AMV 1st strand cDNA synthesis kit (Invitrogen) and oligo dT primers.
Spermatid isolation
Synchronized adult males were separated from hermaphrodite by using 35 μm and 20 μm pore-size nets [78, 79]. To liberate spermatids, pressure was applied to males using a large vice and plexiglass plates. The released spermatids were isolated using 10 μm nets and examined under a stereoscope.
RT-qPCR
RT-qPCR was performed with SYBR green real-time PCR master mix in an ABI Prism 7500 system (Applied Biosystems).
RNA sequencing
Sequencing and bioinformatics analyses were performed by Dr. Michael Crowley and Dr. David Crossman at the UAB Heflin Center for Genomic Science Core Laboratories using a NextGen Illumina platform.
Molecular cloning
pXM1-, pXMDF1-, and pXMDF2-targeting vectors were generated by the Multisite Gateway 3-Fragment system (Invitrogen). pXM4 targeting vector was generated by sequential restriction digest. All other vectors were generated by Gibson assembly (New England Biolabs). Plasmids were sequenced for verification. The vector construction primers are listed in S7 Table.
Transgenic animal generation
The ugt-62p::mCherry::unc-54 3’UTR transgenic array (from plasmid pUM62) was integrated randomly into the C. elegans genome using gamma irradiation (4,000 rad). A line with an X chromosome integration event was backcrossed to the wild type 4 times and used for analysis. All other transgenes were maintained as extrachromosomal arrays.
Animal imaging
Images were taken using a Zeiss Axioskop equipped with epifluorescence (Thornwood, NY) or Nikon 2000U inverted confocal microscope (Melville, KY).
Genome editing
srb-13(xm1), srb-13,12,16(xmDf2), and srb-2,3,4,5(xmDf1) knock-outs were generated by MosDEL [43]. The srb-13(xm4) tdTomato knock-in was generated by removing the Mos1 transposon to generate a double-strand DNA break. srb-16(xm10) and spe-9(xm14) tdTomato knock-ins were generated using Cas9 endonuclease to generate breaks [44, 80]. The C. briggsae unc-119 gene was used as a selection marker. The srb-12(xm15) knock-out was generated using co-conversion CRISPR [81].
Sperm navigation assays
Briefly, CMX-ROS Mitotracker (Invitrogen)-stained males were mated to unstained hermaphrodite for 30 minutes [8, 22]. Hermaphrodites were then isolated and allowed to rest on food for 1 hour. Florescent and DIC snapshots of the uterus were used to determine sperm distribution. The distance from spermatheca to vulva is divided into 3 zones, with zone 3 closest to spermatheca. To directly observe sperm motility, mated hermaphrodites were mounted immediately on a 2% agarose pad for time-lapse fluorescence microscopy. DIC and fluorescence images were taken every 30 seconds. Directional velocity toward the spermatheca was measured by creating a straight line through the uterus from the vulva to the spermatheca.
Statistical tests
Two-tail Student t test, Mann-Whitney U test, and one-tail Fisher’s exact test were used for statistics.
Supporting information
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Michael Crowley, Dr. David Crossman, and the UAB Heflin Center for Genomic Science Core Laboratories for performing RNA-seq and bioinformatics analyses. We also thank Dr. Sung Min Han, Dr. Rob Steele, Dr. David Greenstein, Dr. Asher Cutter, Dr. Brad Yoder, Dr. Etty Benveniste, Dr. Chenbei Chang, Dr. Dan Gorelick, Dr. Gordon Meares, Dr. Hao Yu, Dr. Dawn Landis, Scott Henke, and Miller lab members for reagents, assistance with RT-qPCR, confocal microscopy, or comments on the manuscript. Some strains were generously provided by the Caenorhabditis Genetics Center, the Japanese National Bioresource Project, and the NEMAGENTAG consortium.
Abbreviations
- ASH
amphid single H
- ASI
amphid single I
- ASK
amphid single K
- AWB
amphid wing B
- FMRF
Phenylalanine-Methionine-Arginine-Phenylalanine
- GFP
green fluorescent protein
- GPCR
G protein-coupled receptor
- MSP
major sperm protein
- NPR-1
neuropeptide Y receptor
- QA
quinic acid
- QF
quinic acid 1F transcriptional activator
- QS
quinic acid 1S transcriptional repressor
- ROS
reactive oxygen species
- RT-qPCR
real-time quantitative PCR
- SRB
serpentine receptor B
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
National Institutes of Health (grant number R01 GM085105). Received by MAM. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Hartfield M. Evolutionary genetic consequences of facultative sex and outcrossing. J Evol Biol. 2016;29(1):5–22. doi: 10.1111/jeb.12770 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Smith M. The Evolution of Sex. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1978. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Goddard MR, Godfray HC, Burt A. Sex increases the efficacy of natural selection in experimental yeast populations. Nature. 2005;434(7033):636–40. doi: 10.1038/nature03405 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Marcello MR, Singaravelu G, Singson A. Fertilization. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2013;757:321–50. Epub 2012/08/09. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-4015-4_11 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Evans JP, Florman HM. The state of the union: the cell biology of fertilization. Nat Cell Biol. 2002;4 Suppl:s57–63. doi: 10.1038/ncb-nm-fertilityS57 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Suarez SS. Regulation of sperm storage and movement in the mammalian oviduct. Int J Dev Biol. 2008;52(5–6):455–62. doi: 10.1387/ijdb.072527ss . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hoang HD, Miller MA. Sperm Navigation Mechanisms in the Female Reproductive Tract. Results Probl Cell Differ. 2017;59:241–67. Epub 2017/03/02. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-44820-6_9 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kubagawa HM, Watts JL, Corrigan C, Edmonds JW, Sztul E, Browse J, et al. Oocyte signals derived from polyunsaturated fatty acids control sperm recruitment in vivo. Nat Cell Biol. 2006;8(10):1143–8. doi: 10.1038/ncb1476 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Simmons LW, Fitzpatrick JL. Sperm wars and the evolution of male fertility. Reproduction. 2012;144(5):519–34. doi: 10.1530/REP-12-0285 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Neubaum DM, Wolfner MF. Wise, winsome, or weird? Mechanisms of sperm storage in female animals. Curr Top Dev Biol. 1999;41:67–97. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Holt WV, Fazeli A. Sperm Storage in the Female Reproductive Tract. Annu Rev Anim Biosci. 2016;4:291–310. doi: 10.1146/annurev-animal-021815-111350 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Gomendio M, Malo AF, Garde J, Roldan ER. Sperm traits and male fertility in natural populations. Reproduction. 2007;134(1):19–29. doi: 10.1530/REP-07-0143 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Jorgensen N, Andersen AG, Eustache F, Irvine DS, Suominen J, Petersen JH, et al. Regional differences in semen quality in Europe. Hum Reprod. 2001;16(5):1012–9. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.du Plessis SS, Agarwal A, Mohanty G, van der Linde M. Oxidative phosphorylation versus glycolysis: what fuel do spermatozoa use? Asian J Androl. 2015;17(2):230–5. doi: 10.4103/1008-682X.135123 ; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Luo SM, Schatten H, Sun QY. Sperm mitochondria in reproduction: good or bad and where do they go? J Genet Genomics. 2013;40(11):549–56. doi: 10.1016/j.jgg.2013.08.004 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Gavriliouk D, Aitken RJ. Damage to Sperm DNA Mediated by Reactive Oxygen Species: Its Impact on Human Reproduction and the Health Trajectory of Offspring. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2015;868:23–47. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-18881-2_2 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Gosalvez J, Tvrda E, Agarwal A. Free radical and superoxide reactivity detection in semen quality assessment: past, present, and future. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2017. Epub 2017/03/28. doi: 10.1007/s10815-017-0912-8 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Aitken RJ, De Iuliis GN. On the possible origins of DNA damage in human spermatozoa. Mol Hum Reprod. 2010;16(1):3–13. Epub 2009/08/04. doi: 10.1093/molehr/gap059 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Tourmente M, Villar-Moya P, Rial E, Roldan ER. Differences in ATP Generation Via Glycolysis and Oxidative Phosphorylation and Relationships with Sperm Motility in Mouse Species. J Biol Chem. 2015;290(33):20613–26. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M115.664813 ; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.delBarco-Trillo J, Garcia-Alvarez O, Soler AJ, Tourmente M, Garde JJ, Roldan ER. A cost for high levels of sperm competition in rodents: increased sperm DNA fragmentation. Proc Biol Sci. 2016;283(1826). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2015.2708 ; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Singson A. Every sperm is sacred: fertilization in Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev Biol. 2001;230(2):101–9. doi: 10.1006/dbio.2000.0118 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Hoang HD, Prasain JK, Dorand D, Miller MA. A heterogeneous mixture of F-series prostaglandins promotes sperm guidance in the Caenorhabditis elegans reproductive tract. PLoS Genet. 2013;9(1):e1003271 Epub 2013/02/06. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003271 ; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Edmonds JW, Prasain JK, Dorand D, Yang Y, Hoang HD, Vibbert J, et al. Insulin/FOXO signaling regulates ovarian prostaglandins critical for reproduction. Dev Cell. 2010;19(6):858–71. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2010.11.005 ; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.McKnight K, Hoang HD, Prasain JK, Brown N, Vibbert J, Hollister KA, et al. Neurosensory perception of environmental cues modulates sperm motility critical for fertilization. Science. 2014;344(6185):754–7. doi: 10.1126/science.1250598 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Roberts TM, Stewart M. Nematode sperm locomotion. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1995;7(1):13–7. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Nishimura H, Tajima T, Comstra HS, Gleason EJ, L'Hernault SW. The Immunoglobulin-like Gene spe-45 Acts during Fertilization in Caenorhabditis elegans like the Mouse Izumo1 Gene. Curr Biol. 2015;25(24):3225–31. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.10.056 ; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Singaravelu G, Rahimi S, Krauchunas A, Rizvi A, Dharia S, Shakes D, et al. Forward Genetics Identifies a Requirement for the Izumo-like Immunoglobulin Superfamily spe-45 Gene in Caenorhabditis elegans Fertilization. Curr Biol. 2015;25(24):3220–4. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.10.055 ; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Han SM, Cottee PA, Miller MA. Sperm and oocyte communication mechanisms controlling C. elegans fertility. Dev Dyn. 2010;239(5):1265–81. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.22202 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ellis RE, Stanfield GM. The regulation of spermatogenesis and sperm function in nematodes. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2014;29:17–30. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2014.04.005 ; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.L'Hernault SW. Spermatogenesis. WormBook. 2006:1–14. doi: 10.1895/wormbook.1.85.1 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Smith JR, Stanfield GM. TRY-5 is a sperm-activating protease in Caenorhabditis elegans seminal fluid. PLoS Genet. 2011;7(11):e1002375 Epub 2011/11/30. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002375 ; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Frezal L, Felix MA. C. elegans outside the Petri dish. Elife. 2015;4 doi: 10.7554/eLife.05849 ; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Chang AJ, Chronis N, Karow DS, Marletta MA, Bargmann CI. A distributed chemosensory circuit for oxygen preference in C. elegans. PLoS Biol. 2006;4(9):e274 Epub 2006/08/15. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040274 ; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Gray JM, Karow DS, Lu H, Chang AJ, Chang JS, Ellis RE, et al. Oxygen sensation and social feeding mediated by a C. elegans guanylate cyclase homologue. Nature. 2004;430(6997):317–22. doi: 10.1038/nature02714 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Meisel JD, Kim DH. Behavioral avoidance of pathogenic bacteria by Caenorhabditis elegans. Trends Immunol. 2014;35(10):465–70. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2014.08.008 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Rogers C, Reale V, Kim K, Chatwin H, Li C, Evans P, et al. Inhibition of Caenorhabditis elegans social feeding by FMRFamide-related peptide activation of NPR-1. Nat Neurosci. 2003;6(11):1178–85. doi: 10.1038/nn1140 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Styer KL, Singh V, Macosko E, Steele SE, Bargmann CI, Aballay A. Innate immunity in Caenorhabditis elegans is regulated by neurons expressing NPR-1/GPCR. Science. 2008;322(5900):460–4. doi: 10.1126/science.1163673 ; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.de Bono M, Tobin DM, Davis MW, Avery L, Bargmann CI. Social feeding in Caenorhabditis elegans is induced by neurons that detect aversive stimuli. Nature. 2002;419(6910):899–903. Epub 2002/11/01. doi: 10.1038/nature01169 ; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Sterken MG, Snoek LB, Kammenga JE, Andersen EC. The laboratory domestication of Caenorhabditis elegans. Trends Genet. 2015;31(5):224–31. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2015.02.009 ; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.de Bono M, Bargmann CI. Natural variation in a neuropeptide Y receptor homolog modifies social behavior and food response in C. elegans. Cell. 1998;94(5):679–89. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Macosko EZ, Pokala N, Feinberg EH, Chalasani SH, Butcher RA, Clardy J, et al. A hub-and-spoke circuit drives pheromone attraction and social behaviour in C. elegans. Nature. 2009;458(7242):1171–5. doi: 10.1038/nature07886 ; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Bargmann CI. Chemosensation in C. elegans. WormBook. 2006:1–29. doi: 10.1895/wormbook.1.123.1 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Frokjaer-Jensen C, Davis MW, Hollopeter G, Taylor J, Harris TW, Nix P, et al. Targeted gene deletions in C. elegans using transposon excision. Nat Methods. 2010;7(6):451–3. Epub 2010/04/27. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1454 ; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Dickinson DJ, Ward JD, Reiner DJ, Goldstein B. Engineering the Caenorhabditis elegans genome using Cas9-triggered homologous recombination. Nat Methods. 2013;10(10):1028–34. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2641 ; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Bastiani C, Mendel J. Heterotrimeric G proteins in C. elegans. WormBook. 2006:1–25. Epub 2007/12/01. doi: 10.1895/wormbook.1.75.1 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.McKay SJ, Johnsen R, Khattra J, Asano J, Baillie DL, Chan S, et al. Gene expression profiling of cells, tissues, and developmental stages of the nematode C. elegans. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 2003;68:159–69. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Kaplan OI, Doroquez DB, Cevik S, Bowie RV, Clarke L, Sanders AA, et al. Endocytosis genes facilitate protein and membrane transport in C. elegans sensory cilia. Curr Biol. 2012;22(6):451–60. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.01.060 ; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Barton MK, Schedl TB, Kimble J. Gain-of-function mutations of fem-3, a sex-determination gene in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 1987;115(1):107–19. . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Beanan MJ, Strome S. Characterization of a germ-line proliferation mutation in C. elegans. Development. 1992;116(3):755–66. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Singson A, Mercer KB, L'Hernault SW. The C. elegans spe-9 gene encodes a sperm transmembrane protein that contains EGF-like repeats and is required for fertilization. Cell. 1998;93(1):71–9. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Browning H, Strome S. A sperm-supplied factor required for embryogenesis in C. elegans. Development. 1996;122(1):391–404. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Brear AG, Yoon J, Wojtyniak M, Sengupta P. Diverse cell type-specific mechanisms localize G protein-coupled receptors to Caenorhabditis elegans sensory cilia. Genetics. 2014;197(2):667–84. doi: 10.1534/genetics.114.161349 ; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Doi M, Iwasaki K. Regulation of retrograde signaling at neuromuscular junctions by the novel C2 domain protein AEX-1. Neuron. 2002;33(2):249–59. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Simonsen KT, Gallego SF, Faergeman NJ, Kallipolitis BH. Strength in numbers: "Omics" studies of C. elegans innate immunity. Virulence. 2012;3(6):477–84. doi: 10.4161/viru.21906 ; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Ma X, Zhu Y, Li C, Xue P, Zhao Y, Chen S, et al. Characterisation of Caenorhabditis elegans sperm transcriptome and proteome. BMC Genomics. 2014;15:168 doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-168 ; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Lemire B. Mitochondrial genetics. WormBook. 2005:1–10. doi: 10.1895/wormbook.1.25.1 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Tsang WY, Lemire BD. Stable heteroplasmy but differential inheritance of a large mitochondrial DNA deletion in nematodes. Biochem Cell Biol. 2002;80(5):645–54. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Liau WS, Gonzalez-Serricchio AS, Deshommes C, Chin K, LaMunyon CW. A persistent mitochondrial deletion reduces fitness and sperm performance in heteroplasmic populations of C. elegans. BMC Genet. 2007;8:8 doi: 10.1186/1471-2156-8-8 ; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Lin YF, Schulz AM, Pellegrino MW, Lu Y, Shaham S, Haynes CM. Maintenance and propagation of a deleterious mitochondrial genome by the mitochondrial unfolded protein response. Nature. 2016;533(7603):416–9. doi: 10.1038/nature17989 ; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Yang W, Hekimi S. Two modes of mitochondrial dysfunction lead independently to lifespan extension in Caenorhabditis elegans. Aging Cell. 2010;9(3):433–47. doi: 10.1111/j.1474-9726.2010.00571.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Xu S, Chisholm AD. C. elegans epidermal wounding induces a mitochondrial ROS burst that promotes wound repair. Dev Cell. 2014;31(1):48–60. Epub 2014/10/15. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2014.08.002 ; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Ren P, Lim CS, Johnsen R, Albert PS, Pilgrim D, Riddle DL. Control of C. elegans larval development by neuronal expression of a TGF-beta homolog. Science. 1996;274(5291):1389–91. Epub 1996/11/22. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Kubiak TM, Larsen MJ, Bowman JW, Geary TG, Lowery DE. FMRFamide-like peptides encoded on the flp-18 precursor gene activate two isoforms of the orphan Caenorhabditis elegans G-protein-coupled receptor Y58G8A.4 heterologously expressed in mammalian cells. Biopolymers. 2008;90(3):339–48. Epub 2007/09/20. doi: 10.1002/bip.20850 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Cheung BH, Arellano-Carbajal F, Rybicki I, de Bono M. Soluble guanylate cyclases act in neurons exposed to the body fluid to promote C. elegans aggregation behavior. Curr Biol. 2004;14(12):1105–11. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.06.027 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Weber KP, De S, Kozarewa I, Turner DJ, Babu MM, de Bono M. Whole genome sequencing highlights genetic changes associated with laboratory domestication of C. elegans. PLoS One. 2010;5(11):e13922 Epub 2010/11/19. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013922 ; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Greer ER, Perez CL, Van Gilst MR, Lee BH, Ashrafi K. Neural and molecular dissection of a C. elegans sensory circuit that regulates fat and feeding. Cell Metab 2008;8(2):118–31. Epub 2008/08/06. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2008.06.005 ; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Wong A, Boutis P, Hekimi S. Mutations in the clk-1 gene of Caenorhabditis elegans affect developmental and behavioral timing. Genetics. 1995;139(3):1247–59. . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Wei X, Potter CJ, Luo L, Shen K. Controlling gene expression with the Q repressible binary expression system in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nat Methods. 2012;9(4):391–5. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1929 ; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Potter CJ, Tasic B, Russler EV, Liang L, Luo L. The Q system: a repressible binary system for transgene expression, lineage tracing, and mosaic analysis. Cell. 2010;141(3):536–48. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.02.025 ; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Tourmente M, Villar-Moya P, Varea-Sanchez M, Luque-Larena JJ, Rial E, Roldan ER. Performance of Rodent Spermatozoa Over Time Is Enhanced by Increased ATP Concentrations: The Role of Sperm Competition. Biol Reprod. 2015;93(3):64 doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.114.127621 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Schnakenberg SL, Siegal ML, Bloch Qazi MC. Oh, the places they'll go: Female sperm storage and sperm precedence in Drosophila melanogaster. Spermatogenesis. 2012;2(3):224–35. doi: 10.4161/spmg.21655 ; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Kaupp UB, Kashikar ND, Weyand I. Mechanisms of sperm chemotaxis. Annu Rev Physiol. 2008;70:93–117. Epub 2007/11/09. doi: 10.1146/annurev.physiol.70.113006.100654 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Reddy KC, Andersen EC, Kruglyak L, Kim DH. A polymorphism in npr-1 is a behavioral determinant of pathogen susceptibility in C. elegans. Science. 2009;323(5912):382–4. doi: 10.1126/science.1166527 ; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Ma DK, Rothe M, Zheng S, Bhatla N, Pender CL, Menzel R, et al. Cytochrome P450 drives a HIF-regulated behavioral response to reoxygenation by C. elegans. Science. 2013;341(6145):554–8. doi: 10.1126/science.1235753 ; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Aitken RJ, De Iuliis GN, McLachlan RI. Biological and clinical significance of DNA damage in the male germ line. Int J Androl. 2009;32(1):46–56. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2605.2008.00943.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Schedl T, Kimble J. fog-2, a germ-line-specific sex determination gene required for hermaphrodite spermatogenesis in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 1988;119(1):43–61. . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Hodgkin J, Horvitz HR, Brenner S. Nondisjunction Mutants of the Nematode CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS. Genetics. 1979;91(1):67–94. ; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Miller MA, Nguyen VQ, Lee MH, Kosinski M, Schedl T, Caprioli RM, et al. A sperm cytoskeletal protein that signals oocyte meiotic maturation and ovulation. Science. 2001;291(5511):2144–7. doi: 10.1126/science.1057586 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Miller MA. Sperm and oocyte isolation methods for biochemical and proteomic analysis. Methods Mol Biol. 2006;351:193–201. doi: 10.1385/1-59745-151-7:193 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Friedland AE, Tzur YB, Esvelt KM, Colaiacovo MP, Church GM, Calarco JA. Heritable genome editing in C. elegans via a CRISPR-Cas9 system. Nat Methods. 2013;10(8):741–3. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2532 ; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Kim H, Ishidate T, Ghanta KS, Seth M, Conte D Jr., Shirayama M, et al. A co-CRISPR strategy for efficient genome editing in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 2014;197(4):1069–80. doi: 10.1534/genetics.114.166389 ; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.