Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2017 Jun 30;12(6):e0179986. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179986

A novel association between relaxin receptor polymorphism and hematopoietic stem cell yield after mobilization

Saeam Shin 1,2, Juwon Kim 3, Soo-Zin Kim-Wanner 4, Halvard Bönig 4,5,6, Sung Ran Cho 7, Sinyoung Kim 1, Jong Rak Choi 1, Kyung-A Lee 1,*
Editor: Louise Purton8
PMCID: PMC5493337  PMID: 28666004

Abstract

Mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) from the bone marrow to the peripheral blood is a complex mechanism that involves adhesive and chemotactic interactions of HSCs as well as their bone marrow microenvironment. In addition to a number of non-genetic factors, genetic susceptibilities also contribute to the mobilization outcome. Identification of genetic factors associated with HSC yield is important to better understand the mechanism behind HSC mobilization. In the present study, we enrolled 148 Korean participants (56 healthy donors and 92 patients) undergoing HSC mobilization for allogeneic or autologous HSC transplantation. Among a total of 53 polymorphisms in 33 candidate genes, one polymorphism (rs11264422) in relaxin/insulin-like family peptide receptor 4 (RXFP4) gene was significantly associated with a higher HSC yield after mobilization in Koreans. However, in a set of 101 Europeans, no association was found between circulating CD34+ cell counts and rs11264422 genotype. Therefore, we suggest that the ethnic differences in subjects’ genetic background may be related to HSC mobilization. In conclusion, the relaxin—relaxin receptor axis may play an important role in HSC mobilization. We believe that the results of the current study could provide new insights for therapies that use relaxin and HSC populations, as well as a better understanding of HSC regulation and mobilization at the molecular level.

Introduction

Hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) mobilization is a complex process that involves chemotactic factors, proteases, and adhesive molecules in bone marrow (BM) niches [13]. There is wide inter-individual variability in response to mobilization, and the outcome is hardly predictable despite several known demographic or clinical risk factors such as the following: age, sex, body mass index (BMI), ethnicity, diagnosis, and extent and duration of prior chemotherapy [48]. Inter-individual variation of HSC mobilization yield can be explained by a multifactorial model consisting of environmental and multiple genetic factors. Genetic contribution to mobilizing capacity is further supported by the fact that the second mobilization in the same donor typically yields similar results to those from the first mobilization [9,10].

Previous studies have reported genetic associations between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and HSC mobilization yield [1115]. Most of these SNPs are located in gene encoding molecules with known functional significance in the mobilization pathway, including C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 12 (CXCL12), vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM1), CD44 (CD44), and colony stimulating factor 3 receptor (CSF3R) [1115]. However, some of the results were not replicated in subsequent studies [11,16,17], and the responsible gene remains elusive.

Recent genome-wide association studies have shown that various hematologic traits of white blood cells (WBC), red blood cells, platelets, and CD34+ cells are highly heritable [18,19]. Previous studies have also indicated that each WBC subtype shares some associations which are probably attributable to shared process of differentiation and maintenance in BM and peripheral blood (PB) [18,20]. Therefore, we hypothesized that genetic factors associated with WBC count, neutrophil count, and circulating CD34+ cell count could also contribute to the regulation and migration of HSCs in BM niches and in PB.

The aim of this study was to identify genetic factors associated with HSC collection yield after mobilization in Korean population. We also attempted to determine whether our finding could be applied to other ethnic group of European ancestry.

Methods

Participants

A total of 148 Korean subjects, including 56 healthy donors for allogeneic HSC transplantation and 92 patients with hematologic disorders for autologous HSC transplantation, were prospectively recruited for this study. The European set was recruited to confirm the applicability of our findings, and consisted of 101 healthy donors of European ancestry from Germany. This study was approved by the institutional review board (IRB) of the Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine (IRB No. 4-2013-0145). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants, in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Mobilization and HSC collection

For healthy donors, standard mobilization protocol was used with G-CSF (filgrastim 10 μg/kg daily), and collection was initiated on the fifth day after G-CSF initiation. Mobilization for patients undergoing autologous HSC transplantation was performed using G-CSF only or chemotherapy followed by G-CSF. Apheresis started when the PB leukocyte count reached 3.0 x 109/L after leukocyte nadir, in the case of combination with chemotherapy. Peak circulating CD34+ cell count (/μL), collected just before apheresis, was assessed using a Stem-Kit (Beckman Coulter, Miami, FL, USA) for the Korean set and with a BD Stem Cell Enumeration kit (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) for the European set. The CD34+ cell content in the first apheresis product was enumerated in 122 participants in the Korean set, and two additional outcomes were evaluated: total CD34+ cell count per donor body weight (/kg) obtained from the first apheresis; and CD34+ cell count (/μL) from the first apheresis product.

Selection of target polymorphisms in candidate genes

To determine whether previously reported genetic associations with HSC yield might be applied to Koreans, we selected four common polymorphisms (rs1801157, rs1041163, rs13347, and rs3917924) in the following four genes: CXCL12, VCAM1, CD44, and CSF3R [1117]. One polymorphism (rs2680880) in CXCR4 was not included, as it was not found in East Asians (http://www.1000genomes.org/) [12]. To identify more candidate genes, we searched the literature for SNPs that are associated with WBC, neutrophil, or CD34+ cell counts [1928] (Fig 1). Among the 64 additional SNPs, 15 with East Asian minor allele frequency of less than 0.05 were removed. Candidate genes were adopted from the literature or selected based on the functional relatedness to mobilization mechanism, such as cytokines, chemokines, proteases, and adhesion molecules (http://www.uniprot.org/) [2,3]. In total, 53 SNPs were selected for genotyping (Table 1).

Fig 1. Flow diagram of target polymorphism selection.

Fig 1

The diagram indicates inclusion and exclusion criteria for selection of target polymorphism.

Table 1. List of 53 polymorphisms in 33 genes included in this study.

rs ID Chromosome Location (GRCh38.p2) Candidate gene Distance to gene Protein function
rs11121242 1p36.23 8846242 RERE 20 kb downstream Control of cell survival
rs6577536 1p36.23 8850051 RERE 23 kb downstream Control of cell survival
rs11590606 1p36.23 8857610 RERE 31 kb downstream Control of cell survival
rs10864368 1p36.23 8858254 RERE 32 kb downstream Control of cell survival
rs3917924 1p34.3 36480052 CSF3R Intron2 Cell adhesion and chemotaxis
rs1041163 1p21.2 100718269 VCAM1 1 kb upstream Cell adhesion and migration
rs6702883 1p21.1 104700458 intergenic
rs4311917 1p13.3 107183121 NTNG1 Intron2 Controlling axon growth
rs345275 1p13.3 107951181 VAV3 Intron1 Regulation of cell adhesion
rs2365669 1p13.2 111820023 KCND3 Intron2 Subunit of potassium channel
rs7523839 1p13.2 115630459 VANGL1 11 kb upstream Multicellular organism development
rs850610 1p13.1 116406090 ATP1A1-AS1 Exon 3 Non-coding RNA
rs10923929 1p12 119963373 NOTCH2 Intron11 Stem cell population maintenance
rs11240089 1q21.1 147588715 BCL2 Intron1 Cell migration
rs4657616 1q23.1 159001296 ACKR1 202 kb upstream Chemokine receptor
rs2518564 1q23.1 159092646 ACKR1 111 kb upstream Chemokine receptor
rs12075 1q23.1 159205564 ACKR1 Exon 2 Chemokine receptor
rs12740969 1q21.3 154514584 TDRD10 Intron4 Nucleotide binding
rs11264422 1q22 155938032 RXFP4 3 kb upstream Relaxin-3 receptor
rs1962508 1q23.3 161975629 DDR2 655 kb upstream Cell migration and remodeling of the extracellular matrix
rs2806424 1q23.3 162721669 DDR2 Intron4 Cell migration and remodeling of the extracellular matrix
rs6426893 1q23.3 165058105 intergenic
rs919679 1q24.1 166287925 intergenic
rs6734238 2q13 113083453 IL1F10 7 kb upstream Cytokine
rs10932765 2q35 218234761 ARPC2 Intron5 Cytoskeleton constituent
rs16850408 4q13.3 74067090 CXCL2 29 kb upstream Chemokine
rs546829 4q13.3 74090655 CXCL2 6 kb upstream Chemokine
rs9131 4q13.3 74097332 CXCL2 Exon 4 Chemokine
rs7667376 4q13.3 74102173 CXCL2 2 kb downstream Chemokine
rs1371799 4q13.3 74112120 CXCL2 12 kb downstream Chemokine
rs7686861 4q13.3 74132767 CXCL2 33 kb downstream Chemokine
rs2517524 6p21.33 31057936 HCG22 Intron3 Non-coding RNA
rs2853946 6p21.33 31279426 HLA-B 74 kb upstream Regulation of immune response
rs2844503 6p21.33 31474954 HLA-B 117 kb downstream Regulation of immune response
rs6936204 6p21.32 32249315 intergenic
rs5020946 6p21.32 32482312 BTNL2 73 kb downstream Regulation of T-cell proliferation
rs4895441 6q23.3 135105435 MYB 75 kb upstream Control of proliferation and differentiation of hematopoietic progenitor cells
rs12660713 6q23.3 135196858 MYB Intron9 Control of proliferation and differentiation of hematopoietic progenitor cells
rs976760 7p21.2 14234028 DGKB Intron22 Intracellular signal transduction
rs445 7q21.2 92779056 CDK6 Intron2 Hematopoietic stem cell differentiation and cell adhesion
rs2163950 8q24.21 129585339 CCDC26 Intron 1 Non-coding RNA
rs579459 9q34.2 133278724 ABO 3 kb downstream Blood group system
rs1801157 10q11.21 44372809 CXCL12 Exon 4 Chemokine
rs13347 11p13 35231725 CD44 Exon 18 Cell adhesion and migration
rs2183383 11p11.12 50279041 PTPRJ 2 Mb downstream Regulation of cell adhesion
rs17609240 17q21.1 39954436 GSDMA 8 kb upstream Pyroptosis mediator
rs3894194 17q21.1 39965740 GSDMA Exon3 Pyroptosis mediator
rs3859192 17q21.1 39972395 GSDMA Intron6 Pyroptosis mediator
rs4065321 17q21.1 39987295 PSMD3 Intron3 Regulatory subunit of the 26 proteasome
rs4794822 17q21.1 40000459 CSF3 14 kb upstream Cytokine that controls granulocyte production
rs8078723 17q21.1 40010626 CSF3 4 kb upstream Cytokine that controls granulocyte production
rs8065443 17q21.1 40052687 MED24 Intron3 Component of transcriptional coactivator complex
rs2072910 20p12.2 9384656 PLCB4 Intron13 Intracellular signal transduction

SNP genotyping

Genomic DNA was extracted from PB leukocytes using the QIAamp DNA Blood Mini Kit (Qiagen, Venlo, The Netherlands). The primer sequences for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification and sequencing were designed using Primer3 software [29]. PCR was performed on 100 ng of genomic DNA, and sequencing was carried out using the BrightDye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Kit (Nimagen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands) on ABI 3500 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The results were compared with reference sequences using Sequencher 5.1 software (Gene Codes Corp., Ann Arbor, MI, USA). Quality of data was assessed using PHRED score for each base call [30]. The threshold for PHRED score was 20, based on the manufacturer’s instructions. In case of result with inadequate quality, sequencing was repeated and all genotype of tested locus were determined (no missing genotype data).

Statistical analysis

Following the Kolmogorov—Smirnov normality test, natural log transformation was applied on continuous outcome variables with skewed distribution for analysis. The association between continuous variables (age and BMI) and mobilization outcomes (CD34+ cell count in PB, total CD34+ cells/kg, and CD34+ cells in a product) were analyzed using Pearson correlation. The association between categorical variables (sex, diagnosis, BM involvement of disease, chemotherapy regimen history, mobilization protocol, and SNP genotype), and mobilization outcomes were analyzed using an independent two-sample t-test (for two categories) and analysis of variance (for three categories). Three subgroups were established for the genotype of each polymorphism: homozygous for the major allele, heterozygous and homozygous for the minor allele. We also tested three genetic models (dominant, recessive, and additive) using biallelic marker coding. SNPs with a raw P < 0.05 in analysis with all three mobilization outcomes were included in multivariate linear regression analysis. Additional variables related to patient demographics or clinical history with P < 0.05 shown in univariate analysis were included in multivariate analysis. Finally, the following variables were included in multivariate analysis according to each mobilization outcome: 1) CD34+ cell count in PB: sex, diagnosis, chemotherapy regimen history, and rs11264422 (RXFP4) genotype; 2) total CD34+ cells/kg: sex and RXFP4 genotype; and 3) CD34+ cell count in a product: sex, BMI, diagnosis, and RXFP4 genotype. False discovery rate (FDR) controlling procedure was used to adjust for multiple testing according to the genetic model [31]. P values < 0.05 were considered significant, and P values < 0.2 after FDR adjustment were considered to have a tendency [32]. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS Statistics version 23.0.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). FDR adjusted P values were calculated using Microsoft Exel 2010 (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA).

Results

Patient characteristics

Patient characteristics are summarized in Table 2. The group consisted of individuals who were diagnosed with acute leukemia (n = 8), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (n = 50), multiple myeloma (n = 33), and sarcoma (n = 1). On the first day of apheresis, the median circulating CD34+ count was 44 cells/μL in the Korean set and 93 cells/μL in the European set (healthy donors only for the latter).

Table 2. Characteristics of the participants in this study.

n (%)/median (interquartile ranges)
Characteristics Korean set European set
No. 148 101
Age (yr) 46 (32–56) 32 (26–42)
Sex
 Female 63 (42.6) 26 (25.7)
 Male 85 (57.4) 75 (74.3)
Body-mass index (kg/m2) 24.4 (21.5–26.1) 24.5 (22.4–28.0)
Diagnosis
 Healthy donor 56 (37.8) 101 (100)
 Acute leukemia 8 (5.4) -
 Non-Hodgkin lymphoma 50 (33.8) -
 Multiple myeloma 33 (22.3) -
 Sarcoma 1 (0.7) -
BM involvement of disease
 Present 51 (34.5) -
 Absent 97 (65.5) -
Chemotherapy regimen history
 Multiple regimens (three or more) 9 (6.1) -
 One or two regimens 139 (93.9) -
Mobilization
 Chemotherapy and G-CSF 80 (54.1) -
 G-CSF only 68 (45.9) 101 (100)
CD34+ cell count (/μL) in PB 44 (22–84) 93 (67–116)
First apheresis product*
 CD34+ cell count (/μL) 1,418 (591–2,330) -
 CD34+ cell count/kg donor (×106) 3.54 (1.69–6.91) -

PB, peripheral blood

aCD34+ cell count in an apheresis product was measured in 122 participants.

Relaxin/insulin-like family peptide receptor 4

Of the 53 SNPs, only one polymorphism (rs11264422) made a significant difference in the three HSC mobilization outcomes of the Korean set (Table 3). The rs11264422 genotype, located 3 kb upstream of the relaxin/insulin-like family peptide receptor 4 (RXFP4) gene, was significantly associated with circulating CD34+ cells/μL (raw P = 0.03), total CD34+ cells/kg (raw P = 0.008), and product CD34+ cells/μL (raw P = 0.003) (Fig 2). Three patients (two with lymphoma and one with multiple myeloma) who were homozygous for a minor allele (AA genotype) showed remarkably higher mobilization outcomes compared to both the 25 patients who were heterozygous (TA genotype) and the 120 who were homozygous (TT genotype) for the major allele. Moreover, the presence of A allele (TA+AA genotypes) showed significant association with higher CD34+ cells/μL in a product (raw P = 0.02). Superior mobilizers (defined as > 200 circulating CD34+ cells/μL) had the highest frequency (66.7%) of the AA genotype, followed by TA (12.0%) and TT (5.8%) genotypes (Fig 3). In contrast, poor mobilizers (defined as < 20 circulating CD34+ cells/μL) had a higher frequency of the TT (25.0%) than TA (12.0%) genotype. However, for rs11264422 genotyping using the European set, the circulating CD34+ cell count did not differ between each genotype subgroup. SNP was at Hardy—Weinberg equilibrium in both Korean and European sets.

Table 3. Association of rs11264422 with mobilization outcomesa.

Genotype Korean set European set
CD34+ cells/μL in PB CD34+ cells/kg (×106) CD34+ cells/μL in a product CD34+ cells/μL in PB
n Mean ± SD Raw P FDR P n Mean ± SD Raw P FDR P n Mean ± SD Raw P FDR P n Mean ± SD P
TT 120 3.60 ± 1.28 0.03b* 0.808b 98 1.11 ± 1.33 0.008b* 0.424b 98 7.10 ± 1.39 0.003b* 0.159b*** 11 4.54 ± 0.31 0.5b
TA 25 3.85 ± 1.17 21 1.47 ± 1.25 21 7.58 ± 1.31 41 4.30 ± 0.68
AA 3 5.51 ± 0.51 3 3.44 ± 0.51 3 9.72 ± 0.45 49 4.41 ± 0.58
TT+TA 145 3.55 ± 1.41 0.01c* 0.5c 119 1.20 ± 1.35 0.008c* 0.4c 119 7.25 ± 1.42 0.003c* 0.15c*** 52 4.44 ± 0.54 0.3c
AA 3 5.51 ± 0.51 3 3.44 ± 0.51 3 9.72 ± 0.45 49 4.30 ± 0.63
TT 120 3.60 ± 1.28 0.1c 0.728c 98 1.11 ± 1.33 0.05c** 0.795c 98 7.10 ± 1.39 0.02c* 0.711c 11 4.50 ±0.31 0.4c
TA+AA 28 4.02 ± 1.23 24 1.71 ± 1.35 24 7.84 ± 1.43 90 4.36 ± 0.63
TT+AA 123 3.65 ± 1.33 0.5c 0.995c 101 1.23 ± 1.37 0.4c 0.938c 101 7.22 ± 1.44 0.3c 0.88c 60 4.41 ± 0.58 0.5c
TA 25 3.84 ± 1.17 21 1.47 ± 1.25 21 7.57 ± 1.31 41 4.35 ± 0.63

PB, peripheral blood; SD, standard deviation; FDR, adjusted P value using false discovery rate controlling procedure

aNatural log transformation was applied to mobilization outcomes due to skewed distribution.

bAnalysis of variance

Independent two-sample t-test

*P< 0.05

**P = 0.05

***P< 0.2 after FDR adjustment

Fig 2. Correlations between rs11264422 genotype and continuous outcomes.

Fig 2

There were significant associations between rs11264422 genotype and (A) circulating CD34+ cells/μL (raw P = 0.03), (B) total CD34+ cells/kg (raw P = 0.008), and (C) product CD34+ cells/μL (raw P = 0.003) in the Korean set (gray-colored bar). However, no statistically significant association was found between rs11264422 genotype and circulating CD34+ cells/μL in the European set (solid-lined bar). Mobilization outcomes were applied natural log transformation, due to the skewed distribution.

Fig 3. The rs11264422 genotype distribution of participants in the Korean set, classified by circulating CD34+ cell count.

Fig 3

Superior mobilizers (> 200 cells/μL) had 66.7%, 12.0%, and 5.8% frequency rates in AA, TA, and TT genotypes, respectively. Poor mobilizers (< 20 cells/μL) had 25.0% and 12.0% frequency rates in TT and TA genotypes, respectively.

Univariate and multivariate analyses of host factors and mobilization outcomes

In univariate analysis, the circulating CD34+ cell count after mobilization was associated with sex, diagnosis, history of multiple chemotherapy regimens, and RXFP4 genotype in the Korean population (Table 4). In the European set, only a low BMI showed significant correlation with a low circulating CD34+ cell count (P < 0.001). In the Korean set, the total CD34+ cell count/kg was associated with sex and RXFP4 genotype, while the CD34+ cell count in a product was associated with sex, BMI, diagnosis, and RXFP4 genotype.

Table 4. Factors associated with mobilization outcomes in the univariate analysisa.

Variables Korean set European set
CD34+ cells/μL in PB CD34+ cells/kg (×106) CD34+ cells/μL in a product CD34+ cells/μL in PB
r, mean ± SD P value r, mean ± SD P value r, mean ± SD P value r, mean ± SD P value
Age (yr) -0.064 0.4b -0.014 0.9b 0.096 0.3b 0.007 0.9b
Sex 0.001c* 0.002c* <0.001c* 0.06c
 Male 3.99 ± 1.20 1.87 ± 1.01 7.70 ± 1.42 4.47 ± 0.51
 Female 3.34 ± 1.19 1.34 ± 0.77 6.65 ± 1.19 4.15 ± 0.78
Body-mass index (kg/m2) 0.155 0.06b 0.112 0.2b 0.204 0.02b* 0.343 <0.001b*
Diagnosis <0.001d* 0.08d 0.01d* -
 Healthy donor 3.88 ± 0.57 1.74 ± 0.39 6.81 ± 0.58
 Acute leukemia 2.07 ± 1.04 0.81 ± 0.55 6.16 ± 1.27
 Non-Hodgkin lymphoma/sarcomae 3.73 ± 1.68 1.69 ± 1.22 7.61 ± 1.05
 Multiple myeloma 3.87 ± 0.96 1.67 ± 0.95 7.61 ± 1.05
BM involvement of disease 0.2c 0.4c 0.4c -
 Absent 3.80 ± 1.17 1.69 ± 0.94 7.16 ± 1.43
 Present 3.55 ± 1.35 1.56 ± 0.96 7.37 ± 1.40
Chemotherapy regimen history 0.04c* 0.09c 0.3c -
 One or two regimens 3.77 ± 1.22 1.68 ± 0.95 7.29 ± 1.41
 Multiple regimens (three or more) 2.89 ± 1.27 1.14 ± 0.85 6.72 ± 1.52
Mobilization 0.8c 0.9c 0.7c -
 G-CSF only 3.69 ± 1.28 1.64 ± 0.97 7.30 ± 1.45
 Chemotherapy and G-CSF 3.74 ± 1.20 1.64 ± 0.93 7.19 ± 1.40
RXFP4 genotype 0.03d* 0.008d* 0.003d* 0.5d
 TT 3.60 ± 1.28 1.11 ± 1.33 7.10 ± 1.39 4.54 ± 0.31
 TA 3.85 ± 1.17 1.47 ± 1.25 7.58 ± 1.31 4.30 ± 0.68
 AA 5.51 ± 0.51 3.44 ± 0.51 9.72 ± 0.45 4.41 ± 0.58

aNatural log transformation was applied to mobilization outcomes due to skewed distribution. Data were represented as correlation coefficient (r) or mean ± standard deviation.

bPearson correlation test

cIndependent two-sample t-test

dAnalysis of variance

e50 patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma and one with sarcoma were included.

*P < 0.05

Multivariate linear regression analysis revealed that female sex, diagnosis of acute leukemia, history of multiple chemotherapy regimens, and RXFP4 genotype (TT and TA) remained independently associated with lower circulating CD34+ cell count after mobilization in the Korean set (Table 5). Female sex and RXFP4 genotype (TT and TA) showed consistent significance when analyzed with other outcome variables, i.e., total CD34+ cell count/kg and CD34+ cell count in a product.

Table 5. Factors associated with log-transformed mobilization outcomes in the multivariate linear regression analysis in the Korean set.

Variables CD34+ cells/μL in PB CD34+ cells/kg (×106) CD34+ cells/μL in a product
β (95% CI) P value β (95% CI) P value β (95% CI) P value
Sex
 Male Reference Reference Reference
 Female -0.660 (-1.028, -0.292) 0.001* -0.630 (-1.018, -0.242) 0.002* -0.590 (-0.987, -0.193) 0.004*
Body-mass index (kg/m2) 0.025 (-0.031, 0.081) 0.4
Diagnosis
 Healthy donor Reference Reference
 Acute leukemia -1.722 (-2.545, -0.898) <0.001* -1.737 (-2.574, -0.901) <0.001*
 Non-Hodgkin lymphoma/sarcomaa -0.259 (-0.701, 0.183) 0.2 -0.368 (-0.803, 0.068) 0.09
 Multiple myeloma -0.057 (-0.551, 0.437) 0.8 -0.150 (-0.653, 0.353) 0.6
Chemotherapy regimen history
 Multiple regimens (three or more) Reference
 One or two regimens 0.877 (0.100, 1.654) 0.03*
RXFP4 genotype
 TT Reference Reference Reference
 TA 0.091 (-0.405, 0.588) 0.7 0.166 (-0.347, 0.678) 0.5 0.122 (-0.382, 0.626) 0.6
 AA 1.735 (0.446, 3.024) 0.009* 1.809 (0.452, 3.166) 0.009* 1.830 (0.526, 3.135) 0.006*

PB, peripheral blood; CI, confidence interval

a50 patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma and one with sarcoma were included.

*P < 0.05

Discussion

In this study, we found that rs11264422 genotype, located in the promoter flanking region of RXFP4, has a significant effect on HSC mobilization. The RXFP4 gene encodes relaxin-3 receptor 2, which is a receptor for relaxin-3 and is expressed in various tissues including BM [33]. Relaxin-3 is a member of the insulin/relaxin superfamily of peptide hormones [34]. Segal et al. revealed that the relaxin hormone mobilizes BM-derived CD34+ endothelial progenitor cells into circulation, and their effect is mediated by the relaxin receptor [35]. The role of relaxin and its receptor-mediated pathway in HSC mobilization, as well as their association with the inter-individual variation of mobilization yield, can be hypothesized based on such observation.

The FDR-adjusted P-values for rs11264422 were above the significance threshold (P = 0.05). However, we considered P < 0.2 after FDR adjustment as having a tendency for association. Given that the sample size was inadequate compared with the number of genes, we sought to find a possible exploratory factor. We determined three different mobilization outcomes and found consistent genes in all three. We then decided that the P-value of rs11264422 showed a meaningful trend, and wanted to suggest a further study. Therefore, we would like to conduct a confirmatory study using a larger number of patients.

The rs11264422 polymorphism has been associated with lower WBC counts in individuals of African, but not European, ancestry [28]. In our study, rs11264422 genotype was associated with HSC yield in Koreans but not in Europeans. Interestingly, the frequency of AA homozygote genotype is low in East Asians (1‒4% in Japanese and Chinese) and Africans (0.2%), but distinctly higher in Europeans (43%). Moreover, in a previous randomized controlled trial in Japan, a higher baseline WBC count was associated with a lower incidence of poor mobilization [36]. Therefore, we infer that the mechanism involved in HSC mobilization differs by ethnic groups, and rs11264422 genotype is associated with the HSC mobilization yield as well as the baseline WBC count in certain populations. Moreover, associations between the four polymorphisms in CXCL12, VCAM1, CD44, and CSF3R and mobilization outcome were not replicated in our study. Previous studies have already noted discrepancies in genetic associations, which were likely attributed to differences in ethnicity, diagnosis, number of study participants, and definition of outcome [1317]. In particular, most of the previous studies had targeted those of European ancestry, whereas our study is the first to target the East Asian population. Therefore, our results suggest that there are significant differences in molecular mechanisms underlying HSC mobilization between different ethnic groups. Our preliminary data warrant further validation with larger cohorts of various population subgroups.

The therapeutic effect of circulating CD34+ cells has been demonstrated in hematologic disorders and cardiovascular diseases [37,38]. In this context, the promotion of vasculogenesis is thought to be a mechanism for efficacy of CD34+ progenitor cells [19]. Notably, serelaxin, which is a recombinant human relaxin-2, has demonstrated significant treatment effects on acute heart failure in a recent clinical trial [39]. The potential mechanisms behind beneficial effects of serelaxin in acute heart failure include vasodilation, tissue healing from stimulation of angiogenesis and stem cell survival, and remodeling of the extracellular matrix [40]. Furthermore, a recent experimental study demonstrated that relaxin improves wound healing in diabetic mice [41]. In that study, the wound-healing effect of relaxin was disturbed by antibodies against vascular endothelial growth factor, CXCR4, and CXCR12 [41]. Our data support previous assumptions about the effects of relaxin on vasculogenic capacity and stem cell/progenitor cell regulation, and suggest a broader applicability of relaxin to other vascular disorders such as diabetes mellitus. In addition, our data also suggest that relaxin is a novel agent for the management of poor mobilizers.

Among host risk factors, female sex, history of multiple chemotherapy regimens, and diagnosis of acute leukemia remained independently associated with low circulating CD34+ cell counts in Koreans. Female sex [4,42], prior treatment history [1], and diagnosis of acute leukemia [43] have all been known to be independent risk factors for poor mobilization. The mechanism behind association of sex and better mobilization potential can be explained by the stem cell regulation effect of sex steroids [44]. The contribution of an underlying hematologic disease on HSC mobilization can be explained by disease-related reduction of HSC reservoir, or chemotherapy-induced toxic effects on BM [43]. In the European set, only BMI correlated with circulating CD34+ cell counts. The mechanism behind association between higher BMI and better mobilization potential has been attributed to the effect of adipose tissue-containing HSCs, or a simple dose effect of G-CSF [8].

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to indicate an association between relaxin receptor polymorphism and HSC yield after mobilization. A potential limitation of our study is that the discovered locus is located in the regulatory region of RXFP4, and not in the protein-coding region. Further investigation regarding the functional effect of relaxin-3, as well as its receptor axis on the mobilization process, are required.

In conclusion, we found a novel association between relaxin receptor polymorphism and HSC yield after mobilization in ethnic Koreans. Our findings suggest an important functional role of relaxin axis during response of BM HSCs to the mobilizing agent. Results of our study give valuable insight to a potential therapeutic target—the relaxin—relaxin receptor axis—for the management of poor mobilizers, and for the treatment of various vascular diseases.

Supporting information

S1 File. Table A.

Association of 53 polymorphisms with mobilization outcomes.

(XLSX)

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by a grant from the Korean Health Technology R&D Project, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Republic of Korea (A120030, http://www.htdream.kr/, KAL). The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.To LB, Levesque JP, Herbert KE. How I treat patients who mobilize hematopoietic stem cells poorly. Blood. 2011;118: 4530–4540. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-06-318220 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Papayannopoulou T. Current mechanistic scenarios in hematopoietic stem/progenitor cell mobilization. Blood. 2004;103: 1580–1585. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-05-1595 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Wilson A, Trumpp A. Bone-marrow haematopoietic-stem-cell niches. Nat Rev Immunol. 2006;6: 93–106. doi: 10.1038/nri1779 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Vasu S, Leitman SF, Tisdale JF, Hsieh MM, Childs RW, Barrett AJ, et al. Donor demographic and laboratory predictors of allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell mobilization in an ethnically diverse population. Blood. 2008;112: 2092–2100. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-03-143677 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ameen RM, Alshemmari SH, Alqallaf D. Factors associated with successful mobilization of progenitor hematopoietic stem cells among patients with lymphoid malignancies. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma. 2008;8: 106–110. doi: 10.3816/CLM.2008.n.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Cottler-Fox M, Lapidot T. Mobilizing the older patient with myeloma. Blood Rev. 2006;20: 43–50. doi: 10.1016/j.blre.2005.06.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Pavone V, Gaudio F, Console G, Vitolo U, Iacopino P, Guarini A, et al. Poor mobilization is an independent prognostic factor in patients with malignant lymphomas treated by peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2006;37: 719–724. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1705298 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Teipel R, Schetelig J, Kramer M, Schmidt H, Schmidt AH, Thiede C, et al. Prediction of hematopoietic stem cell yield after mobilization with granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor in healthy unrelated donors. Transfusion. 2015;55: 2855–2863. doi: 10.1111/trf.13239 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.De la Rubia J, Arbona C, Del Canizo C, Arrieta R, De Arriba F, Pascual MJ, et al. Second mobilization and collection of peripheral blood progenitor cells in healthy donors is associated with lower CD34(+) cell yields. J Hematother Stem Cell Res. 2002;11: 705–709. doi: 10.1089/15258160260194857 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Platzbecker U, Bornhauser M, Zimmer K, Lerche L, Rutt C, Ehninger G, et al. Second donation of granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor-mobilized peripheral blood progenitor cells: risk factors associated with a low yield of CD34+ cells. Transfusion. 2005;45: 11–15. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2005.04107.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Szmigielska-Kaplon A, Szemraj J, Hamara K, Robak M, Wolska A, Pluta A, et al. Polymorphism of CD44 influences the efficacy of CD34(+) cells mobilization in patients with hematological malignancies. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2014;20: 986–991. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2014.03.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Martin-Antonio B, Carmona M, Falantes J, Gil E, Baez A, Suarez M, et al. Impact of constitutional polymorphisms in VCAM1 and CD44 on CD34+ cell collection yield after administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor to healthy donors. Haematologica. 2011;96: 102–109. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2010.026401 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ben Nasr M, Reguaya Z, Berraies L, Maamar M, Ladeb S, Ben Othmen T, et al. Association of stromal cell-derived factor-1-3'A polymorphism to higher mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells CD34+ in Tunisian population. Transplant Proc. 2011;43: 635–638. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2011.01.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Benboubker L, Watier H, Carion A, Georget MT, Desbois I, Colombat P, et al. Association between the SDF1-3′ A allele and high levels of CD34+ progenitor cells mobilized into peripheral blood in humans. British journal of haematology. 2001;113: 247–250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bogunia-Kubik K, Gieryng A, Dlubek D, Lange A. The CXCL12-3'A allele is associated with a higher mobilization yield of CD34 progenitors to the peripheral blood of healthy donors for allogeneic transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2009;44: 273–278. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2009.30 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lenk J, Bornhauser M, Kramer M, Hölig K, Poppe-Thiede K, Schmidt H, et al. Sex and Body Mass Index but Not CXCL12 801 G/A Polymorphism Determine the Efficacy of Hematopoietic Cell Mobilization: A Study in Healthy Volunteer Donors. Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation. 2013;19: 1517–1521. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2013.07.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Schulz M, Karpova D, Spohn G, Damert A, Seifried E, Binder V, et al. Variant rs1801157 in the 3'UTR of SDF-1ss does not explain variability of healthy-donor G-CSF responsiveness. PLoS One. 2015;10: e0121859 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121859 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Okada Y, Kamatani Y. Common genetic factors for hematological traits in humans. J Hum Genet. 2012;57: 161–169. doi: 10.1038/jhg.2012.2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Cohen KS, Cheng S, Larson MG, Cupples LA, McCabe EL, Wang YA, et al. Circulating CD34+ progenitor cell frequency is associated with clinical and genetic factors. Blood. 2013. 2013/01/05. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-05-424846 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Okada Y, Hirota T, Kamatani Y, Takahashi A, Ohmiya H, Kumasaka N, et al. Identification of nine novel loci associated with white blood cell subtypes in a Japanese population. PLoS Genet. 2011;7: e1002067 doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002067 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Abecasis GR, Reiner AP, Lettre G, Nalls MA, Ganesh SK, Mathias R, et al. Genome-Wide Association Study of White Blood Cell Count in 16,388 African Americans: the Continental Origins and Genetic Epidemiology Network (COGENT). PLoS Genetics. 2011;7: e1002108 doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Reich D, Nalls MA, Kao WL, Akylbekova EL, Tandon A, Patterson N, et al. Reduced neutrophil count in people of African descent is due to a regulatory variant in the Duffy antigen receptor for chemokines gene. PLoS Genetics. 2009;5: e1000360 doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000360 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Soranzo N, Spector TD, Mangino M, Kühnel B, Rendon A, Teumer A, et al. A genome-wide meta-analysis identifies 22 loci associated with eight hematological parameters in the HaemGen consortium. Nat Genet. 2009;41: 1182–1190. doi: 10.1038/ng.467 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kamatani Y, Matsuda K, Okada Y, Kubo M, Hosono N, Daigo Y, et al. Genome-wide association study of hematological and biochemical traits in a Japanese population. Nat Genet. 2010;42: 210–215. doi: 10.1038/ng.531 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Okada Y, Kamatani Y, Takahashi A, Matsuda K, Hosono N, Ohmiya H, et al. Common variations in PSMD3–CSF3 and PLCB4 are associated with neutrophil count. Hum Mol Genet. 2010;19: 2079–2085. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddq080 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Nalls MA, Couper DJ, Tanaka T, van Rooij FJ, Chen MH, Smith AV, et al. Multiple loci are associated with white blood cell phenotypes. PLoS Genet. 2011;7: e1002113 doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kong M, Lee C. Genetic associations with C-reactive protein level and white blood cell count in the KARE study. Int J Immunogenet. 2013;40: 120–125. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-313X.2012.01141.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Nalls MA, Wilson JG, Patterson NJ, Tandon A, Zmuda JM, Huntsman S, et al. Admixture mapping of white cell count: genetic locus responsible for lower white blood cell count in the Health ABC and Jackson Heart studies. Am J Hum Genet. 2008;82: 81–87. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2007.09.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Untergasser A, Cutcutache I, Koressaar T, Ye J, Faircloth BC, Remm M, et al. Primer3—new capabilities and interfaces. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40: e115 doi: 10.1093/nar/gks596 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ewing B, Green P. Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. II. Error probabilities. Genome Res. 1998;8: 186–194. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the royal statistical society. Series B (Methodological). 1995: 289–300. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Lentner C, Diem K, Seldrup J. Geigy scientific tables Volume 2: introduction to statistics, statistical tables, mathematical formulae. Basle: Ciba-Geigy; 1982. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Boels K, Schaller HC. Identification and characterisation of GPR100 as a novel human G-protein-coupled bradykinin receptor. Br J Pharmacol. 2003;140: 932–938. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0705521 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Rosengren KJ, Lin F, Bathgate RA, Tregear GW, Daly NL, Wade JD, et al. Solution structure and novel insights into the determinants of the receptor specificity of human relaxin-3. J Biol Chem. 2006;281: 5845–5851. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M511210200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Segal MS, Sautina L, Li S, Diao Y, Agoulnik AI, Kielczewski J, et al. Relaxin increases human endothelial progenitor cell NO and migration and vasculogenesis in mice. Blood. 2012;119: 629–636. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-04-346007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Komeno Y, Kanda Y, Hamaki T, Mitani K, Iijima K, Ueyama J, et al. A randomized controlled trial to compare once- versus twice-daily filgrastim for mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells from healthy donors. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2006;12: 408–413. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2005.11.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Losordo DW, Henry TD, Davidson C, Sup Lee J, Costa MA, Bass T, et al. Intramyocardial, autologous CD34+ cell therapy for refractory angina. Circ Res. 2011;109: 428–436. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.111.245993 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Gupta R, Losordo DW. Cell therapy for critical limb ischemia: moving forward one step at a time. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;4: 2–5. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.110.960716 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Teerlink JR, Cotter G, Davison BA, Felker GM, Filippatos G, Greenberg BH, et al. Serelaxin, recombinant human relaxin-2, for treatment of acute heart failure (RELAX-AHF): a randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2013;381: 29–39. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61855-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Tietjens J, Teerlink JR. Serelaxin and acute heart failure. Heart. 2016;102: 95–99. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2014-306786 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Bitto A, Irrera N, Minutoli L, Calo M, Lo Cascio P, Caccia P, et al. Relaxin improves multiple markers of wound healing and ameliorates the disturbed healing pattern of genetically diabetic mice. Clin Sci (Lond). 2013;125: 575–585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 42.Wang TF, Wen SH, Chen RL, Lu CJ, Zheng YJ, Yang SH, et al. Factors associated with peripheral blood stem cell yield in volunteer donors mobilized with granulocyte colony-stimulating factors: the impact of donor characteristics and procedural settings. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2008;14: 1305–1311. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2008.09.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Koenigsmann M, Jentsch-Ullrich K, Mohren M, Becker E, Heim M, Franke A. The role of diagnosis in patients failing peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization. Transfusion. 2004;44: 777–784. doi: 10.1111/j.0041-1132.2004.03321.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Wang X, Mamillapalli R, Mutlu L, Du H, Taylor HS. Chemoattraction of bone marrow-derived stem cells towards human endometrial stromal cells is mediated by estradiol regulated CXCL12 and CXCR4 expression. Stem cell research. 2015;15: 14–22. doi: 10.1016/j.scr.2015.04.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

S1 File. Table A.

Association of 53 polymorphisms with mobilization outcomes.

(XLSX)

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.


Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES