Abstract
Long-distance migrants are particularly recognized for the distances covered on migration, yet little is known about the distances they cover during the rest of the year. GPS-tracks of 29 Montagu's harriers from breeding areas in France, The Netherlands and Denmark showed that harriers fly between 35 653 and 88 049 km yr−1, of which on average only 28.5% is on migration. Mean daily distances during migration were 296 km d−1 in autumn and 252 km d−1 in spring. Surprisingly, males' daily distances during breeding (217 km d−1) were close to those during migration, whereas breeding females moved significantly less (101 km d−1) than males. In terms of flight distance, the breeding season seemed nearly as demanding as migration periods for males. During the six winter months, both sexes moved less (114 and 128 km d−1 for females and males, respectively) than during migration. Harriers therefore covered shorter daily distances during winter which might allow birds to compensate for the more demanding phases of migration and breeding.
Keywords: total annual distance, long-distance migration, annual routine, bird of prey
1. Background
Migratory lifestyles are considered to have evolved under the premise that benefits of breeding in high-quality seasonal habitats more than outweigh the costs associated with making migratory journeys [1–3]. However, costs and benefits of migration remain poorly understood, partly because we have little knowledge of the relative costs of migration compared with other phases of the annual cycle [4–6]. It has been argued that migration is particularly costly since travel distances are relatively large [5,6], yet most birds also move substantial distances within the breeding and wintering seasons to gather food for themselves and their young. Thus, movements during stationary periods may contribute considerably to the total annual distance covered by birds. How the distance covered during stationary periods scales to migration distance is however largely unknown.
Montagu's harriers (Circus pygargus) are long-distance migratory raptors with a southwest-Palaearctic breeding and Afrotropical/Indomalayan wintering distribution [7]. Migration distance is shorter for more southerly breeding populations, whereas distances travelled in winter and during breeding might depend on habitat quality and food availability [8,9]. Montagu's harriers forage on the wing, and therefore might cover long distances also during stationary periods [10].
Here we aim at comparing the daily and total flight distances as proxies of energy expenditure during the main phases of the annual life cycle for both sexes of this long-distance migrant, replicated for three breeding populations, using 40 complete annual cycles of 29 Montagu's harriers followed by GPS-trackers.
2. Material and methods
(a). GPS-tracking data
We collected data for 40 complete annual cycles (from 1 July until 30 June the following year) of 9 female and 20 male Montagu's harriers tracked by means of UvA-BiTS GPS-trackers (www.uva-bits.nl, [11]) between 2009 and 2016. Seven individuals were tracked during 2 and two individuals during 3 years. Birds originated from breeding areas in Denmark (N = 3), The Netherlands (18) and France (8). GPS-trackers were mounted using a Teflon ribbon harness and programmed to collect GPS-positions at intervals of 5 min (N = 7 tracks), 10 min (12), 15 min (16), or 30 min (5) during daytime and a maximum of once per hour at night during migration and winter. During breeding, higher frequencies were obtained (most common interval was 5 min, but additional bursts of high-resolution data (3 s) were collected) but tracks were subsampled to the most common interval for the whole year. Data were checked for outliers visually on a map and points for which instantaneous or trajectory speed was higher than 30 m s−1 were deleted (453 fixes deleted, 1 134 664 fixes remained for analyses). Using a map of the recorded positions, daily tracks were assigned annual cycle phases (breeding, autumn migration, wintering, spring migration; figure 1). Pre- and post-migratory movements [12] were assigned to the nearest stationary period (pre-autumn (N = 8) and post-spring (N = 4) to breeding, post-autumn (N = 16) to winter). Daily distance was calculated by adding the distances between consecutive positions using function distMeeus from R package geosphere v. 1.5–5 [13]. Cumulative distance for each annual cycle phase was the sum of all daily distances within the phase and total annual distance was the sum of all daily distances within the whole year.
(b). Interval bias correction
Adding straight-line distances between GPS-positions underestimates true distance travelled depending on sampling interval and tortuosity of the movement path [14,15]. To correct for this effect, we subsampled high-resolution tracks (1200 fixes per hour) to intervals of 600, 300, 150, 75, 37.5, 18.75, 12, 6, 4, 3 and 2 fixes per hour (for an example see electronic supplementary material, figure S1). High-resolution data were regularly collected during breeding, but rarely during migration and winter owing to limited memory storage. In total, we accumulated 16.5 h for autumn migration, 11.5 h for spring migration, 11 h for winter and 14 h for breeding from tracks of Dutch male Montagu's harriers. By recalculating straight-line distances between GPS-positions for each subsampled dataset we calculated proportional accuracy (ratio of apparent to true distance travelled) using the original 1200 fixes per hour distance as reference (electronic supplementary material, figure S2). Daily distance was then corrected according to sampling interval of the track and annual cycle phase by multiplying with a correction factor (mean (range) breeding: 4.08 (2.73–7.79), autumn migration: 1.32 (1.24–1.36), winter: 3.30 (2.56–3.99), spring migration: 1.35 (1.27–1.43)). Correction factors are higher during stationary periods owing to more tortuous movements compared with directed flights during migration (cf. electronic supplementary material, figure S1). This correction might overestimate distances for females during breeding (incubation) and for birds moving between sites in winter or on stopover days.
(c). Statistical analyses
In order to test for differences between the sexes and populations regarding total annual distance, daily distance, and cumulative distance, we used linear mixed models (LMMs) with function lme from package nlme v. 3.1–127 [16] in R v. 3.3.0 [17]. In all models we included individual as random effect and population and sex as fixed effects. In the annual cycle phase-specific estimates we also included phase and the interaction terms phase : sex and phase : population as fixed effects. This resulted from comparing models with all possible combinations of interaction terms using the Akaike information criterion (AIC). Multi-comparison post-hoc tests were performed to evaluate differences between populations and annual cycle periods using R-function testInteractions from package phia v. 0.2–1 [18]. Estimates were calculated using R-function allEffects from package effects v. 3.1–2 [19].
3. Results and discussion
Montagu's harriers travelled on average 57 841 km (range 35 653–88 049 km) per year. Males travelled about 20% more than females (table 1a, figure 1; mean values: males 61 071 km, females 50 305 km), mainly because males covered longer daily distances during the breeding season compared with females (217 and 101 km day−1, respectively; table 1b, figure 2; cf. electronic supplementary material, figure S3 for individual time-series). This difference results from males provisioning the incubating female and both chicks and female during the first weeks after hatching [10]. Interestingly, despite female Montagu's harriers being substantially larger (370 versus 260 g), and therefore needing more food, we found no significant difference in winter flight distance (table 1b, figure 2; mean values: males 114 km d−1, females 128 km d−1). This might either indicate that food availability in general is not limiting or hint towards differential prey choice of the sexes during winter.
Table 1.
variable | edf | F-value | p-value |
---|---|---|---|
(a) total annual distance (km) (LMM, figure 1, estimates electronic supplementary material table S1) | |||
intercept | 25 | 966.94 | <0.001 |
sex | 25 | 6.46 | 0.02 |
population | 25 | 3.84 | 0.04 |
(b) mean daily distance (km) (LMM, figure 2a, estimates electronic supplementary material table S1) | |||
intercept | 119 | 1337.3 | <0.001 |
phase | 119 | 71.85 | <0.001 |
sex | 25 | 2.71 | 0.11 |
population | 25 | 2.4 | 0.11 |
phase × sex | 119 | 10.55 | <0.001 |
phase × population | 119 | 2.56 | 0.02 |
(c) cumulative distance (km) (LMM, figure 2c, estimates electronic supplementary material table S1) | |||
intercept | 119 | 894.16 | <0.001 |
phase | 119 | 112.79 | <0.001 |
sex | 25 | 6.13 | 0.02 |
population | 25 | 3.39 | 0.05 |
phase × sex | 119 | 18.08 | <0.001 |
phase × population | 119 | 2.67 | 0.02 |
French birds travelled less than Dutch and Danish birds (table 1a, figure 1; post-hoc test in electronic supplementary material, table S2a), mainly because French males flew less during breeding (table 1b, figure 2; mean values: F 92, NL 211, DK 217 km day−1) and not due to their shorter migration routes. It remains to be investigated whether this is caused by varying habitat quality and food availability.
Whereas 17% of the year was allocated to migration, birds covered 28.5% of their annual distance during this period (figures 1 and 2; females 31%, males 26%). Migration is often seen as an exceptional investment, but interestingly, males reached nearly similar daily distances during breeding as during migration. When comparing these daily distances to seasonal variation in mortality rates derived from satellite telemetry [5], it is striking that daily mortality rates during breeding (0.0012) are considerably lower than during autumn (0.0023) or spring migration (0.0052). Therefore, high mortality rates during migration are unlikely to be related to endurance of long-distance flight per se. Instead, it was suggested that high mortality rates during migration were related to unfavourable conditions encountered during migration and, possibly, to carry-over effects of demanding breeding seasons [5]. During the six winter months, Montagu's harriers fly relatively short daily distances and mortality is at its lowest (0.0006 [5]). Studies on other migratory species confirm that the wintering period seems to be the least demanding as survival rates are comparatively high [20,21]. Still, deteriorating environmental conditions in the course of the Sahelian winter force harriers to increase foraging time, and thereby daily distance travelled, and cause delays in spring departure for individuals wintering at the driest sites [8].
How general is the pattern of long-distance migrants flying daily distances during migration nearly similar to those during other annual cycle periods? We consider it likely that species hunting on the wing, like swallows, swifts, seabirds and many raptors, may cover similar distances during stationary and migratory periods, whereas for birds foraging on the ground or in the foliage, migration may indeed be outstanding in terms of daily flight distances. It is important to mention that recording interval strongly affects estimated distance and thus high-frequency tracks are required [15,22]. Earlier reports on daily travel distances of Montagu's harriers using satellite tracking data (autumn 175 km d−1, spring 166 km d−1 [9]) or lower resolution GPS-tracking data (autumn 205 km d−1, spring 182 km d−1 [23]) were indeed 28–35% lower than our corrected calculations using high-resolution tracks (autumn 296 km d−1, spring 252 km d−1).
To place migration into a life-history perspective, we consider it essential to compare the investment with that in other life cycle phases, as performed here for harriers using distance as a proxy for energy expenditure. Our main findings show that daily distances of breeding males are almost comparable to daily distances flown during migration, but that winter is less demanding. However, we need to investigate at what cost this comes, and whether effects carry over to survival, reproductive success and even population dynamics. This might become more important with further intensification of agricultural landscapes making breeding even more demanding owing to decreasing habitat quality and food availability.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
Without Ben J. Koks, who set up and coordinated the research in The Netherlands, this work would have been impossible. Thanks to Jean-Luc Bourrioux for asking inquisitive questions! We thank M. Postma, and C. Trierweiler (NL), M. Clausen (DK), S. Augiron, V. Rocheteau, S. Peirera-Dias, O. Lamy, B. Arroyo and F. Mougeot (F) and many more for fieldwork. Thanks to all farmers for good collaboration allowing us to protect and investigate harriers on their land. UvA-BiTS tracking studies are facilitated by infrastructures for eScience, developed with support of NLeSC (www.esciencecenter.nl) and LifeWatch, carried out on the Dutch national e-infrastructure with support of the SURF Foundation. We thank W. Cresswell, H. Mallion, S. Stokes and three anonymous referees for valuable comments on earlier drafts of this manuscript.
Ethics
Tracking was approved by local ethical committees: University of Groningen, The Netherlands (permits 5869B and 6429B), the Natural History Museum of Denmark, and CRBPO Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle for France (permit 1308).
Data accessibility
Data are available from the Dryad Digital Repository: doi:10.5061/dryad.84jk0 [24].
Authors' contributions
Fieldwork: A.E.S., R.H.G.K., I.H.S., A.V. Data-analysis and processing: A.E.S., W.B., C.B. Local project coordination: V.B., H.H. Drafting manuscript: A.E.S., C.B. All authors helped edit and revise the manuscript, gave final approval for publication and agreed to be held accountable for the content therein.
Competing interests
We have no competing interests.
Funding
A.E.S.: Dutch Montagu's Harrier Foundation, Prins Bernhard Cultuurfonds; V.B., A.V.: LISEA foundation and CNRS; H.H., I.H.S.: Villum Fonden (Fokuseret Fugleforvaltning) and Danish Nature Agency (Vildtstribeprojektet; NST-304-00068).
References
- 1.Alerstam T. 1990. Bird migration. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Dingle H. 1980. Ecology and evolution of migration. In Animal migration, orientation and navigation (ed. Gauthreaux SA.), pp. 54–63. New York, NY: Academic Press. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Newton I. 2008. The migration ecology of birds, 1st edn Cambridge, UK: Elsevier. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Buehler DM, Piersma T. 2008. Travelling on a budget: predictions and ecological evidence for bottlenecks in the annual cycle of long-distance migrants. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B. 363, 247–266. ( 10.1098/rstb.2007.2138) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Klaassen RHG, Hake M, Strandberg R, Koks BJ, Trierweiler C, Exo K-M, Bairlein F, Alerstam T. 2014. When and where does mortality occur in migratory birds? Direct evidence from long-term satellite tracking of raptors. J. Anim. Ecol. 83, 176–184. ( 10.1111/1365-2656.12135) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lok T, Overdijk O, Piersma T. 2015. The cost of migration: spoonbills suffer higher mortality during trans-Saharan spring migrations only. Biol. Lett. 11, 20140944 ( 10.1098/rsbl.2014.0944) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ferguson-Lees J, Christie DA. 2001. Raptors of the world. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin Company. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Schlaich AE, Klaassen RHG, Bouten W, Bretagnolle V, Koks BJ, Villers A, Both C. 2016. How individual Montagu's harriers cope with Moreau's Paradox during the Sahelian winter. J. Anim. Ecol. 85, 1491–1501. ( 10.1111/1365-2656.12583) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Trierweiler C, Klaassen RHG, Drent RH, Exo KM, Komdeur J, Bairlein F, Koks BJ. 2014. Migratory connectivity and population-specific migration routes in a long-distance migratory bird. Proc. R. Soc. B 281, 20132897 ( 10.1098/rspb.2013.2897) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Clarke R. 1996. Montagu's harrier. Chelmsford, UK: Arlequin Press. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Bouten W, Baaij E, Shamoun-Baranes J, Camphuysen KJ. 2013. A flexible GPS tracking system for studying bird behaviour at multiple scales. J. Ornithol. 154, 571–580. ( 10.1007/s10336-012-0908-1) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Strandberg R, Klaassen RHG, Hake M, Olofsson P, Thorup K, Alerstam T. 2008. Complex timing of Marsh harrier Circus aeruginosus migration due to pre- and post-migratory movements. Ardea 96, 159–171. ( 10.5253/078.096.0202) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hijmans RJ.2015. geosphere: Spherical trigonometry. R package version 1.5-5. See https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=geosphere .
- 14.Pépin D, Adrados C, Mann C, Janeau G. 2004. Assessing real daily distance traveled by ungulates using differential GPS locations. J. Mammal. 85, 774–780. ( 10.1644/ber-022) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.JM Rowcliffe, Carbone C, Kays R, Kranstauber B, Jansen PA. 2012. Bias in estimating animal travel distance: the effect of sampling frequency. Methods Ecol. Evol. 3, 653–662. ( 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2012.00197.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D, R Core Team 2016. nlme: Linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1-127. See http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme.
- 17.R Core Team. 2016. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; See https://www.R-project.org/. [Google Scholar]
- 18.De Rosario-Martinez H. 2015. phia: Post-hoc interaction analysis. R package version 0.2-1. See http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=phia.
- 19.Fox J. 2003. Effect displays in R for generalised linear models. J. Stat. Softw. 8, 27 ( 10.18637/jss.v008.i15) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Blackburn E, Cresswell W. 2016. High within-winter and annual survival rates in a declining Afro-Palaearctic migratory bird suggest that wintering conditions do not limit populations. Ibis 158, 92–105. ( 10.1111/ibi.12319) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Sillett TS, Holmes RT. 2002. Variation in survivorship of a migratory songbird throughout its annual cycle. J. Anim. Ecol. 71, 296–308. ( 10.1046/j.1365-2656.2002.00599.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Dewhirst OP, Evans HK, Roskilly K, Harvey RJ, Hubel TY, Wilson AM. 2016. Improving the accuracy of estimates of animal path and travel distance using GPS drift-corrected dead reckoning. Ecol. Evol. 6, 6210–6222. ( 10.1002/ece3.2359) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Vansteelant WMG, Bouten W, Klaassen RHG, Koks BJ, Schlaich AE, van Diermen J, van Loon EE, Shamoun-Baranes J. 2015. Regional and seasonal flight speeds of soaring migrants and the role of weather conditions at hourly and daily scales. J. Avian Biol. 46, 25–39. ( 10.1111/jav.00457) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Schlaich AE, Bouten W, Bretagnolle V, Heldbjerg H, Klaassen RHG, Sørensen IH, Villers A, Both C. 2017. Data from: A circannual perspective on daily and total flight distances in a long-distance migratory raptor, the Montagu's harrier, Circus pygargus. Dryad Digital Repository. ( 10.5061/dryad.84jk0) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Citations
- Schlaich AE, Bouten W, Bretagnolle V, Heldbjerg H, Klaassen RHG, Sørensen IH, Villers A, Both C. 2017. Data from: A circannual perspective on daily and total flight distances in a long-distance migratory raptor, the Montagu's harrier, Circus pygargus. Dryad Digital Repository. ( 10.5061/dryad.84jk0) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Data are available from the Dryad Digital Repository: doi:10.5061/dryad.84jk0 [24].