Abstract
Post-translational modification pathways such as SUMOylation are integral to all cellular processes and tissue homeostasis. We investigated the possible involvement of SUMOylation in the epithelial signalling in Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), the two major forms of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Initially in a murine model of IBD, induced by dextran–sulfate–sodium (DSS mice), we observed inflammation accompanied by a lowering of global SUMOylation of colonic epithelium. The observed SUMOylation alteration was due to a decrease in the sole SUMO E2 enzyme (Ubc9). Mass-spectrometric analysis revealed the existence of a distinct SUMOylome (SUMO-conjugated proteome) in DSS mice with alteration of key cellular regulators, including master kinase Akt1. Knocking-down of Ubc9 in epithelial cells resulted in dramatic activation of inflammatory gene expression, a phenomenon that acted via reduction in Akt1 and its SUMOylated form. Importantly, a strong decrease in Ubc9 and Akt1 was also seen in endoscopic biopsy samples (N = 66) of human CD and UC patients. Furthermore, patients with maximum disease indices were always accompanied by severely lowered Ubc9 or SUMOylated-Akt1. Mucosal tissues with severely compromised Ubc9 function displayed higher levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines and compromised wound-healing markers. Thus, our results reveal an important and previously undescribed role for the SUMOylation pathway involving Ubc9 and Akt1 in modulation of epithelial inflammatory signalling in IBD.
Keywords: colitis, inflammation, post-translational modification, SUMOylation, epithelial signalling
1. Introduction
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), which includes ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD), is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the intestine characterized by phases of remission and relapse. UC affects primarily the colon in a contiguous fashion and is characterized by superficial inflammation, whereas CD can affect any part of the intestine and is characterized by transmural inflammation. Genetic predisposition, dysbiosis, environmental factors and aberrant immune responses are key factors in the pathogenesis of IBD. Genome-wide association studies performed in IBD patients have identified 163 genes associated with the pathogenesis of IBD with about a quarter of them being shared between CD and UC [1,2].
Mucosal surfaces involve constant crosstalk between the epithelium, commensal microflora and the local immune cells. Owing to its complexity, even the slightest perturbations can potentially tilt the fine balance, and may result in inflammation and disease. The epithelial cells that are not just a physical barrier contribute a lot in the multi-directional interaction. They regulate the colonization and penetration of luminal microbe in many different ways [3]. The epithelium is also engaged in transducing the information about microbial invasion to underlying lamina propria by secreting a variety of cytokines [4]. Excessive activation of innate and adaptive immune components leads to inflammatory response and tissue destruction in IBD. CD is characterized by a Th1/Th17 phenotype, while UC has been recently recognized as Th2/Th17 disease. At the molecular level, a balance between the anti-inflammatory and pro-inflammatory signals is crucial. During disease, the molecular events that lead to a tilt in the balance are not fully understood. Post-translational modifications (PTMs) can rapidly and reversibly alter functional relevance of the proteome without the requirement of de novo synthesis of large sets of proteins. Understandably, PTM mechanisms including phosphorylation, acetylation and ubiquitination have been known to play a crucial role in IBD [5]. PTM by small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO) and its role in IBD has not been investigated. Our study focuses on understanding the importance of SUMO conjugation (or SUMOylation) during IBD, specifically in the context of epithelium.
SUMOylation is highly conserved and is central to the regulation of various cellular processes. Three SUMO paralogues (SUMO1, SUMO2 and SUMO3) are present in mammals [6]. The addition of SUMO to the target substrate requires sequential enzymatic action of E1 enzyme (SAE1/SAE2 heterodimer), E2 enzyme (UbC9) and one of several E3 ligases that act on specific targets. SUMOylation has been shown to participate in several fundamental cellular processes, including replication, transcription and genome maintenance [7]. Gut pathogens have been shown to target the host SUMOylation machinery and alter the SUMOylation level of host protein(s) [8,9]. Several regulators of the inflammatory cascade have been previously demonstrated to be dependent on SUMOylation for their proper function [7–9]. The important molecule among these involves RelA, a component of the master regulator nuclear factor κB (NFκB) and its repressor, IκBα [10]. In this work, using multiple systems ranging from cell culture model to clinical patient samples, we demonstrate that SUMOylation status of epithelial cells critically modulates the activities of master regulators including the serine–threonine kinase Akt1, which in turn regulate the severity of IBD.
2. Material and methods
All chemical unless otherwise specified were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich, USA.
2.1. Animal strains
Female C57BL/6 mice aged six to eight weeks were used for the study and kept under controlled temperature. Experiments were carried out in the Small Animal Facility of the NII (National Institute of Immunology). The NII Institutional Animal Ethics Committee approved the study (approval no. IAEC#331/14).
2.2. Induction of colitis
Experimental colitis was induced by adding dextran–sulfate–sodium (DSS; 40 kDa, Sigma, USA) to the autoclaved drinking water at 2.5% concentration (w/v). Animals were monitored daily for their stress and rectal bleeding.
2.3. Haematoxylin and eosin staining and immunohistochemistry
Proximal colon sections were fixed in 10% formalin buffer overnight and embedded in paraffin. Five micrometre thick sections were cut onto glass slides and processed for haematoxylin (Sigma) and eosin (Sigma) staining. The slides were dried and mounted using DPX mountant (Sigma) and images were taken using a Nikon (NY, USA) inverted fluorescence microscope. For immunohistochemistry (IHC), tissue sections were washed using 1× PBS three times (5 min each). Further, the endogenous peroxidase activity was quenched by treating the tissue with 3% H2O2 for 20 min. The tissue sample was again washed using 1× PBS twice (5 min each), then blocked with 5% goat serum at room temperature for 1 h. The sections were incubated with anti-Ubc9 (1 : 200; Abcam, USA) prepared in 5% goat serum overnight in a moist chamber. Sections were washed with 1× PBS five times for 5 min each and incubated with HRP-conjugated secondary antibody (1 : 200) (Invitrogen, USA) for 2 h prepared in 5% goat serum at room temperature in a moist chamber. The tissues were washed three times using 1× PBS, DAB substrate (Sigma, USA) was added and the reaction was stopped by keeping the slides under running tap water. The slides were counterstained using haematoxylin for 10 s and then washed with running milliQ water. The slides were visualized on a compound microscope.
2.4. Mouse primary epithelial cells
Proximal and caecal parts of the colon were isolated and cut longitudinally using sterile scissors. The opened colon was washed with ice-cold PBS containing the antibiotics gentamicin 50 µg ml−1 (Sigma) and penicillin–streptomycin 100 U ml−1 (Gibco, USA) for 10 min inside the laminar hood. Mucus from the surface was removed gently using a cell scraper with soft rubber. After the mucus removal, cells were treated with 30 mM EDTA for 30 min. Cells were washed three times in DPBS solution and seeded on six-well culture plates coated with collagen. Cells were grown in Dulbecco modified Eagle medium (DMEM) media with added 2.5% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 10% insulin (Sigma) for 72 h in a BOD incubator. Cells were treated with AKT1 inhibitor (Sigma), S-adenosyl methionine (SAM) (Biovision, USA) and listeriolysin (LLO) (Sigma). For primary mouse epithelial cells, SAM 2 µM (24 h treatment) and LLO 6 nM (1 h treatment) were used.
2.5. Sample size estimation
Our fundamental step was to design a large value of computational power (at least 80%) with effective sample size within the available resources and ethical considerations. The variance or standard deviation for sample size calculation was obtained from our pilot study. For every differential expression analysis, the p-value was calculated. To this effect we required (n = 22, power = 80% and α = 5% per group), using Systat software for two mean calculations. Our ultimate goal was to establish the role of the SUMO pathway by examining a large sample size to gain understanding of the SUMOylation level in IBD.
2.6. Human colonic biopsy samples
A total of 66 patients in the UC, CD and control groups were included in the study, from the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS). Samples were collected from 22 patients in the UC, CD and control (IBD suspected) groups with age over 18 and below 60 years. Inclusion criteria for UC were: (i) patients with suggestive history and characteristic endoscopic and histological findings of UC (ECCO consensus statement) as enrolled from the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Clinic at the Department of Gastroenterology, AIIMS; (ii) patients with an ulcerative colitis disease activity index (UCDAI) of mild to moderate; and (iii) patients with pan colitis or left-sided colitis. Exclusion criteria for UC were: (i) patients with proctitis; (ii) patients already initiated on steroid therapy; and (iii) patients with coexistent disease such as HIV infection, tuberculosis or chronic renal failure. Inclusion criteria for CD were: (i) the diagnosis of CD established on the basis of the presence of characteristic clinical manifestations (chronic diarrhoea, haematochezia, abdominal pain and intestinal obstructive manifestations), endoscopic features (skip lesions, asymmetrical involvement, longitudinal ulcers, aphthous ulcers) and histological evidence (acute or chronic colitis, the presence of inflammation extending beyond muscularis mucosae, lymphoid follicles and granuloma) (ECCO guidelines for diagnosis); and (ii) adult patients with ileocolonic disease and Crohn's disease activity index (CDAI) greater than 150 and less than 350. Exclusion criteria for CD were: (i) patients already initiated on steroid therapy; and (ii) patients with coexistent disease such as HIV infection, tuberculosis or chronic renal failure. Adult patients suspected of having IBD bur showing normal mucosa on colonoscopy were treated as controls. Four to six biopsies from inflamed areas and non-inflamed areas of the colon were also taken from a few patients. Informed consent was obtained from all the patients and the study protocol was submitted to the ethics committee of the institutes: RCB and AIIMS (approval no. IEC/NP/56/2014, OP-16/01.08.2015).
2.7. Cell culture
HCT-8 intestinal epithelial cells (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA) (passages 2–25) were cultured in RPMI medium supplemented with 14 mM NaHCO3, 15 mM HEPES buffer (pH 7.4), 2 mM glutamine, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 40 mg l−1 penicillin, 8 mg l−1 ampicillin, 90 mg l−1 streptomycin and 10% FBS. HeLa cells were cultured in DMEM containing 14 mM NaHCO3, 15 mM HEPES buffer (pH 7.5), 8 mg l−1 ampicillin, 100 U ml−1 penicillin–streptomycin and 10% FBS. Cells were treated with different pharmacological inhibitors: MG-132, 20 μM for 1 h (Sigma), and AKT1 kinase inhibitor, 100 nM for 1 h (Sigma). Recombinant IL-6 (Biovision, USA) was used at 100 ng ml−1 for 6 h in different conditions.
2.8. Cell transfection
HCT-8 and HeLa cells were used for transfection. One day before transfection, 2.5 × 105 cells were plated in 24-well plates to obtain 50–80% confluence and transfected with Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) or DharmaFECT (Dharmacon, USA) as per the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, 1 µg of plasmid or 20 pmol of small interfering RNA (siRNA) (Dharmacon) was diluted in Opti-MEM (Invitrogen). Separately, Lipofectamine 2000 for plasmid and DharmaFECT for siRNA transfection were also diluted and incubated at room temperature for 5 min. Following incubation, the two mixtures were combined and incubated at room temperature for 20 min. This cocktail was added to cells with Opti-MEM and incubated without selection for 24 h.
2.9. Western blot
Tissues were lysed in Laemmli buffer (20 mM Tris–HCl, pH 8.0, 150 mM KCl, 10% glycerol, 5 mM MgCl2 and 0.1% NP40) supplemented with Halt complete proteases inhibitor. Protein lysates were separated on sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS–PAGE) and transferred to nitrocellulose membrane. Blots were probed with antibodies against Ubc9 (Sigma), SUMO1 (Sigma), SUMO2/3 (Sigma), AKT (CST, USA), p-AKT (CST, USA), Akt1 (CST, USA), p-Akt1 (CST, USA), GSK3β (Abcam, USA) and p-GSK3β (CST, USA). Akt1 kinase activity was assessed using a kit (CST, USA).
2.10. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction
Total RNA from human, mouse and animal cells was isolated using the Nucleo Spin RNA-II Kit (MN, Germany) according to the manufacturer's protocol. One microgram of each total RNA sample was used to synthesize c-DNA using the i-Script cDNA Synthesis Kit (Bio-Rad, USA). Real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) was performed using a 20 μl reaction volume in a 96-well plate by using i-Taq Syber Green (Bio-Rad) according to the manufacturer's instruction in the Bio-Rad CFX 96™ Real Time Detection System. All reactions were normalized to the housekeeping genes GAPDH and HPRT for human and actin and B2M for mouse samples. See the electronic supplementary material for primer sequences.
2.11. Nuclear factor κB polymerase chain reaction array
Total RNA was isolated from HCT-8 cells and mouse colonic tissue using the Nucleo Spin RNA-II Kit (MN, Germany) according to the manufacturer's protocol. One microgram of each total RNA sample was used to synthesize c-DNA using the RT2 First Strand Kit (QIAGEN, SA Biosciences, USA) according to the manufacturer's protocol. qRT-PCR array was performed using RT2 Syber Green Master Mix (QIAGEN, SA Biosciences, USA) on 96-well plates of Human NFκB Signalling Pathway Array (Cat. No. PAHS-025Z) (QIAGEN, SA Biosciences, USA) and Mouse NFκB Signalling Pathway Array (Cat. No. PAHS-025Y). The PCR reaction was performed following the manufacturer's protocol. The experiment was performed on the Bio-Rad CFX 96™ Real Time Detection System (Bio-Rad). The data were analysed using the RT² Profiler™ PCR Array Data Analysis web-based tool (QIAGEN, SA Biosciences, USA).
2.12. Immunoprecipitation
Mouse and human tissue were lysed in immunoprecipitation (IP) lysis buffer (Thermo, USA). Halt proteases complete inhibitor mix (1×) and 20 mM NEM were added to the mixture. Cell debris was removed by centrifugation at 13 000 r.p.m. for 10 min at 4°C. The lysates obtained were incubated with protein G agarose (Thermo) beads for 1 h at 4°C on an end-to-end rotor, followed by centrifugation to remove the beads and the non-specifically bound proteins. The precleared lysate was then used for immune precipitation with their respective antibodies overnight at 4°C on an end-to-end rotor. As isotype controls, IgGs were used. The antibody-bound proteins were then captured using protein G agarose beads and washed five times with IP lysis buffer followed by heating at 95°C for 10 min in laemmli's buffer. For IP, two mice colonic tissue lysates and five patient biopsies were pooled in each category, respectively. Five hundred micrograms protein were used for IP. Isotype IgG (negative control) was also prepared for control samples. Immunoblots were done in triplicate using different mice total colonic lysates.
2.13. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
Biopsies were pooled from five patients of each category. The homogenized sample was incubated for 5 min at room temperature to permit the complete dissociation of nucleoprotein complexes. Thereafter, the homogenate sample was centrifuged to remove cell debris and the supernatant was transferred to a new tube. The supernatant was assayed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for IL-6, IFN-γ, TNF-α, TGF-β, IL-10, IL-8 and thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) using the manufacturer's protocol (R&D, USA; DY206, DY285, DY210, DY240, DY217B, DY1398, respectively).
2.14. Liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry
LC-MS/MS analyses were performed using colonic epithelial cell lysate pooled from two mice, which was immunoprecipitated with SUMO1 (Santa Cruz, USA) antibody. Five hundred micrograms of protein lysates were used for the analysis. In-gel digestion was carried out using Trypsin Gold (Promega, USA) at 1 : 50 dilution. The samples were purified using C18 SepPak columns (Thermo, USA). The peptide samples were dissolved in 98% milliQ-H2O, 2% acetonitrile and 0.1% formic acid. Tandem MS analysis was performed using a 5600 TripleTOF analyzer (ABSCIEX) in Information Dependent mode. Precursor ions were selected across the mass range of 300–1600 m/z. Protein identification was performed with MASCOT Server 2.3.0 (Matrix Science, UK). User-defined search parameters were as follows: (i) type of search: MS/MS ion search; (ii) enzyme: trypsin; (iii) mass values: monoisotopic; (iv) protein mass: unrestricted; (v) peptide mass tolerance: ±100 ppm; (vi) fragment mass tolerance: ±0.5 Da; (vii) max missed cleavages: 2; (viii) instrument type: ESI_QUAD-TOF; and (ix) taxonomy: Mus musculus (mouse). A MASCOT search against a concatenated decoy target database from Swiss-Prot consisting of both forward and reverse versions of murine peptides was performed to evolve the cut-off score threshold (p < 0.3–0.05). Proteins were selected for further analyses based on peptide score (greater than 16) and were divided into two groups in the all the three samples. Proteins identified by the MASCOT search were used for the analysis with a minimum of one unique peptide.
2.15. Scaffold software
Scaffold (version 4.4.8; Proteome Software Inc., Portland, OR, USA) was used to validate MS/MS-based peptide and protein identifications. All MS/MS samples were analysed using MASCOT (Matrix Science, London, UK; v. 2.3.02) and Tandem (The GPM, version CYCLONE (2010.12.01.1). MASCOT and Tandem were set to search the SwissProt_57.15 database (selected for Mus., 16 281 entries) with digestion enzyme trypsin. Fragment ion mass tolerance of 0.50 Da and a parent ion tolerance of 100 ppm were used. Glu->pyro-Glu of the N-terminus, ammonia-loss of the N-terminus, Gln->pyro-Glu of the N-terminus and oxidation of histidine, methionine and tryptophan were specified in MASCOT and Tandem as variable modifications. Peptide identifications were accepted if they could be established at greater than 50.0% probability. The Peptide Prophet algorithm [11] assigned peptide probabilities with Scaffold delta-mass correction. The Scaffold local FDR algorithm assigned peptide probabilities from Tandem. Proteins that contained similar peptides and could not be differentiated based on MS/MS analysis alone were grouped to satisfy the principles of parsimony. Proteins sharing significant peptide evidence were grouped into clusters. The volcano plot was generated after performing the t-test using the software between DSS7 and control categories. A Venn diagram was generated from the total number of proteins identified using Scaffold Quantify function for all three categories of mice. Fold changes and p-values were also calculated using Scaffold. These data were used for pathway analysis.
2.16. Ingenuity pathway analysis
Data were arranged according to p-values. The cut-off criteria less than or equal to 0.05 for qRT-PCR and less than or equal to 0.5 for protein data were used. A fold change of greater than 2 and less than 0.5 was considered for qRT-PCR data and greater than 1.5 and less than 0.5 for protein data (upregulated and downregulated) were uploaded in the Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) (Ingenuity, CA, USA) tool. The canonical pathways were displayed according to percentage overlap with molecules of interest and p-values.
2.17. Wound-healing assay
Transfected HCT-8 cells were treated with mitomycin C (10 µg ml−1) for 6 h. Cell migration was measured using a wound-healing assay [12].
2.18. Statistics
All results are expressed as the mean standard error from an individual experiment done in triplicate. Data were analysed with standard two-tailed Student's t-test and the Mann–Whitney U-test where applicable, with p-values of 0.05–0.001 considered statistically significant. We evaluated the statistics with Systat and GraphPad Prism. Correlation studies were analysed with Spearman's correlation.
3. Results
3.1. SUMOylation pathway is down-modulated in chemically induced colitis in mice
We used the dextran–sodium–sulfate (DSS) mouse model to test the possibility of SUMOylation playing a role in intestinal inflammation. Groups of mice (six animals each) were fed plain water (control mice) or DSS mixed in their drinking water for either 3, 4 or 7 days (hereafter referred to as DSS-3 mice, DSS-4 mice and DSS-7 mice, respectively). Following the treatment, the animals were euthanized and the colonic tissues were isolated for analysis. Among these mice, DSS-7 mice as expected showed severe signs of inflammation (figure 1a) and significant weight loss (figure 1b). Haematoxylin and eosin staining of intestinal cross-sections of proximal colon of DSS-7 mice showed more neutrophil infiltrates, loss of crypt, colonic wall thickening, epithelial erosion and oedema (figure 1c). In contrast, DSS-4 animals did not display any weight loss or discernible signs of inflammation (figure 1b,c). SUMO E2 enzyme Ubc9 protein levels of DSS-4 mice in the proximal colon, distal colon and spleen (figure 1d–f) were comparable to the control animals. In the proximal colon of DSS-7 animals, a significant downregulation of Ubc9 (p < 0.05) (figure 1d) was observed relative to control. A mild downregulation of Ubc9 was also seen in the case of the distal colon, while in the spleen such lowering was not observed (figure 1e,f).
mRNA expression of Ubc9, as seen by qPCR analysis, reflected downregulation on day 4 (−4-fold) and day 3 (−2-fold) relative to control mice (figure 1g). These data indicate that Ubc9 downregulation is initiated even before the onset of markers of inflammation. Compared with control mice, the inflammatory cytokine IL-8/CXCL1 mRNA expression was pronounced in DSS-7 mice (p < 0.05), while that of Ubc9 was drastically decreased (p < 0.01), ranging from 1- to 30-fold downregulation (figure 1h). For the sake of convenience of understanding, DSS-7 mice were subgrouped in the following way for further analysis. DSS-7 mice with low Ubc9 (onefold to fivefold) were called DSS-7-Ubc9Low and those with severely downregulated Ubc9 (sixfold and above) were called DSS-7-Ubc9HyperLow. The subgrouping was done in this way because the decrease in Ubc9 among the animals was over a wide range. Among DSS-treated mice, Ubc9HyperLow mice outnumbered Ubc9Low. We examined if the Ubc9 protein levels correlated with RNA expression in Ubc9Low and Ubc9HyperLow mice. As can be seen in figure 1i, the Ubc9HyperLow lysates displayed lower amounts of Ubc9 compared with Ubc9Low lysates. In line with this, the global SUMO-1 and SUMO2/3 profiles of DSS-7 mice were also altered (figure 1j,k). We also checked the role of various deSUMOylases in the global reduction of SUMOylation in DSS mice. As can be seen in the electronic supplementary material, figure S1, except for SENP7 expression of none of the other SENPs were altered in DSS animals. A mild upregulation of free SUMO2/3 but not SUMO1 was seen in the global SUMOylation blots of DSS-treated animals (figure 1j,k). To investigate if Ubc9 levels were mainly affected in epithelial cells, gene expression of epithelial cells isolated from the colon was analysed. Clearly, epithelial lysates of DSS-7 mice displayed much lower Ubc9 expression than that of control mice (figure 1l). Furthermore, IHC also revealed expression of Ubc9 protein in the epithelial villi near to the nucleus in control mice but much less in DSS-7 mice (figure 1m). In line with this, the disease severity index (goblet cell loss, ulcers, epithelial erosions, neutrophil infiltration, etc.), as calculated by a blinded pathologist, also revealed that DSS-7 mice with hyperlow Ubc9 were more severely affected compared with other mice (figure 1n). On the basis of these data, we hypothesized that downregulation of Ubc9 may be an important prerequisite for the onset of inflammation.
3.2. Ubc9 modulates expression of inflammatory genes in colonic epithelium
To test SUMOylation-dependent modulation of inflammation, we used RNAi-mediated downregulation of Ubc9 in cultured epithelial cells (HCT-8) as shown in figure 2a. Inflammation-related gene expression analysis was carried out using qPCR array (SAB Bioscience, USA) for 84 different NFκB signalling pathway genes. As seen in figure 2b, compared with the control siRNA-treated cells (si_control cells, or C1 in figure 2b), about fourfold to fivefold downregulation of Ubc9 was seen in Ubc9-specific siRNA-treated cells (Ubc knockdown (UKD) cells). The qPCR data revealed a dramatic alteration of inflammatory genes such that genes encoding pro-inflammatory regulators RelA, cFos, cJun and others displayed significant activation (greater than threefold) (volcano plot, figure 2c).
Furthermore, overexpression of Ubc9-encoding plasmids (hereafter UOE cells, compared with C2 in figure 2b) resulted in severe dysregulation of several NFκB signalling pathway genes as shown in the heat maps of C versus UOE (figure 2d). The volcano plots (figure 2d) highlight the nature of chaos in inflammatory pathway genes. Crucial regulators such as Akt1, Birc3, Icam1, Stat1 and others were induced by more than threefold (p < 0.05) in UOE cells as shown in the tabular representation (figure 2e). Interestingly, level of RelA, cFos and cJun were downregulated in UOE conditions, hinting that level of Ubc9 in epithelium tightly controls expression of inflammatory genes. Based on the differential expression of genes in Ubc9 perturbed conditions, we were able to generate a network of interrelationship of genes highlighting nodes and biological relevance between various regulators using IPA software. The kinase Akt1 occupied a central hub in the inflammatory gene network, having regulatory connections with key regulators including STAT, CASP1, TNF family and chemokines (figure 2f). These data revealed that the SUMO pathway could potentially modulate the gene expression of the inflammatory pathway. We further validated our findings by individual qPCR analysis for some of these severely affected genes using in-house primers. PPARγ, a crucial regulator of gut homeostasis, known to be regulated by SUMOylation [13,14], displayed an upregulation in UOE samples, while in UKD samples it was downregulated (figure 2g). Together, these observations led us to conclude that perturbation of the SUMOylation machinery can bring forth profound changes in the expression of inflammatory genes in the epithelium.
3.3. Extent of SUMO E2 enzyme Ubc9 expression correlates with severity of colitis in mice
To extend our understanding of SUMO status and its relevance to the inflammatory network, we reverted to our mice model. We analysed gene expression using DSS-7 mice with either low or hyperlow levels of Ubc9, as shown in figure 3a. We reasoned that comparison of gene expression in DSS-7-Ubc9Low versus DSS-7-Ubc9HyperLow would highlight the significance of the severe downregulation of Ubc9 and its connection to the inflammatory pathway. Similar to the experiments done in epithelial cells, we carried out expression profiling using an inflammatory gene array (SAB Biosciences, USA) using different groups of animals: DSS-7-Ubc9Low, DSS-7-Ubc9HyperLow along with the control untreated group. The experiment was done three times following standard guidelines. The data revealed that several inflammatory markers and other crucial genes of the inflammatory pathway such as cJun, c Fos, TLRs, BIRC2, IL-8, RelA and EGR were induced by greater than threefold (p < 0.05) during DSS treatment. A more dramatic activation of inflammatory pathway genes was seen in DSS-7-Ubc9HyperLow versus the DSS-7-Ubc9Low mice (figure 3b). More than 20 of 84 genes displayed an induction of 2.5-fold or above (p < 0.05) and five of 84 genes displayed 2.5-fold or above downregulation (figure 3b) (p < 0.05). Intriguingly Akt1, a master kinase which is otherwise not well explored in the context of IBD, was among the downregulated genes in Ubc9HyperLow compared with control mice (−7-fold) and DSS-7-Ubc9Low (−2.5-fold) as shown in figure 3c. For master kinases such as Akt1, where even the slightest fluctuations are known to be detrimental, the effect of SUMOylation perturbation seemed intriguing.
We further investigated the RT-PCR data with fold expression and p-value threshold (less than 0.05) of genes, with GAPDH as reference, using IPA software, which is a computational tool for the integration and understanding of complex data. Differentially expressed genes from DSS-7-Ubc9HyperLow when compared with DSS-7-Ubc9Low and control mice were overlaid in a database to algorithmically generate a pathway network based on data available in the software. IPA comparative analysis of samples DSS-7-Ubc9HyperLow with respect to DSS-7-Ubc9low revealed involvement of TREM, NFκB, TLR and TNFR2 signalling pathways (figure 3d). Based on the differential gene expression in the control and the colitis animals' conditions, we were able to generate a network of interrelationship of genes highlighting nodes and biological relevance between various regulators. Based on the analysis, Akt1 occupied a central hub in the inflammatory gene network, having direct regulatory connections with key regulators including Jun, FAK, IFN-γ, p38 and STAT that have relevance to the field of IBD (figure 3e).
3.4. Mice with severe intestinal inflammation display a distinct SUMO-1 proteome
Next, we set forth to determine the intestinal epithelial SUMOylome. Here, we were interested in understanding the colitis-specific SUMOylome in intestinal inflammation in vivo. As SUMO-1 participates in both SUMO-1 and in SUMO2/3-conjugated proteins, we restricted our analysis to the SUMO1-conjugated proteome (hereafter called SUMO-1 proteome). Lysates from control and DSS-7 animals were immunoprecipitated using anti-SUMO-1 antibodies (figure 4a) and global repression of SUMO-1 conjugates was clearly seen in DSS-7 mice samples (DSS-7-Ubc9HyperLow). The lysates were resolved by SDS–PAGE followed by in-gel tryptic digestion. These samples were subjected to ESI MS/MS using the ABSCIEX 5600 machine (details in Material and methods). The data files were transformed into peptide maps using offline software ProteinPilot and MASCOT. Using the online Panther tool [15], we identified proteins present in various categories. SUMO-1 and SUMO-2 were identified and thus acted as the positive control for our experiment. Several interesting proteins among these included: (i) inflammatory pathways mediated by cytokines, (ii) MAPK/IGF, (iii) JAK/STAT, (iv) T-cell activation and (v) TGFβ signalling were upregulated in DSS-7 compared with control mice as shown in the pathway analysis graph (figure 4b). By contrast, proteins involved in autophagy were seen to be more abundant in control samples (figure 4b). We observed that several key regulators including Akt1 kinase and BIRC3 were present only in control samples but not in DSS-7 animals, implying lower abundance of their SUMOylated forms in colitis-associated epithelium. The electronic supplementary material, table S1 represents a list of important identified proteins with SUMO-binding motif and (SBM) and SUMO-interacting motif (SIM) in the proteins identified by using GPS SBM 1.0 [16]. Proteins such as NCoR1 [14], RORγ [17], STAT1 [18] and Akt1 [19] have been reported to undergo SUMOylation. Among the identified proteins, several have also been previously reported in bowel disease [20] such as: STAT1 [18], Nod2 [21], ATG9B [22], IRAK1 [23], IL-17R [2], RORγ [17] and NCoR1 [14]. We further analysed our data using Scaffold (v. 4.4.8, Proteome Software Inc.), which uses the peptide prophet and protein prophet algorithms for stringent data analysis. Numbers of different proteins identified in control compared with DSS-7 mice are represented in the Venn diagram (figure 4c). Our analysis revealed a large number of proteins, 428 in the control group compared with 379 DSS-7 mice. Among these, 117 proteins exclusively found in control mice were subjected to IPA signalling analysis. These were seen to be associated with thiosulfate disproportion III pathway, granzyme B signalling and ATM signalling (electronic supplementary material, figure S2a). Sixty-eight proteins were exclusively found in DSS-7 samples. These were proteins known to be involved in dendritic cell maturation, NRF2 oxidative stress response, hepatic fibrosis and the thioredoxin pathway (electronic supplementary material, figure S2b). Moreover, when DSS-7 were compared with control samples, pathways such as EIF2 signalling, mitochondrial dysfunction, eIF4/S6K signalling, unfolded proteins response and viral entry pathways were identified (electronic supplementary material, figure S2c). Some of these pathways found from our analysis, such as ILK (integrin-linked kinases) signalling, that are associated with cell proliferation, migration and adhesion [24], mitochondrial dysfunction and unfolded protein response, are relevant to IBD [25]. Interestingly, Akt1 was also present in control samples, but not in DSS-7 samples. Akt1 being a major mediator of cell signalling, we further investigated SUMOylation-dependent Akt1 levels and activity in mice samples.
Levels of total Akt (hereafter PAN-Akt) which includes Akt1, Akt2 and Akt3 were examined (figure 5a). No significant change was seen in the protein levels of PAN-Akt in DSS-4 and DSS-7 mice in the proximal and distal region of the colon. Interestingly, phosphorylated-Akt1 (active form or pAkt1) increased in DSS-4 mice, while it decreased in DSS-7 mice. This was in line with the reduced levels of Ubc9 in DSS-7 mice. Together, these data reveal that Akt1 and p-AKT1, but not total AKT, were lowered in inflammed intestinal tissues. Next, we carried out IP of mice colonic lysates using SUMO1 antibody. First, SUMO-Akt1 bands displayed higher mobility (approx. 75 kDa) than the unmodified Akt1 (approx. 60 kDa) and were significantly reduced in expression in DSS-treated animals compared with control animals (figure 5b). To examine this by an alternative method, samples were immunoprecipitated with Akt1 antibody and probed with SUMO-1 antibody. Similar to above, SUMOylated-Akt1 was seen to be more in control samples compared with those from DSS-7 (figure 5b, lower panel). A more pronounced decrease in levels of SUMOyated-Akt1 and Akt1 was seen in DSS-7HyperLow compared with DSSLow or control animals (figure 5b). To check proportions of pAkt1 and SUMOylated-Akt1 (or SUMO-Akt1), we loaded exactly 10% of the input used for IP and probed for each of SUMO-1, pAkt1 and Akt1. Precise ratios of pAkt1/SUMO-Akt1 were determined by normalization of densitometry values of the band (figure 5b, right panel). Interestingly, the abundance of pAkt1 in samples was 49% of total Akt1 in control lysates, while 36% and 25% of total Akt1 in DSSLow and DSSHyperLow samples, respectively. Notably, SUMO-Akt1 was 3.66% of total Akt1 in control compared with 1.2% and 0.8% in DSSLow and DSSHyperLow samples, respectively. Clearly, the SUMO-Akt1 was most dramatically affected in the DSSHyperLow samples.
To examine the effect of the lowered levels of Akt1 on its function, we probed phosphorylation of GSK3β, a cognate substrate of Akt1. Akt1 is known to catalyse phosphorylation of GSK3β at serine 9 (GSK3βS9). GSK3βS9 phosphorylation was significantly lowered in DSS-7 samples with the levels being lowest in DSSHyperLow samples (figure 5c,d). To further consolidate this point, we used a non-radioactive Akt kinase activity assay. Phosphorylated Akt1 was immunoprecipitated from tissue lysates followed by in vitro measurement of kinase activity on recombinant GSK3β in the presence of ATP. As can be seen in figure 5e, both pAkt1 and pGSK3β were lowered in the DSS-treated mice samples. Together, these data suggest that DSS colitis leads to reduced levels of Ubc9, which in turn lead to a lowered level of pAkt1 and its activity.
Literature suggests that SUMOylation of Akt1 is phosphorylation-dependent and promotes its stabilization [19,26]. Mechanistically, it was important to examine if the phosphorylated form of Akt1 was capable of undergoing SUMOylation in the context of intestinal inflammation. We carried out IP experiments using Ubc9 antibody and probed for pAkt1; we observed a strong interaction of phospo-Akt1 with Ubc9, which meant that pAkt1 in intestinal inflammation, similar to earlier studies, was capable of interacting with Ubc9 and undergoing SUMOylation. The interaction was diminished in DSS-treated animals, which may be due to decreased amounts of both pAkt1 and Ubc9 (figure 5f). Overall, our data support the role of SUMOylation in DSS-induced colitis in mice and highlights the hypothesis that lowering of Akt1 SUMOylation correlates with severely decreased levels of Ubc9. Given the role of SUMOylation in inflammatory signalling, we next tested the role of SUMOylation in conditions of intestinal inflammation in human intestinal diseases.
3.5. Downregulation of Ubc9 and lowered activity of Akt1 in human inflammatory bowel disease samples
To investigate if these findings are relevant to human IBD patients, colonic biopsy samples were obtained by lower-endoscopic procedure in patients (age group 15–60 years) suffering from UC, CD and control individuals (suspected of IBD but declared negative). The required sample size was calculated to be 22 (statistical power of greater than 80% and α = 5% per group) for each of CD, UC and control groups based on our pilot study. Compared with control individuals, intestines of CD and UC patients displayed inflammation as can be seen by images taken during colonoscopy (figure 6a). This was also evident from qPCR IL-8 mRNA expression analysis (figure 6b,c), which revealed significant upregulation in CD and UC samples. In the case of SUMOylation pathway genes, while the expression of Sae-2 remained more or less unchanged, the expression of Ubc9 displayed drastic repression, between 25- and 50-fold in some cases (red dots, figure 6b,c) and five- and 25-fold (black dots figure 6b,c) in others. The Ubc9 protein levels were also reduced in both UC and CD (figure 6d). We examined if reduced levels of Ubc9 had an effect on global SUMOylation in these samples. We observed a significant downmodulation of the overall SUMO conjugation in the UC and CD samples (figure 6d).
To further understand the role of Ubc9 in the pathophysiology of IBD, we subgrouped the patients with varying levels of Ubc9, such that Ubc9 mildly downregulated samples (between five- and 25-fold) of CD were referred to as CDUBC9-Low and of UC as UCUBC9-Low. Similarly, the more severely downregulated Ubc9 (between 25- and 50-fold) in CD samples were referred to as CDUBC9-HyperLow and UC as UCUBC9-HyperLow. Interestingly, the CDUBC9-HyperLow and UCUBC9-HyperLow samples displayed a higher IL-8 mRNA compared with CDUBC9-Low and UCUBC9-Low, respectively (figure 6b,c). We also examined the expression of several E3-SUMO enzymes, among which PIAS1 [27] was also downregulated in both UC and CD (data not shown).
To overcome the limitation of sample quantity and to get an averaged essence, we pooled samples (five in each category as explained in Material and methods) and carried out ELISAs of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-6, TNF-α and IFN-γ. Each of these marker cytokines were elevated in the CD and UC samples. Intriguingly, their levels were further elevated in CDUBC9-HyperLow and UCUBC9-HyperLow (figure 6e). Levels of anti-inflammatory cytokines including TSLP, IL-10 and TGF-β were lesser in the CDUBC9-HyperLow and UCUBC9-HyperLow compared with CDUBC9-Low and UCUBC9-Low (figure 6e). TGFβ was slightly higher in the CD and UC samples, with no major difference between groups with varying Ubc9. This cytokine has anyway been assigned dual roles including pro- and anti-inflammatory activities in the context of the gastrointestinal tract [4].
Next, we wanted to study the correlation of Ubc9 repression with the disease severity in CD and UC patients. The details of the UC and CD patient clinical parameters are shown in table 1. Briefly, four (18.18%) patients had left-sided colitis, and 18 (72.7%) had pancolitis in UC, whereas in CD most (20, 92.9%) had L2 colon disease. Out of all 44 patients in both diseased groups, 26 had mild and 18 had moderate to severe disease activity (17 moderate, one severe). The baseline characteristics of UC and CD patients with disease activity index are shown in table 1. The decrease in expression of UBC-9 was correlated with UCDAI and CDAI in UC and CD patients, respectively. The correlation indicated that the UCDAI and CDAI were maximal in the case of UC UBC9-hyperLow and CD UBC9-hyperLow among UC and CD patients, respectively. In the case of UC patients, the UBC9HyperLow category displayed a higher number of patients in relapse when compared with the UBC9Low category. Next, we investigated the status of Ubc9 substrate Akt1 in UC and CD of pooled biopsy samples. As expected, these samples also displayed the same pattern of lowering of Akt1 at RNA levels in UC and CD patients samples (figure 6f). Repression was also seen in the case of p-Akt1, and akin to the DSS mice model SUMO-conjugated pools of Akt1 were lower in CD and UC patients as seen by SUMO-1 IP of the protein lysates (figure 6g). The status of Akt substrate phospho-GSK3β was also lowered in CD and UC patients compared with controls (figure 6h). Together, these data reveal that in IBD patient samples the SUMOylation machinery functions at suboptimal levels and this is accompanied with lowered Akt1 activity and heightened inflammation.
Table 1.
ulcerative colitis characteristics | UBC9Low (n = 6) | UBC9HyperLow (n = 16) | p-value | |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | gender (male : female) | 4 : 2 | 10 : 6 | 0.58 |
2 | age in years (mean ± s.d.) | 37.7 ± 14.1 | 36.4 ± 14.4 | 0.32 |
3 | duration of disease (mean ± s.d.) in years | 2.24 ± 1.05 | 2.37 ± 1.04 | |
4 | UCDAI at entry (mean ± s.d.) | 0.82 ± 0.33 | 5.48 ± 1.43 | 0.005 |
5 | disease extent (number of patients) | |||
left-sided colitis | 2 (33.8%) | 2 (12.8%) | ||
pancolitis | 4 (66.5%) | 14 (87.5%) | ||
6 | concomitant medications (number of patients) | |||
5-aminosalicylic acid | 6 (100%) | 12 (75%) | ||
steroids | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | ||
azathioprine | 4 (66.67%) | 8 (50%) | ||
Crohn's disease characteristics | UBC9Low (n = 10) | UBC9HyperLow (n = 12) | p-value | |
1 | gender (male : female) | 6 : 4 | 10 : 2 | 0.58 |
2 | age in years (mean ± s.d.) | 40.2 ± 4.8 | 42.4 ± 8.2 | |
3 | duration of disease (mean ± s.d.) in years | 2.86 ± 1.23 | 3.48 ± 1.04 | |
4 | CDAI at entry (mean ± s.d.) | 166.34 ± 8.33 | 315.67 ± 22.43 | 0.021 |
5 | disease extent (number of patients) | |||
L1: terminal ileum | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0%) | ||
L2: colon | 10 (100%) | 10 (83.2%) | ||
L3: ileocolonic | 0 (0.0%) | 2 (16.8%) | ||
6 | concomitant medications (number of patients) | |||
5-aminosalicylic acid | 10 (100%) | 8 (66.7%) | ||
steroids | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | ||
azathioprine | 10 (100%) | 6 (50%) |
3.6. Ubc9 downregulation subprogrammes inflammatory environment via Akt1 signalling in epithelial cells
Lowering of Ubc9 in DSS mice and IBD patient samples resulted in increased disease severity indices and this led us to ask whether Ubc9 alteration is the basis for the exacerbated colitis or merely a consequence of the underlying disorder. Therefore, we next set forth to understand the interplay of Akt1 and Ubc9 in detail using in vitro and ex vivo models. In Ubc9 knocked-down HCT-8 cells, we observed a significant lowering of total Akt1 and pAkt1 (figure 7a–c). Interestingly, Ubc9 upregulation resulted in an increase in the Akt1 protein and pAkt1 levels (figure 7a), thus revealing a possible direct upstream effect of Ubc9 on Akt1 expression. The densitometry of the blots shows that these changes were significant (figure 7b–d). Inhibition of Akt1 by Akt-specific inhibitor or Akt1-siRNA in HCT-8 cells did not result in significant changes in levels of Ubc9 (figure 7e), thus suggesting that Ubc9 controls Akt1 expression and not vice versa.
To test if the Ubc9-mediated regulation of Akt1 was not an effect restricted only to cell lines, we analysed gene expression in primary intestinal epithelial cells (PIECs) isolated from mice colon (figure 7f). As PIECs are recalcitrant to genetic manipulations, we used chemical agents to inhibit Ubc9 [9,28] and Akt1. As can been seen in figure 7g, inhibition of Ubc9 by SAM or LLO resulted in concomitant loss of p-Akt1 levels. On the other hand, inhibition of Akt1 with a chemical inhibitor (Akt inhibitor VIII trifluoroacetate salt hydrate, Sigma) did not lead to any detectable reduction in levels of Ubc9. The densitometric analysis of the blots is also plotted (figure 7g right-hand panel). Moreover, the culture supernatants of PIECs inhibited for p-Akt1 showed increased levels of IFN-γ, thus pointing towards an increase in pro-inflammatory signalling (figure 7h). Similar to these, LLO and SAM-treated PIECs also displayed an increase in IFN-γ levels. In the case of LLO treatment, there was also a decrease in levels of anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 (figure 7i). The cytokine levels were also checked in DSS-7-treated mice epithelial cells for comparison, in which IFN-γ was secreted more and IL-10 was secreted less compared with cells from control animals. Together, these data suggest that Ubc9 modulates expression of inflammatory cytokines via Akt1.
3.7. Epithelial wound healing is linked to Akt1 SUMOylation
To examine if Ubc9 and Akt1 crosstalk leading to heightened inflammation was due to reduced healing of epithelium, we carried out cytokine assays and wound-healing assays in epithelial cells. In these assays, supernatant of UKD samples in HCT-8 cells resulted in increased secretion of IL-8 (figure 8a). Similar results were also obtained when HeLA cells, treated with Ubc9-specific siRNA and stimulated with IL-6, were examined for inflammatory cytokines compared with control cells (data not shown). In line with this result, expression of a SUMOylation-deficient K276R mutant of Akt1 (hereafter SMUT-Akt1) displayed higher levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Protein levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-8, TNF-α and IFN-γ were seen to be higher in supernatants of cells overexpressing SMUT-Akt1 compared with those from wild-type (WT) or kinase-dead Akt1 (DN). Levels of anti-inflammatory cytokines TSLP and IL-10 were blunted in SMUT-Akt1 transfected cells (figure 8b). As the Akt1/β-catenin pathway is strongly connected to wound healing and epithelial proliferation [29], we reasoned that the observed Akt1-dependent inflammatory signalling could be due to failure of wound healing. We carried out wound-healing assays [12] using HCT-8 cells. WT Akt1 transfection leads to significant healing compared with the kinase dead DN-Akt1 or SMUT-Akt1 (figure 8c). Healing was also seen to be less in UKD cells (figure 8c). Interestingly, SMUT-Akt1-expressing cells were most severely affected. This was also evident from the wound closure analysis (figure 8c, bottom panel). Expression of crucial wound-healing markers TNFIAP3 and TNFIAP8 increased (up to 10-fold) in WT-Akt1. TNFIAP3 and TNFIAP8 were downregulated in SMUT-Akt1 samples (figure 8d). The expression of NOS-2 was upregulated in SMUT-Akt1. No significant change was seen in the expression of Cx43 and PTGES2 genes. In line with this expression, TNFAIP3 and TNFAIP8 were severely downregulated in UCUBC9-hyperLow human patient biopsy samples. Level of PTGES2 on the other hand was downregulated in both UC and CD UBC9-HyperLow patient samples compared with UC and CD UBC9Low samples (figure 8e). Together, these data reveal that Ubc9-dependent lowering of Akt1, particularly SUMOylated-Akt1, may be responsible for failure of wound healing which itself may be promoting pro-inflammatory mechanisms in epithelium. Overall, our results highlight that these changes are detrimental to functioning of inflammatory regulators and production of key cytokines, events that are important for intestinal inflammation.
4. Discussion
In this work, we have investigated the importance of SUMOylation and its connection to IBD. We demonstrated that SUMOylation alteration perhaps assumes a central role in subprogramming molecular pathways when cells transit from a healthy state to an inflamed state. Although SUMOylation has not been explored at all in IBD, it is not surprising that SUMOylation is important, given it has been an emerging paradigm in the case of inflammatory diseases and immune biology [10,30]. The causative reason for the observed SUMOylation alteration was downregulation of the sole SUMO E2 conjugating enzyme, Ubc9. This enzyme, being the only E2 enzyme, is seen to be sufficient to regulate the overall SUMO status as seen in many instances including a mutant cell model of colon cancer, brain astrocytes, KRAS and invasion of colonic cells by gut pathogens like Salmonella and others [8,31–34]. Similarly, in rat brain cells, SUMOylation was required for the suppression of inflammatory responses by LXRs in IFN-γ-stimulated astrocytes [35]. Thus, there are numerous examples of SUMOylation-dependent control of inflammation including those involving SENPs [30]. The downregulation of Ubc9 and global SUMOylation leads to an alteration in the SUMOylome which potentially modulates the cellular proteome leading to dramatic signalling and transcriptional subprogramming [36,37]. PTM machineries acting as molecular switches and governing cellular transcriptional programmes have been recently reported [38]. Control of inflammatory regulators PIAS1, NFκB and JunB is already known [39]. These regulatory factors are equipped with abilities to bring forth rapid and reversible changes in a cell in a context-dependent manner.
Our experiments in the DSS mice model revealed Ubc9 expression alteration begins even before the onset of discernible symptoms of inflammation. Intriguingly, Ubc9 downregulation was discernible mainly in the proximal colon initially (day 3); possibly this might be tissue level signalling that later transduces to the distal colon in terms of inflammation, as on day 7 Ubc9 decrease was observed in distal colon as well. In mice as well as in human patient samples, the disease severity, as may be seen by cytokine profiling or disease severity index, was more pronounced depending on the extent of Ubc9 downregulation.
The epithelium is known to regulate the dendritic cell and other immune cell function by secreting a battery of cytokines such as thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) and prostaglandin E2 [40,41]. Epithelial Hassall's corpuscles of the thymus secrete TSLP, where it activates myeloid dendritic cells, a process that promotes the proliferation of regulatory T cells [42]. TSLP expression in some mucosal surfaces have been reported to be NFκB-dependent [43]. In line with this, these patients displayed a higher levels of IFN-γ, a pro-inflammatory cytokine known to be secreted by dendritic cells and other immune effectors in response to the epithelial signals [40,41]. Intestinal epithelial cells secrete TSLP to condition the non-inflammatory status of dendritic cells, and they later secrete IL-10 and IL-6 which programmes a TH2 non-inflammatory response [43]. Also, TGF-β that is known to negatively regulate the NFκB-dependent genes was found to be lower in the patient samples with UBC9HyperLow. Contrary to this, pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IFN-γ, TNF-α and IL-6 were considerably higher in CDUBC9-HyperLow and UCUBC9-HyperLow compared with the control group (p < 0.05). This implied that in the patients with lowered Ubc9 and SUMOylation machinery, the conditions were more favourable for inflammation.
The DSS-colitis mice displayed a distinct SUMOylome compared with control animals. This may be due to several factors, the primary one being downregulation of Ubc9. The role of E3 ligases and SENPs may have either additive or synergistic effect, which cannot be ruled out.
Among the affected candidates, we saw a large group of factors that were transcriptional regulators, inflammatory mediators, kinases (such as Akt1), immune regulators and vesicular transport system members. This gives us an idea of the scale at which altered SUMOylation machinery can affect the cell. A computational analysis of genes known to be important for IBD reveals that several among them have potential SUMO conjugation sites and/or SIMs (electronic supplementary material, table S2). Involvement of Akt1 in colitis as revealed by our study is one such example. It is surprising that this important kinase has not been well explored in the pathophysiology of IBD. Total AKT (Akt1, Akt2 and Akt3) increased during development of various cancers, but in contrast, Akt1 levels were seen to be diminished [44]. Thus, the various isoforms of AKT are non-redundant and have context-dependent functions [45,46]. Recently, several groups have reported the role of SUMOylation in controlling Akt1 function [19,26]. In our case, we saw lowering of levels of Akt1 gene transcripts, total Akt and phospho-Akt1. These changes were accompanied with compromised activity of Akt1 in cells with lowered Ubc9. This is in line with a report by Lin et al. [19] who demonstrated that Akt1 SUMOylation enhances its own stability and the status of global cellular SUMOylation. Deleterious effects of Akt1 lowering were reported by Ding et al. [47], who observed repressed levels of pAkt1 (S473) kinase in inflamed Ubc9-defecient Treg cells. Similarly, ablation of Akt1, but not Akt2, promoted DSS-induced IBD in mice [48]. ERK signalling activation and epithelial and mesenchymal transition (EMT) is induced upon Akt1 downregulation. EMT is involved in chronic inflammation during IBD [49]. The connection of inflammation and Akt1 substrate GSK3β was also seen in our work. GSK3β signalling is a very complex phenomenon and its precise connection to IBD will be an interesting avenue for future investigations. IBD pathophysiology involves cumulative effects of epithelial inflammatory signalling as well as wound-healing mechanisms. We also observed that both SMUT-Akt1 cells and those that are knocked-down for Ubc9 displayed compromised wound healing. A positive role of Akt pathway in wound healing and cell proliferation has been well reported, which supports our results [50–53]. During IBD, intestinal tissue actively engages in wound-healing mechanisms. Failure of wound healing, as seen in our experiments in the case of CDUBC9-HyperLow or UCUBC9-HyperLow, may activate further inflammation and result in a vicious cycle leading to disease severity.
Our work highlights the role of SUMOylation in multiple points of the inflammatory pathway (figure 9) and thus raises the potential of SUMOylation as a single point that may be targeted for fine-tuning the inflammatory circuit for therapeutic treatment of autoimmune disorders. As SUMOylation is the common switch for the regulators that control intestinal inflammation and disease, we postulate that this novel theme may be taken as a new lead for therapeutic intervention for IBD.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank Bobby Cherayil, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA, for all the discussions and feedback while the manuscript was being prepared. We thank Satyajit Rath, National Institute of Immunology, for his help. We thank Madhav Rao and RCB Mass-Spec facility and CIF for assistance. Special thanks to Jonathan Pillai, THSTI, for his help in editing. We also thank Dr Gagan Jhingan for discussions and assistance regarding the analysis of proteomics data. We also thank Dr R. M. Pandey, AIIMS, New Delhi, for statistical analysis of human samples.
Ethics
All the required statutory clearances (Biosafety clearance, Animal ethics clearance and clearance for human subjects/samples) were obtained for all the experiments described in this manuscript. For animal experiments, NII Institutional Animal Ethics Committee approved the study (approval no. IAEC#331/14). For experiments involving human samples, the clearances were obtained from AIIMS (IEC/NP/56/2014,OP-16/01.08.2015) and RCB-IEC (ref no. RCB-IEC-H4). All experiments were also cleared by RCB biosafety committee (reference no. RCB/IBSC/16-17/042).
Data accessibility
All the data, code and material concerning the work are will be made publically available and are already provided within the manuscript. These are either part of the provided main dataset or the electronic supplementary material.
Authors' contributions
Study conception and design: C.V.S. and V.A. Acquisition of data: S.A.M., M.S., A.S., G.M., S.V., D.C., R.R., A.D. and S.S. Analysis and interpretation: C.V.S. and V.A.
Competing interests
We declare we have no competing interests.
Funding
Financial support was provided by DBT-Wellcome Trust fellowship and core funding from UNESCO-Regional Centre for Biotechnology, Faridabad, India.
References
- 1.Franke A, et al. 2010. Genome-wide meta-analysis increases to 71 the number of confirmed Crohn's disease susceptibility loci. Nat. Genet. 42, 1118–1125. (doi:10.1038/ng.717) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Anderson CA, et al. 2011. Meta-analysis identifies 29 additional ulcerative colitis risk loci, increasing the number of confirmed associations to 47. Nat. Genet. 43, 246–252. (doi:10.1038/ng.764) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hooper LV, Littman DR, Macpherson AJ. 2012. Interactions between the microbiota and the immune system. Science 336, 1268–1273. (doi:10.1126/science.1223490) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Yu LC-H, Wang J-T, Wei S-C, Ni Y-H. 2012. Host–microbial interactions and regulation of intestinal epithelial barrier function: from physiology to pathology. World J. Gastrointest. Pathophysiol. 3, 27–43. (doi:10.4291/wjgp.v3.i1.27) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ehrentraut SF, Colgan SP. 2012. Implications of protein post-translational modifications in IBD. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 18, 1378–1388. (doi:10.1002/ibd.22859) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hay RT. 2005. SUMO. Mol. Cell 18, 1–12. (doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2005.03.012) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Flotho A, Melchior F. 2013. Sumoylation: a regulatory protein modification in health and disease. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 82, 357–385. (doi:10.1146/annurev-biochem-061909-093311) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Verma S, Mohapatra G, Ahmad SM, Rana S, Jain S, Khalsa JK, Srikanth CV. 2015. Salmonella engages host microRNAs to modulate SUMOylation: a new arsenal for intracellular survival. Mol. Cell. Biol. 35, 2932–2946. (doi:10.1128/MCB.00397-15) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ribet D, et al. 2010. Listeria monocytogenes impairs SUMOylation for efficient infection. Nature 464, 1192–1195. (doi:10.1038/nature08963) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Mabb AM, Miyamoto S. 2007. SUMO and NF-κB ties. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 64, 1979–1996. (doi:10.1007/s00018-007-7005-2) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Keller A, Nesvizhskii AI, Kolker E, Aebersold R. et al. 2002. Empirical statistical model to estimate the accuracy of peptide identifications made by MS/MS and database search. Anal. Chem. 74, 5383–5392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Li R, Wei J, Jiang C, Liu D, Deng L, Zhang K, Wang P. 2013. Akt SUMOylation regulates cell proliferation and tumorigenesis. Cancer Res. 73, 5742–5753. (doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-0538) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lu J, Matunis MJ. 2013. A mediator methylation mystery: JMJD1C demethylates MDC1 to regulate DNA repair. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 20, 1346–1348. (doi:10.1038/nsmb.2729) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Pascual G, et al. 2005. A SUMOylation-dependent pathway mediates transrepression of inflammatory response genes by PPAR-γ. Nature 437, 759–763. (doi:10.1038/nature03988) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Thomas PD, Campbell MJ, Kejariwal A, Mi H, Karlak B, Daverman R, Diemer K, Muruganujan A, Narechania A. 2003 PANTHER: a library of protein families and subfamilies indexed by function. Genome Res. 13, 2129–2141. ( doi:10.1101/gr.772403) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 16. Zhao Q, Xie Y, Zheng Y, Jiang S, Liu W, Mu W, Zhao Y, Xue Y, Ren J. 2014 GPS-SUMO: a tool for the prediction of sumoylation sites and SUMO–interaction motifs. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, W325–W330. ( doi:10.1093/nar/gku383) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 17.Cook DN, Kang HS, Jetten AM. 2015. Retinoic acid-related orphan receptors (RORs): regulatory functions in immunity, development, circadian rhythm, and metabolism. Nucl. Recept. Res. 2, 101185. (doi:10.11131/2015/101185) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Li Y, de Haar C, Peppelenbosch MP, van der Woude CJ. 2012. New insights into the role of STAT3 in IBD. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 18, 1177–1183. (doi:10.1002/ibd.21884) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lin CH, Liu SY, Lee EHY. 2016. SUMO modification of Akt regulates global SUMOylation and substrate SUMOylation specificity through Akt phosphorylation of Ubc9 and SUMO1. Oncogene 35, 595–607. (doi:10.1038/onc.2015.115) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Pekow J, et al. 2013. Gene signature distinguishes patients with chronic ulcerative colitis harboring remote neoplastic lesions. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 19, 461–470. (doi:10.1097/MIB.0b013e3182802bac) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Cho JH, Abraham C. 2007. Inflammatory bowel disease genetics: Nod2. Annu. Rev. Med. 58, 401–416. (doi:10.1146/annurev.med.58.061705.145024) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Huett A, Goel G, Xavier RJ. 2010. A systems biology viewpoint on autophagy in health and disease. Curr. Opin. Gastroenterol. 26, 302–309. (doi:10.1097/MOG.0b013e32833ae2ed) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Weersma RK, Oostenbrug LE, Nolte IM, Van Der Steege G, Oosterom E, Van Dullemen HM, Kleibeuker JH, Dijkstra G. 2007. Association of interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase M (IRAK-M) and inflammatory bowel diseases. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 42, 827–833. (doi:10.1080/00365520601114024) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Yen C-F, Wang H-S, Lee C-L, Liao S-K. 2014. Roles of integrin-linked kinase in cell signaling and its perspectives as a therapeutic target. Gynecol. Minim. Invasive Ther. 3, 67–72. (doi:10.1016/j.gmit.2014.06.002) [Google Scholar]
- 25.Novak EA, Mollen KP. 2015. Mitochondrial dysfunction in inflammatory bowel disease. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 3, 62 (doi:10.3389/fcell.2015.00062) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.de la Cruz-Herrera CF, Campagna M, Lang V, del Carmen González-Santamaría J, Marcos-Villar L, Rodríguez MS, Vidal A, Collado M, Rivas C. 2015. SUMOylation regulates AKT1 activity. Oncogene 34, 1442–1450. (doi:10.1038/onc.2014.48) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Liu B, Shuai K. 2008. Targeting the PIAS1 SUMO ligase pathway to control inflammation. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 29, 505–509. (doi:10.1016/j.tips.2008.07.008) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Tomasi ML, Tomasi I, Ramani K, Pascale RM, Xu J, Giordano P, Mato JM, Lu SC. 2012. S-adenosyl methionine regulates ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme 9 protein expression and sumoylation in murine liver and human cancers. Hepatology 56, 982–993. (doi:10.1002/hep.25701) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Nava P, et al. 2010. Interferon-gamma regulates intestinal epithelial homeostasis through converging beta-catenin signaling pathways. Immunity 32, 392–402. (doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2010.03.001) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Huang W, et al. 2011. Coronin 2A mediates actin-dependent de-repression of inflammatory response genes. Nature 470, 414–418. (doi:10.1038/nature09703) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Fritah S, Lhocine N, Golebiowski F, Mounier J, Andrieux A, Jouvion G, Hay RT, Sansonetti P, Dejean A. 2014. Sumoylation controls host anti-bacterial response to the gut invasive pathogen Shigella flexneri. EMBO Rep. 15, 965–972. (doi:10.15252/embr.201338386) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Choi SJ, et al. 2006. Negative modulation of RXRalpha transcriptional activity by small ubiquitin-related modifier (SUMO) modification and its reversal by SUMO-specific protease SUSP1. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 30 669–30 677. (doi:10.1074/jbc.M604033200) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Akar CA, Feinstein DL. 2009. Modulation of inducible nitric oxide synthase expression by sumoylation. J. Neuroinflammation 6, 12 (doi:10.1186/1742-2094-6-12) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Yu B, et al. 2015. Oncogenesis driven by the Ras/Raf pathway requires the SUMO E2 ligase Ubc9. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, E1724–E1733. (doi:10.1073/pnas.1415569112) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Lee JH, Park SM, Kim OS, Lee CS, Woo JH, Park SJ, Joe E, Jou I. 2009. Differential SUMOylation of LXRalpha and LXRbeta mediates transrepression of STAT1 inflammatory signaling in IFN-γ-stimulated brain astrocytes. Mol. Cell 35, 806–817. (doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2009.07.021) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Kfoury Y, et al. 2011. Tax ubiquitylation and SUMOylation control the dynamic shuttling of Tax and NEMO between Ubc9 nuclear bodies and the centrosome. Blood 117, 190–199. (doi:10.1182/blood-2010-05-285742) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Martin N, Schwamborn K, Schreiber V, Werner A, Guillier C, Zhang X-D, Bischof O, Seeler J-S, Dejean A. 2009. PARP-1 transcriptional activity is regulated by sumoylation upon heat shock. EMBO J. 28, 3534–3548. (doi:10.1038/emboj.2009.279) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Decque A, et al. 2016. Sumoylation coordinates the repression of inflammatory and anti-viral gene-expression programs during innate sensing. Nat. Immunol. 17, 140–149. (doi:10.1038/ni.3342) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Garaude J, Farrás R, Bossis G, Charni S, Piechaczyk M, Hipskind RA, Villalba M. 2008. SUMOylation regulates the transcriptional activity of JunB in T lymphocytes. J. Immunol. 180, 5983–5990. (doi:10.4049/jimmunol.180.9.5983) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Zaph C, et al. 2007. Epithelial-cell-intrinsic IKK-β expression regulates intestinal immune homeostasis. Nature 446, 552–556. (doi:10.1038/nature05590) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Rimoldi M, Chieppa M, Vulcano M, Allavena P, Rescigno M. 2004. Intestinal epithelial cells control dendritic cell function. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 1029, 66–74. (doi:10.1196/annals.1309.009) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Watanabe T, Yamori M, Kita T, Chiba T, Wakatsuki Y. 2005. CD4+ CD25+ T cells regulate colonic localization of CD4 T cells reactive to a microbial antigen. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 11, 541–550. (doi:10.1097/01.MIB.0000163696.26969.e4) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Rimoldi M, et al. 2005. Intestinal immune homeostasis is regulated by the crosstalk between epithelial cells and dendritic cells. Nat. Immunol. 6, 507–514. (doi:10.1038/ni1192) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Altomare DA, Testa JR. 2005. Perturbations of the AKT signaling pathway in human cancer. Oncogene 24, 7455–7464. (doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1209085) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Chen WS, et al. 2001. Growth retardation and increased apoptosis in mice with homozygous disruption of the Akt1 gene. Genes Dev. 15, 2203–2208. (doi:10.1101/gad.913901) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Dummler B, Tschopp O, Hynx D, Yang Z-Z, Dirnhofer S, Hemmings BA. 2006. Life with a single isoform of Akt: mice lacking Akt2 and Akt3 are viable but display impaired glucose homeostasis and growth deficiencies. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26, 8042–8051. (doi:10.1128/MCB.00722-06) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Ding X, Wang A, Ma X, Demarque M, Jin W, Xin H, Dejean A, Dong C. 2016. Protein SUMOylation is required for regulatory T cell expansion and function. Cell Rep. 16, 1055–1066. (doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2016.06.056) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Arranz A, et al. 2012. Akt1 and Akt2 protein kinases differentially contribute to macrophage polarization. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 9517–9522. (doi:10.1073/pnas.1119038109) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Scharl M, Huber N, Lang S, Fürst A, Jehle E, Rogler G. 2015. Hallmarks of epithelial to mesenchymal transition are detectable in Crohn's disease associated intestinal fibrosis. Clin. Transl. Med. 4, 1 (doi:10.1186/s40169-015-0046-5) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Buffin-Meyer B, Crassous P-A, Delage C, Denis C, Schaak S, Paris H. 2007. EGF receptor transactivation and PI3-kinase mediate stimulation of ERK by α2A-adrenoreceptor in intestinal epithelial cells: a role in wound healing. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 574, 85–93. (doi:10.1016/j.ejphar.2007.07.014) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Liu X, et al. 2015. Knockdown of SUMO-activating enzyme subunit 2 (SAE2) suppresses cancer malignancy and enhances chemotherapy sensitivity in small cell lung cancer. J. Hematol. Oncol. 8, 67 (doi:10.1186/s13045-015-0164-y) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Göke M, Kanai M, Lynch-Devaney K, Podolsky DK. 1998. Rapid mitogen-activated protein kinase activation by transforming growth factor alpha in wounded rat intestinal epithelial cells. Gastroenterology 114, 697–705. (doi:10.1016/S0016-5085(98)70583-9) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Frey MR, Edelblum KL, Mullane MT, Liang D, Polk DB. 2009. The ErbB4 growth factor receptor is required for colon epithelial cell survival in the presence of TNF. Gastroenterology 136, 217–226. (doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2008.09.023) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All the data, code and material concerning the work are will be made publically available and are already provided within the manuscript. These are either part of the provided main dataset or the electronic supplementary material.