Abstract
Rational development of efficient photo-catalytic systems for hydrogen production requires understanding the catalytic mechanism and detailed information about the structure of intermediates in the catalytic cycle. We demonstrate how time-resolved X-ray absorption spectroscopy in the microsecond time range can be used to identify such intermediates and to determine their local geometric structure. This method was used to obtain the solution structure of the Co(I) intermediate of cobaloxime, which is a non-noble metal catalyst for solar hydrogen production from water. Distances between cobalt and nearest ligands including two solvent molecules and displacement of the cobalt atom out of plane formed by the planar ligands have been determined. Combining in situ X-ray absorption and UV-visible data, we demonstrate how slight modification of the catalyst structure can lead to the formation of a catalytically inactive Co(I) state under similar conditions. Possible deactivation mechanisms are discussed.
Keywords: Transient X-ray absorption, photocatalysis, XANES, X-ray absorption spectroscopy, solar fuel
Light-driven catalytic systems for hydrogen evolution from water are crucial components of our energy future.[1,2] Efficient photo-catalytic hydrogen evolution systems contain platinum nanoparticles or other noble metals that are expensive and of limited availability. This has triggered the development of catalysts based on earth-abundant 3d elements, such as cobalt, iron and nickel. [3–8] Cobaloximes are perspective and popular hydrogen evolving molecular catalysts[7–9] and they have been implemented in many homogeneous multicomponent photocatalytic systems.[7,10–16] The Co(III) complex [Co(dmgH)2pyCl] (Co1, dmgH2 = dimethylglyoxime, Scheme 1) with proton bridges between dmg2– ligands and the Co(II) complex [Co(dmgBF2)2L2] (Co2, L = H2O or CH3CN) with {BF2} bridges are the two most studied cobaloxime platforms so far. Rational optimization of such systems however depends on our understanding of the cobalt-based catalytic cycle, including the electronic and geometric structure of intermediates along the catalytic cycle and the possible routes that lead to deactivation.
Scheme 1.
Structure of cobaloxime catalysts Co1 and Co2 (L = H2O or CH3CN).
Different reaction mechanisms for hydrogen evolution have been proposed that involve homolysis [14,17,18] or protonation of a cobalt-hydride bond[17,19,20] They all involve a primary Co(I) intermediate which is then protonated to yield a Co(III)H hydride species. Such a Co(I) intermediate has been observed for an analogue of Co2, [Co(dpgBF2)2L2] (dpgH2 = diphenylglyoxime, L = CH3CN), by optical flash photolysis in the presence of the photosensitizer [Ru(bpy)3]2+ and methyl viologen (MV2+) as the electron relay.[21] The latter oxidatively quenches the excited state of the photosensitizer and delivers the electron to the catalyst (Fig. 1, top panel). In the absence of a sacrificial electron donor, charge recombination returns the system to its initial state. The solution structure of the Co(I) intermediate has been predicted using DFT,[17,20,22] but was never experimentally probed. A crystal structure of the Co(I) derivative [Co(dpgBF2)2(CH3CN)]– has been reported,[18] but the structure of the intermediate in solution can be significantly different from those in the solid phase. Here, we combine in situ time-resolved X-ray absorption near edge structure (XANES) spectroscopy and UV-visible spectroscopy to investigate the early stages of hydrogen evolution mediated by Co1 and Co2 catalysts. We report the first experimental determination of the structure of the Co(I) intermediate formed from Co2 in solution and highlight a major difference in terms of reactivity and stability between Co2 and Co1 under photo-catalytic conditions.
Figure 1.
Two reaction pathways leading to the formation of Co(I) intermediates. Top panel: transient formation of a Co(I) intermediate in the presence of an electron relay (ER) followed by recombination with the oxidized photosensitizer (PS). Bottom panel: accumulation of Co(I) species in the presence of a sacrificial electron donor (D).
XANES spectra contain element-specific information about the structure of metal complexes.[23–25] Time-resolved X-ray absorption spectroscopy in the laser pump-X-ray probe mode was initially established for experiments in the picosecond - nanosecond time range[26,27]. We recently extended the technique to the microsecond range (pump-sequential-probes[28] and pump-flow-probe[29] methods, see SI). These new setups coupled with state of the art simulations enables establishing the time-resolved XANES as a powerful tool to study the local structure of catalytic intermediates in light-driven reactions[23].
The transiently formed Co(I) intermediate (Fig. 1, top) was monitored using time-resolved Co K-edge XANES. The sample consisted of Co2, [Ru(bpy)3]2+ and MV2+ in acetonitrile. NBu4PF6 (0.1 M) was added to control ion pairing and the ionic strength of the solution. A series of 200 Co K-edge XANES spectra corresponding to the time range (-50, 50) μs has been collected using the pump-sequential-probes method[28]. Analysis of these spectra using principal component analysis (PCA)[30,31] indicated that only one intermediate is present in this time series. This intermediate is formed within the first microsecond after the excitation of the photosensitizer. Figure 2 displays the spectrum of Co2 in its initial Co(II) state (top panel) and the component corresponding to the transiently formed intermediate (bottom panel, blue line). To access longer delays we performed the experiment on the same system using the pump-flow-probe method[29]. A similar transient signal was measured at 100 μs delay (Fig. 2, magenta line). The positive signal of the transient XANES in the region of the rising edge (7715-7730 eV) is indicative of cobalt reduction. Thus Co(I) is the only intermediate that is formed transiently in this multicomponent system over the timeframe 0.5-100 μs. The formation of a Co(III) species[21] from the reaction of oxidized photosensitizer [Ru(bpy)3]3+ and Co2 was not observed.
Figure 2.
Top panel: Experimental Co K-edge XANES of the initial Co(II) state of Co2 in acetonitrile. Bottom panel: Transient Co K-edge XANES spectrum corresponding to 100 μs delay after laser excitation (magenta line) of a [Ru(bpy)3]2+/MV2+/Co2 system in a pump-flow-probe setup; transient Co K-edge XANES extracted using PCA from the series of 200 spectra measured on the same system in the time range (-50, 50) μs (blue line) with regard to the laser pulse in a pump-sequencial-probe setup; the difference between the spectrum of the Co(I) state accumulated for a system containing Co1 and Eosin Y in the presence of TEOA as the sacrificial electron donor and the corresponding spectrum of Co(II) in acetonitrile (black line). The spectrum obtained using pump-flow-probe method was multiplied by 2.5 and shifted up, while the spectrum measured at accumulative conditions was divided by 21 and shifted down to simplify visual comparison.
Accumulation of Co(I) in the presence of a sacrificial electron donor (Fig. 1, bottom) has been monitored using in situ UV-visible spectroscopy. The systems contained CH3CN solutions of Co2, triethanolamine (TEOA), [Ir(ppy)2(bpy)]+ (ppy = phenylpyridine) or Eosin Y as photosensitizer and NBu4PF6 (0.1 M). The formation of Co(I) state of Co2 is evidenced by the characteristic two-band spectrum with maxima at 556 and 627 nm (Figure 3 and S6). The spectrum is in agreement with the references obtained for electrosynthetically[32] and chemically reduced[19] Co(I) derivatives of Co2 and with ab initio calculations.[22] Results are similar to those reported using a platinum-based photosensitizer[11] and to those observed in the microsecond range at transient conditions for [Co(dpgBF2)2(CH3CN)2].[21] Hydrogen is evolved under accumulation conditions which agrees with previous report.[11] Thus Co(I) intermediates of Co2 formed either transiently or under photoaccumulation conditions are identical and active for hydrogen evolution.
Figure 3.
UV-Vis spectra recorded before (black line) and after 30 s (red line), 1 minute (blue line), 2.5 minutes (green line) and 5 minites (magenta line) of visible light irradiation on anhydrous CH3CN solutions of Co2 and [Ir(ppy)2(bpy)](PF6) in the presence of TEOA (5 %). The transition Co(II) → Co(I) is outlined by the appearance of a two-component signal.
Theoretical modelling of the XANES spectra for Co2 and the transiently formed Co(I) intermediate allows to determine their structure in solution. Two parameters were varied for Co2: the average distance between cobalt and nitrogen atoms in dmg2– ligands (defined as rigid groups) and the bond length between cobalt and axial nitrogen atoms of the CH3CN molecules. For the Co(I) intermediate state we similarly varied the average distance between the cobalt center and nitrogen atoms of dmg2– ligands and allowed variations in the distances between cobalt and axial ligands independently in opposite directions, i.e. not excluding a transition from a six-coordinated towards a five-coordinated model. Additionally the displacement of the cobalt atom out of plane formed by nitrogen atoms of dmg2– has been included into the model. The best simulated spectra for the Co(II) and the Co(I) species are compared with the experimental data in Fig. 4. The model of Co(II) is characterized by a Co-N(dmg2–) bond length of 1.86 Å while the Co-N(CH3CN) distance is 2.02 Å. For the Co(I) intermediate the best fitted Co-N(dmg2–) bond distance is 1.88 Å, the Co-N(CH3CN) distances are 2.00 Å and 2.11 Å and the out of plane cobalt displacement is 0.08 Å. Thus one of the axial bonds remains unchanged from the initial Co(II) state while the other axial bond becomes slightly weaker. This model is thus at variance with previous DFT calculations for the Co(I) state of Co2, where the authors suggested either a four-coordinated[20] or five-coordinated[17] structure. It is also different from the five-coordinated structure of [CoI(dpgBF2)2(CH3CN)2]– determined from single crystal XRD.[18] Neither the full displacement of one axial ligand, nor the DFT-predicted significant (by ~0.2 Å) shortening of one of the metal-solvent bonds has been observed upon reduction from Co(II) to Co(I).[17],[20]
Figure 4.
Top panel: comparison of the experimental Co K-edge XANES of Co2 in acetonitrile (black line) with the theoretical simulation for the best-fit structure (red line). Bottom: transient signal corresponding to the formation of Co(I) intermediate. Experimental (black line) and theoretical calculations (red line) for the best-fit model are shown.
We then investigated the other cobaloxime catalyst, Co1. We collected a Co K-edge XANES of the Co(I) state accumulated in solution in the presence of a sacrificial electron donor (TEOA). Eosin Y was used as the photosensitizer. During the first minutes of light illumination, the spectrum of the initial Co(III) complex evolved towards reduction and after approximately 15 minutes a stable signal was obtained. The absorption edge shifts to lower energies than in the Co(II) state indicating lower oxidation state of metal. The difference between the spectrum obtained under these conditions and that of cobaloxime in the Co(II) state is shown as a black trace in the bottom panel of Figure 2. Its shape is significantly different from the transient signal observed in the time-resolved experiment using the Co2 catalyst and assigned above to a Co(I) intermediate. In particular the first positive peak is shifted by 5 eV to higher energies relative to the corresponding maximum of the time-resolved signal. This indicates that the structure of such an accumulated state is significantly different from that of the transiently formed Co(I) intermediate.
UV-visible monitoring of the same solution confirmed these observations. A transition from the Co(III) to the Co(II) state was first observed as a new absorption band at ~430 nm, assigned to a d-d transition for the d7 Co(II) ion (Fig. S7 and S8). However neither typical signatures of the Co(I) state nor the hydrogen evolution were observed upon longer irradiation. Further investigations indicated that water is required to observe both the typical signal of a Co(I) intermediate and hydrogen evolution (Fig. S9 and previous reports[12,15]). Thus both Co K-edge XANES and UV-vis measurements indicate that the Co(I) state accumulated during long-term irradiation in the presence of a sacrificial electron donor with Co1 is different from the transiently formed Co(I) intermediate observed with Co2.
The Co1 and Co2 systems differ by the bridge between oxime functions in the equatorial plane and by the presence of an axial pyridine ligand in Co1. To discriminate between these two differences, we prepared [Co(dmgBF2)2pyCl] (Co3) (synthesis is described in SI) and monitored UV-visible spectra under similar photo-catalytic conditions. Co(I) intermediate with two-band spectrum (identical to that observed for Co2) was found (Fig. S10). Pyridine is a stronger ligand than TEOA that excludes that a coordination bond between TEOA or its decomposition product and the cobalt could be responsible for the difference observed in the Co(I) states in the above experiments. XANES spectra show such an interaction between sacrificial electron donor and Co2 in the Co(II) state (Fig. S5). However, the amplitude of the spectral changes at the rising edge of XANES (7715-7730 eV) is much smaller than the difference observed between the accumulated and transiently formed Co(I) species at similar energies. The difference in behavior between Co2 and Co1 may thus be assigned to the nature of the bridge in the equatorial planes. Simulations indicate that the bridge between dmg2– ligands does not influence the shape of XANES spectra significantly (Fig. S4) and therefore more severe modifications have to be found to explain this spectral difference.
Substituting the proton for {BF2} bridges cathodically shifts the Co(II/I) potential by 500 mV[33] and significantly increases the nucleophilicity of the Co(I) center. We thus expected the Co(I) intermediate of Co1 to rapidly react with any source of protons in the medium, and specifically with the protons released by TEOA upon oxidation. Our data however show that this system is unable to evolve hydrogen, probably because of the limited amount of available protons and the quite basic conditions of the medium. Instead it may degrade through hydride transfer to the dmgH– ligand.[34,35] Alternatively, the initial Co(I) intermediate may react with an iminium species resulting from the decomposition of TEOA and generate a Co(III)-alkyl species.[36] In both cases, the resulting Co(III) species can be reduced to the Co(I) state through light-driven electron transfers. However, due to the significant modification of their electronic structure, it is unlikely that the corresponding Co(I) species exhibits absorption bands in the 550-650 nm region corresponding to transitions from a metal d orbital to π orbitals delocalized over imine bonds.[22] Such severe modifications are also in line with the major difference observed in the Co K-edge XANES spectrum (Fig. 2) and the lack of hydrogen evolution activity observed for the accumulated Co(I) state of Co1.
In conclusion, we presented the first structural determination of intermediates of photo-catalytic systems observed in the microsecond range using time-resolved XANES. The solution structure of Co(I) intermediate of Co2 indicates that only one axial solvent ligand of the cobalt center is labilized, but not fully displaced as it is observed in the solid state. While such a Co(I) intermediate is the resting state of the Co2-based photo-catalytic system, we showed that another catalytically inactive Co(I) species forms under similar conditions when Co1 is used as the catalytic platform. Further work can be focused on the other intermediates (in particular Co(III)H) of cobaloxime catalysts. Time-resolved XANES method that has been illustrated in this work can be generally applied to clarify the photo-catalytic mechanism not only for hydrogen evolving systems but also for other molecular photo-catalysts.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant nr 200021-135226), European Commission's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement n.° 290605 (COFUND: PSI-FELLOW) and ERC Grant Agreement n.306398, the French National Research Agency (Labex program, ARCANE, ANR-11-LABX-0003-01) and Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project #14-02-31555). JAvB thanks the NCCR MUST. The COST Action CM1202 PERSPECT-H2O is also acknowledged.
References
- [1].Balzani V, Credi A, Venturi M. ChemSusChem. 2008;1:26–58. doi: 10.1002/cssc.200700087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].Thapper A, Styring S, Saracco G, Rutherford AW, Robert B, Magnuson A, Lubitz W, Llobet A, Kurz P, Holzwarth A, et al. Green. 2013;3:43–57. [Google Scholar]
- [3].McKone JR, Marinescu SC, Brunschwig BS, Winkler JR, Gray HB. Chem Sci. 2014;5:865–878. [Google Scholar]
- [4].Han Z, Eisenberg R. Acc Chem Res. 2014;47:2537–2544. doi: 10.1021/ar5001605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Thoi VS, Sun Y, Long JR, Chang CJ. Chem Soc Rev. 2013;42:2388–2400. doi: 10.1039/c2cs35272a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Du P, Eisenberg R. Energy Environ Sci. 2012;5:6012–6021. [Google Scholar]
- [7].Artero V, Chavarot-Kerlidou M, Fontecave M. Angew Chem-Int Ed. 2011;50:7238–7266. doi: 10.1002/anie.201007987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].Losse S, Vos JG, Rau S. Coord Chem Rev. 2010;254:2492–2504. [Google Scholar]
- [9].Dempsey JL, Brunschwig BS, Winkler JR, Gray HB. Acc Chem Res. 2009;42:1995–2004. doi: 10.1021/ar900253e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Fihri A, Artero V, Pereira A, Fontecave M. Dalton Trans. 2008:5567–5569. doi: 10.1039/b812605b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Du P, Schneider J, Luo G, Brennessel WW, Eisenberg R. Inorg Chem. 2009;48:4952–4962. doi: 10.1021/ic900389z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Du P, Knowles K, Eisenberg R. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:12576–12577. doi: 10.1021/ja804650g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].a) Probst B, Rodenberg A, Guttentag M, Hamm P, Alberto R. Inorg Chem. 2010;49:6453–6460. doi: 10.1021/ic100036v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Zhang P, Wang M, Dong J, Li X, Wang F, Wu L, Sun L. J Phys Chem C. 2010;114:15868–15874. [Google Scholar]; c) McCormick TM, Calitree BD, Orchard A, Kraut ND, Bright FV, Detty MR, Eisenberg R. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:15480–15483. doi: 10.1021/ja1057357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Probst B, Kolano C, Hamm P, Alberto R. Inorg Chem. 2009;48:1836–1843. doi: 10.1021/ic8013255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15] [16].Khnayzer RS, McCusker CE, Olaiya BS, Castellano FN. J Am Chem Soc. 2013;135:14068–14070. doi: 10.1021/ja407816f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17].Solis BH, Hammes-Schiffer S. Inorg Chem. 2011;50:11252–11262. doi: 10.1021/ic201842v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].Hu X, Brunschwig BS, Peters JC. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129:8988–8998. doi: 10.1021/ja067876b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19].Dempsey JL, Winkler JR, Gray HB. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:16774–16776. doi: 10.1021/ja109351h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20].Muckerman JT, Fujita E. Chem Commun. 2011;47:12456–12458. doi: 10.1039/c1cc15330g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [21].Dempsey JL, Winkler JR, Gray HB. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:1060–1065. doi: 10.1021/ja9080259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [22].Bhattacharjee A, Chavarot-Kerlidou M, Dempsey JL, Gray HB, Fujita E, Muckerman JT, Fontecave M, Artero V, Arantes GM, Field MJ. ChemPhysChem. 2014;15:2951–2958. doi: 10.1002/cphc.201402398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [23].Smolentsev G, Sundström V. Coord Chem Rev. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2015.03.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [24].Bordiga S, Groppo E, Agostini G, van Bokhoven JA, Lamberti C. Chem Rev. 2013;113:1736–1850. doi: 10.1021/cr2000898. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [25].Ortega R, Carmona A, Llorens I, Solari PL. J Anal At Spectrom. 2012;27:2054–2065. [Google Scholar]
- [26].Bressler C, Chergui M. Annu Rev Phys Chem. 2010;61:263–282. doi: 10.1146/annurev.physchem.012809.103353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [27].Chen LX, Zhang X, Lockard JV, Stickrath AB, Attenkofer K, Jennings G, Liu DJ. Acta Crystallogr A. 2010;66:240–251. doi: 10.1107/S0108767309051496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [28].Smolentsev G, Guda AA, Janousch M, Frieh C, Jud G, Zamponi F, Chavarot-Kerlidou M, Artero V, van Bokhoven JA, Nachtegaal M. Faraday Discuss. 2014;171:259–273. doi: 10.1039/c4fd00035h. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [29].Smolentsev G, Guda A, Zhang X, Haldrup K, Andreiadis ES, Chavarot-Kerlidou M, Canton SE, Nachtegaal M, Artero V, Sundstrom V. J Phys Chem C. 2013;117:17367–17375. doi: 10.1021/jp4010554. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [30].Smolentsev G, Guilera G, Tromp M, Pascarelli S, Soldatov AV. J Chem Phys. 2009;130:174508. doi: 10.1063/1.3125940. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [31].Malinowski ER. Factor Analysis in Chemistry. Wiley; New York: 2002. [Google Scholar]
- [32].Estes DP, Grills DC, Norton JR. J Am Chem Soc. 2014;136:17362–17365. doi: 10.1021/ja508200g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [33].Baffert C, Artero V, Fontecave M. Inorg Chem. 2007;46:1817–1824. doi: 10.1021/ic061625m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [34].Simándi LI, Budó-Záhonyi É, Szeverényi Z. Inorg Nucl Chem Lett. 1976;12:237–241. [Google Scholar]
- [35].Simándi LI, Szeverényi Z, Budó-Záhonyi É. Inorg Nucl Chem Lett. 1975;11:773–777. [Google Scholar]
- [36].Rodenberg A, Orazietti M, Probst B, Bachmann C, Alberto R, Baldridge KK, Hamm P. Inorg Chem. 2014;54:646–657. doi: 10.1021/ic502591a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.





