Skip to main content
Oncology Letters logoLink to Oncology Letters
. 2017 May 17;14(1):1167–1171. doi: 10.3892/ol.2017.6181

Diagnostic clue of nodular fasciitis mimicking metastasis in papillary thyroid cancer, mismatching findings on 18F-FDG PET/CT and 123I whole body scan: A case report

Minjung Seo 1, Misung Kim 2, Eun Sook Kim 3, Hongbo Sim 4, Sungmin Jun 5, Seol Hoon Park 1,
PMCID: PMC5494682  PMID: 28693291

Abstract

This study reports a case of nodular fasciitis incidentally detected in a patient with papillary thyroid cancer. A 47-year-old woman underwent a total thyroidectomy and radioactive iodine therapy for papillary thyroid cancer. On a follow-up fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET/computed tomography (CT) scan after 12 months, a focal 18F-FDG-avid lesion was incidentally detected in the paraspinal muscle. It was well-enhanced on CT and magnetic resonance imaging, indicating metastasis. However, the lesion was not iodine avid on the 123I whole body scan, which favored benign etiology over metastasis from thyroid cancer. For pathological confirmation, surgical excision was performed and the paraspinal lesion was finally confirmed as nodular fasciitis. Therefore, it was suggested that nodular fasciitis may be included in the differential diagnosis of a 18F-FDG avid/iodine non-avid soft tissue lesion in patients with thyroid cancer. In such circumstances, 123I whole body scans may serve a role in non-invasive work-up, and prevent unnecessary surgical procedures.

Keywords: nodular fasciitis, thyroid cancer, radioactive iodine, fluorodeoxyglucose, positron emission tomography, whole body scan

Introduction

Nodular fasciitis is a benign soft tissue tumor that is characterized by the proliferation of fibroblasts and myofibroblasts in the deep subcutaneous layer, as well as the muscular fascia (1). Its occurrence is common in the upper extremities of young to middle aged adults and is equal in distribution among men and women. Its risk factors remain unknown and it is often mistaken for soft tissue malignancy or metastasis (2,3). Complete excision is currently the gold standard for diagnosis and treatment. Nodular fasciitis exhibits good prognosis with a low recurrence rate and thus, is considered benign (3). There are few case reports on the clinical implications of nodular fasciitis using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT), in which 18F-FDG uptake was distributed to areas of rich cellularity and high mitotic activity (4,5). The present study exhibits a case of nodular fasciitis incidentally detected on 18F-FDG PET/CT in a patient followed up for papillary thyroid cancer (PTC).

Case report

A 47-year-old woman was diagnosed with PTC and was admitted to Ulsan University Hospital (Ulsan, Republic of Korea) in March 2013 for a total thyroidectomy. The final pathological stage was T3N1b in accordance with the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system (6), with a size of 0.9×0.9×0.8 cm extending to the perithyroidal soft tissue with a clear resection margin and no lymphovascular invasion, and 9 lymph node metastases in the left cervical levels II–IV. Radioactive iodine therapy of 150 mCi was performed.

A 12-month follow-up using 18F-FDG PET/CT revealed an unexpected focal 18F-FDG-avid lesion (SUVmax, 9.8) in the left paraspinal muscle at the T3 level (Fig. 1A and B). Enhanced chest CT and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were performed to evaluate the possibility of metastasis. The two modalities showed a well-enhanced nodule of 9 mm, indicative of metastasis (Fig. 1C and D). No abnormalities were observed in the laboratory findings at that time. The levels of thyroid stimulating hormone, thyroglobulin (Tg), thyroxine (T4) and anti-Tg antibodies measured using chemiluminescence immunoassays were 0.017 µIU/ml, <0.1 ng/ml, 1.85 ng/dl and <20 IU/ml, respectively. An 123I diagnostic whole body scan, which was performed to exclude metastasis from thyroid cancer, showed no abnormal iodine uptake in the left upper back (Fig. 2). These findings favored a benign condition over metastasis. The level of stimulated Tg at this time was 0.89 ng/ml.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT shows a focal hypermetabolic lesion in the left paraspinal muscle at the level of T3 on (A) maximum intensity (black arrow) and (B) axial fused PET/CT images (white arrow). (C) Enhanced CT and (D) magnetic resonance imaging show a well-demarcated nodule with enhancement (white arrowhead). PET, positron emission tomography; CT, computed tomography.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

123I diagnostic whole body scan shows no abnormal iodine uptake associating with the hypermetabolic lesion in the left paraspinal muscle. Focal iodine uptakes in the major salivary gland areas, nasal cavity, upper abdomen and pelvic cavity are presumed to result from physiological activities.

Surgical excision was performed and the pathological diagnosis was nodular fasciitis. The gross pathological specimen was a 1.7×1.1 cm well demarcated firm mass (Fig. 3). Following hematoxylin and eosin staining, the specimen was observed under a light microscope (Olympus BX51; Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). Spindle cells were identified to be arranged in storiform fascicles and normal mitotic figures were present (Fig. 3). Immunohistochemical analysis for CD68 (cat. no. M0876; dilution, 1:200; Dako; Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA), smooth muscle actin (cat. no. 18-0106; dilution, 1:250; Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA), CD34 (cat. no. MS-363-P; dilution, 1:1,000; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) and S-100 protein (cat. no. LCL-L-S100P; dilution, 1:1,000; Novocastra; Leica Biosystems GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) were performed on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded 4 µm-thick tissue sections using Bond-Max with a Bond Polymer Refine Detection kit (Leica Biosystems GmbH) according to the manufacturers protocol. All antigen vs. antibody reactions were performed with a Bond Polymer Refine Detection kit (Leica Biosystems GmbH), and non-specific binding was blocked by the hydrogen peroxide in the kit according to the protocol of the manufacturer. The specimen exhibited positive expression levels of CD68 (Fig. 4A) and smooth muscle actin (Fig. 4B), while CD34 (Fig. 4C) and S-100 (Fig. 4D) proteins were not expressed (Fig. 4).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

(A) Gross inspection of the pathological specimen shows a well-demarcated, firm soft tissue mass of 1.7×1.1 cm, with a tan white, solid and smooth cut surface. Tissue sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin and magnified by (B) ×20, (C) ×100 and (D) ×400. The specimen is partially encapsulated with focal capsular infiltration and is composed of spindle cells. The tumor cells are arranged in storiform fascicles. The uniform plump tumor cells with pale nuclei show normal mitotic figures in the image magnified by ×400.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Pathological specimens exhibit positive expression levels of (A) CD68 and (B) smooth muscle actin following immunohistochemical analysis. (C) CD34 and (D) S-100 proteins are not expressed (magnification, ×200).

No additional treatment was performed. At a 9-month follow-up post-excision, the patient was disease-free, with an unstimulated Tg level of <0.01 ng/ml.

Discussion

This is a case of nodular fasciitis, which was mistaken for muscle metastasis, in a patient being followed up for PTC.

The majority of thyroid cancers are localized at the time of diagnosis with only a small proportion (10–35%), depending on the histology, presenting with distant metastasis (7,8). This proportion is only 4–15% in the case of differentiated thyroid cancers (7,8). Common sites of metastasis include the lungs and bones (811), while soft tissue metastasis is reportedly extremely rare (1214). Although distant metastasis in patients with thyroid cancer is not as grave as that in other cancers, it significantly affects survival; therefore, a thorough work-up including 18F-FDG PET/CT is required (9,15,16).

18F-FDG PET/CT visualizes glucose metabolism and is widely used to differentiate between benign and malignant lesions, as well as to stage/restage various malignances (1722). In a number of cases, the intensity of FDG accumulation is used to differentiate between malignant and benign lesions (2326). However, numerous other benign conditions, including abscess, pulmonary granuloma, tuberculosis and sarcoidosis, may also present with increased 18F-FDG uptake (23,2732). Thus, there is a high chance of encountering false-positive conditions in a clinical setting.

The patient in the present case showed a focal 18F-FDG avid lesion that did not show abnormal iodine uptake, and the patient exhibited a low stimulated Tg level. The differential diagnosis in this case includes primary (such as schwannoma, dermatofibroma and sarcoma) and metastatic (from dedifferentiated thyroid cancer or other malignancies) tumors (33,34). The 18F-FDG avid lesion in the current patient turned out to be nodular fasciitis.

Nodular fasciitis is a benign condition, which shows proliferating fibroblasts in the deep subcutaneous layer or the muscular fascia (35). Nodular fasciitis is occasionally clinically mistaken for soft tissue sarcoma. If there is infiltration of mitotically active spindle cell lesions in the connective tissue (35), pathological diagnosis is difficult. The lesion commonly occurs in the first 3 decades of life, with the upper extremities and the trunk being the most commonly affected anatomical sites (36,37). Lesions usually present as oval nodules with poorly- or well-defined margins, and occasionally microlobulation on CT, MRI and ultrasonography (US) (1,38,39). Lesions show mixed but overall hypoechoic echogenicity on US, as well as variable but typically diffuse contrast enhancement on MRI (1,38,39). Although surgical excision is curative, it usually shows spontaneous involution and is self-limiting (40).

The present case is in agreement with other case reports that describe 18F-FDG-avid nodular fasciitis (4,5,33). The high 18F-FDG uptake in nodular fasciitis may be due to its histological characteristics that are also present in malignancy. These include rapid growth, rich cellularity and high mitotic activity (4,5). Thus, nodular fasciitis is hard to diagnose and the high 18F-FDG uptake may be a limitation of 18F-FDG PET/CT as it mimics malignancy, as in other radiological and pathological modalities as above mentioned (2,3,3437). To the best of our knowledge, there are no studies on nodular fasciitis mimicking metastasis in PTC. However, since nodular fasciitis exhibited high FDG avidity in the present case, metastasis of PTC could not be excluded and additional diagnostic work-up was necessary. The present histological findings were similar to those aforementioned.

In the present case, the 18F-FDG-avid paraspinal lesion was excised, since the imaging modalities showed findings indicative of soft tissue metastasis. When the lesion was retrospectively reviewed, it had an increased probability of being a primary soft tissue lesion compared with metastasis from thyroid cancer, partly as the patient had a relatively low level of stimulated Tg (0.89 ng/ml) and the 123I whole body scan showed negative iodine uptake. Although these findings may also be shown in the case of a poorly-differentiated metastatic lesion, soft tissue metastasis from thyroid cancer, which is considered a manifestation of a terminal stage, is rare and is usually accompanied by multiple metastases in other sites.

In summary, the present study reported a case of nodular fasciitis with FDG avidity in a patient with thyroid cancer. Nodular fasciitis may be included in the differential diagnosis of an 18F-FDG-avid and iodine non-avid paraspinal soft tissue lesion, when clinical probability of distant metastasis is low. In such circumstances of patients with thyroid cancer, unnecessary surgical procedures may be prevented using a 123I whole body scan as a part of non-invasive work-up.

References

  • 1.Kim ST, Kim HJ, Park SW, Baek CH, Byun HS, Kim YM. Nodular fasciitis in the head and neck: CT and MR imaging findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005;26:2617–2623. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Rhee SJ, Ryu JK, Kim JH, Lim SJ. Nodular fasciitis of the breast: Two cases with a review of imaging findings. Clin Imaging. 2014;38:730–733. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2014.04.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kessels LW, Simsek S, van Hattum AH, Stam F, Comans EF. Nodular fasciitis: An unexpected finding on computed tomography and positron emission tomography. Eur J Intern Med. 2004;15:183–185. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2004.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kim JY, Park J, Choi YY, Lee S, Paik SS. Nodular fasciitis mimicking soft tissue metastasis on 18F-FDG PET/CT during surveillance. Clin Nucl Med. 2015;40:172–174. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000000559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wang KB, Tsai SC, Chen YC. A possible musculoskeletal pitfall in 18F-FDG PET: Nodular fasciitis. Ann Nucl Med Sci. 2010;23:165–168. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Edge SB, Compton CC. The American joint committee on cancer: The 7th edition of the ajcc cancer staging manual and the future of TNM. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:1471–1474. doi: 10.1245/s10434-010-0985-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Shaha AR, Ferlito A, Rinaldo A. Distant metastases from thyroid and parathyroid cancer. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2001;63:243–249. doi: 10.1159/000055749. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Song HJ, Xue YL, Xu YH, Qiu ZL, Luo QY. Rare metastases of differentiated thyroid carcinoma: Pictorial review. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2011;18:R165–R174. doi: 10.1530/ERC-11-0068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Clark JR, Lai P, Hall F, Borglund A, Eski S, Freeman JL. Variables predicting distant metastases in thyroid cancer. Laryngoscope. 2005;115:661–667. doi: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000161337.46892.e0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Schlumberger M, Tubiana M, De Vathaire F, Hill C, Gardet P, Travagli JP, Fragu P, Lumbroso J, Caillou B, Parmentier C. Long-term results of treatment of 283 patients with lung and bone metastases from differentiated thyroid carcinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1986;63:960–967. doi: 10.1210/jcem-63-4-960. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ruegemer JJ, Hay ID, Bergstralh EJ, Ryan JJ, Offord KP, Gorman CA. Distant metastases in differentiated thyroid carcinoma: A multivariate analysis of prognostic variables. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1988;67:501–508. doi: 10.1210/jcem-67-3-501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sevinc A, Buyukberber S, Sari R, Baysal T, Mizrak B. Follicular thyroid cancer presenting initially with soft tissue metastasis. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2000;30:27–29. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyd007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Califano I, Quildrian S, Coduti M, Bilbao E Rojas, Otero J, Califano L. Soft tissue metastases from differentiated thyroid cancer diagnosed by 18F FDG PET-CT. Arq Bras Endocrinol Metabol. 2013;57:317–321. doi: 10.1590/S0004-27302013000400007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Rodrigues G, Ghosh A. Synchronous bony and soft tissue metastases from follicular carcinoma of the thyroid. J Korean Med Sci. 2003;18:914–916. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2003.18.6.914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Shaha AR, Shah JP, Loree TR. Differentiated thyroid cancer presenting initially with distant metastasis. Am J Surg. 1997;174:474–476. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9610(97)00158-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Durante C, Haddy N, Baudin E, Leboulleux S, Hartl D, Travagli JP, Caillou B, Ricard M, Lumbroso JD, De Vathaire F, Schlumberger M. Long-term outcome of 444 patients with distant metastases from papillary and follicular thyroid carcinoma: Benefits and limits of radioiodine therapy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91:2892–2899. doi: 10.1210/jc.2005-2838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Asagi A, Ohta K, Nasu J, Tanada M, Nadano S, Nishimura R, Teramoto N, Yamamoto K, Inoue T, Iguchi H. Utility of contrast-enhanced FDG-PET/CT in the clinical management of pancreatic cancer: Impact on diagnosis, staging, evaluation of treatment response and detection of recurrence. Pancreas. 2013;42:11–19. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0b013e3182550d77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Groheux D, Hindié E, Marty M, Espié M, Rubello D, Vercellino L, Bousquet G, Ohnona J, Toubert ME, Merlet P, Misset JL. 18F-FDG-PET/CT in staging, restaging, and treatment response assessment of male breast cancer. Eur J Radiol. 2014;83:1925–1933. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.05.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Cayvarli H, Bekis R, Akman T, Altun D. The role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of gastric cancer recurrence. Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther. 2014;23:76–83. doi: 10.4274/mirt.83803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.de Geus-Oei LF, Vriens D, van Laarhoven HW, van der Graaf WT, Oyen WJ. Monitoring and predicting response to therapy with 18F-FDG PET in colorectal cancer: A systematic review. J Nucl Med. 2009;50(Suppl 1):43S–54S. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.108.057224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Bestic JM, Peterson JJ, Bancroft LW. Pediatric FDG PET/CT: Physiologic uptake, normal variants, and benign conditions (corrected) Radiographics. 2009;29:1487–1500. doi: 10.1148/rg.295095024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Wahl RL. Current status of PET in breast cancer imaging, staging, and therapy. Semin Roentgenol. 2001;36:250–260. doi: 10.1053/sroe.2001.25126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Aoki J, Watanabe H, Shinozaki T, Takagishi K, Ishijima H, Oya N, Sato N, Inoue T, Endo K. FDG PET of primary benign and malignant bone tumors: Standardized uptake value in 52 lesions. Radiology. 2001;219:774–777. doi: 10.1148/radiology.219.3.r01ma08774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Keyes JW., Jr SUV: Standard uptake or silly useless value? J Nucl Med. 1995;36:1836–1839. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Visser EP, Boerman OC, Oyen WJ. SUV: From silly useless value to smart uptake value. J Nucl Med. 2010;51:173–175. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.109.068411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Hu SL, Yang ZY, Zhou ZR, Yu XJ, Ping B, Zhang YJ. Role of SUV(max) obtained by 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with a solitary pancreatic lesion: Predicting malignant potential and proliferation. Nucl Med Commun. 2013;34:533–539. doi: 10.1097/MNM.0b013e328360668a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Park SA, Lee KM, Choi U, Kim HS, Kim HW, Song JH. Normal physiologic and benign foci with F-18 FDG avidity on PET/CT in patients with breast cancer. Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010;44:282–289. doi: 10.1007/s13139-010-0055-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Tahara T, Ichiya Y, Kuwabara Y, Otsuka M, Miyake Y, Gunasekera R, Masuda K. High [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in abdominal abscesses: A PET study. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1989;13:829–831. doi: 10.1097/00004728-198909000-00014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Meyer MA, Frey KA, Schwaiger M. Discordance between F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose uptake and contrast enhancement in a brain abscess. Clin Nucl Med. 1993;18:682–684. doi: 10.1097/00003072-199308000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Slosman DO, Spiliopoulos A, Keller A, Lemoine R, Besse F, Couson F, Townsend D, Rochat T. Quantitative metabolic PET imaging of a plasma cell granuloma. J Thorac Imaging. 1994;9:116–119. doi: 10.1097/00005382-199421000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Patz EF, Jr, Lowe VJ, Hoffman JM, Paine SS, Burrowes P, Coleman RE, Goodman PC. Focal pulmonary abnormalities: Evaluation with F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET scanning. Radiology. 1993;188:487–490. doi: 10.1148/radiology.188.2.8327702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Lewis PJ, Salama A. Uptake of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose in sarcoidosis. J Nucl Med. 1994;35:1647–1649. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Demir MK, Ozdemir H, Gençhallaç H, Altaner S, Kartal O. Dermatofibroma mimicking malignancy on integrated F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET-CT. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2009;15:61–63. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.de Waele M, Carp L, Lauwers P, Hendriks J, De Maeseneer M, Van Schil P, Blockx P. Paravertebral schwannoma with high uptake of fluorodeoxyglucose on positron emission tomography. Acta Chir Belg. 2005;105:537–538. doi: 10.1080/00015458.2005.11679777. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Zuber TJ, Finley JL. Nodular fasciitis. South Med J. 1994;87:842–844. doi: 10.1097/00007611-199408000-00020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Konwaler BE, Keasbey L, Kaplan L. Subcutaneous pseudosarcomatous fibromatosis (fasciitis) Am J Clin Pathol. 1955;25:241–252. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/25.3.241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Pandian TK, Zeidan MM, Ibrahim KA, Moir CR, Ishitani MB, Zarroug AE. Nodular fasciitis in the pediatric population: A single center experience. J Pediatr Surg. 2013;48:1486–1489. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2012.12.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Khuu A, Yablon CM, Jacobson JA, Inyang A, Lucas DR, Biermann JS. Nodular fasciitis: Characteristic imaging features on sonography and magnetic resonance imaging. J Ultrasound Med. 2014;33:565–573. doi: 10.7863/ultra.33.4.565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Dinauer PA, Brixey CJ, Moncur JT, Fanburg-Smith JC, Murphey MD. Pathologic and MR imaging features of benign fibrous soft-tissue tumors in adults. Radiographics. 2007;27:173–187. doi: 10.1148/rg.271065065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Kong CS, Cha I. Nodular fasciitis: Diagnosis by fine needle aspiration biopsy. Acta Cytol. 2004;48:473–477. doi: 10.1159/000326406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Oncology Letters are provided here courtesy of Spandidos Publications

RESOURCES