Skip to main content
Journal of Global Oncology logoLink to Journal of Global Oncology
. 2016 Feb 3;2(3):154–163. doi: 10.1200/JGO.2015.001974

Nursing’s Potential to Address the Growing Cancer Burden in Low- and Middle-Income Countries

Julia M Challinor 1, Annette L Galassi 1,, Majeda A Al-Ruzzieh 1, Jean Bosco Bigirimana 1, Lori Buswell 1, Winnie KW So 1, Allison Burg Steinberg 1, Makeda Williams 1
PMCID: PMC5495453  PMID: 28717695

INTRODUCTION

Cancer has become a major noncommunicable disease (NCD) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) where an inadequately prepared and insufficient nursing workforce exists. Successful cancer care requires a team approach, and knowledgeable oncology nurses play a crucial role in a functioning team. The goals of reducing cancer incidence, improving survival, and providing better palliative care cannot be met without the efforts of these nurses. Oncology nurses who work in the community and at the bedside can deliver needed patient, family, and community education; implement early detection programs; administer treatments; identify complications; provide palliative care; and lead and collaborate on clinical research. Well-prepared oncology nurses have demonstrated a wide-ranging impact across the spectrum of cancer care in high-income countries (HICs). To benefit from this expertise, LMICs need workforce capacity–building efforts to educate nurses in cancer care initiatives, expand the scope of nursing practice, and increase task sharing as demonstrated in HIV/AIDS care in LMICs1; these efforts require time, money, and political commitment.

Despite efforts by western partners that work in LMIC oncology settings to include nursing training and an expansion of practice in their programs, results are limited and rarely, if ever, evaluated to determine efficacy.2,3 Therefore, all stakeholders involved in cancer control, treatment, education, and research (ie, ministries of health and education, nongovernmental organizations, funders, cancer advocates) must include a scale-up of oncology nursing in LMIC national and regional cancer control planning.

LMIC NURSES AND THE CANCER CONTINUUM

This article builds on these efforts and focuses on the critical role that nurses with appropriate education can play in providing care to patients with cancer across the cancer continuum to help to improve cancer control in LMICs and create an additional point of access to cancer care, particularly in settings where specialized care is rare and existing resources are strained. By highlighting the ways nurses can contribute to the improvement of oncology care in LMICs, this report addresses the issues that face the workforce and includes recommendations to illustrate how health and educational systems can be used to strengthen the expertise and expand the role of oncology nurses in LMICs. Nursing education, the nursing practice environment, and opportunities for role expansion and research have not kept pace with the growing need.4 The intention of this article is to serve as a call to action to focus attention and resources on the need for education and training of oncology nurses in LMICs.

NURSING’S POTENTIAL CONTRIBUTIONS TO CANCER CARE: WHAT CAN BE DONE IN LMICS

In all aspects of the fight against cancer, nurses participate dynamically as part of an interdisciplinary team. A well-prepared oncology nursing workforce includes generalist nurses who are prepared at the basic level and provide health promotion, risk assessment, and care for people who receive cancer treatment in their general practice; specialized nurses whose primary focus is the delivery of cancer care and who care mostly for people with or at risk for cancer; and advanced practice oncology nurses who provide cancer care at the master’s degree level of education or higher.5 Oncology nurses with master’s and doctoral education contribute through advanced practice, education, and scientist roles.

Adequately educated nurses can play many vital roles across the cancer control continuum; however, not all countries use nurses to their fullest capacity. As part of their Global Action Plan for NCDs, the WHO recommended that nations “[optimize] the scope of nurses’ and allied health professionals’ practice to contribute to the prevention and control of non-communicable disease, including addressing barriers to that contribution,”6p42 and many opportunities exist to maximize the impact of oncology-trained nurses in addressing the cancer burden.

Nurses’ intimate knowledge of patient populations make them an obvious partner among oncology specialists to address the increasing public health burden of this group of diseases. Nurses trained as specialists in oncology could address public health cancer risks, such as smoking and obesity, as well as cancer-causing environmental and occupational hazards in their local areas. Oncology nurse researchers in LMICs could collaborate with epidemiologists, medical anthropologists, environmental health scientists, public health professionals, and health economists to gather the much-needed data to measure the efficacy of cancer prevention activities, cancer incidence and prevalence, and outcomes of people treated for cancer. This section outlines what has been done in oncology from prevention through end-of-life care and survivorship by nurses who work in countries of various resource levels and what can be done in LMICs specifically to improve cancer-related outcomes around the globe.

Cancer Education

In LMICs, a patient’s first encounter with the health system often is with a community health worker (CHW) at the dispensary (community) level; however, CHW and nurses’ knowledge of cancer and cancer risk factors, signs, and symptoms in many LMICs is low.7-10 Oncology nurses placed throughout the country could dramatically increase the number of cases diagnosed in early stages. In addition, oncology nurses can educate CHWs about cancer to raise awareness and appropriately refer a patient for further evaluation.7,11 Further, nurses can increase adherence to screening guidelines because they are viewed as trusted members of their society.6 Thus, nurses can act more efficiently as patient navigators through the continuum of care to link the patient to local health systems and decrease delay in care.12,13

Prevention: The Unique Role of Nurses

One-third or more cancer diagnoses can be avoided by reducing risk factors, such as tobacco use, poor diet, low levels of physical activity, alcohol consumption, workplace and environmental carcinogens, and exposure to radiation; immunizing against hepatitis B and C viruses and the human papillomavirus (HPV); and preventing infection with Helicobacter pylori and schistosomiasis.14 Nurses are uniquely positioned to successfully implement preventive interventions at both the individual and the community level given their accessibility to and active role in the community. Disease prevention and health promotion have long been a part of nursing’s scope of practice. Nurses are trained to identify risk factors, and they have the communication and teaching skills to work with individuals, families, and communities to change behaviors to reduce risk factors.15-17

A Cochrane review of 16 studies about tobacco cessation conducted in various HICs showed evidence that the likelihood of reaching the positive outcome of quitting smoking is increased when nursing-specific interventions are used.18 Emerging research has demonstrated that nurses are instrumental in providing effective smoking cessation intervention in LMICs as well.19 In vaccination programs, nurses also have been instrumental in educating the public about the importance of vaccinations and in implementing these programs in LMICs for viruses such as HPV, the cause of cervical cancer, and hepatitis B virus, which is associated with an increased incidence of liver cancer. A school-based, opt-out HPV vaccination program in Rwanda has used nurses to reduce the two-decade delay in vaccine introduction between HICs and LMICs to 5 years.20

Screening and Early Detection: Opportunities for Expanded Care

To improve outcomes, prevention must be coupled with screening and early detection measures. Early detection decreases the overall costs of cancer treatment.9,21 With additional training, nurses can perform the broad range of interventions that contribute to screening,17,22 early detection, and even treatment of precancerous lesions.6 With nurses performing these activities, the few available physicians and oncologists can focus on tasks that require their specialized skills.23,24

Various programs have demonstrated that nurses play a vital role in screening. Studies in HICs have shown that nurses can perform flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy with ratings in patient satisfaction, safety, and effectiveness similar to those for procedures done by general surgeons and GI fellows.25-28 These findings suggest that appropriately trained oncology nurses in LMICs could assume this level of care as part of the task shifting that has already been demonstrated to be successful (eg, for colposcopy). However, challenges related to scope of practice for oncology nurses in LMICs remain.

Research findings in the Philippines, Indonesia, and Malaysia have demonstrated that clinical breast examinations done by nurses are a sustainable form of early detection and primary screening.29-31 In promoting general breast health awareness, nurses are a well-suited professional group to destigmatize disease within their respective communities.11 Nurses in LMICs knowledgeable about breast health and with skills in clinical breast examination can contribute to reaching the goal of downstaging the presentation of breast cancer in these countries.32

The Cervical Cancer Prevention Program in Zambia demonstrates the value nurses provide in cervical cancer control through the Screen and Treat program.33 Similar programs have been successfully implemented in other LMICs, including India.34

Treatment: Roles in Surgery, Chemotherapy, and Radiotherapy

Nurses around the globe play a vital and central role in the delivery of all cancer treatment modalities, particularly surgical, radiation, and medical oncology.35 For patients undergoing surgical intervention, nurses teach patients what to expect before, during, and after procedures. The nurse assesses the patient during the postoperative period by monitoring wound healing, preventing infection, managing pain, and facilitating return to activities of daily living. Surgical interventions such as mastectomy, orchiectomy, or colectomy may require nurses to assist patients to adapt to altered physical or emotional functioning. Surgical nurses in LMICs participate in multidisciplinary training to improve surgical outcomes in people with cancer.36 Despite this evidence, nursing management and care of patients undergoing surgical intervention remain suboptimal in many countries due to lack of adequate resources and targeted nursing education. For example, in Paraguay, postoperative pediatric neurosurgical management does not prevent the high infection rate that leads to early mortality for children with brain tumors.37 Well-educated pediatric oncology nurses could support efforts to improve neurosurgical interventions in LMICs.

Although radiation therapy is an important component of cancer control,38 of the 139 LMICs (as categorized by the World Bank), almost one-half (55) have no radiation facilities, and only four have adequate equipment.39 Nurses who work in radiation oncology units clinically assess and educate patients about radiotherapy by addressing patient fears and providing information about potential adverse effects. Nurses need to be knowledgeable about the specific radiation field so that they can educate patients to identify adverse effects early and so that steps can be taken to avoid complications, avoid treatment delays, or conclude radiation treatment prematurely, as has been demonstrated in Indonesia.40

Nurses who work in medical oncology practices in LMICs often administer and prepare chemotherapy41,42 and generally without personal protective equipment or a biologic safety cabinet.43,44 They need to be meticulous in this practice, particularly in math calculations to reconstitute chemotherapy agents, calculate body surface area, and assure appropriate dosing that is consistent with treatment protocols. Many nurses in LMICs, however, are not formally trained in chemotherapy administration and would like further education on the subject.45

Because of the lack of education, protective equipment, and trained pharmacists in many locations around the globe, chemotherapy preparation and administration poses a significant risk to nurses. Training for the safe handling of hazardous drugs is essential to protect both the nurses and their patients and families.46 Personal protective equipment, which includes chemotested gloves, disposable gowns, masks with eye shields or goggles, and a biosafety cabinet, must be available and used properly to protect nurses within their practice setting.43,47,48

Chemotherapy preparation ideally is the scope of the pharmacist and should be conducted in appropriate pharmacy facilities, even in LMICs.38 In fact, the inclusion of an oncology-trained pharmacist is a cost-effective way for an LMIC setting to improve chemotherapy preparation and handling; nurse and patient safety; and inventory control, patient and family education, hazardous drug waste management, and pharmaceutical cost savings.42 Nonetheless, the reality in many LMICs is that a shortage of either educated pharmacists or safety equipment exists and that nurses ultimately are responsible for both preparing and administering chemotherapy and therefore need to be properly educated about safety measures. Other professionals, such as engineers, are needed to develop low-cost, effective chemotherapy preparation facilities and equipment.

Treatment: Provision of Supportive Care in All Modalities

Patients who undergo cancer treatment benefit from supportive care, or the prevention and management of adverse effects.49-51 Oncology nurses are skilled at conducting a comprehensive assessment of the health and supportive care needs of patients with cancer. In addition, oncology nurses can educate and provide psychosocial and spiritual support by sharing and applying their knowledge of cancer and treatment modalities and adverse effects.5,52

Cancer and treatment-related symptoms are major stressors in patients with cancer. In LMICs, symptom burden that patients with cancer experience may be even worse than the experience of patients in HICs because supportive care, including symptom management, often is a low priority in LMICs, and essential medicines (eg, to control pain) may be unavailable.53,54 However, lack of information and education about cancer treatment and the management of its adverse effects are major barriers to effective cancer treatment in LMICs because supportive care often is inadequately addressed.32,55,56

Various studies have reported that patients who do not receive adequate symptom management can experience an increase in psychological distress, treatment delays or noncompliance, a prolonged hospital stay, and negative effects on quality of life.52,57-59 By educating patients so that they have a better understanding about their treatment, adherence to treatment could be enhanced and, in turn, could result in better treatment outcomes.60-62

Studies in HICs have reported positive effects of nursing interventions on the management of symptoms57,63,64 to minimize the consequence of cancer treatment57,65,66 and promote quality of life67-69 among patients. Oncology nurses are the closest to the patient and, therefore, have the unique opportunity and privilege to advocate for and support the patient and his or her family. They also play a significant role in assuring that the highest quality of care is delivered to achieve the best possible outcome.70,71

An Opportunity to Improve Outcomes Through Research and Evidence-Based Practice

Nurses have a unique perspective on health care systems that can contribute effectively to research and evidence-based interventions that inform service delivery, education and training, and policy recommendations. Nursing research has had a significant impact on health promotion and disease prevention in LMICs for health issues such as HIV/AIDS,72-74 maternal and child health,75,76 and mental health77 and can have a similar impact on oncology care. Nursing research and multidisciplinary research led by a team of nurses, physicians, statisticians, and others could assist in developing strategies for resource-appropriate best practices. In addition, nurses could make pivotal contributions to translational research for the development of evidence-based practice.

The WHO Global Forum for Government Nursing and Midwifery Officers (the Global Forum) calls for nursing and midwifery research on efficacy and cost-effectiveness of interventions, translational research, and collaborative partnerships for funding research and innovative projects.19 To enhance nurse and midwife capacity to address NCDs such as cancer, the Global Forum suggests research focused on expanding settings for implementing interventions, integrating risk assessment with clinical practice, surveying the prevalence of risky health behaviors, and training to enhance knowledge and skills on cancer and its risk factors.19 The advancement of nursing research in LMICs not only will enhance the cadre of cancer researchers78 but also will improve service delivery, training, policy, and health outcomes.79,80

As a result of challenges that stem from the hierarchy of power; lack of resources, mentors, and subject matter experts; limited oncology education and training opportunities; and lack of funding, nurses in LMICs interested in research usually have fewer opportunities compared with colleagues in HICs.81 They must also confront the perception that nurses are not fit to be researchers and the lack of integration of research with service delivery, treatment, and care. Capacity building for nurse-led research in LMICs is critical in elevating nurses as research scholars,82 translating nursing research into evidence-based practice, and recognizing nurses as potential policymakers,83 which thus improves health outcomes.

Palliative Care and Hospice: Managing Symptoms From Diagnosis Through End of Life

Palliative care supports patients with cancer and their families throughout the trajectory of illness. It might become even more significant in countries where late-stage diagnosis, for example,84 and low resource levels for treatment are most prevalent.

As with care during treatment, nurses assess, identify, and manage not only pain but also the physical, psychosocial, spiritual, and cultural needs of patients and their families at the end of life.85 Nurses trained in pain management; palliative care; and management of grief, death, and dying can positively affect the end-of-life experience, help patients to achieve a peaceful death, and help their families to cope with loss and grief.86-88 These skills are especially important for nurses in LMICs where the majority of patients present with advanced disease and where effective treatments to cure or even control the disease are limited.44,89

It is estimated that of the 20 million people needing palliative care at the end of life, around 80% live in LMICs.90 In most LMICs, however, palliative care is not considered an essential part of cancer care,91 and the majority of these countries do not meet basic international guidelines for the delivery of palliative care.90,92 Barriers to effective palliative care in LMICs include the limited availability of opioids and other medications to manage symptoms, inadequate knowledge, and a lack of country-level palliative care policies or integrated services.89,93,94 The WHO estimates that 5.5 million patients with cancer die in pain annually because they do not have access to opioid medications.95 Reasons include legal and regulatory restrictions on the use of opioids due to concerns about diversion, addiction, and misuse and cultural perceptions about pain and its treatment.96

Efforts are under way to improve nurses’ ability to provide adequate end-of-life care, such as the End-of-Life Nursing Education Consortium curriculum, which has been adapted to serve the needs of an international nursing audience. This curriculum has been used to train nurses from LMICs, including Eastern Europe, Central Asia, and Africa.97 The Institute of Hospice and Palliative Care in Uganda also leads regional efforts to train nurses.98

Nurses can act as advocates for improved end-of-life care in their country. They can work with government officials and nongovernmental organizations to develop policies that improve the availability of opioids. When nurses lead and participate in the development of hospice and palliative care services, access is expanded.96,99 Because nurses often are the health care provider with the closest connection with the community, they can help to overcome cultural barriers against the use of opioid medications by educating patients, families, and their colleagues.100

Survivorship

The term cancer survivor, as used in this section, is defined as individuals who have completed primary cancer treatment.101 The incidence of cancer has been increasing steadily in the past decade as has the number of cancer survivors. In 2012, 14.1 million people were given a diagnosis of cancer, and globally, 32.6 million people have lived within 5 years of diagnosis102,102a; however, the prolonging of the lifespan of survivors does not necessarily mean that their well-being is improved. Cancer survivors continue to experience late effects of treatment and psychosocial complications after treatment.103,104 Cancer survivors have been reported to experience a poorer quality of life than the general population.105,106 Prolonged experience of complications and a poorer quality of life may be detrimental to survivors’ health and, in turn, increase health care use and the burden on existing health care services.107,108 Although health care professionals in HICs have highlighted the use of cancer survivorship care plans,109 which aim to assist in providing a patient with a smooth transition from active treatment at a cancer center to post-treatment care in the community,110 this kind of supportive care service for cancer survivors in LMICs has not been addressed.

Various studies have reported positive outcomes of health care services for survivors that are led by nurses or include nurse involvement. Nurse-led efforts in psychosocial support and healthy lifestyle promotion have shown benefits for quality of life and behavioral outcomes for patients,111,112 and nurses have been involved in protocol design for post-treatment follow-up care.113 Although most of the studies were conducted in HICs, the findings provide strong evidence that nurses in LMICs who received oncology-specific education and training could make comparable contributions to supportive care services for cancer survivors.

Across the cancer continuum and around the world, nurses play an integral role throughout a patient’s cancer journey. Nurses must be educated and positioned to practice to their utmost potential to improve patient outcomes at all points of care and in all locations.114

In conclusion, the burden of cancer is increasing worldwide,115 and cancer is one of the NCDs prioritized by the agendas of the WHO, the United Nations, and other international organizations. Unfortunately, the health care professionals who provide care across the cancer continuum, from prevention and detection to treatment, end-of-life care, and survivorship, are seriously lacking in LMICs. Initiatives have addressed cancer in LMICs by using the limited health care staff available; however, the current mortality statistic for patients with cancer in these countries is 72% to 75%, which is devastating.116 When governments and donors commit to supporting sustainable development of the health care infrastructure, including the personnel and material resources required, this statistic can be changed, and nurses must be central to designing the solutions.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

Other members of the Key Stakeholder Group for Strengthening Oncology Nursing in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Stella Bialous and Greta Cummings, International Society of Nurses in Cancer Care, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Sara W. Day, St Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN; Kathy Houlahan, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA; Brenda Nevidjon, Oncology Nursing Society, Pittsburg, PA; Julie Schneider, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Marina Teahon, Union for International Cancer Control, Geneva, Switzerland; and Pamela (Akinyi) Were, EMBLEM Project, Kenya. We thank Matthew Pun (Duke University, Durham, NC), intern with the National Cancer Institute Center for Global Health, for assistance with the organization of this article.

Footnotes

Authors’ disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and contributions are found at the end of this article.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Manuscript writing: All authors

Final approval of manuscript: All authors

AUTHORS' DISCLOSURES OF POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Nursing’s Potential to Address the Growing Cancer Burden in Low- and Middle-Income Countries

The following represents disclosure information provided by authors of this manuscript. All relationships are considered compensated. Relationships are self-held unless noted. I = Immediate Family Member, Inst = My Institution. Relationships may not relate to the subject matter of this manuscript. For more information about ASCO's conflict of interest policy, please refer to www.asco.org/rwc or jco.ascopubs.org/site/ifc.

Julia M. Challinor

No relationship to disclose

Annette L. Galassi

No relationship to disclose

Majeda A. Al-Ruzzieh

No relationship to disclose

Jean Bosco Bigirimana

No relationship to disclose

Lori Buswell

No relationship to disclose

Winnie K.W. So

No relationship to disclose

Allison Burg Steinberg

No relationship to disclose

Makeda Williams

No relationship to disclose

REFERENCES

  • 1.Callaghan M, Ford N, Schneider H. A systematic review of task-shifting for HIV treatment and care in Africa. Hum Resour Health. 2010;8:8–16. doi: 10.1186/1478-4491-8-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Galassi A, Challinor J, Key Stakeholder Group on Oncology Nursing in Low- and Middle-Income Countries Strengthening the oncology nurse workforce in low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:887–888. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00144-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Day SW, Garcia J, Antillon F, et al. A sustainable model for pediatric oncology nursing education in low-income countries. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2012;58:163–166. doi: 10.1002/pbc.24007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.de Carvalho CRH, de Lima SBS, Barros S, et al. Formación de las enfermeras en atención oncológica: Ayudas para la gestión en un hospital universitario [in Portuguese] Evidentia. 2013;10:3. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Canadian Association of Nurses in Oncology . Practice Standards and Competencies for the Specialized Oncology Nurse. Vancouver, British Columbia: Canadian Association of Nurses in Oncology; 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.World Health Organization . Global action plan for prevention and control of noncommunicable diseases 2013-2020. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Mutebi M, Wasike R, Mushtaq A, et al. The effectiveness of an abbreviated training program for health workers in breast cancer awareness: Innovative strategies for resource constrained environments. Springerplus. 2013;2:528. doi: 10.1186/2193-1801-2-528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Akhigbe AO, Omuemu VO. Knowledge, attitudes and practice of breast cancer screening among female health workers in a Nigerian urban city. BMC Cancer. 2009;9:203. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-9-203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wadler BM, Judge CM, Prout M, et al. Improving breast cancer control via the use of community health workers in South Africa: A critical review. J Oncol. 2011;2011:1–8. doi: 10.1155/2011/150423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Andsoy II, Gul A. Breast, cervix and colorectal cancer knowledge among nurses in Turkey. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15:2267–2272. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.5.2267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Abuidris DO, Elsheikh A, Ali M, et al. Breast-cancer screening with trained volunteers in a rural area of Sudan: A pilot study. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14:363–370. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70583-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Henderson S, Kendall E. ‘Community navigators’: Making a difference by promoting health in culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) communities in Logan, Queensland. Aust J Prim Health. 2011;17:347–354. doi: 10.1071/PY11053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ngoc Nguyen TU, Tanjasiri SP, Kagawa-Singer M, et al. Community health navigators for breast- and cervical-cancer screening among Cambodian and Laotian women: Intervention strategies and relationship-building processes. Health Promot Pract. 2008;9:356–367. doi: 10.1177/1524839906290251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.World Health Organization Cancer. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs297/en/
  • 15.Ayres CG. Said another way. Nurses’ role in cancer control. Nurs Forum. 2009;44:64–67. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6198.2009.00128.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Rwamugira J, Maree JE. The findings of a nurse-lead intervention for detection and prevention of oral cancer. A pilot study. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2012;21:266–273. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2011.01310.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Twinn S. Developments in nursing practice in primary health care in Hong Kong: Opportunities and challenges. J Clin Nurs. 2001;10:345–351. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Rice VH, Hartmann-Boyce J, Stead LF. Nursing interventions for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;8:CD001188. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001188.pub4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.World Health Organization . Strengthening the Role of Nursing and Midwifery in Noncommunicable Diseases (NCDs) Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Binagwaho A, Wagner CM, Gatera M, et al. Achieving high coverage in Rwanda’s national human papillomavirus vaccination programme. Bull World Health Organ. 2012;90:623–628. doi: 10.2471/BLT.11.097253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.CanTreat International Scaling up cancer diagnosis and treatment in developing countries: What can we learn from the HIV/AIDS epidemic. Ann Oncol. 2010;21:680–682. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdq055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Lourenço TS, Mauad EC, Vieira RA. Barreiras no rastreamento do câncer de mama e o papel da enfermagem: Revisão integrativa [in Portuguese] Rev Bras Enferm. 2013;66:585–591. doi: 10.1590/s0034-71672013000400018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Joshi R, Alim M, Kengne AP, et al. Task shifting for non-communicable disease management in low and middle income countries–a systematic review. PLoS One. 2014;9:e103754. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Magrath I, Sutcliffe S. Building capacity for cancer treatment in low-income countries with particular reference to East Africa. Cancer Contr. 2014;2014:61–66. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Schoenfeld P, Lipscomb S, Crook J, et al. Accuracy of polyp detection by gastroenterologists and nurse endoscopists during flexible sigmoidoscopy: A randomized trial. Gastroenterology. 1999;117:312–318. doi: 10.1053/gast.1999.0029900312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Koornstra JJ, Corporaal S, Giezen-Beintema WM, et al. Colonoscopy training for nurse endoscopists: A feasibility study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69:688–695. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.09.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Verschuur EM, Kuipers EJ, Siersema PD. Nurses working in GI and endoscopic practice: A review. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;65:469–479. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2006.11.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hui AJ, Lau JY, Lam PP, et al. Comparison of colonoscopic performance between medical and nurse endoscopists: A non-inferiority randomised controlled study in Asia. Gut. 2015;64:1058–1062. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2013-306293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Pisani P, Parkin DM, Ngelangel C, et al. Outcome of screening by clinical examination of the breast in a trial in the Philippines. Int J Cancer. 2006;118:149–154. doi: 10.1002/ijc.21343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Devi BC, Tang TS, Corbex M. Reducing by half the percentage of late-stage presentation for breast and cervix cancer over 4 years: A pilot study of clinical downstaging in Sarawak, Malaysia. Ann Oncol. 2007;18:1172–1176. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdm105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kardinah D, Anderson BO, Duggan C, et al. Short report: Limited effectiveness of screening mammography in addition to clinical breast examination by trained nurse midwives in rural Jakarta, Indonesia. Int J Cancer. 2014;134:1250–1255. doi: 10.1002/ijc.28442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Anderson BO, Cazap E, El Saghir NS, et al. Optimisation of breast cancer management in low-resource and middle-resource countries: Executive summary of the Breast Health Global Initiative consensus, 2010. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12:387–398. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70031-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Mwanahamuntu MH, Sahasrabuddhe VV, Kapambwe S, et al. Advancing cervical cancer prevention initiatives in resource-constrained settings: Insights from the Cervical Cancer Prevention Program in Zambia. PLoS Med. 2011;8:e1001032. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Sankaranarayanan R, Esmy PO, Rajkumar R, et al. Effect of visual screening on cervical cancer incidence and mortality in Tamil Nadu, India: A cluster-randomised trial. Lancet. 2007;370:398–406. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61195-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Quinn A. Expanding the role of the oncology nurse. Biomed Imaging Interv J. 2008;4:e34. doi: 10.2349/biij.4.3.e34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Price R, Sergelen O, Unursaikhan C. Improving surgical care in Mongolia: A model for sustainable development. World J Surg. 2013;37:1492–1499. doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1763-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Baskin JL, Lezcano E, Kim BS, et al. Management of children with brain tumors in Paraguay. Neuro-oncol. 2013;15:235–241. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nos291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.El Saghir NS, Adebamowo CA, Anderson BO, et al. Breast cancer management in low resource countries (LRCs): Consensus statement from the Breast Health Global Initiative. Breast. 2011;20:S3–S11. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2011.02.006. (suppl 2) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Datta NR, Samiei M, Bodis S. Radiation therapy infrastructure and human resources in low- and middle-income countries: Present status and projections for 2020. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014;89:448–457. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Stoker SD, Wildeman MA, Fles R, et al. A prospective study: Current problems in radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. PLoS One. 2014;9:e85959. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Stefan DC. Childhood cancer in Africa: An overview of resources. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol, 2015;37:104–108. doi: 10.1097/MPH.0000000000000111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Wiernikowski JT, Barr RD. Essential medicines and pharmacy services. In: Stephan DC, Rodriguez-Galindo C, editors. Pediatric Hematology-Oncology in Countries With Limited Resources. New York, NY: Springer; 2014. pp. 129–137. doi 10.1007/978-1-4614-3891-5_10. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Palmer-Wickham S, Beattie K, Boudreau A, et al. Schering Plough Lecture 2009. The twinning experience: Meaning of an educational program for nurses in Kenya [in English and French] Can Oncol Nurs J. 2010;20:129–142. doi: 10.5737/1181912x2031129134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Kingham TP, Alatise OI, Vanderpuye V, et al. Treatment of cancer in sub-Saharan Africa. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14:e158–e167. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70472-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Challinor JM, Hollis R, Freidank C, et al. Educational needs and strategies of pediatric oncology nurses in low- and middle-income countries: An International Society of Pediatric Oncology-Pediatric Oncology in Developing Countries Nursing Working Group Initiative. Cancer Nurs. 2014;37:E36–E47. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.World Health Organization Report of the Fifth Global Forum for Government Chief Nurses and Midwives—Strengthening the Role of Nursing and Midwifery in Addressing Noncommunicable Diseases. Geneva, Switzerland, World Health Organization, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Day S, Hollis R, Challinor J, et al. SIOP PODC Nursing Working Group Baseline standards for paediatric oncology nursing care in low to middle income countries: Position statement of the SIOP PODC Nursing Working Group. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:681–682. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70213-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Neuss MN, Polovich M, McNiff K, et al. 2013 Updated American Society of Clinical Oncology/Oncology Nursing Society chemotherapy administration safety standards including standards for the safe administration and management of oral chemotherapy. J Oncol Pract. 2013;9:5s–13s. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2013.000874. (suppl 2) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.McCorkle R, Ercolano E, Lazenby M, et al. Self-management: Enabling and empowering patients living with cancer as a chronic illness. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61:50–62. doi: 10.3322/caac.20093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Hong J, Song Y, Liu J, et al. Perception and fulfillment of cancer patients’ nursing professional social support needs: From the health care personnel point of view. Support Care Cancer. 2014;22:1049–1058. doi: 10.1007/s00520-013-2062-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Selman L, Higginson IJ, Agupio G, et al. Meeting information needs of patients with incurable progressive disease and their families in South Africa and Uganda: Multicentre qualitative study. BMJ. 2009;338:b1326. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b1326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Aranda S, Yates P. A National Professional Development Framework for Cancer Nursing (ed 2) Canberra, Australia: The National Cancer Nursing Education Project (EdCaN), Cancer Australia; 2009. [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Cardoso F, Bese N, Distelhorst SR, et al. Supportive care during treatment for breast cancer: Resource allocations in low- and middle-income countries. A Breast Health Global Initiative 2013 consensus statement. Breast. 2013;22:593–605. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2013.07.050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Yao A, Coze C, Traoré F, et al. Prise en charge de la douleur de l’enfant atteint de cancer en Afrique : État des lieux au sein du Groupe Franco-Africain d’Oncologie Pédiatrique [in French] Arch Pediatr. 2013;20:257–264. doi: 10.1016/j.arcped.2012.12.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Holland J, Watson M, Dunn J. The IPOS new International Standard of Quality Cancer Care: Integrating the psychosocial domain into routine care. Psychooncology. 2011;20:677–680. doi: 10.1002/pon.1978. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.da Silva JT, Matheus MC, Fustinoni SM, et al. Prática profissional de enfermeiras que cuidam de pacientes com câncer em hospitais gerais [in Portuguese] Rev Bras Enferm. 2012;65:460–465. doi: 10.1590/s0034-71672012000300010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Borneman T, Koczywas M, Sun VC, et al. Reducing patient barriers to pain and fatigue management. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2010;39:486–501. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.08.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Laugsand EA, Jakobsen G, Kaasa S, et al. Inadequate symptom control in advanced cancer patients across Europe. Support Care Cancer. 2011;19:2005–2014. doi: 10.1007/s00520-010-1051-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Chan CW, Richardson A, Richardson J. Managing symptoms in patients with advanced lung cancer during radiotherapy: Results of a psychoeducational randomized controlled trial. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2011;41:347–357. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.04.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Halfdanarson TR, Jatoi A. Oral cancer chemotherapy: The critical interplay between patient education and patient safety. Curr Oncol Rep. 2010;12:247–252. doi: 10.1007/s11912-010-0103-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Shelton RC, Goldman RE, Emmons KM, et al. An investigation into the social context of low-income, urban black and Latina women: Implications for adherence to recommended health behaviors. Health Educ Behav. 2011;38:471–481. doi: 10.1177/1090198110382502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Secginli S, Nahcivan NO. The effectiveness of a nurse-delivered breast health promotion program on breast cancer screening behaviours in non-adherent Turkish women: A randomized controlled trial. Int J Nurs Stud. 2011;48:24–36. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.05.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.van der Meulen IC, May AM, Ros WJ, et al. One-year effect of a nurse-led psychosocial intervention on depressive symptoms in patients with head and neck cancer: A randomized controlled trial. Oncologist. 2013;18:336–344. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2012-0299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Hāo MX. Effect of a comprehensive nursing intervention on pain among cancer patients. Nursing Practice and Research. 2014;10:23–24. [in Chinese]. [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Jefford M, Lotfi-Jam K, Baravelli C, et al. Development and pilot testing of a nurse-led posttreatment support package for bowel cancer survivors. Cancer Nurs. 2011;34:E1–E10. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0b013e3181f22f02. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Gates P, Seymour JF, Krishnasamy M. Insights into the development of a nurse-led survivorship care intervention for long-term survivors of Hodgkin lymphoma. Aust J Cancer Nurs. 2012;13:4–10. [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Haase JE, Braden CJ. Conceptualization and measurement of quality of life and related concepts: Progress to date and guidelines for clarity. In: King C, Hinds PS, editors. Quality of Life From Nursing and Patient Perspectives. Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning; 2012. pp. 59–82. [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Bakitas M, Lyons KD, Hegel MT, et al. Effects of a palliative care intervention on clinical outcomes in patients with advanced cancer: The Project ENABLE II randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2009;302:741–749. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Lo SF, Hayter M, Hu WY, et al. Symptom burden and quality of life in patients with malignant fungating wounds. J Adv Nurs. 2012;68:1312–1321. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05839.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Lamb BW, Brown KF, Nagpal K, et al. Quality of care management decisions by multidisciplinary cancer teams: A systematic review. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:2116–2125. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-1675-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Saini KS, Taylor C, Ramirez AJ, et al. Role of the multidisciplinary team in breast cancer management: Results from a large international survey involving 39 countries. Ann Oncol. 2012;23:853–859. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdr352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Curran K, Baeten JM, Coates TJ, et al. HIV-1 prevention for HIV-1 serodiscordant couples. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2012;9:160–170. doi: 10.1007/s11904-012-0114-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Heffron R, Ngure K, Mugo N, et al. Willingness of Kenyan HIV-1 serodiscordant couples to use antiretroviral-based HIV-1 prevention strategies. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2012;61:116–119. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e31825da73f. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Lee SJ, Li L, Jiraphongsa C, et al. Caregiver burden of family members of persons living with HIV in Thailand. Int J Nurs Pract. 2010;16:57–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-172X.2009.01812.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Edmonds JK, Paul M, Sibley L. Determinants of place of birth decisions in uncomplicated childbirth in Bangladesh: An empirical study. Midwifery. 2012;28:554–560. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2011.12.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Foster J, Burgos R, Tejada C, et al. A community-based participatory research approach to explore community perceptions of the quality of maternal-newborn health services in the Dominican Republic. Midwifery. 2010;26:504–511. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2010.06.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Lin D, Li X, Wang B, et al. Discrimination, perceived social inequity, and mental health among rural-to-urban migrants in China. Community Ment Health J. 2011;47:171–180. doi: 10.1007/s10597-009-9278-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Price AJ, Ndom P, Atenguena E, et al. Cancer care challenges in developing countries. Cancer. 2012;118:3627–3635. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.de Raaf PJ, de Klerk C, Timman R, et al. Systematic monitoring and treatment of physical symptoms to alleviate fatigue in patients with advanced cancer: A randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:716–723. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.44.4216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Ruccione K, Kramer RF, Moore IK, et al. Informed consent for treatment of childhood cancer: Factors affecting parents’ decision making. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. 1991;8:112–121. doi: 10.1177/104345429100800304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Edwards N, Webber J, Mill J, et al. Building capacity for nurse-led research. Int Nurs Rev. 2009;56:88–94. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-7657.2008.00683.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Sullivan R, Badwe RA, Rath GK, et al. Cancer research in India: National priorities, global results. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:e213–e222. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70109-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Shariff N. Factors that act as facilitators and barriers to nurse leaders’ participation in health policy development. BMC Nurs. 2014;13:20. doi: 10.1186/1472-6955-13-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Toure M, Nguessan E, Bambara AT, et al. Facteurs liés au diagnostic tardif des cancers du sein en Afrique-sub-saharienne: Cas de la Côte d’Ivoire [in French] Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2013;41:696–700. doi: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2013.08.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Leboeuf I, Lachapelle D, Dubois S, et al. La contribution de l’infirmière pivot dans l’expérience de l’annonce d’un diagnostic de cancer chez la personne atteinte et les proches [in French] Can Oncol Nurs J. 2014;24:184–188. doi: 10.5737/1181912x243189193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.International Council of Nurses . Nurses’ Role in Providing Care to Dying Patients and Their Families. Geneva, Switzerland: International Council of Nurses; 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Pedreros Mosquera MA. Dilemas bioéticos de enfermería en la atención de personas con enfermedad oncológica en fase terminal [specialization thesis]. Biblioteca Alfonso Borrero Cabal S.J. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Wang SC. Cancer nurses’ intervention for family members of patient with terminal stage of cancer [in Chinese] Hainan Med J. 2012;23:155–156. [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Cleary J, Ddungu H, Distelhorst SR, et al. Supportive and palliative care for metastatic breast cancer: Resource allocations in low- and middle-income countries. A Breast Health Global Initiative 2013 consensus statement. Breast. 2013;22:616–627. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2013.07.052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.World Health Organization Strengthening of palliative care as a component of integrated treatment throughout the life course, 2013. doi: 10.3109/15360288.2014.911801. http://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/EB134/B134_28-en.pdf. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 91.Silbermann M, Al-Zadjali M. Nurses paving the way to improving palliative care services in the Middle East. J Palliative Care Med. 2013;3:e125. [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Lynch T, Connor S, Clark D. Mapping levels of palliative care development: A global update. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2013;45:1094–1106. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2012.05.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Paice JA, Ferrell BR, Coyle N, et al. Global efforts to improve palliative care: The International End‐of‐Life Nursing Education Consortium Training Programme. J Adv Nurs. 2008;61:173–180. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04475.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Worldwide Palliative Care Alliance . World Health Organization: Global Atlas of Palliative Care at the End of Life. London, UK: Worldwide Palliative Care Alliance; 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 95.World Health Organization . Ensuring Balance in National Policies on Controlled Substances: Guidance for Availability and Accessibility of Controlled Medicines. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Lamas D, Rosenbaum L. Painful inequities–palliative care in developing countries. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:199–201. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1113622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Malloy P, Paice J, Coyle N, et al. Promoting palliative care worldwide through international nursing education. J Transcult Nurs. 2014;25:410–417. doi: 10.1177/1043659614523993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Hospice Africa Uganda Some facts about hospice Africa Uganda complex. http://www.hospiceafrica.or.ug/index.php/publications/fact-sheets/send/5-fact-sheets/81-hau-fact-sheet-april-2014.
  • 99.Malloy P, Paice JA, Ferrell BR, et al. Advancing palliative care in Kenya. Cancer Nurs. 2011;34:E10–E13. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0b013e3181ea73dd. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Pirnazarova G, Paice JA, Schlickau J, et al. Palliative care in Kyrgyzstan: Special challenges and a new role for nursing. J Hosp Palliat Nurs. 2013;15:E1–E5. [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Feuerstein M. Defining cancer survivorship. J Cancer Surviv. 2007;1:5–7. doi: 10.1007/s11764-006-0002-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Ervik M, et al. GLOBOCAN 2012 v1.0: Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide—IARC CancerBase No. 11. http://globocan.iarc.fr.
  • 102a.Bray F, Ren JS, Masuyer E, et al. Estimates of global cancer prevalence for 27 sites in the adult population in 2008. Int J Cancer. 2013;132:1133–1145. doi: 10.1002/ijc.27711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Siegel R, DeSantis C, Virgo K, et al. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012;62:220–241. doi: 10.3322/caac.21149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Paskett ED, Dean JA, Oliveri JM, et al. Cancer-related lymphedema risk factors, diagnosis, treatment, and impact: A review. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:3726–3733. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.41.8574. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Oeffinger KC, Nathan PC, Kremer LC. Challenges after curative treatment for childhood cancer and long-term follow up of survivors. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2010;24:129–149. doi: 10.1016/j.hoc.2009.11.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Lee ES, Lee MK, Kim SH, et al. Health-related quality of life in survivors with breast cancer 1 year after diagnosis compared with the general population: A prospective cohort study. Ann Surg. 2011;253:101–108. doi: 10.1097/sla.0b013e3181f662ce. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Peuckmann V, Ekholm O, Sjøgren P, et al. Health care utilisation and characteristics of long-term breast cancer survivors: Nationwide survey in Denmark. Eur J Cancer. 2009;45:625–633. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.09.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Yabroff KR, Lund J, Kepka D, et al. Economic burden of cancer in the United States: Estimates, projections, and future research. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011;20:2006–2014. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Institute of Medicine Fact Sheet: Cancer Survivorship Care Planning. Washington, DC, National Academy of Sciences, 2015.
  • 110.Hill-Kayser CE, Vachani CC, Hampshire MK, et al. Impact of Internet-based cancer survivorship care plans on health care and lifestyle behaviors. Cancer. 2013;119:3854–3860. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Park JH, Bae SH, Jung YS, et al. Quality of life and symptom experience in breast cancer survivors after participating in a psychoeducational support program: A pilot study. Cancer Nurs. 2012;35:E34–E41. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0b013e318218266a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Kim SH, Shin MS, Lee HS, et al. Randomized pilot test of a simultaneous stage-matched exercise and diet intervention for breast cancer survivors. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2011;38:E97–E106. doi: 10.1188/11.ONF.E97-E106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Howell D, Hack TF, Oliver TK, et al. Models of care for post-treatment follow-up of adult cancer survivors: A systematic review and quality appraisal of the evidence. J Cancer Surviv. 2012;6:359–371. doi: 10.1007/s11764-012-0232-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Surbone A, Baider L, Weitzman TS, et al. MASCC Psychosocial Study Group Psychosocial care for patients and their families is integral to supportive care in cancer: MASCC position statement. Support Care Cancer. 2010;18:255–263. doi: 10.1007/s00520-009-0693-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Fitzmaurice C, Dicker D, Pain A, et al. Global Burden of Disease Cancer Collaboration The global burden of cancer 2013. JAMA Oncol. 2015;1:505–527. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.0735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Farmer P, Frenk J, Knaul FM, et al. Expansion of cancer care and control in countries of low and middle income: A call to action. Lancet. 2010;376:1186–1193. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61152-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Global Oncology are provided here courtesy of American Society of Clinical Oncology

RESOURCES