Skip to main content
Journal of Community Genetics logoLink to Journal of Community Genetics
. 2017 May 16;8(3):239–241. doi: 10.1007/s12687-017-0305-9

Education for fathers about newborn screening and leftover dried blood spots

Erin Rothwell 1,, Bob Wong 1, Erin Johnson 1, Jeffrey R Botkin 1
PMCID: PMC5496843  PMID: 28510049

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to assess the impact of an educational intervention on paternal knowledge, attitudes, and support about newborn screening (NBS) and dried blood spots (DBS). Participants (n = 147) were randomized into one of two groups. The results from this study indicated that video education tools about NBS and DBS is associated with significantly increased knowledge, support, and satisfaction for both NBS and research use of DBS and an opt-out consent approach for DBS among fathers.

Introduction

While newborn screening is mandatory in most states, the retention and use of residual dried blood spots (DBS) is not. Residual DBS are a unique opportunity for public health research because it incorporates biospecimens from almost all children born in the USA. Allowing a child’s residual DBS to be stored and used for research purposes ideally should reflect a joint decision by the parents. Although only one parental signature is legally required for permission to store and use the residual newborn screening samples, it is appropriate and desirable for parents to communicate with one another about this decision. As such, how fathers are integrated into the education and consent process is important not only for health departments but for this research resource.

We conducted a randomized control trial (RCT) to assess the impact of new prenatal education approach among pregnant women about newborn screening and the storage and use of leftover newborn screening blood samples (Botkin et al. 2016). The study results found that education during pregnancy was associated with significantly higher scores on knowledge about NBS and residual DBS use and willingness and support for research with residual DBS. This RCT only surveyed fathers for the same outcomes under the assumption that education for mothers on the topic may lead to changes in knowledge or attitudes in their partners. Our survey results for fathers found little to no difference between the control and intervention groups, indicating that an intervention targeted to the mother does not directly translate into improved knowledge for the father (Botkin et al. 2016). Therefore, the purpose of this study aimed to investigate if an educational video intervention specifically targeting fathers about newborn screening and the storage and use of newborn screening samples would result in increased knowledge, increased support, and a change in attitudes toward newborn screening and DBS retention and research use compared to written information typically provided in brochures.

Methods

Institutional review board approval was obtained prior to any research activity. During August 2016, 147 participants were recruited through Knowledge Networks (KN), a company that conducts Internet-based surveys using a large, pre-established panel with a nationally representative probability sample (Couper 2000). Simple randomization was used, resulting in 58 in the intervention group and 89 in the control group (see Table 1 for demographics of this sample and the original RCT).

Table 1.

Demographics

Demographics table
Fathers NBS prenatal RCT
n = 147 n = 664
Characteristic Avg. or n SD or % Avg. or n SD or %
Age at enrollment (years) 37.78 7.17 31.05 5.60
Hispanic
 Yes 12 8.2% 184 27.9%
 No 135 91.8% 475 72.1%
Race
 Black or African American 6 4.1% 112 17.0%
 White 120 81.6% 321 48.6%
 Multi-racial 1 0.7% 39 5.9%
 Other 20 13.6% 157 23.6%
 Unknown or not reported 0 0.0% 35 5.3%
Education
 Less than high school 1 0.68% 47 7.1%
 High school 14 9.52% 107 16.1%
 Some college 32 21.77% 190 28.6%
 Bachelor’s degree or higher 100 68.03% 319 48.0%
 Unknown or not reported 0 0.0% 1 1.5%
Income
 Under $24,999 16 10.9% 109 16.4%
 $25,000–$50,000 24 16.3% 113 17.0%
 $50,001–$100,000 62 42.2% 146 22.0%
 $100,001–$150,000 26 17.7% 76 11.4%
 Over $150,000 19 12.9% 74 11.1%
 Not sure/do not know 0 0.0% 103 15.5%
 Decline to answer 0 0.0% 43 6.5%

The intervention group watched two brief educational videos developed by the Genetic Science Learning Center (GSLC) at the University of Utah. A 6-min video conveyed information about NBS, based on the work of Davis et al. (Davis et al. 2006). A separate 7-min video, developed based on our prior research, conveyed basic information about residual DBS and their potential uses in biomedical research (Botkin et al. 2014). The control group was provided brief written information about NBS, similar to what would be provided in the brochure at the hospital. Immediately after watching the videos or reading the educational material, all participants completed the follow-up measures.

Measures

Two knowledge measures and questions about attitudes and satisfaction were used from the original RCT (see Botkin et al. 2016). The knowledge scale consisted of 15 items assessing comprehension about newborn screening (alpha = .78) and 20 items measuring comprehension about the storage and research uses of leftover bloodspots (alpha = .95). Additional survey items from the original RCT were also used to assess support for research with DBS and satisfaction with the process.

Analysis

All analyses were conducted utilizing SPSS Version 22. Univariate analysis of variance with Tukey post-hoc adjustment was conducted to test the relationship of group assignment (control, and video groups) on knowledge outcome scores. Pearson Chi-square or Fisher’s exact testing (if cell count minimums were violated) were used to test group assignment with categorical outcome variables (i.e., opting out of NBS, attitude, and opinion questions).

Results

The total correct responses on our knowledge instrument regarding NBS increased from 50.6% in the control group to 74.7% in the video intervention group (p < 0.001) and for knowledge instrument regarding DBS the total correct responses increased from 23.2% in the control group to 75.4% for the video intervention group (p < 0.001). Also, support for research with DBS on diseases that affect women and children was significantly higher for the video intervention group (p = 0.042) and for quality improvement for newborn screening (p < 0.001). Satisfaction with information provided was also significantly higher for the video intervention group (p > 0.001). Finally, participants were asked if they prefer an opt-in or an opt-out consent approach. There was over representation of answering “Use the leftover blood spots only if parents sign a form saying it is OK” in the control group (68.5%) compared to the intervention group (50.0%), and over representation of answering “Use the leftover blood spots unless the parents contact the health department to remove their child’s bloodspot” in the video group (48.3%) compared to control group (31.5%) (p = 0.047).

Discussion

The results from this study as well as our previous RCT among pregnant women (Botkin et al. 2016), indicated that video education tools about NBS and DBS delivered at the same time is associated with increased knowledge, support, and satisfaction for both NBS and research use of DBS compared to brochure-based information approaches. When the fathers were surveyed in the original RCT (Botkin et al. 2016), there was little to no difference between the control group and the video intervention group on measures of knowledge, satisfaction, and attitudes toward NBS and DBS. As such, interventions that are related to children may want to target fathers as well as mothers, together or separately, and not to assume education of one parent translates to the other parent.

Finally, as noted in other research and this study, when educated about both NBS and DBS, there was significantly more support for an opt-out approach to the consent for the storage and use of DBS and can increase trust (Rothwell et al. 2016).

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH), grant HD062762

Compliance with ethical standards

Funding

This study was funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH), grant HD062762.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Botkin, J. R., Rothwell, E., Anderson, R. A., Goldenberg, A., Kuppermann, M., Dolan, S. M., … Stark, L. (2014) What parents should know about the storage and use of residual newborn bloodspots. Am J Med Gene 164A (11): 2739–2744 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  2. Botkin, J. R., Rothwell, E., Anderson, R. A., Rose, N., Dolan, S. M., Kuppermann, M., … Wong, B. (2016) Prenatal education of parents about newborn screening and residual dried bloodspots. JAMA Pediatr 170(6): 543–549 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  3. Couper M. Web surveys: a review of issues and approaches. Public Opinion Quarterly. 2000;64(4):464–494. doi: 10.1086/318641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Davis, T. C., Humiston, S. G., Arnold, C. L., Bocchini, J., Bass, P. F., Kennen, E. M., … Lloyd-Puryear, M. (2006) Recommendations for effective newborn screening communication: Results of focus groups with parents, providers, and experts. Pediatrics 117: 326–340. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-2633M [DOI] [PubMed]
  5. Rothwell E, Wong B, Anderson RA, Botkin JR. The influence of education on public trust and consent preferences with residual newborn screening dried blood spots. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics. 2016;11:231–236. doi: 10.1177/1556264616656976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Community Genetics are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES