Skip to main content
. 2017 May 3;206(2):811–828. doi: 10.1534/genetics.116.197590

Table 2. ERV14 complementation and copy number.

Genotype Unstable Chr. (×10−5) Allelic rec. (×10−5) Chr. loss (×10−4)
Median (Q1, Q3) Fold stabil. Median (Q1, Q3) Fold stabil. Median (Q1, Q3) Fold stabil.
rad9 57 (40, 71) 1 6.0 (2.8, 8.2) 1 22 (16, 39) 1
rad9erv14 ERV14x2 40 (36, 44) 1.4* 4.0 (3.2, 12) 1.5 15 (12, 22) 1.5
rad9ERV14x2a 51 (43, 54) 1.1 7.2 (6.4, 8.6) 0.83 21 (19, 24) 1.0

Complementation section: instability frequencies and genome fold stabilization of ERV14 complementation of rad9Δ erv14 normalized to rad9Δ erv14; ERV14 copy number section: instability frequencies and genome fold stabilization of rad9Δ with extra copies of ERV14, normalized to rad9Δ. Cells with a light gray background indicate genome fold stabilization increase; cells with a white background indicate decreased fold stabilization (<1.0 = increased instability) or no change in stabilization (=1.0). Statistically significant appears in boldface type. Kruskal–Wallis test, * P < 0.01.

a

Sample sizes: rad17N = 6 one isolate; tel1N = 6 one isolate; mad2N = 3 three isolates; ChrV rad17N = 3 three. isolates; ChrV mad2N = 3 two isolates, rad9N = 3 one isolate; rad9ERV14x2 N = 3 one isolate.