Table 2. Visual Field, Structural and Vascular Measurements Corresponding to the Affected and Intact Hemifields.
Variables | Healthy eyes (n = 28) | Glaucoma eyes (n = 58) | p-valueA | p-valueB | p-valueC | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Intact hemifield | Affected hemifield | |||||
SAP mean sensitivity (dB) | 30.0 ± 1.7 | 29.0 ± 1.8 | 26.0 ± 3.7 | 0.089‡ | <0.001* | <0.001§ |
SAP total deviation (dB) | 0.1 ± 1.4 | -0.1 ± 1.4 | -6.7 ± 6.4 | 0.076‡ | <0.001* | <0.001§ |
SAP pattern deviation (dB) | -1.3 ± 0.3 | -1.3 ± 0.3 | -7.3 ± 6.1 | 0.189‡ | <0.001* | <0.001§ |
Circumpapillary vessel density (%) | 62.4 ± 2.9 | 59.0 ± 3.1 | 54.7 ± 5.3 | <0.001‡ | <0.001‡ | <0.001† |
Perifoveal vessel density (%) | 53.8 ± 2.1 | 51.1 ± 2.4 | 48.3 ± 4.2 | <0.001‡ | <0.001‡ | <0.001† |
Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (μm) | 95.0 ± 8.2 | 83.6 ± 9.3 | 72.1 ±10.9 | <0.001‡ | <0.001* | <0.001§ |
Ganglion cell complex thickness (μm) | 92.4 ± 5.1 | 87.3 ± 5.8 | 74.7 ± 7.8 | 0.002‡ | <0.001* | <0.001§ |
Values are shown in mean ± standard deviation
Comparison between intact hemifield of glaucoma eyes and healthy eyes
Comparison between affected hemifield of glaucoma eyes and healthy eyes
Comparison between affected and intact hemifield of glaucoma eyes
The Comparison was performed by using independent samples t-test
The Comparison was performed by using paired t-test
The Comparison was performed by using Mann-Whitney U test.
The Comparison was performed by using Wilcoxon signed-rank test
SAP: standard automated perimetry; dB: decibel; μm: micrometer