Skip to main content
PMC home page
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1990 Nov;87(21):8627–8631. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.21.8627

Actin cores of hair-cell stereocilia support myosin motility.

G M Shepherd 1, D P Corey 1, S M Block 1
PMCID: PMC55010  PMID: 2236074

Abstract

The actin cores of hair-cell stereocilia were tested as a substrate for the movement of myosin-coated beads in an in vitro assay. Large numbers of stereocilia from bullfrog sacculi and semicircular canals were isolated by blotting onto coverglasses and were demembranated to expose the polar actin tracks of their cytoskeletal cores. Silica or polystyrene beads, coated with thick filaments of chicken skeletal muscle myosin, were added to this core preparation in the presence of ATP. Myosin-coated beads could reach some of the cores by diffusion alone, but the efficiency and precision of the assay were improved considerably by the use of "optical tweezers" (a gradient-force optical trap) to deposit the beads directly on the cores. Beads applied in this fashion bound and moved unidirectionally at 1-2 microns/s, escaping the retarding force of the trap. Actin filaments within the stereocilia are cross-linked by fimbrin, but this did not appear to interfere with the motility of myosin. Beads coated with optic-lobe kinesin were also tested for movement; these bound and moved unidirectionally at 0.1-0.2 microns/s when applied to microtubule-based kinociliary cores, but not when applied to actin-based stereociliary cores. Our results are consistent with, and lend support to, a model for hair cell adaptation in which a molecular motor such as myosin maintains tension on the mechanically gated transduction channels. Optical tweezers and video-enhanced differential interference contrast optics provide high efficiency and improved optical resolution for the in vitro analysis of myosin motility.

Full text

PDF
8627

Images in this article

8628Image
on p.8628
8628Image
on p.8628
8628Image
on p.8628
8628Image
on p.8628
8629Image
on p.8629
8629Image
on p.8629
8629Image
on p.8629

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ashkin A., Dziedzic J. M. Optical trapping and manipulation of viruses and bacteria. Science. 1987 Mar 20;235(4795):1517–1520. doi: 10.1126/science.3547653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ashkin A., Dziedzic J. M., Yamane T. Optical trapping and manipulation of single cells using infrared laser beams. Nature. 1987 Dec 24;330(6150):769–771. doi: 10.1038/330769a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Assad J. A., Hacohen N., Corey D. P. Voltage dependence of adaptation and active bundle movement in bullfrog saccular hair cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Apr;86(8):2918–2922. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.8.2918. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Block S. M., Blair D. F., Berg H. C. Compliance of bacterial flagella measured with optical tweezers. Nature. 1989 Apr 6;338(6215):514–518. doi: 10.1038/338514a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bretscher A. Fimbrin is a cytoskeletal protein that crosslinks F-actin in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Nov;78(11):6849–6853. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.11.6849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bretscher A., Weber K. Fimbrin, a new microfilament-associated protein present in microvilli and other cell surface structures. J Cell Biol. 1980 Jul;86(1):335–340. doi: 10.1083/jcb.86.1.335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Coleman T. R., Mooseker M. S. Effects of actin filament cross-linking and filament length on actin-myosin interaction. J Cell Biol. 1985 Nov;101(5 Pt 1):1850–1857. doi: 10.1083/jcb.101.5.1850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Collins K., Sellers J. R., Matsudaira P. Calmodulin dissociation regulates brush border myosin I (110-kD-calmodulin) mechanochemical activity in vitro. J Cell Biol. 1990 Apr;110(4):1137–1147. doi: 10.1083/jcb.110.4.1137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Corey D. P., Hudspeth A. J. Analysis of the microphonic potential of the bullfrog's sacculus. J Neurosci. 1983 May;3(5):942–961. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.03-05-00942.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Corey D. P., Hudspeth A. J. Kinetics of the receptor current in bullfrog saccular hair cells. J Neurosci. 1983 May;3(5):962–976. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.03-05-00962.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Corey D. P., Hudspeth A. J. Response latency of vertebrate hair cells. Biophys J. 1979 Jun;26(3):499–506. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(79)85267-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Drenckhahn D., Kellner J., Mannherz H. G., Gröschel-Stewart U., Kendrick-Jones J., Scholey J. Absence of myosin-like immunoreactivity in stereocilia of cochlear hair cells. Nature. 1982 Dec 9;300(5892):531–532. doi: 10.1038/300531a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Eatock R. A., Corey D. P., Hudspeth A. J. Adaptation of mechanoelectrical transduction in hair cells of the bullfrog's sacculus. J Neurosci. 1987 Sep;7(9):2821–2836. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.07-09-02821.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Egelman E. Problem of light piping in immunofluorescence studies. Nature. 1981 Dec 17;294(5842):674–674. doi: 10.1038/294674a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Flock A., Bretscher A., Weber K. Immunohistochemical localization of several cytoskeletal proteins in inner ear sensory and supporting cells. Hear Res. 1982 May;7(1):75–89. doi: 10.1016/0378-5955(82)90082-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Flock A., Cheung H. C. Actin filaments in sensory hairs of inner ear receptor cells. J Cell Biol. 1977 Nov;75(2 Pt 1):339–343. doi: 10.1083/jcb.75.2.339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Gelles J., Schnapp B. J., Sheetz M. P. Tracking kinesin-driven movements with nanometre-scale precision. Nature. 1988 Feb 4;331(6155):450–453. doi: 10.1038/331450a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Glenney J. R., Jr, Kaulfus P., Matsudaira P., Weber K. F-actin binding and bundling properties of fimbrin, a major cytoskeletal protein of microvillus core filaments. J Biol Chem. 1981 Sep 10;256(17):9283–9288. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Glenney J. R., Jr, Weber K. Calmodulin-binding proteins of the microfilaments present in isolated brush borders and microvilli of intestinal epithelial cells. J Biol Chem. 1980 Nov 25;255(22):10551–10554. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hacohen N., Assad J. A., Smith W. J., Corey D. P. Regulation of tension on hair-cell transduction channels: displacement and calcium dependence. J Neurosci. 1989 Nov;9(11):3988–3997. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.09-11-03988.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hirokawa N., Tilney L. G. Interactions between actin filaments and between actin filaments and membranes in quick-frozen and deeply etched hair cells of the chick ear. J Cell Biol. 1982 Oct;95(1):249–261. doi: 10.1083/jcb.95.1.249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Howard J., Hudspeth A. J. Compliance of the hair bundle associated with gating of mechanoelectrical transduction channels in the bullfrog's saccular hair cell. Neuron. 1988 May;1(3):189–199. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(88)90139-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Howard J., Hudspeth A. J. Mechanical relaxation of the hair bundle mediates adaptation in mechanoelectrical transduction by the bullfrog's saccular hair cell. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 May;84(9):3064–3068. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.9.3064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Hudspeth A. J. Extracellular current flow and the site of transduction by vertebrate hair cells. J Neurosci. 1982 Jan;2(1):1–10. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.02-01-00001.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Hudspeth A. J. How the ear's works work. Nature. 1989 Oct 5;341(6241):397–404. doi: 10.1038/341397a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Huxley A. F., Simmons R. M. Proposed mechanism of force generation in striated muscle. Nature. 1971 Oct 22;233(5321):533–538. doi: 10.1038/233533a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Huxley H. E. The mechanism of muscular contraction. Science. 1969 Jun 20;164(3886):1356–1365. doi: 10.1126/science.164.3886.1356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. KIELLEY W. W., HARRINGTON W. F. A model for the myosin molecule. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1960 Jul 15;41:401–421. doi: 10.1016/0006-3002(60)90037-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Kachar B. Direct visualization of organelle movement along actin filaments dissociated from characean algae. Science. 1985 Mar 15;227(4692):1355–1357. doi: 10.1126/science.4038817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Korn E. D., Hammer J. A., 3rd Myosins of nonmuscle cells. Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem. 1988;17:23–45. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.17.060188.000323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Kron S. J., Spudich J. A. Fluorescent actin filaments move on myosin fixed to a glass surface. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Sep;83(17):6272–6276. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.17.6272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Macartney J. C., Comis S. D., Pickles J. O. Is myosin in the cochlea a basis for active motility? Nature. 1980 Dec 4;288(5790):491–492. doi: 10.1038/288491a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Matsudaira P. T., Burgess D. R. Identification and organization of the components in the isolated microvillus cytoskeleton. J Cell Biol. 1979 Dec;83(3):667–673. doi: 10.1083/jcb.83.3.667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Mooseker M. S., Coleman T. R. The 110-kD protein-calmodulin complex of the intestinal microvillus (brush border myosin I) is a mechanoenzyme. J Cell Biol. 1989 Jun;108(6):2395–2400. doi: 10.1083/jcb.108.6.2395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Mooseker M. S., Tilney L. G. Organization of an actin filament-membrane complex. Filament polarity and membrane attachment in the microvilli of intestinal epithelial cells. J Cell Biol. 1975 Dec;67(3):725–743. doi: 10.1083/jcb.67.3.725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Neugebauer D. C., Thurm U. Chemical dissection of stereovilli from fish inner ear reveals differences from intestinal microvilli. J Neurocytol. 1984 Oct;13(5):797–808. doi: 10.1007/BF01148494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Pickles J. O., Comis S. D., Osborne M. P. Cross-links between stereocilia in the guinea pig organ of Corti, and their possible relation to sensory transduction. Hear Res. 1984 Aug;15(2):103–112. doi: 10.1016/0378-5955(84)90041-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Sheetz M. P., Block S. M., Spudich J. A. Myosin movement in vitro: a quantitative assay using oriented actin cables from Nitella. Methods Enzymol. 1986;134:531–544. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(86)34118-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Sheetz M. P., Chasan R., Spudich J. A. ATP-dependent movement of myosin in vitro: characterization of a quantitative assay. J Cell Biol. 1984 Nov;99(5):1867–1871. doi: 10.1083/jcb.99.5.1867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Sheetz M. P., Spudich J. A. Movement of myosin-coated fluorescent beads on actin cables in vitro. Nature. 1983 May 5;303(5912):31–35. doi: 10.1038/303031a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Shepherd G. M., Barres B. A., Corey D. P. "Bundle blot" purification and initial protein characterization of hair cell stereocilia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Jul;86(13):4973–4977. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.13.4973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Tilney L. G. Actin filaments in the acrosomal reaction of Limulus sperm. Motion generated by alterations in the packing of the filaments. J Cell Biol. 1975 Feb;64(2):289–310. doi: 10.1083/jcb.64.2.289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Tilney L. G., Derosier D. J., Mulroy M. J. The organization of actin filaments in the stereocilia of cochlear hair cells. J Cell Biol. 1980 Jul;86(1):244–259. doi: 10.1083/jcb.86.1.244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Tilney M. S., Tilney L. G., Stephens R. E., Merte C., Drenckhahn D., Cotanche D. A., Bretscher A. Preliminary biochemical characterization of the stereocilia and cuticular plate of hair cells of the chick cochlea. J Cell Biol. 1989 Oct;109(4 Pt 1):1711–1723. doi: 10.1083/jcb.109.4.1711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Vale R. D., Reese T. S., Sheetz M. P. Identification of a novel force-generating protein, kinesin, involved in microtubule-based motility. Cell. 1985 Aug;42(1):39–50. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(85)80099-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES