Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2017 Jul 7;12(7):e0181098. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181098

Morphological and transcriptomic evidence for ammonium induction of sexual reproduction in Thalassiosira pseudonana and other centric diatoms

Eric R Moore 1, Briana S Bullington 1, Alexandra J Weisberg 2, Yuan Jiang 3, Jeff Chang 2, Kimberly H Halsey 1,*
Editor: Douglas A Campbell4
PMCID: PMC5501676  PMID: 28686696

Abstract

The reproductive strategy of diatoms includes asexual and sexual phases, but in many species, including the model centric diatom Thalassiosira pseudonana, sexual reproduction has never been observed. Furthermore, the environmental factors that trigger sexual reproduction in diatoms are not understood. Although genome sequences of a few diatoms are available, little is known about the molecular basis for sexual reproduction. Here we show that ammonium reliably induces the key sexual morphologies, including oogonia, auxospores, and spermatogonia, in two strains of T. pseudonana, T. weissflogii, and Cyclotella cryptica. RNA sequencing revealed 1,274 genes whose expression patterns changed when T. pseudonana was induced into sexual reproduction by ammonium. Some of the induced genes are linked to meiosis or encode flagellar structures of heterokont and cryptophyte algae. The identification of ammonium as an environmental trigger suggests an unexpected link between diatom bloom dynamics and strategies for enhancing population genetic diversity.

Introduction

Diatoms are protists that form massive annual spring and fall blooms in aquatic environments and are estimated to be responsible for about half of photosynthesis in the global oceans [1]. This predictable annual bloom dynamic fuels higher trophic levels and initiates delivery of carbon into the deep ocean biome. Diatoms have complex life history strategies that are presumed to have contributed to their rapid genetic diversification into ~200,000 species [2] that are distributed between the two major diatom groups: centrics and pennates [3]. A defining characteristic of all diatoms is their restrictive and bipartite silica cell wall that causes them to progressively shrink during asexual cell division. At a critically small cell size and under certain conditions, auxosporulation restitutes cell size and prevents clonal death [46]. The entire lifecycles of only a few diatoms have been described and rarely have sexual events been captured in the environment [79].

So far, all centric diatoms appear to share the process of oogamous sexual reproduction (Fig 1). The average cell size of a population of asexually dividing diatoms decreases as a result of differential thecae inheritance. At a critically small size, cells become eligible to differentiate into male and female cells. Meiosis in the male spermatogonangium produces multinucleate spermatogonia that divide into individual haploid spermatocytes. Meiosis in the female oogonia produces a single functional haploid nucleus that is fertilized by a flagellated spermatocyte through an opening in the oogonia thecae. Fertilized oogonia expand into a large auxospore where new, large thecae are formed for the new, enlarged initial cell. Auxosporulation can also occur asexually, but it is considered an ancillary pathway for cell size restitution in diatom species that have a sexual path for reproduction [5].

Fig 1. The life cycle of a centric diatom.

Fig 1

The average cell size of a population of asexually dividing diatoms decreases as a result of differential thecae inheritance. At a critically small size, cells can initiate sexual reproduction and differentiate into male and female cells. Meiosis in the male spermatogonangium produces multinucleate spermatogonia that divide into individual haploid spermatocytes. Meiosis in the female oogonia produces a single functional haploid nucleus that is fertilized by a flagellated spermatocyte through an opening in the oogonia thecae. Fertilized oogonia expand into a large auxospore where new, large thecae are formed for the new initial cell.

The environmental factors that trigger formation of sexual cells and sexual reproduction in centric diatoms are not well understood [10, 11], but sexualization appears to be strongly associated with conditions causing synchronous sexuality in cells experiencing growth stress [12]. Besides the size threshold requirement, previous observations indicate that sexualization is possible when active growth has ceased, causing cell cycle arrest [13, 14] and cell densities are sufficient to permit successful fertilization of the oogonia by the spermatocyte [15]. Light interruption with an extended dark period [13], changing salinities, and nutrient shifts [16], have sometimes been successful in inducing sexual reproduction, probably by causing cell cycle arrest. Recently, pheromones produced by the pennate diatom, Seminavis robusta, have been identified that cause cell cycle arrest and induce the sexual pathway [17]. However, we are aware of no method that reliably causes induction of all of the sexual stages of centric diatoms shown in Fig 1.

The ecological importance of diatoms, combined with their potential uses in materials chemistry, drug delivery, biosensing [18, 19], and bioenergy [20, 21], prompted genome sequencing of T. pseudonana CCMP1335 (a ‘centric’ diatom collected from the North Atlantic Ocean) and Phaeodactulum tricornutum (a ‘pennate’ diatom), which have become model organisms for experimental studies [22, 23]. However, sexual morphologies have never been observed in either of these species or in the vast majority of diatoms [10]. The inability to reliably control the sexual cycle in centric diatoms has severely hindered studies to understand the silica deposition process, as well as the genetic regulation, ecology, and evolution of sex [10, 24, 25]. Both of the model diatoms were thought to have repurposed their extant genetic toolkits and lost the need and ability for a sexual lifestyle [10, 11, 26].

Here we show that two strains of T. pseudonana and two other centric species, T. weisflogii and Cyclotella cryptica, can be reliably induced into the sexual reproductive pathway when cells are below the critical size threshold and exposed to ammonium during the stationary phase of growth. Ammonium induced oogonia, auxospore, and spermatocyte formation in each of these species. Induction of sexuality was further supported by RNA sequencing (RNAseq) which revealed 1,274 genes whose expression patterns changed when T. pseudonana became sexualized by ammonium. Meiosis genes and genes associated with flagellar structures of heterokont and cryptophyte algae were differentially expressed in ammonium-induced cells compared to nitrate grown cells. We anticipate that this discovery will open opportunities to study the evolution of diatom lifecycles and facilitate expansion of diatom breeding to explore functional genetics for molecular ecology, nanotechnology and biofuels applications.

Results and discussion

Ammonium triggers sexual morphologies

We observed T. pseudonana CCMP1335 cell morphologies consistent with sexual reproduction when cells were propagated in artificial seawater medium supplemented with ammonium. The proportion of cells that differentiated into sexual cell types was dependent on ammonium concentration, with up to 39% of the population identified as oogonia or auxospores in cultures supplemented with 800 μM NH4Cl (Fig 2A). Oogonia and auxospores were first observed at the onset of stationary phase and reached maximum population proportions in late stationary phase (Fig 2A). Ammonium also induced oogonia and auxospore production in T. pseudonana CCMP1015 (collected from the North Pacific Ocean), T. weissflogii, and Cyclotella cryptica (S1 Fig). A few oogonia and auxospores were observed in nitrate grown cultures with no added ammonium (Fig 2A and S1 Fig). However, with the exception of nitrate grown C. cryptica cultures, which generated oogonia and auxospores constituting 11% of the total population, oogonia and auxospores were only a small percentage of the total population in nitrate-grown T. pseudonana and T. weissflogii. Even though auxospores can have diameters 3–4 times that of asexual cells, such small population proportions do not lead to discernable shifts in cell size distributions obtained by particle size analysis (e.g., Coulter counter, a commonly used method to assess population size). We initially observed auxospores when performing visual inspections using a light microscope of our cultures that were growing in ammonium. For the data reported here, oogonia and auxospores were quantified by manually counting the cell types using a hemocytometer. We suspect that reliance on laboratory instruments such as particle counters and flow cytometers in place of microscopic analysis is one reason that sexual morphologies in these well-studied diatom species have gone undetected until now. Laboratory stock cultures are typically maintained in media with low concentrations of nitrogen, especially when ammonium is supplied as the nitrogen source because it has been considered to be toxic to diatoms in high concentrations [27]. Therefore, it may not be surprising that sexual cells have gone un-noticed due to the low rates of sexual induction in the presence of low ammonium concentrations (Fig 2A).

Fig 2. Ammonium induces sexual morphologies in T. pseudonana CCMP1335.

Fig 2

(A) Proportion of sexual cells (oogonia and auxospores) relative to the total population in cultures of T. pseudonana grown in the presence of NH4Cl or NaNO3; n = 3 independent cultures, average of 300 cells counted per replicate. Oogonia and auxospores were only observed beginning in stationary phase, data are mean values, error bars are s.d.. Inset: corresponding growth curve linking the onset of stationary phase with first appearance of sexual cells on day six. (B) Sexual cells were observed in cultures with NH4Cl present at inoculation (blue hatched and solid blue bars) or following NH4Cl addition at the onset of stationary phase (yellow bars). Legend shows concentration of nitrogen source provided at inoculation and concentration of nitrogen source added at the time of the second dosing. Two control treatments were supplied 200 μM nitrogen source at inoculation only. Inset: corresponding growth curve showing the onset stationary phase and timing of 2nd nitrogen addition; n = 3 independent cultures, average of 281 cells counted per replicate, data are mean values, error bars are s.d..

Cells differentiated into oogonia and auxospores regardless of whether ammonium was supplied at inoculation or at the onset of stationary phase (Fig 1B). Thus, it appears that stationary phase and ammonium availability are key factors that trigger formation of sexual cells in centric diatoms. Resource depletion can arrest the cell cycle [14], and the presence of ammonium at the onset of stationary phase appears to activate the sexual cycle. Auxospore formation was observed in Cyclotella meneghiniana during stationary phase [28], and other protists initiate sex under stress in response to nutrient depletion or oxidative DNA damage [29]. Ammonium can inhibit photosynthesis [27]; however, diatoms, including T. pseudonana, can acclimate to millimolar ammonium concentrations [30]. It is possible that high ammonium concentrations intensify the stress condition required for the sexual pathway. Nevertheless, ammonium consistently caused formation of ten-fold more sexualized cells than the same concentrations of nitrate (Fig 2 and S1 Fig).

Our results showing that ammonium induced formation of sexual cells in several centric diatom species suggests that it may serve as a key environmental factor regulating the sexual lifecycle across centric diatoms. Ammonium is typically present in very low concentrations in aquatic ecosystems. However, ammonium reached 12.6 mM in a eutrophic lake where the centric diatom, Aulacoseira subarctica, was observed undergoing sexual reproduction [8]. Clearly, ammonium was not the growth-limiting nutrient under those conditions or in our laboratory cultures (Fig 2). Pseudo-nitzschia auxospore formation was positively correlated with ammonium, which was measured to be 14 μM during a major bloom event off the coast of Washington [7]. Thus, the formation of sexual cells appears to be triggered by the presence of ammonium while at least one other growth factor becomes limiting, such as light (discussed below), phosphorous, silica [7], vitamins, or trace elements.

Cell differentiation in T. pseudonana was induced irrespective of growth rate in exponential phase, light intensity, or light regime. However, the growth parameters did affect the proportion of differentiated cells. Oogonia and auxospores were only 0.5% of the population when grown under very low light (5 μE) with 200 μM NH4Cl and increased to 39% when grown under moderate light (100 μE) and 800 μM NH4Cl (Table 1). The proportions of oogonia and auxospores increased with light up to moderate intensities (70–100 μE) but decreased at high (220 μE) intensities (Table 1), suggesting that photon flux has an important role in meeting the energetic demands of sexual reproduction. Other work showed sexualization was more prevalent at light <50 μE [31] or with the addition of a dark period [13, 32, 33]. Likely, the optimum light intensity or need for a dark period to precede sexual induction [34] is species-specific and linked to adaptive life histories [5].

Table 1. Effects of growth parameters on induction of sexual reproduction in T. pseudonana CCMP1335, T. weissflogii and C. cryptica.

Oogonia and auxospores always appeared in stationary phase. The percentage of the total population (at least 300 cells counted per replicate) differentiated into oogonia or auxospores when grown in nitrate or ammonium is shown for the day they were at their maximum number; data are mean values ± s.d., biological replicates n = 3.

Species Light intensity (μE) Light regime Nitrogen concentration
(μM)
Specific growth rate (d-1) Oogonia and auxospores in NO3- (%) Oogonia and auxospores in NH4+ (%)
T. pseudonana 5 24 h 200 0.28 0.21 ± 0.22 0.52 ± 0.52
50 24 h 200 0.89 3.67 ± 0.55 7.67 ± 0.50
50 12 h/12 h L/D 200 0.80 0.67 ± 0.27 2.32 ± 0.52
220 24 h 200 1.2 0.26 ± 0.26 1.30 ± 0.91
70 24 h 800 0.98 3.01 ± 0.52 38.9 ± 0.04
C. cryptica 100 24 h 800 0.38 11.1 ± 2.27 37.6 ± 3.71
T. weissflogii 100 24 h 800 0.52 4.50 ± 2.36 39.8 ± 5.65

Visualization of sexual morphologies

Confocal, light, and scanning electron microscopy were used to document the cell morphologies at various stages in the life history cycle of T. pseudonana (Fig 3 and S2 Fig). Oogonia were elongated relative to asexually growing vegetative cells and exhibited a bent morphology and swelling of the plasma membrane at the junction of the hypotheca and epitheca (Fig 3B and 3C, S2B–S2D Fig). In oogonia, cellular contents became localized to the ends of the cell resulting in an apparent empty space near the area of membrane swelling where fertilization likely occurs [5].

Fig 3.

Fig 3

The life cycle stages of T. pseudonana (A-K), T. weissflogii (L) and C. cryptica (M-O) imaged using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), light (LM), and confocal microscopy (CFM). A: Two vegetative cells (LM, CCMP1335). B: Oogonium displaying separation of thecae (arrowhead) and putative pycnotic nucleus indicated by the arrow (CFM, CCMP1015). C: Oogonium sharply bending at the thecae junction. Arrowhead indicates protrusion of the plasma membrane (CFM, CCMP1335). Oogonia images are representative of 38 total images. D: Spermatogonium containing multiple spermatocytes seen as individual red (DNA stained) clusters (CFM, CCMP1335); representative of 8 images. E: Motile spermatocytes (in red, arrow) with moving flagella (arrowheads, CFM, CCMP1335, representative of 10 images). F-G: SEM images of spermatocytes (arrowhead) attached to early oogonia (SEM, CCMP1335, representative of 20 images). H,I: Auxospores; representative of 60 images in CCMP1015 (H, LM) and CCMP1335 (I, CFM) showing bulging where mother valve was attached (arrowhead). Two nuclei are visible in red following non-cytokinetic mitosis. J: Small parental cell (arrow) with initial cells produced by sexual reproduction to the left (partial valve view) and right (girdle view) indicated by the arrowheads (SEM, CCMP1335). K: 7 x 12 μm initial cell (LM); j and k representative of 12 images of CCMP1335. L: T. weissflogii auxospore (LM); representative of 12 similar images. M: C. cryptica spermatogonium (upper left) and vegetative cell (lower right). CFM shows stained DNA (red, arrow) and multiple nuclei in the spermatogonium. Arrowheads indicate chlorophyll autofluorescence (green). Oogonium (N, representative of 6 images) and auxospore (O, representative of 4 similar images) of C. cryptica (LM). Confocal microscopy images (b-e, i, m) show chlorophyll autofluorescence (green) and Hoescht 33342 stained DNA (red). Scale bars: A: 5 μm; B-E: 5 μm; F: 2 μm; G: 1 μm; H-O: 10 μm.

T. pseudonana spermatogonium harbored at least eight nuclei (Fig 3D), suggesting that a depauperating mitosis preceded meiosis [11, 35]. Sperm released were very small, about 1 μm, and flagellated (Fig 3E, S2E and S2F Fig), but they often became entangled with other cells and debris [8, 36, 37]. Sperm cells attached to oogonia at the junction of the thecae for fertilization (Fig 3F and 3G, S2I and S2J Fig) as shown in T. punctigera [38]. Also similar to T. punctigera, flagella were not visible at that stage, possibly because flagella are abandoned upon attachment to the oogonia [36].

Oogonia developed into auxospores and these conspicuous cell morphologies were always observed in cultures induced by ammonium. Auxospores were larger than vegetative cells and oogonia, ranging from about 6 to 20 μm in diameter, with most being 10–15 μm in diameter (Fig 3H and 3I, S2G and S2H and S2L Fig). Auxospores were spherical, with most of the cellular contents localized to one side (Fig 3H and 3I, S2G and S2H and S2L Fig) and sometimes showing slight distention where the mother valve was shed (Fig 3I), as described in Stephanodiscus niagarae [39]. Thecae remained attached in some cases, especially on smaller cells. Oogonia, auxospores, and spermatogonia in the other species studied displayed similar morphologies to those observed in T. pseudonana and other centric diatoms (Fig 3L–3O, S2M–S2P Fig, Fig 4A) [11, 16, 28, 33, 35, 37, 38, 40, 41].

Fig 4. Evidence for meiosis and initial cells.

Fig 4

A: 18s rRNA phylogeny of diatoms including pennates (pink rectangle), centrics (blue rectangle). Highlighted in red are the four strains induced into sexual reproduction in this study. Species for which some evidence already exists for sexual reproduction are starred [9, 13, 16, 28, 33, 38]. B-D: Changes in DNA and chlorophyll fluorescence in exponential (EXP), stationary (STA) and late stationary (L-STA) growth phases of T. pseudonana induced by ammonium; 30,000 events recorded, representative of two biological replicates. E: Coulter Counter distributions of cell diameter for T. pseudonana cultures in exponential phase of growth and maintained in NaNO3 (red) and after six successive 25% transfers to medium with ammonium (blue). Each new culture was allowed to remain in stationary phase for three days before the next 25% transfer was made. Single replicates of cultures with cell densities of 2.4 x 106 ml-1 (NaNO3) and 2.3 x 106 ml-1 (ammonium). Dashed lines are the mode for each peak.

Changes in DNA content in T. pseudonana cells induced into sexuality by ammonium were observed using flow cytometry-based analysis. Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis showed that as the culture progressed from exponential into stationary growth phases, the diploid population (Fig 4B) expanded to include DNA fluorescence intensities that were consistent with the presence of spermatogonangia and spermatogonia containing multiple gametes (Fig 4C). In late stationary phase, a new population was observed that had DNA fluorescence signals consistent with haploid sperm cells with little to no chlorophyll [13] (Fig 4D).

Cell size restitution via auxosporulation produced progeny cells that were considerably larger than the parent cells from nitrate stock cultures. To induce a high proportion of the eligible cells into the sexual pathway we repeatedly propagated cultures in 800 μM ammonium with inoculum of 25%. This strategy raises the ratio between the exposure of cells to ammonium in stationary phase and the total number of cell divisions. Our findings can be explained by assuming that cells in nitrate stock cultures are already at or below the critical size threshold for induction into sexuality, but with each passage through growth and stationary phases in batch culture, only a fraction of the eligible cells are induced into the sexual cycle. The average cell diameters of the resulting cultures were larger relative to stock cultures maintained in nitrate (Fig 4E, S3 Fig). The T. pseudonana initial cells were 7–12 μm, the largest size reported for this species (Fig 3J and 3K, S2K Fig). Presuming that cell size reduction during vegetative growth occurs in T. pseudonana, this process of cell size reduction and cell size restitution via ammonium induction have opposing influences on the average size of populations. These processes confound the ability to observe the impacts of sexual induction without experimental designs that maximize the percentage of the population induced into the sexual pathway and minimize the number of vegetative replications between episodes of induction.

We identified oogonia, male gametes, auxospores, and initial cells in cultures of the model centric diatom, T. pseudonana providing new evidence for sexuality in this species that was previously assumed to be asexual [10]. Although cell enlargement through asexual/apomictic mechanisms has been recorded in other species [4244], the presence of all sexual cell types, and the expression of meiotic genes (discussed below), suggest apomixis is not the mechanism being used by T. pseudonana for cell enlargement. Furthermore, apomixis typically occurs in species that also undergo sexual reproduction [5]. Only spermatogenesis had previously been reported in T. weissflogii [13, 45], but we have now also documented induction of oogonia and auxospores by ammonium and subsequent formation of initial cells in this species. A major challenge in visualizing the morphological characteristics of these species is their smaller cell sizes compared to other species for which morphological details have been documented. Now that we have determined a reliable method for inducing the sexual morphologies, future studies will dissect additional details associated with the sexual pathways in these, and perhaps other species inducible by ammonium, to determine their variation from other centric diatoms. For example, the presence of auxospore scales, precise timing of fertilization and meiotic activity, repeated auxosporulation, and polyspermy events (e.g., [38]). The case of T. pseudonana also presents interesting questions about whether this species has retained the ability to reduce in cell size. It appears that T. pseudonana has the capacity to avoid clonal death by maintaining a relatively constant cell size (3–9 μM) [4648]. Our experiments show that cells in this size range are inducible into the sexual pathway. Nevertheless, the question remains whether the progeny of induced small cells of T. pseudonana are capable of cell size reduction.

Gene expression analysis of ammonium induced sexual morphologies

We used RNAseq to identify genes that were differentially expressed in conditions that triggered cell differentiation into sexual morphologies. We compared the transcriptomes of T. pseudonana harvested in exponential (EXP), stationary (STA), and late stationary phases (L-STA). Cells were grown in 100 μM NaNO3 or, to capture a dose-dependent change in gene expression, either 100 or 800 μM NH4Cl (S4 Fig). We identified genes that were significantly differentially expressed in multiple pairwise comparisons of growth phases and nitrogen sources (S1A–S1K Table). Next, we examined the statistical interactions of pairwise condition comparisons to identify genes with significantly greater or lesser magnitude changes in expression between growth stages in the presence of ammonium relative to 100 μM NaNO3 (Fig 5A, S5 Fig).

Fig 5. Transcriptomic evidence for sexual reproduction in T. pseudonana.

Fig 5

A: Heat map of 89 genes having annotated functions that were differentially expressed during differentiation and sexual reproduction in T. pseudonana CCMP1335. Color indicates normalized expression value (FPKM) for each nitrogen treatment (control = 100 μM NO3-; 100NH4 = 100 μM NH4+; 800NH4 = 800 μM NH4+) and growth phase (EXP, STA, L-STA). B: FPKM values of select genes across growth phases for each nitrogen treatment.

This conservative approach yielded a total of 1,274 genes in the four analyses of statistical interactions (S1L–S1O Table). A total of 89 of the genes have an annotated function (Fig 5A, S1P Table). The set of 89 genes includes four meiotic genes (mcm2, mcm8, mcm9, and mlh1, Fig 4B, S6 Fig) that were also up-regulated in pennate diatoms during sexual reproduction [26]. The Mcm family of DNA helicases function in DNA replication, with mcm8, mcm9, and mlh1 having roles in double stranded break repair [4951]. Mcm8 was one of the four genes related to meiosis that were upregulated in the pennate diatom, Seminavis robusta during treatment with a sex-inducing pheromone [17]. Eight genes in our list are homologous to yeast genes involved in meiosis [52] (Fig 5B, S1Q Table), including genes that regulate the meiotic anaphase promoting complex (cdc16, cdc23, ama1) [53, 54] and rad54, a motor protein that regulates branch migration of Holliday junctions during homologous recombination [55]. Expression of genes encoding other RAD proteins (rad50 and rad 51) increased in pennate diatoms induced into meiosis [17, 26].

Of three ‘sexually induced genes’ that were up-regulated in T. weissflogii at the initiation of gametogenesis [45] and associated with sperm flagella mastigonemes [56], one, sig3, was significantly up-regulated in stationary phase compared to exponential phase (Fig 5B). In addition, a gene encoding an intraflagellar transport protein (IFT88) was also up-regulated in ammonium induced cells during stationary phase (Fig 5B). An IFT system is required for flagellar assembly [57] and five genes encoding IFT particle proteins, including IFT88, and a kinesin-associated protein involved in anterograde transport were found in the T. pseudonana genome [58]. The genes encoding Sig3 and IFT88 are unique to flagellar structures, and their differential expression in ammonium induced T. pseudonana compared to the nitrate-grown control treatments provide additional evidence that ammonium induced spermatogenesis in this species.

The MYB factor and bZIP families of proteins are transcriptional regulators that control a variety of cell processes including stress responses, development, and differentiation in plants [59]. Expression of two genes having the characteristic R2R3 MYB DNA binding domains common in plants, myb24 and myb16, was generally lower in ammonium induced cultures compared to the nitrate grown controls (Fig 5B). In Arabidopsis thaliana, hormonal activation of myb24 is required for stamen development and male fertility [60]. Whether myb24, myb16, and bzip2 play roles in regulating gamete development or sex differentiation in diatoms remains to be determined.

The 1,274 genes provide new avenues to understand the evolution of sexuality in the Heterokont eukaryotic lineage. Diatoms emerged ~ 200 Mya, about 800 My after a eukaryotic heterotroph engulfed a red alga in the secondary endosymbiosis event that gave rise to the SAR eukaryotic supergroup [61]. Of 171 diatom genes of red algal origin [61], 17 were identified as differentially expressed in conditions that induced sexual reproduction (S1R Table). None of these genes are annotated in the T. pseudonana genome, but in red algae they are predicted to function in transport and plastid-targeted processes [23].

Conclusions

That some of the most well studied centric diatoms were never observed undergoing sexual reproduction was a mystery. Possibly even more elusive was the ability to reliably control or induce the sexual pathway of centric diatoms in the laboratory [10] despite a myriad of efforts that ranged from sweet-talk to torture. Factors that have limited progress in this field center on the problem that even under ‘favorable environmental conditions’ that result in the sexual lifecycle, only a fraction of cells undergo sexual reproduction (Fig 2). Thus, capturing the sexual event requires near constant visual observation because (a) only cells that have become sufficiently small and reach the critical size threshold can undergo sexual reproduction [62], (b) only a fraction of those size-eligible cells may undergo sexual reproduction [8, 15, 16, 31], (c) there has been a lack of understanding about what constitutes conditions that are ‘favorable’ for triggering diatom sex [5, 7], and (d) morphological changes indicative of sex may not be recognized by untrained scientists [63].

Our results provide strong evidence that T. pseudonana is a sexual organism, expressing the major morphologies associated with the sexual pathway that result in enlarged initial cells. Furthermore, the sexual pathway was reliably induced in T. pseudonana, and two other centric diatom species by exposure of size-eligible cells to ammonium. Ammonium triggered formation of sexual cells in a dose-dependent manner and significant changes in expression of genes involved in meiosis, spermatocyte flagellar structures and assembly, and sex differentiation. RNAseq analysis revealed many more genes with unknown functions that were expressed under conditions of sexual differentiation. Other genes involved in sex are likely to have been missed by our analysis because their changes in expression were masked by the mixed population of asexual and sexual cells, or they were not captured in the coarse time-resolution of sampling used in this study. Nevertheless, our discoveries resolve two persistent mysteries that have plagued diatom researchers. Furthermore, the RNAseq data provide a subset of genes that can be used to study the molecular ecology of diatoms.

The ecology of centric diatom sexual reproduction that can be inferred from our findings appears best described as synchronous sexuality [12] triggered by ammonium in cells experiencing growth stress. Asexual cell cycle arrest appears to be prerequisite to activation of the diatom sexual life cycle [13, 14, 28, 29]. In the environment, diatoms bloom following elevated nutrient concentrations driven by vertical mixing, coastal upwelling, or river inputs and the bloom reaches its peak biomass when essential nutrients are depleted. Within a week, the bulk of a bloom can be consumed by heterotrophic protists [64] that excrete ammonium to maintain homeostatic elemental composition [65]. We propose that ammonium released by grazers at bloom climax may be a principal ecological trigger for sexual morphologies in centric diatoms. Synchronization of sexuality at the onset of resource depletion (stationary phase) increases the chances for successful fertilization because cell density is at its maximum [12]. Environmental concentrations of ammonium in the environment rarely reach the concentrations used in this study to demonstrate the dose response effect on sexuality. Other methods that have sometimes successfully triggered sexual reproduction in other species are similarly unusual compared to environmental conditions. For example, the magnitude of the salinity shifts used to induce sexual reproduction in Skeletonema marioni in the laboratory do not occur in the Baltic sea [16]. Nevertheless, pulses of ammonium, shifts in salinity, and other environmental fluctuations do occur in aquatic ecosystems, and provided the other conditions for sexuality are met (e.g., cell size threshold, stress, population density), are likely to induce sexuality in at least a small fraction of a population. The presence of ammonium and the onset of stationary phase also point to involvement of another growth factor whose depletion triggers sexual reproduction. The specific collection of factors that lead to sexual reproduction in diatoms in the environment is not yet known and neither is whether ammonium is a direct or indirect trigger of sexuality [4]. Nevertheless, this work suggests an intriguing ecological role for ammonium in the mechanisms underlying sexuality in centric diatoms and will certainly be a valuable tool to control sexuality in the laboratory.

The identification of ammonium as a reliable inducer of sexuality in T. pseudonana and other centric diatoms has the potential to shift perspectives on diatom ecology, open avenues for the experimental investigation of diatom reproductive mechanisms, and provide tools for genetic manipulation of centric diatoms that have not heretofore been available. Diatom blooms have a global impact but the factors that control these blooms and their demise are complex and a consensus has not been reached about these processes. Our evidence suggests that induction of sexuality may play a vital role in diatom bloom conclusion and the production of genetic diversity that seeds future blooms [66]. Our analysis suggests an involvement of genes of red-algal origin, providing new lines of evolutionary enquiry. Interest in diatoms for biotechnological applications is high due to their uses in biofuels, materials chemistry and medicine. Our work will likely propel this exploration by enabling improved breeding and genetic modification to control and understand unique diatom traits.

Materials and methods

Stock cultures of T. pseudonana (CCMP1335) were maintained in f/2 medium [67] with 200 μM NaNO3 under continuous sub-saturating light at 18°C. Sexual cells were quantified in triplicate cultures of T. pseudonana (CCMP1335 and CCMP1015), T. weissflogii (CCMP1336) and C. cryptica (CCMP332) (all obtained from NCMA) grown in f/2 amended with NaNO3 or NH4Cl and grown at 18°C under 50 μE continuous light, or under variable light intensities/cycles as shown in Table 1. Cell populations were quantified using a Coulter counter (Beckman-Coulter, Indianapolis, Indiana). Oogonia and auxospores were counted using a hemocytometer.

We found that a modified f/2 medium yielded better cell images using light and confocal microscopy. This medium contained 0.939 mM KCl, 0.802 mM NO3-, 1 mM NH4Cl, 0.05 mM glycine, 0.01 mM methionine, 0.078 mM pyruvate, 0.84 μM pantothenate, 0.985 μM 4-amino-5-hydroxymethyl-2-methylpyrimidine, 0.3 μM thiamine, 0.002 μM biotin, 0.117 μM FeCl3*6H2O, 0.009 μM MnCl2*4H2O, 0.0008 μM ZnSO4*7H2O, 0.0005 μM CoCl2*6H2O, 0.0003 μM Na2MoO4*2H2O, 0.001 μM Na2SeO3, and 0.001 μM NiCl2*6H2O, and sparged with filter-sterilized carbon dioxide and air for 8 hours and overnight respectively. To view DNA, 1 ml live samples were stained with 5 μl 1.62 μM Hoescht 33342 (0.2 μm filtered) for 10 min. For scanning electron microscopy (SEM), 1 ml samples were diluted 1:3 with sterile f/2 and syringe filtered onto 13 mm 0.2 μm polycarbonate filters using a Swinnex filter unit. The filter was washed with 4 ml f/2 containing 0.5% gluteraldehyde and left submerged for at least 24 hours, followed by a series of 4 ml washes: 0.2 μm filtered 80%, 60%, 40%, 20% and 0% f/2, followed by 20%, 40%, 60% 80% and 100% ethanol, before critical point drying. SEM imaging was done at the Oregon State University Electron Microscope facility.

For flow cytometry 1 ml culture samples were fixed with 1 μl gluteraldehyde (50%) and stained with 10 μl Sybr green mix (1:25 dilution Sybr green in 0.01M Tris-EDTA, pH 8.0) for 30 min. Samples were run on a FACScan flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey). Settings were FL1 = 582 and FL3 = 450 for unstained cells and FL1 = 450 and FL3 = 450 for stained cells.

For RNAseq analysis, 1.61x108–1.10x109 cells from triplicate independent cultures were filtered onto 0.8 μm 47 mm polycarbonate filters during exponential, stationary and late stationary phases and flash frozen in liquid nitrogen. RNA was extracted using a Qiagen RNeasy midi kit according to modified manufacturer’s instructions [68]. Silica beads (0.5 mm) were added to the cells and lysis buffer and vortexed until homogeneous before being filtered through Qiashredder columns to remove large particles. Eluted RNA was subjected to off column RNase free DNase I treatment and secondary purification according to manufacturer’s recommendations. Total RNA was prepared and sequenced as a 150 bp single end library on an Illumina HiSeq 3000 at the Center for Genome Research and Biocomputing at Oregon State University. Sequencing data/interaction analyses were conducted using the Ballgown pipeline [69]. Sequencing reads were trimmed to remove sequencing adapters using BBDuk v. with the parameters " ktrim = r k = 23 mink = 9 hdist = 1 minlength = 100 tpe tbo" [70]. Reads aligned to the T. pseudonana reference genome (NCBI accession GCA_000149405.2) using HISAT2 v. 2.0.4 with the parameters "—min-intronlen 20—max-intronlen 1500—rna-strandness F—dta-cufflinks" [71]. Transcripts were assembled for each dataset and merged using Stringtie v 1.2.4 [72]. Pairwise differential expression analyses for genes were performed using the “stattest” function in Ballgown version 2.2.0 [73]. Interaction effects were tested by comparing the models with (timepoint + treatment + timepoint * treatment) and without (timepoint + treatment) the interaction term using the custom model option in the “stattest” function.

For construction of the phylogenetic tree, 18s rRNA sequences were obtained from the Silva database and aligned using Muscle v3.8.31 (default settings) [74]. A genome editor (BioEdit) was used to manually trim off overhanging sequence. The tree was built using RAxML-HPC v8.0.26 using the GTRCAT model, “-f a” option, and 1000 bootstrap replicates [75]. A visual representation was created using the TreeDyn [76] tool through LIRMM (phylogeny.fr) [77].

All RNAseq data have been deposited to NCBI under BioProject ID PRJNA391000.

Supporting information

S1 Fig

Ammonium induces sexual morphologies in T. weissflogii (A) and C. cryptica (B). Proportion of sexual cells (oogonia and auxospores) relative to the total population in cultures supplemented with NH4Cl or NaNO3. An average of 120 and 107 cells were counted per replicate of T. weissflogii and C. cryptica, respectively, throughout the growth curve, but oogonia and auxospores were only observed beginning in stationary phase; independent cultures n = 3, data are mean values, error bars are s.d.. Inset: corresponding growth curve linking the onset of stationary phase with first appearance of sexual cells on day 10 (A) and 17 (B).

(TIF)

S2 Fig

The different life stages in T. pseudonana (A-L), T. weissflogii (M,N) and C. cryptica (O,P). A: SEM of vegetative cells (CCMP1335). B-D: SEM (B) and CFM images of CCMP1335 oogonia, displaying separation of the thecae and expansion of the membrane. E: CFM image of flagellated spermatocytes with stained DNA (arrowheads), F, G. Epifluorescence (F) and LM images of the same view. In F, an active, flagellated spermatocyte (arrowhead) possibly associated with an auxospore surface is revealed by lateral light from fluorescence of DNA (blue) and chlorophyll (red). H,L: Auxospores of CCMP1015 and CCMP1335 respectively (CFM). I,J: Individual spermatocytes attached to oogonia (SEM). K: Initial cells of T. pseudonana CCMP1335 (LM). M,N: T. weissflogii vegetative cells (M; LM) and auxospore (N; LM). O,P: C. cryptica oogonia (O; LM) and auxospores (P; LM). CFM images (C-E, H, L) show fluorescence of DNA in red and chlorophyll in green.

(TIF)

S3 Fig

Coulter Counter distributions of cell diameter for T. weissflogii (A) and C. cryptica (B) cultures in exponential phases of growth and maintained in NaNO3 (red) and after two successive 25% transfers to media with ammonium (blue), Each new culture was allowed to remain in stationary phase for three days before the next 25% transfer was made. Single replicates. Dashed lines are the mode for each peak. Cell densities in (A) are 2.2 x 105 ml-1 (NaNO3) and 3.3 x 105 ml-1 (ammonium) and (B) are 1.6 x 106 ml-1 (NaNO3) and 2.2 x 106 ml-1 (ammonium).

(TIF)

S4 Fig. T. pseudonana CCMP1335 growth and collection for RNAseq analysis.

Three independent cultures of each nitrogen treatment were harvested 3, 5, and 8 days after inoculation (down arrows) in exponential (EXP), stationary (STA) and late stationary phases (L-STA). The 100uM NH4+ STA treatment did not yield sufficient RNA for analysis.

(TIF)

S5 Fig. Interaction analysis workflow of RNAseq data.

Growth phase A vs. B is EXP vs. STA, EXP vs. L-STA, or STA vs. L-STA, respectively. Δexp is the magnitude of change in gene expression between growth phases for the different nitrogen treatments.

(TIF)

S6 Fig. Expression values (FPKM) of 15 selected genes across the three growth phases for each nitrogen treatment.

(TIF)

S1 Table. Pairwise comparisons, interaction analyses, genes with annotated functions, homologues to yeast meiotic genes, and genes of red algal origin.

A-K: Genes that were significantly differentially expressed in multiple pairwise comparisons of growth phases and nitrogen sources. L-O: Genes with significantly greater or lesser magnitude changes in expression between growth stages in the presence of ammonium relative to 100 μM NaNO3 identified via statistical interactions of pairwise condition comparisons. P: Genes that were identified as differentially expressed in conditions that triggered cell differentiation and sexual reproduction and have annotated functions. Q: Genes that were identified as differentially expressed in conditions that triggered cell differentiation and sexual reproduction and are homologous to yeast genes involved in meiosis. R: Genes that were identified as differentially expressed in conditions that triggered cell differentiation and sexual reproduction and are of red algal origin.

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Kelsey McBeain for assistance with confocal microscopy imaging and the Electron Microscope Facility at Oregon State University for scanning electron micrographs.

Data Availability

All RNAseq data have been deposited to the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) under BioProject ID PRJNA391000.

Funding Statement

The authors received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.Nelson DM, Tréguer P, Brzezinski MA, Leynaert A, Quéguiner B. Production and dissolution of biogenic silica in the ocean: Revised global estimates, comparison with regional data and relationship to biogenic sedimentation Biogeochem Cycles. 1995;9(3):359–72. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Mann DG. The species concept in diatoms. Phycologia. 1999;38:437–95. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Simonsen R. The diatom system: Ideas on phylogeny. Bacillaria. 1979;2:9–71. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lewis WM. The diatom sex clock and its evolutionary importance. Amer Naturalist. 1984;123:73–80. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Chepurnov VA, Mann DG, Sabbe K, Vyverman W. Experimental studies on sexual reproduction in diatoms In: Jeon KW, editor. A Survey of Cell Biology. International Review of Cytology. 237 London, UK: Elsevier Academic Press; 2004. p. 91–154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Drebes. Sexuality In: Werner D, editor. The Biology of Diatoms. Botanical Monographs. 13 Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications; 1977. p. 250–83. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Holtermann KE, Bates SS, Trainer VL, Odell A, Armbrust EV. Mass sexual reproduction in the toxigenic diatoms Pseudo-Nitzscia australis and P. pungens (Bacillariophyceaea) on the Washington coast, USA. J Phycol. 2010;46:41–52. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2009.00792.x [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Jewson DH. Size reduction, reproductive strategy and the life cycle of a centric diatom. Philos T R Soc B. 1992;336:191–213. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Koester JA, Brawley SH, Karp-Boss L, Mann DG. Sexual reproduction in the marine centric diatom Ditylum brightwellii (Bacillariophyta). Eur J Phycol. 2008;42(4):351–66. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Chepurnov VA, Mann DG, von Dassow P, Vanormelingen P, Gillard J, Inze D, et al. In search of new tractable diatoms for experimental biology. BioEssays. 2008;30:692–702. doi: 10.1002/bies.20773 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Von Dassow P, Montresor M. Unveiling the mysteries of phytoplankton life cycles: patterns and opportunities behind complexity. J Plankton Res. 2011;33(1):3–12. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Edlund MB, Stoermer EF. Ecological, evolutionary, and systematic significance of diatom life histories. J Phycol. 1997;33:897–918. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Armbrust EV, Chisholm SW, Olson RJ. Role of light and the cell cycle on the induction of spermatogenesis in a centric diatom. J Phycol. 1990;26(3):470–8. doi: 10.1111/j.0022-3646.1990.00470.x [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Huysman MJJ, Vyverman W, De Veylder L. Molecular regulation of the diatom cell cycle. J Exp Bot. 2014;65(10):2573–84. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ert387 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Assmy P, Henjes J, Smetacek V, Montresor M. Auxospore formation in the silica-sinking oceanic diatom Fragilariopsis kerguelensis (Bacillariophyceae). J Phycol. 2006;42:1002–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Godhe A, Kremp A, Montresor M. Genetic and microscopic evidence for sexual reproduction in the centric diatom Skeletonema marinoi. Protist. 2014;165(4):401–16. doi: 10.1016/j.protis.2014.04.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Moeys S, Frenkel J, Lembke C, Gillard JTF, Devos V, Van den Berge K, et al. A sex-inducing pheromone triggers cell cycle arrest and mate attraction in the diatom Seminavis robusta. Sci Reports. 2016;6:19252 doi: 10.1038/srep19252 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ezzati J, Dolatabadi N, de la Guardia M. Applications of diatoms and silica nanotechnology in biosensing, drug and gene delivery, and formation of complex metal nanostructures. J Analyt Chem. 2011;30(9):1538–48. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kroth P. Molecular biology and the biotechnological potential of diatoms. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2007;616:23–33. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-75532-8_3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.d'Ippolito G, Sardo A, Paris D, Vella FM, Adelfi MG, Botte P, et al. Potential of lipid metabolism in marine diatoms for biofuel production. Biotechnology for Biofuels. 2015;8:28–38. doi: 10.1186/s13068-015-0212-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hildebrand D, Smith SR, Traller JC, Abbriano RM. The place of diatoms in the biofuels industry. Biofuels. 2012;3(2):221–40. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Armbrust EV, Berges JA, Bowler C, Green BR, Martinez D, Putnam NH, et al. The genome of the diatom Thalassiosira pseudonana: Ecology, evolution, and metabolism. Science. 2004;306:79–86. doi: 10.1126/science.1101156 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Bowler CB, Allen AE, Badger JH, Grimwood J, Jabbari K, Kuo A, et al. The Phaeodactylum genome reveals the evolutionary history of diatom genomes. Nature. 2008;456(7219):239–44. doi: 10.1038/nature07410 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Chepurnov VA, Chaerle P, Roef L, Van Meirhaeghe A, Vanhoutte K. Classical breeding in diatoms: Scientific background and practical perspectives Diatom Biology. Cellular Origin, Life in Extreme Habitats and Astrobiology. 19: Springer; 2011. p. 167–94. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Apt KE, Kroth-Pancic PG, Grossman A. Stable nuclear transformation of the diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum. Mol Gen Genet. 1996;252(5):572–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Patil S, Moeys S, Von Dassow P, Huysman MJJ, Mapleson D, De Veylder L, et al. Identification of the meitic toolkit in diatoms and exploration of meiosis-specific SPO11 and RAD51 homologs in the sexual species Pseudo-nitzchia multistriata and Seminavis robusta. BMC Genomics. 2015;2015(930). doi: 10.1186/s12864-015-1983-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Yoshiyama K, Sharp JH. Phytoplankton response to nutrient enrichment in an urbanized estuary: Apparent inhibition of primary production by overeutrophication. Limnol Oceanogr. 2006;51(1, part 2):424–34. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hoops HJ, Floyd GL. Ultrastructure of the centric diatom, Cyclotella meneghiniana: vegetative cell and auxospore development. Phycologia. 1979;18:424–35. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Bernstein H, Bernstein C. Evolutionary origin of recombination during meiosis. BioScience. 2010;60(7):498–505. doi: 10.1525/bio.2010.60.7.5 [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Collos Y, Harrison PJ. Acclimation and toxicity of high ammonium concentrations to unicellular alage. Mar Poll Bull. 2014;80(1–2):8–23. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2014.01.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Mouget J-L, Gastineau R, Davidovich O, Gaudin P, Davidovich NA. Light is a key factor in triggering sexual reproduction in the pennate diatom Haslea ostrearia. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2009;69(2):194–201. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2009.00700.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Vaulot D, Chisholm SW. A simple model for the growth of phytoplankton populations in light/dark cycles. J Plankton Res. 1987;9:345–66. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Mills KE, Kaczmarska I. Autogamic reproductive behavior and sex cell structure in Thalassiosira angulata (Bacillariophyta). Botanica March 2006;49:417–30. doi: 10.1515/BOT.2006.053 [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Gillard J, Devos V, Huysman MJJ, De Veylder L, D'Hondt S, Martens C, et al. Physiological and transcriptomic evidence for a close coupling between chloroplast ontogeny and cell cycle progression in the pennate diatom Seminavis robusta. Plant Physiol. 2008;148:1394–411. doi: 10.1104/pp.108.122176 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kaczmarska I, Poulíčková A, Sato S, Edlund MB, Idei M, Watanabe T, et al. Proposals for a terminology for diatom sexual reproduction, auxospores and resting stages. J Diatom Res. 2013;28(3):263–94. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.French III FW, Hargraves PE. Spore formation in the life cycles of the diatoms Chaetoceros diadema and Leptocylindrus danicus. J Phycol. 1985;21:477–83. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Idei M, Osada K, Sato S, Toyoda K, Nagumo T, Mann DG. Gametogenesis and auxospore development in Actinocyclus (Bacillariophyta). PLOS One. 2012;7(8):e41890 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041890 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Chepurnov VA, Mann DG, Von Dassow P, Armbrust EV, Sabbe K, Dasseville R, et al. Oogamous reproduction, with two-step auxosporulation, in the centric diatom Thalassiosira punctigera (Bacillariophyta). J Phycol. 2006;42:845–58. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2006.00244.x [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Edlund MB, Stoermer EF. Sexual reproduction in Stephanodiscus niagarae (Bacillariophyta). J Phycol. 1991;27:780–93. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Idei M, Sato S, Nagasato C, Motomura T, Toyoda K, Nagumo T, et al. Spermatogenesis and auxospore structure in the multipolar centric diatom Hydrosera. J Phycol. 2015;51(1):144–58. doi: 10.1111/jpy.12261 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Shirokawa Y, Shimada M. Sex allocation pattern of the diatom Cyclotella meneghiniana. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2013;280(1761):20130503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Nagai S, Hori Y, Manabe T, Imai I. Restoration of cell size by vegetative cell enlargement in Coscinodiscus wailesii (Bacillariophyceae). Phycologia. 1995;34(6):533–5. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Sabbe K. Apomixis in Achnanthes (Bacillariophyceae); development of a model system for diatom reproductive biology. Eur J Phycol. 2004;39:327–41. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Gallagher JC. Cell Enlargement in Skeletonema costatum (Bacillariophyceae). J Phycol. 1983;19:539–42. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Armbrust EV. Identification of a new gene family expressed during the onset of sexual reproduction in the centric diatom Thalassiosira weissflogii. Appl Environ Micriobiol. 1999;65:3121–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Hildebrand M, Frigeri LG, Davis AK. Synchronized growth of Thalassiosira pseudonana (Bacillariophyceae) provides novel insights into cell-wall synthesis processes in relation to the cell cycle. J Phycol. 2007;43:730–40. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Hildebrand M, York E, Kelz JI, Davis AK, Frigeri LG, Allison DP, et al. Nanoscale control of silica morphology and three-dimensional structure during diatom cell wall formation. J Mater Res. 2006;21(10):2689–98. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Round FE. The problem of size reduction in diatoms. Nova Hedwig. 1972;23:291–303. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Lutzmann M, Grey C, Traver S, Ganier O, Maya-Mendoza A, Ranisavljevic N, et al. MCM8- and MCM9-deficient mice reveal gametogenesis defects and genome instability due to impaired homologous recombination. Mol Cell. 2012;47(4):523–34. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.05.048 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Park J, Long DT, Lee KY, Abbas T, Shibata E, Negishi M, et al. The MCM8-MCM9 complex promotes RAD51 recruitment at DNA damage sites to facilitate homologous recombination. Mol Cell Biol. 2013;33(8):1632–44. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01503-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Baker SM, Plug AW, Prolla TA, Bronner CE, Harris AC, Yao X, et al. Involvement of mouse Mlh1 in DNA mismatch repair and meiotic crossing over. Nat Genet. 1996;13(3):336–42. doi: 10.1038/ng0796-336 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Butler G, Rasmussen MD, Lin MF, Santos MAS, Sakthikumar S, Munro CA, et al. Evolution of pathogenicity and sexual reproduction in eight Candida genomes. Nature. 2009;459:657–62. doi: 10.1038/nature08064 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Cooper KF, Mallory JJ, Egeland DB, Jarnik M, Strich R. Ama1p is a meiosis-specific regulator of the anaphase promoting complex/cyclosome in yeast. PNAS. 2000;97(26):14548–53. doi: 10.1073/pnas.250351297 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Zachariae W, Shevchenko A, Andrews PD, Ciosk R, Galova M, Stark MJR, et al. Mass spectrometric analysis of the anaphase-promoting complex from yeast: Identificaiton of a subunit related to cullins. Science. 1998;279(5354):1216–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Mazin AV, Mazina OM, Bugreev DV, Rossi MJ. Rad54, the motor of homologous recombination. DNA Repair. 2010;9(3):286–302. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2009.12.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Honda D, Shono T, Kimura K, Fujita S, Iseki M, Makino Y, et al. Homologs of the sexually induced gene 1 (sig1) product constitute the Stramenopile mastigonemes. Protist. 2007;158(1):77–88. doi: 10.1016/j.protis.2006.08.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Rosenbaum JL, Witman GB. Intraflagellar transport. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2002;3:813–25. doi: 10.1038/nrm952 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Merchant SS, Prochnik SE, Vallon O, Harris EH, Karpowicz SJ, Witman GB, et al. The Chlamydomonas genome reveals the evolution of key animal and plant functions. Science. 2007;318(5848):245–50. doi: 10.1126/science.1143609 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Ambawat S, Sharma P, Yadav NR, Yadav RC. MYB transcription factor genes as regulators for plant responses: an overview. Physiol Mol Biol Plants. 2013;19(3):307–21. doi: 10.1007/s12298-013-0179-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Cheng H, Song S, Xiao LX, Soo HM, cheng Z, Xie D, et al. Gibberellin acts through jasmonate to control the expression of MYB21, MYB24, and MYB57 to promote stamen filament growth in Arabidopsis. Plos Genet. 2009;5 doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000440 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Archibald JM. The puzzle of plastid evolution. Curr Biol. 2009;19(2):R81–R8. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.11.067 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Geitler L. Der Formwechsel der pennaten Diatomeen. Arch Protistenk. 1932;78(1):1–226. [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Mann DG. Why didn't Lund see sex in Asterionella? A discussion of the diatom life cycle in nature In: Round FE, editor. Algae and the Aquatic Environment, contributions in honour of JWG Lund. Bristol: Biopress; 1988. p. 384–412. [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Tillmann U. Interactions between planktonic microalgae and protozoan grazers. J Euk Microbiol. 2004;51:156–68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Sterner RW, Elser JJ. Ecological stoichiometry: the biology of elements from molecules to the biosphere Princeton, New Jersey, USA: Princeton University Press; 2002. [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Chen G, Rynearson TA. Genetically distinct populations of a diatom co-exist during the North Atlantic spring bloom. Limnol Oceanogr. 2016;61(6):2165–79. doi: 10.1002/lno.10361 [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Guillard RRL. Culture of phytoplankton for feeding marine invertebrates In: Smith WL, Chanley MH, editors. Culture of Marine Invertebrate Animals. New York: Plenum Press; 1975. p. 26–60. [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Dyhrman ST, Jenkins BD, Rynearson TA, Saito MA, Mercier ML, Alexander H, et al. The transcriptome and proteome of the diatom Thalassiosira pseudonana reveal a diverse phosphorus stress response. PLOS One. 2012;7(3):e33768 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033768 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Pertea M, Kim D, Pertea GM, Leek JT, Salzberg SL. Transcript-level expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with HISAT, StringTie and Ballgown. Nat Prot. 2016;11:1650–67. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2016.095 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Bushnell B. BBtools 2016.
  • 71.Kim D, Langmead B, Salzberg SL. HISAT: a fast spliced aligner with low memory requirements. Nat Methods. 2015;12:357–60. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3317 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Pertea M, Pertea GM, Antonescu CM, Chang TC, Mendell JT, Salzberg SL. StringTie enables improved reconstruction of a transcriptome from RNA-seq reads. Nat Biotech. 2015;33(290–295):290–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Frazee AC, Pertea GM, Jaffe AE, Langmead B, Salzberg SL, Leek JT. Ballgown bridges the gap between transcriptome assembly and expression analysis. Nat Biotech. 2015;33(3):243–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Edgar RC. MUSCLE: a multiple sequence alignment method with reduced time and space complexity. BMC Bioinformatics. 2004;19(5):113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Stamatakis A. RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics. 2006;22:2688–90. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl446 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Chevenet F, Brun C, Bañuls AL, Jacq B, Christen R. TreeDyn: towards dynamic graphics and annotations for analyses of trees. BMC Bioinformatics. 2006;7:439 doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-7-439 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Dereeper A, Guignon V, Blanc G, Audic S, Buffet S, Chevenet F, et al. Phylogeny.fr: robust phylogenetic analysis for the non-specialist. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;1(36):W465–W9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

S1 Fig

Ammonium induces sexual morphologies in T. weissflogii (A) and C. cryptica (B). Proportion of sexual cells (oogonia and auxospores) relative to the total population in cultures supplemented with NH4Cl or NaNO3. An average of 120 and 107 cells were counted per replicate of T. weissflogii and C. cryptica, respectively, throughout the growth curve, but oogonia and auxospores were only observed beginning in stationary phase; independent cultures n = 3, data are mean values, error bars are s.d.. Inset: corresponding growth curve linking the onset of stationary phase with first appearance of sexual cells on day 10 (A) and 17 (B).

(TIF)

S2 Fig

The different life stages in T. pseudonana (A-L), T. weissflogii (M,N) and C. cryptica (O,P). A: SEM of vegetative cells (CCMP1335). B-D: SEM (B) and CFM images of CCMP1335 oogonia, displaying separation of the thecae and expansion of the membrane. E: CFM image of flagellated spermatocytes with stained DNA (arrowheads), F, G. Epifluorescence (F) and LM images of the same view. In F, an active, flagellated spermatocyte (arrowhead) possibly associated with an auxospore surface is revealed by lateral light from fluorescence of DNA (blue) and chlorophyll (red). H,L: Auxospores of CCMP1015 and CCMP1335 respectively (CFM). I,J: Individual spermatocytes attached to oogonia (SEM). K: Initial cells of T. pseudonana CCMP1335 (LM). M,N: T. weissflogii vegetative cells (M; LM) and auxospore (N; LM). O,P: C. cryptica oogonia (O; LM) and auxospores (P; LM). CFM images (C-E, H, L) show fluorescence of DNA in red and chlorophyll in green.

(TIF)

S3 Fig

Coulter Counter distributions of cell diameter for T. weissflogii (A) and C. cryptica (B) cultures in exponential phases of growth and maintained in NaNO3 (red) and after two successive 25% transfers to media with ammonium (blue), Each new culture was allowed to remain in stationary phase for three days before the next 25% transfer was made. Single replicates. Dashed lines are the mode for each peak. Cell densities in (A) are 2.2 x 105 ml-1 (NaNO3) and 3.3 x 105 ml-1 (ammonium) and (B) are 1.6 x 106 ml-1 (NaNO3) and 2.2 x 106 ml-1 (ammonium).

(TIF)

S4 Fig. T. pseudonana CCMP1335 growth and collection for RNAseq analysis.

Three independent cultures of each nitrogen treatment were harvested 3, 5, and 8 days after inoculation (down arrows) in exponential (EXP), stationary (STA) and late stationary phases (L-STA). The 100uM NH4+ STA treatment did not yield sufficient RNA for analysis.

(TIF)

S5 Fig. Interaction analysis workflow of RNAseq data.

Growth phase A vs. B is EXP vs. STA, EXP vs. L-STA, or STA vs. L-STA, respectively. Δexp is the magnitude of change in gene expression between growth phases for the different nitrogen treatments.

(TIF)

S6 Fig. Expression values (FPKM) of 15 selected genes across the three growth phases for each nitrogen treatment.

(TIF)

S1 Table. Pairwise comparisons, interaction analyses, genes with annotated functions, homologues to yeast meiotic genes, and genes of red algal origin.

A-K: Genes that were significantly differentially expressed in multiple pairwise comparisons of growth phases and nitrogen sources. L-O: Genes with significantly greater or lesser magnitude changes in expression between growth stages in the presence of ammonium relative to 100 μM NaNO3 identified via statistical interactions of pairwise condition comparisons. P: Genes that were identified as differentially expressed in conditions that triggered cell differentiation and sexual reproduction and have annotated functions. Q: Genes that were identified as differentially expressed in conditions that triggered cell differentiation and sexual reproduction and are homologous to yeast genes involved in meiosis. R: Genes that were identified as differentially expressed in conditions that triggered cell differentiation and sexual reproduction and are of red algal origin.

(XLSX)

Data Availability Statement

All RNAseq data have been deposited to the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) under BioProject ID PRJNA391000.


Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES