Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2017 Jul 7;7:4878. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-04966-1

Seed Pelleting with Calcium Peroxide Improves Crop Establishment of Direct-seeded Rice under Waterlogging Conditions

Junhao Mei 1, Weiqin Wang 1, Shaobing Peng 1, Lixiao Nie 1,2,
PMCID: PMC5501844  PMID: 28687785

Abstract

Poor crop establishment of direct-seeded rice (DSR) is one of the major constraints to wide adoption of DSR, particularly in areas prone to flooding after sowing or where fields are not level. Seed pelleting is an effective, practical and facile technique to enhance crop establishment under unfavorable environmental conditions. To evaluate the effects of seed pelleting on rice germination, seedling growth and associated metabolic events under waterlogging stress, various seed pelleting treatments including formulae, pelleting times (the weight ratio of pelleting agents: rice seeds = 1:1~7:1 (w/w) and CaO2 contents were tested in series of experiments. Naked seeds were maintained for comparison as a control. Pelleting treatments with CaO2 significantly increased seed germination and seedling growth of DSR under waterlogging conditions compared with pelleted seeds without CaO2 and naked seeds. The optimum weight ratios of CaO2 to dry seeds were found to be in the range of 0.6:1–1:1 based on seed germination and seedling growth performance under waterlogging conditions. Under waterlogging conditions, high seed germination percentage and vigorous seedling growth of DSR due to seed pelleting with CaO2 was associated with an increase in α-amylase activity, but decrease in alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) and pyruvate decarboxylase (PDC) activities in pelleted seeds.

Introduction

Rice (Oryza sativa L.), a staple food for more than half of the world’s population, is grown on 163.2 million hectares, with an average annual production of 740.9 million tones across the globe1. China is the main producer of rice, contributing more than 29% of total global rice production2. Therefore, the stability of China’s rice production is an indispensable part of the global food security3. In China, traditional transplanted flooded rice is the major planting pattern of rice and nearly 50% of the rice is grown under such conditions4. However, in recent years, depleting water resources, labor shortage and increasing labor cost have threatened the sustainability and productivity of transplanted flooded rice systems, suggesting that traditionally transplanted rice is no longer suitable for sustainable development in China5, 6.

Taking the advantages of saving water and labor and increasing system productivity, DSR has been believed to be an optimal option for rice production7. Tao et al. reported that direct-seeded rice was a feasible and sustainable alternative to transplanted rice in Central China based on comparable or even higher yield performances and greater water use efficiency, as well as lower global warming potential and conducive to mechanization8.Many countries have shifted from traditional transplanted flooded rice to DSR9, 10. At present, 23% of rice is direct-seeded globally11. In China, the planting area for direct-seeded rice is increasing rapidly. By 2012, the percentage of direct-seeded rice area to total rice planting area in China increased to 28%4.

Nevertheless, poor crop establishment remains a major obstacle for large-scale adoption of DSR, particularly in areas prone to flooding after sowing or where fields are not level1214. Globally, the flood-prone ecosystem accounts for about 9% of total rice lands, but for many countries in South and Southeast Asia, flood-prone rice can represent more than 25% of total rice lands, and the submergence duration varies from 1 to 10 days15. In China, 1/10 of the land areas, 33 million ha of farmland, 70% of the agricultural production are threatened by flood stress16. The waterlogging after rice seeding would result in seed floating, or the low seed germination rates, as well as uneven and irregular emergence of rice17. Furthermore, prolonged duration of flooding would result in wilting and death of the seeds and seedlings, inadequate crop stands, and eventually the reduction of grain yield18, 19.

In recent years, various strategies have been employed to improve abiotic stress tolerance during seed germination. Seed pelleting is an effective, practical and facile technique to enhance rapid and uniform emergence, high seedling vigor, and better yields in many field crops particularly under unfavorable environmental conditions20. Pelleting is one type of seed coating technology that is defined as the deposition of a layer of inert materials that may obscure the original shape and size of the seed, resulting in the shape and the general size of the raw seed changed, and a substantial weight increase and improved plantability21, 22. Ryu et al. reported that seed germination and root colonization of sesame were significantly improved when the sesame seeds were pelleted with a combination of clay, vermiculite and talc; consequently the grain yield was increased by 10.2%23. Previous research demonstrated that seed pelleting with ammonium molybdate and ferrous sulfate in rhizobium inoculated seeds improved growth parameters of soybean and yield24. Asagi et al. indicated that pelletized rice seeds with clay or diatomaceous clay increased germination percentage by 43% and 26%, respectively, compared with naked seeds25. Guan et al. pelleted tobacco seeds using the combined materials with a superabsorbent polymer, poly hydrogel, and salicylic acid enhanced drought-tolerance and significantly improved seed germination, as well as seedling growth26. Other studies found that seeds pelleting with calcium peroxide (CaO2) promoted germination of rice directly sown into flooded soil, and improved plant growth2730. However, little work has been done regarding the comparative performance of different seed pelleting formulae in enhancing the submergence tolerance of rice and to explore the mechanisms of pelleting-induced stress tolerance. The objectives of the present study were (1) to examine the effects of various seed pelleting formulae with various pelleting times (the weight ratio of pelleting agents: rice seeds = 1:1~7:1 (w/w)) on seed emergence performance under waterlogging conditions during seed germination and (2) to unravel the physiological and biochemical changes in rice seedlings under the influence of seed pelleting and waterlogging stress to obtain a better understanding of pelleting-induced mechanisms.

Results

Experiment 1: Rice seed germination and seedling growth between pelleted and naked rice seeds under waterlogging conditions

Seed germination

There were significant (p ≤ 0.05) variations in rice seed germination percentages among different seed pelleting treatments under waterlogging conditions (Fig. 1). The seed germination percentages were significantly higher in the pelleting treatments with 10% of CaO2 than those pelleting treatments without CaO2 and naked seeds under waterlogging conditions. Furthermore, the seed germination percentage was increased as the pelleting times increased (Fig. 1). Nevertheless, seed pelleting without CaO2 was not effective in rice seed emergence under waterlogging conditions. At 8 DAS, the maximum seed germination percentages were above 80% in all formulae, when pelleted with 10% of CaO2 at a pelleting time of 7 under waterlogging conditions. While the seed germination percentage of naked seeds was only 31.1%.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Germination dynamics of pelleted seeds in different formulae with various pelleting times and CaO2 contents under waterlogging conditions (1.5 cm water layer) in Experiment 1. (a) Formula 1. (b) Formula 2. (c) Formula 3. (d) Formula 4. CK: naked seeds. CP: Calcium peroxide. CP1: Seeds were pelleted by pelleting agents with 10% of CaO2 at a pelleting time of 1. CP3: Seeds were pelleted by pelleting agents with 10% of CaO2 at a pelleting time of 3. CP5: Seeds were pelleted by pelleting agents with 10% of CaO2 at a pelleting time of 5. CP7: Seeds were pelleted by pelleting agents with 10% of CaO2 at a pelleting time of 7. NCP1: Seeds were pelleted by pelleting agents without 10% of CaO2 at a pelleting time of 1. NCP3: Seeds were pelleted by pelleting agents without 10% of CaO2 at a pelleting time of 3. NCP5: Seeds were pelleted by pelleting agents without 10% of CaO2 at a pelleting time of 5. NCP7: Seeds were pelleted by pelleting agents without 10% of CaO2 at a pelleting time of 7. Seed germination data were recorded from 3 DAS until constant at 8 DAS. Error bars indicate standard error (n = 3).

Seedling growth

Pelleting treatments with CaO2 significantly enhanced rice seedling growth under waterlogging conditions compared with pelleted seeds without CaO2and naked seeds. Moreover, seedling growth parameters were increased as the pelleting times increased (Table 2). The highest plant growth parameters were observed in pelleting treatments with 10% of CaO2 at a pelleting time of 7 (Table 2). On average, seed pelleting with CaO2 treatments significantly increased the shoot length, root length, shoot fresh weight, and root fresh weight by 92.99%, 33.49%, 119.39%, and 87.93%, respectively, compared with naked seeds control. While seed pelleting treatments without CaO2 did not consistently increase seedling growth parameters compared to the naked seed control. No significant differences in seedling growth parameters were observed among different formulae, as well as pelleting treatments without CaO2 and naked seed control.

Table 2.

The effect of different seed pelleting formulae with various pelleting times on seedling growth parameters of direct-seeded rice under waterlogging conditions (1.5 cm water layer) at 8 DAS in Experiment 1.

Treatment CaO2 content Pelleting time Shoot length Root length Shoot FW Root FW
(cm) (cm) (mg seedling−1) (mg seedling−1)
Naked seed 0 4.89 ± 0.10 efg 6.50 ± 0.31 bc 14.67 ± 0.59 d 8.08 ± 0.92 e
Pelleting Formula 1 0 1:1 4.28 ± 0.35 g 6.36 ± 0.23 c 13.64 ± 0.97 d 9.68 ± 0.85 de
0 3:1 4.64 ± 0.30 fg 6.03 ± 0.96 c 14.10 ± 0.89 d 7.72 ± 0.68 e
0 5:1 5.37 ± 0.16 e 6.43 ± 0.39 c 15.02 ± 0.64 d 8.67 ± 0.79 e
0 7:1 5.22 ± 0.29 ef 6.40 ± 0.58 c 16.33 ± 1.10 d 8.93 ± 0.62 e
10% 1:1 8.14 ± 0.19 d 7.16 ± 0.95 bc 29.80 ± 0.68 c 11.64 ± 1.16 cd
10% 3:1 9.23 ± 0.30 c 8.13 ± 0.49 ab 29.96 ± 1.11 c 13.26 ± 0.30 bc
10% 5:1 10.42 ± 0.20 b 9.42 ± 0.29 a 35.21 ± 0.94 b 15.12 ± 0.75 b
10% 7:1 11.69 ± 0.32 a 9.42 ± 0.13 a 41.73 ± 2.15 a 19.07 ± 1.11 a
Naked seed 0 4.89 ± 0.10 d 6.50 ± 0.31 de 14.67 ± 0.59 d 8.08 ± 0.92 c
Pelleting Formula 2 0 1:1 4.53 ± 0.35 d 6.16 ± 0.30 ef 13.60 ± 1.47 d 8.24 ± 1.15 c
0 3:1 5.12 ± 0.19 d 5.48 ± 0.18 f 13.84 ± 0.75 d 6.88 ± 0.80 c
0 5:1 5.00 ± 0.12 d 5.90 ± 0.25 ef 14.03 ± 0.44 d 8.30 ± 0.42 c
0 7:1 6.42 ± 0.25 c 6.55 ± 0.55 de 21.05 ± 0.80 c 12.60 ± 0.80 b
10% 1:1 7.23 ± 0.42 c 7.15 ± 0.45 d 26.88 ± 0.68 b 13.60 ± 0.61 b
10% 3:1 8.89 ± 0.42 b 8.13 ± 0.42 c 27.59 ± 2.29 b 13.71 ± 0.84 b
10% 5:1 10.25 ± 0.20 a 10.10 ± 0.23 a 34.67 ± 1.76 a 17.12 ± 1.29 a
10% 7:1 11.26 ± 0.67 a 9.17 ± 0.11 b 38.49 ± 3.27 a 18.76 ± 1.30 a
Naked seed 0 4.89 ± 0.10 de 6.50 ± 0.31 b 14.67 ± 0.59 e 8.08 ± 0.92 de
Pelleting Formula 3 0 1:1 4.85 ± 0.21 de 5.56 ± 0.30 b 13.59 ± 1.30 e 8.06 ± 0.23 de
0 3:1 4.60 ± 0.26 e 5.66 ± 0.50 b 13.49 ± 1.66 e 6.56 ± 0.59 e
0 5:1 4.92 ± 0.24 de 6.44 ± 0.47 b 15.04 ± 1.54 de 8.63 ± 1.44 cde
0 7:1 5.76 ± 0.42 d 6.22 ± 0.75 b 19.03 ± 1.35 d 10.87 ± 1.09 cd
10% 1:1 7.61 ± 0.48 c 6.64 ± 0.41 b 26.18 ± 2.92 c 11.96 ± 2.14 bc
10% 3:1 8.47 ± 0.34 c 9.22 ± 0.25 a 27.60 ± 1.08 c 15.73 ± 0.54 a
10% 5:1 9.95 ± 0.56 b 9.72 ± 0.61 a 33.11 ± 0.59 b 15.22 ± 1.29 ab
10% 7:1 11.52 ± 0.27 a 9.96 ± 0.27 a 40.32 ± 1.71 a 18.44 ± 2.04 a
Naked seed 0 4.89 ± 0.10 e 6.50 ± 0.31 bc 14.67 ± 0.59 c 8.08 ± 0.92 c
Pelleting Formula 4 0 1:1 4.85 ± 0.19 e 5.47 ± 0.27 c 13.91 ± 1.69 c 6.91 ± 0.16 c
0 3:1 4.66 ± 0.20 e 5.38 ± 0.31 c 13.47 ± 0.70 c 6.95 ± 0.16 c
0 5:1 5.39 ± 0.36 de 6.59 ± 0.38 bc 15.60 ± 0.92 c 9.82 ± 0.61 bc
0 7:1 5.87 ± 0.03 d 7.57 ± 0.67 b 17.93 ± 2.67 c 11.79 ± 0.21 b
10% 1:1 6.98 ± 0.68 c 7.12 ± 0.61 b 23.25 ± 2.18 b 12.37 ± 1.79 b
10% 3:1 7.75 ± 0.35 c 7.64 ± 0.13 b 26.08 ± 1.87 b 12.77 ± 1.13 b
10% 5:1 10.42 ± 0.05 b 9.88 ± 0.69 a 36.02 ± 0.88 a 17.40 ± 1.27 a
10% 7:1 11.31 ± 0.33 a 9.97 ± 0.54 a 37.93 ± 1.72 a 16.89 ± 1.38 a
Formula ns ns ns ns
CaO2 content ** ** ** **
Pelleting time ** ** ** **
Formula × CaO2 content * ns ns ns
Formula × Pelleting time ns ns ns ns
CaO2 content × Pelleting time ** ** ** *
Formula × CaO2 content × Pelleting time ns ns ns ns

Pelleting time is the weight ratio of pelleting agents to rice seeds. Within a column under each pelleting formula, means followed by different letters are significantly different at a 0.05 probability level according to a least significant difference (LSD) test. The naked seeds control were not involved in three-way ANOVA. FW: fresh weight. ** and * denote significance at the 0.01 and 0.05 probability level, respectively. ns: non-significant.

Experiment 2: Effects of different CaO2 contents and pelleting times on seed germination and early seedling growth of pelleted rice under waterlogging conditions

Seed germination

All of the pelleting treatments with CaO2 significantly enhanced rice seed emergence of rice compared with pelleted without CaO2 and naked seed control (Fig. 2). When the weight ratio of pelleting agents to rice seed was 1:1, an increase in CaO2 content significantly increased the germination percentage under waterlogging conditions. The maximum germination rates at 8 DAS were 87.8% and 84.4% in formulae 1 and 2, respectively, when the CaO2 content in the pelleting agents was increased to 60%. When the pelleting times were 3:1 or 5:1, the highest seed germination percentages were observed at a CaO2 content of 20%. When the pelleting time was increased to 7:1, the germination percentages of pelleted seeds decreased with the increase in content of CaO2, and the highest germination rates at 8 DAS were 86.7% and 83.3%, respectively, at 10% CaO2content in formulae 1 and 2.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Germination dynamics of pelleted seeds in two formulae with various pelleting times and CaO2 contents under waterlogging conditions (1.5 cm water layer) in Experiment 2. Seeds were pelleted in Formula 1 (a (pelleting time of 1), c (pelleting time of 3), e (pelleting time of 5), g (pelleting time of 7)) and Formula 2 (b (pelleting time of 1), d (pelleting time of 3), f (pelleting time of 5), h (pelleting time of 7)). CK: naked seeds. F + 0% CaO2: Seeds were pelleted by pelleting agents without CaO2. F + 10% CaO2: Seeds were pelleted by pelleting agents with 10% of CaO2. F + 20% CaO2: Seeds were pelleted by pelleting agents with 20% of CaO2. F + 40% CaO2: Seeds were pelleted by pelleting agents with 40% of CaO2. F + 60% CaO2: Seeds were pelleted by pelleting agents with 60% of CaO2. Seed germination data were recorded from 3 DAS until constant at 8 DAS. Error bars indicate standard error (n = 3).

Seedling growth

All of the pelleting treatments with CaO2 significantly enhanced rice seedling growth compared with pelleted without CaO2 and naked seed control in both formulae 1 and 2 (Table 3). The highest seedling growth parameters were found at 60% of CaO2 content when the pelleting time was 1:1; at 20% of CaO2 content when the pelleting times was 3:1 or 5:1; at 10% of CaO2 content when the pelleting times was 7:1 in both formulae 1 and 2. The shoot length, root length and their fresh weights increased with the increase in CaO2 content, but these parameters were decreased when the weight ratio of CaO2 to rice seed was over 1:1. When the pelleting time was increased to 7:1, seedling growth parameters showed continuing downward trends as the content of CaO2 increased in formulae 1 and 2 under waterlogging conditions.

Table 3.

The effect of two seed pelleting formulae with various pelleting times and CaO2 contents on seedling growth parameters of direct-seeded rice under waterlogging conditions (1.5 cm water layer) at 8 DAS in Experiment 2.

Treatment Pelleting time CaO2 content Shoot length Root length Shoot FW Root FW
(cm) (cm) (mg seedling−1) (mg seedling−1)
Naked seed 0 1.92 ± 0.06 j 2.41 ± 0.37 g 6.21 ± 0.27 k 3.61 ± 1.31 gh
Pelleting Formula 1 1:1 0 2.25 ± 0.30 j 2.01 ± 0.91 gh 6.80 ± 0.66 k 3.79 ± 1.32 fgh
1:1 10% 4.21 ± 0.48 gh 6.17 ± 0.40 cd 14.15 ± 1.80 i 8.63 ± 2.17 de
1:1 20% 8.00 ± 0.64 c 8.38 ± 1.03 ab 27.22 ± 2.57 cd 17.02 ± 1.42 abc
1:1 40% 9.22 ± 0.80 b 8.88 ± 0.61 ab 28.39 ± 2.29 cd 18.66 ± 0.47 a
1:1 60% 10.54 ± 0.63 a 9.58 ± 0.80 a 33.84 ± 2.39 ab 18.36 ± 5.05 ab
3:1 0 2.47 ± 0.34 ij 3.65 ± 1.14 fg 8.64 ± 1.44 k 4.78 ± 1.40 fg
3:1 10% 7.83 ± 1.04 c 8.16 ± 1.46 ab 26.67 ± 2.98 cd 14.07 ± 1.68 c
3:1 20% 9.96 ± 0.71 ab 8.35 ± 0.77 ab 35.18 ± 0.71 a 19.55 ± 0.58 a
3:1 40% 6.59 ± 0.44 de 7.26 ± 0.97 bcd 25.22 ± 0.85 de 14.57 ± 0.90 c
3:1 60% 5.05 ± 0.22 fg 5.66 ± 0.80 de 22.29 ± 0.72 ef 10.24 ± 0.79 d
5:1 0 2.89 ± 0.22 ij 4.25 ± 1.42 ef 10.03 ± 1.24 jk 5.50 ± 2.49 efg
5:1 10% 7.75 ± 0.43 cd 7.56 ± 0.86 bc 29.95 ± 0.53 bc 15.32 ± 0.85 bc
5:1 20% 10.40 ± 0.18 a 8.23 ± 0.41 ab 34.77 ± 0.57 a 19.82 ± 2.18 a
5:1 40% 5.82 ± 0.06 ef 4.21 ± 0.87 ef 20.30 ± 0.89 fg 7.09 ± 0.89 def
5:1 60% 4.28 ± 0.24 gh 2.39 ± 0.81 g 16.30 ± 0.07 hi 4.81 ± 0.23 fg
7:1 0 2.59 ± 0.16 Ij 2.43 ± 1.82 g 8.34 ± 0.91 k 3.18 ± 1.74 gh
7:1 10% 10.25 ± 0.33 ab 9.34 ± 1.10 a 34.60 ± 2.47 a 18.72 ± 3.72 a
7:1 20% 7.90 ± 0.15 c 7.24 ± 0.69 bcd 26.90 ± 0.58 cd 14.93 ± 1.86 c
7:1 40% 5.03 ± 0.11 fg 3.19 ± 1.82 fg 18.10 ± 0.90 gh 5.87 ± 2.92 efg
7:1 60% 3.61 ± 0.19 hi 0.62 ± 0.36 h 13.84 ± 0.73 Ij 1.44 ± 0.75 h
Naked seed 0 1.92 ± 0.06 g 2.41 ± 0.37 gh 6.21 ± 0.27 k 3.61 ± 1.31 jk
Pelleting Formula 2 1:1 0 1.74 ± 0.19 g 1.29 ± 0.90 h 5.04 ± 1.02 k 2.01 ± 0.37 k
1:1 10% 5.12 ± 0.21 cd 5.19 ± 1.20 de 15.49 ± 1.18 i 9.93 ± 2.52 f
1:1 20% 7.11 ± 0.23 b 7.48 ± 1.15 bc 21.73 ± 1.02 f 14.62 ± 0.11 de
1:1 40% 9.43 ± 0.58 a 8.25 ± 1.09 abc 28.26 ± 1.85 cd 16.94 ± 2.44 cd
1:1 60% 10.02 ± 0.17 a 8.62 ± 0.60 ab 31.46 ± 0.79 ab 20.96 ± 2.30 ab
3:1 0 3.64 ± 0.78 ef 4.11 ± 1.54 ef 11.74 ± 1.56 j 5.56 ± 2.50 ijk
3:1 10% 5.69 ± 0.66 c 6.77 ± 1.94 cd 19.75 ± 1.31 fg 11.56 ± 3.96 ef
3:1 20% 9.60 ± 0.18 a 8.92 ± 0.43 ab 31.08 ± 0.49 bc 19.62 ± 1.31 abc
3:1 40% 7.12 ± 0.33 b 7.90 ± 0.09 abc 25.03 ± 0.92 d 15.22 ± 0.42 d
3:1 60% 5.31 ± 0.14 cd 4.93 ± 0.89 e 18.92 ± 0.84 fgh 9.59 ± 1.01 fg
5:1 0 3.03 ± 0.21 f 4.13 ± 0.82 ef 9.63 ± 0.62 j 5.89 ± 0.68 hij
5:1 10% 7.43 ± 0.51 b 8.42 ± 0.71 abc 26.09 ± 2.30 de 16.24 ± 4.63 cd
5:1 20% 10.28 ± 0.32 a 9.43 ± 0.44 a 33.13 ± 0.53 ab 22.91 ± 0.86 a
5:1 40% 5.32 ± 0.53 cd 4.63 ± 2.08 e 19.37 ± 0.87 fg 9.18 ± 3.22 fgh
5:1 60% 4.61 ± 0.26 de 2.63 ± 1.07 fg 17.01 ± 0.99 ghi 4.61 ± 2.14 jk
7:1 0 3.22 ± 0.21 f 4.34 ± 1.22 ef 11.46 ± 0.84 j 6.10 ± 0.81 g hij
7:1 10% 10.43 ± 0.15 a 9.12 ± 0.20 ab 34.33 ± 0.77 a 18.19 ± 1.91 bcd
7:1 20% 8.11 ± 0.45 b 8.22 ± 0.72 bc 27.82 ± 1.64 de 16.70 ± 1.32 cd
7:1 40% 5.66 ± 0.40 cd 4.05 ± 1.83 ef 21.75 ± 1.13 f 8.25 ± 1.52 fgIj
7:1 60% 3.76 ± 0.22 ef 1.10 ± 0.54 h 15.98 ± 0.36 hi 2.81 ± 1.13 jk
Formula ns ns ns ns
Pelleting time * ** ns **
CaO2 content ** ** ** **
Formula × Pelleting time ns ** ** ns
Formula × CaO2 content ns ns * ns
CaO2 content × Pelleting time ** ** ** **
Formula × CaO2 content × Pelleting time ns ns ns ns

Pelleting time is the weight ratio of pelleting agent to rice seeds. Within a column under each pelleting formula, means followed by different letters are significantly different at a 0.05 probability level according to a least significant difference (LSD) test. The naked seeds were not involved in three-way ANOVA. FW: fresh weight. ** and * denote significance at the 0.01 and 0.05 probability level, respectively. ns: non-significant.

The optimum weight ratio of CaO2 to dry seeds was determined based on the highest germination percentage and the best seedling growth, which was achieved under a certain CaO2 content at a certain pelleting time. In this study, the optimum weight ratio of CaO2 to dry seeds was at 0.6:1–1:1 (a CaO2 content × a pelleting time). Adverse effects on seed germination and seedling growth was observed when the ratio was over 1:1.

Experiment 3: The mechanisms underlying the waterlogging tolerance during seed germination and seedling growth induced by rice seed pelleting with CaO2

Seed germination and Seedling growth

Results revealed that seed pelleting treatments at a pelleting time of 3:1 with 20% of CaO2 significantly (p ≤ 0.05) enhanced seed germination and seedling growth compared with naked seeds under waterlogging conditions, while there were no significant differences in seed germination and seedling growth between pelleted seed treatments and the naked seed control under normal condition (Fig. 3 and Table 4). The germination percentages in the two pelleted treatments under waterlogging conditions and three treatments under normal conditions were above 86.9%, which was significantly higher than naked seeds (45.6%) under waterlogging conditions (Fig. 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Germination dynamics of pelleted rice seeds in two pelleting treatments under waterlogging (1.5 cm water layer) and normal conditions (without water layer) in Experiment 3. P0: non-pelleted naked seeds; P1: Seed pelleting time of three with CaO2 content of 20% in formula 1; P2: Seed pelleting time of three with CaO2 content of 20% in formula 2. The seed germination data were recorded from 3 DAS until constant at 8 DAS. Error bars indicate standard error (n = 4).

Table 4.

The effect of two seed pelleting treatments on seedling growth parameters of direct-seeded rice under waterlogging (1.5 cm water layer) and normal (without standing water) conditions at 8 DAS in Experiment 3.

Water condition Pelleted Treatment Shoot length Root length Shoot FW Root FW
(cm) (cm) (mg seedling−1) (mg seedling−1)
Waterlogging (Water depth1.5 cm) P0 1.99 ± 0.07 c 1.86 ± 0.14 d 4.79 ± 0.30 e 1.70 ± 0.08 c
P1 7.24 ± 0.13 b 9.73 ± 0.24 c 22.09 ± 0.78 d 18.92 ± 1.11 b
P2 7.09 ± 0.30 b 9.84 ± 0.36 c 21.04 ± 0.47 d 19.00 ± 1.67 b
Control (Without standing water) P0 7.99 ± 0.11 a 12.29 ± 0.04 b 24.35 ± 0.49 c 24.11 ± 0.65 a
P1 8.31 ± 0.09 a 13.11 ± 0.57 a 28.71 ± 0.98 a 25.72 ± 1.01 a
P2 8.13 ± 0.14 a 12.80 ± 0.27 ab 26.13 ± 0.49 b 23.76 ± 0.81 a

Within a column under each water condition, means followed by different letters are significantly different at a 0.05 probability level according to a least significant difference (LSD) test. P0: non-pelleted naked seeds; P1: Seed pelleting time of three with CaO2 content of 20% in formula 1; P2: Seed pelleting time of three with CaO2 content of 20% in formula 2. FW: fresh weight.

Amylase activity

Waterlogging reduced the α-amylase activity of rice seeds or seedlings compared with normal conditions (Fig. 4). Even under normal conditions, the two pelleting treatments slightly increased the α-amylase activity compared with the naked seed control. Under waterlogging conditions, both of the seed pelleting treatments at the pelleting time of 3:1 with 20% of CaO2 content significantly improved the starch metabolism of rice seeds or seedlings. In all treatments, α-amylase activities were progressively increased and achieved the highest values at 7 DAS.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Variations in α-amylase activity of pelleted rice seeds and seedlings in two pelleting treatments under waterlogging (1.5 cm water layer) and normal (without water layer) conditions at 0, 1, 3, 5, and 7 DAS in Experiment 3. P0: non-pelleted naked seeds; P1: Seed pelleting time of three with a CaO2 content of 20% in formula 1; P2: Seed pelleting time of three with a CaO2 content of 20% in formula 2. Seeds at 0 DAS were tested under a dry weight basis, while seedlings at 1, 3, 5 and 7 DAS were tested under a fresh weight basis. Error bars above the mean indicate standard error (n = 4).

ADH and PDC activities

ADH activities in rice seeds or seedlings were significantly higher under waterlogging conditions than under normal conditions (Fig. 5a). Under waterlogging conditions, both seed pelleting treatments significantly decreased the ADH activities in rice seeds or seedlings compared with the naked seeds. There were no variations in ADH activities between two seed pelleting treatments under waterlogging or normal conditions. However, seed pelleting treatments didn’t affect the ADH activities in rice seeds or seedlings consistently. The ADH activities in naked seeds under waterlogging conditions continuously increased as seed germination progressed. While in the other five treatments, the ADH activities were progressively decreased as seed germination progressed. Under waterlogging conditions, both seed pelleting treatments significantly decreased the PDC activities in rice seeds or seedlings compared with the naked seeds (Fig. 5b). There were no variations in PDC activities between two seed pelleting treatments under waterlogging or normal conditions.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Variations in alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) (a) and pyruvate decarboxylase (PDC) (b) activities of pelleted rice seeds and seedlings in two pelleting treatments under waterlogging (1.5 cm water layer) and normal (without water layer) conditions at 0, 1, 3, 5, and 7 DAS in Experiment 3. P0: non-pelleted naked seeds; P1: Seed pelleting time of three with a CaO2 content of 20% in formula 1; P2: Seed pelleting time of three with a CaO2 content of 20% in formula 2. Seeds at 0 DAS were tested under a dry weight basis, while seedlings at 1, 3, 5 and 7 DAS were tested under a fresh weight basis. Error bars above the mean indicate standard error (n = 4).

Field experiment: Performance of pelleting treatments on seed germination and early seedling growth of pelleted rice under waterlogging conditions in field

Seed germination and Seedling growth

Seed pelleting treatments at a pelleting time of 3:1 with 20% of CaO2 significantly (p ≤ 0.05) enhanced seed germination and early seedling growth compared with naked seeds under waterlogged field conditions, while there were no significant differences between the two seed pelleting treatments (Fig. 6 and Table 5). These were consistent with the results from the growth chamber experiments. On average, the germination percentages of the two pelleting treatments were 33.75% higher than the naked seeds. The shoot length, root length, shoot fresh weight, and root fresh weight in the pelleting treatments were increased by 65.06%, 33.86%, 172.61%, and 182.53%, respectively, compared with naked seeds control.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Germination dynamics of pelleted rice seeds in two pelleting treatments under waterlogging conditions in Field. P0: non-pelleted naked seeds; P1: Seed pelleting time of three with CaO2 content of 20% in formula 1; P2: Seed pelleting time of three with CaO2 content of 20% in formula 2. The seed germination data were recorded from 3 DAS until constant at 8 DAS. Error bars indicate standard error (n = 4).

Table 5.

The effect of two seed pelleting treatments on seedling growth parameters of direct-seeded rice under waterlogging conditions at 9 DAS in Field Experiment.

Treatment Shoot length Root length Shoot FW Root FW
(cm) (cm) (mg seedling−1) (mg seedling−1)
P0 7.37 ± 0.10 b 5.70 ± 0.27 b 7.76 ± 0.29 b 3.55 ± 0.19 b
P1 12.18 ± 0.37 a 7.49 ± 0.19 a 21.16 ± 0.66 a 10.56 ± 0.69 a
P2 12.15 ± 0.19 a 7.77 ± 0.26 a 21.15 ± 1.29 a 9.50 ± 0.37 a

Within a column under each water condition, means followed by different letters are significantly different at a 0.05 probability level according to a least significant difference (LSD) test. P0: non-pelleted naked seeds; P1: Seed pelleting time of three with CaO2 content of 20% in formula 1; P2: Seed pelleting time of three with CaO2 content of 20% in formula 2. FW: fresh weight.

Discussion

Waterlogging seriously impeded seed germination and early seedling growth of DSR, pelleting treatments with calcium peroxide significantly increased seed germination and improved seedling growth. Ellis and Setter reported that the presence of O2 in the floodwater was critical for the survival of seedlings under waterlogging conditions31. Miro and Ismail reported that rice seeds failed to develop roots and leaves even though they can germinate in submerged conditions32. Under waterlogging conditions, the elongations of the coleoptile and mesocotyl were stimulated, which facilitated the exposure to air33, 34. However, the fast elongation of the coleoptile and mesocotyl consumes much energy. Sometimes, waterlogging results in plant death if energy reserves are depleted before emergence35. In this study, coleoptiles of the pelleted rice seeds with optimal CaO2 content first expanded in a thin layer, and later, the coleoptile formed a sturdy morphology and rapid expansion of leaf after contact with air, while the naked seeds seldom germinated.

Baker and Hatton reported that the available oxygen increased as the content of CaO2 increased36. In this study, increased content of CaO2 in the pelleting agents significantly increased the oxygen release to flooding water. In Experiment 2, an increase in the content of CaO2 from 10% to 60% at a pelleting time of 3:1, resulted in an increase in the amount of oxygen released from CaO2 by 106% (data not shown). Previous reports suggested that elevated oxygen tension may be highly toxic to embryos, root development and root elongation37. The chemical reactions of CaO2 and water, which usually occur as 2 CaO2 + 2 H2O → 2 Ca(OH)2 + O2, produce large amounts of calcium hydroxide and could form an alkaline environment for seeds when pelleted with excessive CaO2. In this study, CaO2 was added in the pelleting agents increased available oxygen for seed respiration during germination, relieved the anoxia or hypoxia caused by waterlogging conditions. In addition, CaO2 may inhibit the proliferation of anaerobic microorganisms, which negatively affect the seed germination. A similar research reported that the germination of seeds coated with streptomycin or a mixture of streptomycin and CaO2 was significantly reduced as compared with that of seeds coated with only CaO2, which implied that limitation of bacterial pathogens with CaO2 might not be as important as O2 supply in crop establishment under waterlogging conditions38. However, we could not exclude the sterilization effect from CaO2 during seed germination in this study. The importance of the antimicrobial effect from CaO2 will be evaluated in the future research.

During rice seed germination, oxygen plays an important role on decomposition of reserves in endosperm. While oxygen is limited under waterlogging conditions. CaO2 produce large amounts of oxygen in water. Under aerobic conditions, α-amylase activity in rice seedlings was maintained at higher level because of higher expression of Amy1A gene compared with that in flooded soils39. The α-amylase in rice is likely playing a crucial role for the successful degradation of starch into carbohydrates in the anoxic rice endosperm. Perata et al. and Guglielminetti et al. indicated that α-amylase activity of the anaerobically germinated rice seeds was markedly lower than that presented in aerobic conditions40, 41. Moreover, Saddam et al. proclaimed that submergence stress severely reduced α-amylase activity by limiting starch degradation, therefore, rice seed reserves were not well metabolized under submerged conditions42. The above findings were consistent with our results that extremely low α-amylase activities were observed for naked rice seeds or seedlings under waterlogging conditions. Pronounced increases in α-amylase activities were recorded in seed pelleting treatments with CaO2 under waterlogging conditions.

One of the best characterised plant responses to waterlogging is the metabolic switch from aerobic respiration to anaerobic fermentation. Under submerged conditions, glycolysis and alcoholic fermentation are important processes for the energy production of seeds or seedlings31, 42. The two key enzymes involved in glycolysis and alcoholic fermentation are ADH and PDC4345. Magneschi and Perata noted that the inhibited aerobic respiration under submergence conditions resulted in reduced energy production and supply of intermediates needed for seed germination and seedling growth46. Several reports had revealed the importance of increases in ADH and PDC activities in acceleration of plant growth and survival under anoxia4750. Tolerance to waterlogging stress during seed germination was expressed as rapid germination, coleoptile elongation, anaerobic respiration to sustain energy supply, and maintenance of the cellular extensibility of the growing embryo14, 34. Energy supply is indeed a key factor for rice tolerance to oxygen deficiency. Plants tolerant of anaerobiosis maintain an active fermentative metabolism for a relatively long time46, that accelerates carbohydrate consumption that can be expected to increase the energy production51, with a 2-3-fold increase in glycolytic flux under anoxia with respect to the aerobic control50. Under aerobic conditions, activities of fermentative enzymes, ADH and PDC were decreased to 1/10-1/5 compared to that under anaerobic conditions52. In this study, seed pelleting treatments with CaO2 decreased the ADH and PDC activities in rice seeds or seedlings compared with the naked seeds under waterlogging conditions. This was because CaO2 increased the solubility of O2 in water under waterlogging conditions, which may transfer to aerobic respiration in rice seeds or seedlings, thus providing enough energy for the survival or growth of rice seeds or seedlings under submergence conditions.

Conclusively, seed pelleting with CaO2 can alleviate the negative effects of flooding stress on rice seed emergence and seedling establishment. High seed germination percentage and vigorous seedling growth due to seed pelleting was associated with an increase in α-amylase activity, but decreases in ADH and PDC activities in pelleted seeds. Seed pelleting with CaO2 could be used as a strategy to improve the crop establishment of direct-seeded rice, when seeds suffered from waterlogging soon after seed sowing. However, more exact mechanisms underlying the waterlogging tolerance induced by seed pelleting with CaO2 will be addressed in the future. And the effects of seed pelleting treatments need to be wide demonstrated and popularized in practical production.

Materials and Methods

Seed source

Seed of a widely grown Indica rice cultivar viz., Huanghuazhan (HHZ, inbred) were obtained from the Crop Physiology and Production Center, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China. The initial germination rate of the seeds was >93%. Healthy and filled seeds selected from the same seed lot were used for all of the experiments. Prior to experimentation, seeds were stored in a refrigerator (−4 °C).

Seed pelleting treatments

Based on previous research, four seed pelleting formulae were adopted for present studies (Table 1). In general, the pelleting formula consists of pelleting agents, including clay, talc, attapulgite and bentonite (all were produced by Shijiazhuang Keying Refractory Material Co., LTD, China) and the adhesive (solution of 1.5% (w/w) polyvinyl alcohol, produced by Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., LTD, China). The rice seeds were pelleted with a minitype seed coater (produced by Shanghai Huanghai Drug Testing Instrument Distribution CO., LTD, China) using the following procedures: Firstly, the seeds were quickly soaked in the tap water then air-dried without visible moisture on the surface of seeds. Secondly, 1/4 of the total pelleting agents were slowly placed into the rotate pan of the seed coater (200 mm diameter) at the rotating speed of 45 rpm. Then, the pre-treated seeds were placed into the pan, after then, 1/4 of the total adhesive was sprayed onto the seed surface for 2 min while rolling. Thirdly, another 1/4 of the total pelleting agents were added into the rotate pan with 1/4 of the total adhesive sprayed onto the seed surface, this step was repeated twice. Finally, after all of the pelleting agents and adhesive were added, the pan was continuously rotated for 5 min. The pelleted seeds were then air-dried for 2 days at room temperature. Naked seeds were used as a control.

Table 1.

Formulae of rice seed-pelleting agents used in the experiments.

Formula Clay (g) Talc (g) Attapulgite (g) Bentonite (g) Total weight (g)
1 66.7 33.3 100
2 71.4 28.6 100
3 50 50 100
4 30 60 10 100

In experiment 1, Formulae 1–4 were adopted. In experiment 2, Formulae 1 and 2 were adopted. In experiment 3, Formulae 1 and 2 were adopted. In field experiment, Formulae 1 and 2 were adopted.

In Experiment 1, four pelleting formulae were used (Table 1). To evaluate the effectiveness of CaO2 on seed germination and seedling growth under waterlogging conditions, two treatments were set in each formula, with 10% (w/w) CaO2 (with a purity of 70%) and without CaO2, and each treatment included various pelleting times (1, 3, 5 or 7). Because the germination and seedling growth performance of pelleted seeds with CaO2 was better compared to naked seeds as well as pelleted seeds without CaO2, in Experiment 2, formula 1 (best performance) and 2 (previously reported) were selected. In order to examine the effectiveness of different contents of CaO2 on seed germination and seedling growth, based on the proportions of ingredients unvaried, the CaO2 content were set as 0%, 10%, 20%, 40% and 60% (w/w) in each pelleting formula with various pelleting times (1, 3, 5 and 7). In Experiment 3, the pelleting formulae were the same as that in Experiment 2, however, only 20% (w/w) of CaO2 content at a pelleting time of three was adopted in Experiment 3.

Experimentation

Growth chamber experiments were carried out in the Crop Physiology and Production Center, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China during October 2015 to July 2016. Plastic trays 31.0 cm × 20.0 cm × 12.0 m in size were filled with 7.50 kg of puddled soil which was collected from the field and then soil surface was leveled in trays. In each tray, 30 rice seeds for each treatment were equally sown on the soil surface in experiment 1 and 2 with three replications. In experiment 3, four replications with four trays with 1.5 cm water depth and the other four replications without standing water were used to sample for determinations of α–amylase, alcohol dehydrogenase and pyruvate decarboxylase activity. The experiments were laid out in a completely randomized design. All of the trays were placed in a growth chamber with a 12 h light period and a constant temperature of 25 °C. The humidity during the course of the study was maintained at 60% in the growth chamber. Water was applied to all trays when their moisture content declined. Germination of seeds was recorded on a daily basis according to AOSA until a constant count was achieved53. Seeds were considered to be germinated when the hypocotyl length exceeded 2 mm. Seed germination percentage was taken as the ratio of the number of seeds germinated to the total number of seeds sown and was expressed as a percentage. At 8 DAS, 6 seedlings were randomly sampled from each treatment to record their shoot and root lengths. The seedlings were dissected into roots and shoots and their fresh weights were recorded immediately. For determination of α-amylase activity, 1.0 g of dry seeds (0 DAS) and seedlings sampled at 1, 3, 5 and 7 DAS including shoot and root were ground and mixed with 100 ml distilled water, and left for 24 h at 4 °C and then the mixture was filtered with filter paper (Whatman No. 42). The enzyme activity was determined by the dinitro-salicylic acid (DNS) method54. To determine alcohol dehydrogenase activity and pyruvate decarboxylase activity, 0.1 g dry seeds (0 DAS) and seedlings sampled at1, 3, 5 and 7 DAS were ground and detected by an alcohol dehydrogenase assay kit and a pyruvate decarboxylase test kit (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute).

The field experiments were conducted at the Zhangbang Village, Dajin Town, Wuxue County, Hubei Province, China, in May 2016. In case of seed floating or stress from waterlogging conditions when heavy rains occurred soon after direct sowing, 20% (w/w) of CaO2 content at a pelleting time of three in formulae 1 and 2, which were consistent with that in Experiment 3. The treatments were randomly arranged using a randomized block design with four replicates. The plot area was 5 m2. The water layer in each plot was kept 2–3 cm until the seed germination was stable. The germination of seeds was recorded on daily basis according to AOSA (1990) until a constant count was achieved. Germination percentage was taken as the ratio of the number of seeds germinated to the total number of seeds sown and is expressed as a percentage. At 9 DAS, 10 seedlings were randomly sampled from each plot to record their shoot and root length. The seedlings from each plot were then dissected into roots and shoots, and their fresh weight was recorded immediately.

Statistical Analysis

Data were analyzed to confirm variability following analysis of variance using Statistix 9.0. In the experiment 1 & field experiment, we used one-way ANOVA, pelleting treatments as grouping factors, germination, root length, shoot length, root fresh weight, shoot fresh weight as response variables. In the experiments 2 & 3, we used three-way ANOVAs, with formulae, CaO2 contents and pelleting times as grouping factors, germination, root length, shoot length, root fresh weight, shoot fresh weight as response variables. But the naked seeds were not involved in three-way ANOVAs. The differences between treatments were separated using a Least Significance Difference (LSD) test at a 0.05 probability level.

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project No. 31371571), the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 Program) (Project No. 2014AA10A605), and Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest of China (Project No. 201203096).

Author Contributions

J.M. and L.N. initiated and designed the research, J.M, and Q.W. performed the experiments, J.M. and L.N. analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript, S.P. revised and edited the manuscript and also provided advice on the experiments.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.FAOSTAT. FAO Statistical databases. www.fao.org. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations, Rome (2014).
  • 2.Peng S, Tang Q, Zou Y. Current status and challenges of rice production in china. Plant Prod. Sci. 2009;12:3–8. doi: 10.1626/pps.12.3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.FAOSTAT. FAO Statistical databases. www.fao.org. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations, Rome (2011).
  • 4.Zhang, et al. Development and transition of rice planting in China. Agric. Sci. Technol. 2012;13:1270–1276. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cai H, Chen Q. Rice research in China in the early 21st century. Chinese Rice Res. Newsl. 2000;8:14–16. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Li Y. Water saving irrigation in china. Irrig. Drain. 2006;55:327–336. doi: 10.1002/ird.233. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kumar V, Ladha JK. Direct Seeding of Rice: Recent Developments and Future Research Needs. Adv. Agron. 2011;111:297–413. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-387689-8.00001-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Tao Y, Chen Q, Peng S, Wang W, Nie L. Lower global warming potential and higher yield of wet direct-seeded rice in central china. Agron. Sustain Dev. 2016;36:24. doi: 10.1007/s13593-016-0361-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Pandey, S. & Velasco, L. Economics of direct-seeding in Asia: Patterns of adoption and research priorities. In “Direct Seeding: Research Strategies and Opportunities” (Pandey, S., Mortimer, M., Wade, L., Tuong, T. P., Lopez, K. and Hardy, B. Eds.), Los Banos, Philippines: IRRI. pp. 3–14 (2002).
  • 10.Liu, et al. Dry direct-seeded rice as an alternative to transplanted-flooded rice in central china. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2015;35:285–294. doi: 10.1007/s13593-014-0239-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Rao AN, Johnson DE, Sivaprasad B, Ladha JK, Mortimer AM. Weed management in direct-seeded rice. Adv. Agron. 2007;93:153–255. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2113(06)93004-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Washio O. Direct seeding rice culture in Japan: its technical outlook. Farming Japan. 1992;26:11–19. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Du, L. V. & Tuong, T. P. Enhancing performance of dry-seeded rice: effects of seed priming, seeding rate, and time of seeding. In: Pandey, S., Mortimer, M., Wade, L., Tuong, T. P., Lopez, K., Hardy, B. eds. Direct seeding: research strategies and opportunities. Los Banos, Philippines: IRRI, 241–256 (2002).
  • 14.Ismail AM, Ella ES, Vergara GV, Mackill DJ. Mechanisms associated with tolerance to flooding during germination and early seedling growth in rice (oryza sativa) Ann. Bot. 2009;103:197–209. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcn211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bhuiyan, S. J., Abedin, M. L., Singh, V. P. & Hardy, B. Rice Research and Development in the Flood-Prone Ecosystem (Eds). International Rice Research Institute, Los Banos, Philippines. 237–249 (2004).
  • 16.Chen Y, Yin YX, Chen XW, Xu. WC. Change and future pattern of provincial flood affected areas in China: Possible relationship with climate change. Disaster Adv. 2012;5:321–326. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Sato T, Maruyama S. Seedling emergence and establishment under drained conditions in rice direct-sown into puddled and leveled soil. -Effect of calcium peroxide seed coating and sowing depth. Plant Prod. Sci. 2002;5:71–76. doi: 10.1626/pps.5.71. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sharma AR. Direct seeding and transplanting for rice production under flood-prone lowland conditions. Field Crop Res. 1995;44:129–137. doi: 10.1016/0378-4290(95)00078-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sasaki, T. Plant breeding: rice in deep water. Nat. 442–635 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 20.Powell AA, Matthews S. Seed treatments: developments and prospects. Outlook Agric. 1988;17:93–107. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Butler R. Coatings, films and treatments. Seed World. 1993;1993:18–24. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Taylor AG, et al. Seed enhancement. J. New Seeds. 1998;1:103–103. doi: 10.1300/J153v01n01_08. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ryu CM, Kim J, Choi O, Kim SH, Chang SP. Improvement of biological control capacity of paenibacillus polymyxa, E681 by seed pelleting on sesame. Biol. Control. 2006;39:282–289. doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2006.04.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ramesh K, Thirumurugan V. Effect of seed pelleting and foliar nutrition on growth of soybean. Madras Agric. J. 2001;88:465–468. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Asagi N, Ueno H, Sekiya H, Ogiwara H. Establishment of rice seedlings by direct sowing of multiple seed pellets on paddy soil covered with legume living mulch. Plant Prod. Sci. 2008;11:361–365. doi: 10.1626/pps.11.361. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Guan Y, et al. An enhanced drought-tolerant method using SA-loaded PAPMS polymer materials applied on tobacco pelleted seeds. Sci. world J. 2014;2014:752658–752658. doi: 10.1155/2014/752658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Yamada N. Calcium peroxide as an oxygen supplier for crop plants. Proc. Crop Sci. Soc. Jpn. 1951;21:65–66. doi: 10.1626/jcs.21.65. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ota Y, Nakayama M. Effect of seed coating with calcium peroxide on germination under submerged conditions in rice plant. Proc. Crop Sci. Soc. Jpn. 1970;39:535–536. doi: 10.1626/jcs.39.535. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Yamauchi M, Chuong PV. Rice seedling establishment as affected by cultivar, seed coating with calcium peroxide, sowing depth, and water level. Field Crop Res. 1995;41:123–134. doi: 10.1016/0378-4290(95)00008-E. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Yu PY, Xiong YF, Zou YB, Xu QG, Xiong HR. Effects of seed pelleting agent on the seed establishment and seedling growth in rice. Crop Res. 2004;18:141–144. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ellis MH, Setter TL. Hypoxia induces anoxia tolerance in completely submerged rice seedlings. J. Plant Physiol. 1999;154:219–230. doi: 10.1016/S0176-1617(99)80213-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Miro B, Ismail AM. Tolerance of anaerobic conditions caused by flooding during germination and early growth in rice (oryza sativa L.) Front. Plant Sci. 2012;4:1466–1478. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2013.00269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Magneschi L, Kudahettige RL, Alpi A, Perata P. Comparative analysis of anoxic coleoptile elongation in rice varieties: relationship between coleoptile length and carbohydrate levels, fermentative metabolism and anaerobic gene expression. Plant Biology. 2009;11:561–573. doi: 10.1111/j.1438-8677.2008.00150.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Simon A. Relationship between coleoptile and mesocotyl elongation of upland rice (oryza sativa L.) seedlings under submergence and soil-sand culture. Afr. J. Agr. Res. 2011;6:6463–6472. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Bailey-Serres J, Voesenek LA. Flooding stress: acclimations and genetic diversity. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2008;59:313–39. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092752. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Baker AM, Hatton W. Calcium peroxide as a seed coating material for padi rice. Plant Soil. 1987;99:379–386. doi: 10.1007/BF02370883. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Siegel SM, Gerschman R. A study of the toxic effects of elevated oxygen tension on plants. Physiol. Plantarum. 2006;12:314–323. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1959.tb07935.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Sarlistyaningsih L, Sivasithamparam K, Setter TL. Influence of waterlogging on germination and survival of lupin seeds (Lupinus angustifolius L. cv. gungurru) coated with calcium peroxide and streptomycin. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 1995;35:537–541. doi: 10.1071/EA9950537. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Hwang YS, Thomas BR, Rodriguez RL. Differential expression of rice alpha-amylase genes during seedling development under anoxia. Plant Mol. Bio. 1999;40:911–920. doi: 10.1023/A:1006241811136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Perata P, Pozueta-Romero J, Akazawa T, Yamaguchi J. Effect of anoxia on starch breakdown in rice and wheat seeds. Planta. 1992;188:611–818. doi: 10.1007/BF00197056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Guglielminetti L, Yamaguchi J, Perata P, Alpi A. Amylolytic activities in cereal seeds under aerobic and anaerobic conditions. Plant Physiol. 1995;109:1069–1076. doi: 10.1104/pp.109.3.1069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Hussain et al. Comparative transcriptional profiling of primed and non-primed rice seedlings under submergence stress. Front. Plant Sci. 7, 1125 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 43.Reggiani R, Brambilla I, Bertani A. Effect of exogenous nitrate on anaerobic metabolism in excised rice roots. J. Exp. Bot. 1985;36:1193–1199. doi: 10.1093/jxb/36.8.1193. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Rivoal J, Ricard B, Pradet A. Glycolytic and fermentative enzyme induction during anaerobiosis in rice seedlings. Plant Physiol. Bioch. 1989;1:43–52. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Ito O, Ella E, Kawano N. Physiological basis of submergence tolerance in rainfed lowland rice ecosystem. Field Crop Res. 1999;64:75–90. doi: 10.1016/S0378-4290(99)00052-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Magneschi L, Perata P. Rice germination and seedling growth in the absence of oxygen. Ann. Bot. 2008;103:181–196. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcn121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Avadhani PN, Greenway H, Lefroy R, Prior L. Alcoholic fermentation and malate metabolism in rice germinating at low oxygen concentrations. Funct. Plant Biol. 1978;5:15–25. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Alpi A, Beevers H. Effects of O2 concentration on rice seedlings. Plant Physiol. 1983;71:30–4. doi: 10.1104/pp.71.1.30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Setter TL, Ella ES. Relationship between coleoptile elongation and alcoholic fermentation in rice exposed to anoxia. I. importance of treatment conditions and different tissues. Ann. Bot. 1994;74:265–271. doi: 10.1006/anbo.1994.1117. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Gibbs J, Morrell S, Valdez A, Setter TL, Greenway H. Regulation of alcoholic fermentation in coleoptiles of two rice cultivars differing in tolerance to anoxia. J. Exp. Bot. 2000;51:785–96. doi: 10.1093/jxb/51.345.785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Waters I, Morrell S, Greenway H, Colmer TD. Effects of anoxia on wheat seedlings:II. Influence of O2 supply prior to anoxia on tolerance to anoxia, alcoholic fermentation, and sugar levels. J. Exp. Bot. 1991;42:1437–1447. doi: 10.1093/jxb/42.11.1437. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Mustroph A, et al. Organ specific analysis of the anaerobic primary metabolism in rice and wheat seedlings II: Light exposure reduces needs for fermentation and extends survival during anaerobiosis. Planta. 2006;225:139–152. doi: 10.1007/s00425-006-0336-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.AOSA Rules for testing seeds. Association of Official Seed Analysts (AOSA) J. Seed. Technol. 1990;12:1–112. [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Bernfeld, P. Methods in enzymology [149–158] (Academic Press, New York, USA, 1955).

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES