Abstract
Rosmarinic acid (RA) and its derivants are medicinal compounds that comprise the active components of several therapeutics. We isolated and characterised a tyrosine aminotransferase of Prunella vulgaris (PvTAT). Deduced PvTAT was markedly homologous to other known/putative plant TATs. Cytoplasmic localisation of PvTAT was observed in tobacco protoplasts. Recombinantly expressed and purified PvTAT had substrates preference for L-tyrosine and phenylpyruvate, with apparent K m of 0.40 and 0.48 mM, and favoured the conversion of tyrosine to 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate. In vivo activity was confirmed by functional restoration of the Escherichia coli tyrosine auxotrophic mutant DL39. Agrobacterium rhizogenes-mediated antisense/sense expression of PvTAT in hairy roots was used to evaluate the contribution of PvTAT to RA synthesis. PvTAT were reduced by 46–95% and RA were decreased by 36–91% with low catalytic activity in antisense transgenic hairy root lines; furthermore, PvTAT were increased 0.77–2.6-fold with increased 1.3–1.8-fold RA and strong catalytic activity in sense transgenic hairy root lines compared with wild-type counterparts. The comprehensive physiological and catalytic evidence fills in the gap in RA-producing plants which didn’t provide evidence for TAT expression and catalytic activities in vitro and in vivo. That also highlights RA biosynthesis pathway in P. vulgaris and provides useful information to engineer natural products.
Introduction
The popular medicinal plant, Prunella vulgaris, known as ‘heal-all’ or ‘self-heal’, has therapeutical applications in alleviating sore throats, reducing fever, and accelerating wound healing1. Rosmarinic acid (RA), a phenolic ester, is a prominent secondary metabolite member of the Lamiaceae and Boraginaceae. This compound and its derivates show many notable biological and pharmacological activities, such as anti-colitic2, antioxidant3, 4, anti-inflammatory5, 6, anti-leukemic7, and anticancer activities8, 9, as well as neuroprotective activity10, 11, which has led to their pharmaceutical and analytical development, and examination in clinical studies. In vitro culture systems producing RA, including callus, suspension cell cultures, hairy root cultures, and shoot cultures, have been successfully established from many plant species, such as Coleus blumei 12, 13, Anchusa officinalis 14, Salvia miltiorrhiza 15, 16, Salvia officinalis 17, Agastache rugosa 18, Ocimum basilicum 19, 20, and Coleus forskohlii 21. RA levels in some in vitro culture systems are higher than in the parent plant. Engineered production of RA and its analogues have also been achieved in an Escherichia coli culture system22–24.
Feeding radioactively labeled amino acids to Mentha plants and Coleus suspension cell cultures have revealed that phenylalanine (Phe) and tyrosine (Tyr) are the only respective amino acid precursors of the caffeoyl moiety and 3,4-hydroxyphenyllactic acid (DHPL) moiety of RA25–27. Tyrosine aminotransferase (TAT) was confirmed as the entry point enzyme of the tyrosine-derived pathway in RA biosynthesis28. Petersen, et al.29 proposed that RA biosynthesis in C. blumei involves both the phenylpropanoid pathway (for the caffeic acid moiety) and the tyrosine-derived pathway (for the DHPL moiety) (Fig. 1). Enzymes and genes of RA biosynthesis are well investigated in C. blumei, S. miltiorrhiza, Melissa officinalis, Lithospermum erythrorhizon, and other members of the Lamiaceae and Boraginaceae families30. TAT reversibly catalyses Tyr to 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate (4-HPP), which is the substrate for pathways producing plastoquinone31, 32, tocopherols33, phenolic acid14, 28, and benzylisoquinoline alkaloid (BIA)34 in plants, although tyrosine is synthesised from 4-HPP by TAT in bacteria. These Tyr-derived plant metabolites have a noteworthy structural complexity and a variety of pharmacological and biological activities, making them effective nutritional compounds and pharmaceutical drugs. RA is a major component of phenolic acids in Prunella vulgaris and controls the quality of this medicinal plant according to National Chinese Pharmacopeia35. Kim, et al.36 cloned the genes of enzymes involved in the phenylpropanoid branched-chain of the RA biosynthetic pathway in P. vulgaris, however, no biochemical or physiological information has been supported about these enzymes. Moreover, little information about enzymes involved in tyrosine-derived pathway is available in P. vulgaris.
Although the biochemical and structural characterisations of TATs in E. coli 38, Trypanosoma cruzi 39, mouse40, Leishmania infantum 41, and Homo sapiens (Protein Data Bank code, 3dyd) are well established, considerably less information about these enzymes is available in plants. Three activities of TAT have been extensively purified and characterised from A. officinalis cell cultures14. TAT has been implicated as the initial enzyme in tocopherol biosynthesis in Arabidopsis plants33, 42, 43, in aromatic volatiles biosynthesis of Cucumis melo fruits44, in BIA biosynthesis of Papaver somniferum 34, in an alternate pathway for phenylalanine biosynthesis45. Aminotransferase activity has been shown for Arabidopsis TATs33, 42, 46–48, C. melo ArAT144, 45, P. somniferum TAT34, rose PyAAAT349, petunia PhPPY-AT45, Atropa belladonna ArAT450, and Ephedra sinica AroAT151 by activity measurements of the isolated proteins expressed in bacterial systems and/or complementation of the auxotrophic E. coli strain DL39. Despite enhanced RA accumulation has been demonstrated by overexpressing TAT in S. miltiorrhiza hairy roots and transgenic P. frutescens plants52, 53. However, biochemical confirmation of their enzymatic activity has not been shown in major RA-producing plants. In plants, tocopherols and RA have been defined roles in free radical scavenging and in defence against abiotic and biotic stresses11, 54, and BIA are used by humans as stimulants, narcotics, and therapeutic agents50, 55. These natural products increase plant fitness and are also linked to potential benefits for human health.
Although much work has been done to identify the genes responsible for RA metabolism, the enzymes involved in the supply of precursors are still poorly defined in P. vulgaris. Here, we isolated and characterised tyrosine aminotransferase cDNA (PvTAT) using homology-based cloning, determined its subcellular localisation, characterised the heterologously overexpressed protein, and showed its functional complementation for tyrosine auxotrophic mutant DL39. Moreover, antisense/sense-based expression showed PvTAT is involved in RA biosynthesis in planta.
Results
Identification of a tyrosine aminotransferase as a candidate rosmarinic acid biosynthetic enzyme
A deep transcriptome database was generated by 454 GS-FLX Titanium pyrosequencing using a cDNA library prepared from P. vulgaris root (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/SRX130243). In search of the transcriptome database of P. vulgaris using S. miltiorrhiza TAT (KM575934.1) and P. frutescens TAT (AJ458993.1) as the query sequence revealed the presence of highly homologous unigenes (similarity > 80%). We used homologous cloning and obtained a cDNA belonging to the PLP-dependent Asp aminotransferase superfamily (AAT-like proteins) and also belonging to the tyrosine aminotransferase (TAT) subfamily according to the Panther classification system (http://www.pantherdb.org/). The cDNA contained a 1,236-bp ORF (Supplemental Fig. S1, lane 1) and encoded a predicted translation product of 411 amino acids with a molecular mass of 45 kDa and an isoelectric point of 5.97. The gene had a sequence of 2,634-bp (Supplemental Fig. S1, lane 2) with seven extrons and six introns and was identical to the cDNA except for three nucleotides. These differences did not result in amino acid substitutions.
An amino acid alignment of the predicted PvTAT sequence and selected homologs indicates that each contains a conserved catalytic lysine that corresponds to residue 246 in PvTAT, along with conserved residues required for the binding of the pyridoxal-5′-phosphate cofactor (Fig. 2a). The NCBI Conserved Domain Database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Structure/cdd/cdd.shtml) structure prediction tool also suggested that the PvTAT candidate possessed several homodimer interfaces. An unrooted neighbour-joining tree representing the phylogenetic relationships between the putative PvTAT and related enzymes is shown in Fig. 2b. PvTAT showed the highest sequence identity (76–93%) with S. miltiorrhiza SmTAT (ABC60050), P. frutescens PfTAT (ADO17550.1), Solenostemon scutellaridoides SsTAT (CAD30341), and Scutellaria baicalensis SbTAT (AIV98132.1) from the same Labiatae family. The PvTAT protein also exhibited considerable sequence identity (65–75%) with Solanum pennellii SpTAT (ADZ24702.1), A. belladonna Ab-ArAT1 (AHN10101.1), A. belladonna Ab-ArAT5 (AHN10105.1), Medicago truncatula MtTAT (AAY85183.1), Glycine max GmTAT (AAY21813.1), and Theobroma cacao TcTAT (XP_007021573.1). However, it is important to note that there is no biochemical confirmation of the enzymatic activities of these proteins available. In contrast, PvTAT showed 43–74% sequence identity with P. somniferum PsTAT (ADC33123.1)34, Arabidopsis AtTAT1 (AAK82963.1)42, 43, AtTAT2 (AF301899_1)56, AtTAT5 (NP_198465.3)46, AtTAT7 (NP_200208.1)33, 47, C. melo CmArAT1 (ADC45389)44, petunia PhPPY-AT (AHA62827.1)45, and E. sinica AroAT1 (AGK24944.1)51, which have been shown to function as TATs. Additionally, A. belladonna Ab-ArAT4 (AHN10104.1) preferentially catalyses the transamination of phenylalanine to phenylpyruvate and had a sequence identity of 66%50. Well characterised TATs in manmals showed 30% sequence identity, while there was 12–15% sequence identity with bacterial TATs. All identifies of the proteins used for phylogenetic analysis are provided in Supplemental Table S1.
Expression analysis of PvTAT
We measured the relative transcript expression level of PvTAT in different organs (roots, stems, leaves, and spikes) of P. vulgaris at complete flowering stage by qRT-PCR. PvTAT involved in RA biosynthesis was expressed in all the tissues but possessed distinct expression patterns. The highest transcript abundances were observed in root tissues, followed by leaves. The relative expression levels in roots and leaves were 4.6-and 2.8-fold higher than in the stems, while the transcript level in the spikes was set to 1 (Fig. 2c).
Cytoplasmic localisation of PvTAT
To experimentally determine the subcellular localisation of the PvTAT in planta, we expressed a PvTAT-GFP fusion protein in tobacco protoplasts. An engineered green-shifted green fluorescent protein (GFP), by itself or fused in frame to the C-terminus of TAT, was driven by the cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) 35S promoter. The resulting constructs or GFP alone were transformed into tobacco leaves. As shown in Fig. 2d, when GFP alone was expressed, fluorescence was observed almost throughout the cytoplasm and nucleus. Protoplasts with PvTAT-GFP exhibited a different pattern, only the cytoplasm spread fluorescence. Together, the difference between the PvTAT-GFP and GFP free fluorescence pattern suggests that PvTAT is localised in the cytoplasm, which is consistent with the prediction made by PSORT Prediction (http://psort.hgc.jp/form.html).
PvTAT possesses tyrosine aminotransferase activity
To functionally determine the in vitro biochemical roles of the putative PvTAT activity, the pET32a-TAT plasmid or empty vector was expressed in the E. coli strain Rosetta (DE3) and His-Tag purified to near homogeneity (Supplemental Fig. S2, lane 3). The purified recombinant TAT showed evidence of tyrosine aminotransferase activity (Supplemental Fig. S3a). Tyrosine aminotransferase activity in the forward direction forming 4-HPP and glutamate was found to be highest at pH 8.0 and 30 °C (Supplemental Fig. S3b,c), a pH optimum similar to that of found for the identified Arabidopsis At5g3616046. The substrate specificity of purified recombinant PvTAT was assessed using three aromatic amino acids as amino donors, together with several potential oxoacid acceptors as potential co-substrates. The activity of PvTAT indicates that it could use L-Tyr, L-Phe, and L-tryptophan (L-Trp) to varying degrees as amino donors and use α-ketoglutarate, pyruvate, oxaloacetate, and phenylpyruvate to diverse degrees as amino acceptors. With α-ketoglutarate as the amino acceptor, PvTAT shows higher preference for L-Tyr amino donor with an apparent K m of 0.40 mM than for L-Phe (K m of 10.2 mM) and L-Trp (K m of 8.14 mM) (Table 1; Supplemental Fig. S4a–c). The catalytic efficiency (k cat/K m) for L-Tyr was 20- and 23-fold greater than that of L-Phe and L-Trp. With L-Tyr as the amino donor, PvTAT preferentially utilises aromatic oxoacid phenylpyruvate with a K m of 3.90 mM as the amino acceptor, other than aliphatic oxoacid (α-ketoglutarate, pyruvate, and oxaloacetate with a K m of 10.80, 52.06, and 4.72 mM, respectively) (Table 1; Supplemental Fig. S4d–g). In the reverse direction with L-glutamate (L-Glu) as amino donor, PvTAT favours 4-HPP as oxoacid acceptor with a K m of 0.48 mM (Table 1; Supplemental Fig. S4h–j). To confirm TAT enzyme activity, the native enzyme was compared to heat-inactivated enzyme as a negative control. We determined that PvTAT preferentially catalyses the transamination of L-Tyr to form 4-hpp, which is used as substrate in RA biosynthesis. Unexpectedly, PvTAT has a preference for phenylpyruvate as the preferred amino acceptor rather than α-ketoglutarate. It is likely that PvTAT would catalyse the formation of phenylalanine from tyrosine and phenylpyruvate and that 4-HPP would be produced that in vivo would be channeled toward RA biosynthesis.
Table 1.
Variable substrate (Concentration in assay, mM) | Cosubstrate (Concentration in assay, mM) | V max (μmol min−1 mg−1) | K m (mM) | k cat (s−1) | k cat/K m (mM−1s−1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
L-Tyr (0–4) | α-ketoglutarate (10) | 1.74 ± 0.01 | 0.40 ± 0.05 | 1.19 ± 0.009 | 3.03 ± 0.35 |
L-Phe (0–50) | α-ketoglutarate (10) | 2.27 ± 0.03 | 10.2 ± 0.05 | 1.55 ± 0.02 | 0.15 ± 0.04 |
L-Trp (0–50) | α-ketoglutarate (10) | 1.53 ± 0.12 | 8.14 ± 1.04 | 1.05 ± 0.08 | 0.13 ± 0.008 |
α-ketoglutarate (0–100) | L-Tyr (5.5) | 0.92 ± 0.003 | 10.80 ± 0.19 | 0.63 ± 0.002 | 0.06 ± 0.008 |
Pyruvate (0–200) | L-Tyr (5.5) | 1.30 ± 0.02 | 52.06 ± 1.38 | 0.89 ± 0.01 | 0.02 ± 0.003 |
Oxaloacetate (0–300) | L-Tyr (5.5) | 1.06 ± 0.02 | 4.72 ± 0.05 | 0.73 ± 0.01 | 0.15 ± 0.005 |
Phenylpyruvate (0–20) | L-Tyr (5.5) | 0.43 ± 0.014 | 3.90 ± 0.067 | 0.30 ± 0.01 | 0.076 ± 0.001 |
4-HPP (0–10) | L-Glu (10) | 0.18 ± 0.021 | 0.48 ± 0.004 | 0.121 ± 0.01 | 0.295 ± 0.035 |
Phenylpyruvate (0–4) | L-Glu (10) | 0.22 ± 0.009 | 0.84 ± 0.01 | 0.15 ± 0.006 | 0.18 ± 0.009 |
Oxaloacetate (0–40) | L-Glu (10) | 0.16 ± 0.006 | 1.82 ± 0.03 | 0.110 ± 0.004 | 0.060 ± 0.004 |
The K m and V max values were calculated from the Michaelis-Menten equation using a non-linear regression method with curveexpert1.4.
Note: For the calculation of k cat, a molecular weight of 65 kDa was assumed for the His-tagged TAT protein. And k cat was calculated by dividing V max by Et (the number [pmol] of enzymes in each assay). The assay measured the production of 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate at 331 nm, phenylpyruvate at 320 nm, and indole-3-pyruvate at 328 nm corresponding to the substrates L-tyrosine, L-phenylalanine, and L-tryptophan. For the reverse direction, the assay measured the production of NADH at 340 nm.
TAT functionally complements the E. coli tyrosine auxotrophic mutant DL39
To examine PvTAT activity in vivo, the recombinant pBAD33-TAT plasmid or pBAD3357 was transformed into the E. coli triple mutant DL3958 for an initial functional complementation assay. This strain has mutations in tyrB (tyrosine aminotransferase), aspC (aspartate aminotransferase), and ilvE (branched-chain aminotransferase), leading to auxotrophy for tyrosine, phenylalanine, aspartate, valine, isoleucine and, leucine. As shown in Fig. 3a, all transformants could grow in M9 medium supplemented with tyrosine, phenylalanine, leucine, isoleucine and valine, whereas only clones transformed with PvTAT were able to grow on M9 medium devoid of tyrosine and phenylalanine. Figure 3b displays the growth curve of the E. coli mutant transformed with the native plasmid or the plasmid expressing PvTAT. Bacteria transformed with PvTAT grew continuously, while the bacteria transformed with the native plasmid showed little growth over 20 hours. The complementation was only specific to the tyrosine and phenylalanine auxotrophy, because growth did not occur without aspartate or the branched chain amino acids leucine, isoleucine and valine in combination (Fig. 3c). These results show that the putative PvTAT functionally complements the auxotrophic E. coli mutant and does not participate in the anabolic pathways for aspartate, leucine, isoleucine, and valine.
PvTAT is involved in RA synthesis in P. vulgaris
To determine whether PvTAT is involved in RA biosynthesis in planta, we used an antisense/sense expression-based approach to develop transgenic hairy root lines with regulated levels of PvTAT transcription. Wild-type hairy root lines with untransformed A. rhizogenes ATCC 15834 and hairy root lines transformed with empty vector pCAMBIA2300 were used as wide-type control and vector control, respectively. PCR amplification of rolB/C gene, nptII, and PvTAT confirmed the transformed lines (Supplemental Fig. S5). Despite the relatively low transgenic rate, four antisense and five sense PvTAT-expressing hairy root lines were developed that showed 46–95% decreases and 0.77–2.6-fold increases, respectively, in transcription levels relative to the wild-type lines (Fig. 4a). To investigate the degree of decrease/increase in total TAT activity due to the antisense/sense expression of PvTAT, we assayed TAT activity in the hairy root lines. Total activity was reduced by 23–67% in antisense-expressing hairy root lines and increased by 43–60% in sense-expressing hairy root lines (Fig. 4b), consistent with the expectation that the antisense/sense expression of PvTAT leads to loss/gain of TAT activity. Reduced PvTAT expression and activity resulted in a decrease in RA levels by 36–92% in all downregulated lines. Increased PvTAT expression and activity led to an increase in RA accumulation by 31–83% in all overexpressing lines (Fig. 4c). The positive relationship between PvTAT expression, TAT activity, and RA accumulation suggests that PvTAT serves an important role in the production of RA in P. vulgaris (Fig. 4d). Together, these results provide in vivo evidence of the major role of PvTAT in RA biosynthesis in P. vulgaris.
Discussion
In plants, many substances are derived from tyrosine, such as RA, homogentisate, tocopherol, and BIA, which contribute to human health. RA and its numerous derivatives have many potential nutraceutical and pharmaceutical applications11. Since RA was first discovered and isolated in Rosmarinus officinasis 59, researchers have been studying its biogenesis. Because of its biological and pharmaceutical importance, RA has been studied in many medicinal plant species. TAT genes involved in RA biosynthesis have been cloned from C. blumei, S. miltiorrhiza 15, and P. frutescens 53. Aminotransferase activity are also implicated in the biosynthesis of aromatic volatiles, tocopherol, BIA, and tropane alkaloid and have been characterised in melons, Arabidopsis, P. somniferum, and A. belladonna 34, 42–44, 46, 50, 51, respectively. Here, we cloned the entry-point enzyme TAT from P. vulgaris, a member of the Labiatae. Through the isolation and characterisation of TAT from P. vulgaris, we provide biochemical and physiological evidence for the involvement of 4-HPP as an intermediate in RA biosynthesis (Fig. 1).
Based on a phylogenetic tree of sequence similarity, plant, mammalian, and bacterial TATs all differ from each other despite being grouped in the same subdivision within the same subgroup of the class I aminotransferases60, 61. Conserved amino acid residues responsible for catalysis and binding PLP are found in all proteins (Fig. 2a). Among them, Lys residue is the catalytic sites interacting with the pyridine nitrogen of PLP. Lys-246 may perform this catalytic function in PvTAT. Arg in the highly conserved attachment site is one of the residues responsible for the interaction of Tyr with TAT40, and Arg-254 may play this role in PvTAT (Fig. 2a). Although PvTAT shares only 15% amino acid identity with E. coli TAT, it was able to complement the E. coli mutant DL3958 (Fig. 3a). This was also the case for Arabidopsis At5g36160, At5g53970, and PhPPY-AT33, 42, 45. None these are involved in the anabolic pathways for leucine, valine, isoleucine, and aspartate (Fig. 3c).
In plants, despite L-Phe and L-Tyr are synthesised in plasmids from prephenate, which is derived from chorismate formed through the shikimate pathway62. Secondary metabolites, like phenolic acid, flavonoids, volatiles, alkaloids, tocopherols, and cyanogenic glycoside and proteins are derived from the aromatic amino acids L-Phe and L-Tyr63. However, plants have retained multiple TATs that likely utilise L-Phe and L-Tyr as substrates and are not plastid localised, but rather cytosol localised. A petunia PhPPY-AT localised in the cytosol was able to directly catalyse the formation of L-Phe from phenylpyruvate using L-Tyr as the amino donor, yielding 4-HPP as a by-product45. Moreover, an A. belladonna ArAT4, which is not localised to any organelle, was able to directly catalyse the formation of L-Tyr from 4-HPP using L-Phe as the amino donor, yielding phenylpyruvate as a by-product50. The two reactions are mutually inverse and are analogous to the formation of L-Phe and L-Tyr in bacteria, demonstrating the existence of a second, direct, extraplastidic route to L-Phe and L-Tyr biosynthesis in plants and leading to a proposed role for PhPPY-AT and Ab-ArAT4 in modulating aromatic amino acid homeostasis45, 50. Arabidopsis TAT genes (At2g24850, At5g53970) were both shown to encode the enzyme capable of interconverting L-Tyr and 4-HPP, as well as L-Phe and phenylpyruvate, catalysing the first step in tocopherol biosynthesis45, 64. Another Arabidopsis TAT gene (At5g36160) was also reported to be capable of interconverting L-Tyr and 4-HPP, as well as L-Phe and phenylpyruvate46. More recently, Wang, et al.48 reported that Arabidopsis At5g53970 favoured the direction of Tyr deamination to 4-HPP but At5g36160 preferred the reverse reaction, both were localised outside of the plastids. The opium poppy TAT was as an aminotransferase capable of interconverting L-Tyr and 4-HPP, as well as L-Phe and phenylpyruvate, and contributed to BIA biosynthesis34. Additionally, an E. sinica aromatic aminotransferases (EsAroAT1) was showed to function as opium poppy TAT, but is unlikely to contribute to ephedrine alkaloid biosynthesis through the catabolism of L-Phe to phenylpyruvate as a precursor to benzaldehyde51. Herein, PvTAT was also confirmed to localise in the cytoplasm and is an aminotransferase capable of interconverting L-Tyr and 4-HPP, interconverting L-Phe and phenylpyruvate (Fig. 2e, Supplemental Fig. S3, Table 1). Antisense expression of PvTAT led to dramatically decreased RA accumulation (Fig. 4c), confirming the involvement of this enzyme in the formation of RA in P. vulgaris.
Although we cannot role out that PvTAT may have amino donor substrates other than L-Tyr, L-Phe, and L-Trp, we demonstrated its strong preference for L-Tyr over the structurally related amino acid L-Phe and L-Trp (Table 1), similar behavior with A. officinalis TATs14, Arabidopsis At5g36160 and At5g5397045, 46, 48, opium poppy TAT34, and E. sinica AroAT151. A recombinant TAT from T. cruzi was shown to have both tyrosine aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase activities, displaying an extended substrate enzyme activity65. Traditionally, TAT enzymes have been characterised with aliphatic keto acid (α-ketoglutarate, oxaloacetate, and pyruvate) as acceptors and α-ketoglutarate or oxaloacetate was considered as the preferred keto acid acceptor14, 33, 34, 46. However, this perception has been changed since the characterisation of PhPPY-AT and CmArAT1 showed a preference for phenylpyruvate rather than α-ketoglutarate, and interconnected Tyr and Phe metabolism in petunia and melon45, more and more aminotransferases were found with similar behavior. Ab-ArAT4 has been characterised to prefer the conversion of 4-HPP to Tyr using Phe amino donor, also interconnecting Tyr and Phe metabolism in A. belladonna 50. What’s more, Arabidopsis At5g53970 was showed phenylpyruvate preference and may contribute to the cytosolic formation of Phe, like for phenylpropanoid biosynthesis, similar to its homolog in petunia48. Our work shows that PvTAT shows a substrate preference toward Tyr and phenylpyruvate (Table 1). However, the K m (approx. 4 mM) for the best acceptor substrate (phenylpyruvate) is high and there may be more preferred substrates in vivo. Based on the presented data, PvTAT appears to be not an enzyme with high efficiency when compared with Arabidopsis At5g53970 and Ab-ArAT4 but possesses similar catalytic efficiencies to Arabidopsis At5g36160 and PhPPY-AT.
Many attempts have been made to engineer increased RA production by diverting more primary metabolites toward the production of 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate or by the regulation of biotic/abiotic factors. Co-expression of SmTAT and SmHPPR in S. miltiorrhiza increased RA by 4.3-fold, although overexpression of SmTAT alone did not increase RA content52. Overexpression of the PfTAT gene from P. frutescens led to RA levels to be 1.5–2.0 folds higher than controls53. By combining the genetic manipulation of the ectopic expression of AtPAP1 and co-suppression of the cinnamoyl-CoA reductase and caffeic acid O-methyltransferase genes in S. miltiorrhiza, a 2.49-fold increase of RA was obtained66. Our data showed that overexpression of the PvTAT in hairy roots increased TAT expression, followed by increased enzyme activity, and and 31–83% increases in RA accumulation (Fig. 4c). In contrast, antisense expression of PvTAT successfully suppressed TAT expression, followed by decreased enzyme activity and RA accumulation, especially in antisense line 3 and 4, with 90% and 92% decreases in RA accumulation (Fig. 4c). The positive relationship between PvTAT mRNA levels, total TAT activity, and RA accumulation suggest that PvTAT has an important role in the production of this phenolic acid in P. vulgaris. The biochemical characterisation of a recombinant TAT in vitro, coupled with the physiological evaluation of function in planta, supports the role of 4-HPP as an intermediate in the formation of RA precursors.
Together, we presented the isolation and characterisation a tyrosine aminotransferases cDNA (PvTAT) from P. vulgaris, commonly known as “heal-all”. We have provided comprehensive information for PvTAT expression and test for the catalytic activities in vitro and in vivo, which fill in the gap in PA-producing plants. What’s more, the physiological evidence that PvTAT important for the synthesis of rosmarinic acid (RA) in P. vulgaris was confirmed by modest correlation between transcript level, TAT activity, and RA accumulation. These results highlight the RA biosynthesis pathway in P. vulgaris, and provide useful information to engineer natural products. These observations open an opportunity to modulate the level of this biotechnologically and pharmaceutically important phenolic acid through the modulation of PvTAT expression.
Materials and Methods
P. vulgaris RNA and DNA isolation and cDNA synthesis
Total RNA from P. vulgaris leaves was isolated using the RNAprep pure Plant Kit (TIANGEN, Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer’s protocol and reverse transcribed to generate cDNA using the PrimeScript RT reagent kit (Takara, Japan). Genomic DNA was isolated from P. vulgaris leaves using a DNA isolation kit (Omega, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocol.
Amplification of PvTAT cDNA
Homologous cloning was used to obtain the ORF sequence of P. vulgaris. The same Labiatae family members of S. miltiorrhiza (KM575934.1) and C. blumei (AJ458993.1) TAT sequences were used as the query sequence to locally blast against P. vulgaris transcriptome database (Genebank SRX130243) with BioEdit (v7.0.9). Unigenes with more than 80% similarity were chose and assembled using SeqMan of DNAStar. A joint and predicted PvTAT ORF sequence was then obtained. A PCR reaction was carried out using the forward primer (5′-ATGGAGTTGCAGAGCTCGGCGCAG-3′) and the reverse primer (5′-TTAGTAGGAGTGTCGTTCGCAGAAC-3′) to amplify PvTAT ORF sequence. Using the same primer pairs, the DNA sequence was amplified using the DAN as a template.
Multiple sequence alignment and phylogenetic analysis
Amino acid alignments were performed using DNAMAN 7.0. An unrooted neighbour-joining phylogenetic tree was constructed using MEGA version 5.05 with the Poisson model and default parameters. A bootstrap test of 1000 replicates was used to value the reliability of the phylogeny. The proteins used for sequence alignments and phylogenetic tree construction are available in Supplemental Table S1.
Transcription analysis of PvTAT
Plant materials were described in Ru, et al.67. At the reproductive stage, leaves, stems, roots, and spikes were separately sampled and kept at −80 °C before use. Extraction and reverse-transcription of total RNA were carried out as mentioned above. Gene expression was determined by qRT-PCR following our previous method68 and is shown relative to the expression level of the housekeeping gene β-actin. Relative expression was calculated using the 2−ΔΔt method. Transcript levels of related genes in the spike were set to 1. Data are means ± SD of three replicates of three independent individuals. Tukey HSD test was used to compare the difference among tissues. Primers were listed in Supplementary Table S2.
Subcelluar localisation analysis of PvTAT
The full-length ORF sequence introduced XhoI and NcoI restriction sites was subcloned into the PC0390-pA7-GFP plasmid to produce TAT-GFP fusion proteins. Construction of recombinant plasmid and transient transformation of tobacco were referenced to our previous method67. Tobacco protoplasts and leaves were both observed for the determination of PvTAT locolisation. Images were acquired using a confocal microscope (Nikon, Japan) and software of NIS-Elements Viewer 4.0. The PC0390-pA7-GFP plasmid was used as a marker. GFP was excited at 488 nm and collected over a 500–550 nm bandpass. Chlorophyll fluorescence was excited at 638 nm and collected over a 662–737 nm bandpass.
Expression and purification of recombinant proteins
The pET32a-TAT plasmid encoding PvTAT was constructed by PCR amplification of the PvTAT ORF sequence that introduced EcoRI and HindIII restriction sites. The PCR fragments were subcloned into the PMD19T Simple cloning vector (Takara) and checked by sequencing. The PMD19T-TAT plasmid and the pET32a (NEB, England) vector were digested by EcoRI-HindIII restriction enzymes to produce the fusion protein with an N-terminal His tag. The resulting plasmid was termed pET32a-TAT and transformed into the E. coli strain Rosetta (DE3).
Escherichia coli strain Rosetta (DE3) cells carrying the pET32a-TAT plasmids or the pET32a empty plasmids were grown at 37 °C in 500 ml of Terrific-Broth supplemented with 34 mg l−1 chloramphenicol and 100 mg l−1 carbenicillin. When the culture reached an OD600 of ~0.6, isopropyl-β-1-D-thiogalactoside (1 mM) was added to a final concentration of 0.3 mM to induce protein expression and the culture was incubated for 6 h. The cells were harvested by centrifugation at 10,000 g for 10 min at 4 °C. The pellet was washed twice with PBS buffer, suspended in 200 mM Tris, 100 mM KCl, and 10% glycerol (w/v), pH 8.0, and lysed by high-pressure broken using a cell disrupter (JN-02C, JNBIO, Guangzhou, China). The crude extract was centrifuged at 12,000 g for 20 min at 4 °C to yield a cell-free supernatant. The supernatant was used for affinity purification over His-Tag purification resin (Solaibao, Beijing, China). Proteins eluted with 250 mM imidazole were analysed by SDS-PAGE on a 12% (w/v) acrylamide gel and visualised using Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250 staining. Protein concentrations were determined using a Bradford Protein Assay Kit (Takara).
Western blotting analysis was determined as Wang, et al.69 described previously, except the protein was transferred to NC membrane (Solarbio). The membrane was incubated with anti-His antibodies at a dilution of 1:3000 in blocking buffer for 1 h, after washing with TBST buffer for 10 min, the membrane was then incubated with goat anti-rabbit IgG alkaline phosphatase-conjugated as secondary antibodies (1:3000 dilution) for 1 h. Antigen-antibody complex was visualised using the BCIP/NBT kit (Beyotime, China).
Enzyme assay
To measure TAT activity in P. vulgaris hairy root lines, proteins were extracted and determined as Lopukhina, et al.42 described previously with minor modification. Hairy roots (0.2 g fresh weight) were extracted with 3 ml of ice-cold buffer, containing 100 mM potassium phosphate buffer, 0.1 mM EDTA, 8.0 mM α-ketoglutarate, 0.2 mM pyridoxal-5-phosphate (PLP), and 1 mM dithiothreitol, pH 8.0. After centrifugation at 12,000 g at 4 °C for 10 min, the supernatant was incubated on ice and used as a crude extract enzyme. The reaction mixture containing 125 mM KH2PO4/K2HPO4 buffer, 5.5 mM L-Tyr, 0.75 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM PLP, and 10 mM α-ketoglutarate, pH 8.0, was pre-incubated at 30 °C for 30 min. The reaction was initiated by adding 200 μl of crude protein and incubated at 30 °C in a total volume of 3 ml. After 30 min the reaction was terminated with 1 ml of 10 M KOH and extinction of 4-hydroxybenzaldehyde (product derivative) was measured exactly 30 min later at 331 nm using an ultraviolet-visible spectrophotometer (UV-1700, SHIMADZU, Japan). The extinction coefficient used for 4-hydroxybenzaldehyde was 24 900 L mol−1cm−1 33.
To estimate the pH optimum for the recombinant protein, pH values were varied between 6 and 10 and 5 μl (0.2 μg) of purified protein was assayed as described above in a total volume of 1 ml. Enzyme kinetics were obtained by monitoring the absorbance of various transamination reaction products 4-HPP at 331 nm, phenylpyruvate at 320 nm, and indole-3-pyruvate at 328 nm corresponding to the substrates L-Tyr, L-Phe, and L-Trp. The assay contained 125 mM KH2PO4/K2HPO4 buffer, 0.75 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM PLP, and various substrate concentrations, pH 8.0, and incubated at 30 °C in a total volume of 1 ml. When α-ketoglutarate (10 mM) was the amino acceptor, 0–4 mM L-Tyr, 0–50 mM L-Phe, and 0–50 mM L-Trp were used as the amino donor. When L-Tyr (5.5 mM) was the amino donor, 0–100 mM α-ketoglutarate, 0–200 mM pyruvate, 0–300 mM oxaloacetate, and 0–40 mM phenylpyruvate were used as the amino acceptor.
For the reverse reaction, the assay was determined as Prabhu and Hudson46 described. The 100 μl assay mixture consisted of 125 mM KH2PO4/K2HPO4 buffer, 0.3 mM NAD, 0.3 mM CoA, 10 mM glutamate, 0.75 mM EDTA, 100 μg 2-ketoglutarate dehydrogenase (0.6 U mg−1 protein) (Sigma), 0.02 μg pure recombinant protein, pH 8.0. After incubated at 30 °C for 30 min, 0–4 mM phenylpyruvate, 0–10 mM 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate, or 0–40 mM oxaloacetate was added to initiate the reaction. NADH formation was measured at 340 nm using a Multi-Mode Microplate Readers (Spectra Max M 2, Molecular Devices, USA). The extinction coefficient used for NADH was 6220 L mol−1cm−1 33.
V max and K m values were calculated according to a nonlinear regression of the Michaelis-Menten equation, where V = (V maxS)/(K m + S)70. For the calculation of k cat, a molecular weight of 65 kDa was assumed for the His-tagged TAT protein. All enzyme assays were performed at an appropriate enzyme concentration so that reaction velocity was linear and proportional to enzyme concentration during the incubation time period. Kinetic data were evaluated by curveExpert 1.4. At least triplicate assays were performed for all data points.
Functional complementation of the E. coli DL39 mutant
The pET32a-TAT and pBAD3357 were both digested by XbaI-HindIII restriction enzymes to produce the pBAD33-TAT constructs. The E. coli auxotrophic mutant DL39 (no. 6913)58 with genotype (LAM-, aspC13, fnr-25, rph-1, ilvE12, tyrB507), obtained from the Coli Genome Stock Center (CGSC) (http://cgsc.biology.yale.edu/), was used for the complementation assays and transformed with either the pBAD33 or pBAD33-TAT constructs. Procedure of complementation assays were performed essentially as Prabhu and Hudson46 previously described.
Antisense and sense expression of PvTAT in planta
To construct pCAMBIA2300-TAT sense and antisense expression vectors, the PvTAT ORF, introduced XbaI and KpnI restriction sites, was inserted into the pCAMBIA2300 vector in sense and antisense orientations. Then, the pCAMBIA2300-TAT and pCAMBIA2300 plasmids were transformed into an A. rhizogenes strain ATCC 15834 using the heat shock method. Positive clones were confirmed by PCR and restriction enzymes digestion. Plant transformation was carried out according to our previous method68, except that the transformants were screened with cefotaxim solution and kanamycin together.
Identification of transgenic hairy roots by PCR
DNA was isolated from wild-type and transgenic hairy roots using a genomic DNA isolation kit (Omega) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Four primer pairs, rolB/C, nptII, 35S forward primer 1(35S F1), and STAT reverse primer (STAT R) were designed for the identification of sense-expressing hairy root lines. 35SF was located at the 35S promoter of the pCAMBIA2300 vector and STATR was from the PvTAT gene. 35S forward primer 2 (35SF2) and ATAT reverse primer (ATATR) were designed for the identification of antisense-expressing hairy root lines. ATATR was also from the PvTAT gene. Primers were shown in Supplemental Table S2.
HPLC assay for RA content
RA accumulation in wild-type hairy roots and transgenetic hairy root lines was assayed using HPLC according to our previous method68.
Analysis for PvTAT gene expression
qRT-PCR analysis for PvTAT gene expression in wild-type hairy roots and transgenetic hairy root lines was determined as mentioned above. Transcripts of PvTAT in the wild-type hairy root lines were set to 1.
Data analysis
One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to highlight differences in wide-type hairy root lines, hairy root lines transformed with empty vector, and transgenic hairy root lines followed by ‘Tukey HSD’ post-hoc multiple comparison tests. Normality and homogeneity of variance of data were assessed prior to analysis. All the data analyses were accomplished using the “Statistical Package” for Social Sciences program (SPSS 16.0, SPSS Inc., USA). OriginPro8.0 (OriginLab Corporation, Northampton, MA) was used for graphical presentation. All the data were expressed as means ± SD with triplicate replicates.
Electronic supplementary material
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by grants from the “Twelfth Five-Year” Plan for Science & Technology Support of China (no. 2015BAC01B03) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 81373908). We thank Coli Genome Stock Center for providing DL39 strain and pBAD33 vector free.
Author Contributions
R.M. and L.Z.S. conceived the original screening and research plans; L.Z.S. supervised the experiments; R.M., W.K.R., B.Z.Q. performed the experiments; P.L., H.S.X., W.Y. provided technical assistance; R.M. designed the experiments and analysed the data; R.M. and W.K.R. conceived the project and wrote the article with contributions of all the authors; L.Z.S. supervised and complemented the writing.
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Footnotes
Electronic supplementary material
Supplementary information accompanies this paper at doi:10.1038/s41598-017-05290-4
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Psotová J, Kolář M, Soušek J, Švagera Z, et al. Biological activities of Prunella vulgaris extract. Phytotherapy Research. 2003;17:1082–1087. doi: 10.1002/ptr.1324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Jeong S, Park H, Hong S, Yum S, et al. Lipophilic modification enhances anti-colitic properties of rosmarinic acid by potentiating its HIF-prolyl hydroxylases inhibitory activity. European Journal of Pharmacology. 2015;747:114–122. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2014.11.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Erkan N, Ayranci G, Ayranci E. Antioxidant activities of rosemary (Rosmarinus Officinalis L.) extract, blackseed (Nigella sativa L.) essential oil, carnosic acid, rosmarinic acid and sesamol. Food Chem. 2008;110:76–82. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.01.058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bakota EL, Winkler-Moser JK, Berhow MA, Eller FJ, et al. Antioxidant Activity and Sensory Evaluation of a Rosmarinic Acid-Enriched Extract of Salvia officinalis. J Food Sci. 2015;80:C711–C717. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.12837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Tsai TH, Chuang LT, Lien TJ, Liing YR. Rosmarinus officinalis Extract Suppresses Propionibacterium acnes-Induced Inflammatory Responses. Journal of Medicinal Food. 2013;16:324–333. doi: 10.1089/jmf.2012.2577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kuruuzum-Uz A, Suleyman H, Cadirci E, Guvenalp Z, Demirezer LO. Investigation on anti-inflammatory and antiulcer activities of Anchusa azurea extracts and their major constituent rosmarinic acid. Zeitschrift fur Naturforschung. C: A Journal of Biosciences. 2012;67:360–366. doi: 10.5560/ZNC.2012.67c0360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Heo S-K, Noh E-K, Yoon D-J, Jo J-C, et al. Rosmarinic acid potentiates ATRA-induced macrophage differentiation in acute promyelocytic leukemia NB4 cells. European Journal of Pharmacology. 2015;747:36–44. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2014.10.064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Yesil-Celiktas O, Sevimli C, Bedir E, Vardar-Sukan F. Inhibitory Effects of Rosemary Extracts, Carnosic Acid and Rosmarinic Acid on the Growth of Various Human Cancer Cell Lines. Plant food hum nutr. 2010;65:158–163. doi: 10.1007/s11130-010-0166-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Tai J, Cheung S, Wu M, Hasman D. Antiproliferation effect of Rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis) on human ovarian cancer cells in vitro. Phytomedicine. 2012;19:436–443. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2011.12.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Pereira P, Tysca D, Oliveira P, da Silva Brum LF, et al. Neurobehavioral and genotoxic aspects of rosmarinic acid. pharmacol Res. 2005;52:199–203. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2005.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kim G-D, Park YS, Jin Y-H, Park C-S. Production and applications of rosmarinic acid and structurally related compounds. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2015;99:2083–2092. doi: 10.1007/s00253-015-6395-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bauer N, Leljak-Levanic D, Jelaska S. Rosmarinic acid synthesis in transformed callus culture of Coleus blumei Benth. Zeitschrift fur Naturforschung. C: A J Biosci. 2004;59:554–560. doi: 10.1515/znc-2004-7-819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Petersen M, Häusler E, Meinhard J, Karwatzki B, et al. The biosynthesis of rosmarinic acid in suspension cultures of Coleus blumei. Plant cell tiss org. 1994;38:171–179. doi: 10.1007/BF00033875. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.De-Eknamkul W, Ellis BE. Purification and characterization of tyrosine aminotransferase activities from Anchusa officinalis cell cultures. Archives of biochemistry and biophysics. 1987;257:430–438. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(87)90587-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Huang B, Yi B, Duan Y, Sun L, et al. Characterization and expression profiling of tyrosine aminotransferase gene from Salvia miltiorrhiza (Dan-shen) in rosmarinic acid biosynthesis pathway. Mol Biol Rep. 2008;35:601–612. doi: 10.1007/s11033-007-9130-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Chen H, Chen F, Zhang Y-L, Song J-Y. Production of rosmarinic acid and lithospermic acid B in Ti transformed Salvia miltiorrhiza cell suspension cultures. Process Biochem. 1999;34:777–784. doi: 10.1016/S0032-9592(98)00155-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Grzegorczyk I, Matkowski A, Wysokińska H. Antioxidant activity of extracts from in vitro cultures of Salvia officinalis L. Food Chemistry. 2007;104:536–541. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.12.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Lee SY, Xu H, Kim YK, Park SU. Rosmarinic acid production in hairy root cultures of Agastache rugosa Kuntze. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2007;24:969–972. doi: 10.1007/s11274-007-9560-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Tada H, Murakami Y, Omoto T, Shimomura K, et al. Rosmarinic acid and related phenolics in hairy root cultures of Ocimum basilicum. Phytochemistry. 1996;42:431–434. doi: 10.1016/0031-9422(96)00005-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Strazzer P, Guzzo F, Levi M. Correlated accumulation of anthocyanins and rosmarinic acid in mechanically stressed red cell suspensions of basil (Ocimum basilicum) J Plant physiol. 2011;168:288–293. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2010.07.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Li W, Koike K, Asada Y, Yoshikawa T, et al. Rosmarinic acid production by Coleus forskohliihairy root cultures. Plant cell tiss org. 2005;80:151–155. doi: 10.1007/s11240-004-9541-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Jiang J, Bi H, Zhuang Y, Liu S, et al. Engineered synthesis of rosmarinic acid in Escherichia coli resulting production of a new intermediate, caffeoyl-phenyllactate. Biotechnol Lett. 2016;38:81–88. doi: 10.1007/s10529-015-1945-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Bloch SE, Schmidt-Dannert C. Construction of a Chimeric Biosynthetic Pathway for the De Novo Biosynthesis of Rosmarinic Acid in Escherichia coli. ChemBioChem. 2014;15:2393–2401. doi: 10.1002/cbic.201402275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Zhuang Y, Jiang J, Bi H, Yin H, et al. Synthesis of rosmarinic acid analogues in Escherichia coli. Biotechnol Lett. 2016;38:619–627. doi: 10.1007/s10529-015-2011-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ellis BE, Towers GHN. Biogenesis of Rosmarinic Acid in Mentha. Biochem J. 1970;118:291–297. doi: 10.1042/bj1180291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Razzaque A, Ellis BE. Rosmarinic acid production in Coleus cell cultures. Planta. 1977;137:287–291. doi: 10.1007/BF00388164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ellis BE, Remmen S, Goeree G. Interactions between parallel pathways during biosynthesis of rosmarinic acid in cell suspension cultures of Coleus blumei. Planta. 1979;147:163–167. doi: 10.1007/BF00389519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Wanchai D-E, Brian EE. Tyrosine aminotransferase: The entrypoint enzyme of the tyrosine-derived pathway in rosmarinic acid biosynthesis. Phytochemistry. 1987;26:1941–1946. doi: 10.1016/S0031-9422(00)81734-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Petersen M, Häusler E, Karwatzki B, Meinhard J. Proposed biosynthetic pathway for rosmarinic acid in cell cultures of Coleus blumei Benth. Planta. 1993;189:10–14. doi: 10.1007/BF00201337. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Petersen M. Rosmarinic acid: new aspects. Phytochem rev. 2013;12:207–227. doi: 10.1007/s11101-013-9282-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Soll J. α-Tocopherol and Plastoquinone Synthesis in Chloroplast Membranes. Methods In Enzymology. 1987;148:383–392. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(87)48037-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Loffelhardt W, Kindl H. Conversion of 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvic acid into homogentisic acid at the thylakoid membrane of Lemna gibba. Febs Lett. 1979;104:332–336. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(79)80845-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Riewe D, Koohi M, Lisec J, Pfeiffer M, et al. A tyrosine aminotransferase involved in tocopherol synthesis in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2012;71:850–859. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2012.05035.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Lee E-J, Facchini PJ. Tyrosine aminotransferase contributes to benzylisoquinoline alkaloid biosynthesis in opium poppy. Plant physiology. 2011;157:1067–1078. doi: 10.1104/pp.111.185512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.National Pharmacopoeia Committee. Chinese Pharmacopoeia (Chemical Industry Press, 2015).
- 36.Kim, Y. B., Shin, Y., Tuan, P. A. & Li, X. et al. Molecular cloning and characterization of genes involved in rosmarinic acid biosynthesis from Prunella vulgaris. Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin (2014). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 37.Petersen M. Cytochrome P450-dependent hydroxylation in the biosynthesis of rosmarinic acid in Coleus. Phytochemistry. 1997;45:1165–1172. doi: 10.1016/S0031-9422(97)00135-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Ko T-P, Wu S-P, Yang W-Z, Tsai H, et al. Crystallization and preliminary crystallographic analysis of the Escherichia coli tyrosine aminotransferase. Acta Crystallographica Section D. 1999;55:1474–1477. doi: 10.1107/S0907444999006630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Blankenfeldt W, Nowick iC, Montemartini-Kalisz M, Kalisz HM, et al. Crystal structure of Trypanosoma cruzi tyrosine aminotransferase: substrate specificity is influenced by cofactor binding mode. Protein Science. 1999;8:2406. doi: 10.1110/ps.8.11.2406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Mehere P, Han Q, Lemkul JA, Vavricka CJ, et al. Tyrosine aminotransferase: biochemical and structural properties and molecular dynamics simulations. Protein & Cell. 2010;1:1023–1032. doi: 10.1007/s13238-010-0128-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Moreno MA, Abramov A, Abendroth J, Alonso A, et al. Structure of tyrosine aminotransferase from Leishmania infantum. Acta Crystallographica Section F. 2014;70:583–587. doi: 10.1107/S2053273314013643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Lopukhina A, Dettenberg M, Weiler EW, Holländer-Czytko H. Cloning and characterization of a coronatine-regulated tyrosine aminotransferase from Arabidopsis. Plant physiology. 2001;126:1678–1687. doi: 10.1104/pp.126.4.1678. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Holländer-Czytko H, Grabowski J, Sandorf I, Weckermann K, et al. Tocopherol content and activities of tyrosine aminotransferase and cystine lyase in Arabidopsis under stress conditions. J Plant Physiol. 2005;162:767–770. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2005.04.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Gonda I, Bar E, Portnoy V, Lev S, et al. Branched-chain and aromatic amino acid catabolism into aroma volatiles in Cucumis melo L. fruit. J Exp Bot. 2010;61:1111–1123. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erp390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Yoo, H., Widhalm, J. R., Qian, Y. & Maeda, H. et al. An alternative pathway contributes to phenylalanine biosynthesis in plants via a cytosolic tyrosine:phenylpyruvate aminotransferase. Nat Commun4, doi:10.1038/ncomms3833 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 46.Prabhu, P. R. & Hudson, A. O. Identification and partial characterization of an L-tyrosine aminotransferase (TAT) from Arabidopsis thaliana. Biochemistry research international2010 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 47.Grossmann K, Hutzler J, Tresch S, Christiansen N, et al. On the mode of action of the herbicides cinmethylin and 5-benzyloxymethyl-1, 2-isoxazolines: putative inhibitors of plant tyrosine aminotransferase. Pest manag sci. 2012;68:482–492. doi: 10.1002/ps.2319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Wang M, Toda K, Maeda HA. Biochemical properties and subcellular localization of tyrosine aminotransferases in Arabidopsis thaliana. Phytochemistry. 2016;132:16–25. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2016.09.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Hirata H, Ohnishi T, Ishida H, Tomida K, et al. Functional characterization of aromatic amino acid aminotransferase involved in 2-phenylethanol biosynthesis in isolated rose petal protoplasts. Journal of Plant Physiology. 2012;169:444–451. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2011.12.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Bedewitz MA, Góngora-Castillo E, Uebler JB, Gonzales-Vigil E, et al. A Root-Expressed l-Phenylalanine:4-Hydroxyphenylpyruvate Aminotransferase Is Required for Tropane Alkaloid Biosynthesis in Atropa belladonna. The Plant Cell. 2014;26:3745–3762. doi: 10.1105/tpc.114.130534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Kilpatrick K, Pajak A, Hagel JM, Sumarah MW, et al. Characterization of aromatic aminotransferases from Ephedra sinica Stapf. Amino Acids. 2016;48:1209–1220. doi: 10.1007/s00726-015-2156-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Xiao Y, Zhang L, Gao S, Saechao S, et al. The c4h, tat, hppr and hppd Genes Prompted Engineering of Rosmarinic Acid Biosynthetic Pathway in Salvia miltiorrhiza Hairy Root Cultures. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e29713. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Lu X, Hao L, Wang F, Huang C, et al. Molecular cloning and overexpression of the tyrosine aminotransferase (TAT) gene leads to increased rosmarinic acid yield in Perilla frutescens. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC) 2013;115:69–83. doi: 10.1007/s11240-013-0341-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Almeida J, Quadrana L, Asís R, Setta N, et al. Genetic dissection of vitamin E biosynthesis in tomato. J Exp bot. 2011;62:3781–3798. doi: 10.1093/jxb/err055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Grynkiewicz G, Gadzikowska M. Tropane alkaloids as medicinally useful natural products and their synthetic derivatives as new drugs. Pharmacol rep. 2008;60:439–463. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Mikkelsen MD, Naur P, Halkier BA. Arabidopsis mutants in the C–S lyase of glucosinolate biosynthesis establish a critical role for indole-3-acetaldoxime in auxin homeostasis. The Plant Journal. 2004;37:770–777. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02002.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Guzman L-M, Belin D, Carson MJ, Beckwith J. Tight regulation, modulation, and high-level expression by vectors containing the arabinose PBAD promoter. J Bacteriol. 1995;177:4121–4130. doi: 10.1128/jb.177.14.4121-4130.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.LeMaster DM, Richards FM. NMR sequential assignment of Escherichia coli thioredoxin utilizing random fractional deuteriation. Biochemistry. 1988;27:142–150. doi: 10.1021/bi00401a022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Scarpati ML, Oriente G. Isolamento e costituzione dell’acido rosmarinico (dal rosmarinus off.) Riserca Science. 1958;28:2329–2333. [Google Scholar]
- 60.Mehta, P. K., Hale, T. I. & Christen, P. Aminotransferases: demonstration of homology and division into evolutionary subgroups. European Journal of Biochemistry2 (1993). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 61.Mehta PK, Hale TI, Christen P. Evolutionary relationships among aminotransferases: Tyrosine aminotransferase, histidinol-phosphate aminotransferase, and aspartate aminotransferase are homologous proteins. European Journal of Biochemistry. 1989;189:249–253. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1989.tb15202.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Maeda H, Dudareva N. The Shikimate Pathway and Aromatic Amino Acid Biosynthesis in Plants. Annual Review of Plant Biology. 2012;63:73–105. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042811-105439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Weng J, Philippe R, Noel J. The rise of chemodiversity in plants. Science. 2012;336:1667–1670. doi: 10.1126/science.1217411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Sandorf I, Holländer-Czytko H. Jasmonate is involved in the induction of tyrosine aminotransferase and tocopherol biosynthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Planta. 2002;216:173–179. doi: 10.1007/s00425-002-0888-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Montemartini M, Búa J, Bontempi E, Zelada C, et al. A recombinant tyrosine aminotransferase from Trypanosoma cruzi has both tyrosine aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase activities. FEMS Microbiology Letters. 1995;133:17–20. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1995.tb07854.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Zhang Y, Yan Y-P, Wu Y-C, Hua W-P, et al. Pathway engineering for phenolic acid accumulations in Salvia miltiorrhiza by combinational genetic manipulation. Metabolic Engineering. 2014;21:71–80. doi: 10.1016/j.ymben.2013.10.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Ru, M., Wang, K., Bai, Z. & Peng, L. et al. Molecular cloning and characterisation of two enzymes involved in the rosmarinic acid biosynthesis pathway of Prunella vulgaris L. Plant Cell Tiss Org, 1–10, doi:10.1007/s11240-016-1117-z (2016).
- 68.Ru M, An YY, Wang KR, Peng L, et al. Prunella vulgaris L. hairy roots: Culture, growth, and elicitation by ethephon and salicylic acid. Eng life sci. 2016;16:494–502. doi: 10.1002/elsc.201600001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Wang X, Sun Y, Yang H, Lu Y, et al. Oxidized Low-Density Lipoprotein Induces Apoptosis in Cultured Neonatal Rat Cardiomyocytes by Modulating the TLR4/NF-κB Pathway. Sci Rep. 2016;6:27866. doi: 10.1038/srep27866. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Hernández A, Ruiz MT. An EXCEL template for calculation of enzyme kinetic parameters by non-linear regression. Bioinformatics. 1998;14:227–228. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/14.2.227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.