Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Genome Announcements logoLink to Genome Announcements
. 2017 Jul 6;5(27):e00397-17. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00397-17

Draft Genome Sequences of the Antarctic Endolithic Fungi Rachicladosporium antarcticum CCFEE 5527 and Rachicladosporium sp. CCFEE 5018

Claudia Coleine a,b, Sawyer Masonjones b, Laura Selbmann a, Laura Zucconi a, Silvano Onofri a, Claudia Pacelli a, Jason E Stajich b,✉
PMCID: PMC5502844  PMID: 28684563

ABSTRACT

The draft genome sequences of Rachicladosporium antarcticum CCFEE 5527 and Rachicladosporium sp. CCFEE 5018 are the first sequenced genomes from this genus, which comprises rock-inhabiting fungi. These endolithic strains were isolated from inside rocks collected from the Antarctic Peninsula and Battleship Promontory (McMurdo Dry Valleys), Antarctica, respectively.

GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

The past decade has revealed an unexpected fungal diversity associated with rocks, which serves as a primary substrate colonized by microorganisms in extreme dry and cold or hot environments. Under these harsh conditions, active growth is rare on exposed surfaces, and endolithism is a necessary ecological adaptation for survival (1). Black meristematic fungi are a morpho-ecological group of ascomycetes with a peculiar tendency to the extremes and are characterized by melanin pigmentation. They are typical and abundant members of Antarctic cryptoendolithic communities (2). These fungi are equally named black yeasts or microcolonial fungi and rock inhabitant fungi when found growing within rocks (3–7). We produced draft genome sequences of the Antarctic fungi Rachicladosporium antarcticum CCFEE 5527 Onofri & Egidi (2) and Rachicladosporium sp. strain CCFEE 5018 to provide genome resources to study fungal adaptation to extreme environments and endolithic lifestyles. These genomic resources may give clues for studying the evolution of extremophiles and stress adaptation in these enigmatic fungi.

Rachicladosporium strains were obtained from the Culture Collection of Fungi from Extreme Environments (Viterbo, Italy) and were cultured from inside Antarctic rocks. Species designation of Rachicladosporium sp. strain CCFEE 5018 is still being determined, and the internal transcribed spacer sequence is 98.6% identical to Rachicladosporium monterosium strain CBS 137178 Isola & Zucconi (2). Cultures were grown on 2% malt extract agar. DNA was extracted using a cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB)-based protocol (8). Two phenol-chloroform purification steps were used to eliminate melanin from the DNA. Total genomic DNA was sheared with a Covaris S220 ultrasonicator. Sequencing libraries were constructed using NeoPrep TruSeq Nano DNA sample prep (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA). Libraries were normalized, pooled, and sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq with 2 × 300 paired-end reads. R. antarcticum was sequenced to a depth of 41× and Rachicladosporium sp. CCFEE 5018 to 175× to improve assembly quality.

Genome assembly with MaSuRCA version 2.3.2 (9) was followed by vector sequence filtering with Sequin (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Sequin/). Redundant contigs which aligned by MUMMer (10) at 95% across their entire length were removed. The R. antarcticum genome assembly was 47.4 Mb (number of contigs, 267; N50, 896 kb; L50, 20). The initial Rachicladosporium sp. CCFEE 5018 assembly was fragmented (2,099 contigs) but was scaffolded by synteny to R. antarcticum with Satsuma2 (11) and Mercator (12) into 233 scaffolds (N50, 1.35 Mb; L50, 12). The genomes were annotated with Funannotate utilizing Augustus (13), GeneMark.hmm-ES (14), and EVM (15) and prepared for GenBank with Genome Annotation Generator (16). Gene function predictions were assigned by matches to the Pfam (17), MEROPS (18), CAZy (19), InterProScan (20), and Swiss-Prot databases (21). Product descriptions were transferred from homologs with 60% similar alignments across 60% of the protein length. A total of 18,781 protein-coding genes were predicted in R. antarcticum and 18,892 in Rachicladosporium sp. CCFEE 5018.

Accession number(s).

These whole-genome shotgun projects have been deposited at DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession numbers NAJO00000000 and NAEU00000000. The versions described in this paper are the first versions, NAJO01000000 and NAEU01000000.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank the Italian National Program for Antarctic Researches for funding sampling campaigns and research in the frame of project 2013/AZ-17. The Italian National Museum of Antarctica (MNA) is acknowledged for financial support to the Culture Collection of Fungi from Extreme Environments (CCFEE), the mycological section of the MNA, and for kindly providing the strains. This work was partially supported by the USDA Agriculture Experimental Station at the University of California, Riverside and NIFA Hatch project CA-R-PPA-5062-H to J.E.S., and high-performance computing resources in the Institute for Integrative Genome Biology (IIGB) at UC Riverside supported by grants NSF DBI-1429826 and NIH S10-OD016290.

Genome sequencing was performed in the Genomics Core Facility of the IIGB at University of California, Riverside.

Footnotes

Citation Coleine C, Masonjones S, Selbmann L, Zucconi L, Onofri S, Pacelli C, Stajich JE. 2017. Draft genome sequences of the Antarctic endolithic fungi Rachicladosporium antarcticum CCFEE 5527 and Rachicladosporium sp. CCFEE 5018. Genome Announc 5:e00397-17. https://doi.org/10.1128/genomeA.00397-17.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Zucconi L, Onofri S, Cecchini C, Isola D, Ripa C, Fenice M, Madonna S, Reboleiro-Rivas P, Selbmann L. 2016. Mapping the lithic colonization at the boundaries of life in northern Victoria Land, Antarctica. Polar Biol 39:91–102. doi: 10.1007/s00300-014-1624-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Egidi E, de Hoog GS, Isola D, Onofri S, Quaedvlieg W, de Vries M, Verkley GJM, Stielow JB, Zucconi L, Selbmann L. 2014. Phylogeny and taxonomy of meristematic rock-inhabiting black fungi in the Dothideomycetes based on multi-locus phylogenies. Fungal Divers 65:127–165. doi: 10.1007/s13225-013-0277-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sterflinger K. 1998. Temperature and NaCl-tolerance of rock-inhabiting meristematic fungi. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 74:271–281. doi: 10.1023/A:1001753131034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ruibal C, Gueidan C, Selbmann L, Gorbushina AA, Crous PW, Groenewald JZ, Muggia L, Grube M, Isola D, Schoch CL, Staley JT, Lutzoni F, de Hoog GS. 2009. Phylogeny of rock-inhabiting fungi related to Dothideomycetes. Stud Mycol 64:123–133S7 123–133S7. doi: 10.3114/sim.2009.64.06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Selbmann L, de Hoog GS, Zucconi L, Isola D, Ruisi S, van den Ende AHGG, Ruibal C, De Leo F, Urzì C, Onofri S. 2008. Drought meets acid: three new genera in a dothidealean clade of extremotolerant fungi. Stud Mycol 61:1–20. doi: 10.3114/sim.2008.61.01. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Selbmann L, de Hoog GS, Mazzaglia A, Friedmann EI, Onofri S. 2005. Fungi at the edge of life: cryptendolithic black fungi from Antarctic desert. Stud Mycol 51:1–32. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Selbmann L, de Hoog GS, Zucconi L, Isola D, Onofri S. 2014. Black yeasts in cold habitats, p 173–189. In Buzzini P, Margesin R (ed), Cold-adapted yeasts. Springer, Berlin, Germany. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Fulton TM, Chunwongse J, Tanksley SD. 1995. Microprep protocol for extraction of DNA from tomato and other herbaceous plants. Plant Mol Biol Rep 13:207–209. doi: 10.1007/BF02670897. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Zimin AV, Marçais G, Puiu D, Roberts M, Salzberg SL, Yorke JA. 2013. The MaSuRCA genome assembler. Bioinformatics 29:2669–2677. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kurtz S, Phillippy A, Delcher AL, Smoot M, Shumway M, Antonescu C, Salzberg SL. 2004. Versatile and open software for comparing large genomes. Genome Biol 5:R12. doi: 10.1186/gb-2004-5-2-r12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Grabherr MG, Russell P, Meyer M, Mauceli E, Alföldi J, Di Palma F, Lindblad-Toh K. 2010. Genome-wide synteny through highly sensitive sequence alignment: Satsuma. Bioinformatics 26:1145–1151. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Dewey CN. 2006. Whole-genome alignments and polytopes for comparative genomics. Ph.D. thesis University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Stanke M, Keller O, Gunduz I, Hayes A, Waack S, Morgenstern B. 2006. AUGUSTUS: ab initio prediction of alternative transcripts. Nucleic Acids Res 34:W435–W439. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkl200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ter-Hovhannisyan V, Lomsadze A, Chernoff YO, Borodovsky M. 2008. Gene prediction in novel fungal genomes using an ab initio algorithm with unsupervised training. Genome Res 18:1979–1990. doi: 10.1101/gr.081612.108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Haas BJ, Salzberg SL, Zhu W, Pertea M, Allen JE, Orvis J, White O, Buell CR, Wortman JR. 2008. Automated eukaryotic gene structure annotation using EVidenceModeler and the program to assemble spliced alignments. Genome Biol 9:R7. doi: 10.1186/gb-2008-9-1-r7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hall B, DeRego T, Geib S. 2014. GAG: the genome annotation generator. https://genomeannotation.github.io/GAG/. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 17.Finn RD, Bateman A, Clements J, Coggill P, Eberhardt RY, Eddy SR, Heger A, Hetherington K, Holm L, Mistry J, Sonnhammer ELL, Tate J, Punta M. 2014. Pfam: the protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res 42:D222–D230. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Rawlings ND, Barrett AJ, Bateman A. 2014. Using the MEROPS database for proteolytic enzymes and their inhibitors and substrates. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics 48:1.25.1–1.2533. doi: 10.1002/0471250953.bi0125s48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lombard V, Golaconda Ramulu H, Drula E, Coutinho PM, Henrissat B. 2014. The carbohydrate-active enzymes database (CAZy) in 2013. Nucleic Acids Res 42:D490–D495. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Jones P, Binns D, Chang HY, Fraser M, Li W, McAnulla C, McWilliam H, Maslen J, Mitchell A, Nuka G, Pesseat S, Quinn AF, Sangrador-Vegas A, Scheremetjew M, Yong SY, Lopez R, Hunter S. 2014. InterProScan 5: Genome-scale protein function classification. Bioinformatics 30:1236–1240. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Boutet E, Lieberherr D, Tognolli M, Schneider M, Bansal P, Bridge AJ, Poux S, Bougueleret L, Xenarios I. 2016. UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot, the manually annotated section of the UniProt KnowledgeBase: how to use the entry view. Methods Mol Biol 1374:23–54. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-3167-5_2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genome Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES