Skip to main content
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine logoLink to Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
letter
. 2017 Jun 30;5(6):2325967117710176. doi: 10.1177/2325967117710176

Biomechanical Comparison Between the Cruciate Suture and a Single Vertical Suture Used for Arthroscopic Meniscal Repair: Response

Charles Milchteim 1, Eric A Branch 1, Ty Maughon 1, Jay Hughey 1, Adam W Anz 1,
PMCID: PMC5502941  PMID: 28717671

Authors’ Response:

We appreciate the letter to the editor and agree with the comments. It is important to highlight that Abdelkafy and colleagues evaluated a cruciate pattern produced with a single suture1 while our study evaluated a cruciate pattern created by 2 meniscal repair suture devices,2 effectively producing a repair with 2 sutures. The difference of 1 suture versus 2 sutures is a probable explanation for the difference in conclusions reached between the 2 studies.

Charles Milchteim, MD
Eric A. Branch, MS
Ty Maughon
Jay Hughey, MD
Adam W. Anz, MD
Gulf Breeze, Florida, USA

Footnotes

The authors declared that they have no conflicts of interest in the authorship and publication of this contribution.

References

  • 1. Abdelkafy A, Wlk M, Krasny C, Landsiedl F. The “cruciate suture” for arthroscopic meniscal repair: a new technique. Arthroscopy. 2006;22:1134.e1–1134.e5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Milchteim C, Branch EA, Maughon T, Hughey J, Anz AW. Biomechanical comparison of parallel and crossed suture repair for longitudinal meniscus tears. Orthop J Sports Med. 2016;4(4):2325967116640263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES