Skip to main content
PMC home page
Oncotarget logoLink to Oncotarget
. 2017 Mar 3;8(24):38530–38540. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.15869

CYP genes in osteosarcoma: Their role in tumorigenesis, pulmonary metastatic microenvironment and treatment response

Alini Trujillo-Paolillo 1,2, Francine Tesser-Gamba 1, Antonio Sergio Petrilli 3, Maria Teresa de Seixas Alves 4, Reynaldo Jesus Garcia Filho 5, Renato de Oliveira 6, Silvia Regina Caminada de Toledo 1,2,7
PMCID: PMC5503551  PMID: 28404946

Abstract

Osteosarcoma (OS) is the most common malignant bone tumor in children and adolescents. The present study investigated the expression of Cytochrome P-450 (CYP) genes: CYP1A2, CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 by qRT-PCR in 135 specimens obtained from OS patients, including biopsy (pre-chemotherapy), tumor resected in surgery (post-chemotherapy), adjacent bone to tumor (nonmalignant tissue), pulmonary metastasis and adjacent lung to metastasis (nonmalignant tissue). Normal bone and normal lung tissues were used as control. We also investigated in five OS cell lines the modulation of CYPs expression by cisplatin, doxorubicin and methotrexate. As result, the adjacent lung specimens presented CYP1A2 overexpression compared to the normal lung (p=0.0256). Biopsy specimens presented lower CYP3A4 expression than normal bone (p=0.0314). The overexpression of both CYP1A2 and CYP3A4 in post-chemotherapy specimens were correlated with better event free-survival (p=0.0244) and good response (p=0.0484), respectively. Furthermore, in vitro assays revealed that CYP1A2 was upregulated by doxorubicin (p=0.0034); CYP3A4 was upregulated by cisplatin, doxorubicin and methotrexate (p=0.0004, p=0.0024, p<0.0001, respectively); and CYP3A5 was downregulated by doxorubicin (p=0.0285) and upregulated in time-dependent manner by methotrexate (p=0.0239). In conclusion, our findings suggest that CYP genes play an important role in OS tumorigenesis, at primary and metastatic sites, as well in treatment response.

Keywords: osteosarcoma, cytochrome P-450, osteosarcoma cell line, tumor microenvironment, treatment response

INTRODUCTION

Osteosarcoma (OS) originates from primitive mesenchymal cells and it is the most common malignant bone tumor in children and adolescents [1]. OS treatment still uses the same drugs since 1980s and survival rates have not been improved since then, consequently translational research is required to identify targets for novel treatment modalities [2]. Cytochrome P-450 (CYP) enzymes participate in the phase I of drug metabolism, mediating drug oxidation, reduction and hydrolysis reactions, therefore activating or deactivating drugs during these processes [3, 4]. The CYP enzymes also mediate metabolic activation of procarcinogens, thus they could play a role in both tumorigenesis and treatment response [4].

Although many CYP members detoxify anticancer drugs used in OS treatment, such as ifosfamide, doxorubicin, etoposide and cisplatin [5, 6], the impact of CYP to treatment response and prognosis in OS needs to be further explored and defined [5]. Dhaini et al. found a higher frequency of CYP1A2 expression detection in OS biopsy fragments than in most cancers investigated (80%) [7]. CYP1A2 gene expression has already been detected in human lung tissue [8], the main metastatic site in OS. In OS patients, the variant rs4646437 in CYP3A4 gene has been associated with 5-year progression-free survival [9]. Mensah-Osman et al. verified that Pregnane Xenobiotic Receptor (PXR) plays a critical role in CYP3A4 gene expression regulation in OS and its activation may influence the chemotherapy effect in target genes implicating drug resistance [10]. In addition, analyses of CYP3A4/5 expression in OS biopsies revealed that high expression might predict metastasis and poor prognosis in OS [7].

The CYP enzymes are involved in the biosynthesis or catabolism of steroid hormones, bile acids, fat-soluble vitamins, fatty acids, and eicosanoids, which play a role in important pathways [11]. The CYP1A2 enzyme can convert several procarcinogens, including polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), heterocyclic amines, and aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) to reactive electrophiles that can interact with DNA and proteins [12]. Thus, differences in CYP1A2 activity may influence individual susceptibility to cancer risk [4]. Polymorphisms in the CYP1A2 gene have already been related with cancer risk in liver, lung, stomach, pancreas, breast, endometrium and ovarian [13–19]. As for drugs, CYP3A enzyme also plays an important role in the metabolism of several endogenous substances, including testosterone and progesterone [20]. Polymorphism in CYP3A4 gene was associated with early puberty [21] and has been associated with a high grade and advanced stage of prostate cancers [22]. Furthermore, a meta-analysis showed that polymorphism in CYP3A5 gene may increase the cancer risk, especially in acute leukemia, chronic leukemia, and colorectal cancer [23]. The major sources of variability in CYP activities are environmental influences, including inhibition or induction by drugs; biological factors including sex and physiological determinants, such as hormonal status, disease, and circadian rhythms; and genetic polymorphisms in both CYP genes and their regulators [20].

Therefore, the aim of the present study was to investigate if the expression levels of CYP1A2, CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 genes play a role in OS tumorigenesis and treatment response. Thus, we analyzed different specimens in time for each OS patient during the treatment and disease progression. As well, we investigated nonmalignant tissues surrounding the tumor, such as bone and lung tissues that could play an important role in priming the microenvironment for OS establishment. This study also investigated if the major drugs used in OS treatment and their different combinations could modulate CYP genes expression in OS cell lines.

RESULTS

Gene expression of CYP1A2, CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 in OS patients and controls

CYP1A2 gene expression and its association with pulmonary microenvironment in OS metastasis could be observed in Figure 1. The adjacent lung to pulmonary OS metastasis specimens presented CYP1A2 overexpression compared to normal lung (p=0.0256), adjacent bone (p<0.0001) and normal bone (p=0.0015) specimens (Figure 1A). The CYP1A2 gene overexpression observed in adjacent lung to OS metastasis specimens was exclusive for this CYP gene among the others investigated, as CYP3A4 (p<0.0001) and CYP3A5 (p=0.0168).

Figure 1. CYP1A2 expression and its correlation with OS metastasis and metastatic tumor microenvironment.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

A. Kruskal-Wallis Test (p<0.0001). Analyses between two groups were done by Mann-Whitney Test that confirmed CYP1A2 overexpression in adjacent lung to OS metastasis in comparison with normal bone (control of the bone tissue) (p=0.0015), adjacent bone to primary OS (p<0.0001) and normal lung (control of the lung tissue) (p=0.0256). B. Friedman Test (p<0.0001). Dunn's multiple comparisons test confirmed CYP1A2 overexpression in comparison with CYP3A4 (p<0.0001) and CYP3A5 (p=0.0168) in adjacent lung to OS metastasis. C. Kruskal-Wallis Test. CYP1A2 overexpression in M-OS cell line, established from OS metastasis in the lung (p=0.0464). Statistical significance: *: p<0.05; **: p<0.01; ***: p<0.001; ****: p<0.0001.

It was also observed a difference in CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 gene expression in analyzed specimens (Figure 2A and 2B, respectively). Biopsy specimens presented lower CYP3A4 expression than normal bone specimens (p=0.0314). Surgery specimens presented CYP3A4 overexpression than biopsy (p<0.0001) and first occurred metastasis specimens from each patient (p=0.0006). In CYP3A5 gene expression analyses, surgery specimens presented higher expression than biopsy specimens (p=0.0157) and lower expression than metastasis at diagnosis specimens (p=0.0066).

Figure 2. CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 genes expression in OS specimens and normal bone.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

A. CYP3A4 gene expression. Biopsy presented lower expression than normal bone specimens. Surgery specimens presented higher expression than biopsy. First metastasis from each patient presented lower expression than surgery and normal bone specimens, presenting similar expression to biopsy. B. CYP3A5 gene expression. Surgery specimens presented overexpression than biopsy and lower expression than metastasis at diagnosis specimens. Statistical significance by Mann-Whitney and Wilcoxon Test: *: p<0.05; **: p<0.01; ***: p<0.001; ****: p<0.0001.

Furthermore, CYPs gene expression showed to be associated with the outcome of OS patients (Figure 3). The survival curves of OS patients were analyzed according high expression (more or equal than median value) and low expression (less than median value) of CYP genes. In this analysis, we have separated two independent groups of patients: metastatic and nonmetastatic at diagnosis, since metastasis at diagnosis is an important prognostic factor in OS. When only nonmetastatic patients at diagnosis were analyzed, the CYP1A2 overexpression in surgery specimens was associated with a better event-free survival (p=0.0244) (Figure 3A). Also, CYP3A4 overexpression in adjacent bone specimens was associated with good response (tumor necrosis grade higher than 90% - grades III and IV) (p=0.0484) and conservative surgery (p=0.0329) (Figure 3B and 3C, respectively).

Figure 3. CYPs gene expression and outcome in OS.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

A. Event-free survival of nonmetastatic at diagnosis patients according to high expression (more or equal than median value) and low expression (less than median value) of CYP1A2 gene. The median value of CYP1A2 relative quantification was 0.3797 in surgery specimens. B. Mann-Whitney Test. CYP3A4 expression in adjacent bone specimens (post-chemotherapy), according tumor necrosis grade. C. Mann-Whitney Test. CYP3A4 expression in adjacent bone specimens (post-chemotherapy), according to type of surgery.

Gene expression of CYP1A2, CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 in OS cell lines untreated and treated with chemotherapeutic drugs

Although all OS cell lines have been treated with IC50, some samples did not show a good quality of RNA, probably due to drugs effects, thus they were excluded from analyses. The present investigation showed that the M-OS cell line untreated presented CYP1A2 overexpression than other OS cell lines (p=0.0464) (Figure 1C). Analyses of CYP genes expression in OS cell lines untreated (control) and treated with cisplatin, doxorubicin, methotrexate, cisplatin plus doxorubicin (CD), cisplatin plus doxorubicin plus methotrexate (CDM) were showed in Figure 4. The doxorubicin, CD and CDM treatments upregulated the CYP1A2 expression in OS cell lines (p=0.0034, p=0.0068 and p=0.0020, respectively) (Figure 4A). All the five treatments (cisplatin, doxorubicin, methotrexate, CD and CDM) upregulated the CYP3A4 expression in OS cell lines (p=0.0004, p= 0.0024, p<0.0001, p=0.0472 and p=0.0362, respectively) (Figure 4B). The CYP3A5 expression in OS cell lines was downregulated after treatments with doxorubicin, CD and CDM (p=0.0285, p=0.0463 and p=0.0108, respectively) (Figure 4C). Additionally, treatment with methotrexate showed an increased expression of CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 genes in a time-dependent manner (p=0.0085 and p=0.0239, respectively) (Figure 4B and 4C), in which 72 hours of treatment resulted in higher gene expression than 24 hours of treatment.

Figure 4. CYPs gene expression in OS cell lines treated with cisplatin, doxorubicin, methotrexate, cisplatin plus doxorubicin (CD), and cisplatin plus doxorubicin plus methotrexate (CDM).

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

A. CYP1A2 upregulation by doxorubicin, CD and CDM treatments. B. CYP3A4 upregulation by cisplatin, doxorubicin, methotrexate, CD and CDM treatments, whereas upregulation by methotrexate was time-dependent. C. CYP3A5 downregulation by doxorubicin, CD and CDM treatments, whereas methotrexate upregulated in a time-dependent manner. Statistical significance by Mann-Whitney and Wilcoxon: *: p<0.05; **: p<0.01; ***: p<0.001; ****: p<0.0001.

DISCUSSION

The CYP enzymes are involved in the biosynthesis or catabolism of several endogenous compounds involved in a variety of important pathways [11]. Furthermore, CYP members can detoxify anticancer drugs used in OS treatment, such as doxorubicin and cisplatin [5]. Thus, CYP members could play a role in both tumorigenesis and treatment response [4]. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that investigated CYP gene expression in primary and metastatic OS, as well as in nonmalignant tissue surrounding the tumor, in order to investigate CYP role in priming tumor microenvironment and tumorigenesis in OS. Also, for the first time CYP gene expression was correlated with the outcome in OS and the modulation of its expression was investigated in vitro by the main chemotherapeutic drugs used in OS treatment.

The present study revealed that adjacent lung specimens presented CYP1A2 overexpression, but not CYP3A4 and CYP3A5, when compared to normal lung specimens. It was also observed that biopsy specimens presented lower CYP3A4 gene expression than normal bone specimens. Surgery specimens, representing post-chemotherapy tumors, showed both CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 overexpression. Metastasis specimens presented lower CYP3A4 expression, but higher CYP3A5 expression, than surgery specimens. The current analysis showed that surgery specimens with CYP1A2 overexpression are associated with a better event-free survival in nonmetastatic patients at diagnosis. Furthermore, adjacent bone specimens showed CYP3A4 gene overexpression in patients that presented good response or were submitted to conservative surgery. In vitro assays showed that CYP1A2 expression was upregulated by doxorubicin; CYP3A4 expression was upregulated by cisplatin, doxorubicin and methotrexate; and CYP3A5 expression was downregulated by doxorubicin and upregulated in a time-dependent manner by methotrexate.

The CYP1A2 overexpression exclusively in the adjacent lung tissue showed that this CYP member might contribute to a favorable microenvironment in the lung during OS metastasis establishment. Interestingly, the M-OS cell line, established from pulmonary OS metastasis, also showed CYP1A2 overexpression, which emphasizes a possible correlation between CYP1A2 and pulmonary OS metastasis. Polymorphisms in the CYP1A2 gene have already been correlated with cancer risk in liver, lung, stomach, pancreas, breast, endometrium and ovarian [13–19]. Several meta-analyses showed that the polymorphism 164A>C in CYP1A2 gene can result in 2–3 fold increase in the CYP1A2 activity, which has been associated with increased cancer risk, primarily lung cancer in Caucasians [24–27]. Interestingly, 82% of the adjacent lung specimens analyzed in the present study were obtained from Caucasians.

The CYP1A2 enzyme could contribute to an ideal microenvironment in the lung through several ways. First, benzo[a]pyrene, a CYP1 enzyme substrate and a PAH present in organic material combustion, such as, diesel and food, has implicated in the induction of cell proliferation as well as tumors including OS [28]. Moreover, CYP1 metabolism of both xenobiotics and endobiotics leads to reactive oxygen species (ROS) formation, which can cause genotoxicity, and lead to inflammation, another source of ROS formation [29]. Furthermore, a regulatory feedback loop between AHR (aryl hydrocarbon receptor) and CYP1 genes is known, thus AhR interacts with nuclear factor κb (NFκB), estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1) and retinoblastoma 1 (RB1), which triggers the transcription of genes involved in growth, cell cycle and apoptosis, leading to abnormal growth and tumor promotion [29]. For example, the AHR/RB1 complex, could cause RB1 hyperphosphorylation and cell cycle progression [30]. Also, it is already known a strong correlation between RB1 mutations and OS tumorigenesis [31, 32], showing that AHR/CYP1 modulation could influence OS tumorigenesis and maintenance.

The low CYP3A4 expression in the biopsy suggested its role in OS tumorigenesis. The CYP3A4 enzyme has the highest abundance in the human liver (~40%) [33] and is involved in the oxidative deactivation of testosterone [34, 35]. Testosterone plays a crucial role in bone metabolism and pubertal growth spurt [36], and it could be mediated by activation via Akt (serine/threonine kinase) and MAPK (mitogen-activated protein kinase) [37]. In this sense, MAPK7 has already been studied in OS and might be a promising therapeutic target for this tumor, since modulates growth, proliferation and migration in OS [38].

As we observed increase of the CYP3A4 expression in surgery specimens, we propose that it might have occurred due to chemotherapy treatment. However, metastasis specimens showed lower CYP3A4 expression than surgery and normal bone specimens, demonstrating a similar pattern observed in biopsy specimens. On the other hand, the upregulation of CYP3A5 expression not only occurred when surgery and biopsy specimens were compared, but also when metastasis specimens were compared with normal bone, biopsy and surgery specimens. Although the transcriptional regulation of CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 genes are done by the same receptor, PXR [39], the present study showed a similar CYP3A4 expression in biopsy and metastasis specimens, which could be related to some resistance mechanism.

Our findings as to CYP overexpression and good outcome in OS patients are in agreement with other CYP studies of drug toxicity [29]. The correlation between CYP1A2 overexpression and better event-free survival, probably is due to doxorubicin toxicity mediated by CYP1A2 enzyme against OS cancer cells, since CYP1A2 metabolizes this chemotherapy drug [40]. The association between CYP3A4 overexpression and good response objected to what has been found by Dhaini et al., which showed that high CYP3A4/5 expression may predict metastasis and poor prognosis in OS [7]. The contrast could be explained by differences in analyzed samples. The present study showed an association with post-chemotherapy specimens, while Dhaini et al. investigated only pre-chemotherapy samples. Moreover, the present results regarding patients' specimens and in vitro assays, demonstrated that chemotherapy upregulates CYP3A4, which enzyme participates in cisplatin and doxorubicin metabolism [5].

In vitro assays showed that treatments with doxorubicin, CD or CDM upregulated CYP1A2 expression in OS cell lines. In H9c2 cell lines, derived from heart, there was already reported a significant induction of CYP1A2 expression by doxorubicin, as well as in breast cancer MCF7 cell line doxorubicin-resistant [40, 41]. These findings could be explained by AhR protein induction by doxorubicin, once CYP1A2 gene is coordinately regulated at the transcriptional level by AhR protein [42]. Regarding CYP3A4 expression, it was observed upregulation in OS cell lines by all five treatments. Moreover, cell lines treated with methotrexate showed CYP3A4 upregulation time-dependent, whereas the treatment for 72 hours presented higher expression than 24 hours. This regulation could be mediated by PXR, which is the major responsible for CYP3A4 gene transcription [10, 12] and has already known to be expressed in OS cell lines, such as HOS, MG-63, and Saos-2 [43].

Although the transcriptional regulation of CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 genes are performed by the same receptor, PXR [39], our findings in vitro showed that CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 genes were differently regulated by chemotherapy. Treatment with doxorubicin, CD and CDM in OS cell lines, different of CYP3A4, downregulated CYP3A5 expression. However, it was observed CYP3A5 overexpression in post-chemotherapy OS specimens. We suggest that methotrexate upregulated CYP3A5 expression in patients' specimens, due to in vitro assays have shown CYP3A5 overexpression in 72 hours of methotrexate treatment than in 24 hours. Therefore, a longer time of methotrexate treatment could increase even more CYP3A5 expression. Thus, CYP3A5 gene upregulation by methotrexate could prevail over downregulation by doxorubicin, since methotrexate is administrated in patients twice per cycle of chemotherapy and doxorubicin is administrated only once per cycle.

The CYP enzymes played controversial roles during time. In the pre-1968 era, CYP enzymes were thought to be beneficial because of detoxification, in the 1968–1998 era everyone was convinced that CYP enzymes were always detrimental, and since 1998 it seems more protective than destructive during environmental injury [29]. So, these controversial opinions probably were due to its great importance in several metabolism and molecular pathways. Thus, the present study showed that CYPs gene expression could play a role in different ways, depending if their influence was considered in tumorigenesis or treatment response. Due to that, CYP genes should be more explored in OS, a complex disease, to clarify these correlations.

In conclusion, the present study showed that adjacent lung to OS metastasis presented CYP1A2 overexpression, indicating its role in priming a favorable microenvironment during the establishment of OS lung metastasis. Moreover, biopsy specimens presented lower CYP3A4 expression than normal bone, which suggests a possible correlation between CYP3A4 and OS tumorigenesis. The CYP1A2 and CYP3A4 overexpression post-chemotherapy were correlated with a better event free-survival and a better treatment response, respectively, probably due to the role of CYP1A2 and CYP3A4 enzymes in chemotherapy drugs metabolism. Additionally, in OS cell lines was verified that the own drugs used in OS treatment modulated CYPs gene expression. Therefore, the present study suggests that CYP genes play an important role in OS tumorigenesis, at primary and metastatic sites, as well in treatment response.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients and specimens

We investigated 135 specimens from 37 patients with the diagnosis of OS admitted to treatment in the Pediatric Oncology Institute (IOP/GRAACC/UNIFESP), between 2006 and 2011, with an average of 16 years of age at diagnosis. Thus, the study included 37 biopsies (pre-chemotherapy), 37 OS resected in surgery (post-chemotherapy), 37 nonmalignant bone tissues surrounding OS resected in surgery (adjacent bone - post-chemotherapy), 13 lung metastases and 11 nonmalignant lung tissues surrounding OS metastases (adjacent lung). Lung metastasis and adjacent lung specimens were obtained from eight patients, in which four were metastatic patients at diagnosis. Four normal bone tissues were used as control, they were obtained from orthopedic surgeries of four healthy individuals that suffered a trauma and did not present either genetic disorders or bone diseases. Two different samples were used as control for the nonmalignant lung tissues surrounding metastases: one normal lung from a healthy individual without genetic disorders and one human lung total RNA from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA). This study had the Research Ethics Committee approval from the Federal University of Sao Paulo (CEP UNIFESP 833694) and all patients agreed to participate by an informed consent. All patients were treated following the GLATO (Grupo Latino Americano de Tratamento de Osteossarcoma - Latin American Group of Osteosarcoma Treatment) protocol of 2006, which is based on high doses of cisplatin, doxorubicin and methotrexate. All clinical data are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1. Clinical features of OS patients.

Clinical features No. (%)
Metastasis at diagnosis
 Yes 6 (16)
 No 31 (84)
Location
 Femur 22 (59)
 Tibia 8 (22)
 Humerus 3 (8)
 Others 4 (11)
Size
 < 12 cm 26 (70)
 ≥ 12 cm 11 (30)
Histology
 Osteoblastic 18 (49)
 Condroblastic 4 (11)
 Fibroblastic 3 (8)
 Mixed 7 (19)
 Others 5 (13)
Grade of tumor necrosis
 < 90% 18 (49)
 ≥ 90% 17 (46)
 Not identified 2 (5)
Surgery
 Conservative 32 (87)
 Amputation 5 (13)
Relapse
 Yes 10 (27)
 No 27 (73)
Local of relapse
 Lung 7 (19)
 Bone 4 (11)
Metastasis
 Yes 11 (30)
 No 26 (70)
Local of metastasis
 Lung 10 (27)
 Bone 3 (8)
Status
 Alive 29 (78)
 Dead 8 (22)
Open in a new tab

Cell lines

The human OS cell lines Saos-2, KHOS, MG-63, and U2-OS were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (Rockville, MD, USA). The human cell line M-OS was established in our laboratory from a OS lung metastasis at diagnosis [44]. All cell lines were cultured in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). All cells were cultured in a humidified incubator at 37°C and 5% CO2.

Cytotoxicity assay and IC50

The half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) of each drug (cisplatin, doxorubicin and methotrexate) and their combinations were determined by the cytotoxicity assay. It was considered two combinations used during OS treatment: 1) cisplatin and doxorubicin (CD), combination used in the first chemotherapy of each cycle; 2) cisplatin, doxorubicin and methotrexate (CDM), considering together all drugs used in this treatment.

The cells were plated in a 96-wells plates with 100 μl/well and 5×103 cells/well, except Saos-2 (1×104 cells/well) and performed in triplicate for all cell lines. After overnight incubation to adhesion of cells, the medium was removed and drugs were added in serial concentrations (0.39–200 μg/ml). Untreated cells were used as control. After 24, 48, and 72h of incubation, the medium with drugs was removed and each well was washed with 200 μl of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Then, 100 μl of PrestoBlue® Cell Viability Reagent (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA) dissolved in DMEM was added in each well. After 2h of incubation, all plates were analyzed on the ELISA reader M3 Spectra Max (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). The IC50 values were calculated for every treatment and time.

qRT-PCR

All frozen tissues were submitted to RNA extraction using TRIzol® Reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). All treated and untreated OS cell lines were submitted to RNA extraction using NucleoSpin Triprep® Kit (Macherey-Nagel, Duren, Germany). The cDNA was synthesized using SuperScript® Vilo™ Master Mix (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA). The gene expression was measured by quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) using SYBR® Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems™, Waltham, MA, USA). The ACTB and GAPDH genes were used as endogenous controls. Normal bone and normal lung were used as calibrators. All primers were designed using online tools (Clustal and NCBI primer express) and their sequences were: ACTB forward 5′-AAGGCCAACCGCGAGAAG-3′, reverse 5′-ACAGCCTGGATAGCAACGTACA-3′; GAPDH forward 5′-ACAACTTTGGTATCGTGGAAGGA-3′, reverse 5′-TCTTCTGGGTGGCAGTGATG-3′; CYP1A2 forward 5′-GCCTGAGATACAGAGGAAGATCCA-3′, reverse 5′-CGCTCCCTGCCAATCACA-3′; CYP3A4 forward 5′-TATGCTCTTCACCGTGACCCAA-3′, reverse 5′-CCTTGTTCTTCTTGCTGAAT-3′; and CYP3A5 forward 5′-CCTCTGCCTTTGTTGGGAAATG-3′, reverse 5′- GCACTCTGTGTCAAATTTCCAGAG-3′. The relative quantification (RQ) was calculated by the 2−ΔΔCt method.

Statistical analyses

Data analyses was performed using the GraphPad Prism version 6.0 for Windows (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). IC50 values were calculated by the software. The gene expression, which is represented by the relative quantification, was compared using nonparametric tests: Wilcoxon, Mann-Whitney, Friedman, Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn's multiple comparisons. The overall and event-free survivals were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method and the survival curves were compared by the log-rank test. Statistical significance was taken when P<0.05.

Acknowledgments

We are thankful to Dr. Janete Cerutti and Dr. Sérgio Schenkman. This study was supported by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP 2013/19166-6) and Grupo de Apoio ao Adolescente e à Criança com Câncer (GRAACC/UNIFESP).

Footnotes

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest in this study.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Meyers PA, Gorlick R. Osteosarcoma. Pediatric clinics of North America. 1997;44:973–989. doi: 10.1016/s0031-3955(05)70540-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ritter J, Bielack SS. Osteosarcoma. Annals of oncology. 2010;21:vii320–325. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdq276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Deenen MJ, Cats A, Beijnen JH, Schellens JH. Part 2: pharmacogenetic variability in drug transport and phase I anticancer drug metabolism. The oncologist. 2011;16:820–834. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2010-0259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Rodriguez-Antona C, Ingelman-Sundberg M. Cytochrome P450 pharmacogenetics and cancer. Oncogene. 2006;25:1679–1691. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hattinger CM, Serra M. Role of pharmacogenetics of drug-metabolizing enzymes in treating osteosarcoma. Expert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology. 2015;11:1449–1463. doi: 10.1517/17425255.2015.1060220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Murray GI, Shaw D, Weaver RJ, McKay JA, Ewen SW, Melvin WT, Burke MD. Cytochrome P450 expression in oesophageal cancer. Gut. 1994;35:599–603. doi: 10.1136/gut.35.5.599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Dhaini HR, Thomas DG, Giordano TJ, Johnson TD, Biermann JS, Leu K, Hollenberg PF, Baker LH. Cytochrome P450 CYP3A4/5 expression as a biomarker of outcome in osteosarcoma. Journal of clinical oncology. 2003;21:2481–2485. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.06.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wei C, Cacavale RJ, Kehoe JJ, Thomas PE, Iba MM. CYP1A2 is expressed along with CYP1A1 in the human lung. Cancer letters. 2001;164:25–32. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3835(00)00712-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hagleitner MM, Coenen MJ, Gelderblom H, Makkinje RR, Vos HI, de Bont ES, van der Graaf WT, Schreuder HW, Flucke U, van Leeuwen FN, Hoogerbrugge PM, Guchelaar HJ, te Loo DM. A First Step toward Personalized Medicine in Osteosarcoma: Pharmacogenetics as Predictive Marker of Outcome after Chemotherapy-Based Treatment. Clinical cancer research. 2015;21:3436–3441. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-2638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mensah-Osman EJ, Thomas DG, Tabb MM, Larios JM, Hughes DP, Giordano TJ, Lizyness ML, Rae JM, Blumberg B, Hollenberg PF, Baker LH. Expression levels and activation of a PXR variant are directly related to drug resistance in osteosarcoma cell lines. Cancer. 2007;109:957–965. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Rooseboom M, Commandeur JN, Vermeulen NP. Enzyme-catalyzed activation of anticancer prodrugs. Pharmacological reviews. 2004;56:53–102. doi: 10.1124/pr.56.1.3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Zhou SF, Liu JP, Chowbay B. Polymorphism of human cytochrome P450 enzymes and its clinical impact. Drug metabolism reviews. 2009;41:89–295. doi: 10.1080/03602530902843483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Agudo A, Sala N, Pera G, Capella G, Berenguer A, Garcia N, Palli D, Boeing H, Del Giudice G, Saieva C, Carneiro F, Berrino F, Sacerdote C, et al. Polymorphisms in metabolic genes related to tobacco smoke and the risk of gastric cancer in the European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition. Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention. 2006;15:2427–2434. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Chen X, Wang H, Xie W, Liang R, Wei Z, Zhi L, Zhang X, Hao B, Zhong S, Zhou G, Zhang L, Gao X, Zhu Y, He F. Association of CYP1A2 genetic polymorphisms with hepatocellular carcinoma susceptibility: a case-control study in a high-risk region of China. Pharmacogenetics and genomics. 2006;16:219–227. doi: 10.1097/01.fpc.0000194424.20393.c6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Le Marchand L, Donlon T, Kolonel LN, Henderson BE, Wilkens LR. Estrogen metabolism-related genes and breast cancer risk: the multiethnic cohort study. Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention. 2005;14:1998–2003. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Li D, Jiao L, Li Y, Doll MA, Hein DW, Bondy ML, Evans DB, Wolff RA, Lenzi R, Pisters PW, Abbruzzese JL, Hassan MM. Polymorphisms of cytochrome P4501A2 and N-acetyltransferase genes, smoking, and risk of pancreatic cancer. Carcinogenesis. 2006;27:103–111. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgi171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Osawa Y, Osawa KK, Miyaishi A, Higuchi M, Tsutou A, Matsumura S, Tabuchi Y, Tsubota N, Takahashi J. NAT2 and CYP1A2 polymorphisms and lung cancer risk in relation to smoking status. Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention. 2007;8:103–108. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Pavanello S, B'Chir F, Pulliero A, Saguem S, Ben Fraj R, El Aziz Hayouni A, Clonfero E, Mastrangelo G. Interaction between CYP1A2-T2467DELT polymorphism and smoking in adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the lung. Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) 2007;57:266–272. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2007.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Mikhailova ON, Gulyaeva LF, Prudnikov AV, Gerasimov AV, Krasilnikov SE. Estrogen-metabolizing gene polymorphisms in the assessment of female hormone-dependent cancer risk. The pharmacogenomics journal. 2006;6:189–193. doi: 10.1038/sj.tpj.6500365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Zanger UM, Turpeinen M, Klein K, Schwab M. Functional pharmacogenetics/genomics of human cytochromes P450 involved in drug biotransformation. Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry. 2008;392:1093–1108. doi: 10.1007/s00216-008-2291-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kadlubar FF, Berkowitz GS, Delongchamp RR, Wang C, Green BL, Tang G, Lamba J, Schuetz E, Wolff MS. The CYP3A4*1B variant is related to the onset of puberty, a known risk factor for the development of breast cancer. Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention. 2003;12:327–331. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Zeigler-Johnson CM, Walker AH, Mancke B, Spangler E, Jalloh M, McBride S, Deitz A, Malkowicz SB, Ofori-Adjei D, Gueye SM, Rebbeck TR. Ethnic differences in the frequency of prostate cancer susceptibility alleles at SRD5A2 and CYP3A4. Human heredity. 2002;54:13–21. doi: 10.1159/000066695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wang BS, Liu Z, Xu WX, Sun SL. CYP3A5*3 polymorphism and cancer risk: a meta-analysis and meta-regression. Tumour biology. 2013;34:2357–2366. doi: 10.1007/s13277-013-0783-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Sun WX, Chen YH, Liu ZZ, Xie JJ, Wang W, Du YP, Chen Y, Shen XL, He XF, Wu LX, Wei W, Zhang L. Association between the CYP1A2 polymorphisms and risk of cancer: a meta-analysis. Molecular genetics and genomics. 2015;290:709–725. doi: 10.1007/s00438-014-0956-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Bu ZB, Ye M, Cheng Y, Wu WZ. Four polymorphisms in the cytochrome P450 1A2 (CYP1A2) gene and lung cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention. 2014;15:5673–5679. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.14.5673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ma Z, Guo W, Gong T, Niu HJ, Wang RW, Jiang YG. CYP1A2 rs762551 polymorphism contributes to risk of lung cancer: a meta-analysis. Tumour biology. 2014;35:2253–2257. doi: 10.1007/s13277-013-1298-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Wang H, Zhang Z, Han S, Lu Y, Feng F, Yuan J. CYP1A2 rs762551 polymorphism contributes to cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis from 19 case-control studies. BMC cancer. 2012;12:528. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Tsai KS, Yang RS, Liu SH. Benzo[a]pyrene regulates osteoblast proliferation through an estrogen receptor-related cyclooxygenase-2 pathway. Chemical research in toxicology. 2004;17:679–684. doi: 10.1021/tx0499517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Nebert DW, Dalton TP. The role of cytochrome P450 enzymes in endogenous signalling pathways and environmental carcinogenesis. Nature reviews Cancer. 2006;6:947–960. doi: 10.1038/nrc2015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Barhoover MA, Hall JM, Greenlee WF, Thomas RS. Aryl hydrocarbon receptor regulates cell cycle progression in human breast cancer cells via a functional interaction with cyclin-dependent kinase 4. Molecular pharmacology. 2010;77:195–201. doi: 10.1124/mol.109.059675. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Yang J, Zhang W. New molecular insights into osteosarcoma targeted therapy. Current opinion in oncology. 2013;25:398–406. doi: 10.1097/CCO.0b013e3283622c1b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Zhou W, Hao M, Du X, Chen K, Wang G, Yang J. Advances in targeted therapy for osteosarcoma. Discovery medicine. 2014;17:301–307. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Zhou SF. Drugs behave as substrates, inhibitors and inducers of human cytochrome P450 3A4. Current drug metabolism. 2008;9:310–322. doi: 10.2174/138920008784220664. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Henderson BE, Feigelson HS. Hormonal carcinogenesis. Carcinogenesis. 2000;21:427–433. doi: 10.1093/carcin/21.3.427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ross RK, Coetzee GA, Pearce CL, Reichardt JK, Bretsky P, Kolonel LN, Henderson BE, Lander E, Altshuler D, Daley G. Androgen metabolism and prostate cancer: establishing a model of genetic susceptibility. European urology. 1999;35:355–361. doi: 10.1159/000019909. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Delemarre-van de Waal HA, van Coeverden SC, Rotteveel J. Hormonal determinants of pubertal growth. Journal of pediatric endocrinology & metabolism: JPEM. 2001;14:1521–1526. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Ray R, Novotny NM, Crisostomo PR, Lahm T, Abarbanell A, Meldrum DR. Sex steroids and stem cell function. Molecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass) 2008;14:493–501. doi: 10.2119/2008-00004.Ray. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Tesser-Gamba F, Lopes LJ, Petrilli AS, Toledo SR. MAPK7 gene controls proliferation, migration and cell invasion in osteosarcoma. Molecular carcinogenesis. 2015 doi: 10.1002/mc.22420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.de Wildt SN, Kearns GL, Leeder JS, van den Anker JN. Cytochrome P450 3A: ontogeny and drug disposition. Clinical pharmacokinetics. 1999;37:485–505. doi: 10.2165/00003088-199937060-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Zordoky BN, El-Kadi AO. Induction of several cytochrome P450 genes by doxorubicin in H9c2 cells. Vascular pharmacology. 2008;49:166–172. doi: 10.1016/j.vph.2008.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.AbuHammad S, Zihlif M. Gene expression alterations in doxorubicin resistant MCF7 breast cancer cell line. Genomics. 2013;101:213–220. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2012.11.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Volkova M, Palmeri M, Russell KS, Russell RR. Activation of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor by doxorubicin mediates cytoprotective effects in the heart. Cardiovascular research. 2011;90:305–314. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvr007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Tabb MM, Sun A, Zhou C, Grun F, Errandi J, Romero K, Pham H, Inoue S, Mallick S, Lin M, Forman BM, Blumberg B. Vitamin K2 regulation of bone homeostasis is mediated by the steroid and xenobiotic receptor SXR. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2003;278:43919–43927. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M303136200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Salinas-Souza C, Oliveira ID, de Oliveira R, de Seixas Alves MT, Petrilli AS, Toledo SR. Establishment and cytogenetic characterization of a cell line from a pulmonary metastasis of osteosarcoma. Cytotechnology. 2013;65:347–353. doi: 10.1007/s10616-012-9487-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Oncotarget are provided here courtesy of Impact Journals, LLC

RESOURCES