Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 12;3:23. doi: 10.21037/mhealth.2017.05.05

Table 1. Studies of web portals tethered to electronic medical records and used for diabetes management.

Study Sample Design Results Limitations
Sarkar et al. 2010 Adult diabetics (n=14,102) in the Kaiser Permanente Northern California Diabetes Registry (28% non-Hispanic white, 14% Latino, 21% African American, 21% Asian, and 17% multiracial or other ethnicity) Cross-sectional survey and review of electronic records on patient portal use About 40% of respondents (n=5,671) registered for the web portal. Those with limited health literacy were less likely to sign on to the web portal [adjusted odds ratio (OR) =1.7, 95% confidence interval (CI) =1.4–1.9] compared with those who did not have a limitation in health literacy The study findings may not be generalizable to uninsured patients.
Wade-Vuturo et al. 2013 54 adult patients with type 2 diabetes seen at a Nashville, TN hospital Mixed-methods study that included a cross-sectional patient survey Secure messaging between patient and clinician was positively associated with glycemic control (P=0.04) Small sample size, uncertain generalizability
Shimada et al. 2016 Diabetic patients registered for the Veterans Health Administration My HealtheVet patient portal 5-year retrospective cohort study of the link between use of My HealtheVet for refilling prescription medications, secure messaging, and lab tests used for managing type 2 diabetes Patients with elevated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at baseline who used secure messaging were more likely than nonusers to achieve glycemic control (adjusted OR =1.24; 95% CI: 1.14–1.34). Patients with elevated blood pressure at baseline who used web-based refills were more likely than nonusers to achieve blood pressure control (OR=1.08; 95% CI: 1.02–1.14). Non-randomized design, uncertain generalizability
Harris et al. 2009 Group Health Cooperative diabetic patients (n=15,427) aged ≥18 years Cross-sectional study. The outcomes were diabetes-related quality-of-care indicators [HbA1c <7%, blood pressure <130/80 mmHg, and low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol <100 mg/dL] About 19% of diabetic patients used secure messaging to communicate with their health care providers. Use of secure messaging was positively associated with HbA1c <7% [adjusted relative risk (RR) =1.36; 95% CI 1.16–1.58]. Frequent use of secure messaging was positively associated with increased outpatient visits. Nonrandomized design. The study findings may not be generalizable to uninsured patients.
Zhou et al. 2010 Adult Kaiser Permanente patients (n=35,423) in Southern California with diabetes or hypertension Matched-control analysis Secure messaging was positively associated with improved HbA1c screening and control (P<0.0001), LDL-C screening and control, retinopathy screening, and nephropathy screening. Secure messaging was also associated with improvement in blood pressure (P<0.001) Non-randomized design. The study findings may not be generalizable to uninsured patients
Tenforde et al. 2012 Adult diabetics followed at the Cleveland Clinic (n=10,746) aged 18–75 years Retrospective analysis. The outcome measures were dilated retinal exam, pneumococcal vaccination, test for microalbuminuria, foot exam, smoking cessation, HbA1C, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, LDL cholesterol, and body mass index Personal health record users had better diabetes quality measure profiles than non-users. The adjusted OR of HbA1c testing was 2.06 (P<0.01). Among personal health record users, increasing number of login days was not associated with more favorable diabetes quality measures Non-randomized design, lack of information about care received outside the Cleveland Clinic health system