Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2017 Jul 11;7:5070. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-05336-7

Polyglutamine expansion affects huntingtin conformation in multiple Huntington’s disease models

Manuel Daldin 1,#, Valentina Fodale 1,2,#, Cristina Cariulo 1, Lucia Azzollini 1,2, Margherita Verani 1,2, Paola Martufi 1, Maria Carolina Spiezia 1, Sean M Deguire 3, Marta Cherubini 4, Douglas Macdonald 5, Andreas Weiss 2,9, Alberto Bresciani 1, Jean-Paul Gerard Vonsattel 6, Lara Petricca 1,2, J Lawrence Marsh 7, Silvia Gines 4, Iolanda Santimone 8, Massimo Marano 8, Hilal A Lashuel 3, Ferdinando Squitieri 8, Andrea Caricasole 1,2,✉
PMCID: PMC5505970  PMID: 28698602

Abstract

Conformational changes in disease-associated or mutant proteins represent a key pathological aspect of Huntington’s disease (HD) and other protein misfolding diseases. Using immunoassays and biophysical approaches, we and others have recently reported that polyglutamine expansion in purified or recombinantly expressed huntingtin (HTT) proteins affects their conformational properties in a manner dependent on both polyglutamine repeat length and temperature but independent of HTT protein fragment length. These findings are consistent with the HD mutation affecting structural aspects of the amino-terminal region of the protein, and support the concept that modulating mutant HTT conformation might provide novel therapeutic and diagnostic opportunities. We now report that the same conformational TR-FRET based immunoassay detects polyglutamine- and temperature-dependent changes on the endogenously expressed HTT protein in peripheral tissues and post-mortem HD brain tissue, as well as in tissues from HD animal models. We also find that these temperature- and polyglutamine-dependent conformational changes are sensitive to bona-fide phosphorylation on S13 and S16 within the N17 domain of HTT. These findings provide key clinical and preclinical relevance to the conformational immunoassay, and provide supportive evidence for its application in the development of therapeutics aimed at correcting the conformation of polyglutamine-expanded proteins as well as the pharmacodynamics readouts to monitor their efficacy in preclinical models and in HD patients.

Introduction

Huntington’s disease (HD, MIM 143100) is a progressive, monogenic, autosomal dominant neurodegenerative disease caused by a CAG triplet repeat expansion, encoding polyglutamine (polyQ), within exon 1 of the HTT gene (MIM 613004)1, 2. This mutation leads to the generation of mutant HTT (mHTT) fragments, some of which contain the polyglutamine expansion, produced through mechanisms such as aberrant splicing or proteolysis3, 4. Amino-terminal mHTT fragments present a strong propensity to misfold and self-associate, giving rise to oligomers and the characteristic aggregates in relevant brain areas, and are sufficient to cause a pathology strongly reminiscent of HD in various animal models5–9. Misfolding of HTT amino-terminal fragments caused by the polyQ expansion is believed to play a key role in mHTT’s aggregation and toxicity, and indeed the expansion of the polyQ domain associated with the HD mutation was recently shown to alter the conformation of the carboxyl-term region of HTT10–12. Interestingly, phosphomimetic mutations at specific residues can at least partially ameliorate the conformational rigidity imposed on HTT by the mutant polyQ expansion10, and critically affect the subcellular localization, stability, aggregation and toxicity properties of mHTT13–18. The modification of residues associated with phosphorylation has been demonstrated to critically affect the toxic properties of huntingtin (S13/S16D; Gu et al.15) and other polyQ disease-associated proteins (S776 in Ataxin 119, 20; S215 and S792)21 in mice, thus suggesting that phosphorylation can profoundly affect pathology in vivo. Collectively, these datasets suggest that increasing HTT N17 phosphorylation might be a viable therapeutic approach aimed at ameliorating the toxic properties of mHTT through conformational modulation. However, addressing this hypothesis requires suitable assays to identify genetic and/or pharmacological modulators of HTT N17 phosphorylation, as well as to monitor HTT conformation in different HD models and, ultimately, in HD patients.

Various immunoassays, ranging from sandwich-type immunoassays22–24 to time-resolved Forster resonance energy transfer (TR-FRET) based assays25, 26 can inform on HTT levels in different sample types. However, studying HTT conformation remains a challenge and is predominantly addressed using biophysical approaches. Using purified HTT protein fragments and lysates from cells expressing exon 1 (residues 1–90), N548 (residues 1–548) or full length (FL, residues 1–3144) HTT proteins bearing wild type or mutant polyQ expansions, we recently reported a temperature-dependent, polyQ-dependent, reversible conformational change imparted on HTT by the polyQ expansion, as detected by TR-FRET immunoassays and confirmed by circular dichroism11. Similar findings were reported by others12. Interestingly, we also noticed the temperature- and polyQ-dependent conformational change using analogous TR-FRET assays interrogating the polyQ domain of other CAG repeat proteins, underscoring the general relevance of the methodology for CAG repeat protein misfolding diseases27.

TR-FRET immunoassay detection is based on the labeling of an antibody pair with a rare earth ion fluorophore donor and an acceptor fluorophore, thereby producing a specific TR-FRET signal when the donor and acceptor labeled antibodies bind to their antigen simultaneously28. The used antibody pair comprised previously characterized monoclonals (2B7 and MW1) interrogating two regions of known relevance for HTT conformation and biological properties: the N17 domain and the polyQ domain29–33. Structurally, the conformational immunoassay readout was associated with temperature- and polyQ-dependent variations in the α-helicity content in the Amino-terminal region of HTT11, 12. Indeed, cooling increased α-helicity more strongly for mutant than for wild type HTT, an effect which is exquisitely polyQ dependent11. Potentially, the rapid, scalable and homogeneous conformational TR-FRET-based immunoassay provides a useful screening tool to identify genetic and pharmacological modulators of mHTT conformation. However, interrogation of the utility of the conformational TR-FRET-based immunoassay for therapeutic development requires in the first instance demonstration of its translational relevance to mHTT protein in animal models of HD and in clinical samples.

We therefore investigated the capacity of the conformational immunoassay to detect mHTT conformation in selected preclinical models and in clinical samples (fibroblasts and lymphocytes from HD patients and post-mortem HD brain tissue), and found that the assay can efficiently detect the conformational constraint imposed by polyQ expansion in these samples. We also examined the capacity of bona-fide HTT N17 phosphorylation, rather than phosphomimetic mutations, to modulate HTT conformation as measured by the conformational immunoassay in purified, synthetic HTT exon 1 proteins bearing phosphorylated S13 and S16 residues. We find that compound S13/S16 phosphorylation (but not the corresponding individual modifications) can at least partially revert the conformational rigidity imposed by polyglutamine expansion on HTT.

Results

The conformational immunoassay preferentially reports on mutant huntingtin conformational behavior in mixed samples containing both wild type and mutant Huntingtin proteins

Previously, we and others reported novel immunoassays capable of detecting temperature- and polyQ-dependent, conformational changes in bacterially produced, purified HTT proteins and in lysates of cells overexpressing either wild type or mHTT11, 12. The conformational immunoassay is based on a TR-FRET readout employing antibodies interrogating two distinct epitopes of HTT, including one within the polyQ region (e.g. 2B7, specific for the N17 region of HTT, and MW1, recognizing a polyQ-dependent epitope; refs 25 and 26) See Fig. 1A for a schematic model representation. A change in the incubation temperature leads to a change in TR-FRET signal, an effect likely due to conformational flexibility11, 12. Expansion of the polyQ repeat impairs this conformational flexibility, reducing the temperature-dependent modulation of TR-FRET signal in a polyQ-dependent fashion (Fig. 1B; refs 11 and 12). Using an antibody combination where the polyQ domain is not interrogated by one of the antibodies in the TR-FRET IgG pair (for instance 2B7 and 4C9, this latter specific for an epitope within the polyproline region; Fig. 1C) results in an immunoassay where the TR-FRET signal is not sensitive to temperature changes and polyQ expansion.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

A schematic model illustrating the 2B7/MW1 conformational TR-FRET immunoassay for detection of HTT amino-terminal conformation (elaborated from ref. 11). The principal domains of HTT exon 1 are indicated (N17, polyQ and polyproline), together with the identity of the corresponding monoclonal antibodies used for TR-FRET detection (2B7, MW1 and 4C9, respectively). (A) The TR-FRET antibody pair (2B7/MW1) including one antibody targeting the polyQ domain (MW1) engages polyQ epitopes on wild type HTT differently depending on incubation temperature, as the wild type polyQ repeat is flexible and can adopt different conformations (a and b). This results in a higher ratio (≫1) between TR-FRET signals obtained from the same sample at the different temperatures (c). (B) The mutant polyQ repeat in mHTT is less flexible and availability/position of the polyQ epitopes for detection by the same TR-FRET antibody pair is relatively invariant at different temperatures (a and b), resulting in ratio between TR-FRET signals obtained from the same sample at the different temperatures close to 1(c). (C) Instead, a TR-FRET antibody pair (2B7/4C9) which does not include one antibody targeting the polyQ domain does not interrogate changes in polyQ conformation, does not significantly discern between wild type and mutant HTT and produces a ratio between TR-FRET signals obtained from the same sample at the different temperatures close to 1 (c).

However, the experiments previously reported did not interrogate the behaviour of the conformational immunoassay under conditions compatible with allelic heterozygosity, where both wild type and mHTT are expressed (such as in heterozygous mutant HD animal models and in clinical HD). Effectiveness in this setting is essential if the assays are to be useful in the development of therapeutic approaches aimed at modulating mHTT conformation. We therefore proceeded to monitor temperature- and polyQ-dependent conformation of HTT proteins when both wild type and mHTT are present, in samples of increasing complexity and translational relevance. We started with the simplest context, represented by purified, isolated proteins. The 2B7/MW1 and 2B7/4C9 TR-FRET assays11 were carried out to interrogate equimolar cocktails of wild type (normal polyQ length) and mutant (expanded polyQ length) HTT proteins, in comparison with samples containing either the individual wild type or the mutant proteins. Purified semisynthetic Exon 1 proteins with a Q23 or Q43 polyQ repeat34 or purified recombinant N573 fragments, Q23 and Q4523, and full length HTT Q16 and Q46 were used35. As the conformational immunoassay is dependent on interrogating the polyQ region with specific antibodies11, we expected that the signal resulting from engagement of the mutant protein would be relatively higher than that resulting from engagement of the wild type HTT protein owing to the presence of a larger number of epitopes for the polyQ-specific antibody30, 32, 36–38. As expected, the 2B7/MW1 TR-FRET signal obtained from the mHTT protein is significantly higher than that obtained on the wild type HTT protein, and in the wild-type and mutant protein cocktail this prevails (Fig. 2Aa; shown here for the N573 recombinant proteins only, for simplicity). When the samples are shifted to 4 °C, the expected polyQ-dependent change in signal was observed, with the wild type HTT protein fragment yielding a larger relative change than the mutant HTT protein fragment (Fig. 2Ab). Significantly, in the wild-type and mHTT protein cocktails the resulting TR-FRET values are comparable to those obtained with the individual mHTT proteins, presumably owing to the higher 2B7/MW1 signal obtained with the mutant protein (Fig. 2Aa,b and B), and this is true for all three purified HTT proteins examined (full length, N573 and exon 1; Fig. 2B). The 2B7/4C9 TR-FRET immunoassay did not reveal any temperature- and polyQ-dependent effects (Fig. 2Ca and b), and this is observed for all three HTT protein lengths (Fig. 2D). Therefore, the conformational immunoassay preferentially detects the behavior of the mHTT protein when both wild type and mutant proteins are present in the sample in a purified form, likely owing to the higher apparent affinity of the anti-polyQ antibody (MW1) for expanded polyglutamine repeats.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

The 2B7/MW1 conformational immunoassay preferentially detects mHTT conformation in cocktails of isolated HTT proteins with wild type or mutant polyQ. (A) The 2B7/MW1 TR-FRET assay performed on wild type HTT, mHTT or a cocktail (of equivalent final protein concentration) of the two proteins at 20 °C (a) or measured after shifting the same samples to 4 °C (b). For simplicity, only results for a representative experiment performed on the N573 HTT protein fragments are shown. (B) Summary of data (ratio TR-FRET signals at 4 °C/20 °C) obtained on individual isolated HTT proteins (3 lengths, namely exon 1, N573 and full length) or cocktails of equivalent final protein concentration (Wt + Mut). (C) Same as A, obtained on the same proteins using a (control) TR-FRET immunoassay (2B7/4C9) which does not interrogate the polyQ region and does not detect a temperature- and polyQ dependent conformational change11, 12, demonstrating efficient detection of all proteins. (D) Same as B (ratio TR-FRET signals at 4 °C/20 °C) obtained on the same proteins using a (control) TR-FRET immunoassay (2B7/4C9) which does not interrogate the polyQ region and does not detect a temperature- and polyQ dependent conformational change. In (B and D) values represent means and standard deviations of the means of three independent experiments (two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s post-test, degrees of significance are indicated).

Similar results to those observed using purified proteins were obtained using lysates of HEK293T cells transfected with expression plasmids encoding HTT Exon 1 (Q16 or Q72), HTT N548 (Q16 and Q55) or full length HTT proteins (Q23 and Q73), or co-expressing identical amounts of plasmid DNA encoding the wild type and the mutant HTT proteins. As observed when purified proteins were examined, HEK293T lysates expressing HTT proteins with an expanded (mutant) polyQ repeat yielded relatively higher 2B7/MW1 TR-FRET signals than cell lysates expressing wild type HTT (Fig. 3Ai and ii). In the wild-type and mutant HTT protein cocktails the resulting 2B7/MW1 TR-FRET values are comparable to those obtained from lysates expressing the individual mutant huntingtin proteins, again likely owing to the higher 2B7/MW1 signal obtained with the mutant proteins (Fig. 3Aa and b), and again this was observed irrespective of the length of the expressed HTT protein (Fig. 3B). The control analysis using the 2B7/4C9 antibody pair instead did not demonstrate any temperature- and polyQ-dependent effect (Fig. 3Ca,b and D). Correct expression of the different constructs was evaluated by Western blotting (Fig. 4). Therefore, under conditions modelling allelic heterozygosity in biological samples overexpressing wild type and mutant HTT proteins, the conformational immunoassay preferentially detects the behavior of the mutant (expanded polyQ) HTT.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

The 2B7/MW1 conformational immunoassay preferentially detects mHTT conformation in lysates of HEK293T cells transfected with plasmids encoding wild type and mutant HTT proteins. (A) The 2B7/MW1 TR-FRET assay performed on cell lysates expressing wild type HTT, mutant HTT or a cocktail of the two proteins (produced by co-transfecting equivalent concentrations of plasmid constructs encoding wild type and mutant HTT proteins) at 20 °C (a) or measured after shifting the same samples to 4 °C (b). For simplicity, only results for a representative experiment performed on lysates transfected with constructs encoding N548 HTT proteins are shown. (B) Summary of data (ratio TR-FRET signals at 4 °C/20 °C) obtained on lysates of HEK293T cells transfected with plasmids encoding wild type and mutant HTT proteins (3 lengths, namely exon 1, N548 and full length) or cocktails of plasmids encoding wild type and mutant HTT of equivalent concentration (Wt + Mut). (C) Same as A, obtained on the same lysates using a (control) TR-FRET immunoassay (2B7/4C9) which does not interrogate the polyQ region and does not detect a temperature- and polyQ dependent conformational change11, 12, demonstrating efficient detection of all proteins. (D) Same as B (ratio TR-FRET signals at 4 °C/20 °C) obtained on the same lysates using a (control) TR-FRET immunoassay (2B7/4C9) which does not interrogate the polyQ region and does not detect a temperature- and polyQ dependent conformational change. In (B and D) values represent means and standard deviations of the means of three independent experiments (two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s post-test, degrees of significance are indicated).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Representative Western blotting experiments of HEK293T cell lysates obtained by transient transfection with plasmids encoding HTT proteins, probed with antibody 4C9 (detecting HTT). (A) Western blot of HEK293T cell lysates transfected with either individual full length HTT proteins, wild type or mutant, or a cocktail of plasmids encoding both (of equivalent DNA concentration); samples were loaded on 6% Gel in order to better resolve the two full lengths proteins. (B) Western blot of HEK293T cell lysates transfected with either individual N548 HTT proteins, wild type or mutant, or a cocktail of plasmids encoding both (of equivalent DNA concentration). (C) Western blot of HEK293T cell lysates transfected with either individual exon 1 HTT proteins, wild type or mutant, or a cocktail of plasmids encoding both (of equivalent DNA concentration). In B and C samples were loaded on 4–12% gradient gel. The WB membranes in B and C were probed with anti-GAPDH antibody as loading control. GAPDH images are reported in supplementary information: Figs S2 and 3. It was not possible to test GAPDH as control in A because, the gel was run in order to resolve high molecular weight proteins, for distinguishing the wild type form from the mutant form of HTT. Indeed, the molecular weights included into the gel did not comprise proteins lower than 100 kDa (as GAPDH). All images were cropped from the original acquired file. Full-length blots are reported in Supplementary Information: Figures S1, S2 and S3.

Previously published data have not investigated HTT conformation when the protein is expressed at endogenous levels, reporting only on either individual purified proteins or lysates from cells overexpressing either wild type or mutant HTT11, 12. We proceeded to investigate the conformation of endogenously expressed HTT in cellular HD models where wild type and mutant HTT are expressed at normal levels from the endogenous locus. We analyzed cell lysates from HD patient-derived cells, namely immortalized primary fibroblasts from control and HD individuals, of known polyQ length status39. This immortalized fibroblast cell lysate sample set included 5 samples from control cells (polyQ < 35), 5 samples from HD cells (polyQ < 60), and 3 samples from cells bearing large expansions (polyQ > 60) representative of juvenile HD (Fig. 5A). We first investigated HTT levels in these samples using the 2B7/MW1 and 2B7/4C9 TR-FRET immunoassays and, as expected, due to increased apparent affinity of MW1 for expanded polyQ25, 26, the 2B7/MW1 assay revealed a polyQ-dependent signal (higher signal in HD fibroblasts relatively to control fibroblasts) while the 2B7/4C9 assay detected comparable HTT levels irrespective of polyQ length (data not shown). Consistent with data from overexpression cellular models presented above, the 2B7/MW1 TR-FRET conformational immunoassay detected a strong conformational difference between lysates from HD fibroblasts and control fibroblasts (Fig. 5B), with a clear polyQ-dependence (Fig. 5D). No such differences were observed with the control 2B7/4C9 TR-FRET immunoassay (Fig. 5C), consistent with the requirement to interrogate the polyQ region with one of the two antibody pairs11, 12. Collectively, these data indicate that the 2B7/MW1 TR-FRET based conformational immunoassay can effectively detect the conformational constraint imposed by polyQ expansion on HTT in human cellular models of HD, either under conditions where HTT is overexpressed or where it is expressed at endogenous levels from the relevant genomic locus.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

The 2B7/MW1 conformational immunoassay detects mHTT conformation in lysates of immortalized control and HD human fibroblasts (obtained from heterozygous HD donors). (A) Table illustrating the salient features of human control and HD immortalized fibroblasts used in this study. (B) Summary of 2B7/MW1 conformational immunoassay data (ratio TR-FRET signals at 4 °C/20 °C) obtained on lysates of control and HD fibroblasts. (C) Summary of 2B7/4C9 control immunoassay data (ratio TR-FRET signals at 4 °C/20 °C) obtained on the same lysates of control and HD fibroblasts. (D) Same as A, plotted against CAG (polyQ) repeat length rather than against control/HD genotype. In B and C values represent means and standard deviations of the means of three independent experiments (two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s post-test, degrees of significance are indicated).

Conformational interrogation of mutant huntingtin conformation in animal models of HD

Having determined that the 2B7/MW1 TR-FRET based conformational immunoassay can effectively detect HTT conformation in cellular models of HD, we turned to an analysis of tissues from animal models of HD.

The 2B7/MW1 TR-FRET conformational immunoassay, applied to brain tissue samples collected from the heterozygous mouse knock-in (KI) HD model (Q7/Q111)40, successfully detected the presence of mHTT and revealed the expected lack of conformational flexibility (data not shown). However, the TR-FRET assay did not detect HTT in knock-in mice harboring a humanized HTT exon 1 with a CAG7 repeat (Q7/Q7)41, as expected and previously reported23. Although we had no access to alternative mouse models expressing a wild type HTT with a polyQ length larger than Q7 and a corresponding mutant HTT protein, samples were available from a characterized Drosophila HD model expressing a large Amino-terminal (N469) fragment of human HTT with either Q25 or Q1209. HTT levels were investigated in these samples using the 2B7/MW1 and 2B7/4C9 TR-FRET immunoassays, and as expected the 2B7/MW1 assay revealed a polyQ-dependent signal (higher signal in animals expressing HTT with a mutant expansion) relative to flies expressing wild type HTT (Fig. 6Aa), while the 2B7/4C9 assay detected comparable HTT levels irrespective of polyQ length (Fig. 6Ca). Significantly, the 2B7/MW1 TR-FRET conformational immunoassay detected a strong conformational difference between lysates from HD Tg flies and control Tg flies (Fig. 6Aa,b and B). No such differences were observed with the control 2B7/4C9 TR-FRET immunoassay (Fig. 6Ca,b and D). These data indicate that the 2B7/MW1 TR-FRET based conformational immunoassay can effectively detect the conformational constraint imposed by polyQ expansion on HTT in animal models of HD.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

The 2B7/MW1 conformational immunoassay detects mHTT conformation in a Drosophila transgenic HD model. (A) The 2B7/MW1 TR-FRET assay performed on tissue homogenates of flies expressing a human wild type HTT N469 fragment or a mHTT N469 fragment at 20 °C (a) or measured after shifting the same samples to 4 °C (b). (B) Summary of data (ratio TR-FRET signals at 4 °C/20 °C) from three independent experiments. (C) Same as A, obtained on the same samples using a (control) TR-FRET immunoassay (2B7/4C9) which does not interrogate the polyQ region and does not detect a temperature- and polyQ dependent conformational change11, 12, demonstrating efficient detection of all proteins. (D) Same as B (ratio TR-FRET signals at 4 °C/20 °C) obtained on the same samples using a (control) TR-FRET immunoassay (2B7/4C9) which does not interrogate the polyQ region and does not detect a temperature- and polyQ dependent conformational change. In B and D values represent means and standard deviations of the means of three independent experiments (Datasets were tested for normality and Student’s t-test, degrees of significance are indicated).

Interrogation of mutant huntingtin conformation in peripheral cells and post-mortem brain tissue from control and HD individuals

Next, we sought to determine the potential translational value of the 2B7/MW1 TR-FRET conformational immunoassay, by interrogating biological samples of clinical relevance, namely samples of peripheral (lymphocytes) and central (post-mortem brain tissue) origin from control individuals or clinically and genetically characterized HD patients. Cell lysates of blood lymphocytes from healthy individuals (n = 5) and HD patients (N = 11; Fig. 7A) were analyzed for HTT protein levels with the 2B7/MW1 and 2B7/4C9 TR-FRET assays. Significantly, the 2B7/MW1 TR-FRET conformational immunoassay detected a strong conformational difference between lysates from HD lymphocytes and from control lymphocytes (Fig. 7B), with a clear polyQ-dependent effect (Fig. 7D). The control 2B7/4C9 TR-FRET immunoassay instead did not reveal changes in signal intensity dependent on polyQ length and temperature, as expected (Fig. 7C). Using the same TR-FRET immunoassays, we also investigated protein lysates from post-mortem brain tissue (frontal cortex) from control (n = 3) and clinically characterized HD individuals (n = 10; Fig. 8A). As expected, the 2B7/MW1 TR-FRET immunoassay revealed a higher signal in lysates from HD brain while the 2B7/4C9 TR-FRET immunoassay detected comparable levels of HTT protein in lysates from control and HD brain tissue (data showed in Supplementary Information: Figure S6). Notably, the 2B7/MW1 TR-FRET conformational immunoassay detected a strong conformational difference between lysates from HD brain and control brain (Fig. 8B), with a clear polyQ-dependent effect (Fig. 8D). The control 2B7/4C9 TR-FRET immunoassay instead did not reveal changes in signal intensity dependent on polyQ length and temperature (Fig. 8C). Given these results, we concluded that the 2B7/MW1 TR-FRET conformational immunoassay can detect polyQ-dependent conformational effects in HTT protein in human HD, both centrally and peripherally.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Open in a new tab

The 2B7/MW1 conformational immunoassay detects mHTT conformation in lysates of control and HD human PBMCs. (A) Table illustrating the salient features of human control and HD donors of samples for this study. (B) Summary of 2B7/MW1 conformational immunoassay data (ratio TR-FRET signals at 4 °C/20 °C) obtained on lysates of control and HD PBMCs. (C) Summary of 2B7/4C9 control immunoassay data (ratio TR-FRET signals at 4 °C/20 °C) obtained on the same lysates of control and HD fibroblasts. (D) Same as A, plotted against CAG (polyQ) repeat length rather than against control/HD genotype. In B and C values represent means and standard deviations of the means of three independent experiments (Datasets were tested for normality and Student’s t-test, degrees of significance are indicated).

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Open in a new tab

The 2B7/MW1 conformational immunoassay detects mHTT conformation in homogenates of control and HD post-mortem human brains (cortex). (A) Table illustrating the salient features of human control and HD donors of samples for this study. (B) Summary of 2B7/MW1 conformational immunoassay data (ratio TR-FRET signals at 4 °C/20 °C) obtained on homogenates of control and HD brain samples. (C) Summary of 2B7/4C9 control immunoassay data (ratio TR-FRET signals at 4 °C/20 °C) obtained on the same homogenates of control and HD brain samples. (D) Same as A, plotted against CAG (polyQ) repeat length rather than against control/HD genotype. In B and C values represent means and standard deviations of the means of three independent experiments (Datasets were tested for normality and Student’s t-test, degrees of significance are indicated). Signals obtained from TR-FRET immunoassays, preparatory for the conformational analysis, are reported in Supplementary Information: Figure S6.

Serine phosphorylation in the N17 domain influences mutant huntingtin conformation

Several studies suggest that phosphorylation (S13/S16 in particular) within the first 17 amino acids (N17 domain) of HTT affects critical biological properties of the protein, including subcellular localization, stability, aggregation, conformation and toxicity10, 13–17. Of these, the only study using HTT exon 1-like synthetic peptides with bona fide S phosphorylation is that of Mishra R et al.17, while most other studies were performed using HTT proteins bearing S13/16 mutations to either mimic (D or E) or abolish (A) phosphorylation, or using pharmacological modulation of cellular protein phosphorylation achieved through kinase inhibition. Previous studies by us11 and others12 indicated that compound phosphomimetic (S → D) or null (S → A) mutations at positions S13/S16 did not appear to alter HTT conformation, as measured by the conformational immunoassay, in either wild type or mutant HTT proteins expressed in cells. The recent availability of semisynthetic HTT exon 1 proteins bearing bona fide phosphorylation at specific residues within the N17 region34 prompted us to re-examine the conformational effects of S13/S16 HTT phosphorylation using purified semisynthetic proteins. We reasoned that controllable and defined conditions such as those attainable with isolated, purified proteins would better enable detection of smaller differences in conformation which might be difficult to detect in more complex samples (such as total lysates of cells). We elected to employ HTT exon 1 sequences bearing polyQ lengths of Q22 (representative of wild type HTT) and Q43, representative of a common mutant allele in HD42, 43. All semisynthetic proteins, either without or with phosphorylation and position S13, S16, S13 and S16 or bearing phosphomimetic (S → D) mutations at these positions for comparisons, were produced and quality controlled as described34. The HTT proteins were first resuspended with great care from lyophilized batches to reduce aggregation, and then examined by standard Western blotting (Fig. 9A). Although some evidence of protein aggregation was observed (variable amounts of immunoreactive material in the wells; Fig. S4), the vast majority of the HTT protein was resolvable on SDS-PAGE. Samples were then subjected to TR-FRET analysis using the 2B7/MW1 and 2B7/4C9 immunoassays at the two temperatures. As 2B7 recognizes an epitope within the N17 region of HTT, the 2B7/4C9 immunoassay served both as a conformational immunoassay control as well as a control TR-FRET assay for detecting interference with HTT N17 detection by 2B7 caused by S13/S16 phosphorylation. As shown in Figs 9B and 10A, both immunoassays efficiently detected the semisynthetic HTT proteins, with the expected temperature- and polyQ-dependent shift in TR-FRET signal produced by the 2B7/MW1 immunoassay (Fig. 9B) but not by the 2B7/4C9 assay (Fig. 10A). For simplicity, data pertinent to the analysis of HTT exon 1 peptides (Q22 and Q43) bearing no phosphorylation or the compound S13/S16 phosphorylation are shown. When the datasets obtained at the two temperatures with the 2B7/MW1 immunoassay were analyzed to investigate conformational effects, no significant variations arising from either single or compound phosphorylation at S13/S16 were observed for the wild type (Q22) HTT exon 1 protein, as was also the case for the single or compound phosphomimetic (S → D) mutations (Fig. 9C). Interestingly, however, a significant effect of the compound (S13 and S16) phosphorylation or the corresponding compound phosphomimetic mutations was observed when the 2B7/MW1 TR-FRET datasets relevant to the mutant (Q43) HTT protein were analyzed (Fig. 9D). The apparent effect of the compound phosphorylations or phosphomimetic mutations was to partly reduce the conformational constraint imposed by the mutant polyQ, an effect which was not produced by individual phosphorylation or phosphomimetic mutation at either S13 or S16 (Fig. 9D). Importantly, the control TR-FRET immunoassay (2B7/4C9) did not reveal any temperature- and polyQ-dependent change in signal at the two temperatures (Fig. 10B). Therefore, in the context examined N17 phosphorylation can alter mutant HTT conformation, at least partly ameliorating the conformational rigidity imposed by polyQ expansion. This may be the result of an alteration of N17 α-helicity, which is believed to be affected by polyQ expansion44.

Figure 9.

Figure 9

Open in a new tab

S13/S16 modifications in the N17 domain of HTT alter mHTT conformation as detected by the 2B7/MW1 conformational immunoassay. (A) Western blot of semisynthetic HTT exon 1 proteins (100 ng/lane; Q42/43 and Q23/22) used in this study (detection with mAb 4C9). WB images were cropped from the acquired original file. Full-length blots are reported in Supplementary Information: Figures S4 and S5. (B) Upper panels: 2B7/MW1 TR-FRET assay signal obtained on semisynthetic unmodified (Q23) or pS13/pS16 HTT exon 1 Q22 at the two temperatures. Lower panels: 2B7/MW1 TR-FRET assay signal obtained on semisynthetic unmodified (Q43) or pS13/pS16 HTT exon 1 Q42 at the two temperatures. (C) Summary of 2B7/MW1 conformational immunoassay data (ratio TR-FRET signals at 4 °C/20 °C) obtained on all wild type (Q23/22) semisynthetic proteins from three independent experiments. (D) Summary of 2B7/MW1 conformational immunoassay data (ratio TR-FRET signals at 4 °C/20 °C) obtained on all mutant (Q43/42) semisynthetic proteins from three independent experiments, each with three technical replicates (two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s post-test, degrees of significance are indicated).

Figure 10.

Figure 10

Open in a new tab

The 2B7/4C9 control immunoassay in semisynthetic HTT exon 1 proteins. (A) Upper panels: 2B7/4C9 TR-FRET assay signal obtained on semisynthetic unmodified(Q23) or pS13/pS16 HTT exon 1 Q22 at the two temperatures. Lower panels: 2B7/4C9 TR-FRET assay signal obtained on semisynthetic unmodified (Q43) or pS13/pS16 HTT exon 1 Q42 at the two temperatures. (B) Summary of 2B7/4C9 (control) TR-FRET immunoassay (ratio TR-FRET signals at 4 °C/20 °C), which does not detect the polyQ-dependent conformational change, obtained on all wild type (Q23/22) and all mutant (Q43/42) semisynthetic proteins from three independent experiments, each with three technical replicates (two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s post-test, degrees of significance are indicated).

Discussion

Protein misfolding is thought to be directly associated with protein conformation, which is known to be influenced by various factors such as protein stability, inter- or intramolecular protein-protein interactions, and post-translational modifications. A number of rare (such as HD) as well as common (such as Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases) neurodegenerative pathologies can be defined as a “conformational diseases” due to the presence of misfolded and aggregated proteins arising from mutation and/or abnormal accumulation. In the case of HD, expansion of the polyQ tract is causative and is known to strongly affect the biophysical and biological properties of HTT. Aside from the well-known effect of mutant polyQ expansion on HTT oligomerization/aggregation45–47, recent findings using novel assays point to a significant conformational constraint imposed on HTT monomeric protein by the mutant polyQ expansion10–12. Owing to their intrinsic characteristics (they are homogeneous, robust, scalable and rapid; ref. 11) these novel TR-FRET based immunoassays represent a practical readout to identify and exploit genetic and/or pharmacological means that can ameliorate the conformational impact imposed on HTT protein by the mutant polyQ expansion. However, at least three critical aspects need to be addressed. First, the capacity of the conformational immunoassays to detect this conformational impact in preclinical HD models of increasing complexity, such as those that might be employed to obtain evidence of therapeutic efficacy in vivo. Second, the clinical relevance of the readout – specifically, the capacity of the conformational immunoassays to detect the polyQ-dependent conformational effect in humans in both peripheral as well as central compartments and to establish an association with disease onset/progression. Third, the demonstration that perturbations can be identified that have the potential to ameliorate the polyQ-dependent conformational impact in mutant HTT protein. Here, we aimed at starting to address these aspects demonstrating the capacity of the conformational TR-FRET based immunoassay to detect the polyQ-dependent conformational effect under conditions modeling heterozygosity (cocktails of isolated proteins, lysates of cells overexpressing both wild type and mutant HTT) or representing bona fide heterozygosity (fibroblasts expressing both alleles from the endogenous locus). These findings indicated that several options may be open to enable screening for genetic and/or pharmacological modulators of HTT Amino-terminal conformation, including the use of isolated proteins and different cellular models expressing HTT proteins. Next, the capacity of the conformational immunoassay to detect the polyQ-dependent conformational effect on HTT was demonstrated in Drosophila (TgHD) HD models. This indicated that it may be possible to test genes/compounds identified in screens for the capacity to alter the polyQ-dependent conformational impact on HTT protein in relevant animal models of HD. Collectively, the data address the first aspect raised above, and suggest that the conformational immunoassays can detect the polyQ-dependent conformational impact on HTT in preclinical HD models such as those that may be employed during preclinical efficacy studies. The second aspect raised above, pertinent to the relevance of the polyQ-dependent conformational effect as detected by the conformational immunoassay for human HD, was at least partially addressed by the detection of this effect in samples (lymphocytes, post-mortem brain tissue) from HD patients. Although the correlation between polyQ expansion-mediated conformational change imposed on HTT and pathology remains to be further investigated, the evidence in the literature strongly indicates that polyQ expansion-mediated conformational changes are involved in HD pathology. As the conformational TR-FRET immunoassay detects polyQ-dependent conformational changes in HTT, these findings are supportive of relevance for human HD, considering the well-known inverse correlation between polyQ length and age of onset2, 46. Finally, to address the third aspect raised above, we attempted the identification of perturbations that might influence the polyQ-dependent conformational constraint on huntingtin. We reasoned that focusing on modifications of the N17 domain, a region of the HTT protein well known for its propensity to be extensively post-translationally modified and to modulate various aspects of the biophysics and biology of huntingtin10, 13–17, 48 might represent a logical starting point. In particular, phosphomimesis at S13 and S16 has been shown to influence aggregation, toxicity, subcellular localization and conformation of mHTT10, 13–16. Indeed, we and others11, 12 previously attempted to investigate the influence of N17 S13 and S16 phosphomimetic mutations on HTT’s polyQ-dependent conformational constraint as detected by the conformational immunoassay in lysates from cells overexpressing HTT proteins. However, the relative complexity of the sample (total cell lysates) as well as the unknown degree to which phosphomimetic mutations phenocopy bona fide phosphorylation may have masked any effects, particularly when these were small. Instead, the effects of bona fide phosphorylations present on isolated, semisynthetic wild type or mHTT exon 1 proteins of defined composition were investigated. In this defined, controlled context a significant effect of compound S13 and S16 phosphorylation was observed on mutant (Q43) HTT conformation as detected by the 2B7/MW1 TR-FRET conformational immunoassay. Interestingly, this effect was comparable to that observed with compound S13/S16 phosphomimetic mutations, while none of the individual modifications (phosphorylation or phosphomimesis) on S13 or S16 produced an observable effect. Interestingly, it has been postulated that that S13 primes modification of S16 and that the majority of phosphorylation at these residues exists as a compound (pS13/pS16) event16. Based on previous work11, the observed S13/S16 modification-induced change in the conformational immunoassay readout might reasonably be due to a change (presumably a decrease, as these modifications apparently reduce the conformational signal gap between wild type and mHTT) in α-helical structure of the N-terminus of the protein. mHTT is apparently more conformationally rigid than wild type HTT10–12, possesses a higher α-helical content, and cooling increases its α-helicity more strongly than for wild type HTT11, 49. A decrease in the α-helicity content of the mutant protein may result in increased conformational flexibility, effectively reducing the gap between conformational immunoassay values observed for the wild type and mutant HTT proteins and explaining the observed increase in the conformational immunoassay readout. Consistently, an effect of S13/S16 modifications on N17 α-helicity has been previously reported16, while studies on longer HTT-like peptides have failed to reveal significant effects17. Although further work, for instance using sensitive structural methodologies such as electroparamagnetic resonance spectroscopy50, is required to characterize the structural effects of S13/S16 modifications on HTT exon 1 structure, we propose that S13/S16 modifications can alter HTT Amino-terminal conformation and that this perturbation is detectable, at least in isolated proteins, by the 2B7/MW1 TR-FRET conformational immunoassay. Although the observed S13/S16 modification-induced conformational effect in mHTT is relatively small and perhaps not easily detectable in biological samples (particularly given the transient and incompletely penetrant nature of protein phosphorylation), it serves as a proof-of-principle that means might be devised to alter mHTT amino-terminal conformation. Interestingly, previous work has reported increased pS13/pS16 HTT levels in the YAC (128) mouse transgenic model of HD following treatment with ganglioside GM1, resulting in amelioration of the HD phenotype18. This is consistent with the effects of the phosphomimetic mutations S13D/S16D in another transgenic HD model15. It would be interesting to evaluate the effects of GM1 on HTT conformation in (YAC) 128 HD mice, as measured by the conformational TR-FRET immunoassay. This would address the possibility that the beneficial effects of GM1 on the HD phenotype in these mice may be at least in part due to an amelioration of mutant HTT conformational rigidity. Collectively, the data support the potential utility of the TR-FRET based conformational immunoassay as a tool to identify and develop genetic and/or pharmacological means to modify mHTT’s polyQ-induced conformational constraint, to further examine its role in HD pathogenesis and, potentially, to develop novel therapeutic approaches.

Methods

Plasmid constructs and proteins

cDNAs encoding amino-terminal fragments (exon 1, N548) or full length human HTT bearing different polyQ lengths were described previously11. Semisynthetic HTT exon 1 proteins (Q23, Q43) with/without relevant S13/S16 modifications were produced and quality-controlled essentially as described34. Recombinant human proteins containing the amino-terminal sequence of HTT with 573 amino acids (N573)23 and full length HTT with polyQ repeats of either wild type or mutant lengths were kindly provided by CHDI Foundation.

Cell lines

HEK293T cells were cultured in DMEM, 10% FBS, 1% Penicillin and Streptomycin (all from Gibco by Life Technologies) as per supplier’s instructions. Cells were routinely transfected with plasmid constructs using Lipofectamine 2000 (Life Technologies) as per manufacturer’s instructions. Twenty-four hours after transfection cells were harvested and lysed in lysis buffer (PBS, 0.4% Triton X-100) supplemented with 1X protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche).The fibroblast cell lines are listed in the table reported in Fig. 5A. They were obtained from NIGMS Human Genetic Cell Repository at the Coriell Institute for Medical Research. Cells were cultured in MEM, 15% FBS, 1% Penicillin and Streptomycin (all from Gibco by Life Technologies) in accordance with the supplier’s instructions, harvested, and lysed in lysis buffer (as reported previously for HEK293T cells).

Drosophila tissues

Drosophila tissues were processed as previously described9. Single wandering third instar larvae were ground for 1 min with an electric pestle in 30 ml PBS and combined with 30 ml 2x loading buffer.

Human samples

A program to collect biological specimen at IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza and at Mendel Institute of Human Genetics for research purposes, including blood samples, was approved by the Ethical Committee from Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza Foundation, section of Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II in Bari (Italy). Informed consents was obtained from patients and healthy control subjects. Recruitment of control and HD subjects was performed as described in ref. 51. A total of 11 HD subjects (stage I-IV), and 3 gender- and age-matched healthy controls were recruited. Subjects’ demographic, clinical and genetic characteristics are reported in Fig. 7A. All HD subjects revealed a CAG repeat expansion mutation, and all of them as well as controls were required to sign an informed consent before recruitment in the study. All human experiments were performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were obtained by standard methodologies, as described51 and cell pellets were immediately snap frozen. Total homogenate protein concentration was determined with BCA assay (Thermo Scientific). Post-mortem brain tissue (cortex) from ten patients at different pathological grades of HD52 and three healthy controls were examined in this study. Samples were obtained by the New York Brain Bank at Columbia University, New York, USA. Clinical and neuropathological data were summarized in Fig. 8A. They were transferred in 1x lysis buffer (1x PBS, 0.4% Triton X, 1x protein inhibitor cocktail, Roche), in ceramic beads containing vials (Lysing matrix D, MP Biomedicals, cat. n. 116913050) and homogenized with a FastPrep96 homogenizer (3 × 30 seconds cycles at 1600 rpm). Samples were kept at −80 °C overnight and clarified before total protein quantification.

Antibodies

The MW1 antibody was developed by Dr. Paul Patterson30 and obtained from the Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank developed under the auspices of the NICHD and maintained by The University of Iowa, Department of Biological Sciences, Iowa City, IA 52242. 2B7 and 4C9 antibody generation and characterization were described elsewhere33, 53. Purified 2B7, 4C9 and MW1 antibodies were obtained through the CHDI Foundation (New York, NY). Custom terbium cryptate and D2-fluorophore antibody labeling was performed by CisBio (Bagnols, France) as described previously11. Antibody MAB2166 was from Millipore (cat. n. MAB2166).

Western blot assay

Total protein levels of lysates obtained from HEK293T cells and Drosophila HD model, the latter produced as in ref. 9, were quantified using the Pierce BCA Protein Assay kit (Thermo Scientific) according to manufacturer’s protocol. 20 µg of total lysates were denatured at 95 °C in 4x loading buffer (125 mM TrisHCl pH 6.8, 6% SDS, 4 M urea, 4 mM EDTA, 30% glycerol, 4% β-mercaptoethanol and Bromophenol blue) and loaded on NuPAGE 4–12% Bis-Tris Gel or WedgeWell 6% Tris-Glycine Gel (Life Technologies). Proteins were transferred on PVDF membranes using the transfer apparatus from Life Technologies or Trans-Blot Turbo Transfer System from Biorad following manufacturer’s protocol. Membranes were stained for 30 minutes in TBS, 0.1% Tween, 0.4% PFA, before 1 hour blocking in TBS, 0.1% Tween, 5% not fat milk. Incubations with primary antibodies were performed overnight at 4 °C. Incubations with secondary anti-mouse- or rabbit horseradish peroxidase conjugated antibodies were carried out for 1 hour at room temperature. Protein bands were revealed using chemiluminescence substrate (ECL from Life Technologies) and images were acquired using a Chemidoc imager (Biorad). Similarly, synthetic huntingtin exon 1 proteins were loaded on NuPAGE 4–12% Bis-Tris Gel (Life Technologies) for Western blotting analysis.

TR-FRET assays

TR-FRET assays were performed as described previously11. In brief, samples were transferred to a low volume 384 well plate (Greiner) in serial dilutions starting from a defined concentration (1–4 µg/µl for total lysates and homogenates and 2 ng/µl for recombinant proteins) and the equivalent of one fifth of sample volume of antibody cocktail was then added. Soluble HTT was measured with 2B7-Tb/MW1-D2 and 2B7-Tb/4C9-D2 using 0.17 ng/µl of 2B7-Tb and 1.7 ng/µl of D2 labelled antibody. TR-FRET measurements were routinely performed following 1 hour incubation at 20 °C or overnight at 4 °C using an EnVision Reader (Perkin Elmer). Data analysis and evaluation of the temperature- and polyQ-dependent variation in TR-FRET signal were performed as previously described11. The points in the curves correspond to the averages of the background-subtracted fluorescence ratio (665/620) relative to the samples replicates and the bars represent the standard deviation among these replicates. The bar graphs represent the temperature- and polyQ-dependent variation and the standard deviations among values obtained in different experiments.

Statistics

Normality test, Student’s t-tests and One-way or Two-way ANOVA were performed to calculate the significance amongst repeated measurements (*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.005; ****p < 0.001) using GraphPad Prism software. For each experiment at least three independent replicas were analyzed.

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary information (527.4KB, pdf)

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Sara Tambone and Licia Tomei for supplying the fibroblast cell lines, LIRH Foundation for helping in the patients’ recruitment and support to Dr. Marano.

Author Contributions

A.C., M.D. and V.F. designed research; M.D., V.F., C.C., L.A., M.V., P.M. and M.C.S. performed research; S.M.D., M.C., V.M., A.W., A.B., J.G.V., L.P., J.L.M., S.G., I.S., M.M., H.A.L., D.M. and F.S. contributed new reagents or analytic tools; M.D., V.F., A.C., C.C., L.A., M.V., P.M. and M.C.S. analyzed data; A.C., M.D., V.F., and F.S. wrote the paper.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests. There are no patents, products in development, or marketed products to declare.

Footnotes

Manuel Daldin and Valentina Fodale contributed equally to this work.

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary information accompanies this paper at doi:10.1038/s41598-017-05336-7

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.A novel gene containing a trinucleotide repeat that is expanded and unstable on Huntington’s disease chromosomes. The Huntington’s Disease Collaborative Research Group. Cell72, 971–83 (1993). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 2.Ross CA, et al. Huntington disease: natural history, biomarkers and prospects for therapeutics. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2014;10:204–16. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2014.24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sathasivam K, et al. Aberrant splicing of HTT generates the pathogenic exon 1 protein in Huntington disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:2366–2370. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1221891110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gipson TA, Neueder A, Wexler NS, Bates GP, Housman D. Aberrantly spliced HTT, a new player in Huntington’s disease pathogenesis. RNA Biol. 2013;10:1647–1652. doi: 10.4161/rna.26706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hazeki N, Nakamura K, Goto J, Kanazawa I. Rapid aggregate formation of the huntingtin N-terminal fragment carrying an expanded polyglutamine tract. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1999;256:361–366. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1999.0337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lunkes A, et al. Proteases acting on mutant huntingtin generate cleaved products that differentially build up cytoplasmic and nuclear inclusions. Mol Cell. 2002;10:259–269. doi: 10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00602-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wang CE, et al. Accumulation of N-terminal mutant huntingtin in mouse and monkey models implicated as a pathogenic mechanism in Huntington’s disease. Hum Mol Genet. 2008;17:2738–2751. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddn175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Landles C, et al. Proteolysis of Mutant Huntingtin Produces an Exon 1 Fragment That Accumulates as an Aggregated Protein in Neuronal Nuclei in Huntington Disease. J. Biol. Chem. 2010;285:8808–8823. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.075028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Barbaro BA, et al. Comparative study of naturally occurring huntingtin fragments in Drosophila points to exon 1 as the most pathogenic species in Huntington’s disease. Hum Mol Genet. 2015;24:913–925. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddu504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Caron NS, Desmond CR, Xia J, Truant R. Polyglutamine domain flexibility mediates the proximity between flanking sequences in huntingtin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:14610–14615. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1301342110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Fodale V, et al. Polyglutamine- and temperature-dependent conformational rigidity in mutant huntingtin revealed by immunoassays and circular dichroism spectroscopy. PLoS One. 2014;9:e112262. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Cui X, et al. TR-FRET Assays of Huntingtin Protein Fragments Reveal Temperature and PolyQ Length-Dependent Conformational Changes. Sci. Rep. 2014;4:1–8. doi: 10.1038/srep05601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Zheng Z, Li a, Holmes BB, Marasa JC, Diamond MI. An N-terminal Nuclear Export Signal Regulates Trafficking and Aggregation of Huntingtin (Htt) Protein Exon 1. J. Biol. Chem. 2013;288:6063–6071. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.413575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Thompson LM, et al. IKK phosphorylates Huntingtin and targets it for degradation by the proteasome and lysosome. J Cell Biol. 2009;187:1083–1099. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200909067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Gu X, et al. Serines 13 and 16 are critical determinants of full-length human mutant huntingtin induced disease pathogenesis in HD mice. Neuron. 2009;64:828–840. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.11.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Atwal RS, et al. Kinase inhibitors modulate huntingtin cell localization and toxicity. Nat Chem Biol. 2011;7:453–460. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Mishra R, et al. Serine phosphorylation suppresses huntingtin amyloid accumulation by altering protein aggregation properties. J Mol Biol. 2012;424:1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2012.09.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Di Pardo A, et al. Ganglioside GM1 induces phosphorylation of mutant huntingtin and restores normal motor behavior in Huntington disease mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2012;109:3528–33. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1114502109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Duvick L, et al. SCA1-like disease in mice expressing wild-type ataxin-1 with a serine to aspartic acid replacement at residue 776. Neuron. 2010;67:929–935. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.08.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Emamian ES, et al. Serine 776 of ataxin-1 is critical for polyglutamine-induced disease in SCA1 transgenic mice. Neuron. 2003;38:375–387. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00258-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Scaramuzzino C, et al. Protein arginine methyltransferase 6 enhances polyglutamine-expanded androgen receptor function and toxicity in spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy. Neuron. 2015;85:88–100. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.12.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Massai L, et al. Development of an ELISA assay for the quantification of soluble huntingtin in human blood cells. BMC Biochem. 2013;14:34. doi: 10.1186/1471-2091-14-34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Macdonald D, et al. Quantification Assays for Total and Polyglutamine-Expanded Huntingtin Proteins. PLoS One. 2014;9:e96854. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0096854. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wild EJ, et al. Quantification of mutant huntingtin protein in cerebrospinal fluid from Huntington’ s disease patients. J. Clin. Invest. 2015;125:1–8. doi: 10.1172/JCI80743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Baldo B, et al. TR-FRET-based duplex immunoassay reveals an inverse correlation of soluble and aggregated mutant huntingtin in huntington’s disease. Chem Biol. 2012;19:264–275. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2011.12.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Weiss A, et al. Mutant huntingtin fragmentation in immune cells tracks Huntington’s disease progression. J Clin Invest. 2012;122:3731–3736. doi: 10.1172/JCI64565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Verani M, et al. Conformational modulation mediated by polyglutamine expansion in CAG repeat expansion disease-associated proteins. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2016;478:949–955. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2016.08.057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Baldo B, et al. TR-FRET-Based Duplex Immunoassay Reveals an Inverse Correlation of Soluble and Aggregated Mutant huntingtin in Huntington’s Disease. Chem. Biol. 2012;19:264–275. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2011.12.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Fodale V, et al. Polyglutamine- and Temperature-Dependent Conformational Rigidity in Mutant Huntingtin Revealed by Immunoassays and Circular Dichroism Spectroscopy. PLoS One. 2014;9:e112262. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ko J, Ou S, Patterson PH. New anti-huntingtin monoclonal antibodies: Implications for huntingtin conformation and its binding proteins. Brain Res. Bull. 2001;56:319–329. doi: 10.1016/S0361-9230(01)00599-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Khoshnan A, Ko J, Patterson PH. Effects of intracellular expression of anti-huntingtin antibodies of various specificities on mutant huntingtin aggregation and toxicity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2002;99:1002–1007. doi: 10.1073/pnas.022631799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Legleiter J, et al. Monoclonal Antibodies Recognize Distinct Conformational Epitopes Formed by Polyglutamine in a Mutant Huntingtin Fragment. J. Biol. Chem. 2009;284:21647–21658. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.016923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Weiss A, et al. Single-step detection of mutant huntingtin in animal and human tissues: A bioassay for Huntington’s disease. Anal. Biochem. 2009;395:8–15. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2009.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Ansaloni A, et al. One-pot semisynthesis of exon 1 of the Huntingtin protein: new tools for elucidating the role of posttranslational modifications in the pathogenesis of Huntington’s disease. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2013;53:1928–1933. doi: 10.1002/anie.201307510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Huang B, et al. Scalable production in human cells and biochemical characterization of full-length normal and mutant huntingtin. PLoS One. 2015;10:1–23. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Owens GE, New DM, West AP, Bjorkman PJ. Anti-PolyQ Antibodies Recognize a Short PolyQ Stretch in Both Normal and Mutant Huntingtin Exon 1. J. Mol. Biol. 2015;427:2507–19. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2015.05.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Li P, et al. The structure of a polyQ-anti-polyQ complex reveals binding according to a linear lattice model. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2007;14:381–387. doi: 10.1038/nsmb1234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Bennett MJ, et al. A linear lattice model for polyglutamine in CAG-expansion diseases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:11634–11639. doi: 10.1073/pnas.182393899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Wray S, et al. Creation of an open-access, mutation-defined fibroblast resource for neurological disease research. PLoS One. 2012;7:e43099. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Wheeler VC, et al. Early phenotypes that presage late-onset neurodegenerative disease allow testing of modifiers in Hdh CAG knock-in mice. Hum Mol Genet. 2002;11:633–640. doi: 10.1093/hmg/11.6.633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Trettel F, et al. Dominant phenotypes produced by the HD mutation in STHdh(Q111) striatal cells. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2000;9:2799–2809. doi: 10.1093/hmg/9.19.2799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Kieburtz K, et al. Trinucleotide repeat length and progression of illness in Huntington’s disease. J Med Genet. 1994;31:872–874. doi: 10.1136/jmg.31.11.872. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Bates, G. P. et al. Huntington disease. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 15005 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 44.Williamson TE, Vitalis A, Crick SL, Pappu RV. Modulation of polyglutamine conformations and dimer formation by the N-terminus of huntingtin. J. Mol. Biol. 2010;396:1295–1309. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2009.12.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Bates G. Huntingtin aggregation and toxicity in Huntington’s disease. Lancet. 2003;361:1642–1644. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13304-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.C.a. R, S. J. T. Huntington’s disease: From molecular pathogenesis to clinical treatment. Lancet Neurol. 2011;10:83–98. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70245-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Arrasate M, Finkbeiner S. Protein aggregates in Huntington’s disease. Exp. Neurol. 2012;238:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2011.12.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Gu X, et al. N17 Modifies mutant Huntingtin nuclear pathogenesis and severity of disease in HD BAC transgenic mice. Neuron. 2015;85:726–741. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.01.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Singer D, Zauner T, Genz M, Hoffmann R, Zuchner T. Synthesis of pathological and nonpathological human exon 1 huntingtin. J Pept Sci. 2010;16:358–363. doi: 10.1002/psc.1252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Bugg CW, Isas JM, Fischer T, Patterson PH, Langen R. Structural features and domain organization of huntingtin fibrils. J Biol Chem. 2012;287:31739–31746. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.353839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Di Pardo A, et al. Changes of peripheral TGF-beta1 depend on monocytes-derived macrophages in Huntington disease. Mol Brain. 2013;6:55. doi: 10.1186/1756-6606-6-55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Vonsattel JP, et al. Neuropathological classification of Huntington’s disease. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1985;44:559–577. doi: 10.1097/00005072-198511000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Paganetti P, et al. Development of a method for the high-throughput quantification of cellular proteins. Chembiochem. 2009;10:1678–1688. doi: 10.1002/cbic.200900131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary information (527.4KB, pdf)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES