Abstract
Preeclampsia (PE) is a common pregnancy-related complication, and polymorphisms in angiotensinogen (AGT), angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE), and angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) are believed to contribute to PE development. We implemented a hybrid study to investigate the influence of maternal and fetal ACE I/D, ACE G2350A, AGT M235T, AGT T174M, and AT1R A1166C polymorphisms on PE in Han Chinese women. Polymorphisms were genotyped in 1,488 subjects (256 patients experiencing PE, along with their fetuses and partners, and 360 normotensive controls with their fetuses). Transmission disequilibrium tests revealed that ACE I/D (P = 0.041), ACE G2350A (P = 0.035), and AT1R A1166C (P = 0.018) were associated with maternal PE. The log-linear analyses revealed that mothers whose offspring carried the MM genotype of AGT M235T had a higher risk of PE (OR = 1.54, P = 0.010), whereas mothers whose offspring carried the II genotype of ACE I/D or the GG genotype of ACE G2350A had a reduced risk (OR = 0.58, P = 0.039; OR = 0.47, P = 0.045, respectively). Our findings demonstrate that fetal ACE I/D, ACE G2350A, AGT M235T, and AT1R A1166C polymorphisms may play significant roles in PE development among pregnant Han Chinese women.
Introduction
Preeclampsia (PE) is a common pregnancy-related complication and a major contributor to maternal and infant morbidity and mortality1, 2. Women with PE and their infants are at an increased risk of cardiovascular and renal disease, and type 2 diabetes in later life3, 4. Furthermore, the risk of low birth weight, neonatal asphyxia, and perinatal fetal death are significantly higher in these babies5. PE complicates approximately 2–8% of pregnancies worldwide2, with an incidence of 5.22% in China6. Despite extensive researches, the detailed pathogenesis of PE remains unclear.
The renin-angiotensin system (RAS) is a peptide cascade comprising the following proteins: rennin (REN), angiotensinogen (AGT), angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE), and angiotensin I, II (ANG I, ANG II), and 1–7 (ANG1–7), as well as angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) and angiotensin II type 2 receptor (AT2R); RAS is believed to contribute to PE development7–9. All RAS components are expressed in and around the spiral arteries in pregnant women during the first trimester, where they contribute to pregnancy-induced vessel remodeling10, 11. In addition to circulating RAS, a tissue-based RAS exists in the utero-placental unit7. This local RAS influences the regulation of regional maternal intervillous blood flow and assists in local spiral artery remodeling, and its dysregulation causes shallow placental implantation and utero-placental ischemia12, 13, leading to PE14. Retrospective studies have suggested that heritable allelic variations, particularly those in the utero-placental RAS, are associated with defective placental vascular development. Analysis of these variations could become the cornerstone for understanding the genetics of PE15. Furthermore, the placenta consists of both maternal and fetal tissue, and placental RAS components are partly derived from the expression of the fetal genes16–18. Therefore, both maternal and fetal RAS genes might contribute to PE pathogenesis. A study based on the Swedish Birth Registry revealed that 35% and 20% of the variance in PE liability is attributable to maternal and fetal genetic effects, respectively19. However, few studies have considered the maternal and fetal effects of RAS gene polymorphisms together.
Among the RAS gene single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), ACE insertion/deletion (ACE I/D, rs1799752), ACE G2350A (rs4343), AGT Met235Thr (M235T, rs699), AGT Thr174Met (T174M, rs4762), and AT1R A1166C (rs5186) are related to tissue and plasma RAS component concentrations, and therefore thought to be relevant to PE development20–25. Many noninfectious diseases are caused by low-penetrance alleles interacting with environmental factors26. A series of studies have revealed the gene–environment interactions between maternal RAS SNPs and environmental factors such as cigarette smoking, BMI, mental stress27–29. Therefore, the objective of the current study was to investigate the effects of these maternal and fetal polymorphisms, as well as potential maternal gene–environment interactions, on PE.
Results
Patient Characteristics
The characteristics of the study participants are presented in Table 1. There was no difference in maternal age between the two groups. The systolic and diastolic BP values were much higher in PE patients than in controls (both P < 0.001). Compared with the control group, a higher proportion of patients were educated to below high school level (61.8% vs. 46.6%, P < 0.001), and had a family history of hypertension (28.9% vs. 18.8%, P = 0.006). Pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) was significantly higher (21.36 ± 3.59 kg/m2 vs. 23.06 ± 3.78 kg/m2, P < 0.001), and gestational age at delivery was significantly lower (37.29 ± 2.47 weeks vs. 38.46 ± 2.48 weeks, P < 0.001) in patients than in controls. The average fetal birth weight was lower in patients than in controls (2.97 ± 0.68 kg vs. 3.27 ± 0.44 kg, P < 0.001), and the PE group had a higher proportion of intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) cases than the control group (27.5% vs. 3.9%, P < 0.001).
Table 1.
Case ± SD/n (%) | Control ± SD/n (%) | P | |
---|---|---|---|
Maternal age (year) | 28.77 ± 5.39 | 28.33 ± 4.86 | 0.298 |
Systolic BP (mm Hg) | 150.90 ± 14.78 | 112.24 ± 11.57 | <0.001 |
Diastolic BP (mm Hg) | 101.18 ± 10.12 | 72.11 ± 8.06 | <0.001 |
Education background | <0.001 | ||
Junior middle school and Lower | 154 (61.8%) | 159 (46.6%) | |
High school or above | 95 (38.2%) | 182 (53.4%) | |
Pre-pregnancy BMI (Kg/m2) | 23.06 ± 3.78 | 21.36 ± 3.59 | <0.001 |
Parity | 0.074 | ||
Primipara | 132 (52.0%) | 204 (59.3%) | |
Multipara | 122 (48.0%) | 140 (40.74%) | |
Fetal birth weight | 2.97 ± 0.68 | 3.27 ± 0.44 | <0.001 |
IUGR | |||
Yes | 63 (27.5%) | 12 (3.9%) | <0.001 |
No | 166 (72.5%) | 293 (96.1%) | |
Gestational age at delivery (week) | 37.29 ± 2.47 | 38.46 ± 2.48 | <0.001 |
Family history of hypertension | 0.006 | ||
Yes | 67 (28.9%) | 59 (18.8%) | |
No | 165 (71.1%) | 255 (81.2%) | |
Smoking during pregnancy | 0.705 | ||
Yes | 2 (0.8%) | 5 (1.4%) | |
No | 248 (99.2%) | 340 (98.6%) |
SD: standard deviation; BMI: body mass index; bold value indicates significant result; IUGR: intrauterine growth restriction.
SNP Genotype Distributions
The association analyses of ACE I/D, ACE G2350A, AGT M235T, AGT T174M, and AT1R A1166C were performed separately. For each SNP, we excluded families in which one or more members failed to be genotyped, as well as those inconsistent with Mendelian inheritance. The distribution of genotypes and alleles of all five polymorphisms were in Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium (HWE). The genotype and allele counts of the five SNPs are shown in Supplementary Table S1. The associations of the polymorphisms with PE are shown in Table 2. The fetal AGT M235T polymorphism in the dominant model (TT + MT/MM) was found to be associated with PE (OR = 1.40, 95% CI: 1.01–1.94, P = 0.043). However, the association disappeared after multiple testing corrections (false discovery rate [FDR]).
Table 2.
SNP | Model | Maternal | Fetal | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OR | P | P* | OR | P | P * | ||
ACE I/D | dominant | 1.04 (0.73–1.48) | 0.822 | 0.997 | 0.84 (0.60–1.19) | 0.327 | 0.997 |
recessive | 0.89 (0.60-1.33) | 0.578 | 0.997 | 0.87 (0.56–1.33) | 0.516 | 0.997 | |
ACE G2350A | dominant | 1.11 (0.79–1.55) | 0.368 | 0.997 | 0.88 (0.63–1.22) | 0.442 | 0.997 |
recessive | 0.86 (0.52–1.43) | 0.559 | 0.997 | 0.72 (0.40–1.30) | 0.274 | 0.997 | |
AGT M235T | dominant | 1.10 (0.79–1.53) | 0.651 | 0.997 | 1.40 (1.01–1.94) | 0.043 | 0.930 |
recessive | 0.82 (0.45–1.51) | 0.455 | 0.997 | 0.98 (0.53–1.80) | 0.946 | 1.000 | |
AGT T174M | dominant | 1.00 (0.66–1.50) | 0.781 | 0.997 | 0.79 (0.51–1.23) | 0.500 | 0.997 |
recessive | 1.85 (0.49–6.96) | 0.355 | 0.997 | 5.95 (0.66–53.56) | 0.178 | 0.997 | |
AT1R A1166C | dominant | - | 0.505 | 0.997 | - | 0.600 | 0.997 |
recessive | 1.05 (0.63–1.74) | 1.000* | 1.000 | 0.95 (0.54–1.67) | 1.000* | 1.000 |
Statistical significance was tested at P < 0.05; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; *, using Fisher exact probability; “-” means the result could not be calculated because of limited counts; P *, corrected P-value after FDR procedure.
Transmission Disequilibrium Test (TDT) Analyses in Case-Parent Triad Families
TDTs were employed to test the linkage between the polymorphisms and PE, and to exclude the false association caused by the population structure. We selected all the heterozygous parents, and identified the alleles of the five SNPs that were transmitted or untransmitted from the parents to the offspring. At P = 0.05, significant results were obtained for ACE I/D, ACE G2350A, and AT1R A1166C, suggesting that these three fetal SNPs are associated with PE (Table 3).
Table 3.
SNP | counts of trans vs. non-trans alleles | TDT | P | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
transmitted allele | non-transmitted allele | ||||
A1 | A2 | ||||
ACE I/D | A1 | 160 | 139 | ||
A2 | 107 | 94 | 4.16 | 0.041 | |
ACE G2350A | A1 | 201 | 124 | ||
A2 | 93 | 50 | 4.43 | 0.035 | |
AGT M235T | A1 | 265 | 84 | ||
A2 | 108 | 41 | 3.00 | 0.083 | |
AGT T174M | A1 | 395 | 40 | ||
A2 | 34 | 7 | 0.49 | 0.486 | |
AT1R A1166C | A1 | 410 | 38 | ||
A2 | 20 | 2 | 5.59 | 0.018 |
A1 and A2 represent the two alleles of each SNP.
Estimation of the Effects of Maternal and Fetal Polymorphisms
To estimate the effects of the maternal and fetal genes, a log-linear model was employed. As shown in Table 4, three fetal SNPs were found to be related to PE. Mothers of offspring carrying the ACE I/D II or ACE G2350A GG genotypes had a reduced PE risk (OR = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.36–0.91; OR = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.26–0.88, respectively). Mothers of offspring carrying the AGT M235T MM genotype had an increased risk of developing PE (OR = 1.54, 95% CI: 1.13–2.10). No significant associations were detected between the five maternal SNPs, as well as fetal AGT T174M and AT1R A1166C polymorphisms, and PE. Furthermore, the effects of these SNPs on severe (s)PE and mild (m)PE were analyzed (Table 5). An increased risk of sPE was observed for the fetal AGT M235T MM genotype. Neither the fetal SNPs nor the maternal SNPs were associated with mPE significantly.
Table 4.
SNP | Genotype | Maternal genotype | Offspring genotype | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
OR (95% CI) | P | OR (95% CI) | P | ||
ACE I/D | DD | reference | 0.491 | reference | 0.039 |
ID | 1.12 (0.79–1.59) | 0.80 (0.64–1.22) | |||
II | 1.31 (0.83–2.04) | 0.58 (0.36–0.91) | |||
ACE G2350A | AA | reference | 0.589 | reference | 0.045 |
AG | 0.99 (0.67–1.46) | 0.86 (0.61–1.21) | |||
GG | 1.19 (0.63–2.26) | 0.47 (0.26–0.88) | |||
AGT M235T | TT | reference | 0.570 | reference | 0.010 |
MT | 0.97 (0.70–1.34) | 1.24 (0.70–2.23) | |||
MM | 0.70 (0.39–1.27) | 1.54 (1.13–2.10) | |||
AGT T174M | TT | reference | 0.085 | Reference | 0.442 |
MT | 1.68 (0.99–2.82) | 0.76 (0.46–1.26) | |||
MM | 3.16 (0.60–16.78) | 1.35 (0.33–5.55) | |||
AT1R A1166C | AA | reference | 0.699 | Reference | 0.364 |
AC | 1.17 (0.73–1.89) | 0.69 (0.41–1.15) | |||
CC | 2.05 (0.17–24.31) | - |
“-” means the result could not be calculated because of limited counts.
Table 5.
SNP | Genotype | Maternal genotype | Offspring genotype | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OR (95% CI) | P | OR (95% CI) | P | |||
ACE I/D | DD | reference | reference | |||
ID | m | 1.08 (0.64–1.89) | 0.491 | 0.43 (0.18–1.03) | 0.100 | |
II | 1.91 (0.32–11.44) | 0.27 (0.06–1.17) | ||||
ID | s | 1.07 (0.66–1.74) | 0.654 | 1.14 (0.76–1.71) | 0.054 | |
II | 1.31 (0.71–2.43) | 0.65 (0.36–1.16) | ||||
ACE G2350A | AA | reference | reference | |||
AG | m | 0.96 (0.45–2.07) | 0.260 | 0.52 (0.23–1.15) | 0.215 | |
GG | 2.44 (0.75-8.01) | 0.39 (0.09–1.68) | ||||
AG | s | 0.95 (0.81–1.63) | 0.700 | 0.91 (0.65–1.27) | 0.354 | |
GG | 1.16 (0.65–2.05) | 0.64 (0.36–1.17) | ||||
AGT M235T | TT | reference | reference | |||
MT | m | 0.74 (0.31–1.77) | 0.508 | 1.32 (0.31–1.74) | 0.477 | |
MM | 0.45 (0.39–5.44) | 1.47 (0.39–5.52) | ||||
MT | s | 0.94 (0.67–1.33) | 0.437 | 1.19 (0.62–2.30) | 0.004 | |
MM | 0.66 (0.35–1.32) | 1.74 (1.25–2.41) | ||||
AGT T174M | TT | reference | reference | |||
MT | m | 2.00 (0.18–22.04) | 0.085 | 1.50 (0.42–5.31) | 0.442 | |
MM | 2.33 (0.60–9.02) | - | ||||
MT | s | 1.60 (0.90–2.84) | 0.174 | 0.67 (0.39–1.16) | 0.283 | |
MM | 4.31 (0.43–43.69) | 1.22 (0.29–5.11) | ||||
AT1R A1166C | AA | reference | reference | |||
AC | m | 1.17 (0.21–2.83) | 0.928 | 0.76 (0.21–2.80) | 0.921 | |
CC | - | - | ||||
AC | s | 1.26 (0.76–2.07) | 0.545 | 0.67 (0.38–1.16) | 0.361 | |
CC | 2.46 (0.21–29.49) | - |
“-” means the result could not be calculated because of limited counts.
Maternal Gene-Environment Interaction Analyses
A likelihood ratio test (LRT) based on the log-linear approach was used to evaluate the interaction between environmental factors and maternal genes. In the log-linear model of LRT, the patients are separated into exposed and unexposed groups 26. Therefore, in the current study, only the two significant categorical variables, education background (beneath or above high school) and pre-pregnancy BMI (<24 kg/m2 or ≥24 kg/m2) were evaluated. The results revealed that pre-pregnancy BMI had significant interactions with AGT M235T (P LRT = 0.029) and AGT T174M (P LRT = 0.015; Table 6). Then, we calculated the ORs for each maternal genotype in the two strata of BMI (Table 7). Among women with BMI ≥ 24 kg/m2, the ORs for the maternal M allele of both the SNPs were <1, but without statistical significance (P > 0.05).
Table 6.
SNP | Environmental factor | χ2 | P LRT |
---|---|---|---|
ACE I/D | education background | 0.0159 | 0.992 |
pre-pregnancy BMI | 4.8175 | 0.09 | |
ACE G2350A | education background | 0.042 | 0.979 |
pre-pregnancy BMI | 0.682 | 0.711 | |
AGT M235T | education background | 5.66 | 0.059 |
pre-pregnancy BMI | 7.07 | 0.029 | |
AGT T174M | education background | 0.428 | 0.807 |
pre-pregnancy BMI | 8.428 | 0.015 | |
AT1R A1166C | education background | 0.00152 | 0.999 |
pre-pregnancy BMI | 0.152 | 0.927 |
LRT, likelihood ratio test; the tests were conducted using case-parent triads.
Table 7.
SNP | BMI (n) | Genotype | OR (95% CI) | P |
---|---|---|---|---|
AGT M235T | <24 kg/m2 (137) | TT | reference | 0.352 |
MT | 1.02 (0.67–1.55) | |||
MM | 0.54 (0.22–1.29) | |||
≥24 kg/m2 (80) | TT | reference | 0.880 | |
MT | 0.96 (0.52–1.74) | |||
MM | 0.76 (0.26–2.24) | |||
AGT T174M | <24 kg/m2 (134) | TT | reference | 0.339 |
MT | 1.42 (0.79–2.54) | |||
MM | 2.51 (0.68–9.31) | |||
≥24 kg/m2 (75) | TT | reference | 0.473 | |
MT | 0.55 (0.21–1.45) | |||
MM | 0.86 (0.12–5.96) |
Discussion
To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the association between maternal/fetal RAS polymorphisms and PE in a hybrid design with a large sample size of 1,488 patients, focusing on the Chinese Han population.
PE is believed to be a two-stage disease triggered by abnormal placentation and deficient spiral artery remodeling, progressing with placental ischemia, and the latter stage leads to the development of hypertension and proteinuria30. The widespread vascular and endothelial dysfunction during placental ischemia may be caused by an imbalance of angiogenic factors, including RAS components31. A few studies had previously explored the association between RAS genes and PE32–38, but they mainly used a case-control study design. It must be noted here that the case-control study design is less sensitive in the detection of parent-of-origin genetic effects. Moreover, the test power is lower than that of family-based designs such as the case-parent/mother-control design39, 40. Therefore, to elucidate the roles of maternal and fetal RAS genes in PE development, we adopted a hybrid case-parent/mother-control design, instead of a traditional case-control study design.
In the current study, allele and genotype frequencies were investigated for all five RAS genes (ACE I/D, ACE G2350A, AGT M235T, AGT T174M, and AT1R A1166C); however, no significant differences were observed in the patients or fetuses. The TDT and mating-type–stratified likelihood-based methods (log-linear approach) applied in the current study can overcome the limitations of the case-control study design, as it involves the comparison of the genotypes of cases to that of their nuclear family members, whose nontransmitted chromosomes serve as ethnically matched genetic controls41. In the TDT, positive results were obtained for ACE I/D, ACE G2350A, and AT1R A1166C. The results of the log-linear modeling approach were approximately consistent with those of the TDT. Compared with the TDT results, the log-linear modeling approach failed to detect the effect of fetal AT1R A1166C, but detected a correlation between fetal AGT M235T and PE. In the log-linear modeling approach, there was no count for the CC type of fetal AT1R A1166C polymorphism, and therefore, we could not calculate its effect. It may be noted here that the power of log-linear modeling in a hybrid design with the current sample size can approach 0.9. However, the TDT resulted in a power of 0.72, which might explain why the log-linear modeling approach could find a positive association between fetal AGT M235T and PE, whereas TDT could not. Comprised of population-based controls and affected family-triads, the hybrid design affords a more detailed analysis of the genetic effects of the offspring genes42, and is particularly suitable for maternal- and offspring-based genetic analyses of gestational and congenital diseases. It is more powerful than a case-control design43 or pure case-parent design40 with the same sample size.
In addition, in this study, we investigated the effects of the five SNPs on sPE and mPE respectively. Since the sample of mPE (39) was limited, we failed to find any associations between the fetal/maternal SNPs with mPE. However, the positive effects of the fetal ACE I/D II type (P = 0.039) and fetal ACE G2350A GG type (P = 0.045) in PE vanished in sPE (P-value were 0.054 and 0.354 respectively) as the sample size of sPE diminished. In contrast, the most significant risk of PE observed for fetal AGT M235T MM type (P = 0.010) remained in sPE (P = 0.004). Meta-analyses, case–control studies and animal experiments have shown the AGT M235T polymorphism to be related to higher AGT levels and an increased risk of hypertension12, 44. The AGT M235T polymorphism might therefore be of higher functional relevance in modifying RAS activity.
Fetal-derived placental tissue participates in RAS factor secretion and regulation, thereby possibly contributing to PE development8. Previous molecular biology-based studies have provided clues on the risk-inducing effect of the AGT M235T MM genotype and the protective effects of the ACE I/D II and ACE G2350A GG genotypes. The expression of the I polymorphism of ACE I/D inhibits ACE activity in serum, and therefore, decreases the risk of PE, compared to the D polymorphism45. Another study has indicated that a combination of the AA genotype of ACE G2350A and DD genotype of ACE I/D are linked with a higher-than-average blood pressure level46. Women who were homozygous for the AGT M235T M variant had significantly higher plasma angiotensinogen concentrations than those who were homozygous for the T variant, which might represent a possible pathogenic mechanism of PE18.
Few studies have examined the fetal genetic effects of RAS genes on maternal PE risk. A previous Romanian case-control study included 36 mother/newborn pairs with PE complications and 71 controls. Their findings on fetal ACE G2350A, AGT 174M, and ACE I/D were in accordance with our results21. The discrepancy in the effect of fetal AGT M235T, which was positive in the current study but negative in the Romanian study, may partly arise from the different study designs, besides the different genetic background and sample size. Moreover, Arngrimsson et al. demonstrated that the AGT M235T variant might be of paternal origin47 and Takimoto et al. also demonstrated that a single renin gene inherited from the father in newborn mice might increase the risk of maternal hypertension during pregnancy17. The study of Walther T found ACE activity was significantly higher in normal fetuses than incorresponding maternal plasma16, which may suggest a more evident function of the fetal ACE gene than the maternal gene.
Many previous studies have investigated the association between the five maternal genotypes and PE, but the conclusions were weak and inconsistent21, 35, 48, 49. The maternal ACE I/D, AGT M235T, AGT T174M, and AT1R A1166C genotypes were not associated with PE in our study, which is consistent with the results of the recently published meta-analyses50–52. Few studies have investigated the effect of maternal ACE G2350A in the Asian population. The higher power of our study may provide additional evidence to corroborate the negative associations.
To test the interaction between maternal genes and environmental factors, we mainly considered education background and pre-pregnancy BMI. Screening of risk factors revealed that the education status of the mothers might influence their health behaviors and nutrition53, which may in turn play a role in PE development. However, the LRT found no interaction between the education background and gene polymorphisms. With regard to the interaction of BMI and AGT M235T, a previous Japanese case-control study showed a valid interaction29. In our study, while a significant association was suggested by the LRT test, the association was not significant in the subsequent stratified analysis, which may be due to the limited power of the decreased sample size after stratification.
The current study demonstrated, for the first time, that fetal ACE I/D, ACE G2350A, AGT M235T, and AT1R A1166C were significantly associated with PE development in Han Chinese women. Further, an analysis of gene–environmental interactions revealed that a pre-pregnancy BMI > 24 was likely to interact with AGT M235T and AGT T174M in PE pathogenesis. Although we performed in-depth analyses to explore maternal/fetal genetic effects on PE, early PE, as a special disease entity of PE, was not investigated. Besides, as important indicators of the liver function and outcome predictors of PE patients54, 55, the association between PE and the level of aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) were also not analyzed. Nevertheless, our findings on the fetal SNPs reinforce the view that fetal genes contribute to PE development19; further prospective studies are needed to confirm and replicate these associations.
Methods
Study Settings and Participants
This was a hybrid study that included case-parent triads and control-mother dyads, recruiting participants from January 2008 to October 2014 from two Maternal and Child Care Hospitals in Hubei and Henan provinces. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Tongji Medical College, and all participants gave informed consent before participating in the study. All experiments were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. PE patients who fulfilled the following criteria were recruited: BP ≥ 140/90 mmHg after 20 weeks of gestation and new onset of proteinuria, with or without convulsions or seizures. sPE was distinguished from mPE, using the following two criteria: BP ≥ 160/110 mmHg on two occasions at least 6 h apart in a woman on bed rest, accompanied by proteinuria ≥3+ reading on dipstick testing on two random samples at least 6 h apart56. Controls were healthy normotensive pregnant women delivering at the same hospital. Exclusion criteria included a history of cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, renal disease, or other pregnancy complications, as well as a serious abnormality in the neonate or a multiple gestation. According to the current diagnostic criteria of IUGR in China57, all newborns with a birth weight below the tenth percentile or less than two standard deviations below the mean weight for gestational age, or term infants with a birth weight less than 2500 grams can be diagnosed as IUGR. Two hundred and fifty-six PE patients, with their partners and offspring, and 360 controls with their offspring, all of Han ethnicity, were recruited. Among the 256 PE patients, 39 exhibited mPE and 217 exhibited sPE.
Genotyping Assays
In the case group, we collected 5 mL of venous blood from the patients and their partners, and umbilical cord blood from the fetuses; in the control group, we collected 5 mL of venous blood from the patients and the umbilical cord, in EDTA-containing tubes. Genomic DNA was extracted from blood leukocytes, using the Puregene® Blood Kit (QIAGEN, Germantown, MD, USA), and was stored at −80 °C. DNA quality and quantity was evaluated using a NanoDrop™ 2000 spectrophotometer (Wilmington, DE, USA). The ACE I/D genotypes were determined by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification and agarose gel electrophoresis, as described previously58. To avoid the mistyping of the ID genotype as DD, each sample found to have the DD genotype was subjected to a second independent PCR amplification with a set of primers that recognize an insertion-specific sequence, designed as described by Lindpaintner et al.59 (see Supplementary Fig. S1). The remaining four polymorphisms were genotyped using TaqMan™ SNP Genotyping Assays (Applied Biosystems [ABI], Foster City, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol, using the 7900HT Fast Real-Time PCR System (ABI).
Statistical Analysis
In the current study, the most frequently homozygous parental genotypes were regarded as the reference genotypes. A 2-tailed P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. HWE for all genotypes in the control group was evaluated by a goodness-of-fit χ2 test. Differences in the demographic characteristics and genotype frequency distributions between the cases and controls were evaluated by Pearson’s χ2 and Student’s t-tests, where appropriate. The Monte Carlo method and Fisher’s exact probability were employed, respectively, instead of Pearson’s χ2 test when >20% cells had expected frequencies between 1 and 5 or when any frequency was <1. The low-frequency alleles of each SNP were regarded as mutant type, and the effects of the polymorphisms were evaluated using the dominant (heterozygous + homozygous mutant type vs. homozygous wild type) and recessive (homozygous mutant type vs. homozygous wild type and heterozygous) models. Family-based association analyses were performed using TDT39. A log-linear modeling approach60 was implemented to estimate the relative risks (ORs) of the maternal and fetal genotypes. The effects of maternal and fetal gene interactions were analyzed by logistic regression. LRT was implemented to test the gene-environment interaction based on case-parent triad design43. When the LRT indicated the presence of an interaction (P LRT < 0.05), the ORs and 95% CI were calculated separately for different strata of the exposure variable. Statistical results were adjusted for multiple testing using the FDR procedures reported by Benjamini et al.61.
Sample size was calculated by a power calculation method based on the noncentrality parameter for a four-df chi-squared LRT40. For each of the five SNPs with risk allele frequencies of 0.10–0.36, a sample size of 220 PE cases and 300 controls was estimated to be sufficient to detect an effect size of 1.5 in the log-linear approach, with a power of 0.90 when the significance level (α) was 0.05. LRT was performed using the Log-linear Expectation Maximization (LEM) software (examples of the LEM scripts are available at http://www.niehs.nih.gov/research/resources/software/biostatistics/lem/index.cfm ). Other statistical analyses were performed with SPSS (Version 21.0; SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA).
Electronic supplementary material
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of Yichang Maternal and Child Care Hospital, Anyang Maternal and Child Care Hospital, and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant numbers: 81172679/H2605).
Author Contributions
W.-R.Y. designed and managed the research work. Z.L., H.D., X.S., and J.Z. collected the samples and data. H.Z. and Y.-X.L. performed the experiments. H.Z. analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. W.-J.P. and W.-R.Y. improved the manuscript. The final manuscript was approved by all authors.
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Footnotes
Electronic supplementary material
Supplementary information accompanies this paper at doi:10.1038/s41598-017-05411-z
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Sibai BM. Diagnosis and management of gestational hypertension and preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102:181–192. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(03)00475-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Shennan AH, Redman C, Cooper C, Milne F. Are most maternal deaths from pre-eclampsia avoidable? Lancet. 2012;379:1686–1687. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60785-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Carty DM, Delles C, Dominiczak AF. Preeclampsia and future maternal health. J Hypertens. 2010;28:1349–1355. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e32833a39d0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bellamy L, Casas JP, Hingorani AD, Williams DJ. Pre-eclampsia and risk of cardiovascular disease and cancer in later life: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2007;335:974. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39335.385301.BE. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Chaiworapongsa T, Chaemsaithong P, Yeo L, Romero R. Pre-eclampsia part 1: current understanding of its pathophysiology. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2014;10:466–480. doi: 10.1038/nrneph.2014.102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ye C, et al. The 2011 survey on hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) in China: prevalence, risk factors, complications, pregnancy and perinatal outcomes. PLoS One. 2014;9:e100180. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Shah DM. The role of RAS in the pathogenesis of preeclampsia. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2006;8:144–152. doi: 10.1007/s11906-006-0011-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Irani RA, Xia Y. The functional role of the renin-angiotensin system in pregnancy and preeclampsia. Placenta. 2008;29:763–771. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2008.06.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ward K, et al. A molecular variant of angiotensinogen associated with preeclampsia. Nat Genet. 1993;4:59–61. doi: 10.1038/ng0593-59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.van Thiel, B. S., van der Pluijm, I., Te, R. L., Essers, J. & Danser, A. H. The renin-angiotensin system and its involvement in vascular disease. Eur J Pharmacol. 763, doi:10.1016/j.ejphar.2015.03.090 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 11.Leung PS, Tsai SJ, Wallukat G, Leung TN, Lau TK. The upregulation of angiotensin II receptor AT(1) in human preeclamptic placenta. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2001;184:95–102. doi: 10.1016/S0303-7207(01)00637-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Morgan T, Craven C, Lalouel JM, Ward K. Angiotensinogen Thr235 variant is associated with abnormal physiologic change of the uterine spiral arteries in first-trimester decidua. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;180:95–102. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70156-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Herse F, et al. Dysregulation of the circulating and tissue-based renin-angiotensin system in preeclampsia. Hypertension. 2007;49:604–611. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000257797.49289.71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Steegers EA, von Dadelszen P, Duvekot JJ, Pijnenborg R. Pre-eclampsia. Lancet. 2010;376:631–644. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60279-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Haram K, Mortensen JH, Nagy B. Genetic aspects of preeclampsia and the HELLP syndrome. J Pregnancy. 2014;2014:910751. doi: 10.1155/2014/910751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Morgan L, et al. Distortion of maternal-fetal angiotensin II type 1 receptor allele transmission in pre-eclampsia. J Med Genet. 1998;35:632–636. doi: 10.1136/jmg.35.8.632. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Takimoto E, et al. Hypertension induced in pregnant mice by placental renin and maternal angiotensinogen. Science. 1996;274:995–998. doi: 10.1126/science.274.5289.995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Morgan L, Crawshaw S, Baker PN, Broughton PF, Kalsheker N. Maternal and fetal angiotensinogen gene allele sharing in pre-eclampsia. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999;106:244–251. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08238.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Cnattingius S, Reilly M, Pawitan Y, Lichtenstein P. Maternal and fetal genetic factors account for most of familial aggregation of preeclampsia: a population-based Swedish cohort study. Am J Med Genet A. 2004;130A:365–371. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.30257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Keavney B, et al. Measured haplotype analysis of the angiotensin-I converting enzyme gene. Hum Mol Genet. 1998;7:1745–1751. doi: 10.1093/hmg/7.11.1745. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Procopciuc LM, et al. Maternal/newborn genotype contribution of the renin-angiotensin system (Met235Thr, Thr174Met, I/D-ACE, A2350G-ACE, A1166C-AT2R1, C3123A- AT2R2, 83A/G-REN) to the risk of pre-eclampsia: a Romanian study. J Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone Syst. 2011;12:539–548. doi: 10.1177/1470320311399603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Brand E, et al. Detection of putative functional angiotensinogen (AGT) gene variants controlling plasma AGT levels by combined segregation-linkage analysis. Eur J Hum Genet. 2002;10:715–723. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5200874. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Jeunemaitre X, et al. Molecular basis of human hypertension: role of angiotensinogen. Cell. 1992;71:169–180. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90275-H. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.van Geel PP, et al. Angiotensin II type 1 receptor A1166C gene polymorphism is associated with an increased response to angiotensin II in human arteries. Hypertension. 2000;35:717–721. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.35.3.717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Morgan L, et al. Functional and genetic studies of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor in pre-eclamptic and normotensive pregnant women. J Hypertens. 1997;15:1389–1396. doi: 10.1097/00004872-199715120-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Umbach DM, Weinberg CR. The use of case-parent triads to study joint effects of genotype and exposure. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2000;66:251–261. doi: 10.1086/302707. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Yang HY, et al. Impact of interaction of cigarette smoking with angiotensin-converting enzyme polymorphisms on end-stage renal disease risk in a Han Chinese population. J Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone Syst. 2015;16:203–210. doi: 10.1177/1470320313481837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kobashi G. Genetic and Environmental Factors Associated with the Development of Hypertension in Pregnancy. Journal of Epidemiology. 2006;16:1–8. doi: 10.2188/jea.16.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Kobashi G, et al. The M235T variant of the angiotensinogen gene and the body mass index are useful markers for prevention of hypertension in pregnancy: a tree-based analysis of gene-environment interaction. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2002;28:501–506. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-36690. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.George EM, Arany I. Induction of heme oxygenase-1 shifts the balance from proinjury to prosurvival in the placentas of pregnant rats with reduced uterine perfusion pressure. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2012;302:R620–R626. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00617.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Palei AC, Spradley FT, Warrington JP, George EM, Granger JP. Pathophysiology of hypertension in pre-eclampsia: a lesson in integrative physiology. Acta physiologica. 2013;208:224–233. doi: 10.1111/apha.12106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Zhou A, et al. The association of AGTR2 polymorphisms with preeclampsia and uterine artery bilateral notching is modulated by maternal BMI. Placenta. 2013;34:75–81. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2012.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Atalay MA, et al. Polymorphisms in angiotensin-converting enzyme and glutathione s-transferase genes in Turkish population and risk for preeclampsia. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2012;39:466–469. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Jenkins LD, et al. Preeclampsia risk and angiotensinogen polymorphisms M235T and AGT -217 in African American and Caucasian women. Reprod Sci. 2008;15:696–701. doi: 10.1177/1933719108316984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Li H, Ma Y, Fu Q, Wang L. Angiotensin-converting enzyme insertion/deletion (ACE I/D) and angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) gene polymorphism and its association with preeclampsia in Chinese women. Hypertens Pregnancy. 2007;26:293–301. doi: 10.1080/10641950701413676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Goddard KAB, et al. Candidate-Gene Association Study of Mothers with Pre-Eclampsia, and Their Infants, Analyzing 775 SNPs in 190 Genes. Hum Hered. 2007;63:1–16. doi: 10.1159/000097926. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Kim YJ, et al. Associations of polymorphisms of the angiotensinogen M235 polymorphism and angiotensin-converting-enzyme intron 16 insertion/deletion polymorphism with preeclampsia in Korean women. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2004;116:48–53. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2004.01.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Choi H, et al. Association of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme and Angiotensinogen Gene Polymorphisms with Preeclampsia. J Korean Med Sci. 2004;2:253–257. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2004.19.2.253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Schaid DJ. Likelihoods and TDT for the case-parents design. Genet Epidemiol. 1999;16:250–260. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2272(1999)16:3<250::AID-GEPI2>3.0.CO;2-T. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Vermeulen SH, Shi M, Weinberg CR, Umbach DM. A hybrid design: case-parent triads supplemented by control-mother dyads. Genet Epidemiol. 2009;33:136–144. doi: 10.1002/gepi.20365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Weinberg CR, Wilcox AJ, Lie RT. A log-linear approach to case-parent-triad data: assessing effects of disease genes that act either directly or through maternal effects and that may be subject to parental imprinting. Am J Hum Genet. 1998;62:969–978. doi: 10.1086/301802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Nagelkerke NJ, Hoebee B, Teunis P, Kimman TG. Combining the transmission disequilibrium test and case-control methodology using generalized logistic regression. Eur J Hum Genet. 2004;12:964–970. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Schaid DJ. Case-parents design for gene-environment interaction. Genet Epidemiol. 1999;16:261–273. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2272(1999)16:3<261::AID-GEPI3>3.0.CO;2-M. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Sethi AA, Nordestgaard BG, Tybjaerg-Hansen A. Angiotensinogen gene polymorphism, plasma angiotensinogen, and risk of hypertension and ischemic heart disease: a meta-analysis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2003;23:1269–1275. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000079007.40884.5C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Rigat B, et al. An insertion/deletion polymorphism in the angiotensin I-converting enzyme gene accounting for half the variance of serum enzyme levels. J Clin Invest. 1990;86:1343–1346. doi: 10.1172/JCI114844. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Alvi FM, Hasnain S. ACE I/D and G2350A polymorphisms in Pakistani hypertensive population of Punjab. Clin Exp Hypertens. 2009;31:471–478. doi: 10.1080/10641960902825479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Arngrimsson R, et al. Genetic and familial predisposition to eclampsia and pre-eclampsia in a defined population. Br J Obstet Gynaeco. 1990;97:762–769. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1990.tb02569.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Zhang L, Yang H, Qin H, Zhang K. Angiotensin II type I receptor A1166C polymorphism increases the risk of pregnancy hypertensive disorders: Evidence from a meta-analysis. J Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone Syst. 2014;15:131–138. doi: 10.1177/1470320312467556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Martinez-Rodriguez N, et al. Association of angiotensin II type 1-receptor gene polymorphisms with the risk of developing hypertension in Mexican individuals. J Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone Syst. 2012;13:133–140. doi: 10.1177/1470320311419175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Zhong WG, Wang Y, Zhu H, Zhao X. Meta analysis of angiotensin-converting enzyme I/D polymorphism as a risk factor for preeclampsia in Chinese women. Genet Mol Res. 2012;11:2268–2276. doi: 10.4238/2012.May.21.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Ni S, et al. AGT M235T polymorphism contributes to risk of preeclampsia: evidence from a meta-analysis. J Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone Syst. 2012;13:379–386. doi: 10.1177/1470320312440903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Zhao L, Dewan AT, Bracken MB. Association of maternal AGTR1 polymorphisms and preeclampsia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012;25:2676–2680. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2012.708370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Spratling PM, et al. Effect of an educational intervention on cardiovascular disease risk perception among women with preeclampsia. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2014;43:179–89. doi: 10.1111/1552-6909.12296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Mei-Dan E, Wiznitzer A, Sergienko R, Hallak M, Sheiner E. Prediction of Preeclampsia: Liver Function Tests During the First 20 Gestational Weeks. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013;26:250–253. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2012.733771. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Munazza B, et al. Liver Function Tests in Preeclampsia. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2011;23:3–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Gou, W. L. Special disease in pregnancy in Obstetrics and Gynecology (eds. Xie, X. & Gou, W. L.) 66–67 (People’s Medical Publishing House (In Chinese), Beijing, 2016).
- 57.Duan, T. Fetal abnormalities and multiple pregnancy in Obstetrics and Gynecology (eds. Xie, X. & Gou, W. L.) 113 (People’s Medical Publishing House (In Chinese), Beijing, 2016).
- 58.Yan W, et al. Maternal and fetal angiotensin-converting enzyme gene insertion/deletion polymorphism not associated with pregnancy-induced hypertension in Chinese women. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011;24:1119–1123. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2010.546452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Lindpaintner K, et al. A prospective evaluation of an angiotensin-converting-enzyme gene polymorphism and the risk of ischemic heart disease. N Engl J Med. 1995;332:706–711. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199503163321103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Ainsworth HF, Unwin J, Jamison DL, Cordell HJ. Investigation of maternal effects, maternal-fetal interactions and parent-of-origin effects (imprinting), using mothers and their offspring. Genet Epidemiol. 2011;35:19–45. doi: 10.1002/gepi.20547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Benjamini Y, Yekutieli D. The Control of the False Discovery Rate in Multiple Testing under Dependency. The Annals of Statistics. 2001;29:1165–1188. doi: 10.1214/aos/1013699998. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.