Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2017 Apr 13;162(8):2441–2444. doi: 10.1007/s00705-017-3349-6

Genomic characterization of bacteriophage vB_PcaP_PP2 infecting Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. carotovorum, a new member of a proposed genus in the subfamily Autographivirinae

Jeong-A Lim 1,2, Sunggi Heu 1,3, Jinwoo Park 1, Eunjung Roh 1,
PMCID: PMC5506502  PMID: 28409265

Abstract

Bacteriophage vB_PcaP_PP2 (PP2) is a novel virulent phage that infects the plant-pathogenic bacterium Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. carotovorum. PP2 phage has a 41,841-bp double-stranded DNA encoding 47 proteins, and it was identified as a member of the family Podoviridae by transmission electron microscopy. Nineteen of its open reading frames (ORFs) show homology to functional proteins, and 28 ORFs have been characterized as hypothetical proteins. PP2 phage is homologous to Cronobacter phage vB_CskP_GAP227 and Dev-CD-23823. Based on phylogenetic analysis, PP2 and its homologous bacteriophages form a new group within the subfamily Autographivirinae in the family Podoviridae, suggesting the need to establish a new genus. No lysogenic-cycle-related genes or bacterial toxins were identified.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00705-017-3349-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.


Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. carotovorum (formerly known as Erwinia carotovorum subsp. carotovora) is a Gram-negative plant-pathogenic bacterium [12]. It causes soft rot disease in various important crops, such as Chinese cabbage, potato, and lettuce, by producing plant-cell-wall-degrading enzymes. The disease occurs throughout the processing procedure, including production, distribution, and storage, and can cause great economic losses [14].

A bacteriophage is a virus that infects bacteria. Bacteriophages infect only their target bacteria by recognizing a specific receptor on the bacterial surface and destroying them within a short time [7]. Bacteriophages are not harmful to eukaryotes; therefore, they can be applied to reduce complications of disease caused by pathogenic bacteria in humans, animals, and plants. Additionally, food that is contaminated with pathogenic bacteria can be rapidly detected and controlled by bacteriophages [3, 9]. To enlarge the applicability of bacteriophages and overcome their limitations, the genome sequences of various bacteriophages have been analyzed [13]. In cases of bacteriophages infecting P. carotovorum subsp. carotovorum, the genome sequences of only a few bacteriophages have been reported [8, 10]. In this study, the genome sequence of a new bacteriophage, vB_PcaP_PP2 (PP2), which infects P. carotovorum subsp. carotovorum, was analyzed.

Bacteriophage PP2 was isolated from the soil of a Chinese-cabbage field (Pyeongchang, Korea) where soft-rot disease was occurring. By serial plaque picking, a pure bacteriophage plaque was isolated. After propagation and purification using CsCl gradient ultracentrifugation, bacteriophage PP2 was isolated. Pectobacterium isolated from Chinese-cabbage fields where soft-rot diseases had occurred were used for host range determination. The phage DNA was extracted using phenol-chloroform [19] and sequenced on a 454 Genome Sequencer FLX (Roche, Mannheim, Germany). The reads were then assembled into a complete genome sequence using Newbler v2.3 (Macrogen, Seoul, Korea). Open reading frames (ORFs) were predicted using a combination of Glimmer 3[5], GeneMarkS [4], and FgenesB software (Softberry Inc., Mount Kisco, NY). The functions of the ORFs were predicted using BlastP [2] and Pfam domain prediction. Phylogenetic analysis was performed, using MEGA6, by the neighbor-joining and maximum-likelihood methods [16]. The prediction of tRNA coding regions, lifestyle, and the presence of bacterial toxin genes was performed with the tRNAscan-SE program [17], PHACTS program [11], and BTXpred server [15], respectively.

PP2 morphology was observed by transmission electron microscopy (Fig. S1). The phage had the characteristics of a member of the family Podoviridae, with a head size of approximately 55 nm and a tail length of approximately 15 nm. It had a 41,841-bp double-stranded DNA with a G+C content of 51.62% and no predicted tRNA. It did not show homology to previously reported P. carotovorum subsp. carotovorum bacteriophages, although it was more closely related to Podoviridae phages PPWS1 and PP2 than the Siphoviridae phage My1 and the Myoviridae phages PM1 and PM2 (Fig. S2). The PP2 bacteriophage is similar to Cronobacter phage vB_CskP_GAP227 and Dev-CD-23823 in terms of its gene composition and amino acid sequence similarity (Fig. 1). Like these two phages, PP2 also contains a single-subunit RNA polymerase gene, which is required for self-replication; thus, it can be classified as a member of the subfamily Autographivirinae in the family Podoviridae [6]. Thus far, seven genera have been established within the subfamily Autographivirinae: Phikmvvirus, Kp32virus, Kp34virus, Sp6virus, Fri1virus, Pradovirus, and T7virus. It was proposed previously that vB_CskP_GAP227 and its homologous phages be grouped in a new genus within the subfamily Autographivirinae [1]. Phylogenetic analysis of amino acid sequences encoding the RNA polymerase and large terminase (DNA maturase B) could support the proposal of a new genus including PP2, vB_CskP_GAP227, and Dev-CD-23823 (Fig. 2).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Genome map of bacteriophage PP2 and comparison with homologous phages. Arrows indicate predicted open reading frames responsible for replication and metabolism (red), assembly and packaging (green), structure (blue), and lysis (yellow). Hypothetical proteins are indicated by pink arrows. The amino acid sequence similarities between the phages are indicated by gray shading

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Phylogenetic analyses of the RNA polymerase (A) and terminase large subunit (DNA maturase B) (B) sequences of bacteriophages belonging to the subfamily Autographivirinae using the neighbor-joining method. The amino acid sequences were compared using ClustalW. The percentage of replicate trees in which the associated taxa clustered together in the bootstrap test (1000 replicates) is shown next to the branches. The evolutionary distances were computed using the p-distance method, and analysis was conducted in MEGA6

Among the 47 predicted ORFs, the functions of 28 were unknown, and 19 could be categorized according to the following functions: replication and metabolism, packaging and assembly, structure, and lysis (Fig. 1 and Table S1). The first group, which includes DNA primase, helicase, ligase, nucleotidyltransferase, RNA polymerase, and exo/endonuclease is needed for replication and metabolism. Scaffolding proteins, DNA maturase, and head-tail connector proteins play a role in virion assembly by forming a procapsid, cutting monomer DNA from concatemers, and joining the head and tail. The predicted structural protein ORFs are major capsid proteins, tail tubular proteins, and tail fiber proteins. Although most genes, except for the hypothetical genes, showed high homology to two bacteriophages (vB_CskP_GAP227 and Dev-CD-23823), there was very low similarity to the tail fiber protein (PP2_040), which is associated with host specificity. PP2 can infect only P. carotovorum subsp. carotovorum and P. carotovorum subsp. brasiliensis; Cronobacter was resistant to PP2 (Table S2). Related to lysis, lytic transglycosylase, holin and endolysin were predicted. However, there was no protein homologous to spanins, which are accessory lysis proteins of bacteriophages that infect Gram-negative bacteria [18].

The lifestyle (temperate or virulent) of the PP2 bacteriophage could not be predicted using PHACTS software, which may be due to the lack of information on homologous bacteriophages in the database (data not shown). However, there was no lysogenic-cycle-related gene such as a repressor or an integrase. Therefore, we concluded that the PP2 bacteriophage has only a lytic cycle. Lytic bacteriophages have a high chance of bacteria lysis and a low possibility of virulence factor transmission between bacteria. No bacterial toxins were detected in the proteome of the PP2 bacteriophage. Therefore, it has the potential to be used as a safe and useful biocontrol agent.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Rural Development Administration (RDA) fund (PJ010921) and Post-Doc Fellowship to J,A,L, from RDA.

Footnotes

The nucleotide sequence data reported are available in the GenBank database under the accession number KX756572.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00705-017-3349-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

References

  • 1.Abbasifar R, Kropinski AM, Sabour PM, Ackermann HW, Alanis Villa A, Abbasifar A, Griffiths MW (2013) The genome of Cronobacter sakazakii bacteriophage vB_CsaP_GAP227 suggests a new genus within the Autographivirinae. Genome Announc 1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 2.Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990;215:403–410. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bai J, Kim YT, Ryu S, Lee JH. Biocontrol and rapid detection of food-borne pathogens using bacteriophages and endolysins. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:474. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Besemer J, Lomsadze A, Borodovsky M. GeneMarkS: a self-training method for prediction of gene starts in microbial genomes. Implications for finding sequence motifs in regulatory regions. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001;29:2607–2618. doi: 10.1093/nar/29.12.2607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Delcher AL, Bratke KA, Powers EC, Salzberg SL. Identifying bacterial genes and endosymbiont DNA with Glimmer. Bioinformatics. 2007;23:673–679. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Eriksson H, Maciejewska B, Latka A, Majkowska-Skrobek G, Hellstrand M, Melefors O, Wang JT, Kropinski AM, Drulis-Kawa Z, Nilsson AS. A suggested new bacteriophage genus, “Kp34likevirus”, within the Autographivirinae subfamily of Podoviridae. Viruses. 2015;7:1804–1822. doi: 10.3390/v7041804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Haq IU, Chaudhry WN, Akhtar MN, Andleeb S, Qadri I. Bacteriophages and their implications on future biotechnology: a review. Virol J. 2012;9:9. doi: 10.1186/1743-422X-9-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hirata H, Kashihara M, Horiike T, Suzuki T, Dohra H, Netsu O, Tsuyumu S (2016) Genome Sequence of Pectobacterium carotovorum Phage PPWS1, Isolated from Japanese Horseradish [Eutrema japonicum (Miq.) Koidz] showing soft-rot symptoms. Genome Announc 4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 9.Lim JA, Jee S, Lee DH, Roh E, Jung K, Oh C, Heu S. Biocontrol of Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. carotovorum using bacteriophage PP1. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013;23:1147–1153. doi: 10.4014/jmb.1304.04001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lim JA, Lee DH, Heu S. Isolation and Genomic Characterization of the T4-Like Bacteriophage PM2 Infecting Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. carotovorum. Plant Pathol J. 2015;31:83–89. doi: 10.5423/PPJ.NT.09.2014.0099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.McNair K, Bailey BA, Edwards RA. PHACTS, a computational approach to classifying the lifestyle of phages. Bioinformatics. 2012;28:614–618. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Nabhan S, De Boer SH, Maiss E, Wydra K. Taxonomic relatedness between Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. carotovorum, Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. odoriferum and Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. brasiliense subsp. nov. J Appl Microbiol. 2012;113:904–913. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2012.05383.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Reyes A, Semenkovich NP, Whiteson K, Rohwer F, Gordon JI. Going viral: next-generation sequencing applied to phage populations in the human gut. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2012;10:607–617. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Roh E, Lee S, Lee Y, Ra D, Choi J, Moon E, Heu S. Diverse Antibacterial activity of Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. carotovorum isolated in Korea. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2009;19:42–50. doi: 10.4014/jmb.0902.065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Saha S, Raghava GP. BTXpred: prediction of bacterial toxins. In Silico Biol. 2007;7:405–412. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol. 1987;4:406–425. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Schattner P, Brooks AN, Lowe TM. The tRNAscan-SE, snoscan and snoGPS web servers for the detection of tRNAs and snoRNAs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33:W686–689. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Summer EJ, Berry J, Tran TA, Niu L, Struck DK, Young R. Rz/Rz1 lysis gene equivalents in phages of Gram-negative hosts. J Mol Biol. 2007;373:1098–1112. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.08.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Wilcox SA, Toder R, Foster JW. Rapid isolation of recombinant lambda phage DNA for use in fluorescence in situ hybridization. Chromosome Res. 1996;4:397–398. doi: 10.1007/BF02257276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials


Articles from Archives of Virology are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES