Abstract
Background
Orthostatic hypotension (OH) is a sustained fall in blood pressure on standing that can cause symptoms of organ hypoperfusion. OH is associated with increased morbidity and mortality and leads to a significant number of hospital admissions, particularly in the elderly (233 per 100,000 patients >75 years of age in the United States). OH can result from volume depletion, blood loss, large varicose veins, medications, or because of defective activation of sympathetic nerves and reduced norepinephrine release on standing (i.e., neurogenic OH).
Methods and Findings
A literature review shows that neurogenic OH is a frequent and disabling problem in patients with synucleinopathies such as Parkinson's disease, multiple system atrophy, and pure autonomic failure, and it is commonly associated with supine hypertension. Several pharmacological and nonpharmacological therapeutic options are available.
Conclusions
Here we review the epidemiology, diagnosis, and management of neurogenic OH, and provide an algorithm for its treatment, emphasizing the importance of removing aggravating factors, implementing nonpharmacologic measures, and selecting appropriate pharmacological treatments.
Keywords: autonomic failure, droxidopa, multiple system atrophy, Parkinson's disease, supine hypertension, synucleinopathies
Orthostatic hypotension (OH) is a sustained fall in blood pressure (BP) on standing. The current definition of OH, based on expert consensus,1 is a fall of at least 20 mm Hg in systolic BP or 10 mm Hg in diastolic BP within 3 minutes of standing or upright tilt.
OH can impair perfusion to organs above the heart, most notably the brain, resulting in symptoms of tissue hypoperfusion. Symptoms can be very disabling, can have a profound impact on a patient's quality of life, and can increase morbidity and mortality.2, 3
OH is a frequent problem in the general population, particularly in the frail elderly, and it can result from a variety of medical conditions, such as intravascular volume depletion, blood pooling (ie, varicose veins4), severe anemia, antihypertensive therapies, and physical deconditioning. In theses cases, OH usually improves dramatically or resolves after the underlying cause is treated.
In a minority of patients, OH occurs because of reduced norepinephrine release from postganglionic sympathetic nerves, leading to defective vasoconstriction when in the upright posture.1 This is referred to as neurogenic OH (nOH)5 and occurs frequently in patients with neurodegenerative disorders caused by abnormal accumulation of α‐synuclein (i. e., synucleinopathies) in the nervous system, such as Parkinson's disease (PD), dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), multiple system atrophy (MSA), and pure autonomic failure (PAF).5, 6
Complicating nOH management is arterial hypertension when supine (SH), which occurs in ≤70% of patients with nOH.7, 8
Here we review the epidemiology, evaluation, and management of nOH, with emphasis on patients with PD and other synucleinopathies, summarize the nonpharmacological and pharmacological treatment strategies, and provide practical advice on the management of patients with this debilitating condition.
Epidemiology and Pathophysiology
The prevalence of OH in the general population increases with age and varies according to the clinical setting.1, 3, 9 The overall prevalence of OH in patients >65 is ~20%.10 In the Cardiovascular Health study, the prevalence of OH was 18% in subjects age ≥65 years, although only 2% were symptomatic.10 OH is more common in the elderly, at least in part because of the frequent use of antihypertensive medications.11 Drugs frequently associated with OH are vasodilators (eg, nitrates, calcium channel blockers, α adrenergic blockers), tricyclic antidepressants, opioids, and alcohol. OH is associated with increased morbidity, particularly syncope and falls,12, 13 and with incident coronary artery disease, stroke, and heart failure.14, 15 OH is a common reason for, or contributor to, hospitalization in elderly patients. OH is present in 25% of patients evaluated in the emergency department for syncope.16 The estimate of OH‐related hospitalization is 36 per 100,000 adults, and the OH hospitalization rate can be as high as 233 per 100,000 patients >75 years of age, with a median length of stay of 3 days and an overall in‐hospital mortality rate of 0.9%.9 In inpatient series, the prevalence of OH in elderly patients is as high as 60%.17, 18 OH is an independent predictor of mortality.19, 20, 21
When OH occurs in middle‐aged patients in the absence of volume depletion or drug effects, it is usually neurogenic, which is a result of impaired norepinephrine release from sympathetic postganglionic neurons. This occurs in approximately one third of patients with OH22 and is a common problem in patients with PD, DLB, and MSA, as well as in diabetic autonomic neuropathy, autoimmune autonomic neuropathy, and rare genetic disorders (eg, dopamine beta‐hydroxylase deficiency). Neurogenic OH (nOH) is best understood as a neurotransmitter disorder. In patients with PD, dopamine deficiency in the nigrostriatal pathway causes the motor abnormalities, whereas impaired release of the neurotransmitter norepinephrine from sympathetic postganglionic neurons causes OH (Fig. 1). In contrast to regular OH, nOH is an orphan condition as it affects fewer than 200,000 people in the United States, although the true prevalence of nOH may be underestimated, as BP is not always measured in the upright posture.
An estimated 30 to 50% of patients with PD have nOH.23 The prevalence of nOH in PD increases with age and disease duration.8 Although the prevalence of nOH in PD is relatively high, not all patients exhibit symptoms of organ hypoperfusion. In a study of 210 patients with PD, only 16% of patients had symptomatic nOH.8 In that study, symptomatic nOH was associated with an upright mean BP <75 mm Hg. This value (a standing mean BP <75 mm Hg) had a sensitivity of 97% and a specificity of 98% for detecting symptomatic nOH, and it seems to be the lower limit of cerebrovascular autoregulation in patients with PD and nOH, below which patients develop symptoms of cerebral hypoperfusion. Patients fulfilling criteria for nOH, who also had SH, were less likely to develop symptomatic nOH after standing for 3 minutes (Fig. S1).
For MSA, the criteria for nOH are more stringent (a sustained fall of 30 mm Hg in systolic or 15 mm Hg in diastolic BP).1 Even according to these criteria, nOH is extremely frequent, although not universal, in MSA, with an estimated prevalence of 70 to 80%.24, 25
Interestingly, nOH can be a feature of the premotor stage in patients with both PD and DLB as well as MSA.6, 25, 26 Therefore, patients with nOH without significant motor or cognitive deficits, and therefore labeled as PAF, need close follow‐up to detect early signs of phenoconversion to a manifest central nervous system (CNS) synucleinopathy.6
Despite similarities in their clinical presentation, the physiopathology of nOH in PD/DLB and PAF is different than that in MSA. In patients with MSA, α‐synuclein‐driven neurodegeneration occurs in central autonomic neurons, whereas peripheral autonomic nerves are mostly spared. As a result, patients with MSA usually have intact postganglionic sympathetic fibers and preserved residual sympathetic tone. In contrast, postganglionic sympathetic fibers are severely affected in patients with PD, DLB, and PAF. These differences are reflected biochemically with near normal plasma norepinephrine levels in patients with MSA but lower levels in those with PD with nOH or PAF.27 These differences also explain the different pressor responses to norepinephrine enhancing medications (eg, droxidopa, atomoxetine), as will be later discussed.
Approach to the Patient with Orthostatic Hypotension
OH can be symptomatic or asymptomatic. Typical symptoms of OH are lightheadedness, dizziness, blurry vision, and, when the fall in BP is pronounced, loss of consciousness and postural tone (syncope). Symptoms occur only when standing, less frequently when sitting, and they abate when lying down. Patients with OH may also complain of generalized weakness, fatigue, leg buckling, occipital headache, neck and shoulder (“coat hanger”) discomfort, and shortness of breath resulting from ventilation/perfusion mismatch in the apical lung areas.
Patients with chronic nOH resulting from neurological disorders usually tolerate very low BPs with only mild or no symptoms at all, but syncope can occur with added orthostatic stressors (eg, large carbohydrate‐rich meals, alcohol intake, very warm weather, dehydration, and antihypertensive treatment).
Not all patients with nOH are symptomatic. Symptoms of cerebral hypoperfusion emerge when BP standing falls below the lower limit of the cerebral autoregulatory range. As mentioned previously, in patients with PD, this usually occurs when mean BP standing is <75 mm Hg, which corresponds to ~90/60 mm Hg (systolic/diastolic) at the heart level.8
Symptoms of OH typically disappear after the patient resumes the sitting or lying position because cerebral blood flow is restored to levels above the lower limit of autoregulatory capacity (Fig. 2). The chronic nature of nOH allows remarkable adaptive changes in cerebral autoregulatory mechanisms.28 Indeed, patients with nOH are frequently able to tolerate wide swings in BPs and often remain conscious at pressures that would otherwise induce syncope in healthy subjects.29
Symptoms of nOH can be nonspecific, including fatigue and difficultly concentrating, and they might sometimes mimic a levodopa (l‐dopa) “off” motor state in PD patients. In these cases, the diagnosis of nOH may be missed unless BP is measured in the standing position. Conversely, it is important to realize that in patients with PD, postural lightheadedness mimicking nOH may be caused by abnormal postural reflexes, vestibular deficits, or orthostatic tremor.30
In contrast to vasovagal (neurally mediated) syncope, syncope in nOH occurs without signs of autonomic activation such as diaphoresis, tachycardia, nausea, or abdominal discomfort. Following syncope, as soon as they resume the supine position, patients with nOH usually recover quickly and may be unaware of the event. Patients report that symptom severity varies from day to day and fluctuates throughout the day. The morning hours tend to be most difficult, as OH symptoms are aggravated by intravascular volume loss overnight.31 Meals, particularly carbohydrate‐rich, lead to splanchnic vasodilatation and postprandial hypotension (ie, fall in BP within 2 h of eating). The severity of postprandial hypotension is directly related to insulin release.32 This has therapeutic implications, as will be later discussed. Physical inactivity and prolonged bed rest are common in patients with nOH. This leads to cardiovascular deconditioning further worsening the fall in BP and increasing symptoms leading to a vicious cycle.
Patients at high risk should be routinely screened for OH, even in the absence of symptoms. These include patients with a synucleinopathy (PD/DLB, MSA, or PAF), elderly subjects (>70 years old), or on multiple medications.
Diagnosis of Neurogenic Orthostatic Hypotension
The diagnosis of OH requires BP readings while supine and upright, either during active standing or during a tilt‐table test, to determine the presence of a sustained orthostatic fall of at least 20 mm Hg systolic or 10 mm Hg diastolic BP. BP and heart rate should be measured after the patient has been supine for several minutes and after standing still (or passively tilted) for 1 to 3 minutes. The magnitude of the BP fall and symptom severity vary at different times of the day; thus it may be necessary to retest the patient in the morning when the orthostatic fall in pressure is more pronounced or after a meal if the history suggest postprandial hypotension.
The changes in heart rate on standing help to determine whether the OH is neurogenic in origin. In patients with nOH, reduced sympathetic innervation causes the heart rate to increase much less than expected considering the magnitude of the BP fall.2, 33 Marked increases in heart rate suggest that the OH is non‐neurogenic. Ascertaining the diagnosis of nOH may require autonomic testing including the BP response to the Valsalva maneuver and plasma norepinephrine levels while supine and standing. During the Valsalva maneuver, patients with nOH fail to show the classical BP “overshoot” after release of the strain (phase 4) (Fig. S2). An increase in plasma norepinephrine of less than 100% after 5 to 10 minutes of standing suggests defective baroreflex‐mediated sympathetic activation and a diagnosis of nOH (Table 1).
Table 1.
Non‐neurogenic Orthostatic Hypotension | Neurogenic Orthostatic Hypotension | |
---|---|---|
Frequency | Frequent (particularly in the elderly) | Rare (<200,000 in the United States) |
Onset | Variable | Usually chronic (acute or subacute in immune‐mediated neuropathies and ganglionopathies) |
Causes |
Intravascular volume loss (eg, dehydration, anemia) Blood pooling (eg, large varicose veins, skeletal muscle atrophy) Advanced heart failure Adrenal insufficiency Physical deconditioning Antihypertensive medications |
Defective norepinephrine release from sympathetic postganglionic nerves on standing up |
Prognosis | Resolves when underlying cause is corrected | Chronic disorder |
Sympathetic tone | Increased | Low or absent |
Increase in heart rate on standing | Pronounced | Mild or absent |
Blood pressure overshoot (phase 4) in Valsalva maneuver | Present | Absent |
Increase in plasma norepinephrine levels on standing | Normal or enhanced (at least ×2) | Reduced or absent (less than ×2) |
Other symptoms of autonomic failure | No |
Constipation Erectile dysfunction (men) Urinary abnormalities Sweating abnormalities |
Concomitant neurological deficits | None (or if present, they are not related to OH) |
None Parkinsonism Cerebellar signs Cognitive impairment Sensory neuropathy |
Ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) can assist in the diagnosis and management of nOH.34 Affected patients typically have a reversal of the normal circadian BP pattern with higher BP during the night when the patient is supine in bed than during the day. Nocturnal SH causes pressure natriuresis with exaggerated sodium and water loss causing overnight depletion of intravascular volume, which worsens OH in the morning. ABPM and a detailed diary of activities are also useful to tailor specifically the use of short‐acting pressor agents only at times when OH is severe in patients who may remain seated for long periods during the day or are wheelchair bound.
Some patients with PD can experience symptoms suggesting OH, but neither a significant fall in BP nor reduced cerebral perfusion on standing can be documented during office visits. In these cases, ABPM, a high‐calorie challenge, and autonomic testing are all normal. This has been described as “inebriation‐like syndrome,” and its pathophysiology is uncertain.30 A misdiagnosis of nOH can lead to unnecessary treatment with pressor agents and can increase the risk of side effects.
Management of Neurogenic Orthostatic Hypotension
The goal of treatment is not to normalize standing BP, but to reduce symptom burden so as to improve quality of life. Consensus guidelines for the treatment of nOH are currently lacking, and there are no long‐term studies analyzing the impact of treatment on survival, falls, or quality of life.
A noteworthy percentage of patients with nOH also have SH, which poses a difficult therapeutic challenge. In a multicenter study including 210 patients with PD from the United States and Europe, 44% had a supine BP >140/90 mm Hg.8 Similar results (45% prevalence of SH) were found in a sample from Japan of 72 patients with PD.35 Another study found that 71% of patients with PD had absent or reversed nocturnal BP dipping, as measured by ABPM, which is another way of quantifying SH.7
Drugs that can increase BP while in the upright position can worsen SH. Therefore, pharmacological treatment of nOH requires careful consideration of the potential risks and actual benefits.
The steps in management include: (1) correcting aggravating factors, (2) implementing nonpharmacological measures, and (3) drug therapies (Fig. 3).
Correction of Aggravating Factors
Discontinuation of Hypotensive Drugs
Drugs that reduce intravascular volume, induce vasodilatation, or block the release or activity of norepinephrine at the neurovascular junction exacerbate OH and worsen symptoms. Common offenders include diuretics, α‐blockers (prescribed for benign prostatic hypertrophy), phosphodiesterase‐5 inhibitors such as sildenafil (for erectile dysfunction), nitrates, centrally acting α2‐agonists such as clonidine, calcium‐channel blockers, beta‐blockers, and tricyclic antidepressants. l‐dopa and dopamine agonists might also lower BP, and a dose adjustment may be considered based on an individual risk–benefit assessment. Conversely, angiotensin‐converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are infrequently associated with OH.11, 15, 20, 36
Correction of Anemia and Vitamin Deficiencies
Patients with nOH have an increased incidence of anemia of chronic disease.37 Anemia worsens OH by reducing blood viscosity and oxygen‐carrying capacity. Interestingly, because hemoglobin scavenges nitric oxide, a powerful vasodilator,38 it is possible that nitric oxide‐mediated mechanisms worsen vasodilation in anemic patients with nOH, as it does in other disorders,39 although this remains to be proven. Anemia should be investigated and treated appropriately. Small case series show that raising red cell mass with recombinant erythropoietin therapy lessens the fall in BP on standing.40 Vitamin B12 deficiency (<250 pg/mL with elevated methylmalonic acid levels) can also cause or aggravate OH and should be corrected.41
Nonpharmacological Management
Nonpharmacological measures and patient education are key to the successful management of nOH. Patients should understand the effects of posture on BP and should learn physical maneuvers to raise BP.
Volume Expansion
Intravascular volume depletion reduces circulating blood volume and worsens the fall in BP on standing. Many elderly patients are chronically volume depleted.42 Patients should be aware of the diuretic effects of caffeine and alcohol, which are also vasodilators. Similarly, patients should avoid sugary beverages (eg, bottled juices, sodas) because of the hypotensive effects of high‐glycemic index carbohydrates.32
Volume expansion with salt and water is necessary, and fluid intake should be 2 to 2.5 L of water per day. Patients should be encouraged to increase salt intake by adding 1 to 2 teaspoons of salt to a healthy diet. Other patients prefer using salt tablets (eg, 0.5 g or 1.0 g tablets) but they may cause abdominal discomfort.
In patients with nOH, drinking half a liter of water (16 oz. or 1 pint) produces a marked increase in BP.43 This can be used as a rescue measure because the pressor effect is quick; the increase in BP occurs within 5 to 10 minutes and peaks at around 30 minutes, but it is short‐lived. The increase in BP is thought to be caused by the induction of hypo‐osmolality in the portal vein43 triggering a spinal sympathetic reflex,44 although other mechanisms, such as aquaporin‐1 regulation,45 might be involved.
Lifestyle, Physical Activity, and Meals
Hot and humid environments exacerbate symptoms of nOH. A hot shower or sitting in a sauna causes skin vasodilatation and should be avoided because the normal compensatory splanchnic vasoconstriction that maintains BP is lacking in patients with these conditions.
Even short periods of bed rest worsen nOH. Symptomatic burden can quickly lead to a reluctance to stand up and the avoidance of physical activity. Physical immobility and skeletal muscle loss worsen the severity of OH, which leads to a “vicious cycle” of deconditioning (Fig. S3).2 Exercise is therefore important and should be performed in the recumbent or seated position, for example, using a stationary bicycle or a rowing machine, if exercising upright is not tolerated. Exercise in a pool is ideal, as the hydrostatic pressure of water counteracts the gravity‐induced fall in BP and increases orthostatic tolerance markedly. Importantly, patients should be extremely careful when exiting the pool, as the sudden decrease of hydrostatic pressure can contribute to venous pooling and a symptomatic drop in BP.
Eating results in blood pooling within the splanchnic circulation.46 Normally, increases in sympathetic activity compensate for this, producing vasoconstriction. In patients with nOH, however, vasoconstrictor nerve activity is deficient and many patients become severely hypotensive within 2 h of eating.1, 47 Postprandial hypotension is more pronounced after a carbohydrate‐rich meal, as insulin release is a contributing factor. Alcohol is also a powerful vasodilator and should be reserved for the evening, in advance of lying supine.
Physical Countermaneuvers
Physical countermaneuvers are helpful for managing nOH. Time should be spent making certain that patients understand the effect of gravitational fluid shifts on BP and orthostatic symptoms. They should be instructed to change positions gradually, and to sit briefly before standing. Patients should be made aware that Valsalva‐like maneuvers (straining with closed glottis) produce an abrupt and frequently severe fall in BP and should be avoided. Straining during bowel movements is a common cause of syncope, hence constipation must be treated aggressively. Maneuvers such as leg crossing, standing on tiptoes, and buttock clenching effectively increase venous return, raise BP, and lessen orthostatic symptoms.48
Compression Stockings and Abdominal Binders
Splanchnic venous pooling is a major hemodynamic determinant of OH. Compression stockings apply counterpressure to the lower limbs and abdomen, reducing venous pooling and capillary filtration.49 A high‐waist stocking that produces at least 15 to 20 mm Hg compression is an effective way to increase venous return. Patients with movement disorders struggle to put the stockings on, which limits their usefulness in everyday life. Elastic abdominal binders are a good alternative.50, 51 An abdominal binder that was developed inflates automatically only on standing and provides sustained splanchnic venous compression (40 mm Hg), and it showed promising results in patients with nOH.52
Sleep with the Head of the Bed Raised
Supine hypertension (SH) is frequent in patients with nOH. It is a side effect of antihypotensive treatment but it also occurs in untreated patients. The pathophysiology of SH in patients with autonomic failure is not well understood. In patients with MSA, residual sympathetic neurovascular tone may contribute to SH. In contrast, SH in patients with PAF and PD has a mechanism other than increased sympathetic outflows, which is yet to be fully identified.53, 54
Managing SH in patients with nOH can be challenging. During daytime, avoiding the supine position is the best treatment. If patients need to rest, they should sit in a reclining chair with the feet on the floor. During the night, tilting the bed at least 6 to 9 inches to achieve a 30‐degree angle (so that the patient sleeps with his/her head and torso above his/her legs) lowers BP.55 This is best accomplished with an electric bed or an electric mattress, rather than just minimally raising the head of the patient with extra pillows. Lowering BP during the night reduces the exaggerated nocturnal diuresis and natriuresis characteristic of these patients, therefore reducing the overnight fluid loss and improving OH in the morning. The use of pressor agents should be avoided before bedtime. Other nonpharmacological measures such as eating carbohydrate snacks or drinking a glass of wine before bedtime also contribute to decreased nocturnal SH.
Antihypertensive drugs may be necessary in patients with severe nocturnal SH that persists after nonpharmacological measures, particularly if they already have end‐organ target damage. (eg, renal failure).31 When antihypertensive drugs are prescribed, patients should be warned about the increased risk of hypotension and falls when they rise at night to urinate. In these cases, the use of a urinal or bedside commode should be encouraged.
Pharmacological Management
Although nonpharmacological methods are very effective when performed properly, many patients with nOH still require pharmacological treatment to improve symptoms. Two complementary strategies are used: (1) Expanding intravascular volume with the synthetic mineralocorticoid fludrocortisone, and (2) Increasing peripheral vascular resistance with the pressor agents midodrine or droxidopa. Selection of one or the other or both depends on the specific features and needs of each patient. Fludrocortisone can be combined with midodrine or droxidopa. No studies have directly compared midodrine and droxidopa, so whether one exerts more symptomatic relief than the other is unknown.
All available drugs that raise BP in the standing position also raise BP in the supine position, therefore increasing the risk of worsening SH. Although there are no specific data on cardio‐ and cerebrovascular events induced by SH in patients with nOH, treating physicians should be aware of this potential side effect. Before beginning treatment with fludrocortisone, midodrine, or droxidopa, the patient's medication should be carefully reviewed.
Combination therapy of agents that increase BP (eg, fludrocortisone, ephedrine, midodrine, droxidopa, and triptans) increases the risk of SH.
Patients should be instructed to avoid the supine position during the day, to sleep with the head of the bed raised 30 degrees, and to ensure that they take their final dose of droxidopa or midodrine at least 4 h before bedtime. Droxidopa or midodrine should be reduced and, if necessary, discontinued if severe SH persists. BP should be rechecked supine at a 30‐degree angle if increased doses are required. Safety in patients with BP higher than 180 mm Hg at a 30‐degree angle has not been established, as these patients were excluded from the clinical trials that led to drug approval.
Fludrocortisone
Fludrocortisone (9α‐fluorocortisol) is a synthetic mineralocorticoid that increases renal sodium and water reabsorption, therefore expanding intravascular volume and increasing supine, sitting, and standing BP.
Although not approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for this indication, fludrocortisone is often prescribed for the treatment of nOH. Because mineralocorticoid receptor activation in the kidney triggers inflammation and fibrosis and may have a direct nephrotoxic effect leading to a faster decline in renal function and hypertension,56 fludrocortisone should be used with extreme caution in the treatment of OH, and the dosage should not be higher than 0.1 or 0.2 mg/day. Higher dosages are rarely more effective but amplify side effects.
Clinical effects of fludrocortisone usually require 1 to 2 weeks of treatment. Frequent side effects include SH, hypokalemia, and ankle edema.57 Experimental data suggest that fludrocortisone enhances the pressor effect of norepinephrine and angiotensin II. Long‐term use exacerbates SH and end‐organ target damage,56 including left ventricular hypertrophy58 and renal failure.56 To reduce the risk of hypokalemia, patients taking fludrocortisone should be instructed to eat potassium‐rich foods or to take potassium supplements (potassium chloride 20 mEq daily).
Midodrine
Midodrine is an oral prodrug converted peripherally into the active metabolite desglymidodrine, an α‐1‐adrenoceptor agonist that constricts arteriolar and venous vasculature producing an increase in BP. Midodrine was approved by the U.S. FDA in 1996 for the treatment of symptomatic OH based on clinical trials showing an increase in systolic BP after standing for 1 minute.59, 60, 61 Trials were randomized, double blind, and parallel‐design, and they enrolled patients with OH of different etiologies with supine‐to‐standing fall of systolic BP of at least 15 mm Hg accompanied by at least moderate dizziness/lightheadedness. A phase IV randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial confirmed that midodrine also improves symptoms of OH.62
Administration of midodrine raises standing, sitting, and supine systolic and diastolic BP in patients with nOH. Standing systolic BP increases by 10 mm Hg to 30 mm Hg 1 h after a 10‐mg dose of midodrine, with some effect persisting for 2 to 3 h. Treatment should begin with a 2.5‐ or 5‐mg dose, which can then be increased up to 10 mg to be taken up to 3 times a day.
As with other pressor agents, SH is common with midodrine therapy, hence patients should not take midodrine less than 3 to 4 h before bedtime. Other reported side effects are piloerection (“goose bumps”), itching of the scalp, and urinary retention. Midodrine has no effect on heart rate as it does not stimulate cardiac beta‐adrenergic receptors and, owing to its poor diffusion across the blood–brain barrier, it has no CNS side effects.63
Droxidopa
Droxidopa (L‐threo‐3,4‐dihydroxyphenyl‐serine or L‐DOPS) is a synthetic amino acid, which, after oral administration, is converted to the naturally occurring sympathetic neurotransmitter norepinephrine.64 Droxidopa is decarboxylated to norepinephrine by the enzyme aromatic amino‐acid decarboxylase (AAAD), which is the same enzyme the converts l‐dopa to dopamine. AAAD is ubiquitously expressed throughout the body.
The mechanism of action of droxidopa is not completely understood. Norepinephrine production after droxidopa administration occurs in neuronal and non‐neuronal tissues. Thus, patients with nOH and extensive degeneration of sympathetic neurons (such as those with PAF, PD, or DLB) retain the ability to convert droxidopa into norepinephrine and thereby increase their BP.65 Droxidopa may also convert into norepinephrine within sympathetic terminals and the newly synthesized norepinephrine is then released as a neurotransmitter on activation of sympathetic neurons.
Droxidopa has been approved in Japan since 1989 for the treatment of nOH in PD, MSA, and familial amyloid polyneuropathy.66, 67, 68, 69 The U.S. FDA approved droxidopa in 2014 for the treatment of orthostatic dizziness, lightheadedness, or “feeling about to faint” in adult patients with symptomatic nOH associated with PD, MSA, PAF, dopamine β‐hydroxylase deficiency, and nondiabetic autonomic neuropathy, all disorders characterized by defective norepinephrine release from sympathetic nerves on standing.5 The FDA approved droxidopa, for short‐term use, based on the results of three phase‐III clinical trials.70, 71, 72, 73 Clinical experience with droxidopa shows that it is safe and well tolerated. The most commonly observed adverse reactions were headache, dizziness, nausea, and hypertension.
Droxidopa Dosage Selection
Peak plasma concentrations of droxidopa are reached by 1 to 4 h (mean of approximately 3 h) after oral administration. In clinical trials, droxidopa was taken three times daily: on arising in the morning, at noon, and in the late afternoon at least 3 h before bedtime to reduce the risk of SH during sleep. Dosages ranged from 100 mg to 600 mg three times/day.
Because the pressor effect of droxidopa varies among patients, a titration procedure supervised by a clinician is recommended. BP is measured in the 30‐degree supine position and standing, and the patient is asked to grade his symptoms. Then, 100 mg of droxidopa is administered, and, 1.5 to 2 h later, BP measurements are repeated and the patient is asked again about symptoms. If the patient does not experience full symptomatic relief, and SH is not pronounced, he/she may receive 200 mg. The procedure is repeated until the optimal dose is identified or until the maximum recommended dose (600 mg three times/day) is reached.
Although in the pivotal phase III clinical trials, patients took droxidopa three times daily, clinical experience indicates that the dosage should be tailored to each patient's needs considering the periods of time when he/she is going to be active or inactive. For instance, it is reasonable to administer a single morning dose of droxidopa and to skip the afternoon and evening dosages for a patient with MSA and reduced mobility who remains active for only a few hours in the morning when taking a shower, cooking breakfast, or going to physical therapy. Other patients may take droxidopa twice daily only, or they might take a higher dose in the morning and then lower doses during the afternoon and evening, depending on their daily activities.
Some patients with nOH do not respond to droxidopa. A study showed that, in patients with nOH, lower resting plasma norepinephrine levels are associated with a greater pressor response to droxidopa.74 This response is probably related to the degree of denervation supersensitivity. Therefore, supine norepinephrine levels in plasma might be useful to predict appropriate dosing of droxidopa. AMBM is useful to evaluate the BP profile after initiating treatment with droxidopa.75
Does Carbidopa Block the Effect of Droxidopa?
Inhibition of AAAD with high‐dose carbidopa can abolish the pressor effect of droxidopa by preventing its peripheral conversion to norepinephrine. This was demonstrated in early studies76 using a 200‐mg single dose of carbidopa administered 30 minutes before droxidopa. Because in clinical practice the dose of carbidopa in patients with PD treated with l‐dopa is lower than 200 mg, carbidopa appears not to block the pressor effect of droxidopa significantly. Dopamine agonists, amantadine derivatives, and MAO‐B inhibitors did not affect the pressor effect of droxidopa. Although no dedicated studies have been performed, norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (eg, venlafaxine) and adrenergic agonists (eg, midodrine) may potentiate the pressor effect of droxidopa and should be used with caution.
Other Medications
Pyridostigmine, an inhibitor of cholinesterase, the enzyme that catalyzes the hydrolysis of acetylcholine and terminates its action, potentiates cholinergic neurotransmission in autonomic ganglia, both sympathetic and parasympathetic. A double‐blind study showed that pyridostimine can increase, on average, 4 mm Hg in systolic BP.77 The combination of 5 mg midodrine with 60 mg pyridostigmine was slightly more effective than pyridostigmine alone.
Erythropoietin (25–50 units/kg, subcutaneous, 3 times a week) in conjunction with iron supplements may be beneficial, especially in patients with nOH who have anemia.40
Atomoxetine (10 or 18 mg) blocks the reuptake of norepinephrine by inhibiting the norepinephrine transporter (NET) and can be helpful to increase BP in some patients with nOH.78 In normal subjects, atomoxetine has little effect on BP because the peripheral effects of NET inhibition that result in noradrenergic vasoconstriction are counteracted by the increase in brain norepinephrine, which reduces sympathetic outflow. In patients with autonomic failure and intact postganglionic sympathetic noradrenergic fibers (ie, MSA), only the peripheral vasoconstriction is apparent. This translates to a significant pressor effect of atomoxetine in MSA, but not in PD, DLB, or PAF.27 A work including 101 patients with nOH who were treated with atomoxetine showed that higher supine baseline norepinephrine levels predicted a greater symptomatic improvement of orthostatic symptoms.79 The long‐term safety and efficacy of atomoxetine in nOH is being currently assessed in a U.S. FDA‐sponsored clinical trial.80
The long‐term safety and efficacy of these approaches have not been determined. Figure 4 summarizes the mechanism of action of drugs used in patients with nOH.
Conclusions
nOH is a disabling disorder that occurs frequently in patients with PD and other synucleinopathies. Mildly to moderately affected patients need a combination of nonpharmacological and pharmacological therapies, that is, the synthetic mineralocorticoid fludrocortisone and the pressor agents midodrine or droxidopa. Severely affected patients are unable to stand except for a few seconds, making it impossible to perform even simple activities of daily living. The risk of falls and injuries is increased, and patients can become socially isolated because of the burden of symptoms. In these severe cases of nOH, success with available agents is only partial, and many patients continue to suffer severe symptoms. Exercise becomes intolerable, which inevitably leads to physical deconditioning and muscle atrophy, which, in turn, worsen the fall in BP. Despite its importance, there is a paucity of treatment options for this condition; the most recently available is droxidopa. New treatment options are needed.
Author Roles
1. Research Project: A. Conception, B. Organization, C. Execution; 2. Statistical Analysis: A. Design, B. Execution, C. Review and Critique; 3. Manuscript: A. Writing of the first draft, B. Review and Critique.
J.‐A.P.: 1A, 2A, 3A, 3B
H.K.: 1A, 2A, 3A, 3B
Disclosures
Ethical Compliance Statement: We confirm that we have read the Journal's position on issues involved in ethical publication and affirm that this work is consistent with those guidelines.
Funding Sources and Conflicts of Interest: This work was funded by grants from the National Institutes of Health (U54‐NS065736‐01), and the Dysautonomia Foundation.
Financial Disclosures for the previous 12 months: J.‐A.P. receives research support from The Dysautonomia Foundation, Inc., the MSA Coalition, the National Institutes of Health (U54‐NS065736‐01), the Michael J. Fox Foundation, and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. He has received compensation as a consultant/advisory board member for Lundbeck.
H.K. receives research support from the National Institutes of Health (U54NS065736 [PI]) 1U01NS078025‐01, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FD‐R‐3731‐01 [PI]), the Michael J. Fox Foundation, and the Dysautonomia Foundation, Inc. He has received compensation as a consultant/advisory board member for Lundbeck, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, and Astra Zeneca.
Supporting information
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Lucy Norcliffe‐Kaufmann for Figure. 1 and Figure. 2.
Relevant disclosures and conflicts of interest are listed at the end of this article.
References
- 1. Freeman R, Wieling W, Axelrod FB, et al. Consensus statement on the definition of orthostatic hypotension, neurally mediated syncope and the postural tachycardia syndrome. Clin Auton Res 2011;21:69–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Freeman R. Clinical practice: neurogenic orthostatic hypotension. N Engl J Med 2008;358:615–624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Masaki KH, Schatz IJ, Burchfiel CM, et al. Orthostatic hypotension predicts mortality in elderly men: the Honolulu Heart Program. Circulation 1998;98:2290–2295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Arenander E. Hemodynamic effects of varicose veins and results of radical surgery. Acta Chir Scand Suppl 1960; 260 Suppl :1–76. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Kaufmann H, Biaggioni I. Autonomic failure in neurodegenerative disorders. Semin Neurol 2003;23:351–363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Kaufmann H, Norcliffe‐Kaufmann L, Palma JA, et al. The natural history of pure autonomic failure: a U.S. prospective cohort. Ann Neurol 207;81:287–297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Berganzo K, Diez‐Arrola B, Tijero B, et al. Nocturnal hypertension and dysautonomia in patients with Parkinson's disease: are they related? J Neurol 2013;260:1752–1756. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Palma JA, Gomez‐Esteban JC, Norcliffe‐Kaufmann L, et al. Orthostatic hypotension in Parkinson disease: how much you fall or how low you go? Mov Disord 2015;30:639–645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Shibao C, Grijalva CG, Raj SR, Biaggioni I, Griffin MR. Orthostatic hypotension‐related hospitalizations in the United States. Am J Med 2007;120:975–980. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Rutan GH, Hermanson B, Bild DE, Kittner SJ, LaBaw F, Tell GS. Orthostatic hypotension in older adults. The Cardiovascular Health Study. CHS Collaborative Research Group. Hypertension 1992;19(6 Pt 1):508–519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Fotherby MD, Potter JF. Orthostatic hypotension and anti‐hypertensive therapy in the elderly. Postgrad Med J 1994;70:878–881. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Ooi WL, Hossain M, Lipsitz LA. The association between orthostatic hypotension and recurrent falls in nursing home residents. Am J Med 2000;108:106–111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Jonsson PV, Lipsitz LA, Kelley M, Koestner J. Hypotensive responses to common daily activities in institutionalized elderly: a potential risk for recurrent falls. Arch Intern Med 1990;150:1518–1524. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Luukinen H, Koski K, Laippala P, Airaksinen KE. Orthostatic hypotension and the risk of myocardial infarction in the home‐dwelling elderly. J Intern Med 2004;255:486–493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Rose KM, Tyroler HA, Nardo CJ, et al. Orthostatic hypotension and the incidence of coronary heart disease: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study. Am J Hypertens 2000;13(6 Pt 1):571–578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Sarasin FP, Louis‐Simonet M, Carballo D, Slama S, Junod AF, Unger PF. Prevalence of orthostatic hypotension among patients presenting with syncope in the ED. Am J Emerg Med 2002;20:497–501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Feldstein C, Weder AB. Orthostatic hypotension: a common, serious and underrecognized problem in hospitalized patients. J Am Soc Hypertens 2012;6:27–39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Aung AK, Corcoran SJ, Nagalingam V, Paul E, Newnham HH. Prevalence, associations, and risk factors for orthostatic hypotension in medical, surgical, and trauma inpatients: an observational cohort study. Ochsner J 2012;12:35–41. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Angelousi A, Girerd N, Benetos A, et al. Association between orthostatic hypotension and cardiovascular risk, cerebrovascular risk, cognitive decline and falls as well as overall mortality: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Hypertens 2014;32:1562–1571; discussion 1571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Rose KM, Eigenbrodt ML, Biga RL, et al. Orthostatic hypotension predicts mortality in middle‐aged adults: the Atherosclerosis Risk In Communities (ARIC) Study. Circulation 2006;114:630–636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Xin W, Lin Z, Mi S. Orthostatic hypotension and mortality risk: a meta‐analysis of cohort studies. Heart 2014;100:406–413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Goldstein DS, Sharabi Y. Neurogenic orthostatic hypotension: a pathophysiological approach. Circulation 2009;119:139–146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Velseboer DC, de Haan RJ, Wieling W, Goldstein DS, de Bie RM. Prevalence of orthostatic hypotension in Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2011;17:724–729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Low PA, Reich SG, Jankovic J, et al. Natural history of multiple system atrophy in the USA: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Neurol 2015;14:710–719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Roncevic D, Palma JA, Martinez J, Goulding N, Norcliffe‐Kaufmann L, Kaufmann H. Cerebellar and parkinsonian phenotypes in multiple system atrophy: similarities, differences and survival. J Neural Transm (Vienna) 2014;121:507–512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Palma JA, Kaufmann H. Autonomic disorders predicting Parkinson's disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2014;20(Suppl 1):S94–S98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Jordan J, Shibao C, Biaggioni I. Multiple system atrophy: using clinical pharmacology to reveal pathophysiology. Clin Auton Res 2015;25:53–59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Fuente Mora C, Palma JA, Kaufmann H, Norcliffe‐Kaufmann L. Cerebral autoregulation and symptoms of orthostatic hypotension in familial dysautonomia. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2016;In Press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Horowitz DR, Kaufmann H. Autoregulatory cerebral vasodilation occurs during orthostatic hypotension in patients with primary autonomic failure. Clin Auton Res 2001;11:363–367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Palma JA, Norcliffe‐Kaufmann L, Kaufmann H. An orthostatic hypotension mimic: the inebriation‐like syndrome in Parkinson disease. Mov Disord 2016;31:598–600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Arnold AC, Biaggioni I. Management approaches to hypertension in autonomic failure. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 2012;21:481–485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Shibao C, Gamboa A, Diedrich A, et al. Acarbose, an alpha‐glucosidase inhibitor, attenuates postprandial hypotension in autonomic failure. Hypertension 2007;50:54–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Palma JA, Carmona‐Abellan MM, Barriobero N, et al. Is cardiac function impaired in premotor Parkinson's disease? A retrospective cohort study Mov Disord 2013;28:591–596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Norcliffe‐Kaufmann L, Kaufmann H. Is ambulatory blood pressure monitoring useful in patients with chronic autonomic failure? Clin Auton Res 2014;24:189–192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Umehara T, Matsuno H, Toyoda C, Oka H. Clinical characteristics of supine hypertension in de novo Parkinson disease. Clin Auton Res 2016;26:15–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Kamaruzzaman S, Watt H, Carson C, Ebrahim S. The association between orthostatic hypotension and medication use in the British Women's Heart and Health Study. Age Ageing 2010;39:51–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Biaggioni I, Robertson D, Krantz S, Jones M, Haile V. The anemia of primary autonomic failure and its reversal with recombinant erythropoietin. Ann Intern Med 1994;121:181–186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Azarov I, Huang KT, Basu S, Gladwin MT, Hogg N, Kim‐Shapiro DB. Nitric oxide scavenging by red blood cells as a function of hematocrit and oxygenation. J Biol Chem 2005;280:39024–39032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Allen BW, Piantadosi CA. How do red blood cells cause hypoxic vasodilation? The SNO‐hemoglobin paradigm. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2006;291:H1507–H1512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Perera R, Isola L, Kaufmann H. Effect of recombinant erythropoietin on anemia and orthostatic hypotension in primary autonomic failure. Clin Auton Res 1995;5:211–213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Toru S, Yokota T, Inaba A, et al. Autonomic dysfunction and orthostatic hypotention caused by vitamin B12 deficiency. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1999;66:804–805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Weinberg AD, Minaker KL. Dehydration: evaluation and management in older adults. Council on Scientific Affairs, American Medical Association. JAMA 1995;274:1552–1556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. May M, Jordan J. The osmopressor response to water drinking. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2011;300:R40–R46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. McHugh J, Keller NR, Appalsamy M, et al. Portal osmopressor mechanism linked to transient receptor potential vanilloid 4 and blood pressure control. Hypertension 2010;55:1438–1443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Chu YH, Hsu YJ, Lee HS, et al. The osmopressor response is linked to upregulation of aquaporin‐1 tyrosine phosphorylation on red blood cell membranes. Hypertension 2013;62:197–202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Kooner JS, Raimbach S, Watson L, Bannister R, Peart S, Mathias CJ. Relationship between splanchnic vasodilation and postprandial hypotension in patients with primary autonomic failure. J Hypertens Suppl 1989;7:S40–S41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Jansen RW, Lipsitz LA. Postprandial hypotension: epidemiology, pathophysiology, and clinical management. Ann Internal Med 1995;122:286–295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Krediet CT, van Lieshout JJ, Bogert LW, Immink RV, Kim YS, Wieling W. Leg crossing improves orthostatic tolerance in healthy subjects: a placebo‐controlled crossover study. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2006;291:H1768–H1772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Diedrich A, Biaggioni I. Segmental orthostatic fluid shifts. Clin Auton Res 2004;14:146–147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Smit AA, Wieling W, Fujimura J, et al. Use of lower abdominal compression to combat orthostatic hypotension in patients with autonomic dysfunction. Clin Auton Res 2004;14:167–175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Fanciulli A, Goebel G, Metzler B, et al. Elastic abdominal binders attenuate orthostatic hypotension in Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord Clin Pract 2016;3:156–160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Okamoto LE, Diedrich A, Baudenbacher FJ, et al. Efficacy of servo‐controlled splanchnic venous compression in the treatment of orthostatic hypotension: a randomized comparison with midodrine. Hypertension 2016;68:418–426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Shannon JR, Jordan J, Diedrich A, et al. Sympathetically mediated hypertension in autonomic failure. Circulation 2000;101:2710–2715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Goldstein DS, Pechnik S, Holmes C, Eldadah B, Sharabi Y. Association between supine hypertension and orthostatic hypotension in autonomic failure. Hypertension 2003;42:136–142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. MacLean AR, Allen EV. Orthostatic hypotension and orthostatic tachycardia—treatment with the “head‐up” bed. JAMA 1940;115:2162–2167. [Google Scholar]
- 56. Norcliffe‐Kaufmann L, Axelrod FB, Kaufmann H. Developmental abnormalities, blood pressure variability and renal disease in Riley Day syndrome. J Hum Hypertens 2013;27:51–55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Chobanian AV, Volicer L, Tifft CP, Gavras H, Liang CS, Faxon D. Mineralocorticoid‐induced hypertension in patients with orthostatic hypotension. N Engl J Med 1979;301:68–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Vagaonescu TD, Saadia D, Tuhrim S, Phillips RA, Kaufmann H. Hypertensive cardiovascular damage in patients with primary autonomic failure. Lancet 2000;355:725–726. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Wright RA, Kaufmann HC, Perera R, et al. A double‐blind, dose‐response study of midodrine in neurogenic orthostatic hypotension. Neurology 1998;51:120–124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Jankovic J, Gilden JL, Hiner BC, et al. Neurogenic orthostatic hypotension: a double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study with midodrine. Am J Med 1993;95:38–48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Low PA, Gilden JL, Freeman R, Sheng KN, McElligott MA. Efficacy of midodrine vs placebo in neurogenic orthostatic hypotension: a randomized, double‐blind multicenter study. Midodrine Study Group. JAMA 1997;277:1046–1051. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Smith W, Wan H, Much D, Robinson AG, Martin P. Clinical benefit of midodrine hydrochloride in symptomatic orthostatic hypotension: a phase 4, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, randomized, tilt‐table study. Clin Auton Res 2016;26:269–277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. McTavish D, Goa KL. Midodrine. A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use in orthostatic hypotension and secondary hypotensive disorders. Drugs 1989;38:757–777. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Kaufmann H, Norcliffe‐Kaufmann L, Palma JA. Droxidopa in neurogenic orthostatic hypotension. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 2015;13:875–891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Goldstein DS, Holmes C, Kaufmann H, Freeman R. Clinical pharmacokinetics of the norepinephrine precursor L‐threo‐DOPS in primary chronic autonomic failure. Clin Auton Res 2004;14:363–368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Birkmayer W, Birkmayer G, Lechner H, Riederer P. DL‐3,4‐threo‐DOPS in Parkinson's disease: effects on orthostatic hypotension and dizziness. J Neural Transm 1983;58:305–313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Sakoda S, Suzuki T, Higa S, et al. Treatment of orthostatic hypotension in Shy‐Drager syndrome with DL‐threo‐3,4‐dihydroxyphenylserine: a case report. Eur Neurol 1985;24:330–334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Senda Y, Muto T, Matsuoka Y, Takahashi A, Sobue I. Clinical effects of oral L‐threo‐3,4‐dihydroxyphenylserine on orthostatic hypotension in patients with Shy‐Drager syndrome. Rinsho Shinkeigaku [Clin Neurol] 1987;27:300–304. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Kachi T, Iwase S, Mano T, Saito M, Kunimoto M, Sobue I. Effect of L‐threo‐3,4‐dihydroxyphenylserine on muscle sympathetic nerve activities in Shy‐Drager syndrome. Neurology 1988;38:1091–1094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Kaufmann H, Freeman R, Biaggioni I, et al. Droxidopa for neurogenic orthostatic hypotension: a randomized, placebo‐controlled, phase 3 trial. Neurology 2014;83:328–335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Kaufmann H, Malamut R, Norcliffe‐Kaufmann L, Rosa K, Freeman R. The orthostatic hypotension questionnaire (OHQ): validation of a novel symptom assessment scale. Clin Auton Res 2012;22:79–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Hauser RA, Isaacson S, Lisk JP, Hewitt LA, Rowse G. Droxidopa for the short‐term treatment of symptomatic neurogenic orthostatic hypotension in Parkinson's disease (nOH306B). Mov Disord 2015;30:646–654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Elgebaly A, Abdelazeim B, Mattar O, Gadelkarim M, Salah R, Negida A. Meta‐analysis of the safety and efficacy of droxidopa for neurogenic orthostatic hypotension. Clin Auton Res 2016;26:171–180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Palma JA, Martinez J, Perez M, Norcliffe‐Kaufmann L, Kaufmann H. Predictors of response to droxidopa in patients with neurogenic orthostatic hypotension. Clin Aut Res 2016;26:343. [Google Scholar]
- 75. Kaufmann H, Norcliffe‐Kaufmann L, Hewitt LA, Rowse GJ, White WB. Effects of the novel norepinephrine prodrug, droxidopa, on ambulatory blood pressure in patients with neurogenic orthostatic hypotension. J Am Soc Hypertens 2016;10:819–826. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Kaufmann H, Saadia D, Voustianiouk A, et al. Norepinephrine precursor therapy in neurogenic orthostatic hypotension. Circulation 2003;108:724–728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Singer W, Sandroni P, Opfer‐Gehrking TL, et al. Pyridostigmine treatment trial in neurogenic orthostatic hypotension. Arch Neurol 2006;63:513–518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Ramirez CE, Okamoto LE, Arnold AC, et al. Efficacy of atomoxetine versus midodrine for the treatment of orthostatic hypotension in autonomic failure. Hypertension 2014;64:1235–1240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Shibao C, Norcliffe‐Kaufmann L, Kaufmann H, Biaggioni I. Baseline supine norepinephrine levels predict the improvement in orthostatic symptoms after atomoxetine in patients with neurogenic orthostatic hypotension. Clin Aut Res 2016;26:347. [Google Scholar]
- 80. ClinicalTrials.gov. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02796209.
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.