Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Leuk Res. 2016 Aug 26;50:17–20. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2016.08.014

The use of Erwinia Asparaginase for Adult Patients with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia after Pegaspargase Intolerance

Troy Z Horvat a, Joshua J Pecoraro a, Ryan J Daley a, Larry W Buie a, Amber C King a, Raajit K Rampal b, Martin S Tallman b, Jae H Park b, Dan Douer b
PMCID: PMC5507575  NIHMSID: NIHMS876445  PMID: 27631159

Abstract

Asparaginase administration has become a crucial component of front-line pediatric and pediatric inspired multi-agent regimens for the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). The aim of this study was to retrospectively assess the safety and feasibility of switching to Erwinia asparaginase after pegaspargase intolerance in adult ALL patients treated at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. Our analysis included 10 patients, with a median age of 39 years (range 20–72), 90% males, 70% with B-cell ALL, and 30% with T-cell ALL. Nine patients were switched to Erwinia asparaginase after pegaspargase hypersensitivity and one patient after grade 4 hyperbilirubinemia secondary to pegaspargase. With Erwinia asparaginase, no hypersensitivity reactions occurred and no patient developed other known clinical asparaginase-related toxicities. Laboratory adverse effects consisted of mostly mild elevation in liver enzymes. No morphologic relapses have occurred in any patient switched to Erwinia asparaginase in first remission at a follow up of 0.4–34.6 months. These findings are unique in that all of our patients received Erwinia asparaginase after hypersensitivity or intolerance to pegaspargase and 50% of them were older than 40 years of age, a population with very limited data. Our observations provide preliminary information that treatment with Erwinia asparaginase can proceed as scheduled in adult patients, despite pegaspargase hypersensitivity and possibly liver intolerance.

Keywords: acute lymphoblastic leukemia, ALL, Erwinia asparaginase, pegaspargase, hypersensitivity, safety

Introduction

In acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), malignant lymphoblasts have reduced expression of the enzyme asparagine synthetase and are unable to produce adequate amounts of asparagine, an amino acid needed for cell survival. As a result, lymphoblasts depend on extracellular sources of asparagine to maintain protein biosynthesis. The therapeutic administration of asparaginase, an enzyme that hydrolyzes l-asparagine to ammonia and l-aspartic acid, is lethal to lymphoblasts.1 As a result, prolonged asparaginase administration has become a crucial component of front-line pediatric and pediatric inspired multi-agent ALL regimens.27

Until recently, adult front-line regimens have either not included asparaginase or have only included it in 1–2 cycles.8 However, more recent data in adults with an upper age limit ranging between 39 and 55 years shows that pediatric or pediatric inspired regimens, with more cumulative doses of asparaginase, increase event-free survival rates to 60–65%.914

Three forms of asparaginase have been used in clinical practice in the US: native asparaginase derived from Escherichia coli (Elspar®, Ovation Pharmaceuticals), a pegylated form of the native E. coli asparaginase (Oncaspar®, Sigma Tau Pharmaceuticals), and an enzyme isolated from Erwinia chrysanthemi, known as Erwinia asparaginase (Erwinaze®, Jazz Pharmaceuticals). Native asparaginase was removed from the US market in 2012, secondary to supply issues and continued manufacturing difficulties.15

One of the critical side effects of asparaginase is hypersensitivity, with a rate that varies from 1.8 to 9.4% of pegaspargase-treated patients.11,14,16 Pegaspargase desensitization may not prevent recurrence of severe allergy; therefore patients should be switched to Erwinia asparaginase as a therapeutic alternative. 17 Erwinia-derived asparaginase also retains excellent activity in patients with E. coli asparaginase or pegaspargase neutralizing antibodies, and is deemed a suitable alternative for continued treatment in this patient population.1822

Additional adverse effects warranting consideration of pegaspargase discontinuation include high-grade hepatotoxicity, pancreatitis, major thrombosis, and major bleeding. There appears to be a correlation between age and certain pegaspargase-related toxicities, particularly hepatotoxicity.23,24

The half-life of Erwinia asparaginase is 7.5 hours (intravenous) or 15.6 hours (intramuscular), much shorter than that of pegaspargase (5.7–7 days).2527 Although currently not recommended, in patients with prior non-allergic severe toxicity to pegaspargase, Erwinia asparaginase might also be considered as a therapeutic alternative. Erwinia asparaginase has a significantly reduced duration of action that permits tighter control of drug exposure and more rapid reversal of asparagine depletion, should adverse effects occur. Nevertheless, the risk for allergic and non-allergic asparaginase-related adverse effects does still exist with the use of Erwinia asparaginase. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and feasibility of switching to Erwinia asparaginase in adult ALL patients after pegaspargase hypersensitivity or severe toxicity.

Methods

This is a single-center retrospective analysis of ten adult ALL patients who were switched to Erwinia asparaginase after allergy or intolerance to pegaspargase between November 2011 and May 2016. Toxicities were graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. The Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Investigational Review Board granted an exemption from IRB review.

Results

Patient characteristics

Ten adult patients received a total of 35 cycles (median 4 cycles each, range 1–6) of Erwinia asparaginase given as part of various pediatric-inspired chemotherapy regimens. The median age was 39 years (range 20–72), 90% were male, 70% had B-cell ALL, and 30% had T-cell ALL. Nine patients received Erwinia asparaginase while in first complete remission and only one as part of second-line therapy.

Patients received a median of 2 prior doses of pegaspargase (range 1–4) before switching to Erwinia asparaginase. The reasons for switching to Erwinia asparaginase were grade 3/4 pegaspargase-related clinical hypersensitivity in 9 patients (anaphylaxis n=7, urticaria/pruritus n=2) and grade 4 hyperbilirubinemia in one patient. A summary of patient characteristics is shown in table 1.

Table 1.

Patient Characteristics

Pt Age/ Sex Diagnosis Regimen Number of prior lines of therapy Number of doses of Peg received prior to switching Remission status prior to receiving Erwinia Reason for change Number of Erwinia cycles
1 29/M T-ALL C10403 0 2 Morpholo gic CR (MRD not assessed) SOB, chest discomfort, flushing, facial/throat swelling 5
2 23/M B-ALL AALL07P1 1 2 MRD+CR Anaphylaxis 4
3 20/M B-ALL NYII 0 3 MRD negative CR Hypotensio n, SOB, facial swelling 6
4 59/M T-ALL MSKCC
12-266
0 4 MRD negative CR Rash, Hives, SOB 3
5 28/M B-ALL MSKCC
12-266
0 2 MRD negative CR Hypotensio n, diaphoresis, tachycardia, and nausea 4
6 72/F B-ALL MSKCC
12-266
0 1 MRD negative CR SOB, flushing, rash 1
7 33/M B-ALL MSKCC
12-266
0 2 MRD negative CR Tachycardia, hypotension , syncope, LOC 5
8 55/M B-ALL MSKCC
12-266
0 1 Morpholo gic CR (MRD not assessed) Hepatotoxic ity with grade 4 hyperbilirub inemia 4
9 44/M B-ALL MSKCC
12-266
0 2 MRD negative CR SOB, blurred vision, diaphoresis 3*
10 54/M T-ALL MSKCC 12-266 0 2 MRD negative CR Hypotensio n, tachycardia, flushing, hives 1*
AST median (range) ALT median (range) Tbili median (range) Amylase median (range) Lipase median (range) TG median (range) Fibrinogen median (range) Thrombosis/ Hemorrhage Hypersensitivity to Erwinia
23 (16–57) 44 (23–102) 0.4 (0.2–0.7) 33 (29–39) 16 (11–25) 288 (189–683) 231 (144–305) No/No No
35 (22–56) 66 (29–70) 0.6 (0.6–0.9) 37 (28–50) NR NR 149 (106–335) No/No No
57 (40–60) 77 (59–112) 0.9 (0.6–1) 28 (23–53) NR NR 137 (77–176) No/No No
19 (16–38) 24 (14–44) 0.5 (0.2–0.9) 45 (27–55) 34 (30–49) 159 (93–318) 311 (206–440) No/No No
29 (16–57) 41 (22–69) 0.4 (0.2–0.8) 66 (56–131) 34 (23–47) 246 (80–819) 170 (102–247) No/No No
33 (21–36) 53 (40–54) 0.3 (0.3–0.4) 36 (29–36) 35 (29–37) 196 (195–330) 219 (219–325) No/No No
26 (13–72) 59 (36–157) 0.6 (0.4–1.0) 76 (35–102) 47 (30–84) 839 (144–2180) 180 (128–276) No/No No
26 (16–109) 25 (14–99) 1.0 (0.7–1.3) 74 (51–102) 30 (23–54) 200 (67–386) 186 (134–309) No/No No
9 (7–20) 12 (11–16) 0.5 (0.4–0.7) 12 (8–16) 24 (23–61) 535 (167–2076) 185 (178–207) No/No No
87 (64–119) 128 (68–243) 0.4 (0.3–0.7) 71 (51–84) 61 (41–70) 446 (380–667) 158 (125–245) No/No No

Pt = Patient; Peg = Pegaspargase; M = male; F = female; T-ALL = T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia; B-ALL = B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia; C10403 = CALBG 10403 protocol; CR = complete remission; MRD = minimal residual disease; MSKCC 12-266 = A Berlin-Frankfurt-Munster modeled, pediatric inspired multiagent chemotherapy regimen for newly diagnosed patients with ALL (NCT01920737); SOB = Shortness of breath; LOC = Loss of consciousness;

*

= Patients still receiving treatment;

AST = Aspartate transaminase; ALT = Alanine transaminase; Tbili = Total bilirubin; TG = triglycerides

Erwinia asparaginase dosing

Each cycle consisted of Erwinia asparaginase 25,000 units/m2 intramuscularly every 48 hours for 6 doses (either including or excluding weekends). Hydrocortisone 50–100 mg IV premedication was given with 66 of 203 total Erwinia asparaginase doses. Additionally, acetaminophen 650 mg and diphenhydramine 25–50 mg were given with 83 and 107 of 203 total Erwinia asparaginase doses, respectively. Seven patients received all intended doses of Erwinia asparaginase, 1 patient was lost to follow up after 1 cycle, and 2 patients were still receiving treatment at the time of analysis.

Erwinia asparaginase-related toxicities and patient outcome

No hypersensitivity reactions occurred and no patient developed other known clinical asparaginase- related toxicities. Laboratory adverse effects are reported in table 2 and consisted of mostly mild elevation in liver enzymes. The single patient who received Erwinia asparaginase as part of second-line therapy died from disease progression. Additionally, one patient died in a motor vehicle accident while in first complete remission. The remaining eight patients are alive and in first remission at 3.0–56.3 months from diagnosis. No morphologic or molecular relapses have occurred in any patient treated in first remission at a follow up of 0.4–34.6 months after switching to Erwinia asparaginase. No patient had undergone allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant at the time of analysis.

Table 2.

Laboratory abnormalities by grade

Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4
AST 7 1 0 0
ALT 7 2 1 0
TBILI 1 1 0 0
Amylase 3 0 0 0
Lipase 3 1 0 0
Triglycerides 4 4 5 2
Fibrinogen 3 7 1 0
Total 28 16 7 2

Discussion

We analyzed 10 patients to assess the safety and feasibility of using Erwinia asparaginase in adult ALL patients, nine after previous pegaspargase hypersensitivity. Replacing pegaspargase with Erwinia asparaginase after hypersensitivity allowed all patients to complete asparaginase therapy without hypersensitivity. Currently hypersensitivity is the only recommended reason, as well as the only FDA approved indication, for switching to Erwinia asparaginase.28 Nevertheless, one patient was switched to Erwinia asparaginase after grade 4 hyperbilirubinemia with pegaspargase. This patient was able to receive 24 doses of Erwinia asparaginase with only a grade 2 hyperbilirubinemia. This was transient and caused no adverse clinical consequences.

In general, adverse effects with Erwinia asparaginase were limited to laboratory abnormalities of minimal clinical consequence. In contrast to the known high rate of hepatotoxicity in adults treated with pegaspargase, in particular hyperbilirubinemia of 16–24%9,16,24 none of our patients developed grade 3 or 4 hyperbilirubinemia and only one patient had a grade 3 elevation in alanine aminotransferase. Within our small cohort undergoing first-line therapy, relapse did not occur after transitioning to this therapeutic alternative, although follow up was short in some patients.

Data for the use of Erwinia asparaginase in adult patients are lacking, particularly in those over the age of 40 years. The findings of a large compassionate-use trial established the safety profile of Erwinia asparaginase in children, adolescents and younger adults with ALL or lymphoblastic lymphoma, who had experienced hypersensitivity reactions to E. coli-derived asparaginase.22 However, only nine patients over the age of 40 were enrolled in this study. Bigliardi and colleagues reported positive results in treating adult patients with Erwinia asparaginase in the front-line setting, however, only three of their eleven patients treated with Erwinia asparaginase were over the age of 40.29 Our data are unique in that all of our patients received Erwinia asparaginase after hypersensitivity or intolerance to pegaspargase and 50% of them were older than 40 years of age.

Limitations of our analysis include: a single institution experience, a relatively small sample size, and retrospective grading of toxicity. Additionally, data on asparaginase trough levels and serum asparagine depletion were not available. However, our patients received Erwinia asparaginase via the intramuscular route which was reported to produce adequate asparaginase activity between doses in all patients as compared to the intravenous route.30 Additionally, no patients experienced pegaspargase-pancreatitis, major thrombosis, or major hemorrhage. However, due to the small sample size of our analysis, no comments can be made about the rates and safety of continuing Erwinia asparaginase after these toxicities. The results from the analysis of our relatively small cohort should be confirmed with larger prospective cohorts.

The completion of all planned asparaginase treatments has been shown to be clinically beneficial in the pediatric ALL population.18 In light of the critical role of asparaginase in ALL therapy, our observations, along with pediatric and young adult data,22,29 provides preliminary information that treatment with Erwinia asparaginase can proceed as scheduled despite pegaspargase hypersensitivity and possibly liver intolerance.

Highlights.

  • Ten patients were switched to Erwinia asparaginase after pegaspargase intolerance

  • After switching to Erwinia asparaginase, no hypersensitivity reactions occurred

  • No patient developed clinically relevant asparaginase-related toxicities

  • No relapses occurred in patients switched to Erwinia asparaginase in CR1

  • Erwinia asparaginase can administered, despite prior pegaspargase intolerance

Acknowledgments

Funding: This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.Cooney DA, Handschumacher RE. L-asparaginase and L-asparagine metabolism. Annual review of pharmacology. 1970;10:421–40. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pa.10.040170.002225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Amylon MD, Shuster J, Pullen J, et al. Intensive high-dose asparaginase consolidation improves survival for pediatric patients with T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia and advanced stage lymphoblastic lymphoma: a Pediatric Oncology Group study. Leukemia. 1999;13:335–42. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2401310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Clavell LA, Gelber RD, Cohen HJ, et al. Four-agent induction and intensive asparaginase therapy for treatment of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. The New England journal of medicine. 1986;315:657–63. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198609113151101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Nachman JB, Sather HN, Sensel MG, et al. Augmented post-induction therapy for children with high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia and a slow response to initial therapy. The New England journal of medicine. 1998;338:1663–71. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199806043382304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Pession A, Valsecchi MG, Masera G, et al. Long-term results of a randomized trial on extended use of high dose L-asparaginase for standard risk childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2005;23:7161–7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.11.411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Seibel NL, Steinherz PG, Sather HN, et al. Early postinduction intensification therapy improves survival for children and adolescents with high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a report from the Children's Oncology Group. Blood. 2008;111:2548–55. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-02-070342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Silverman LB, Gelber RD, Dalton VK, et al. Improved outcome for children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: results of Dana-Farber Consortium Protocol 91–01. Blood. 2001;97:1211–8. doi: 10.1182/blood.v97.5.1211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Douer D. Will novel agents for ALL finally change the natural history? Best practice & research Clinical haematology. 2014;27:247–58. doi: 10.1016/j.beha.2014.10.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Goekbuget N, Baumann A, Beck J, et al. PEG-Asparaginase Intensification In Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL): Significant Improvement of Outcome with Moderate Increase of Liver Toxicity In the German Multicenter Study Group for Adult ALL (GMALL) Study 07/2003. Blood. 2010;116:494. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Stock W, Luger SM, Advani AS, et al. Favorable Outcomes for Older Adolescents and Young Adults (AYA) with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL): Early Results of U.S. Intergroup Trial C10403. Blood. 2014;124:796. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.DeAngelo DJ, Stevenson K, Neuberg DS, et al. A Multicenter Phase II Study Using a Dose Intensified Pegylated-Asparaginase Pediatric Regimen in Adults with Untreated Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A DFCI ALL Consortium Trial. Blood. 2015;126:80. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.DeAngelo DJ, Stevenson KE, Dahlberg SE, et al. Long-term outcome of a pediatric-inspired regimen used for adults aged 18–50 years with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leukemia. 2015;29:526–34. doi: 10.1038/leu.2014.229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Huguet F, Leguay T, Raffoux E, et al. Pediatric-inspired therapy in adults with Philadelphia chromosome-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia: the GRAALL-2003 study. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2009;27:911–8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.18.6916. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Douer D, Aldoss I, Lunning MA, et al. Pharmacokinetics-based integration of multiple doses of intravenous pegaspargase in a pediatric regimen for adults with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2014;32:905–11. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.50.2708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. [Accessed May 3, 2016];RE: Discontinuation of Elspar, (asparaginase for injection) 10,000 IU. 2012 at http://www.fda.gov/downloads/drugs/drugsafety/drugshortages/ucm321556.pdf.
  • 16.Sanford B, Luger S, Devidas M, et al. Frontline-Treatment Of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) In Older Adolescents and Young Adults (AYA) Using a Pediatric Regimen Is Feasible: Toxicity Results of the Prospective US Intergroup Trial C10403 (Alliance) Blood. 2013;122:3903. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Sahiner UM, Yavuz ST, Gokce M, et al. Anaphylactic reaction to polyethylene-glycol conjugated-asparaginase: premedication and desensitization may not be sufficient. Pediatrics international : official journal of the Japan Pediatric Society. 2013;55:531–3. doi: 10.1111/ped.12131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Vrooman LM, Stevenson KE, Supko JG, et al. Postinduction dexamethasone and individualized dosing of Escherichia Coli L-asparaginase each improve outcome of children and adolescents with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia: results from a randomized study--Dana-Farber Cancer Institute ALL Consortium Protocol 00-01. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2013;31:1202–10. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.43.2070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Salzer WL, Asselin B, Supko JG, et al. Erwinia asparaginase achieves therapeutic activity after pegaspargase allergy: a report from the Children's Oncology Group. Blood. 2013;122:507–14. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-01-480822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Willer A, Gerss J, Konig T, et al. Anti-Escherichia coli asparaginase antibody levels determine the activity of second-line treatment with pegylated E coli asparaginase: a retrospective analysis within the ALL-BFM trials. Blood. 2011;118:5774–82. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-07-367904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zalewska-Szewczyk B, Gach A, Wyka K, Bodalski J, Mlynarski W. The cross-reactivity of anti-asparaginase antibodies against different L-asparaginase preparations. Clinical and experimental medicine. 2009;9:113–6. doi: 10.1007/s10238-008-0026-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Plourde PV, Jeha S, Hijiya N, et al. Safety profile of asparaginase Erwinia chrysanthemi in a large compassionate-use trial. Pediatric blood & cancer. 2014;61:1232–8. doi: 10.1002/pbc.24938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wetzler M, Sanford BL, Kurtzberg J, et al. Effective asparagine depletion with pegylated asparaginase results in improved outcomes in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Cancer and Leukemia Group B Study 9511. Blood. 2007;109:4164–7. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-09-045351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Rytting M, Earl M, Douer D, Muriera B, Advani A, Bleyer A. Toxicities in Adults with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) Treated with Regimens Using Pegasparaginase. Blood. 2008;112:1924. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Douer D, Yampolsky H, Cohen LJ, et al. Pharmacodynamics and safety of intravenous pegaspargase during remission induction in adults aged 55 years or younger with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood. 2007;109:2744–50. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-07-035006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Asselin BL, Whitin JC, Coppola DJ, Rupp IP, Sallan SE, Cohen HJ. Comparative pharmacokinetic studies of three asparaginase preparations. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 1993;11:1780–6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1993.11.9.1780. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Vrooman LM, Kirov II, Dreyer ZE, et al. Activity and Toxicity of Intravenous Erwinia Asparaginase Following Allergy to E. coli-Derived Asparaginase in Children and Adolescents With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. Pediatric blood & cancer. 2016;63:228–33. doi: 10.1002/pbc.25757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Stock W, Douer D, DeAngelo DJ, et al. Prevention and management of asparaginase/pegasparaginase-associated toxicities in adults and older adolescents: recommendations of an expert panel. Leukemia & lymphoma. 2011;52:2237–53. doi: 10.3109/10428194.2011.596963. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Bigliardi S, Morselli M, Potenza L, et al. Safety profile of Erwinia asparaginase treatment in adults with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a retrospective monocenter study. Leukemia & lymphoma. 2015;56:770–3. doi: 10.3109/10428194.2014.933216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Okusanya OO, Dinndorf PA, Bullock J, et al. Intramuscular (IM) or intravenous (IV): Impact of Erwinia asparaginase route of administration on asparaginase activity. ASCO Meeting Abstracts. 2015;33:10031. [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES