Abstract
IL-1β release is integral to the innate immune system. The release of mature IL-1β depends on 2 regulated events: the de novo induction of pro-IL-1β, generally via NF-κB-dependent transduction pathways; and the assembly and activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome. This latter step is reliant on active caspase-1, pannexin-1, and P2X7 receptor activation. Pathogen-associated molecular patterns in gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria activate IL-1β release from immune cells via TLR2 and TLR4 receptors, respectively. We found that pro-IL-1β and mature IL-1β release from human monocytes is stimulated by the TLR2 agonists Pam3CSK4 or FSL-1, as well as the TLR4 agonist LPS in the absence of additional ATP. TLR2 agonists required pannexin-1 and P2X7 receptor activation to stimulate IL-1β release. In contrast, IL-1β release stimulated by the TLR4 agonist LPS is independent of both pannexin-1 and P2X7 activation. In the absence of exogenous ATP, P2X7 activation requires endogenous ATP release, which occurs in some cells via pannexin-1. In line with this, we found that LPS-stimulated human monocytes released relatively low levels of ATP, whereas cells stimulated with TLR2 agonists released high levels of ATP. These findings suggest that in human monocytes, both TLR2 and TLR4 signaling induce pro-IL-1β expression, but the mechanism by which they activate caspase-1 diverges at the level of the pannexin-1/ATP/P2X7 axis.—Parzych, K., Zetterqvist, A. V., Wright, W. R., Kirkby, N. S., Mitchell, J. A., Paul-Clark, M. J. Differential role of pannexin-1/ATP/P2X7 axis in IL-1β release by human monocytes.
Keywords: inflammasome, innate immunity, Toll-like receptors, potassium channels
IL-1β is a proinflammatory cytokine with a pivotal role in innate immunity and is a monotherapeutic target for a number of inflammatory conditions, such as gout (1). Unlike other proinflammatory cytokines, such as TNF-α and IL-6, IL-1β is not processed in the traditional manner through the Golgi apparatus. Instead, it is cleaved from its precursor molecule pro-IL-1β. In this fashion, mature IL-1β production requires 2 distinct steps: first a priming stage where pro-IL-1β is induced, followed by the assembly and activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome, which enzymatically cleaves caspase-1 to its active form.
The priming step in IL-1β production is triggered by many proinflammatory stimuli, including bacterial pathogen-associated molecular patterns, which activate pattern recognition receptors (2), such as the TLRs. Production of mature IL-1β from pro-IL-1β is less well understood, particularly the processes leading to activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome, which seem to vary between cell types and particular stimuli. Current knowledge indicates that NLRP3 inflammasome activation is mediated by pannexin-1, a large-pore channel that facilitates the release of ATP and potassium ions. ATP released via pannexin-1 activates the purine receptor P2X7, resulting in additional potassium ion efflux (3). ATP/P2X7 signaling can then further activate pannexin-1, resulting in an amplification loop for potassium efflux and cellular hyperpolarization (4). This triggers nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain inflammasome assembly and activation.
Potassium efflux and cell hyperpolarization facilitated by the pannexin-1/ATP/P2X7 axis is probably the best-studied mechanism by which NLRP3 inflammasome and caspase-1 activation occurs. There are, however, pannexin-1-independent pathways that lead to NLRP3 inflammasome. For example, physical perturbation of the cell membrane by nanoparticles or crystals of cholesterol or monosodium urate can cause hyperpolarization of cells through direct membrane damage (5–7).
In many studies designed to investigate IL-1β release from cells, the assembly and activation step in the process is artificially modeled by simply adding very high levels of ATP, in the millimolar range (8). This has proved useful in determining aspects of cell priming and the function of pannexin-1 and P2X7. However, exogenous ATP in millimolar concentrations is unlikely to occur in the body, even at sites of inflammation. Thus, understanding how IL-1β release occurs in more physiologic settings requires the inclusion of protocols in which endogenous pathways are compared without an artificially large exogenous ATP challenge (9).
Monocytes release ATP when stimulated with LPS (10), while human macrophages and dendritic cells differ from monocytes in their ability to release both ATP and mature IL-1β after stimulation with TLR ligands. For example, human monocytes, but not macrophages or dendritic cells, have been shown to have constitutively active caspase-1, meaning that they release mature IL-1β after stimulation with TLR2 or TLR4 agonists, without the requirement of exogenous ATP (9). However, the role of pannexin-1 and/or P2X7 in endogenous release of IL-1β stimulated by TLR4 vs. TLR2 agonists has not been addressed.
Thus, in the present study, we compared the relative ability of TLR2 and TLR4 agonists to activate caspase-1, express pro-IL-1β, and release ATP and mature IL-1β from human monocytic cells. We also determined the relative role that pannexin-1 and P2X7 may have in IL-1β production induced by TLR2 vs. TLR4.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Cell culture
Human acute monocytic leukemia cell line THP-1 was obtained from the European Collection of Cell Cultures (Salisbury, United Kingdom) and cultured in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% filtered heat-inactivated fetal calf serum, 2 mM glutamine, and 100 U/ml penicillin/streptomycin and maintained at 37°C containing 5% CO2. Cells were seeded in 96-well plates at 1 × 105 cells per well for 12 h before treatment. Cell viability was assessed using alamarBlue (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) after all treatments, and IL-1β and pro-IL-1β release was measured by ELISA (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA).
Inhibitor treatments
Human monocytes were treated with TLR4 agonist LPS (0.001 to 1 μg/ml), or TLR2 agonists Pam3CSK4 (0.001 to 1 μg/ml) and/or FSL-1 (0.001 to 1 μg/ml) for 3 or 24 h. In some experiments, cells were pulsed for 30 min with ATP (1–5 mM) after activation. In the inhibition studies, cells were pretreated for 30 min with inhibitors of caspase-1 (Z-VAD-FMK; 0.01 to 1 µg/ml), pannexin-1 (carbenoxolone; 0.03 to 30 µg/ml), P2X7 (AZ11645373; 0.01 to 1 µg/ml), or MaxiK (large-conductance, voltage-dependent, and Ca2+-activated K+) channel (paxilline 5–20 µM, or TEA 5–20 mM), after which they were stimulated with LPS, Pam3CSK4, or FSL-1.
Small interfering RNA transfection
THP-1 cells were resuspended in solution V (VCA-1003). siRNA was added (20–100 nM), and cells were electroporated using standard methods (Amaxa Nucleofector transfection system; Lonza, Basel, Switzerland). After incubation in prewarmed medium for 10 min at 37°C, cells were transferred onto a 96-well plate. After 48 h, cells were treated as above. Small interfering RNA (siRNA) sequences used were AllStars Negative Control siRNA (Qiagen, Germantown, MD, USA) and On-TargetPlus SmartPool, Human Panx1 (GE Dharmacon, Lafayette, CO, USA), as follows: 5′-UAAGUGAGGUCAAGUCAUA-3′, 5′-CGGCAGAGCUCCAAGGUAU-3′, 5′-CAUAUUUGCUCAGACUUGA-3′, and 5′-CACUGUGGCUGCAUAAGUU-3′.
Western blot analysis
Western blot analysis was performed 48 h after gene knockdown. Whole-cell protein extracts were prepared on ice using a lysis buffer containing 50 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 50 mM sodium fluoride, 5 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT, 10% glycerol, 1% Triton X-100, and complete EDTA-free Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (Roche, Basel, Switzerland). Protein extracts were loaded on a SDS-PAGE gel, transferred to PVDF membrane, and subjected to the incubation with individual antibodies. Primary antibodies used were as follows: pannexin-1 (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), P2X7 (Alomone Labs, Jerusalem, Israel), β-tubulin (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA). The PageRuler Plus Prestained Protein Ladder (Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA) was used as a molecular weight marker.
Caspase-1 activity
Caspase-1 activity was measured by FAM FLICA with an in vitro caspase detection kit according to the manufacturer's instructions (Abcam). Briefly, A549 cells were treated with either DMSO or LPS (0.1 μg/ml) or Pam3CSK4 (0.1 μg/ml) for 24 h. Cells were labeled with FAM FLICA for 60 min at 37°C. After washing, cells were read on a fluorescent plate reader (excitation wavelength 488 nm, emission wavelength 530 nm).
ATP release
ATP release from THP-1 cells was measured using the ChronoLume luciferase assay system (Chrono-Log, Havertown, PA, USA). THP-1 cells, cultured in 96-well microtiter plates, were stimulated with LPS (0.1 μg/ml) or Pam3CSK4 (0.1 μg/ml). Cells were incubated for 30 min; then ChronoLUME reagent containing firefly luciferase (16 μg/ml final) and d-luciferin (1760 U/ml final) was added to each well. After brief mixing, the luminescence read using a Mithras LB940 multimode plate reader (Berthold Technologies, Bad Wildbad, Germany). ATP release was calculated with reference to the luminescence of wells containing ChronoLume and 40 μM exogenous ATP standard (Chrono-Log).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
To assess the effects of TLR2 and TLR4 ligands on the release of IL-1β by human monocytes, cells were treated for 24 h with FSL-1 or Pam3CSK4 (TLR2), or with LPS (TLR4). In each case, Pam3CSK4, FSL-1, or LPS caused a concentration-dependent release of mature IL-1β into the conditioned media without the requirement of exogenous ATP (Fig. 1A). In line with this, both Pam3CSK4 and LPS increased the release of unprocessed pro-IL-β (Fig. 1B). As expected, and as others have shown, when cells were primed with Pam3CSK4, FSL-1, or LPS and challenged with a brief (20 min) exposure to millimolar concentrations of exogenous ATP, mature IL-1β was released (Fig. 1C, D). IL-1β release in response to exogenous ATP is known to require pannexin-1 and P2X7 cooperation (11). However, in the absence of exogenous ATP, the role these pathways play in TLR4-mediated vs. TLR2-mediated IL-1β release is incompletely understood.
The processing of IL-1β from pro-IL-1β requires caspase-1 (12). Thus, as expected, we found that IL-1β release stimulated by either LPS or Pam3CSK4 and FSL-1 was inhibited in a concentration-dependent manner by the pan-caspase inhibitor Z-VAD-FMK (Fig. 2A). However, while IL-1β release stimulated by the TLR2 ligands Pam3CSK4 and FSL-1 was inhibited by the pannexin-1 inhibitor carbenoxolone, release stimulated by the TLR4 agonist LPS was completely unaffected (Fig. 2B). Activation of pannexin-1 results in ATP release and subsequent activation of P2X7 (13). In line with what we observed with pannexin-1, inhibition of P2X7 using pharmacologic concentrations of AZ11645373 inhibited IL-β release by Pam3CSK4 and FSL-1, but did not affect release by LPS (Fig. 2C). It has been shown in human macrophages that the large conductance potassium channel MaxiK plays a crucial role in the cellular activation by TLRs (14). This may therefore be an alternative way for potassium efflux to occur in human monocytes, leading to the consequent assembly and activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome after TLR4 stimulation. Impeding this process by using the MaxiK inhibitor paxilline resulted in an inhibition of IL-1β from both LPS- and Pam3CSK4-stimulated cells (Fig. 2D), thus suggesting that this pathway plays an important role in both TLR2 and TLR4 activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome.
Using pharmacologic tools to dissect signaling pathways can be subject to compromise by nonspecific drug effects. AZ11645373 is a well-validated drug and is highly specific to human P2X7 receptors when used at mid–high nanomolar concentrations (15). Carbenoxolone, while widely used as a pannexin-1 inhibitor, is not specific and has well-documented effects on other biologic pathways (16). Thus, in order to validate our observation that TLR4-induced IL-1β production occurs independently of pannexin-1 and P2X7, we performed gene knockdown of pannexin-1. Selected siRNA sequences for pannexin-1 reduced its expression at both the transcriptional and translation level (Fig. 3A, B), and, directly corroborating our data using pharmacologic inhibitors, it also reduced IL-1β release induced by the TLR2 agonist Pam3CSK4 (Fig. 3C) but not by the TLR4 agonist LPS (Fig. 3D). By way of a functional control, production of CXCL8, which is stimulated by TLR2 or TLR4 agonists in parallel with IL-1β and independently of caspase-1, was not affected by any of the inhibitor drugs (Supplemental Fig. 1). Similarly, cell viability was not compromised in any of the protocols used (Supplemental Fig. 2).
Pannexin-1 activation and gap junction formation are recognized mechanisms by which endogenous ATP is actively released from cells (9). Once released from cells primed for pro-IL-1β induction, ATP acts on P2X7 receptors to amplify potassium ion efflux (17). Because our data suggest that TLR2, but not TLR4, receptor activation involves pannexin-1, we measured release of ATP from cells stimulated with LPS vs. Pam3CSK4. We found that monocytes stimulated with Pam3CSK4 released significantly higher levels of ATP than monocytes stimulated with LPS (Fig. 4A). These observations, together with our data implicating the involvement of P2X7 in TLR2-mediated, but not TLR4-mediated, IL-1β release, suggest that LPS-induced ATP release from monocytes is not sufficient to initiate NLRP3 inflammasome assembly, whereas levels of ATP released by Pam3CSK4 constitute a pharmacologically relevant event.
The function of pannexin-1 and P2X7 in IL-1β release is ultimately to mediate potassium ion efflux; this is required for assembly and activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome and subsequent activation of caspase-1. Netea et al. (9) showed that in primary monocytes, but not in THP-1 cells, caspase-1 is constitutively active. Thus, we next sought to determine whether TLR4 signaling with LPS differed from TLR2 signaling with Pam3CSK4 at the level of caspase-1 activation. We found that caspase-1 was activated at identical levels when cells were treated with either Pam3CSK4 or LPS (Fig. 4B), thus suggesting that the extent of NLRP3 activation, and hence IL-11β release, is similar with both TLR2 and TLR4 activation. However, it seems that the monocytes have different ways of processing these stimuli.
Taken together, our observations, using a simple monocytic cell line model, show that TLR2- and TLR4-mediated activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome and subsequent activation of caspase-1 can occur by completely different signaling pathways. For TLR2, we have defined these pathways and hypothesize that the sequence of events is 1) activation of pannexin-1, 2) release of ATP, 3) activation of P2X7, 4) efflux of potassium ions, and 5) activation of NLRP3 (Fig. 5A). For TLR4, a full characterization of the steps leading to activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome and caspase-1 was beyond the scope of this study, but our results indicated that it was independent of either pannexin-1 or P2X7. Possible pathways include the activation of MaxiK channels, which are activated by LPS (18, 19) and facilitate potassium efflux without involvement of the pannexin-1/ATP/P2X7 axis (Fig. 5B).
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported, in part, by the Wellcome Trust Foundation and the National Heart And Lung Institute Foundation.
Glossary
- MaxiK
large-conductance, voltage-dependent, and Ca2+-activated K+
- siRNA
small interfering RNA
Footnotes
This article includes supplemental data. Please visit http://www.fasebj.org to obtain this information.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
K. Parzych, A. Zetterqvist, N. S. Kirkby, and M. J. Paul-Clark contributed to the design of experiments, carried out experiments, and contributed to the writing of the article; W. R. Wright carried out experiments; and J. A. Mitchell contributed to the design of experiments and writing of the article.
REFERENCES
- 1.Dinarello C. A., van der Meer J. W. (2013) Treating inflammation by blocking interleukin-1 in humans. Semin. Immunol. 25, 469–484 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Pétrilli V., Dostert C., Muruve D. A., Tschopp J. (2007) The inflammasome: a danger sensing complex triggering innate immunity. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 19, 615–622 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Iglesias R., Locovei S., Roque A., Alberto A. P., Dahl G., Spray D. C., Scemes E. (2008) P2X7 receptor–pannexin1 complex: pharmacology and signaling. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 295, C752–C760 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Locovei S., Wang J., Dahl G. (2006) Activation of pannexin 1 channels by ATP through P2Y receptors and by cytoplasmic calcium. FEBS Lett. 580, 239–244 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Chu J., Thomas L. M., Watkins S. C., Franchi L., Núñez G., Salter R. D. (2009) Cholesterol-dependent cytolysins induce rapid release of mature IL-1beta from murine macrophages in a NLRP3 inflammasome and cathepsin B–dependent manner. J. Leukoc. Biol. 86, 1227–1238 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Yazdi A. S., Guarda G., Riteau N., Drexler S. K., Tardivel A., Couillin I., Tschopp J. (2010) Nanoparticles activate the NLR pyrin domain containing 3 (Nlrp3) inflammasome and cause pulmonary inflammation through release of IL-1α and IL-1β. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 19449–19454 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Martinon F., Pétrilli V., Mayor A., Tardivel A., Tschopp J. (2006) Gout-associated uric acid crystals activate the NALP3 inflammasome. Nature 440, 237–241 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Le Feuvre R. A., Brough D., Iwakura Y., Takeda K., Rothwell N. J. (2002) Priming of macrophages with lipopolysaccharide potentiates P2X7-mediated cell death via a caspase-1-dependent mechanism, independently of cytokine production. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 3210–3218 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Netea M. G., Nold-Petry C. A., Nold M. F., Joosten L. A., Opitz B., van der Meer J. H., van de Veerdonk F. L., Ferwerda G., Heinhuis B., Devesa I., Funk C. J., Mason R. J., Kullberg B. J., Rubartelli A., van der Meer J. W., Dinarello C. A. (2009) Differential requirement for the activation of the inflammasome for processing and release of IL-1beta in monocytes and macrophages. Blood 113, 2324–2335 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ferrari D., Chiozzi P., Falzoni S., Hanau S., Di Virgilio F. (1997) Purinergic modulation of interleukin-1 beta release from microglial cells stimulated with bacterial endotoxin. J. Exp. Med. 185, 579–582 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Pelegrin P., Surprenant A. (2006) Pannexin-1 mediates large pore formation and interleukin-1beta release by the ATP-gated P2X7 receptor. EMBO J. 25, 5071–5082 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Martinon F., Burns K., Tschopp J. (2002) The inflammasome: a molecular platform triggering activation of inflammatory caspases and processing of proIL-beta. Mol. Cell 10, 417–426 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Pelegrin P., Surprenant A. (2007) Pannexin-1 couples to maitotoxin- and nigericin-induced interleukin-1beta release through a dye uptake-independent pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 2386–2394 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Scheel O., Papavlassopoulos M., Blunck R., Gebert A., Hartung T., Zähringer U., Seydel U., Schromm A. B. (2006) Cell activation by ligands of the Toll-like receptor and interleukin-1 receptor family depends on the function of the large-conductance potassium channel MaxiK in human macrophages. Infect. Immun. 74, 4354–4356 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Stokes L., Jiang L. H., Alcaraz L., Bent J., Bowers K., Fagura M., Furber M., Mortimore M., Lawson M., Theaker J., Laurent C., Braddock M., Surprenant A. (2006) Characterization of a selective and potent antagonist of human P2X(7) receptors, AZ11645373. Br. J. Pharmacol. 149, 880–887 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Connors B. W. (2012) Tales of a dirty drug: carbenoxolone, gap junctions, and seizures. Epilepsy Curr. 12, 66–68 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kahlenberg J. M., Dubyak G. R. (2004) Mechanisms of caspase-1 activation by P2X7 receptor–mediated K+ release. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 286, C1100–C1108 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Müller M., Scheel O., Lindner B., Gutsmann T., Seydel U. (2003) The role of membrane-bound LBP, endotoxin aggregates, and the MaxiK channel in LPS-induced cell activation. J. Endotoxin Res. 9, 181–186 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Seydel U., Scheel O., Müller M., Brandenburg K., Blunck R. (2001) A K+ channel is involved in LPS signaling. J. Endotoxin Res. 7, 243–247 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.