Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Apr 18.
Published in final edited form as: JAMA. 2017 Apr 18;317(15):1529–1530. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.1628

The DASH Diet, 20 Years Later

Dori Steinberg 1, Gary G Bennett 2, Laura Svetkey 3
PMCID: PMC5509411  NIHMSID: NIHMS877115  PMID: 28278326

This year marks the 20th anniversary of the publication showing the blood pressure–lowering effects of the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet.1 The DASH diet is considered an important advance in nutritional science. It emphasizes foods rich in protein, fiber, potassium, magnesium, and calcium, such as fruits and vegetables, beans, nuts, whole grains, and low-fat dairy. It also limits foods high in saturated fat and sugar.1 DASH is not a reduced-sodium diet, but its effect is enhanced by also lowering sodium intake.1 Since the creation of DASH 20 years ago, numerous trials have demonstrated that it consistently lowers blood pressure across a diverse range of patients with hypertension and prehypertension.

The initial DASH trial was a 4-site, randomized controlled feeding study. Compared with a control diet typical of US consumption, the DASH diet produced reductions in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) of 5.5 and 3.0 mm Hg, respectively—with results evident as early as 2 weeks after baseline.1 Blood pressure changes were observed in subgroups of men, women, racial/ethnic minorities, white individuals, and both hypertensive and prehypertensive participants.1 DASH was particularly effective for those with hypertension (SBP and DBP change: −10.7 and −4.7 mm Hg, respectively) and among black individuals (SBP and DBP change: −6.8 and −3.7 mm Hg, respectively).1 Because of this strong evidence, DASH has been a consistent part of national blood pressure and dietary guidelines since its original publication.2

Yet adherence to DASH on a national level is poor. A decade-old analysis of data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) showed that less than 1% of the US population was fully adherent to DASH in 1988 to 2004, and only 20% met half of the recommended levels of nutrients in DASH.3 Analyses using more recent NHANES data from 2007 to 2012 showed similarly poor adherence; the average DASH adherence score was 2.6 of a possible 9.4 The public health significance of poor DASH adherence cannot be overstated. Of the 80 million individuals in the United States with hypertension, only half have controlled blood pressure.5 Hypertension is a primary risk factor for heart disease and stroke, 2 of the leading causes of death in the United States. A major public health challenge continues to be the broad dissemination and translation of DASH.

Achieving this goal first requires understanding the potential determinants of poor DASH adherence. At the environmental level, poor DASH adherence may be attributed to the current US food environment. Energy-dense, nutrient-deficient foods are highly accessible and inexpensive. Fruits and vegetables tend to be more expensive than other foods that can be purchased at fast-food restaurants. This is particularly true for low-income individuals who may reside in areas where DASH foods are less accessible. Despite these barriers, research has shown that DASH can be adopted at low cost and among low-income individuals6; foods such as dried beans or frozen vegetables are inexpensive and DASH accordant. Changing the food environment is a challenging task that will require changes at the community and policy levels. In the meantime, to improve adoption of DASH, efforts should focus on how individuals can work within their environments to improve their diets.

At the clinical level, primary care clinicians have an opportunity to provide counseling about dietary behaviors for hypertension management. Yet clinicians consistently report that limited time, knowledge, and perceived efficacy are barriers to dietary counseling. Moreover, many clinicians still primarily (or exclusively) recommend reducing sodium intake for hypertension control.7 The extent to which primary care clinicians, who are responsible for the management of most patients with hypertension, are familiar with DASH is unknown.7 In contrast, registered dietitians are well suited to provide counseling. Improving reimbursement coverage for registered dietitians could improve their reach.

At the individual level, innovative strategies are needed to induce sustainable behavior change. An emerging strategy to improve patient self-management is the use of digital health tools. Most US adults own a mobile phone and 77% have smartphones.8 High rates of mobile phone and smartphone ownership extend to historically disconnected populations: rural, low-income, and racial/ethnic minority groups.8 Because mobile devices are almost ubiquitous, they pose a unique opportunity to reach the highest-risk populations. Many apps and devices are available in the marketplace that explore how best to provide data that can be useful for lifestyle change and patient self-management.

Yet a limited number of tools are truly evidence based. Some investigators have developed evidence-based apps that are effective and promote high engagement. For instance, Burke et al9 found that a digital weight loss intervention was superior in both self-monitoring engagement and weight loss compared with a nondigital approach. However, these research-based programs do not have the same reach as commercial products. It may be that researchers need to investigate how to integrate evidence-based approaches into the industry’s publicly available tools to accelerate translation and heighten effectiveness. In the case of DASH and digital approaches to health, research findings have not penetrated the commercial market. This is because few research studies have examined how to best deliver DASH through digital health tools. To truly disseminate DASH will require better understanding about how to harness tools that almost all people in the United States already have in their pocket right now.

The DASH diet represents a potentially affordable and scalable intervention that could almost immediately produce considerable improvements in population health. However, innovative strategies are necessary to determine how best to minimize the barriers to its widespread dissemination. The potential benefits of promoting DASH are substantial. As a study from 2003 suggested, if individuals with hypertension were fully adherent to DASH, an estimated 400 000 cardiovascular disease events could be prevented over 10 years.10 This may be an overestimate given the reduction in cardiovascular disease events that has occurred during the past 14 years. Nevertheless, considering heart disease’s long-standing position as the leading cause of death in the United States, it is essential to continue efforts to improve population-wide adoption of DASH.

Acknowledgments

Funding/Support: Dr Steinberg was supported by the Building Interdisciplinary Research Careers in Women’s Health Career Development Award K12HD043446 from the National Institutes of Health.

Footnotes

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: All authors have completed and submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Dr Steinberg reported having equity in Scale Down LLC and having a patent pending for the system used as part of Scale Down LLC. Dr Bennett reported being a shareholder in Coeus Health and Scale Down LLC and serving on a scientific advisory board for Nutrisystem. No other disclosures were reported.

Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funder had no role in the preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Contributor Information

Dori Steinberg, Duke Global Digital Health Science Center, Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.

Gary G. Bennett, Duke Global Digital Health Science Center, Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; and Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.

Laura Svetkey, Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.

References

  • 1.Appel LJ, Moore TJ, Obarzanek E, et al. DASH Collaborative Research Group. A clinical trial of the effects of dietary patterns on blood pressure. N Engl J Med. 1997;336(16):1117–1124. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199704173361601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.James PA, Oparil S, Carter BL, et al. 2014 evidence-based guideline for the management of high blood pressure in adults: report from the panel members appointed to the Eighth Joint National Committee (JNC 8) JAMA. 2014;311(5):507–520. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.284427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Mellen PB, Gao SK, Vitolins MZ, Goff DC., Jr Deteriorating dietary habits among adults with hypertension: DASH dietary accordance, NHANES 1988–1994 and 1999–2004. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(3):308–314. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2007.119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kim H, Andrade FC. Diagnostic status of hypertension on the adherence to the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet. Prev Med Rep. 2016;4:525–531. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2016.09.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mozaffarian D, Benjamin EJ, Go AS, et al. Writing Group Members; American Heart Association Statistics Committee; Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Executive summary: heart disease and stroke statistics—2016 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2016;133(4):447–454. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Young CM, Batch BC, Svetkey LP. Effect of socioeconomic status on food availability and cost of the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) dietary pattern. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2008;10(8):603–611. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2008.08199.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bell RA, Kravitz RL. Physician counseling for hypertension: what do doctors really do? Patient Educ Couns. 2008;72(1):115–121. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.01.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Pew Research Center. [Accessed February 1, 2017];Mobile fact sheet. http://www.pewinternet.org/fact-sheet/mobile/. Published January 12, 2017.
  • 9.Burke LE, Styn MA, Sereika SM, et al. Using mHealth technology to enhance self-monitoring for weight loss: a randomized trial. Am J Prev Med. 2012;43(1):20–26. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.03.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Erlinger TP, Vollmer WM, Svetkey LP, Appel LJ. The potential impact of nonpharmacologic population-wide blood pressure reduction on coronary heart disease events: pronounced benefits in African-Americans and hypertensives. Prev Med. 2003;37(4):327–333. doi: 10.1016/s0091-7435(03)00140-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES