Abstract
The morphogenic factor Sonic hedgehog (Shh) signals through the primary cilium, which relies on intraflagellar transport to maintain its structural integrity and function. However, the process by which protein and lipid cargos are delivered to the primary cilium from their sites of synthesis still remains poorly characterized. Here, we report that diacylglycerol kinase δ (DGKδ), a residential lipid kinase in the endoplasmic reticulum, triggers the release of IFT88-containing vesicles from the ER exit sites (ERES), thereby setting forth their movement to the primary cilium. Encoded by the gene whose mutations originally implicated the primary cilium as the venue of Shh signaling, IFT88 is known to be part of the complex B that drives the anterograde transport within cilia. We show that IFT88 interacts with DGKδ, and is associated with COPII-coated vesicles at the ERES. Using a combination of RNAi silencing and gene knockout strategies, we further show that DGKδ is required for supporting Shh signaling both in vitro and in vivo, demonstrating the physiological significance of this regulation.
Introduction
The Hedgehog morphogenic pathway plays conserved roles in organizing tissue pattern formation and cell fate determination during the development of a diverse array of organisms1, 2. In vertebrates, signaling by Sonic hedgehog (Shh) occurs through the primary cilium3, 4, a flagellum-like structure on the surface of interphase cells with properties akin to a signaling center5, 6. The current paradigm entails ligand-induced movements of receptor Patched1 (Ptch1) out of and membrane-bound signal transducer Smoothened (Smo) into the primary cilium7–9. Other cytosolic components of the pathway, including downstream transcriptional factors Gli1, 2, 3 and Gli-binding protein, Suppressor of fused (Sufu), also traverse into the primary cilium upon ligand induction10–12. Trafficking of these diverse types of proteins is orchestrated by intraflagellar transport (IFT) complexes and motor proteins13, 14; however, its precise mechanism remains to be determined.
The primary cilium was originally implicated as the venue of Shh signaling through characterization of two induced mouse mutants, wimple and flexo/Polaris/Tg737, which encode IFT172 and IFT883, respectively, of a large multimeric complex that drives the anterograde ciliary movement along the microtubule-based axoneme15. Mouse mutants with different IFT88 lesions exhibit a wide range of phenotypes from polycystic kidney disease and retinal degeneration to abnormal brain morphology and preaxial polydactyly associated with disruption of Shh signaling16, 17. Mechanistically, IFT88 is essential for the assembly of the primary cilium, and the maintenance of its dynamic structural integrity3, 17, 18. Because no bio-synthetic machinery is present in cilia, all proteins must be imported into cilium by consecutive IFT movements across a basal barrier that effectively seals the primary cilium into a membrane-enclosed organelle6, 19. The sequence of many IFT proteins shares a common ancestry with vesicle coats of COPI, COPII and clathrin vesicles20, 21, which suggests that IFT proteins may also play a role in vesicular transport. This notion is supported by recent evidence implicating IFT20, IFT88 as well as IFT57 in exocytosis to facilitate the formation of and direct T-cell receptor targeting to immune synapses in T lymphocytes22. Moreover, a recent attempt at understanding causes of the Usher syndrome, a hereditary combined hearing and vision loss, identified IFT88 at the endoplasmic reticulum (ER)23, further lending evidence to a likely role in trafficking outside the primary cilium.
Here, we report a novel IFT88-binding protein diacylglycerol kinase δ (DGKδ), identified through affinity purification and mass spectrum analysis. A member of the DGK family lipid kinases that catalyze the conversion of diacylglycerol to phosphatidic acid24, DGKδ is a residential ER protein25. We show that IFT88 is associated with COPII-coated vesicles and it interacts with DGKδ at the ER exit site (ERES). The kinase activity of DGKδ is required for triggering the release of IFT88-containing COPII vesicles, thereby setting forth their movement toward the primary cilium. This process is essential to the structural and functional integrity of the primary cilium, henceforth Shh signaling.
Results
IFT88 is associated with ER and ER-derived COPII vesicles
To gain a global insight of the intracellular movement of IFT88, we conducted a survey of its localization in subcellular organelles in NIH3T3 cells using immunofluorescence microscopy. In addition to the primary cilium, the IFT88 staining extensively overlapped with that of SEC13 and SEC31A, both of which are part of the COPII-coated vesicles (Figs 1A,B, and S1A). The presence of IFT88 in the ER was also corroborated by the colocalization of endogenous IFT88 with the ER markers, DsRed-ER and Calnexin, as determined by immunofluorescence imaging (Fig. 1C and D), but the IFT88 staining did not overlap with markers for the Golgi apparatus (CFP-Gal, CFP-TGN38), endosomes (Lamp1, Rab5, Rab7) or Clathrin-coated vesicles (antibody against Clathrin heavy chain) (sFig. S1B–G). Biochemical fractionation experiments in NIH3T3 cells also showed association of IFT88 with Sec13+ microsomes but not mitochondria (Fig. 1E), thus corroborating the association of IFT88 with the ER and COPII vesicles. Finally, co-IP experiments using exogenously expressed FLAG-IFT88, GFP-Sec13, and CFP-SEC31A showed a physical interaction between IFT88 and the latter two proteins (Fig. 1F and G). Taken together, our data demonstrate that IFT88 is present in the ER and COPII vesicles and implicate IFT88 in transporting cargos from the ER to cilia by COPII vesicles.
Identification of DGKδ as an interacting partner of IFT88
To further explore the role and regulation of IFT88 in transporting ER cargos, we sought new IFT88 interacting proteins by immunoprecipitation and mass spectrometry identification in NIH3T3 cell lysates (Fig. 2A and B). Comparing to non-specific proteins that precipitated with the IgG control, at least 3 were uniquely enriched by anti-IFT88, as shown in the silver-stained electrophoresis lanes; these 3 proteins were identified as DGKδ, IFT81, and Klra19, respectively (Fig. 2A and B). Since IFT81 is a known component of the IFT-B complex26, its presence validated our approach. However, we were intrigued by DGKδ, an ER-resident lipid kinase and a key enzyme in the phospholipid biosynthesis pathway responsible for converting diacylglycerol to phosphatidic acid25, given the distinct phospholipid composition of the primary cilium membrane27. Moreover, mice deficient in DGKδ were born with open eyelids at birth28, a phenotype that could result from defects in primary cilium signaling29. For these reasons, DGKδ was chosen for further characterization.
The family of diacylglycerol kinases contains 10 isoforms30. Co-IP experiments revealed that IFT88 binds to all 7 DGK isoforms that we analyzed (Fig. 2C). The primary sequence of IFT88 consists of 12 tetratricopeptide repeats (TPRs) arranged in two asymmetric clusters31, and deletion mapping indicated that these TPR repeats likely mediate the interaction with DGKδ (Fig. 2D and E). On the other hand, the catalytic and C-terminal domains of DGKδ likely mediate the interaction with IFT88, whereas the N-terminal domain does not bind IFT88 (Fig. 2F and G). This result is consistent with the fact that all DGK isoforms tested bind IFT88 (Fig. 2C), since the catalytic domain is a structural element common to all members of the DGK family24.
IFT88 and DGKδ are colocalized at the ER exit site
Having confirmed the interaction between IFT88 and DGKδ, we moved on to ascertain if and where the two proteins coexist in a complex at the ER. Confocal imaging showed that exogenously expressed HA-tagged DGKδ and GFP-tagged IFT88 were primarily co-localized in the perinuclear region marked by an ER marker Calnexin in NIH3T3 cells (Fig. 3A), but not at primary cilia (sFig. S2). The colocalization between IFT88 and DGKδ was further demonstrated by the proximity ligation assay (PLA), which also showed that the IFT88 and DGKδ complex was primarily present in the perinuclear region (Fig. 3B and C).
The COPII-coated vesicles are known to originate from the ER32. Since our data indicated that IFT88 is a component of the COPII vesicles, the interaction with IFT88 implies that DGKδ may participate in the regulation of COPII vesicle assembly or the release of COPII vesicles from the ER exit site (ERES) before they embark on secretory pathways. Indeed, immunofluorescence microscopy in transiently transfected NIH3T3 cells showed that both IFT88 and HA-DGKδ were co-localized with EGFP-SEC16A, which is a well-recognized marker for the ERES33 (Fig. 3D and E). Moreover, HA-DGKδ was also found co-localized with GFP-SEC13 (Fig. 3F), the marker of COPII-coated vesicle. Co-IP experiments confirmed the physical interaction of SEC16A to IFT88 and DGKδ, respectively (Fig. 3G and H), as well as SEC13 to DGKδ (Fig. 3I). Interestingly, experiments using equilibrium centrifugation through the iodixanol density gradient showed that DGKδ co-sedimented primarily in the heavy fractions labeled by the ER marker Calnexin, while IFT88 and SEC13 were mostly distributed in the lighter fractions (Fig. 3J). Taken together, our results indicated that while the majority of IFT88 likely exists in the free moving COPII vesicles, a fraction of which is associated with DGKδ in the ER at the ERES. These data suggest that DGKδ likely plays a role in the assembly of the IFT88-containing COPII vesicles or their release from the ER.
DGKδ promotes the release of COPII vesicle from the ER
To ascertain if DGKδ indeed plays a role in the assembly of COPII vesicles or their release from the ER, we compared the localization of endogenous IFT88 at COPII vesicles marked by SEC13 in DGKδ−/− and matching wild type control MEFs. The results showed that in the absence of DGKδ, there is a 30% reduction of IFT88 presence in COPII vesicles, as evident from the calculation of the colocalization coefficient of IFT88 and SEC13 (Fig. 4A and B). Proximity ligation assay confirmed the reduction in the colocalization between IFT88 and SEC13 in DGKδ−/− MEFs (Fig. 4C and D). Using DsRed-ER to decorate the ER, we found that the ER volume in DGKδ−/− MEFs was significantly enlarged compared to that in the wild type controls (Fig. 4E and F), and moreover, the expression of Hspa5, a marker of ER stress34, also increased significantly (Fig. 4G). This observation was likely caused by an impairment of COPII vesicles-mediated export that rendered the ER swollen. To directly distinguish if the defect caused by the loss of DGKδ is associated with the assembly or the release of COPII vesicles, we conducted an ER transport assay in DGKδ−/− and wild type control MEFs employing an temperature sensitive mutant, GFP-tagged VSVgts045, which is retained in the ER when the cells are cultured at the non-permissive temperature of 40 °C, but moves out of the ER to Golgi apparatus at the permissive 32 °C35. Secretary proteins such as VSVg are glycosylated concurrent with their synthesis in the rough ER and thus are sensitive to digestion by Endoglycosylase H (Endo H) until they enter the Golgi apparatus, where the oligosaccharide side chains are modified36. Indeed, upon adding cycloheximide to inhibit protein synthesis and switching to permissive temperature of 32 °C, we found that GFP-VSVgts045 began to gradually lose its sensitivity to Endo H until that sensitivity was completely lost within 2 hours of temperature shift in control wildtype MEFs, but the Endo H sensitivity persisted beyond this time frame in DGKδ−/− MEFs (Fig. 4H), implying a blockage or at least a delay of ER export. Furthermore, we quantified the impact of DGKδ depletion on the COPII vesicle formation out of the ER membrane in a reconstituted in vitro “budding” system using the total membrane fractions isolated from DGKδ−/− and wild type control MEFs supplemented with ATP-regenerating system and rat liver lysates37. After the budding reaction, we isolated the COPII vesicles of the microsome fraction and quantified the contents of Sec13, IFT88, and the ER-Golgi intermediate compartment (ERGIC) marker protein ERGIC53 enriched therein by Western blot. The results showed less COPII vesicle budding in the absence of DGKδ as evident by the reduced budding to total ratios of the three marker proteins (Fig. 4I and J). Finally, in the iodixanol density gradient equilibrium centrifugation experiment, while the majority of both IFT88 and SEC13 were associated with free COPII vesicles in normal MEFs, a significant fraction of these two proteins were retained in the ER in DGKδ−/− MEFs (Fig. 4K). Taken together, these results suggest that DGKδ is required to trigger the release of IFT88-containing COPII vesicles from the ER.
DGKδ is required for the assembly and function of primary cilia
To determine if the DGKδ-mediated release of the IFT88-containing COPII vesicles affects cilium formation and function, we examined the physical properties of the primary cilium in WT and DGKδ−/− MEFs. The results showed that in the absence of DGKδ, both the cilium length and the IFT88 content decreased significantly (Fig. 5A–C). To ascertain if these observations were consequential to the specific loss of DGKδ, we reintroduced the GFP-tagged, wildtype DGKδ or DGKδG337D, a mutant defective in kinase activity, into DGKδ−/− MEFs and found that wildtype DGKδ was able to rescue the cilium length defect, but DGKδG337D was not (Fig. 5D). Because the total level of IFT88 protein remained comparable between DGKδ−/− and the normal control MEFs (sFig. S3), the shortening of the cilium length could be the consequence of the reduced intraflagellar transport, which is known to be required for maintaining the integrity of the dynamic ciliary structure38. To test this explanation, we carried out fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) measurement of the ciliary import of IFT88-GFP in DGKδ−/− and normal MEFs by recording the accumulation of GFP fluorescence in the entire primary cilium every 30 seconds for 10 consecutive minutes after photobleaching (Fig. 5E). The results showed a clear reduction in the rate by which IFT88-GFP was reimported back into the primary cilium in DGKδ−/− MEFs (Fig. 5F). These results indicated that loss of DGKδ indeed caused a curtailment of IFT88 trafficking into the primary cilium, hence the shortening of ciliary length.
Movement of IFT vesicles from the Golgi apparatus to the primary cilium has been reported in the literature19, 39. This is exemplified by the ciliary import of Somatostatin receptor R3 (SSTR3) that follows the conventional route of secretory pathway40. On the other hand, the incorporation of Peripherin/rds into the outer segment of photoreceptor cells follows an unconventional secretary route that bypasses the Golgi41. Since the outer segment of a photoreceptor is a specialized primary cilium, we compared the levels of GFP-Peripherin/rds and GFP-SSTR3 in the primary cilium of DGKδ−/− MEFs to assess the requirement of DGKδ by these two alternative transport routes. Our data showed a robust presence of GFP-Peripherin/rds in the primary cilia of normal MEFs as expected, but its level in DGKδ−/− MEFs was reduced considerably (Fig. 5G and H). In contrast, the levels of GFP-SSTR3 in the primary cilium were comparable in both cell types (Fig. 5G and H). These results strongly support the notion that DGKδ controls the ER release of IFT vesicles destined to the primary cilium.
DGKδ is required for Shh signaling
To assess the functional significance of the role of DGKδ, we carried out a number of loss-of-function studies of Shh signaling. First, siRNA-mediated knockdown of DGKδ blunted the ability of Shh to induce the expression of Gli1, a well-known pathway target42 (Fig. 6A and B). Second, pharmacological intervention with two pan-DGK inhibitors, R59022 and R59949, showed specific inhibition of the Shh pathway activation assessed by the 8xGBS-luc reporter assay12 (Fig. 6C and D), and Western analysis of endogenous Gli1 protein levels (Fig. 6E and F). Interestingly, the pathway activation by the ligand (ShhN conditioned medium) showed much higher sensitivity to these two compounds than that by SAG, an agonist of the Shh pathway signal transducer Smo43 (Fig. 6C and D). Third, we reconstituted Smo−/− MEFs with a GFP-Smo expression construct in an attempt at generating a marked Smo stable cell line with Shh responsiveness. These cells exhibited about 2-fold increase in GFP-Smo fluorescence intensity in the primary cilium upon ShhN induction (Fig. 6G and H); however, treatment with DGK inhibitors blocked such induction. Moreover, blocking DGKδ kinase activity with the inhibitors also reduced the ciliary accumulation of endogenous Gli3 induced by ShhN (Fig. 6I and J), another established Shh signaling response10. Finally, we isolated cerebellar granule cell precursors (GCPs) from developing 7 days old pups, and cultured them in vitro. These cells absolutely depend on Shh for sustaining their survival and growth in culture44. When we knocked down the expression of DGKδ using siRNAs, the growth of GCPs was substantially compromised to the same extent as knockdown of IFT88 (Fig. 6K). Taken together, both reduction of DGKδ’s expression or blocking its kinase activity negatively affected Shh signaling, demonstrating a requirement of this kinase activity.
Discussion
Although characterization of flexo/Polaris/Tg737 mutants led to the first insight of the primary cilium as the venue of Shh signaling over a decade ago3, the precise function of IFT88 was still not clear. In an attempt at identifying direct link between IFT88 and components of the Shh pathway, we serendipitously discovered DGKδ as a novel binding partner of IFT88. Our data indicate that IFT88 is present in the COPII-coated vesicles and DGKδ plays a critical role in releasing these vesicles from the ER, thus setting forth their movement into the primary cilium. Since the biosynthetic machinery is not present inside cilia, transport by IFT88-containing vesicles is essential not only for the delivery of protein and lipid cargos, but also the maintenance of ciliary structure and function required for supporting Shh signaling.
Despite the name-sake, IFT proteins share sequence homology with coat proteins of intracellular vesicle and have been implicated in transport underlying exocytosis20, 39, 45. For instance, IFT20 was found in post-Golgi membrane compartments and has been shown to guide vesicles transport between the Golgi apparatus and cilium basal body as well as centrosomes in both ciliated and non-ciliated cells22, 46. During the formation of immune synapses, IFT88 was reported to be associated with IFT20 and IFT57 in the recycling endosomes22. In a study of USHER syndrome, IFT88 was reported to form a complex with Cdh23, Harmonin and Myo7aa to mediate the trafficking of USH proteins from the ER to the ER-Golgi intermediate compartment (ERGIC)23. Our data clearly showed that IFT88 is associated with the ER as well as ER-derived COPII vesicles (Figs 1A–D and 4I), and colocalization with SEC16A (Fig. 3D), a marker of ERES, strongly suggests that IFT88 is likely incorporated into COP II vesicles at the ER exit sites. Furthermore, our data also indicated that the DGKδ-mediated release of IFT88-containing COPII vesicles from ERES plays a critical role in the maintenance of cilium length and function, despite its site of action situates several steps upstream from cilia, implying a coordinated control between the biosynthesis activity at the ER and the assembly and function of the primary cilium.
Small GTPases-driven vesicular transport is known to be the main route that delivers various protein and lipid cargos from their site of synthesis in the cell body to the primary cilium47, but recent data have implicated IFT20 in transporting cargos from the Golgi or post-Golgi membrane compartments to the primary cilium as well22, 46, 48. Our finding of IFT88-containing COPII vesicles revealed another important pathway for supplying cilium assembly and function. Despite repeated effort, we did not find IFT88 associated with any Golgi marker, suggesting the IFT88-mediated transport is completely separate from that of IFT20. It is conceivable that these two different transporting systems play complementary roles in delivering their respectively unique types of cargos, and are subject to different types of controls (Fig. 7). Recent data also revealed that certain transmembrane receptors, such as cilium-targeted peripherin in the retina, follow unconventional secretory pathways traversing directly from the ER to the plasma membrane, bypassing the Golgi41. A direct ER to cilia transport route could ensure a timely delivery of cargos to the plasma membrane or alternatively preserve protein activities by avoiding unnecessary processing in the Golgi. In this regard, the IFT88-mediated transport of peripherin/rds to the primary cilium offers a good example.
Out of the ten DGKs encoded in the mammalian genomes, only DGKδ and DGKε have been reported in the ER25, 49. Although one study showed that overexpressing DGKδ caused a decrease in the ER export25, the precise function of this lipid kinase is not clear. We show here that the DGKδ is associated with Sec16 at the ER exit site and its kinase activity is required for releasing IFT88/Sec13 vesicles, thus triggering ER export. Besides protein synthesis, ER is also the site for synthesis of phospholipids, the composition of which in the ciliary membrane is very important for its function50, 51. We can speculate that IFT88-containing vesicles might supply the primary cilium membrane with unique phospholipid composition as these vesicles fuse with the basal body. Using a combination of molecule inhibitors, siRNA-mediated gene silencing as well as gene knockout approaches, we demonstrated that Shh signaling can be strongly inhibited both in vitro and in vivo by the blockade of DGKδ kinase activity, despite the functional redundancy. Thus, these DGK blocking compounds or their derivatives offer a new way of treating cancers derived from inappropriate Shh signaling.
Materials and Methods
Cells and plasmids
HEK293 and NIH3T3 cells were purchased from ATCC, and DGKδ−/− MEFs were provided to us as a generous gift from Dr. Matthew K. Topham28. Gli-Luc 3T3 cells were obtained from StemRD. Smo-GFP stable cells were derived from Smo−/− MEFs by stable transfection. PCMV-IFT88-3XFLAG expression vector was obtained from Dr. Gregory J. Pazour, and pCMV5-HA-hDGKα, β, γ, δ, ε, ζ, ι vectors were obtained from Dr. Robert J. Lefkowitz. IFT88 deletion constructs (ΔTPR1, ΔTPR2, ΔTPR1&2, Δ293~400) were generated by PCR from pCMV-IFT88-3XFLAG and subcloned into the pRK1F vector. GFP-IFT88 was subcloned in pEGFPN1. DGKδ deletion constructs (N-terminal, catalytic domain, and C-terminal) were generated by PCR and subcloned into pRK2H. SEC13 cDNA was generated from NIH3T3 total RNA and the GFP- SEC13 expression unit was subcloned in pEGFPN1. GFP-Sec16A and EGFP-VSVG plasmids were obtained from Addgene. DsRed-ER, CFP-Gal, CFP-TGN38 constructs were provided by Dr. Li Yu (Tsinghua University, China).
siRNA mediated knockdown and real-time qPCR
Target sequences of DGKδ-specific siRNAs are siDGKd-1, AAGACUUGUGGCAGCGUGUUA and siDGKd-2, CAGCUCCAUCAUUCGAUGAUA. Both siRNAs were purchased from Qiagen (Gaithersburg, MD). The target sequence of IFT88-specific siRNA is: ACUGGGAGAGUUAUACGAU, which was purchased from Ribo, Ltd (China). Levels of mRNAs were determined by real-time qPCR using the FastStart SYBR Green Master mix (Roche) on a 7500 Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems). The sequences of PCR primer pairs are: mouse DGKδ (GCCGACAACAGGAAAGAAATG, TTGGGTAGGCTCAAAATGCTC), mouse Gli1 (GCTTGGATGAAGGACCTTGTG, GCTGATCCAGCCTAAGGTTCTC), and mouse HPRT (TATGGACAGGACTGAAAGAC, TAATCCAGCAGGTCAGCAAA), mouse hspa5 (CTGGACTGAATGTCATGAGGATCA, CTCTTATCCAGGCCATATGCAATAG). In each experiment, measurements were repeated at least three times, and each data point consists of triplicate samples.
Immunoflurescence
NIH3T3 or MEFs were seeded on glasses and cultured for 24 hours prior to transfection with Fugene HD (Promega). The cells were allowed to recover for 24 to 36 hours. To visualize ciliary proteins, transfected cells were serum-starved in DMEM containing 0.5% FBS for 24 hours before other treatments. Fixation was done in 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 minutes at room temperature, permeablized with 0.3% Triton X-100 in PBS for another 10 minutes, followed by standard procedures for immunostaining. Primary antibodies used were rabbit anti-IFT88 (1:100; Proteintech), goat anti-SEC13 (1:50; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.), rabbit anti-Calnexin (1:100, Proteintech), rabbit anti-Clathrin heavy chain (1:200; Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA)), rat anti-HA (1:300; Roche), mouse anti-acetylated Tubulin (1:1000; Sigma), rabbit anti-Gli3 (1:500; R&D (Minneapolis, MN)). Alexa-coupled secondary antibodies were purchased from Life Technologies Corp. Fluorescence images were captured using a laser scanning confocal microscope (LSM 710; Carl Zeiss) with a 63 × 1.4 numerical aperture (NA) oil objective and images were analyzed using software Zeiss ZEN 2011. Colocalization was quantified by software Image-pro as described52.
Cell fractionation
NIH3T3 cells were homogenized in 0.25M sucrose, 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH7.4, plus 1x Roche cOmplete Protease Inhibitor Cocktail, and cleared by centrifugation at 800 g at 4 °C for 10 minutes. Mitochondria were pelleted by centrifugation at 10,000 g at 4 °C for 20 minutes. The supernatant fraction was centrifuged again for 4 hours at 100,000 g to isolate cytosolic and microsome fractions.
Mass spectrometry analysis of IFT88 binding proteins
Endogenous IFT88 in NIH3T3 cell lysates was immunoprecipitated with anti-IFT88 (Proteintech), resolved by 10% SDS-PAGE gel and silver-stained. The unique bands in the anti-IFT88 lane were from excised and sent for LC/MS-MS analysis.
Immunoprecipitation
The cells were lysed in RIPA (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA pH 8.0, 1% NP-40, 0.5% Sodium Deoxycholate, and 1 x Roche cOmplete Protease Inhibitor Cocktail). For figure2A, NIH3T3 cell lysates (500 ul, 1 mg/ml) were precipitated with 2 ul normal IgG control or anti-IFT88 (4 °C overnight with protein A agarose beads) and subjected to PAGE resolving and silver staining. For the others, desired proteins (500 ml, 1 mg/ml) were immunopurified with 2 ul anti-Flag M2 agarose beads (Sigma) or 2 ul anti-HA (Roche) with protein G agarose beads (Millipore) as indicated. The isolated proteins in the pellet were analyzed by Western analysis.
Proximity ligation assay
Cells were cultured, transfected and stained with primary antibodies as described under the Immunofluorescence. The cells were then incubated with secondary antibodies conjugated with oligonucleotides (PLA probe MINUS and PLA probe PLUS) in Duolink® In Situ PLA® Probe reagents (Sigma). The oligonucleotides ligation, amplification and fluorescently labeling were performed with Duolink® In Situ detection reagent (Sigma). The images were captured on a Carl Zeiss LSM710 microscope using a 63×, 1.4 numerical aperture (NA) oil objective.
OptiPrep™ Density gradient sedimentation
Iodixanol density gradient sedimentation was carried as described53. Briefly, NIH3T3 or MEF cells were homogenized in 0.25 M sucrose, 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 1× Roche cOmplete Protease Inhibitor Cocktail and centrifuged at 800 g at 4 °C for 10 minutes to isolate postnuclear supernatant. OptiPrep gradient of 5–30% (5% increment and 1.5 ml for each gradient step) was placed in ultracentrifuge tubes (Beckman), and 3 ml of postnuclear supernatant was overlaid on top of the gradient. After centrifugation at 40,000 rpm for 4 hours at 4 °C in an SW 41 Ti rotor on Beckman Optima L-100 XP ultracentrifuge, the gradient was collected in 12 equal volume fractions using a peristaltic pump from the bottom of the tube. Proteins in each fraction were then analyzed by Western blot.
Live cell imaging and FRAP
DGKδ+/+ and DGKδ−/− MEFs were seeded in Lab-Tek chambered slides and transfected with GFP-IFT88. After reaching confluency, the cells were serum-starved in DMEM containing 0.5% FBS for 24 hours to induce cilia. To capture live cell images, the cells were incubated in CO2-independent medium (Life Technologies) and placed on a heating stage pre-warmed to 37 °C during images capture using Carl Zeiss LSM710 microscope live cell confocal imaging work station. Primary cilia were identified in the 488nm channel based on IFT88-GFP fluorescence. Photobleaching experiments were carried out using the FRAP module of the Marianas system. Equivalent laser intensity, repetition, and exposure time were used for FRAP experiments. Bleached regions were accurately positioned along each cilium at a 30-second interval for 10 consecutive minutes.
VSVg Endo H sensitivity
DGKδ+/+ and DGKδ−/− MEFs were transfected with GFP-VSVgts045 plasmid using Lipofectamine and PLUS (Invitrogen). Immediately after transfection, the cells were incubated at 40 °C to allow GFP-VSVgts045 protein to accumulate in the ER. Twenty-four hours after incubation at 40 °C, the cells were transferred to the permissive temperature at 32 °C for the appropriate time period (0 h, 0.5 h, 1 h, 2 h). Cells were then transferred to ice, and washed twice with ice-cold PBS and lysed for protein collection. After protein concentration determination using the Bradford assay (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA), equal amounts of protein from all samples were treated or mocktreated with Endoglycosidase H (Roche, Indianapolis, IN, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Samples were subjected to western blot analysis using anti-GFP (Sigma) and anti-actin antibodies.
Cell free COPII budding assay
DGKδ−/− and matching wildtype control MEFs grown to 70–80% confluency were washed once with PBS, scraped into PBS (5 ml/dish), pooled, and harvested at 1000 × g for 5 min at 4 °C. The pellet was resuspended in PBS (0.5 ml/dish) and centrifuged again at 1000 × g for 5 min at 4 °C. The pellet was then resuspended in Buffer F (10 mm HEPES-KOH (pH 7.2), 250 mm sorbitol, 10 mm potassium acetate, 1.5 mm magnesium acetate plus protease inhibitor mixture), passed through a 22-gauge needle 20 times, and centrifuged at 1000 × g for 5 min at 4 °C. The post nuclear supernatant fraction was transfered into siliconized microcentrifuge tubes, and microsomes were sedimented at 6000 × g for 10 min at 4 °C. Harvested microsomes were washed twice with Buffer G (20 mm HEPES-KOH (pH 7.2), 250 mm sorbitol, 150 mm potassium acetate, 0.5 mm magnesium acetate plus protease inhibitor mixture, and the pellet was resuspended in Buffer G (30 μl/dish). 30 ul of microsomes was used for each in vitro vesicle-formation reaction. Equal amount of protein in the microsome fraction was used in each assay. The budding reaction was assembled using rat liver cytosol (Invitrogen) at 4 mg/ml and an ATP-regenerating system (Boston Biochem, 1:10) on ice and then incubated for 30 min at 30 °C. The donor membrane were removed by a 20-min 12,000 × g centrifugation, and the supernatant fraction was further centrifuged for 30 min at 55,000 rpm at 4 °C using a TLA100 rotor in a Beckman Optima TLX ultracentrifuge to sediment the vesicle products. At last the samples were subjected to western blot analysis with anti-IFT88, anti-Sec13, anti-ERGIC53/58.
GCP isolation and proliferation assay
Mouse cerebellar GCPs isolation assay were performed as described54. Cerebella were dissected out from 6-day-old pups, incubated with Trypsin/DNAse buffer at 37 °C for 5 minutes and squeezed through a fine Pasteur pipette to obtain single-cell suspension. To separate different types of cells, the suspension was overlaid on top of 35% and 60% Percoll step gradient and centrifuged at 2,000 g for 10 minutes at 4 °C. GCP cells were harvested from the 60% percoll gradient fraction and further purified by depleting adherent cells with two consecutive 1-hour incubations in tissue culture dishes. For EdU(5-ethynyl-2′-deoxyuridine) incorporation assay, purified GCP cells were seeded in 24-well plates pre-coated with poly D-lysine and Matrigel solution, and incubate at 37 °C, 5% CO2. After 1 hour, GCP cells were transfected with siRNAs using FugeneHD Transfection Reagent (Promega) in the plates and the proliferation of GCPs at different time points was detected using Click-iT EdU cell proliferation assays (Life Technologies).
Electronic supplementary material
Acknowledgements
We wish to thank Drs. Matthew K. Topham, Gregory J. Pazour, Robert J. Lefkowitz, Jeremy F. Reiter, and Li Yu for generous reagents. This work is supported by grants from the National Natural Science foundation of China grants 81272238 and 81672748 (SYC), and the National Basic Research Program of China 2012CB945003 (SYC).
Author Contributions
J.D. conducted most of the experiments, analyzed the results, and co-wrote the manuscript. L.S., Y.Y., X.T., H.L., S.Y., and L.X. conducted some experiments. S.Y.C. conceived the idea for the project, analyzed the data, and wrote the paper with J.D.
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Footnotes
Electronic supplementary material
Supplementary information accompanies this paper at doi:10.1038/s41598-017-05680-8
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Jiang J, Hui CC. Hedgehog signaling in development and cancer. Developmental cell. 2008;15:801–812. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2008.11.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Cohen MM., Jr. Hedgehog signaling update. American journal of medical genetics. Part A. 2010;152a:1875–1914. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.32909. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Huangfu D, et al. Hedgehog signalling in the mouse requires intraflagellar transport proteins. Nature. 2003;426:83–87. doi: 10.1038/nature02061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Corbit KC, et al. Vertebrate Smoothened functions at the primary cilium. Nature. 2005;437:1018–1021. doi: 10.1038/nature04117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Goetz SC, Anderson KV. The primary cilium: a signalling centre during vertebrate development. Nature reviews. Genetics. 2010;11:331–344. doi: 10.1038/nrg2774. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Nachury MV, Seeley ES, Jin H. Trafficking to the ciliary membrane: how to get across the periciliary diffusion barrier? Annual review of cell and developmental biology. 2010;26:59–87. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.042308.113337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Rohatgi R, Milenkovic L, Scott MP. Patched1 regulates hedgehog signaling at the primary cilium. Science (New York, N.Y.) 2007;317:372–376. doi: 10.1126/science.1139740. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kovacs JJ, et al. Beta-arrestin-mediated localization of smoothened to the primary cilium. Science (New York, N.Y.) 2008;320:1777–1781. doi: 10.1126/science.1157983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Mukhopadhyay S, Rohatgi R. G-protein-coupled receptors, Hedgehog signaling and primary cilia. Seminars in cell & developmental biology. 2014;33:63–72. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2014.05.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Haycraft CJ, et al. Gli2 and Gli3 localize to cilia and require the intraflagellar transport protein polaris for processing and function. PLoS genetics. 2005;1:e53. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0010053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.May SR, et al. Loss of the retrograde motor for IFT disrupts localization of Smo to cilia and prevents the expression of both activator and repressor functions of Gli. Developmental biology. 2005;287:378–389. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2005.08.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Chen Y, et al. Dual Phosphorylation of suppressor of fused (Sufu) by PKA and GSK3beta regulates its stability and localization in the primary cilium. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2011;286:13502–13511. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.217604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Rosenbaum JL, Witman GB. Intraflagellar transport. Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology. 2002;3:813–825. doi: 10.1038/nrm952. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Silverman MA, Leroux MR. Intraflagellar transport and the generation of dynamic, structurally and functionally diverse cilia. Trends in cell biology. 2009;19:306–316. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2009.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Pedersen LB, Rosenbaum JL. Intraflagellar transport (IFT) role in ciliary assembly, resorption and signalling. Current topics in developmental biology. 2008;85:23–61. doi: 10.1016/S0070-2153(08)00802-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Schrick JJ, et al. Characterization of the human homologue of the mouse Tg737 candidate polycystic kidney disease gene. Hum Mol Genet. 1995;4:559–567. doi: 10.1093/hmg/4.4.559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Pazour GJ, et al. The intraflagellar transport protein, IFT88, is essential for vertebrate photoreceptor assembly and maintenance. The Journal of cell biology. 2002;157:103–113. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200107108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Lepanto P, Davison C, Casanova G, Badano JL, Zolessi FR. Characterization of primary cilia during the differentiation of retinal ganglion cells in the zebrafish. Neural development. 2016;11:10. doi: 10.1186/s13064-016-0064-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Pazour GJ, Bloodgood RA. Targeting proteins to the ciliary membrane. Current topics in developmental biology. 2008;85:115–149. doi: 10.1016/S0070-2153(08)00805-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Jekely G, Arendt D. Evolution of intraflagellar transport from coated vesicles and autogenous origin of the eukaryotic cilium. BioEssays: news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology. 2006;28:191–198. doi: 10.1002/bies.20369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Satir P, Mitchell DR, Jekely G. How did the cilium evolve? Current topics in developmental biology. 2008;85:63–82. doi: 10.1016/S0070-2153(08)00803-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Finetti F, et al. Intraflagellar transport is required for polarized recycling of the TCR/CD3 complex to the immune synapse. Nature cell biology. 2009;11:1332–1339. doi: 10.1038/ncb1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Blanco-Sanchez B, Clement A, Fierro J, Jr., Washbourne P, Westerfield M. Complexes of Usher proteins preassemble at the endoplasmic reticulum and are required for trafficking and ER homeostasis. Disease models & mechanisms. 2014;7:547–559. doi: 10.1242/dmm.014068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Merida I, Avila-Flores A, Merino E. Diacylglycerol kinases: at the hub of cell signalling. The Biochemical journal. 2008;409:1–18. doi: 10.1042/BJ20071040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Nagaya H, Wada I, Jia YJ, Kanoh H. Diacylglycerol kinase delta suppresses ER-to-Golgi traffic via its SAM and PH domains. Molecular biology of the cell. 2002;13:302–316. doi: 10.1091/mbc.01-05-0255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Follit JA, Xu F, Keady BT, Pazour GJ. Characterization of mouse IFT complex B. Cell motility and the cytoskeleton. 2009;66:457–468. doi: 10.1002/cm.20346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Nakatsu F. A Phosphoinositide Code for Primary Cilia. Developmental cell. 2015;34:379–380. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2015.08.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Crotty T, et al. Diacylglycerol kinase delta regulates protein kinase C and epidermal growth factor receptor signaling. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2006;103:15485–15490. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0604104103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ohuchi H. Wakayama Symposium: Epithelial-mesenchymal interactions in eyelid development. The ocular surface. 2012;10:212–216. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2012.07.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Topham MK, Epand RM. Mammalian diacylglycerol kinases: molecular interactions and biological functions of selected isoforms. Biochimica et biophysica acta. 2009;1790:416–424. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2009.01.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Taschner M, Bhogaraju S, Vetter M, Morawetz M, Lorentzen E. Biochemical mapping of interactions within the intraflagellar transport (IFT) B core complex: IFT52 binds directly to four other IFT-B subunits. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2011;286:26344–26352. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.254920. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.D’Arcangelo JG, Stahmer KR, Miller EA. Vesicle-mediated export from the ER: COPII coat function and regulation. Biochimica et biophysica acta. 2013;1833:2464–2472. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2013.02.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Iinuma T, et al. Mammalian Sec16/p250 plays a role in membrane traffic from the endoplasmic reticulum. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2007;282:17632–17639. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M611237200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Fujikawa T, Munakata T, Kondo S, Satoh N, Wada S. Stress response in the ascidian Ciona intestinalis: transcriptional profiling of genes for the heat shock protein 70 chaperone system under heat stress and endoplasmic reticulum stress. Cell stress & chaperones. 2010;15:193–204. doi: 10.1007/s12192-009-0133-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Presley JF, et al. ER-to-Golgi transport visualized in living cells. Nature. 1997;389:81–85. doi: 10.1038/38891. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Grieve, A. G. & Rabouille, C. Golgi bypass: skirting around the heart of classical secretion. Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology3, doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a005298 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 37.Cho HJ, et al. Leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 regulates Sec16A at ER exit sites to allow ER-Golgi export. The EMBO journal. 2014;33:2314–2331. doi: 10.15252/embj.201487807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Broekhuis JR, Leong WY, Jansen G. Regulation of cilium length and intraflagellar transport. International review of cell and molecular biology. 2013;303:101–138. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-407697-6.00003-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Baldari CT, Rosenbaum J. Intraflagellar transport: it’s not just for cilia anymore. Current opinion in cell biology. 2010;22:75–80. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2009.10.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Berbari NF, Johnson AD, Lewis JS, Askwith CC, Mykytyn K. Identification of ciliary localization sequences within the third intracellular loop of G protein-coupled receptors. Molecular biology of the cell. 2008;19:1540–1547. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E07-09-0942. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Tian G, et al. An unconventional secretory pathway mediates the cilia targeting of peripherin/rds. The Journal of neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 2014;34:992–1006. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3437-13.2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Lee J, Platt KA, Censullo P. & Ruiz i Altaba, A. Gli1 is a target of Sonic hedgehog that induces ventral neural tube development. Development (Cambridge, England) 1997;124:2537–2552. doi: 10.1242/dev.124.13.2537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Chen JK, Taipale J, Young KE, Maiti T, Beachy PA. Small molecule modulation of Smoothened activity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2002;99:14071–14076. doi: 10.1073/pnas.182542899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Wechsler-Reya RJ, Scott MP. Control of neuronal precursor proliferation in the cerebellum by Sonic Hedgehog. Neuron. 1999;22:103–114. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80682-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Sedmak T, Wolfrum U. Intraflagellar transport molecules in ciliary and nonciliary cells of the retina. The Journal of cell biology. 2010;189:171–186. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200911095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Follit JA, Tuft RA, Fogarty KE, Pazour GJ. The intraflagellar transport protein IFT20 is associated with the Golgi complex and is required for cilia assembly. Molecular biology of the cell. 2006;17:3781–3792. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E06-02-0133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Leroux MR. Taking vesicular transport to the cilium. Cell. 2007;129:1041–1043. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.05.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Follit JA, et al. The Golgin GMAP210/TRIP11 anchors IFT20 to the Golgi complex. PLoS genetics. 2008;4:e1000315. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Matsui H, et al. Role of the N-terminal hydrophobic residues of DGKepsilon in targeting the endoplasmic reticulum. Biochimica et biophysica acta. 2014;1842:1440–1450. doi: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2014.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Chavez M, et al. Modulation of Ciliary Phosphoinositide Content Regulates Trafficking and Sonic Hedgehog Signaling Output. Developmental cell. 2015;34:338–350. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2015.06.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Garcia-Gonzalo FR, et al. Phosphoinositides Regulate Ciliary Protein Trafficking to Modulate Hedgehog Signaling. Developmental cell. 2015;34:400–409. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2015.08.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Dunn KW, Kamocka MM, McDonald JH. A practical guide to evaluating colocalization in biological microscopy. American journal of physiology. Cell physiology. 2011;300:C723–742. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00462.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Li X, Donowitz M. Fractionation of subcellular membrane vesicles of epithelial and non-epithelial cells by OptiPrep density gradient ultracentrifugation. Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) 2014;1174:85–99. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-0944-5_6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Hatten ME, Shelanski ML. Mouse cerebellar granule neurons arrest the proliferation of human and rodent astrocytoma cells in vitro. The Journal of neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 1988;8:1447–1453. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.08-04-01447.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.