Abstract
Glaciological and oceanographic observations coupled with numerical models show that warm Circumpolar Deep Water (CDW) upwelling onto the West Antarctic continental shelf causes melting of the undersides of floating ice shelves. Because these ice shelves buttress glaciers feeding into them, their ocean-induced thinning is driving Antarctic ice-sheet loss today. Here we present the first multi-proxy data based reconstruction of variability in CDW inflow to the Amundsen Sea sector, the most vulnerable part of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet, during the last 11,000 years. The chemical composition of foraminifer shells and benthic foraminifer assemblages in marine sediments indicate that enhanced CDW upwelling, controlled by the latitudinal position of the Southern Hemisphere westerly winds, forced deglaciation of this sector both until 7,500 years ago, when an ice-shelf collapse may have caused rapid ice-sheet thinning further upstream, and since the 1940s. These results increase confidence in the predictive capability of current ice-sheet models.
Today ice discharge from glaciers flowing into the Amundsen Sea Embayment (ASE) (Fig. 1) is the main contributor to the negative mass balance of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet (WAIS) and global sea-level rise from Antarctica1. Rapid thinning, flow acceleration, and grounding-line retreat affecting ice streams and ice shelves in this region have increased since the early 1970s and contributed to global sea-level rise by, on average, ~0.23±0.02 mm/yr between 1992 and 20131–3. Recent modelling suggests that current ice loss of the Thwaites Glacier (Fig. 1), which rests on a bed that is well below sea level and slopes down into the interior of the ASE hinterland, will result in a (partial) WAIS collapse from as early as the 23rd century, thereby raising global sea level over centuries and millennia at rates ≥1 mm/yr (ref. 4). A similar study predicts that neighbouring Pine Island Glacier, which drains together with Thwaites Glacier into Pine Island Bay (PIB) in the eastern ASE (Fig. 1), will contribute ~3.5-10 mm to eustatic sea-level rise over the next two decades alone5. Depending on the future extent of atmospheric and oceanic warming, and the dominant processes of ice loss, Antarctica may contribute as much as 1 metre to global sea-level rise by the end of this century6.
Ocean-driven melting of the undersides of floating ice shelves buttressing the glaciers draining into the ASE has been identified as the main process responsible for the current mass loss. This melting is caused primarily by upwelling of relatively warm Circumpolar Deep Water (CDW) onto the continental shelf7–12. Inter-annual to inter-decadal changes in CDW upwelling onto the ASE shelf have been attributed to buoyancy changes9 and regional climate variability10. The latter is assumed to be controlled by latitudinal shifts in the Southern Hemisphere westerly winds (SHWW)11, possibly in response to the Southern Annular Mode and teleconnections to climate in the tropical Pacific12.
While West Antarctic ice cores provide high-resolution archives of atmospheric changes through the last glacial period to today13, satellite observations and in situ measurements of glaciological1–3 and oceanographic changes7,10 are restricted to the last ~30-40 years8,14. Until now, no data constrain CDW upwelling onto the inner ASE shelf prior to this time, and its role in driving centennial to millennial retreat of the WAIS remains unclear. This information, however, is crucial for verifying the reliability of the current generation of ice-sheet models which force WAIS deglaciation following the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM; 19-23 kyr BP) predominantly by ocean-induced melting15–17 and predict that this process will also drive future Antarctic ice loss in response to global warming18, at least during its initial phase6. Until now, simulations of ocean forcing have predominantly relied on estimates of deep-water temperatures derived from global climate models that are constrained by far-field oceanic records from outside the Southern Ocean and its complex circulation system6,15–17.
Foraminifer shell chemistry and seawater
Here we present the first direct evidence for variations in CDW heat supply onto the ASE shelf during the last 10.4 kyr. We measured the magnesium/calcium (Mg/Ca) ratio of calcareous shells of the epifaunal to shallow infaunal benthic foraminifer species Angulogerina angulosa (Methods) in core PS75/160 recovered just offshore from Pine Island Glacier19 (Fig. 1). The Mg/Ca data are used as a proxy for bottom-water temperature20 and thus inflow of CDW onto the ASE shelf (Methods). The low-resolution Mg/Ca record of core PS75/160 is supported by a high-resolution stable carbon isotope (δ13C) dataset obtained from calcareous shells of A. angulosa and the planktic foraminifer species Neogloboquadrina pachyderma sinistral from the same site and site PS75/167, which is located just offshore from Thwaites Glacier (Fig. 1). We utilize the benthic δ13C ratio as a proxy for the carbon isotope composition of the dissolved inorganic carbon (δ13CDIC) of the ambient seawater and thus, as a tracer for its source water mass. We also measured δ13C values of A. angulosa in modern sediments from site PS75/215 in PIB and on N. pachyderma sin. in recent sediments from site PS69/251 on the outer ASE shelf19,21 (Fig. 1).
Foraminiferal δ13C records from marine sediments are influenced by water-mass circulation in addition to vital effects, biological productivity, air-sea exchange of carbon, or a combination of these factors22–28. We corrected the δ13C data for species-inherent vital effects as follows: The δ13C signal of A. angulosa is known to be on average 0.44-0.60 ‰ lower than the δ13CDIC of ambient seawater, but this offset varies regionally23. Mackensen24 analysed the carbon isotope composition of the epibenthic foraminifer genus Cibicidoides spp., a reliable recorder of bottom water δ13CDIC, in core-top sediments from site PS2544 on the outer ASE shelf (Fig. 1). The measured δ13C value of +0.63 ‰ overlaps with the δ13CDIC range of ~0.3 to 0.6 ‰ reported for CDW25,26 when the analytical errors for δ13C measurements of seawater (±0.1 ‰) and foraminiferal calcite (±0.06 ‰) are taken into account24. In contrast, we measured a δ13C ratio of -0.22 ‰ on A. angulosa from modern sediments at site PS75/215. Because both core sites are currently bathed by CDW7–11, we applied an offset correction of +0.85 ‰ to our benthic δ13C data. Previous studies on N. pachyderma sin. shells from south of the Antarctic Polar Front27 and south of 70 °S (ref. 28), respectively, found a δ13C offset of -1.0 ‰ between the shells and the ambient surface waters. Accordingly, we corrected our planktic δ13C data by adding +1.0 ‰.
To evaluate the influence of past changes in biological productivity on the foraminiferal δ13C down-core record, we measured barium/titanium (Ba/Ti) ratios of cores PS75/160 and PS75/167 (Fig. 2, Extended Data Fig. 5) as the most reliable palaeoproductivity proxy in Antarctic continental margin sediments29. Furthermore, we examined the benthic foraminifer assemblages in sediments of core PS75/160 for evidence of environmental changes, especially whether an ice shelf covered PIB from ~12.3-11.2 kyr BP onwards30,31. Ice-shelf cover would have reduced the foraminiferal δ13C values by restricting air-sea gas exchange24,27. Cosmogenic isotope surface exposure dates obtained from erratic boulders in the Hudson Mountains near Pine Island Glacier (Fig. 1) suggest that such an ice shelf had buttressed grounded ice upstream from PIB and that its thinning or collapse between 8.3 and 7.5 ka triggered rapid ice-stream thinning by >100 m (ref. 31).
Age constraints on cores PS75/160 and PS75/167 are based on previously published19,21 and newly calibrated AMS 14C dates on calcareous microfossils (Extended Data Table 1). The recent chronology for core PS69/251, whose modern surface age has been confirmed by core-top AMS 14C dating19, is constrained by a lead isotope (210Pb) down-core profile (Extended Data Figs. 2-4, Extended Data Table 2). Core PS75/160, which spans the time period from ~9.2 to 1.2 kyr BP (Fig. 2a), was retrieved from a local depression in PIB at a water depth of just 337 m. The relatively shallow location of this core explains the abundant occurrence of calcareous microfossils, but another consequence is that the lowermost part of the core, older than ~8.2 kyr BP, is affected by iceberg or ice-shelf keel ploughing19 (Fig. 2). We overcome this issue by splicing the δ13C data from core PS75/160 with those from nearby core PS75/167, which span 10.4 to 8.2 kyr BP (Fig. 2b; Extended Data Fig. 1). Core PS75/167 does not contain calcareous microfossils in sediments younger than ~8.2 kyr BP. In the following we refer to the spliced record as the “PIB record”.
The benthic Mg/Ca ratios in core PS75/160 imply higher bottom-water temperatures before 7.5 kyr BP, indicating that warm CDW flooded PIB during the early Holocene (11.7-7.5 kyr BP) and that this inflow was reduced during the middle (7.5-4.0 kyr BP) to late Holocene (4.0-0 kyr BP) (Fig. 3c; Extended Data Fig. 6). Intensified early Holocene CDW inflow is corroborated by both the benthic and the planktic foraminiferal δ13C ratios of the PIB record which increase from relatively low values between ~10.4 and 9.0 kyr BP to higher values that are maintained from 7.0 kyr BP until at least 1.2 kyr BP (Figs. 2, 3a,b). The benthic δ13C ratios recorded during the early Holocene match the δ13CDIC range of pure CDW. The planktic δ13C ratios during this time interval reflect the lower range of δ13CDIC values typical for modern Antarctic Surface Water (AASW)32 which in the ASE usually forms a 200-300 m thick surface layer7,10. This observation suggests that the reduced δ13C ratios of N. pachyderma sin., which calcifies within this AASW layer28, are caused by effective admixture of unmodified CDW into AASW.
Reduced 12C export to the seabed in PIB caused by a decrease in plankton productivity can be ruled out as the reason for the benthic foraminifer δ13C shift towards higher values at the end of the early Holocene because this would have resulted in lower planktic foraminifer δ13C values, i.e. opposite to what is observed. In addition, the Ba/Ti ratios and foraminifer concentrations in core PS75/160 indicate that biological production probably increased rather than decreased after ~7.5 kyr BP (Fig. 2, Extended Data Figs. 5, 7). An onset or intensification of air-sea gas exchange between the atmosphere and surface waters in PIB at 7.5 kyr BP might have resulted from a reduction in ice-shelf coverage. The ice-shelf break-up would be consistent with the productivity increase after 7.5 kyr BP because phytoplankton production on the Antarctic continental margin is mainly controlled by the availability of light29. Such a scenario is in agreement with several early Holocene benthic δ13C values in the PIB record that are even lower than the δ13C value of pure CDW as well as a few planktic δ13C values that are lower than the δ13C value of AASW (Figs. 2, 3a,b). This observed 13C-depletion could be explained by advection of nearly pure CDW combined with reduced air-sea carbon exchange caused by ice-shelf cover of PIB during the early Holocene30,31.
The stable oxygen isotope (δ18O) data obtained from the benthic and planktic foraminifer shells in the PIB record do not reveal an early to middle Holocene shift such as the δ13C data (Extended Data Fig. 5). The δ18O composition of water masses on the Antarctic continental shelf is not simply a function of temperature but strongly influenced by salinity. As a result of meteoric and glacial meltwater supply along the coast cold surface water masses have low δ18O values relative to deep water masses32, with CDW not only being warmer but also much saltier than AASW7,10. Enhanced CDW advection to the ice margin in PIB during the early Holocene would have caused strong melting under ice shelves and at the grounding line, so that the resulting input of glacial meltwaters with low δ18O values may have suppressed the archiving of a high δ18O signal characteristic for CDW in the foraminiferal carbonate.
Benthic foraminifera and environment
The benthic foraminifer assemblages in core PS75/160 show a distinct change at ~7.5 kyr BP, when an assemblage dominated by Nonionella bradii and Globocassidulina species (G. subglobosa, G. biora) is replaced by an assemblage dominated by various Angulogerina species, especially A. angulosa (Methods), and when both total foraminifer concentration and arenaceous benthic foraminifer abundance increase (Fig. 2a, Extended Data Fig. 7). While both Globocassidulina species and Angulogerina species have been found in modern33,34 and Holocene35–38 sub-ice shelf settings, an assemblage dominated by Angulogerina observed on the eastern Antarctic Peninsula shelf has been attributed to an ice-shelf edge setting33. Also Nonionella spp. has been reported from modern33,34 and Holocene35,38 sub-ice shelf sediments but its dominance in benthic foraminifer assemblages is frequently related to high biological productivity39. Given that neither the benthic δ13C values nor the Ba/Ti ratios indicate higher productivity during the early Holocene (Figs. 2, 3a), we interpret the Globocassidulina and Nonionella dominated assemblage to indicate ice-shelf presence. Our interpretation is consistent with the dominance of Nonionella species and Globocassidulina species in benthic foraminifer assemblages of early to late Holocene sediments from the part of the eastern Antarctic Peninsula shelf which had been permanently ice-shelf covered from 11.5 kyr BP until A.D. 2002 (refs. 35, 40).
We suggest that PIB remained covered by an extensive ice shelf from at least ~9.2 until ~7.5 kyr BP. This conclusion agrees with the high proportion of a distinct non-encrusted shell morphotype of N. pachyderma sin. in the early Holocene sediments of core PS75/160 (Fig. 2a), which is indicative of specimens of a ‘neanic’ (i.e. adolescent) to adult life stage41 (Extended Data Fig. 8e-g). In contrast, the middle and late Holocene sediments in core PS75/160 are dominated by an encrusted shell morphotype that is typical for a terminal life stage41 (Extended Data Fig. 8a-d). We explain the dominance of the adolescent and adult shells by foraminifer reproduction in seasonal open water offshore from the ice shelf covering PIB, the subsequent advection of these foraminifera under the ice shelf by ocean currents, and their demise in this inhospitable environment for zooplankton, i.e. before they could reach the terminal life stage. A contributing factor for the observed down-core change in the abundance of the two morphotypes of N. pachyderma sin. may be a deepening of the pycnocline. Under ice shelves the pycnocline lies deeper than in open water7,10 and is overlain by a cool mixed layer, in which non-encrusted morphotypes are concentrated41. Given the modern water depth of 337 m at site PS75/160 and taking into account the 30-10 m lower global sea level42 and the predicted ~50 m of seafloor depression in response to glacial loading of the PIB hinterland between 10 and 7.5 kyr BP43, the thickness of this early Holocene ice shelf cannot have exceeded ~410-430 m, which is comparable to the modern thicknesses of Thwaites Glacier Ice Shelf, Ronne Ice Shelf (West Antarctica) and Amery Ice Shelf (East Antarctica) near their calving fronts8,44.
Ice-shelf cover of PIB during the early Holocene would have contributed to the low benthic and planktic δ13C values recorded during that time. However, bottom-water temperatures under ice shelves are lower than in seasonal open-marine settings10,44, whereas the benthic Mg/Ca data from PIB imply that these temperatures were higher in the proposed early Holocene sub-ice shelf environment than in the middle to late Holocene open-marine setting. Consequently, enhanced CDW supply onto the ASE shelf must have been the dominant factor influencing the early Holocene δ13C record from PIB, even if ice-shelf cover contributed to low benthic δ13C values. The most plausible scenario for explaining the changes in the foraminiferal carbon isotope composition and the bottom-water temperature around ~7.5 kyr BP is the reduction of CDW inflow. We conclude that compared to the present-day CDW advection onto the ASE shelf, which can be evaluated from the modern benthic and planktic δ13C ratios, CDW inflow was stronger from 10.4 to about 8.0 kyr BP, while it was weaker from 7.5 to 1.2 kyr BP (Figs. 2, 3a,b).
Drivers of ice-sheet change
The early Holocene intensification of CDW heat supply can be attributed to a southerly position of the SHWW belt between 12.0 and 8.0 kyr BP45 (Fig. 3g,h). The northward shift of the westerlies from 8.0 to 6.0 kyr BP45 is likely to have reduced CDW inflow as documented in the PIB record (Fig. 3). Thus, our findings expand on the conclusion from modern observational and modelling studies that the SHWW exert a major control on CDW advection onto the ASE shelf7,10,11,14. The role of buoyancy forcing9, however, remains unclear from our data. Early Holocene CDW advection may have been intensified along the entire Pacific margin of West Antarctica and thus may also explain the higher sea-surface temperatures observed on the western Antarctic Peninsula shelf during that time39,46 (Fig. 3e).
Grounded ice in PIB had retreated to within 110 km of its modern grounding line by 11.2 kyr BP19,21. Our conclusion of intensified CDW upwelling onto the ASE shelf from 10.4 to 7.5 kyr BP and probably since 12.0 kyr BP, when the SHWW already had a southerly position45, suggests that, in accordance with results from ice-sheet modeling15–17, ocean thermal forcing was the main driver of post-LGM WAIS retreat. In contrast, air temperatures in West Antarctica were still relatively low13 and post-glacial eustatic sea level had risen by not more than ~60 metres above its LGM low stand of -120 metres42,47 when PIB was already free of grounded ice, indicating that atmospheric and sea-level forcing played only a subordinate role for post-LGM WAIS deglaciation (Fig. 3d,f). Sustained high CDW heat supply and accompanying oceanic melting might have destabilised any extensive ice shelf remaining in PIB until 7.5 kyr BP so that afterwards minor atmospheric warming in West Antarctica combined with continued global sea-level rise were sufficient to trigger its disintegration (Fig. 3d-f).
The modern benthic and planktic δ13C ratios indicate that CDW inflow onto the ASE shelf must have increased at some time within the last millennium (Fig. 3a,b). The planktic δ13C down-core record available from site PS69/251 on the outer ASE shelf, dating back to A.D. 1888±37 according to its 210Pb chronology, reveals that this intensification took place between A.D. 1947±9 and A.D. 1963±9 (Fig. 4a). The increased CDW advection can be attributed to a strengthening and/or poleward shift of the SHWW, which is evident from proxy data in West Antarctic ice cores48,49 (Fig. 4b,c). Our finding is also consistent with recently published data from sub-ice shelf sediments showing that Pine Island Glacier started to retreat from a prominent sea-floor ridge in the mid-1940s, shortly after the a very large El Ninõ event from A.D. 1939 to 1942 (ref. 50). Together, these observations confirm the hypothesis that sea-surface temperature warming in the central tropical Pacific Ocean during the 1940s initiated the current period of CDW inflow onto the ASE shelf and the resulting mass loss in this sector of the WAIS12.
Importance
Our study extends the observational record of CDW inflow onto the ASE shelf further back in time through a period of significant ice-sheet change and it suggests early Holocene ice-shelf coverage in PIB. Most significantly, it provides the first empirical evidence for the dominant role of ocean forcing in driving past and recent WAIS deglaciation and the suggested control of CDW upwelling onto the ASE shelf by the SHWW. This information is crucial for validating assumptions in numerical models6,17,18 and will help to make model-based predictions of future global sea-level rise from Antarctic ice-sheet melting more robust.
Online Methods
Core material
Gravity cores PS75/160 and PS75/167 and giant box core PS75/215 were recovered on RV Polarstern expedition ANT-XXVI/3 in 2010 (ref. 51), while giant box core PS69/251 was retrieved during RV Polarstern expedition ANT-XXIII/4 in 2006 (ref. 52) (Extended Data Table 1). Sedimentological and/or chronological data for these cores have been previously published in Hillenbrand et al.19, Larter et al.21 and Smith et al.53.
Core processing, sedimentological analyses and chronologies
Methodologies of core processing and sedimentological analyses were reported by Hillenbrand et al.19, Larter et al.21 and Smith et al.53. Analytical techniques for AMS 14C dating and calibrated AMS 14C ages were also previously published19,21,53 but for this study we re-calibrated all conventional AMS 14C dates from cores PS75/160 and PS75/167 (Extended Data Table 1). Because mixed calcareous (micro-)fossils, which are known to show variable 14C vital effects40, had been radiocarbon-dated from cores PS75/160 and PS75/167, we used a marine reservoir age with a relatively large error (R + ΔR = 1,100±200 years) for their calibration19. In contrast, Larter et al.21 and Smith et al.53 applied a uniform marine reservoir age with a much smaller error (R + ΔR = 1,300±70 years) to their calibration. Calibration was conducted using the CALIB 7.1 calibration programme54 using the MARINE13 (100%) calibration curve55.
All reported and calibrated AMS 14C dates for core PS75/167 increase down-core or overlap within error but no 14C dates could be obtained from above 230 cm depth (Fig. 2b; Extended Data Table 1). The 14C dates for core PS75/160 show an age reversal below ~400 cm core depth (Fig. 2a; Extended Data Table 1). A thick unit of a distinct lithofacies (facies MC: deformed, sheared pebble-sized muddy to sandy soft sediment clasts randomly orientated in muddy matrix) occurs below this depth (Fig. 2a) suggesting that this lower part of core PS75/160 was affected by post-depositional turbation of the seafloor sediments by iceberg or ice-shelf keels19. Rather than ignoring the two trace metal (i.e. Mg/Ca) data and the benthic foraminifer assemblage data obtained from samples taken below this depth, we assigned for those samples ages by linear interpolation between maximum and minimum calibrated AMS 14C dates of neighbouring age-depth fix points. This approach leaves some uncertainty in the absolute ages for the corresponding samples but an early Holocene age for the lower part of core PS75/160 is documented by the available AMS 14C dates (Fig. 2a; Extended Data Table 1). We spliced the stable carbon isotope (δ13C) records of cores PS75/160 and PS75/167 at 8.2 kyr BP (Extended Data Fig. 1) and display in panels a and b of Figure 3 exclusively δ13C data from below 230 cm depth in core PS75/167 for the time interval >8.2 kyr BP and from above 380 cm depth in core PS75/160 for the time interval <8.2 kyr BP.
Radiocarbon dating of planktic foraminifera (Neogloboquadrina pachyderma sinistral) from undisturbed seafloor surface sediment retrieved in giant box core PS69/251 provided an uncorrected AMS 14C age of 1,144±37 years19,53 and thus the youngest 14C date obtained from modern surface sediments from the continental shelf in the Amundsen and Bellingshausen seas21 (Extended Data Table 1). As calcareous microfossil material was insufficient for AMS 14C dating in samples taken from below the surface, lead-210 (210Pb) dating and caesium-137 (137Cs) dating were applied to core PS69/251 for establishing ages of down-core samples. The 210Pb and 137Cs activities were measured on 1 cm thick sediment slices by gamma-spectrometry using Canberra ultra-low-background Ge-detectors at the Gamma Dating Centre, Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, University of Copenhagen. 210Pb was measured from its gamma-peak at 46.5 keV, 226Ra from the granddaughter 214Pb (peaks at 295 and 352 keV) and 137Cs from its peak at 661 keV. The core showed surface contents of unsupported 210Pb of ~115 Bq kg-1 with a tendency for exponential decline with depth in the upper 6 cm (Extended Data Fig. 2a). Below ~6 cm core depth the 210Pb activity was at the detection limit or lower. The calculated flux of unsupported 210Pb is 100 Bq m-2 yr-1 which is in reasonable agreement with the expected flux from atmospheric deposition56. The content of 137Cs was generally very low (Extended Data Fig. 2b). Constant Rate of Supply (CRS) modelling was applied on the 210Pb profile using a modified method56 where the activity below 6 cm depth was calculated on the basis of a regression (Extended Data Fig. 3). The 210Pb dating results are given in Extended Data Table 2 and Extended Data Figure 4.
X-ray fluorescence scanning
Semi-quantitative uncalibrated major and trace element composition of cores PS75/160 and PS75/167 were analysed at the Alfred Wegener Institute, Bremerhaven, using an Avaatech XRF core scanner57. We applied XRF core scanning predominantly for the determination of the barium/titanium (Ba/Ti) peak-area ratio (hereafter referred to as the Ba/Ti ratio), which is a proxy for biogenic barium (Babio). Babio is considered to be the most reliable palaeoproductivity proxy in Antarctic continental margin sediments and Southern Ocean sediments south of the Antarctic Polar Front29,58–60. Following Weltje and Tjallingi61 we plotted the log-normalised [LN(Ba/Ti)] peak-area ratios in Figures 2 and Extended Data Figure 5. In order to assess down-core changes in the input of barium that is incorporated in the terrigenous heavy mineral barite we also calculated the log-normalised barium/zirconium (Ba/Zr) peak-area ratios [LN(Ba/Zr)], with Zr being a proxy for the terrigenous heavy mineral zircon (Extended Data Fig. 5).
Stable carbon and oxygen isotope analyses
Stable carbon (δ13C) and oxygen (δ18O) isotope analyses were performed on the planktic foraminifer species Neogloboquadrina pachyderma sinistral (12-24 shells; morphotype 1) and the epibenthic to shallow infaunal foraminifer Angulogerina angulosa (= Trifarina angulosa) (5-20 shells) (Extended Data Figs. 5, 7). The δ13C and δ18O isotopes were measured on 104 planktic and 112 benthic foraminifer samples from cores PS75/160 and PS75/167, one benthic foraminifer sample from site PS75/215 and seven planktic foraminifer samples from core PS69/251. The shells were picked from the wet sieved 63-2000 μm sediment size fraction and analysed at the Godwin Laboratory for Palaeoclimate Research at the Department of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge (UK). Foraminifer shells were first crushed and soaked in a solution of 3 % H2O2 for 30 minutes, then acetone was added and the sample ultrasonicated for 10 seconds before the liquid was decanted. Samples were then dried at 50 °C overnight. Vials were sealed with septa and screw caps and analysed using a Micromass Multicarb sample preparation system attached to a VG SIRA Mass Spectrometer. Each run of 30 samples was accompanied by ten reference carbonates and two control samples. Results are reported with reference to the international standard Vienna Pee Dee Belemnite (VPDB), and analytical precision is better than ±0.06 ‰ for δ13C and ±0.08 ‰ for δ18O. In this study, we only used the δ13C data of A. angulosa and N. pachyderma sin. The δ13C data of A. angulosa and N. pachyderma sin. were corrected for vital effects by adding +0.85 ‰ (cf. ref. 23) and +1.0 ‰ (refs. 27, 28), respectively.
Trace metal analyses
Ten samples from core PS75/160 contained sufficient calcareous benthic foraminifer shells of A. angulosa (200-300 μg) and ten samples from this core contained sufficient planktic foraminifer shells of N. pachyderma sin. (300-500 μg) for trace metal analyses. Samples were only taken from horizons with a lithofacies that does not indicate signs of reworking (i.e. no samples were taken from facies MC; Fig. 2a).
Cleaning of the shells followed the procedure described in Barker et al.62. Element ratios were determined by ICP-OES63 and ICP-MS64. Long-term instrumental precision of element ratio data, determined by replicate analyses of a standard solution containing magnesium/calcium (Mg/Ca) = 1.3 mmol mol-1, was ±0.46 % r.s.d. Accuracy of Mg/Ca determinations was confirmed by inter-laboratory studies of foraminifer and carbonate reference materials65,66.
Iron/calcium (Fe/Ca) and manganese/calcium (Mn/Ca) were measured to monitor cleaning efficiency and diagenetic effects. The N. pachyderma sin. samples contained high Fe/Ca and Mn/Ca (up to 0.40 and 2.48 mmol mol-1, respectively) with strong positive correlation between Mg/Ca, Fe/Ca (r2 = 0.93) and Mn/Ca (r2 = 0.94), reflecting diagenetic coating of the shells67 not removed by the cleaning procedure. Therefore, the Mg/Ca data on N. pachyderma sin. were not interpreted. The A. angulosa samples contained much lower Fe/Ca and Mn/Ca (maximum 0.14 and 0.64 mmol mol-1, respectively) with no correlation observed between Mg/Ca and Fe/Ca (r2 = 0.02) and a smaller (but still significant) correlation between Mg/Ca and Mn/Ca (r2 = 0.56). In order to evaluate the impact of any diagenetic Mg contribution on the Mg/Ca data, we applied a correction to the measured Mg/Ca of A. angulosa (Fig. 3c, Extended Data Fig. 6a), assuming Mg/Mn of a diagenetic coating is 0.15±0.05 mol mol-1, reflecting average composition of Mn nodules and ferromanganese crusts68,69, especially of those from the South Pacific and Pacific sector of the Southern Ocean70–72. The adjusted Mg/Ca ratios show the same (although less pronounced) down-core trend as the non-adjusted Mg/Ca data, with higher Mg/Ca ratios found before 7.5 kyr BP (Extended Data Fig. 6a,b). Also use of other Mg/Mn ratios for diagenetic coatings69 still indicates that the early to middle Holocene decrease in our Mg/Ca data is a robust feature (Extended Data Fig. 6b).
Boron/Calcium (B/Ca) was analysed on all. A. angulosa and N. pachyderma sin. samples aiming to exclude an influence of alkalinity on the Mg/Ca records73,74. Neither the benthic nor the planktic foraminiferal data show a correlation between Mg/Ca and B/Ca. However, B/Ca values measured on the A. angulosa shells were very low, in the range 7.1 to 13.0 µmol mol-1, and probably influenced by the laboratory blanks. Consequently, the B/Ca data were not interpreted.
The Mg/Ca composition of calcareous foraminifer shells is frequently used as a quantitative proxy for seawater temperature20,75 but can also be controlled by the carbonate ion concentration ([CO32-]) in the ambient seawater73,76. Consequently, higher Mg/Ca ratios as observed in core PS75/160 during the early Holocene (Fig. 3c, Extended Data Fig. 6) indicate an increase in either the temperatures and/or the [CO32-] of the deep-water mass flooding Pine Island Bay (PIB) during that time. The influence of the latter can be evaluated by measuring the B/Ca ratio of the foraminifer shells73,76,77, which, however, provided only inconclusive results for our samples from core PS75/160 (see above). The pre-industrial [CO32-] in Antarctic Surface Water (AASW) was 120 μmol kg-1 (ref. 28), whereas Circumpolar Deep Water (CDW) is characterised by a uniform, relatively low [CO32-] of 84±5 μmol kg-1 throughout the Southern Ocean, including its Pacific sector and the region south of the Antarctic Polar Front78. If the elevated benthic foraminiferal Mg/Ca ratios in PIB recorded during the early Holocene were caused by the presence of an AASW-like water mass that comprised the entire water column, the corresponding benthic foraminiferal δ13C ratios can be expected to resemble δ13CDIC values typical for AASW. In contrast, our early Holocene benthic foraminiferal δ13C data from cores PS75/160 and PS75/167 are lower and typical for CDW (Figs. 2, 3b, Extended Data Fig. 5) and thus not consistent with a scenario that deep water present on the shelf of the Amundsen Sea Embayment (ASE) during that time was derived from AASW with the benthic Mg/Ca data reflecting its higher [CO32-].
Deep-water warming on the ASE shelf could have resulted either from intensified CDW upwelling or CDW warming. CDW warming would have resulted from a higher influx of North Atlantic Deep Water (NADW), which is the source water mass for CDW, into the Southern Ocean. NADW is injected into the clockwise flowing Antarctic Circumpolar Current in the Atlantic sector of the Southern Ocean, mixes with recirculated deep waters from the Indian and Pacific oceans, and, most importantly, acts as the “heat source” for CDW79. The [CO32-] of NADW is ~125 μmol kg-1 compared to only 84±5 μmol kg-1 in CDW78. Thus, intensified NADW influx into the Southern Ocean during the early Holocene, which is supported by marine sedimentary records from the Atlantic sector80, would have raised both the temperature and the [CO32-] in deep water flooding the ASE shelf, consistent with our Mg/Ca data from PIB. The δ13CDIC of NADW is higher than in CDW81. Consequently, increased NADW supply would have raised the δ13CDIC of CDW. This, however, is in conflict with the early Holocene benthic foraminiferal δ13C data from our PIB cores, which are characterised by low values typical for CDW (Figs. 2, 3b; Extended Data Fig. 5). Therefore, the elevated benthic foraminiferal Mg/Ca ratios recorded in PIB during the early Holocene must reflect deep water warming caused by intensified CDW upwelling.
Analyses of benthic foraminifer assemblages
A total of 38 samples (1 cm thick sediment slices) were taken from core PS75/160 for benthic foraminifer analysis82. As with the trace metal samples, no samples were taken from the core section with lithofacies MC between 405 and 485 cm depth. The samples were washed through a 63 μm mesh-size sieve before the coarse residue was dry-sieved over 2 mm. All samples were screened in order to estimate the abundance of foraminifera. 27 samples with a relatively high content of foraminifera were selected for microscopic analysis and then dry-sieved over 125 μm and 250 μm. 23 of the 27 samples contained >300 benthic foraminifer shells in the >125 μm fraction. Samples with significantly more than 300 specimens and/or a large sample volume were split using a traditional hand-splitter until a suitable aliquot remained. Picked foraminifera were then identified under an optical microscope and by using Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) images. Classification and identification were carried out in accordance with literature on recent Antarctic foraminifera (for full reference list, see Poole82).
Throughout core PS75/160, abundances of foraminifera are high, with total numbers ranging from 81 to 1,511 specimens per sample, and over 14,000 total specimens were identified from all samples82. The 27 samples yielded 84 benthic taxa but only one planktic species (N. pachyderma sin.). Between 0 and 341.5 cm core depth the abundance of foraminifera per gram of dry sediment (foraminifera g-1) is substantially greater than from 352.5 to 653.5 cm core depth, and there is a large range throughout the core (maximum: 306.19 foraminifera g-1 at 281.5 cm; minimum: 1.85 foraminifera g-1 at 631.5 cm) (Extended Data Fig. 7). Between 0 and 341.5 cm core depth, the average concentration of 102.58 foraminifera g-1 far exceeds the average concentration of only 20.81 foraminifera g-1 between 352.5 and 653.5 cm core depth.
Benthic calcareous species dominate the assemblages throughout the core while the abundance of arenaceous species accounts for a maximum of 30 % (depth: 141 cm) (Extended Data Fig. 7). Over two-thirds of samples comprise more than 85 % calcareous foraminifera82. However, arenaceous foraminifera are more abundant between 0 and 341.5 cm (mean: 15.2 %) than between 352.5 and 653.5 cm (mean: 7.0 %). N. pachyderma sin. is not particularly abundant, contributing a maximum of 5.5 % to the total assemblage at 281.5 cm, though it is present in all samples. Preservation of benthic and planktic foraminifer shells was good to moderate throughout the core.
The upper section of core PS75/160 from 0 to 341.5 cm depth typically contains high abundances and percentages of the calcareous benthic species Angulogerina angulosa, A. sp. 1, Uvigerina sp. 1, Globocassidulina subglobosa, and G. biora (Extended Data Fig. 7). Relatively abundant accessory species include Astrononion echolsi, Alabaminella weddellensis and the arenaceous species Miliammina arenacea, Portatrochammina sp. 1 and Labrospira jeffreysii. We follow previous researchers on benthic foraminifera from the Antarctic continental margin and summarize under ‘A. angulosa’ the species A. angulosa, A. earlandi, Trifarina angulosa and T. earlandi36,83–85, which are morphospecies rather than separate biological species (cf. refs. 86–88). Moreover, molecular genetic data have shown that Angulogerina/Trifarina is closely related to Uvigerina peregrina88,89, with which it also shares the epifaunal to shallow infaunal habitat23,83,90.
A major faunal change was observed between 341.5 and 352.5 cm core depth. The section below this depth is characterised by low abundances of A. angulosa and A. pauperata. This lower core section is dominated by Nonionella bradii, N. iridea, G. subglobosa, and G. biora (Extended Data Fig. 7). The subsidiary species include Ehrenbergina glabra, Fursenkoina fusiformis (calcareous), and Portatrochammina sp. 1 (arenaceous). The planktic foraminifera in this lower core section are dominated by N. pachyderma sin. type 2, while N. pachyderma sin. type 1 dominates the upper section (Extended Data Figs. 7, 8). Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Correspondence Analysis (CA) and Cluster Analysis demonstrate that the pronounced change between the two dominant benthic foraminifer assemblages between 341.5 and 352.5 cm core depth is statistically robust82.
Data availability statement
The stable isotope (δ13C, δ18O), trace metal (Mg/Ca, Mn/Ca), XRF scanner (Ba/Ti, Ba/Zr), benthic foraminifer assemblage and chronological (AMS 14C, 210Pb) data reported in this paper are available in the PANGAEA database under doi:10.1594/PANGAEA.XXX [number to be assigned after final acceptance] and from the corresponding author by request. Metadata, detailed core descriptions, X-radiographs, physical properties and grain size data of the cores are available under doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.751493.
Extended Data
Extended Data Table 1. Locations, conventional and calibrated AMS 14C dates on calcareous microfossils from the investigated sediment cores.
Station and core ID | Latitude (°S) | Longitude (°W) | Water depth (m) | Recovery (m) | Sample depth (cmbsf) | Laboratory code | Dated material | 14C age ±1 s.d. (yr BP) | Max. age (yr BP) | Min. age (yr BP) | Med. age (yr BP) | Mean age (yr BP) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PS2544-1 GBC | 71.796 | 105.191 | 546 | 0.21 | surface | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
PS69/251-1 GBC | 72.069 | 104.483 | 573 | 0.38 | surface | SUERC-18942 | pF | 1144±37 | N/A | N/A | [0] | [0] |
PS75/215-1 GBC | 74.592 | 104.042 | 556 | 0.62 | surface | Beta-315966 | Bz | 1190±30 | N/A | N/A | [0] | [0] |
PS75/1 60-1 GC | 74.564 | 102.624 | 337 | 6.68 | 0.5 | Beta-284601 | bF, S, O | 2340±40 | 1615 | 756 | 1190 | 1186 |
133.5 | Beta-284602 | S | 2750±40 | 2118 | 1212 | 1634 | 1665 | |||||
230 | Beta-284604 | bF, S, O | 4990±40 | 4919 | 3840 | 4405 | 4380 | |||||
300 | Beta-284681 | bF, S | 7180±40 | 7400 | 6514 | 6967 | 6957 | |||||
380 | Beta-284606 | bF, S | 8410±40 | 8592 | 7735 | 8137 | 8164 | |||||
490+500 | Beta-284607 | bF, P, S, O | 9320±40 | 9729 | 8650 | 9243 | 9190 | |||||
588+600 | Beta-284608 | bF, S, O, Bp | 8560±40 | 8861 | 7913 | 8331 | 8387 | |||||
652 | Beta-284610 | S | 8200±40 | 8358 | 7578 | 7966 | 7968 | |||||
top of CC | Beta-284600 | Bp, S, bF | 8240±40 | 8390 | 7603 | 8006 | 7997 | |||||
PS75/1 67-1 GC | 74.623 | 105.802 | 526 | 9.34 | 230 | Beta-300838 | F | 8490±40 | 8734 | 7820 | 8254 | 8277 |
250 | Beta-300839 | F, S | 8740±40 | 9040 | 8065 | 8547 | 8553 | |||||
280 | Beta-284682 | F | 9080±50 | 9432 | 8451 | 8949 | 8942 | |||||
401 | Beta-284683 | F, S, O | 9210±50 | 9541 | 8550 | 9113 | 9046 | |||||
478 | Beta-300837 | F, O, E | 9180±40 | 9516 | 8547 | 9077 | 9032 | |||||
598 | Beta-300840 | F | 9490±40 | 10070 | 8979 | 9459 | 9525 | |||||
625.5 | Beta-284684 | F | 9660±50 | 10206 | 9193 | 9690 | 9700 | |||||
649 | Beta-300841 | F | 9280±40 | 9656 | 8616 | 9196 | 9136 | |||||
670 | Beta-284685 | F | 9450±50 | 10029 | 8899 | 9405 | 9464 | |||||
746 | Beta-284686 | F, S | 9690±50 | 10228 | 9231 | 9726 | 9730 | |||||
830 | Beta-300842 | F | 9620±50 | 10169 | 9133 | 9640 | 9651 | |||||
900.5 | Beta-284687 | F, S | 10210±60 | 10934 | 9778 | 10372 | 10356 |
Extended Data Table 2. Chronology of the upper 6 cm of core PS69/251 based on constant rate of supply modelling of the unsupported lead-210 concentration.
Depth (cm) | Age (yrs) | Age error (yrs) | Date (yrs A.D.) | Mass accumulation rate (kg m-2 yr-1) | Mass accumulation rate error (kg m-2 yr-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 2006 | ||||
0-1 | 6 | 3 | 2000 | 0.78 | 0.10 |
1-2 | 21 | 4 | 1985 | 0.57 | 0.10 |
2-3 | 40 | 6 | 1966 | 0.41 | 0.10 |
3-4 | 59 | 9 | 1947 | 0.42 | 0.16 |
4-5 | 81 | 15 | 1925 | 0.38 | 0.19 |
5-6 | 118 | 37 | 1888 | 0.24 | 0.28 |
Acknowledgements
This study is part of the Polar Science for Planet Earth Programme of the British Antarctic Survey and the PACES II (Polar Regions and Coasts in the changing Earth System) programme of the Alfred-Wegener-Institut. It was funded by the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC), NERC grant NE/M013081/1 and the Helmholtz Association. This work was also funded (in part) by The European Research Council (ERC grant 2010-NEWLOG ADG-267931 HE). We thank the captain, crew, shipboard scientists and support staff participating in RV Polarstern expeditions ANT-XXIII/4 and ANT-XXVI/3, and are grateful to R. Downey, T. Williams, V. Peck, H. Blagbrough, R. Fröhlking and S. Wiebe for their assistance. Furthermore, we thank D. Hodgson, D. Vaughan and P. Dutrieux for discussions, S. Schmidtko for providing data and three anonymous referees for their thoughtful comments which helped to improve the paper.
Footnotes
Author contributions C.-D.H. conceived the idea for the study and together with J.A.S., G.K. and R.D.L. wrote the manuscript. G.K., C.-D.H. and K.G. collected the PS69 sediment core and together with J.A.S., P.E.J. and J.P.K. the PS75 cores. C.-D.H., J.A.S. and S.J.R. developed the 14C age models for the PS75 cores. R.D.L. designed Figure 1. T.J.A. conducted the 210Pb measurements on the PS69 core and provided its age model. G.K., C.-D.H., J.A.S., J.P.K. and P.E.J. undertook the sedimentological analyses. D.H. measured stable isotopes on the foraminifer shells, while M.G. and H.E. analysed the trace metals. C.R.P., S.K. and M.W. analysed the foraminifer assemblages. All co-authors commented on the manuscript and provided input to its final version.
Author information Reprints and permissions information is available at www.nature.com/reprints. Readers are welcome to comment on the online version of the paper.
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
References
- 1.Sutterley TC, et al. Mass loss of the Amundsen Sea Embayment of West Antarctica from four independent techniques. Geophys Res Lett. 2014;41:8421–8428. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Mouginot J, Rignot E, Scheuch B. Sustained increase in ice discharge from the Amundsen Sea Embayment, West Antarctica, from 1973 to 2013. Geophys Res Lett. 2014;41:1576–1584. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Rignot E, Mouginot J, Morlighem M, Seroussi H, Scheuch B. Widespread, rapid grounding line retreat of Pine Island, Thwaites, Smith, and Kohler glaciers, West Antarctica, from 1992 to 2011. Geophys Res Lett. 2014;41:3502–3509. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Joughin I, Smith B, Medley B. Marine ice sheet collapse potentially under way for the Thwaites Glacier basin, West Antarctica. Science. 2014;344:735–738. doi: 10.1126/science.1249055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Favier L, et al. Retreat of Pine Island Glacier controlled by marine ice-sheet instability. Nature Climate Change. 2014;4:117–121. [Google Scholar]
- 6.DeConto RM, Pollard D. Contribution of Antarctica to past and future sea-level rise. Nature. 2016;531:591–597. doi: 10.1038/nature17145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Jacobs SS, Jenkins A, Giulivi CF, Dutrieux P. Stronger ocean circulation and increased melting under Pine Island Glacier ice shelf. Nature Geosci. 2011;4:519–523. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Paolo FS, Fricker HA, Padman L. Volume loss from Antarctic ice shelves is accelerating. Science. 2015;348:327–331. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa0940. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wåhlin AK, et al. Variability of Warm Deep Water inflow in a submarine trough on the Amundsen Sea shelf. J Phys Oceanography. 2013;43:2054–2070. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Dutrieux P, et al. Strong sensitivity of Pine Island Ice-Shelf melting to climatic variability. Science. 2014;343:174–178. doi: 10.1126/science.1244341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Thoma M, Jenkins A, Holland D, Jacobs S. Modelling Circumpolar Deep Water intrusions on the Amundsen Sea continental shelf, Antarctica. Geophys Res Lett. 2008;35:L18602. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Steig EJ, Ding Q, Battisti DS, Jenkins A. Tropical forcing of Circumpolar Deep Water inflow and outlet glacier thinning in the Amundsen Sea Embayment, West Antarctica. Annals Glaciol. 2012;53:19–28. [Google Scholar]
- 13.WAIS Divide Project Members. Onset of deglacial warming in West Antarctica driven by local orbital forcing. Nature. 2013;500:440–444. doi: 10.1038/nature12376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Schmidtko S, Heywood KJ, Thompson AF, Aoki S. Multidecadal warming of Antarctic waters. Science. 2014;346:1227–1231. doi: 10.1126/science.1256117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Pollard D, DeConto RM. Modelling West Antarctic ice sheet growth and collapse through the past five million years. Nature. 2009;458:329–333. doi: 10.1038/nature07809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Golledge NR, et al. Antarctic contribution to meltwater pulse 1A from reduced Southern Ocean overturning. Nature Communications. 2014;5:5107. doi: 10.1038/ncomms6107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Pollard D, Chang W, Haran M, Applegate P, DeConto R. Large ensemble modeling of the last deglacial retreat of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet: comparison of simple and advanced statistical techniques. Geosci Model Dev. 2016;9:1697–1723. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Golledge NR, et al. The multi-millennial Antarctic commitment to future sea-level rise. Nature. 2015;526:421–425. doi: 10.1038/nature15706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Hillenbrand C-D, et al. Grounding-line retreat of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet from inner Pine Island Bay. Geology. 2013;41:35–38. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Katz ME, et al. Traditional and emerging geochemical proxies in foraminifera. J Foram Res. 2010;40:165–192. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Larter RD, et al. Reconstruction of changes in the Amundsen Sea and Bellingshausen Sea sector of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet since the Last Glacial Maximum. Quat Sci Rev. 2014;100:55–86. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Broecker WS, Peng TH. Tracers in the Sea. Lamont Doherty Geol. Obs. Publ., Columbia University; New York: 1982. p. 689. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Mackensen A, Licari L. Carbon isotopes of live benthic foraminifera from the eastern South Atlantic Ocean: sensitivity to bottom water carbonate saturation state and organic matter rain rates. In: Wefer G, Mulitza S, Ratmeyer V, editors. The South Atlantic in the Late Quaternary – Reconstruction of Material Budget and Current Systems. Springer; Berlin-Heidelberg: 2004. pp. 623–644. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Mackensen A. Strong thermodynamic imprint on recent bottom-water and epibenthic δ13C in the Weddell Sea revealed: Implications for glacial Southern Ocean ventilation. Earth Planet Sci Lett. 2012;317–318:20–26. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Mackensen A, Rudolph M, Kuhn G. Late Pleistocene deep-water circulation in the subantarctic eastern Atlantic. Global Planet Change. 2001;30:197–229. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Hodell DA, Venz KA, Charles CD, Ninnemann US. Pleistocene vertical carbon isotope and carbonate gradients in the South Atlantic sector of the Southern Ocean. Geochem Geophys Geosyst. 2003;4:1004. doi: 10.1029/2002GC000367. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Charles CD, Fairbanks RA. Glacial to interglacial changes in the isotopic gradients of Southern Ocean surface water. In: Bleil U, Thiede J, editors. The geological history of the polar oceans: Arctic versus Antarctic. Kluwer Academic; Norwell MA: 1990. pp. 519–538. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kohfeld KE, Anderson RF, Lynch-Stieglitz J. Carbon isotopic disequilibrium in polar planktonic foraminifera and its impact on modern and Last Glacial Maximum reconstructions. Paleoceanography. 2000;15:53–64. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Bonn W, Gingele FX, Grobe H, Mackensen A, Fütterer DK. Palaeoproductivity at the Antarctic continental margin: opal and barium records for the last 400 ka. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol. 1998;139:195–211. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kirshner AE, et al. Post-LGM deglaciation in Pine Island Bay, West Antarctica. Quat Sci Rev. 2012;38:11–26. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Johnson JS, et al. Rapid thinning of Pine Island Glacier in the Early Holocene. Science. 2014;343:999–1001. doi: 10.1126/science.1247385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Mackensen A. Oxygen and carbon stable isotope tracers of Weddell Sea water masses: new data and some paleoceanographic implications. Deep-Sea Res I. 2001;48:1401–1422. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Ishman SE, Szymcek P. Foraminiferal distributions in the former Larsen-A Ice Shelf and Prince Gustav Channel region, eastern Antarctic Peninsula margin: A baseline for Holocene paleoenvironmental change. Antarctic Res Ser. 2003;79:239–260. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Barrett PJ, et al. Oceanography and sedimentation beneath the McMurdo Ice Shelf in Windless Bight, Antarctica. Antarctic Data Series. 2007;25:95. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Ishman SE, et al. Stable isotopic and foraminiferal evidence of Larsen-B Ice Shelf stability throughout the Holocene. In: Cooper AK, Raymond CR, et al., editors. USGS Open-File Rep; Online Proceedings of the 10th ISAES X; 2007. p. 4. Ext. Abstr. 018. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Pudsey CJ, Murray JW, Appleby P, Evans J. Ice shelf history from petrographic and foraminiferal evidence, Northeast Antarctic Peninsula. Quat Sci Rev. 2006;25:2357–2379. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Melis R, Salvi G. Late Quaternary foraminiferal assemblages from western Ross Sea (Antarctica) in relation to the main glacial and marine lithofacies. Marine Micropal. 2009;70:39–53. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Kilfeather AA, et al. Ice-stream retreat and ice-shelf history in Marguerite Trough, Antarctic Peninsula: Sedimentological and foraminiferal signatures. Geol Soc Am Bull. 2011;123:997–1015. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Peck VL, Allen CS, Kender S, McClymont EL, Hodgson DA. Oceanographic variability on the West Antarctic Peninsula during the Holocene and the influence of upper circumpolar deep water. Quat Sci Rev. 2015;119:54–65. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Domack E, et al. Stability of the Larsen B ice shelf on the Antarctic Peninsula during the Holocene epoch. Nature. 2005;436:681–685. doi: 10.1038/nature03908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Berberich D. Die planktische Foraminifere Neogloboquadrina pachyderma (Ehrenberg) im Weddellmeer, Antarktis. Repts Polar Res. 1996;195:193. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Blanchon P, Eisenhauer A, Fietzke J, Liebetrau V. Rapid sea-level rise and reef back-stepping at the close of the last interglacial highstand. Nature. 2009;458:881–884. doi: 10.1038/nature07933. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Whitehouse PL, Bentley MJ, Milne GA, King MA, Thomas ID. A new glacial isostatic adjustment model for Antarctica: calibrated and tested using observations of relative sea-level change and present-day uplift rates. Geophys J Int. 2012;190:1464–1482. [Google Scholar]
- 44.Nicholls KW, Makinson K, Østerhus S. Circulation and water masses beneath the northern Ronne Ice Shelf, Antarctica. J Geophys Res. 2004;109:C12017. [Google Scholar]
- 45.McGlone MS, Turney CSM, Wilmshurst JM, Renwick J, Pahnke K. Divergent trends in land and ocean temperature in the Southern Ocean over the past 18,000 years. Nature Geosci. 2010;3:622–626. [Google Scholar]
- 46.Shevenell AE, Ingalls AE, Domack EW, Kelly C. Holocene Southern Ocean surface temperature variability west of the Antarctic Peninsula. Nature. 2011;470:250–254. doi: 10.1038/nature09751. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Toscano MA, Peltier WR, Drummond R. ICE-5G and ICE-6G models of postglacial relative sea-level history applied to the Holocene coral reef record of northeastern St Croix, U.S.V.I.: Investigating the influence of rotational feedback on GIA processes at tropical latitudes. Quat Sci Rev. 2011;30:3032–3042. [Google Scholar]
- 48.Koffman BG, et al. Centennial-scale variability of the Southern Hemisphere westerly wind belt in the eastern Pacific over the past two millennia. Clim Past. 2014;10:1125–1144. [Google Scholar]
- 49.Dixon DA, et al. An ice-core proxy for northerly air mass incursions into West Antarctica. Int J Climatol. 2012;32:1455–1465. [Google Scholar]
- 50.Smith JA, et al. Sub-ice-shelf sediments record history of twentieth-century retreat of Pine Island Glacier. Nature. 2017;541:77–80. doi: 10.1038/nature20136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Gohl K, editor. The expedition of the Research Vessel “Polarstern” to the Amundsen Sea, Antarctica. 2010 (ANT-XXVI/3) Repts Polar Mar Res. 2010;617:173. [Google Scholar]
- 52.Gohl K, editor. The expedition ANT-XXIII/4 of the research vessel Polarstern in 2006. Repts Polar Mar Res. 2007;557:166. [Google Scholar]
- 53.Smith JA, et al. New constraints on the timing of West Antarctic Ice Sheet retreat in the eastern Amundsen Sea since the Last Glacial Maximum. Global Planet Change. 2014;122:224–237. [Google Scholar]
- 54.Stuiver M, Reimer PJ. Extended 14C data base and revised CALIB 3.0 14C age calibration program. Radiocarbon. 1993;35:215–230. [Google Scholar]
- 55.Reimer PJ, et al. INTCAL13 and MARINE13 radiocarbon age calibration curves 0-50,000 years cal BP. Radiocarbon. 2013;55:1869–1887. [Google Scholar]
- 56.Appleby PG. Chronostratigraphic techniques in recent sediments. In: Last WM, Smol JP, editors. Tracking environmental change using lake sediments. Volume 1: Basin analysis, coring and chronological techniques. Kluwer Academic; Dordrecht: 2001. pp. 171–203. [Google Scholar]
- 57.Richter TO, et al. The Avaatech XRF Core Scanner: technical description and applications to NE Atlantic sediments. In: Rothwell RG, editor. New Techniques in Sediment Core Analysis. Vol. 267. The Geological Society of London; London: 2006. pp. 39–50. Geol. Soc. London Special Publ. [Google Scholar]
- 58.Hillenbrand C-D, Kuhn G, Frederichs T. Record of a Mid-Pleistocene depositional anomaly in West Antarctic continental margin sediments: an indicator for ice-sheet collapse? Quat Sci Rev. 2009;28:1147–1159. [Google Scholar]
- 59.Nürnberg CC, Bohrmann G, Schlüter M. Barium accumulation in the Atlantic sector of the Southern Ocean: results from 190.000-year records. Paleoceanography. 1997;12:594–603. [Google Scholar]
- 60.Jaccard SL, et al. Two modes of change in Southern Ocean productivity over the past million years. Science. 2013;339:1419–1423. doi: 10.1126/science.1227545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Weltje GJ, Tjallingii R. Calibration of XRF core scanners for quantitative geochemical logging of sediment cores: Theory and application. Earth Planet Sci Lett. 2008;274:423–438. [Google Scholar]
- 62.Barker S, Greaves M, Elderfield H. A study of cleaning procedures used for foraminiferal Mg/Ca paleothermometry. Geochem Geophys Geosyst. 2003;4:8407. doi: 10.1029/2003GC000559. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 63.de Villiers S, Greaves MJ, Elderfield H. An intensity ratio calibration method for the accurate determination of Mg/Ca and Sr/Ca of marine carbonates by ICP-AES. Geochem Geophys Geosyst. 2002;3 doi: 10.1029/2001GC000169. GC000169. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Misra S, et al. Determination of B/Ca of natural carbonates by HR-ICP-MS. Geochem Geophys Geosyst. 2014;15:1617–1628. doi: 10.1002/2013GC005049. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Rosenthal Y, et al. Interlaboratory comparison study of Mg/Ca and Sr/Ca measurements in planktonic foraminifera for paleoceanographic research. Geochem Geophys Geosyst. 2004;5 doi: 10.1029/2003GC000650. Q04D09. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Greaves M, et al. Interlaboratory comparison study of calibration standards for foraminiferal Mg/Ca thermometry. Geochem Geophys Geosyst. 2008;9 doi: 10.1029/2008GC001974. Q08010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Pena LD, et al. Characterization of contaminant phases in foraminifera carbonates by electron microprobe mapping. Geochem Geophys Geosyst. 2008;9 doi: 10.1029/2008GC002018. Q07012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 68.de Lange GJ, Van Os BJH, Poorter R. Geochemical composition and inferred accretion rates of sediments and manganese nodules from a submarine hill in the Madeira Abyssal Plain, eastern North Atlantic. Mar Geol. 1992;109:171–194. [Google Scholar]
- 69.Hasenfratz AP, et al. Determination of the Mg/Mn ratio in foraminiferal coatings: An approach to correct Mg/Ca temperatures for Mn-rich contaminant phases. Earth Planet Sci Lett. 2017;457:335–347. [Google Scholar]
- 70.Hein JR, Koschinsky A. Deep-Ocean Ferromanganese Crusts and Nodules. In: Scott SD, editor. Treatise on Geochemistry. Vol. 13. Elsevier; Amsterdam: 2014. pp. 273–291. [Google Scholar]
- 71.Hein JR, et al. Cobalt-Rich Ferromanganese Crusts in the Pacific. In: Cronan DS, editor. Handbook of Ore Mineral Deposits. CRC Press; Boca Raton-London-New York-Washington D.C.: 1999. pp. 239–279. [Google Scholar]
- 72.Bolton BR, Exon NF, Ostwald J, Kudrass HR. Geochemistry of ferromanganese crusts and nodules from the South Tasman Rise, southeast of Australia. Mar Geol. 1988;84:53–80. [Google Scholar]
- 73.Rickaby REM, Elderfield H, Roberts N, Hillenbrand C-D, Mackensen A. Evidence for elevated alkalinity in the glacial Southern Ocean. Paleoceanography. 2010;25 doi: 10.1029/2009PA001762. PA1209. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Yu J, Foster GL, Elderfield H, Broecker WS, Clark E. An evaluation of benthic foraminiferal B/Ca and δ11B for deep ocean carbonate ion and pH reconstructions. Earth Planet Sci Lett. 2010;293:114–120. [Google Scholar]
- 75.Elderfield H, et al. Evolution of ocean temperature and ice volume through the Mid-Pleistocene Climate Transition. Science. 2012;337:704–709. doi: 10.1126/science.1221294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Yu J, Elderfield H. Mg/Ca in the benthic foraminifera Cibicidoides wuellerstorfi and Cibicidoides mundulus: Temperature versus carbonate ion saturation. Earth Planet Sci Lett. 2008;276:129–139. [Google Scholar]
- 77.Yu J, Elderfield H. Benthic foraminiferal B/Ca ratios reflect deep water carbonate saturation state. Earth Planet Sci Lett. 2007;258:73–86. [Google Scholar]
- 78.Broecker WS, Sutherland WS. Distribution of carbonate ion in the deep ocean: Support for a post-Little Ice Age change in Southern Ocean ventilation? Geochem Geophys Geosyst. 2000;1:1023. doi: 10.1029/2000GC000039. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Duplessy JC, Roche DM, Kageyama M. The deep ocean during the last interglacial period. Science. 2007;316:89–91. doi: 10.1126/science.1138582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Piotrowski AP, Goldstein SL, Hemming SR, Fairbanks RG. Temporal relationships of carbon cycling and ocean circulation at glacial boundaries. Science. 2005;307:1933–1938. doi: 10.1126/science.1104883. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Curry WB, Oppo DW. Glacial water mass geometry and the distribution of δ13C of ΣCO2 in the western Atlantic Ocean. Paleoceanography. 2005;20 doi: 10.1029/2004PA001021. PA1017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Poole C. Did ice shelf cover for inner Pine Island Bay (Amundsen Sea, West Antarctica) persist until the latest Holocene? MGeol thesis, Department of Geology; University of Leicester, UK: 2012. p. 83. [Google Scholar]
- 83.Mackensen A, Grobe H, Kuhn G, Fütterer DK. Benthic foraminiferal assemblages from the eastern Weddell Sea between 68 and 73 °S: Distribution, ecology and fossilization potential. Marine Micropal. 1990;16:241–283. [Google Scholar]
- 84.Murray JW, Pudsey CJ. Living (stained) and dead foraminifera from the newly ice-free Larsen Ice Shelf, Weddell Sea, Antarctica: ecology and taphonomy$ Marine Micropal. 2004;53:67–81. [Google Scholar]
- 85.Mikhalevich VI. The general aspects of the distribution of Antarctic foraminifera. Micropaleontology. 2004;50:179–194. [Google Scholar]
- 86.Murray JW. An Atlas of British Recent Foraminiferids. Heinemann; London: 1971. p. 244. [Google Scholar]
- 87.Murray JW. Revised taxonomy, an atlas of British Recent foraminiferids. J Micropal. 2000;19:44. [Google Scholar]
- 88.Schweizer M, Pawlowski J, Duijnstee IAP, Kouwenhoven TJ, van der Zwaan GJ. Molecular phylogeny of the foraminiferal genus Uvigerina based on ribosomal DNA sequences. Mar Micropal. 2005;57:51–67. [Google Scholar]
- 89.Schweizer M, Jorissen F, Geslin E. Contributions of molecular phylogenetics to foraminiferal taxonomy: General overview and example of Pseudoeponides falsobeccarii Rouvillois, 1974. Comptes Rendus Palevol. 2011;10:95–105. [Google Scholar]
- 90.Mackensen A, Schumacher S, Radke J, Schmidt DN. Microhabitat preferences and stable carbon isotopes of endobenthic foraminifera: clue to quantitative reconstruction of oceanic new production? Mar Micropal. 2000;40:233–258. [Google Scholar]
- 91.Randall-Goodwin E, et al. Freshwater distributions and water mass structure in the Amundsen Sea Polynya region, Antarctica. Elem Sci Anth. 2015;3 doi: 10.12952/journal.elementa.000065. 000065. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Coplen TB, Kendall C, Hopple J. Comparison of stable isotope reference samples. Nature. 1983;302:236–238. [Google Scholar]
- 93.Vilks G. Comparison of Globorotalia pachyderma (Ehrenberg) in the water column and sediments of the Canadian Arctic. J Foram Res. 1975;5:313–325. [Google Scholar]
- 94.Bergami C, Capotondi L, Langone L, Giglio F, Ravaioli M. Distribution of living planktonic foraminifera in the Ross Sea and the Pacific sector of the Southern Ocean (Antarctica) Marine Micropal. 2009;73:37–48. [Google Scholar]
- 95.Kohfeld KE, Fairbanks RG, Smith SL, Walsh ID. Neogloboquadrina pachyderma (sinistral coiling) as paleoceanographic tracers in polar oceans: Evidence from Northeast Water Polynya plankton tows, sediment traps, and surface sediments. Paleoceanography. 1996;11:679–699. [Google Scholar]
- 96.Schiebel R, Hemleben C. Modern planktic foraminifera. Paläontologische Zeitschrift. 2005;79:135–148. [Google Scholar]
- 97.Henrich R. Glacial/interglacial cycles in the Norwegian Sea: sedimentology, paleoceanography, and evolution of Late Pliocene to Quaternary Northern Hemisphere climate. Eldholm O, Thiede J, Taylor E, et al., editors. Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program, Scientific Results. 1989;104:189–232. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The stable isotope (δ13C, δ18O), trace metal (Mg/Ca, Mn/Ca), XRF scanner (Ba/Ti, Ba/Zr), benthic foraminifer assemblage and chronological (AMS 14C, 210Pb) data reported in this paper are available in the PANGAEA database under doi:10.1594/PANGAEA.XXX [number to be assigned after final acceptance] and from the corresponding author by request. Metadata, detailed core descriptions, X-radiographs, physical properties and grain size data of the cores are available under doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.751493.