Abstract
Mitochondria act as a platform for antiviral innate immunity, and the immune system depends on activation of the retinoic acid-inducible gene I (RIG-I)-like receptors (RLR) signaling pathway via an adaptor molecule, mitochondrial antiviral signaling. We report that RLR-mediated antiviral innate immunity requires oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) activity, a prominent physiologic function of mitochondria. Cells lacking mitochondrial DNA or mutant cells with respiratory defects exhibited severely impaired virus-induced induction of interferons and proinflammatory cytokines. Recovery of the OXPHOS activity in these mutants, however, re-established RLR-mediated signal transduction. Using in vivo approaches, we found that mice with OXPHOS defects were highly susceptible to viral infection and exhibited significant lung inflammation. Studies to elucidate the molecular mechanism of OXPHOS-coupled immune activity revealed that optic atrophy 1, a mediator of mitochondrial fusion, contributes to regulate the antiviral immune response. Our findings provide evidence for functional coordination between RLR-mediated antiviral innate immunity and the mitochondrial energy-generating system in mammals.
Introduction
Innate immunity is a ubiquitous system that widely protects organisms from infectious pathogens as a front-line host defense mechanism. The immune response is triggered by the recognition of broadly conserved microbial components, known as pathogen-associated molecular patterns, by germline-encoded pattern recognition receptors of the host cells1. As an early defense system against RNA viruses in mammals, the innate immune response is precisely controlled by two distinct signal transduction pathways mediated by the pattern recognition receptors Toll-like receptor 3 (TLR-3) and retinoic acid-inducible gene I (RIG-I)-like receptors (RLR) that respond to virus-derived RNAs2, 3 (i.e., pathogen-associated molecular patterns). Although the two pathways differ with respect to the initial activation of their downstream effectors, they converge at the point of activation of the transcriptional factors interferon regulatory factor 3 (IRF-3) and nuclear factor κB (NF-κB), which results in the rapid production of type I interferons (IFN-α and -β) and other proinflammatory cytokines to establish adaptive antiviral immunity4.
Mitochondria, eukaryotic cell powerhouses, are crucially involved in numerous cellular processes, including apoptosis5 and calcium homeostasis6. Mitochondria also have a unique role in innate immunity against RNA viruses7. Mitochondrial-mediated antiviral immunity depends on activation of the RLR signaling pathway, and mitochondrial antiviral signaling (MAVS), a downstream adaptor of RLR at the mitochondrial outer membrane (MOM), has a key role in the signal transduction8, 9. Upon viral infection, MAVS recruits various types of effectors at the MOM, and the orchestrated “MAVS signalosome”, including the mitochondrial membrane potential (Δψm), is the primary unit governing antiviral innate immunity10, 11. Although the role of the MAVS signalosome in mitochondria with its dynamic morphologic properties12 to provide a molecular platform that facilitates signal transduction is well characterized, insight into how the organelle functions to facilitate antiviral immunity through the activity of oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) has remained unclear.
Results and Discussion
Cultured cells rely on mitochondrial respiratory activity
To evaluate the functional coordination of mitochondrial-mediated antiviral immunity and OXPHOS activity, we first sought to determine optimal cell culture conditions in which the cellular bioenergetics would rely on mitochondrial respiratory activity. We used a fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET)-based assay to visualize metabolized intracellular adenosine 5′-triphosphate (ATP) at the single-cell level in human embryonic kidney 293 (HEK293) cells expressing an ATP probe, ATeam1.0313. The biosensor assay performed with cells cultured under our customized medium containing galactose (10 mM) as the carbon source revealed high FRET signal [based on an emission ratio of 527/475 nm (denoted YFP/CFP)] in individual cells [Fig. 1A, galactose panels, (−)], indicating that cells maintained adequate intracellular ATP levels. The intracellular ATP level, however, which affects the YFP/CFP ratio, was dramatically decreased (~2.5-fold) by the addition of electron transport chain (ETC) inhibitors (rotenone and antimycin A), an ATP synthase inhibitor (oligomycin), or a protonophore [carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone (CCCP)] to the media [Fig. 1A, galactose panels, (+), and B], demonstrating that energy production in the cells critically depends on mitochondrial OXPHOS. In contrast, cells maintained in a customized medium containing glucose (10 mM) exhibited no significant decrease in the intracellular ATP level, even after treatment with the pharmacologic drugs (Fig. 1A,B). These results clearly demonstrated that the cellular bioenergetics are less dependent on OXPHOS activity in the presence of glucose, and that cellular ATP production predominantly relies on glycolysis.
Validation of the RLR signaling pathway under oxidative conditions
We examined RLR-mediated signal transduction under the galactose-containing oxidative condition. Under oxidative conditions, similar to the glucose condition, ectopic expression of MAVS in HEK293 cells potently activated both IFN-β and NF-κB luciferase reporters in a dose-dependent manner (Supplementary Fig. S1A). The OXPHOS-dependent RLR-mediated signal transduction was also confirmed by stimulating cells transfected with either a plasmid encoding RIG-I(1–250) (Supplementary Fig. S1B) or a synthetic analog of viral double-stranded RNA [dsRNA; poly(I:C)] (Supplementary Fig. S1C and D), both of which are upstream factors of MAVS3. The kinetic response of IRF-3 phosphorylation (a hallmark of IRF-3 activation) in cells against infection by Sendai virus (SeV), a negative-stranded RNA virus of the Paramyxoviridae family, in the OXPHOS-dependent condition was also similar to that in the glucose condition (Fig. 2A). The RIG-I-mediated activation of the IFN-β reporter in the OXPHOS-dependent condition was sufficiently impaired by co-expression of a hepatitis C virus serine protease NS3/4A (an inhibitor of the RLR signaling pathway)14, 15 [Fig. 2B, wild-type (WT)], whereas its inactive mutant (S139A) had no functional effect, indicating that the observed signal transduction occurred via RLR-dependent signaling pathway.
We next analyzed the structural features of MAVS activation accompanied by RLR-mediated signal transduction, homotypic oligomerization at the MOM11, when cells were dependent on the oxidative condition. The interaction between ectopically expressed Venus- and NanoLuc luciferase (NLuc)-tagged MAVS with co-expression of the S139A mutant was successfully monitored, and a bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET)-based assay16 revealed a hyperbolic saturation curve characteristic of a specific interaction (Fig. 2C, squares). Importantly, the specificity of the observed MAVS-MAVS interaction was verified by the disappearance of the saturated curve when the WT NS3/4A protease was co-expressed in cells due to MAVS cleavage14 (Fig. 2C, circles, also see immunoblot). We further verified the antiviral immune response of primary mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) against SeV infection in the OXPHOS-dependent condition. Gene expression profiling of MEFs showing its dependence on the oxidative condition (Supplementary Fig. S2, upregulation of OXPHOS genes) revealed the expected induction of numerous IFN-stimulated and antiviral-signaling genes in response to the viral infection, similar to that observed in the glucose condition (Fig. 2D). Consistent with the aforementioned assays, we also observed that the antiviral immune response of macrophages cultured under the oxidative conditions was intensively upregulated upon SeV infection (Fig. 2E).
RLR-mediated antiviral innate immunity requires OXPHOS activity
Because altering the energy metabolism in cells through the activity of OXPHOS could accomplish the antiviral immune response, we next asked whether arresting OXPHOS activity would disrupt RLR-mediated signal transduction. IRF-3 phosphorylation in cells responding to SeV infection was completely suppressed by the addition of ETC inhibitors to the medium under oxidative conditions (Figs 3A and S3). The functionality of the cells treated with the pharmacologic drugs under these conditions, however, was unaffected when the cells were either stimulated with extracellular poly(I:C) (Supplementary Fig. S4A) or infected with a double-stranded DNA virus, Herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) (Supplementary Fig. S4B), which activates the TLR-3 or cGAS/STING cytosolic DNA sensing pathways, respectively. Influenza A virus (IAV; PR8 strain), an RNA virus of the Orthomyxoviridae family, encodes the viral protein PB1-F2 that translocates into mitochondria and induces mitochondrial depolarization17–20. Using the viral strain, we observed severe PB1-F2–induced inhibition of RLR signaling in cells that depended on OXPHOS (Fig. 3B, WT); the inhibitory effect was attenuated, however, when we used a recombinant virus with genetic ablation of the PB1-F2 gene (ΔF2)21. These observations suggest that the severity of the mitochondrial dysfunction correlates with the severity of the defect in the RLR-induced antiviral response.
We next used a genetic approach to examine whether mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), which is essential for mitochondrial OXPHOS activity22, modulates RLR-mediated signal transduction. Mouse fibrosarcoma B82 cells devoid of mtDNA (ρ0 B82)23 (Supplementary Fig. S5A) produced less IFN-β and IL-6 against SeV infection, although the immune response was fully rescued in a cell cybrid harboring WT mtDNA (Fig. 3C), despite the fact that both cell types had adequate energy due to the use of a high glucose medium (25 mM) with pyruvate and uridine (Supplementary Fig. S5B) or the same infection level (Supplementary Fig. S5C). Conversely, ρ0 B82 cells had substantial antiviral responses against HSV-1 infection (Fig. 3D), consistent with a previous observation24. To confirm that these observations were not due to specific characteristics of the cell type we used, we performed the same experiment in HeLa cells lacking mtDNA25 (ρ0 HeLa), and found that ρ0 HeLa cells also exhibited defective antiviral innate immune responses against SeV infection (Supplementary Fig. S5D and E). In addition, transient depletion of mtDNA in macrophages (mtDNA-less J774A.1) treated with rhodamine 6G exhibited an impaired immune response against SeV infection (Fig. 3E). Taken together, these findings indicated that RLR-mediated signal transduction requires OXPHOS activity to execute antiviral immune responses.
Pathogenic mtDNA mutations cause defects in antiviral innate immunity
The importance of mtDNA in the regulation of RLR-mediated signal transduction prompted us to explore the phenotypic effects of pathogenic mtDNA mutations on antiviral immunity. We used human osteosarcoma cybrid 143B cells harboring homoplasmic pathogenic mtDNA mutations: the ND1 cybrid26 (complex I dysfunction), which is associated with Leber hereditary optic neuropathy, carrying a missense mutation at 3460/ND1 (Supplementary Fig. S6A); and the COX cybrid27 (missing complex IV), which is associated with mitochondrial encephalopathy, carrying a stop codon mutation at 6930/COXI (Supplementary Fig. S6B), both of which exhibit severe respiratory defects. As described, ρ0 cells from 143B cell lines also exhibited an impaired immune response against SeV infection (Fig. 4A,B). Remarkably, activation of the RLR-mediated antiviral signaling in the mutant cells (ND1 and COX) was severely disrupted (Fig. 4A,B) despite the indistinguishable MAVS pattern and energy supply (Supplementary Fig. S7A, B and C). Consistent with these results, both pathogenic mutants were more susceptible to viral infection (recombinant IAV-expressing GFP)28 than WT cells (Fig. 4C), due to defective mitochondrial-mediated immunity. Most importantly, the immunodeficiency observed in the ND1 cybrid, but not in the COX cybrid, was significantly recovered by the addition of succinate, a complex II substrate, to the media, suggesting that OXPHOS activity in ND1 mutant cells was driven by the substrate through complex II, which consequently restored its phenotype (Fig. 4D). Together, these results indicated that cells with defective OXPHOS activity due to mtDNA mutations have severely impaired RLR-mediated antiviral signaling.
Trans-mitochondrial mice (Mito-miceΔ) are susceptible to IAV infection
To evaluate whether our in vitro observations were physiologically relevant, we investigated the relationship between OXPHOS and antiviral innate immunity in vivo. We used 28-week-old trans-mitochondrial mice carrying mtDNA with a large-scale deletion (Mito-miceΔ)29 and challenged the mice with the IAV PR8 strain. Mito-miceΔ in a resting state had high blood lactate levels (7.2 ± 2 mmol/L) relative to those in WT mice (3.2 ± 0.4 mmol/L), showing lactic acidosis in the mutant mice. Although the mortality of Mito-miceΔ (n = 7) infected with IAV was not much worse than that of WT mice (n = 9) (Supplementary Fig. S8A), the Mito-miceΔ exhibited significant weight loss during the monitoring period (Fig. 5A; 17% of Mito-miceΔ versus 4% of WT on day 7). Given the higher pathogenicity in Mito-miceΔ following IAV-infection, we examined the physiologic effects of the infection on the lung tissue. In the lungs of WT mice infected with IAV, mild hyperemia and perivascular inflammatory cells infiltration around the bronchus were minimally observed, but few alveoli were injured by the infection (Fig. 5B, left panels). On the other hand, Mito-miceΔ infected with the virus had significant inflammation in whole lung tissues with desquamation of the bronchial epithelium (Fig. 5B, right panels, see arrowheads) and alveolar pneumocyte hyperplasia. Notably, virus-induced expression of endogenous IFN-β was impaired in the lungs of the Mito-miceΔ (Supplementary Fig. S8B), explaining the histopathologic observation of enhanced pathogenicity. We thus concluded that defective OXPHOS enhances the susceptibility to IAV infection in vivo, emphasizing the importance of mitochondrial respiration for modulating innate immunity.
OPA1-mediated execution of antiviral innate immunity
To elucidate the molecular basis of OXPHOS activity coupled with the RLR signaling pathway, we speculated that optic atrophy 1 (OPA1), a mediator of mitochondrial fusion30, has a role in antiviral innate immunity12 because of its stabilizing effects on mtDNA31 and the cristae structure32, 33, both of which contribute to regulating mitochondrial respiration. As reported previously, we observed that OPA1 −/− cells contained less mtDNA (Fig. 6A), completely lacked mitochondrial fusion (Supplementary Fig. S9A), and had a disrupted cristae morphology (Supplementary Fig. S9B). These phenotypic defects were restored when a WT OPA1 isoform gene (L-OPA1; variant 1), but not an inactive mutant K301A or short isoform (S-OPA1), was re-introduced into null cells. Strikingly, although the OPA1 −/− cells exhibited severely impaired SeV-induced production of IFN-β and IL-6 (Fig. 6B), the immune responses were substantially restored by recovery of the mtDNA level in rescued cells [Figs 6A,C and S9C; V1(WT)]. Given that OPA1 is important for mtDNA stability and the antiviral immune response, we used histochemical staining for cytochrome c oxidase (complex IV) activity to directly assess the OPA1 function involved in mitochondrial respiration. As expected, the COX staining pattern of the V1(WT)-rescued OPA1 −/− cells showed full recovery of the respiration defect, whereas K301A and S-OPA1 failed to rescue the COX activities (Fig. 6D). Taken together, these results indicate that functional actions of OPA1 are linked to the improvement of OXPHOS activity and the induction of mitochondrial-mediated antiviral innate immunity.
The findings of the present study using both in vitro and in vivo approaches provided new insight into how mitochondria facilitate antiviral immunity through OXPHOS activity. Mitochondria are believed to have evolved from organisms such as α-proteobacterium, and the discovery of their role in host-cell defense was unexpected. It is not surprising, however, that cells gaining respiratory function through a symbion could greatly advance not only through enhanced energy production, but also through safeguarded host defense against other infectious pathogens, especially in vertebrates.
Materials and Methods
Reagents
CCCP, rotenone, oligomycin, and antimycin A were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). Cytochrome c from horse heart was supplied by Nacalai Tesque Inc. (Kyoto, Japan) and 3,3′-diaminobenzidine was purchased from Tokyo Chemical Industry Co. Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan). Furimazine was supplied by Promega (Madison, WI) and poly(I:C) was purchased from InvivoGen (San Diego, CA). Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits for human and mouse IFN-β were supplied by Kamakura Techno-Science Inc. (Kanagawa, Japan) and PBL Assay Science (Piscataway, NJ), respectively. All other reagents were of biochemical research grade.
Antibodies
A polyclonal antibody against IRF-3 (FL-425; 1:2000) and monoclonal antibody against β-actin (C4; 1:4000) were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Dallas, TX), and the rabbit monoclonal antibody against phosphorylated IRF-3 (pIRF-3) Ser386 (EPR2346; 1:2000) and polyclonal antibody against MAVS (ab25084; 1:1000) were from Abcam (Cambridge, MA). Monoclonal antibodies against Myc (9E10; 1;1000) and FLAG (M2; 1:1000) were obtained from Covance (Princeton, NJ) and Sigma-Aldrich, respectively. Monoclonal antibodies against phosphorylated IκBα (pIκBα) Ser32/36 (5A5; 1:1000), phosphorylated NF-κB p65 (pNF-κB p65) Ser536 (93H1; 1:2000) and NF-κB p65 (D14E12; 1:3000) were supplied by Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA), and the monoclonal antibody against OPA1 (1:2000) was from BD Biosciences (San Jose, CA). The anti-human and anti-mouse IL-6 antibodies used for ELISA were obtained from eBioscience, and a polyclonal antibody against SeV (PD029; 1:1000) was purchased from MBL (Nagoya, Japan). Monoclonal antibodies against mtCO1 (1D6E1A8; 1:1000) and mitochondrial heat shock protein 70 (mtHsp70; 1:2000) were purchased from Molecular Probes/Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA) and Affinity BioReagents (Golden, CO), respectively. The Alexa Fluor 488–conjugated polyclonal antibody against rabbit immunoglobulin G (IgG) and Alexa Fluor 568–conjugated polyclonal antibody against rabbit IgG (1:500) were obtained from Molecular Probes-Invitrogen, and the Cy3-conjugated sheep anti-mouse IgG (1:1000) monoclonal antibody was purchased from Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories (West Grove, PA). A monoclonal antibody against PB1-F2 (A/PR8 strain; 1:10) was a kind gift from Viktor Wixler (Münster University Hospital Medical School).
Plasmids
Plasmids encoding human MAVS variants, hRIG-I(1–250), NS3/4A variants, and the ATeam1.03 were described previously13, 16, 20, 34. Plasmid encoding rat OPA1 was a gift from Naotada Ishihara (Kurume University, Japan). To generate the retroviral expression constructs, each cDNA was recloned into the retroviral vector pMXs-Puro (Cell Biolabs, San Diego, CA). The retroviral expression vectors were then transfected into the platinum packaging cell lines (Cell Biolabs), and the retroviral supernatant was harvested 48 h post-transfection and used to infect cells.
Cell lines and viruses
HEK293, MEF, and J774A.1 cells were maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (high glucose; 4,500 mg/L; GIBCO BRL) supplemented with 1% GlutaMAX, penicillin (100 U/mL)-streptomycin (100 μg/mL), and 10% fetal bovine serum at 5% CO2 and 37 °C. The ρ0 cells (lacking mtDNA) from HeLa, B82 (mouse fibrosarcoma), and 143B (human osteosarcoma) and its WT or mutant mtDNA cybrids were similarly maintained, except with the addition of sodium pyruvate (110 mg/L) and uridine (50 μg/mL; ρ0 medium). The mtDNA-less J774A.1 macrophages were pretreated with rhodamine 6 G (0.06 μg/mL in ρ0 medium) for 48 h to transiently eliminate endogenous mtDNA. For glucose-free culture experiments, glycolytic (glucose) and oxidative (galactose) media were customized according to previously published protocols35 with slight modifications; the glycolytic medium was distinct from the high glucose medium used to maintain the cultures. The customized medium was based on glucose and glutamine-free Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (GIBCO; A14430–01) externally supplemented with 10% dialyzed fetal bovine serum (GIBCO; 26400–044), 2% GlutaMAX, penicillin (100 U/mL)-streptomycin (100 μg/mL), and either 10 mM glucose (glycolytic) or 10 mM galactose (oxidative), respectively. Sendai virus Cantell strain was purchased from the American Type Culture Collection, and the recombinant influenza viruses A/PR8 (ΔF2)21 and IAV-GFP28 were a generous gift from Jonathan A. McCullers (St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital) and Adolfo García-Sastre (Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai), respectively.
Viral infection in vivo
Twenty eight-week-old C57BL/6 mice were anesthetized with isoflurane and inoculated intranasally with 50 μL containing 1 × 103 PFU of A/PR8. One group of mice was mock-infected with sterile phosphate buffered saline (PBS) as a control. Mice were observed daily for weight loss and mortality for 14 days. For histopathologic analysis, dissected lung tissues were fixed in 3.5% formaldehyde and paraffin-embedded. Tissues were sliced into 6-μm-thick paraffin sections and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. To determine the level of IFN-β mRNA, mice were euthanized 4 days post-infection, and the total RNAs were purified from 30 mg of lung tissue homogenate using an RNeasy Kit (Qiagen). All animal experiments were carried out in a humane manner after receiving approval from the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Tsukuba, and in accordance with the regulation for Animal Experiments in University of Tsukuba and Fundamental Guideline for Proper Conduct of Animal Experiment and Related Activities in Academic Research Institutions under the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology.
Luciferase assays
HEK293 cells were plated in 24-well plates (2.5 × 105 cells per well) in the customized media. The following day, the cells were co-transfected with 100 ng luciferase reporter plasmid (p125luc or pELAM), 2.5 ng Renilla luciferase internal control vector phRL-TK (Promega), and each of the indicated expression plasmids with Lipofectamine 2000 reagent (Invitrogen). Empty vector [pcDNA3.1(−)] was used to maintain equivalent amounts of DNA in each well. Cells were harvested 24 h after transfection and analyzed by a dual-luciferase reporter assay on the GloMax 20/20n luminometer (Promega). Each experiment was repeated at least three times.
BRET assay
All BRET saturation assays were performed as previously described16 with slight modifications. In brief, HEK293 cells (5 × 105 cells per well) cultured under customized media were co-transfected with a constant amount (5 ng) of NLuc-tagged MAVS plasmid and increasing amounts of Venus-tagged MAVS constructs using Lipofectamine 2000 reagent. Empty vector [pcDNA3.1(−)] was used to maintain equivalent amounts of DNA in each well. The cells were harvested at 21 h post-transfection and transferred to each well of white 96-well microplates. NLuc substrate (furimazine; 5 μM) was added, and the plates were analyzed via a BRET saturation assay using a Flexstation 3 Microplate Reader (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA) at 37 °C.
ELISA
Measurements of species-specific IFN-β and IL-6 production were performed as described previously20, 36.
Microarray analysis
Total RNA was isolated from each cultured condition of primary MEFs using TRIzol Reagent (Invitrogen) and purified using SV Total RNA Isolation System (Promega) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. RNA samples were quantified using an ND-1000 spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies, Wilmington, DE) and the quality was confirmed with an Experion System (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA). The cRNA was amplified, labeled (Low Input Quick Amp Labeling Kit), and hybridized to the SurePrint G3 Mouse Gene Expression 8 × 60 K microarray according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA). All hybridized microarray slides were scanned by an Agilent scanner (Agilent Technologies). Relative hybridization intensities and background hybridization values were calculated using Agilent Feature Extraction Software (9.5.1.1). Raw signal intensities and flags for each probe were calculated from the hybridization intensities (gProcessedSignal), and spot information (gIsSaturated, etc.), according to the procedures recommended by Agilent. The raw signal intensities of four samples were normalized by a quantile algorithm with the ‘preprocessCore’ library package37 of the Bioconductor software38. To identify upregulated or downregulated genes, we calculated the Z-scores39 and ratios (non-log scaled fold-change) from the normalized signal intensities of each probe to compare between control and experiment samples, and established criteria for regulated genes: Z-score ≥2.0 and ratio ≥1.5-fold for upregulated genes, and Z-score ≤−2.0 and ratio ≤0.66 for downregulated genes, respectively.
Visualization of cytoplasmic ATP in living cells
Imaging of cytoplasmic ATP levels in living cells was performed as previously described13, 40. Briefly, cells expressing ATeam1.03 were plated on collagen-coated 35-mm glass-bottom dishes (MatTek, Ashland, MA). The following day, the cells were washed once with the customized media and the cells were subjected to ATP imaging. Observations of cells that were maintained at 5% CO2 and 37 °C using a stage-top incubator (Tokai Hit, Shizuoka, Japan) were performed using a Nikon ECLIPSE Ti-E microscope with an oil-immersion type CFI Plan Apo VC 60x lens (Nikon Instruments Inc, Tokyo, Japan). The filters, 438/24-nm BrightLine single-band bandpass filter (FF01–438/24–25), 458-nm edge BrightLine single-edge dichroic mirror (FF458-Di02), and two emission filters (FF01–483/32 and FF01–542/27) used for dual-emission ratio imaging of ATeam1.03 were obtained from Semrock Inc. (Rochester, NY). Fluorescence emission from the ATeam1.03 was imaged by altering the emission filters with a filter changer and a scientific CMOS camera (Zyla 4.2, Andor Technology), and the imaging analysis was performed using MetaMorph (Molecular Devices). The YFP/CFP emission ratio was calculated by dividing the YFP intensity by the CFP intensity of each cell.
Confocal microscopy
Cells were plated on coverslips in 12-well plates (1.5 × 105 cells per well). The following day, cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min, permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X-100 in PBS (pH 7.4), and blocked with 5% bovine calf serum. Endogenous MAVS was detected with the polyclonal primary and AlexaFluor488 secondary antibodies, and mitochondria were stained with anti-mtHsp70 primary antibody followed by the Cy3-conjugated secondary antibody. Cells were imaged with the C2+ confocal microscope (Nikon Instruments Inc).
Electron microscopy analysis
For electron microscopy, cells were fixed in 100 mM cacodylate buffer (pH 7.4) containing 2% paraformaldehyde and 2% glutaraldehyde (GA) for 1 h, washed and fixed again with 100 mM cacodylate buffer containing 2% GA overnight at 4 °C. After fixation, the cells were washed four times with 100 mM cacodylate buffer for 20 min each, and postfixed with 2% osmium tetroxide (OsO4) in cacodylate buffer at 4 °C for 1 h. Cells were then dehydrated in a graded series of ethanol (50%, 70%, 90%, and 100%), embedded in resin (Quetol 812, Nisshin EM Co., Japan), and polymerized at 60 °C for 48 h. The polymerized resins were cut in ultra-thin sections at 70 nm with an LEICA UTC ultramicrotome, mounted on copper grids, and stained with 2% uranyl acetate and lead solution (Sigma-Aldrich). Images were collected with a transmission electron microscope (JEM-1400Plus; JEOL Ltd, Japan) operating at 80 kV and equipped with a CCD camera (VELETA; Olympus Soft Imaging Solutions GmbH, Germany).
Quantification of mtDNA
Total genomic DNA was extracted and purified from cells, and diluted to 5 ng/μL. To quantify the amount of mtDNA per nuclear DNA, quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) was performed using FastStart Essential DNA Green Master (Roche). Quantification of relative copy number differences was performed based on the difference in the threshold amplification between mtDNA and nuclear DNA [ΔΔC(t) method]. We used the following sets of primers for mtDNA: TK702 (5′-cctatcacccttgccatcat, forward) and TK703 (5′-gaggctgttgcttgtgtgac, reverse); and for nuclear DNA: TK704 (5′-atggaaagcctgccatcatg, forward) and TK705 (5′-tccttgttgttcagcatcac, reverse).
Cytochemical analysis of cytochrome c oxidase (COX) activity
COX staining was performed as previously described41 with slight modifications. MEFs plated on 18-mm coverslips were fixed with 2% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 15 min and washed twice with PBS for 5 min each. To visualize COX activity, cells were stained with 100 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) containing 0.6 mg/mL 3′,3′-diaminobenzidine, 0.3 mg/mL cytochrome c, and 45 mg/mL sucrose at 37 °C for 2 h. Cells were then washed twice with 0.1 M Tris-HCl buffer (pH 8.0) for 5 min each and analyzed by microscopy.
Statistical analysis
An analysis of variance test (GraphPad QuickCalcs) was used for the statistical analyses. A P-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Electronic supplementary material
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Thomas Langer (University of Cologne) for helpful discussions regarding the study. We also thank Katsuyoshi Mihara (Kyushu University), Yuichi Michikawa (National Institute of Radiological Sciences, Japan), and Mitsuyasu Kato (University of Tsukuba) for their valuable comments on the study. We appreciate Yuko Fuchigami and Norio Sasaoka for their technical assistance with DNA cloning, sequencing, establishing the cell line expressing ATeam1.03, and technical comments on the figure preparation. We are also grateful for technical support regarding the fluorescence measurements (BRET assay) from the Research Support Center, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University. The 143B COX and ND1 cybrids were a generous gift from Giovanni Manfredi (Cornell University) and Valerio Carelli (University of Bologna, Italy), respectively, and OPA1-null MEFs were obtained from David Chan (HHMI and Caltech). This work was supported by the JSPS KAKENHI Grants (No. 15H01265, 17H03667, 26291032, and 26620135 to T.K.), the Daiichi Sankyo Foundation of Life Science, the Japan Foundation for Applied Enzymology, the Takeda Science Foundation, the Naito Foundation, the NOVARTIS Foundation (Japan) for the Promotion of Science, the Life Science Foundation of Japan, and KANEKA Corporation to T.K, and partly supported by a Grant-in-Aid for JSPS Fellow (T.Y.).
Author Contributions
T.Y. and T.K. performed most of the in vitro experiments. H.I. established the biosensor ATeam1.03 and analyzed the cellular ATP level. K.N. and K.I. established the Mito-miceΔ and ρ0 cells from cultured human and murine cells. A.K., T.T., and T. Kuroki performed the mouse infection experiments and K.I. analyzed the histopathologic analysis. T.Y., H.I., A.K., T.T., T. Kuroki, K.I., K.N., and T.K. analyzed the data and interpreted all the experimental results. T.K. designed the research program and contributed to writing the paper.
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Footnotes
Electronic supplementary material
Supplementary information accompanies this paper at doi:10.1038/s41598-017-05808-w
Accession code: The GEO accession number for the microarray data reported in this paper is GSE75399.
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Hoffmann JA, Kafatos FC, Janeway CA, Jr., Ezekowitz RAB. Phylogenetic perspectives in innate immunity. Science. 1999;284:1313–1318. doi: 10.1126/science.284.5418.1313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kawai T, Akira S. Innate immune recognition of viral infection. Nat. Immunol. 2006;7:131–137. doi: 10.1038/ni1303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Meylan E, Tschopp J. Toll-like receptors and RNA helicases: two parallel ways to trigger antiviral responses. Mol. Cell. 2006;22:561–569. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2006.05.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Iwasaki A, Medzhitov R. Regulation of adaptive immunity by the innate immune system. Science. 2010;327:291–295. doi: 10.1126/science.1183021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Wang C, Youle RJ. The role of mitochondria in apoptosis. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2009;43:95–118. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genet-102108-134850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Rizzuto R, De Stefani D, Raffaello A, Mammucari C. Mitochondria as sensors and regulators of calcium signalling. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2012;13:566–578. doi: 10.1038/nrm3412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Seth RB, Sun L, Ea CK, Chen ZJ. Identification and characterization of MAVS, a mitochondrial antiviral signalling protein that activates NF-κB and IRF3. Cell. 2005;122:669–682. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.08.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kumar H, et al. Essential role of IPS-1 in innate immune responses against RNA viruses. J. Exp. Med. 2006;203:1795–1803. doi: 10.1084/jem.20060792. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Sun Q, et al. The specific and essential role of MAVS in antiviral innate immune responses. Immunity. 2006;24:633–642. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2006.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.West AP, Shadel GS, Ghosh S. Mitochondria in innate immune responses. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2011;11:389–402. doi: 10.1038/nri2975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Koshiba T. Mitochondrial-mediated antiviral immunity. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2013;1833:225–232. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2012.03.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Castanier C, Garcin D, Vazquez A, Arnoult D. Mitochondrial dynamics regulate the RIG-I-like receptor antiviral pathway. EMBO Rep. 2010;11:133–138. doi: 10.1038/embor.2009.258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Imamura H, et al. Visualization of ATP levels inside single living cells with fluorescence resonance energy transfer-based genetically encoded indicators. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2009;106:15651–15656. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0904764106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Li XD, Sun L, Seth RB, Pineda G, Chen ZJ. Hepatitis C virus protease NS3/4A cleaves mitochondrial antiviral signalling protein off the mitochondria to evade innateimmunity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2005;102:17717–17722. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0508531102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Meylan E, et al. Cardif is an adaptor protein in the RIG-I antiviral pathway and is targeted by hepatitis C virus. Nature. 2005;437:1167–1172. doi: 10.1038/nature04193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Sasaki O, et al. A structural perspective of the MAVS-regulatory mechanism on the mitochondrial outer membrane using bioluminescence resonance energy transfer. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2013;1833:1017–1027. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2013.01.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Chen W, et al. A novel influenza A virus mitochondrial protein that induces cell death. Nat. Med. 2001;7:1306–1312. doi: 10.1038/nm1201-1306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Gibbs JS, Malide D, Hornung F, Bennink JR, Yewdell JW. The influenza A virus PB1-F2 protein targets the inner mitochondrial membrane via a predicted basic amphipathic helix that disrupts mitochondrial function. J. Virol. 2003;77:7214–7224. doi: 10.1128/JVI.77.13.7214-7224.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Zamarin D, García-Sastre A, Xiao X, Wang R, Palese P. Influenza virus PB1-F2 protein induces cell death through mitochondrial ANT3 and VDAC1. PLoS Pathog. 2005;1:e4. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.0010004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Yoshizumi T, et al. Influenza A virus protein PB1-F2 translocates into mitochondria via Tom40 channels and impairs innate immunity. Nat. Commun. 2014;5:4713. doi: 10.1038/ncomms5713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.McAuley JL, et al. Expression of the 1918 Influenza A virus PB1-F2 enhances the pathogenesis of viral and secondary bacterial pneumonia. Cell Host Microbe. 2007;2:240–249. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2007.09.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Attardi G, Schatz G. Biogenesis of mitochondria. Annu. Rev. Cell Biol. 1988;4:289–333. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cb.04.110188.001445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Inoue K, et al. Isolation and characterization of mitochondrial DNA-less lines from various mammalian cell lines by application of an anticancer drug, ditercalinium. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1997;239:257–260. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1997.7446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.West AP, et al. Mitochondrial DNA stress primes the antiviral innate immune response. Nature. 2015;520:553–557. doi: 10.1038/nature14156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Hayashi J, et al. Introduction of disease-related mitochondrial DNA deletions into HeLa cells lacking mitochondrial DNA results in mitochondrial dysfunction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1991;88:10614–10618. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.23.10614. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Baracca A, et al. Severe impairment of complex I-driven adenosine triphosphate synthesis in leber hereditary optic neuropathy cybrids. Arch. Neurol. 2005;62:730–736. doi: 10.1001/archneur.62.5.730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.D’Aurelio M, Gajewski CD, Lenaz G, Manfredi G. Respiratory chain supercomplexes set the threshold for respiration defects in human mtDNA mutant cybrids. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2006;15:2157–2169. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddl141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Manicassamy B, et al. Analysis of in vivo dynamics of influenza virus infection in mice using a GFP reporter virus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2010;107:11531–11536. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0914994107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Inoue K, et al. Generation of mice with mitochondrial dysfunction by introducing mouse mtDNA carrying a deletion into zygotes. Nat. Genet. 2000;26:176–181. doi: 10.1038/82826. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Chen H, Chomyn A, Chan DC. Disruption of fusion results in mitochondrial heterogeneity and dysfunction. J. Biol. Chem. 2005;280:26185–26192. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M503062200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Chen H, et al. Mitochondrial fusion is required for mtDNA stability in skeletal muscle and tolerance of mtDNA mutations. Cell. 2010;141:280–289. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.02.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Cogliati S, et al. Mitochondrial cristae shape determines respiratory chain supercomplexes assembly and respiratory efficiency. Cell. 2013;155:160–171. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.08.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Patten DA, et al. OPA1-dependent cristae modulation is essential for cellular adaptation to metabolic demand. EMBO J. 2014;33:2676–2691. doi: 10.15252/embj.201488349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Yasukawa K, et al. Mitofusin 2 inhibits mitochondrial antiviral signaling. Sci. Signal. 2009;2:ra47. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2000287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Mishra P, Carelli V, Manfredi G, Chan DC. Proteolytic cleavage of Opa1 stimulates mitochondrial inner membrane fusion and couples fusion to oxidative phosphorylation. Cell Metab. 2014;19:630–641. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2014.03.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Koshiba T, Yasukawa K, Yanagi Y, Kawabata S. Mitochondrial membrane potential is required for MAVS-mediated antiviral signaling. Sci. Signal. 2011;4:ra7. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2001147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Bolstad BM, Irizarry RA, Astrand M, Speed TP. A comparison of normalization methods for high density oligonucleotide array data based on variance and bias. Bioinformatics. 2003;19:185–193. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/19.2.185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Gentleman RC, et al. Bioconductor: open software development for computational biology and bioinformatics. Genome Biol. 2004;5:R80. doi: 10.1186/gb-2004-5-10-r80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Quackenbush J. Microarray data normalization and transformation. Nat. Genet. 2002;32:496–501. doi: 10.1038/ng1032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Hidaka M, et al. Visualization of NO3−/NO2− dynamics in living cells by fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) imaging employing a rhizobial two-component regulatory system. J. Biol. Chem. 2016;291:2260–2269. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M115.687632. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Ishihara T, et al. Dynamics of mitochondrial DNA nucleoids regulated by mitochondrial fission is essential for maintenance of homogeneously active mitochondria during neonatal heart development. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2015;35:211–223. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01054-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Saeed AI, et al. TM4: a free, open-source system for microarray data management and analysis. BioTechniques. 2003;34:374–378. doi: 10.2144/03342mt01. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.