Abstract
Background & Aims
There is growing interest in the use of bone marrow cells to treat liver fibrosis, however, little is known about their antifibrotic efficacy or the identity of their effector cell(s). Sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) mediates egress of immune cells from the lymphoid organs into the lymphatic vessels; we investigated its role in the response of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) to liver fibrosis in mice.
Methods
Purified (c-kit+/sca1+/lin-) HSCs were infused repeatedly into mice undergoing fibrotic liver injury. Chronic liver injury was induced in BoyJ mice by injection of carbon tetrachloride (CCl4) or placement on a methionine-choline–deficient diet. Some mice were irradiated and given transplants of bone marrow cells from C57BL6 mice, with or without the S1P antagonist FTY720; we then studied HSC mobilization and localization. Migration of HSC lines was quantified in Transwell assays. Levels of S1P in liver, bone marrow, and lymph fluid were measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Liver tissues were collected and analyzed by immunohistochemical quantitative polymerase chain reaction and sphingosine kinase activity assays. We performed quantitative polymerase chain reaction analyses of the expression of sphingosine kinase 1 and 2, sphingosine-1-phosphate lyase 1, and sphingosine-1-phosphate phosphatase 1 in normal human liver and cirrhotic liver from patients with alcohol-related liver disease (n = 6).
Results
Infusions of HSCs into mice with liver injury reduced liver scarring based on picrosirius red staining (49.7% reduction in mice given HSCs vs control mice; P < .001), and hepatic hydroxyproline content (328 mg/g in mice given HSCs vs 428 mg/g in control mice; P < .01). HSC infusion also reduced hepatic expression of α-smooth muscle actin (0.19 ± 0.007-fold compared with controls; P < .0001) and collagen type I α 1 chain (0.29 ± 0.17-fold compared with controls; P < .0001). These antifibrotic effects were maintained with infusion of lymphoid progenitors that lack myeloid potential and were associated with increased numbers of recipient neutrophils and macrophages in liver. In studies of HSC cell lines, we found HSCs to recruit monocytes, and this process to require C-C motif chemokine receptor 2. In fibrotic liver tissue from mice and patients, hepatic S1P levels increased owing to increased hepatic sphingosine kinase-1 expression, which contributed to a reduced liver:lymph S1P gradient and limited HSC egress from the liver. Mice given the S1P antagonist (FTY720) with HSCs had increased hepatic retention of HSCs (1697 ± 247 cells in mice given FTY720 vs 982 ± 110 cells in controls; P < .05), and further reductions in fibrosis.
Conclusions
In studies of mice with chronic liver injury, we showed the antifibrotic effects of repeated infusions of purified HSCs. We found that HSCs promote recruitment of endogenous macrophages and neutrophils. Strategies to reduce SIP signaling and increase retention of HSCs in the liver could increase their antifibrotic activities and be developed for treatment of patients with liver fibrosis.
Keywords: Mouse Model, CCR2, Sphingolipid, Immune Cell Localization
Abbreviations used in this paper: α-SMA, α-smooth muscle actin; APC, allophycocyanin; BM, bone marrow; CCL, chemokine (C-C motif) ligand; CFSE, carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester; CLP, common lymphoid progenitors; CMP, common myeloid progenitors; DiR, 1,1′-dioctadecyl-3,3,3′,3′-tetramethylindotricarbocyanine iodide; HPC-7, hematopoietic progenitor cell line; HSC, hematopoietic stem cell; KSL, c-kit+ sca-1+ and lineageneg; MMP, matrix metalloproteinase; PSR, picrosirius red; SGPL1, sphingosine-1-phosphate lyase; SGPP1, sphingosine-1-phosphate phosphatase; S1P, sphingosine 1-phosphate; SphK1, sphingosine kinase 1
Editor's Notes.
Background and Context
There are no proven anti-fibrotic therapies in liver disease. Haematopoietic stem cells (HSC) have been suggested as being potentially efficacious in this setting, although this has not been well studied.
New Findings
Repeated injections of purified HSC markedly reduced liver fibrosis and improved liver function. This effect was increased by the co-administration of FTY720, a partial S1P receptor agonist, which enhanced their retention inside the liver.
Limitations
This study, while suggesting that HSC mediate their anti-fibrotic effect through recruitment of endogenous monocytes and neutrophils, does not conclusively identify the mechanisms mediating their anti-fibrotic effect.
Impact
There is a need for new therapies for patients with chronic liver disease, and this study demonstrates the therapeutic potential of treatment with HSC.
The incidence of chronic liver disease is increasing worldwide1 and is characterized by the progression of liver injury from hepatic fibrosis to cirrhosis, resulting in death from liver failure, complications of portal hypertension, or hepatocellular carcinoma.2 At present, liver transplantation remains the only curative treatment for end-stage liver disease but is limited by the availability of donor organs and the risks of lifelong immunosuppression.3, 4, 5 The development and resolution of hepatic fibrosis is recognized as a bidirectional process, with resolution of fibrosis mediated through degradation of hepatic collagen6 and apoptosis of activated hepatic myofibroblasts.7
Initial observations that bone marrow cells may contribute to hepatic repair and regeneration8, 9, 10 were followed by studies in animal models of chronic liver injury showing variable therapeutic effects.11, 12, 13, 14 Despite these mixed outcomes, multiple clinical studies of bone marrow (BM)-derived stem cell therapy already have been performed.15, 16, 17 The design of these studies has not permitted any meaningful conclusions and larger randomized controlled trials are underway.
The heterogeneous nature of the bone marrow cell populations studied to date has limited our understanding of their beneficial effects and prevented elucidation of potential mechanisms. Hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) reside with the bone marrow niche, provide continual renewal and replacement of all blood cell lineages,18 and can be isolated routinely using cell surface markers.19 The continual homeostatic recirculation of bone marrow stem cells recently was described and the bioactive sphingolipid sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) was identified as a key regulator of this process.20 An S1P concentration gradient between body compartments is established by varying tissue distribution of sphingosine kinase (SPHK1/2) and sphingosine-1-phosphate lyase (SGPL)/sphingosine-1-phosphate phosphatase (SGPP),21, 22 and this gradient regulates the egress of HSCs from peripheral tissue into draining lymphatics. Binding of FTY720, a functional antagonist, to S1P receptors results in internalization and ubiquitin-dependent degradation without downstream signaling, thus rendering cells unresponsive to S1P.23 This blocks egress of HSCs, resulting in an accumulation of HSCs within peripheral tissues.20
We studied the effect of chronic liver injury on HSC mobilization and recruitment to the liver and showed reduced hepatic fibrosis after repeated therapeutic administration of a purified population of HSCs. Furthermore, we observed changes in S1P expression in chronic liver injury and showed prolonged hepatic retention of HSCs after administration of FTY720, which resulted in a further significant reduction in liver fibrosis when administered in conjunction with c-kit+, sca-1+ and lineageneg (KSL) cell injections.
Materials and Methods
Murine Models of Liver Injury
Mice were housed in a temperature-controlled sterile animal facility with 12-hour light/dark cycles and free access to food and water. All experiments were conducted in accordance with the University of Birmingham ethics policy and the UK Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 (project license PPL 40/3201). C57/BL6 mice were obtained from Charles River Laboratories (London, UK) and BoyJ mice were obtained from a colony maintained at the Biomedical Services Unit of the University of Birmingham. To induce chronic liver injury, carbon tetrachloride (CCl4) (1 mg/kg diluted 1:4 in mineral oil; Sigma, London, UK) was injected twice weekly for 9 weeks, with control mice receiving mineral oil vehicle only. In separate experiments mice were fed either standard chow or a methionine-choline–deficient diet (MP Biomedical, London, UK) for 6 weeks.
Experimental Protocols
Six- to 8-week-old female BoyJ mice received twice-weekly intraperitoneal injection of CCl4 (1 mg/kg in mineral oil) for 6 weeks, and then were allocated randomly to receive either purified cells isolated from 6- to 8-week-old male C57BL6 mice as described, or no treatment. Cell injections were administered on the first day of weeks 7, 8, and 9 of liver injury, and mice were killed 1 week after the final cell injection and 72 hours after the final CCl4 injection. In some experiments FTY720 (Cayman Chemicals, Cambridge, UK; 1 mg/kg in phosphate-buffered saline + 0.1% dimethyl sulfoxide) or vehicle control was administered by intraperitoneal injection 3 times per week from week 6 until death.
Bone Marrow Transplantation
Six-week-old C57/BL6 mice received lethal irradiation (9 Gy in 2 divided doses) followed by transplantation via tail vein injection of 1 × 108 whole bone marrow cells isolated from 6-week-old BoyJ mice. After 4 weeks, mice were allocated randomly to receive either twice-weekly injection of CCl4 (1 mg/kg) or mineral oil vehicle, for 8 weeks followed by death.
Immunohistochemistry
Picrosirius red (PSR) staining was performed using 0.1% Direct Red 80 (Sigma) in saturated picric acid according to standard protocols. Quantification of PSR and α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) staining was performed by threshold analysis of 10 nonoverlapping randomly selected fields of view per slide at a magnification of 20× using ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD), and was expressed as the percentage of positive staining of the total area. F4/80 and Ly6G staining was quantified by counting individual positive cells in 6 nonoverlapping randomly selected fields of view per slide at magnifications of 20× and 100× and expressed as cells per field of view.
S1P and SphK Quantification
SphK activity was determined using the Sphingosine Kinase Activity Assay (K-3500; Echelon, Le-Perray-en-Yvelines, France) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. A standard curve was created and results were normalized to the protein content of the sample and time (pmol S1P/mg protein/min). S1P concentrations were measured using the sphingosine-1-phosphate enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit (K-1900; Echelon) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, S1P concentrations in serum and lymph fluid were expressed as molar quantities and in liver and bone marrow were normalized to the protein content of the sample (pmol S1P/mg protein).
Chemotaxis Assay
A total of 600 μL Stem Pro 34 serum-free media alone or containing the relevant concentration of S1P (Cayman Chemicals) was placed in individual wells of a 12-well plate (Corning, London, UK) and 6.5-mm Transwell inserts (5-μm pore diameter) placed in each well. A total of 100 μL of cell suspension (1 × 106 cells/mL) was added to the insert and incubated for 3 hours. Cell migration was assessed by quantification of the number of cells in each lower well using flow cytometry as described; migration was expressed as a percentage of the input cells in the lower well. S1P and FTY702-P were prepared by dissolving in 95% dimethyl sulfoxide/5% 1 N HCl (Sigma) and diluted for use in phosphate-buffered saline + 3% fatty acid free bovine serum albumin (Sigma). W146 (Sigma) was dissolved in methanol containing 0.05% acetic acid and diluted for use in cell culture media.
Cell Culture
Studies of HSC trafficking have been limited by difficulties in isolating a sufficient number of cells, in some experiments in this study we used an immortalized HSC line (hematopoietic progenitor cell line 7 [HPC-7]), which expresses common murine HSC markers and transcription factors,24 which have been used in previous studies of HSC recruitment.25 HPC-7 cells were cultured in StemPro Serum Free Media 34 (Invitrogen, London, UK) supplemented with penicillin, streptomycin, glutamine, and 100 ng/mL recombinant murine Stem Cell Factor (Invitrogen). For colony-forming unit assays cells were added to MethoCult GF media (Stem Cell Technologies, Cambridge, UK) and incubated for 10 days, and the total number of myeloid colonies per assay were determined by counting under low-power magnification.
Statistics
Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad (La Jolla, CA) Prism version 5.0. Differences between groups were analyzed using either the 2-tailed unpaired Student t test or multiple group comparisons with 1-way analysis of variance with Bonferroni post-test correction unless otherwise stated. A result was considered significant when the P value was less than .05.
Results
Bone Marrow–Derived HSCs Are Mobilized and Recruited to the Liver During Chronic Liver Injury
The effect of liver injury on the mobilization and recruitment of BM-derived HSCs was investigated in the model of CCl4-induced liver injury. Higher numbers of HSCs (KSL), were isolated from the peripheral blood (0.397 ± 0.05 vs 0.065 ± 0.07 KSL cells/μL blood; P < .001) and liver (1163 ± 173 vs 258.5 ± 22 KSL cells/liver; P < .01) of mice with a CCl4 injury compared with control mice (Figure 1B). There also were marked increases in colony-forming unit potential from cells isolated from liver and peripheral blood, but not BM, in CCl4 injury (Figure 1C). Similar results were seen in the setting of methionine-choline–deficient diet–induced liver injury. Liver resident populations of HSCs have been described (Taniguchi et al 199626) and further studies to confirm the bone marrow origin of the isolated KSL cells were performed. Bone marrow chimerism was established (Supplementary Figure 1) and donor BM-derived HSCs were identified as CD45.2+ KSL. Significant increases in CD45.2+ KSL cells were observed within the liver (788.2 ± 59 vs 292.6 ± 45; P < .01) and peripheral blood (0.333 ± 0.06 vs 0.077 ± 0.01; P < .01) of CCl4-injured mice (Figure 1D), whereas BM populations remained constant. Given the mobilization and hepatic recruitment of HSCs in liver injury the potential therapeutic benefits of administering purified HSCs was investigated.
Infused KSL Cells Reduce Fibrosis in the CCl4 Model of Liver Injury
KSL HSCs were isolated from donor bone marrow and purity of more than 96% was confirmed in all experiments (Supplementary Figure 2). Repeated injections of KSL cells (Figure 2A) resulted in a 49.7% reduction in hepatic fibrosis determined by PSR quantification (2.21% ± 0.12% vs 4.38% ± 0.27% staining; P < .0001) (Figure 2B), and by reduced hepatic hydroxyproline content (328.5 ± 30.4 vs 428.4 ± 31.9 μg/g liver; P < .05) (Figure 2C). Resolution of fibrosis is dependent on apoptosis of α-SMA+ myofibroblasts within the liver, and α-SMA staining was 65.6% lower after KSL cell injections (2.42 ± 0.2 vs 7.05 ± 0.33; P < .0001) (Figure 2D) and was associated with down-regulation of hepatic α-SMA (0.19 ± 0.007-fold vs control; P < .0001) and col1a1 (0.29 ± 0.17-fold vs control; P < .0001) gene expression (Figure 2E). Serum albumin level was higher in treated mice than in untreated controls (4.06 ± 0.37 vs 3.14 ± 0.39; P < .01) (Figure 2F). There also were increases in hepatic oval cell numbers (Figure 2G).
Antifibrotic Effect of KSL Cells Is Associated With Enhancement of Endogenous Repair Mechanisms
The fate of injected cells was investigated, but donor-derived CD45.2+ cells could not be detected in significant numbers within the liver 7 days after injection. Quantification of cell populations within the liver showed a 219% increase in neutrophils (12.4 ± 2.7 vs 5.646 ± 2.51 Ly6G+ cells per field of view; P < .0001) and a 177% increase in macrophages (44.2 ± 11.8 vs 24.99 ± 7.5 F4/80+ cells per field of view; P < .0001) after KSL injections (Figure 3A and B). The absence of CD45.2 staining indicated that these increases were caused by increases in endogenous cell populations rather than differentiation of injected KSL. Although there were increases in matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)9- and MMP13-expressing cells (Figure 3C), and a reduction in the Arg-1/iNos ratio (Figure 3C), in the livers of mice receiving KSL infusions there were no differences in macrophage subsets within the liver (Figure 3E) or blood (Supplementary Figure 3A–C) after KSL cell infusion. The ratio of Ly-6Chi/Ly-6Clo (M1-like to M2-like) macrophages was not different between the control (0.23) and KSL groups (0.12). Murine monocytes migrated toward HPC-7 cells in a dose-dependent fashion and at similar levels to chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 2 (Figure 3F), a classic monocyte chemoattractant. This migration was chemokine dependent, as shown by blockade seen after pertussis toxin administration (Figure 3G). Notably, the majority of this reduction was achieved when a CCR2-blocking antibody was used (Figure 3G).
Antifibrotic Effect of KSL Cells Occurs Irrespective of Their Myeloid Differentiation Potential
To explicitly establish whether antifibrotic effects of KSL were mediated through differentiation to macrophages, the effect of injecting committed myeloid or lymphoid progenitor cells was determined (Figure 4A). Common myeloid progenitors (CMPs) established myeloid colonies whereas common lymphoid progenitors (CLP) did not (Figure 4B). Repeated injections of either progenitor population resulted in reduced hepatic fibrosis (Figure 4C and D), including a reduction in PSR staining (CMP, 1.94% ± 0.29%; CLP, 2.27% ± 0.13%; vs control, 4.38% ± 0.27% staining; P < .01 both vs control) (Figure 4C) and a reduction in α-SMA staining (CMP, 2.79% ± 0.25%; CLP, 3.69% ± 0.33%; vs control 7.05% ± 0.39% staining; P < .05 both vs control) (Figure 4D). This antifibrotic effect was similar to that observed with injections of KSL and confirmed that myeloid differentiation was not required to mediate this effect. As with KSL cells, infusions of CMP and CLP cells also were associated with histologic evidence of increased numbers of endogenous Ly6G neutrophils and F4/80 macrophages (Figure 4F and G) in the liver.
Hepatic Sphingosine-1-Phosphate Expression and Activity Increases in Rodent and Clinical Liver Injury
Because S1P, mediated by differences in concentration gradients, regulates the homeostatic trafficking of HSCs between tissue compartments, we determined changes in liver injury. In CCl4 injury S1P levels were 1.7-fold higher in the liver (68.79 ± 7.42 vs 39.45 ± 7.06 pmol per mg protein; P < .05) and 1.5-fold higher in the serum (1.71 ± 0.13 vs 1.15 ± 0.18 μmol/L; P < .01) with no significant change in BM or lymph concentrations (Figure 5A). To determine the factors influencing S1P levels we studied its cognate metabolizing enzymes. SphK1 phosphorylates sphingosine to produce S1P, and hepatic gene expression of SphK1 was up-regulated during murine CCl4 liver injury (5.57 ± 0.65-fold vs control; P < .0001), whereas expression of sphingosine kinase 2, SGPL, and SGPP remained unchanged (Figure 5B). Similar findings were observed in human chronic liver disease (Figure 5C). SphK1 up-regulation was not seen outside the murine liver (Supplementary Figure 4) and also was observed in mice fed the methionine-choline–deficient diet, an alternative model of chronic liver injury (Figure 5B). Analysis of isolated murine cell types showed significant up-regulation of SphK1 gene expression in liver sinusoidal endothelial cells during liver injury (5.26 ± 1.26-fold vs control; P < .001) without significant alteration in hepatocyte or peripheral blood mononuclear cell gene expression (Figure 5D). SphK1 expression was 12-fold higher in human subjects with chronic liver disease than in normal controls (12.55 ± 6.1-fold vs control; P < .01) (Figure 5C), and this observation held true for different etiologies of liver disease (Supplementary Figure 5). SphK1 was the most abundant enzyme in hepatic sinusoidal endothelial cells and peripheral blood mononuclear cells, whereas hepatocytes predominantly expressed SGPL and SGPP (Figure 5E). Increased SphK1 was detected by Western blot (Figure 5F) in both murine and human chronic liver injury, and SphK1 enzymatic activity was 2.7-fold higher (5.76 ± 0.95 vs 2.07 ± 0.25 nmol/min/mg protein; P < .01) (Figure 5G) in liver tissue from mice with CCl4 injury. SphK1 enzymatic activity also was increased in chronically diseased human liver tissue (Figure 5H).
Blocking Migration to S1P with FTY720 Specifically Increases Retention of KSL Cells in the Injured Liver
S1P1 was the most highly expressed S1P receptor on KSL, which was found predominantly intracellularly (Supplementary Figure 6A and B). In vitro migration to S1P was dose-dependent and peaked at 1 μmol/L (Supplementary Figure 6C).The HPC-7 cell line had similar c-kit/sca-1 expression (with absence of lineage markers), comparable S1P/chemokine receptor expression (Supplementary Figure 7), and migrated to S1P in vitro (Supplementary Figure 8E). Treatment of KSL with FTY720 markedly impaired S1P-dependent cell migration (Supplementary Figure 6D), as did treatment with the S1P1-specific antagonist W146. After administration of FTY720 to mice with CCl4 injury, higher numbers of KSL were isolated from liver (1697 ± 247 vs 982 ± 110 KSL cells/liver; P < .05), whereas the number of circulating KSL in peripheral blood was not altered (0.36 ± 0.1 vs 0.43 ± 0.14 KSL cells/μL) (Supplementary Figure 6E). 1,1′-dioctadecyl-3,3,3′,3′-tetramethylindotricarbocyanine iodide (DiR) labeling of KSL did not affect their viability or proliferation and fluorescence intensity of labeled cells was maintained at 7 days without transfer of dye to unlabeled cells (Supplementary Figure 9). DiR-labeled HPC-7 cells were used to study the tissue distribution of injected HSCs, which showed rapid clearance from the lungs over the first 24–48 hours and ongoing accumulation within the liver over 48 hours followed by gradual clearance (Figure 6A–C). Only low levels of uptake were found in the spleen and kidneys. Administration of FTY720 did not alter initial localization of injected cells in either the liver or lungs, however, the numbers of HPC-7 remaining within the liver were 50% higher than control 4 days after injection and were 86% at 7 days (Figure 6A–C). Based on these findings, tissue localization of KSL cells was studied at a single time point, 4 days after injection. Greater numbers of injected KSL cells were found within the liver in mice treated with FTY720 compared with untreated controls (13,514 ± 1506 vs 7687 ± 1556 DiR-labeled KSL cells/liver; P < .05) (Figure 6D). Intravital microscopy studies showed that treatment of KSL cells with FTY720 or W146 did not increase their recruitment to the injured liver (control, 10.3 ± 0.6; FTY720, 9.6 ± 2.4; W146, 9.0 ± 1.15 cells/field of view) 60 minutes after injection (Figure 6E and F).
Increased Retention of KSL Cells in the Injured Liver With FTY720 Enhances Their Antifibrotic Effect
Administration of FTY720 alone did not alter hepatic fibrosis or α-SMA activation (Supplementary Figure 10). Administration of FTY720 in conjunction with repeated KSL cell injections resulted in a further 16% reduction in PSR staining (1.86% ± 0.10% vs 2.21% ± 0.11% staining; P < .05) (Figure 7A and B) and a 12% reduction in hepatic hydroxyproline content (289.2 ± 90.9 vs 328.9 ± 83.6; P = .05) (Figure 7C) compared with KSL cell injection alone. α-SMA staining was 21% lower (1.82 ± 0.19 vs 2.31 ± 0.22; P < .05) (Figure 7D) in the FTY + KSL group and hepatic gene expression of α-SMA and Col1a1 remained suppressed in both groups (Figure 7E).
Conclusions
Despite the considerable interest in bone marrow cell therapy for liver disease there is still significant uncertainty regarding their efficacy. Moreover, there is also a lack of clarity as to which population of bone marrow cells is likely to be the most effective. In this article we show that repeated injections of a purified population of murine hematopoietic stem cells result in a marked resolution of hepatic fibrosis, in association with an increase in hepatic populations of endogenous macrophages and neutrophils. In addition, we show that abrogation of the migration of hematopoietic stem cells down an S1P gradient results in their greater hepatic retention and a further reduction in liver fibrosis, thus establishing a new therapeutic paradigm for the use of hematopoietic stem cells in this setting.
It previously has been proposed that injected bone marrow cells differentiate into antifibrotic cells of a monocyte/macrophage lineage.11 However, we have shown that myeloid differentiation is not required for cells to exert their antifibrotic effect in our study because injection of lymphoid progenitor cells induced a similar amount of fibrosis resolution as injections of either myeloid progenitors or HSCs. Neutrophils and macrophages, with expression of MMP9 and MMP13, are critical to the resolution of fibrosis27, 28 and significant increases in these cell populations were observed in the livers of mice receiving cell injections. The experimental design of this study, using a CD45 mismatch, confirmed that these cells were recipient-derived, representing activation of endogenous repair pathways rather than a direct antifibrotic action of the injected cells. These findings clarify that HSCs exert a paracrine effect within the injured liver, stimulating repair through recruitment of other cell populations, and indeed HSCs have been shown to be potent secretory cells, mediating effector properties through cytokine stimulation of immune cell populations.29 Further study of the chemokines and cytokines (eg, CCL2, interleukin 10, tumor necrosis factor-like weak inducer of apoptosis [TWEAK]) secreted by HSCs may further define the mechanisms involved. Notably, our data indicate that murine monocytes, which may mediate the antifibrotic effect of HSCs, are recruited to CCL2 and also to murine HPC-7 cells in a CCR2-dependent manner, suggesting that a potential mechanism by which monocytes are recruited/positioned within the injured liver relates to hematopoietic stem cell–expressed/secreted chemokine ligands. There were no differences in the proportion of macrophage subsets within the liver, or as a ratio of Ly-6Chi/Ly-6Clo (M1-like to M2-like) macrophages, after KSL cell infusion. Similarly, no differences were seen in peripheral blood analysis. As recognized by the literature, surface marker expression of macrophages is likely to be more complex and dynamic and thus even extensive panels do not completely characterize the full phenotype of macrophages in vivo.30 The integral role of macrophages in mediating both the generation and resolution of fibrosis has been shown by other groups, including our previous work.31, 32
It is assumed that homing of HSCs to the injured liver is required for them to exert their antifibrotic actions, although this has not been proven. Increased recruitment of hematopoietic stem cells to the liver has been reported in response to stress-induced signals, such as increased expression of stromal-derived factor-1, MMP9, and hepatocyte growth factor, which recruit human CD34+ progenitors.33 We previously reported that the adhesion of human hematopoietic (CD34+) stem cells to human liver compartments is integrin- and CD44-dependent and modulated by CXC chemokine receptor 3 and CXC chemokine receptor 4.34 Our BM transplantation studies confirmed that liver injury with CCl4 increases the number of BM-derived HSCs in the liver, but without any change in the number of HSCs in other organs. There have been a variety of different approaches taken to the administration of stem cell therapy in both human beings and animal models, the peripheral venous route represents the safest and most feasible mode of delivery and we have shown this to be effective because cells injected into a peripheral vein exert a beneficial therapeutic effect. Analysis of the distribution of injected HSCs showed their accumulation within the lungs immediately after injection followed by a rapid clearance, whereas recruitment to the liver increased over the first 48 hours with a more gradual reduction in cell numbers subsequently. Seven days after injection the number of injected HSCs remaining within the liver was very small and explains the absence of detectable numbers of cells on tissue section analysis. The whole-organ analysis in this study provided an accurate assessment of cell numbers because previous studies have used tissue section analysis, which may not quantify small numbers of cells accurately or provide appropriate comparisons between organs, for example, overestimating the number of injected cells within the lungs.
S1P has been recognized to mediate recirculation of HSCs down S1P gradients from tissue back into lymph and the circulation,20 and we show that S1P levels and activity are increased in the injured liver, thus partially reversing the normal S1P liver tissue:lymph gradient. Our data suggest that the increase in hepatic S1P levels is caused by up-regulation of SphK1 in liver sinusoidal endothelial cells with less significant changes in other enzymes involved in S1P processing. To establish whether S1P was acting to increase recruitment of bone marrow–derived cells to the liver, we performed intravital microscopy (Figure 6E and F) with blockade of the S1P axis using either a function-blocking antibody to S1P1 receptor or FTY720, neither of which altered the number of exogenously administered bone marrow–derived cells seen within the liver over a 60-minute period. We therefore hypothesize that the increased hepatic S1P levels act primarily to retain HSCs within the liver by preventing their egress down the existing S1P liver–lymph gradient rather than priming the liver to recruit bone marrow–derived cells, which is in keeping with the observations of others in normal physiological conditions.20, 35
To exploit this modulation of the S1P pathway we used pharmacologic manipulation with the partial S1P1-receptor agonist, FTY720. FTY720 impaired the migration of HSCs in vitro and when administered to mice with liver injury resulted in accumulation of HSCs within the liver. Although FTY720 did not affect trafficking of HSCs within the first 48 hours after injection, increased numbers of injected HSCs were present in mouse livers at later time points compared with placebo controls. This supports our observations that HSC recruitment to the injured liver is not mediated through S1P receptors and that the increased number of HSCs in the liver is a result of increased retention of HSCs within the liver, rendered unresponsive to the S1P gradient by FTY720. The use of isolated KSL cells in these tracking studies was limited by the difficulties isolating the large number of cells required, and thus the findings from experiments using the HPC-7 cell line were used to design experiments with isolated KSL cells at a single time point. This study, with KSL cells, also confirmed that mice receiving FTY720 had a greater number of cells within the liver 4 days after infusion.
Although administration of FTY theoretically could reduce homing to any organ, our tracking data (Figure 6B and C) indicated no change in the number of KSL cells found in the lungs. We therefore believe that the reason FTY720 increases the number of KSL cells in the liver, without an effect on other organs, is the result of a combination of a reduced liver–lymphatic S1P gradient (caused by the induction of liver injury, which increases hepatic S1P levels) and a reduced tendency to migrate down an S1P axis owing to the pharmacologic action of FTY720. Notably, FTY720 has a range of systemic actions that in their own right may be antifibrotic, such as inhibiting cytosolic phospholipase A2 and antagonizing cannabinoid receptor 1,36 although in this study it had no antifibrotic effect when used in isolation. The antifibrotic effect of injected HSCs was augmented by approximately 20% with the addition of FTY720, and although the clinical significance merits further study, any optimization of the effect of this very rare population of cells should be considered advantageous. The optimal number of cells required to achieve an antifibrotic effect remains uncertain; in our studies we chose to administer lower numbers of cells than in previous studies and it is not clear whether the number of cells administered was proportional to the antifibrotic effect or whether there is a plateau effect beyond which no greater effect would be observed.
Our data show the potent antifibrotic actions of purified murine hematopoietic stem cells, and also indicate that enhanced exposure of the target organ, the injured liver, to infused HSCs is associated with an augmentation of their antifibrotic effect. These findings support the development of clinical trials of stem cell therapy in human beings.
Footnotes
Conflicts of interest The authors disclose no conflicts.
Funding This work was funded by the Medical Research Council (Clinical Training Fellowship to A.K.), and the National Institute of Health Research Birmingham Liver Biomedical Research Unit (P.N.N.). The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the National Health Service, National Institute for Health Research, or the Department of Health.
Note: To access the supplementary material accompanying this article, visit the online version of Gastroenterology at www.gastrojournal.org, and at http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2017.03.022.
Contributor Information
Andrew King, Email: andyking@doctors.org.uk.
Philip N. Newsome, Email: P.N.Newsome@bham.ac.uk.
Supplementary Materials and Methods
Tissue Preparation
Blood samples were obtained by cardiac puncture under general anesthesia and mice were killed by cervical dislocation. Bone marrow cells were flushed from the medullary cavities of the femur and tibia with Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium + 10% fetal calf serum using a 25G needle. A single-cell suspension was prepared by passing the cells through a 40-um filter (BD Falcon, London, UK) and analyzed by flow cytometry or used for cell sorting. Mouse tissues were harvested and perfused with phosphate-buffered saline, dissociated, and digested with 2 mg/mL collagenase IV (Sigma). Mononuclear cells were isolated by density centrifugation using an Optiprep (Sigma) gradient and the resulting cell suspension was used for flow cytometry. Samples of frozen human liver tissue were obtained from patients at the University Hospital Birmingham with chronic liver disease undergoing liver transplantation or from normal organ donor liver not used for transplantation with written informed consent and local ethics committee approval.
Immunohistochemistry
Liver specimens were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, embedded in paraffin, and cut into 4-μm sections. Slides were deparaffinized and antigen retrieval was performed using a citrate buffer pH 6.0. Primary antibody was added for 1 hour: anti–α-SMA (1:400; Abcam), anti-F4/80 (1:200; AbD Serotec), anti-Ly6G (1:500; AbD Serotec), anti-CD45.2 (1:200; eBioscience) followed by secondary antibody (ImmPRESSS peroxidase anti-rabbit IgG or anti-rat [mouse adsorbed] IgG; Vector Labs), and expression was visualized using ImmPACT DAB reagent (Vector Labs). Sections were counterstained with hematoxylin and mounted using DPX (Fisher Scientific).
Hydroxyproline Assay
Frozen liver tissue samples were weighed and protein was precipitated by the addition of 1:1 trichloroacetic acid:water and incubated on ice for 30 minutes. Samples were hydrolyzed with 6 N HCl in sealed borosilicate tubes and incubated at 120°C for 16 hours and at 80°C until completely desiccated. The precipitate was resuspended in water and filtered. Chloramine T solution was added at room temperature for 20 minutes, followed by the addition of Ehrlich’s solution and incubation at 65°C in a water bath for 15 minutes. After cooling to room temperature, fluorescence readings at 561 nm were taken from samples and standards, and hydroxyproline content was expressed as mcg per gram of liver tissue.
Flow Cytometry and Cell Sorting
Erythrocytes were lysed using ACK red cell lysis buffer (Sigma). After incubation with anti-CD16/32 antibody (1:20; eBioscience) to eliminate nonspecific fragment crystallizable receptor binding, cell suspensions were labeled with the relevant primary antibodies (all 1:100): anti-CD11b–fluorescein isothiocyanate (M1/70), anti-CD5–fluorescein isothiocyanate (53-7.3), anti-CD8a–fluorescein isothiocyanate (53-6.7), anti-Ter119–fluorescein isothiocyanate (TER119), anti-CD45R–fluorescein isothiocyanate (RA3-6B2), anti-Gr1–fluorescein isothiocyanate (RB6-8C5), anti-CD117 (c-kit)–PE, anti-CD117 (c-kit)-Pacific Blue, anti-CD117 (c-kit)-APC-Cy7 (all 2B8), anti-Sca1–APC (D7), anti-CD127 (interleukin 7Ra)-PE (A7R34), anti-EDG1 (S1P1)-PE (T4-H28), anti-CD45.1-PE (A20), anti-CD45.2-APC (104) and incubated on ice for 30 minutes. Nonviable cells were excluded using LIVE/DEAD stain (Invitrogen). Absolute cell counts were determined using Trucount beads (Invitrogen) and data were analyzed using a CyAn adenosine diphosphate flow cytometer with Summit (London, UK) 4.3 software. Cell sorting was performed using a MoFloCell Sorter (Dako, London, UK) with Summit 5.2 software. Cells to be injected were sorted directly into sterile phosphate-buffered saline and used immediately, whereas cells for polymerase chain reaction analysis were sorted directly into RNeasy Lysis buffer ready for RNA extraction.
Cell Isolation From Blood and Liver and Flow Cytometric Analysis
Blood was collected through cardiac puncture into EDTA tubes. Red blood cells were lysed with 5 minutes of lysis buffer. Isolated cells then were washed twice and resuspended in magnetic-activated cell sorting (MACS) buffer (2% fetal calf serum and 1 mmol/L EDTA). Liver homogenate was filtered after being homogenized with a 5-mL syringe plunger. Single cells then were overlaid on density gradient of Optiprep and centrifuged at 1000g for 25 minutes at room temperature. After 2 washes, isolated cells then were suspended in MACS buffer.
Antibodies used for flow cytometry are listed in Supplementary Table 1. Single-cell suspensions were blocked with anti-mouse fragment crystallizable region (FcR) antibody (CD16/CD32) for 15 minutes at 4°C in MACS buffer, and stained with primary conjugated antibodies. For internal staining, cells were fixed and permeabilized with a Foxp3/permeabilization kit (eBioscience). Flow cytometry was performed with Fortessa (BD Biosciences) with forward- and side-scatter gates set to exclude nonviable cells. Data were analyzed with Flowjo software (version 10.1).
Flow cytometric analysis showed liver macrophages (gated CD45+CD3-CD11b+F4/80+Ly-6G-), resident (res)macrophages (gated CD45+CD3-CD11bintF4/80+), M1-macrophages (gated CD45+CD3-CD11b+F4/80+Ly-6G-Ly6Chi), and M2-macrophages (gated CD45+CD3-CD11b+F4/80+Ly-6G-Ly6-Clo).
Quantitative Reverse-Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction
RNA extraction was performed using the RNeasy Mini (liver tissue) and Micro (isolated cells) kits (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s instruction, concentration and purity were checked using a Nanodrop 1000 (Thermo Scientific). Complementary DNA was transcribed from RNA using iScript reverse-transcriptase (Bio-Rad). Reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction was performed on an ABI Prism 7900HT or Stratagene MX3000p using TaqMan assay mix in predesigned TaqMan assays as detailed in the Supplementary information (Applied Biosystems). The program consisted of activation at 95°C for 10 minutes, followed by 40 cycles of denaturing (95°C for 10 seconds) and annealing (60°C for 60 seconds) with fluorescence detection at the end of each cycle. Normalization to glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase using the 2-ΔΔCT method was performed and expression relative to the appropriate control was calculated.
Serum Albumin
Serum albumin concentrations were determined using the Quantichrom BCG Albumin Assay (Bioassay Systems) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Western Blot
Whole-liver protein extracts were quantified using Bradford reagent and 50 μg used for Western blot. The primary antibody was either anti-SphK1 (1:500; Abcam) or anti–glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (1:2000; Sigma) incubated overnight and horseradish-peroxidase–conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG antibody (1:10,000; Sigma) secondary antibody incubated for 30 minutes. Pierce chemiluminescent peroxidase substrate and Hyperfilm ECL were used to visualize protein expression.
Transwell Migration
Male C57/BL6 mice were culled by cervical dislocation and their tibias and femurs were dissected from the cadavers for monocyte isolation. Ends of bones were trimmed and the bone marrow was flushed out with MACS separation (MACs) buffer (phosphate-buffered saline + 2 mmol/L EDTA + 0.5% bovine serum albumin). After centrifugation and cell count, monocytes were selected from the cell suspension using magnetic labeling and separation. After washing, the cells were resuspended in MACs buffer and incubated for 5 minutes at 4°C with FcR Blocking Reagent and Monocyte Biotin-Antibody cocktail. The cells then were washed before being incubated with Anti-Biotin Microbeads for 10 minutes at 4°C and then passed through an LS column. The unlabeled cells represented the monocyte population and passed through the column. Monocytes then were incubated with cell tracker green for 20 minutes at room temperature (the cell tracker green was diluted 1:1000 to provide a concentration of 5 μmol/L). CCL2 was prepared in migration media (Roswell Park Memorial Institute + 1% PSG + 0.1% bovine serum albumin) to a concentration of 100 ng/mL, and 150 μL of this added to the receiver plate along with media alone, unstained monocytes, and HPC-7 cells. Monocytes were washed and resuspended in migration media to generate a density of 2 × 105 cells/50 μL. A total of 50 μL of stained monocytes then were added to the Transwell insert and the plate was incubated for 4 hours at 37°C. After this incubation, samples were collected from the receiver plate and placed into separate fluorescence-activated cell sorter tubes. Cells then were washed, resuspended in MACs buffer, and quantified flow cytometrically.
Near-Infrared Fluorescence Imaging
DiR (Invitrogen) was dissolved in methanol (1 mg/mL) and stored in the dark. A total of 5 μL/mL of DiR stock solution was added to cells at 1 × 106/mL in complete StemPro media (London, UK) and incubated in the dark for 30 minutes at 37° C. Cells were washed and resuspended in 100–200 μL sterile phosphate-buffered saline for re-injection.
Near-infrared imaging was performed using the IVIS Spectrum Imaging System (autoexposure; medium binning; excitation wavelength, 745 nm; emission wavelength, 800 nm). Fluorescence of individual organs was determined by Living Image Software (Perkin Elmer) using region-of-interest analysis after subtraction of background and expressed as radiance efficiency (calculated as follows: radiance of subject/illumination intensity) to eliminate variability in the excitation light across the field of view.
Intravital Microscopy
C57BL6 mice with 8 weeks of CCl4 liver injury underwent ketamine/xylazine anesthesia and carotid artery cannulation. Laparotomy was performed and the liver was exteriorized and placed on the stage of an Olympus IX81 inverted microscope. One 10× power field of view was selected for imaging. HPC-7 cells were labeled with 5 μmol/L CFSE and injected, 1-minute video recordings of the selected field of view were taken every 5 minutes until 60 minutes and analyzed for adhesion (stationary >30 seconds) of labeled cells using Slidebook software (Intelligent Imaging Innovations, London, UK).
Supplementary Table 1.
Antibodies |
Clone |
Conjugate |
Source |
---|---|---|---|
Live/dead | APC-CY7 e780 | Life Technology | |
CD45.2 | 104 | eFluor 506 | Ebio |
Foxp3 | FJK-16s | APC | Ebio |
CD3 | 17A2 | eFluor 450 | Ebio |
CD4 | GK1.5 | FITC | Ebio |
NkP46 | 29A1.4 | PE | Ebio |
CD8 | 53-6.7 | BV 786 | Biolegend |
LY6C | HK1.4 | PE | Ebio |
LY-6G/Gr-1 | 1A8-Ly6g | APC | Ebio |
CD3 | 17A2 | BV650 | Biolegend |
B220 | Ra3-6B2 | eFluor 450 | Ebio |
CD11b | M1/70 | PE-e610 | Ebio |
F4/80 | BM8 | PE-CY7 | Ebio |
CD45.2 | 104 | FITC | Ebio |
CD16 | 93 | Purified | Ebio |
FITC, fluorescein isothiocyanate.
References
- 1.Leon D.A., McCambridge J. Liver cirrhosis mortality rates in Britain from 1950 to 2002: an analysis of routine data. Lancet. 2006;367:52–56. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)67924-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.D'Amico G., Garcia-Tsao G., Pagliaro L. Natural history and prognostic indicators of survival in cirrhosis: a systematic review of 118 studies. J Hepatol. 2006;44:217–231. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2005.10.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Lucey M.R., Terrault N., Ojo L. Long-term management of the successful adult liver transplant: 2012 practice guideline by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the American Society of Transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2013;19:3–26. doi: 10.1002/lt.23566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Merion R.M., Schaubel D.E., Dykstra D.M. The survival benefit of liver transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2005;5:307–313. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2004.00703.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.NHSBT Liver Transplantation Activity Report (United Kingdom). 2012.
- 6.Iredale J.P., Benyon R.C., Pickering J. Mechanisms of spontaneous resolution of rat liver fibrosis. Hepatic stellate cell apoptosis and reduced hepatic expression of metalloproteinase inhibitors. J Clin Invest. 1998;102:538–549. doi: 10.1172/JCI1018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kisseleva T., Cong M., Paik Y. Myofibroblasts revert to an inactive phenotype during regression of liver fibrosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:9448–9453. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1201840109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Petersen B.E., Bowen W.C., Patrene K.D. Bone marrow as a potential source of hepatic oval cells. Science. 1999;284:1168–1170. doi: 10.1126/science.284.5417.1168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Theise N.D., Badve S., Saxena R. Derivation of hepatocytes from bone marrow cells in mice after radiation-induced myeloablation. Hepatology. 2000;31:235–240. doi: 10.1002/hep.510310135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lagasse E., Connors H., Al-Dhalimy M. Purified hematopoietic stem cells can differentiate into hepatocytes in vivo. Nat Med. 2000;6:1229–1234. doi: 10.1038/81326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Sakaida I., Terai S., Yamamoto N. Transplantation of bone marrow cells reduces CCl4-induced liver fibrosis in mice. Hepatology. 2004;40:1304–1311. doi: 10.1002/hep.20452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Yannaki E., Athanasiou E., Xagorari A. G-CSF-primed hematopoietic stem cells or G-CSF per se accelerate recovery and improve survival after liver injury, predominantly by promoting endogenous repair programs. Exp Hematol. 2005;33:108–119. doi: 10.1016/j.exphem.2004.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Quintanilha L.F., Mannheimer E.G., Carvalho A.B. Bone marrow cell transplant does not prevent or reverse murine liver cirrhosis. Cell Transplant. 2008;17:943–953. doi: 10.3727/096368908786576453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Thomas J.A., Pope C., Wojtacha D. Macrophage therapy for murine liver fibrosis recruits host effector cells improving fibrosis, regeneration, and function. Hepatology. 2011;53:2003–2015. doi: 10.1002/hep.24315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Houlihan D.D., Newsome P.N. Critical review of clinical trials of bone marrow stem cells in liver disease. Gastroenterology. 2008;135:438–450. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.05.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Moore J.K., Stutchfield B.M., Forbes S.J. Systematic review: the effects of autologous stem cell therapy for patients with liver disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2014;39:673–685. doi: 10.1111/apt.12645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.King A., Barton D., Beard H.A. REpeated AutoLogous Infusions of STem cells In Cirrhosis (REALISTIC): a multicentre, phase II, open-label, randomised controlled trial of repeated autologous infusions of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (GCSF) mobilised CD133+ bone marrow stem cells in patients with cirrhosis. A study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2015;5:e007700. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Siminovitch L., McCulloch E.A., Till J.E. The distribution of colony-forming cells among spleen colonies. J Cell Physiol. 1963;62:327–336. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1030620313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Wognum A.W., Eaves A.C., Thomas T.E. Identification and isolation of hematopoietic stem cells. Arch Med Res. 2003;34:461–475. doi: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2003.09.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Massberg S., Schaerli P., Knezevic-Maramica I. Immunosurveillance by hematopoietic progenitor cells trafficking through blood, lymph, and peripheral tissues. Cell. 2007;131:994–1008. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.09.047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Pappu R., Schwab S.R., Cornelissen I. Promotion of lymphocyte egress into blood and lymph by distinct sources of sphingosine-1-phosphate. Science. 2007;316:295–298. doi: 10.1126/science.1139221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Olivera A., Allende M.L., Proia R.L. Shaping the landscape: metabolic regulation of S1P gradients. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2013;1831:193–202. doi: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2012.06.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Oo M.L., Thangada S., Wu M.T. Immunosuppressive and anti-angiogenic sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor-1 agonists induce ubiquitinylation and proteasomal degradation of the receptor. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:9082–9089. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M610318200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Volpe G., Walton D.S., Del Pozzo W. C/EBPalpha and MYB regulate FLT3 expression in AML. Leukemia. 2013;27:1487–1496. doi: 10.1038/leu.2013.23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kavanagh D.P., Durant L.E., Crosby H.A. Haematopoietic stem cell recruitment to injured murine liver sinusoids depends on (alpha)4(beta)1 integrin/VCAM-1 interactions. Gut. 2010;59:79–87. doi: 10.1136/gut.2008.168054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Taniguchi H., Toyoshima T., Fukao K., Nakauchi H. Presence of hematopoietic stem cells in the adult liver. Nat Med. 1996 Feb;2(2):198–203. doi: 10.1038/nm0296-198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Harty M.W., Papa E.F., Huddleston H.M. Hepatic macrophages promote the neutrophil-dependent resolution of fibrosis in repairing cholestatic rat livers. Surgery. 2008;143:667–678. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2008.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Fallowfield J.A., Mizuno M., Kendall T.J. Scar-associated macrophages are a major source of hepatic matrix metalloproteinase-13 and facilitate the resolution of murine hepatic fibrosis. J Immunol. 2007;178:5288–5295. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.178.8.5288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Granick J.L., Simon S.I., Borjesson D.L. Hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells as effectors in innate immunity. Bone Marrow Res. 2012;2012:165107. doi: 10.1155/2012/165107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Ju C., Tacke F. Hepatic macrophages in homeostasis and liver diseases: from pathogenesis to novel therapeutic strategies. Cell Mol Immunol. 2016;13:316–327. doi: 10.1038/cmi.2015.104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Duffield J.S., Forbes S.J., Constandinou C.M. Selective depletion of macrophages reveals distinct, opposing roles during liver injury and repair. J Clin Invest. 2005;115:56–65. doi: 10.1172/JCI22675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Ramachandran P., Pellicoro A., Vernon M.A. Differential Ly-6C expression identifies the recruited macrophage phenotype, which orchestrates the regression of murine liver fibrosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:E3186–E3195. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1119964109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kollet O., Shivtiel S., Chen Y.Q. HGF, SDF-1, and MMP-9 are involved in stress-induced human CD34+ stem cell recruitment to the liver. J Clin Invest. 2003;112:160–169. doi: 10.1172/JCI17902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Crosby H.A., Lalor P.F., Ross E. Adhesion of human haematopoietic (CD34+) stem cells to human liver compartments is integrin and CD44 dependent and modulated by CXCR3 and CXCR4. J Hepatol. 2009;51:734–749. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2009.06.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Juarez J.G., Harun N., Thien M. Sphingosine-1-phosphate facilitates trafficking of hematopoietic stem cells and their mobilization by CXCR4 antagonists in mice. Blood. 2012;119:707–716. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-04-348904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Paugh S.W., Cassidy M.P., He H. Sphingosine and its analog, the immunosuppressant 2-amino-2-(2-[4-octylphenyl]ethyl)-1,3-propanediol, interact with the CB1 cannabinoid receptor. Mol Pharmacol. 2006;70:41–50. doi: 10.1124/mol.105.020552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]