Significance
Pathogens cause disease by deploying virulence effectors that interfere with various host targets, whereas plants counteract pathogen virulence when invoking a potent immunity known as effector-triggered immunity (ETI). Little is known about the mechanism underlying this molecular battle between plant immunity and pathogen virulence. We find that the phytohormones abscisic acid and jasmonate (JA), the signaling pathways of which are often exploited by pathogens, transcriptionally activate a common family of protein phosphatases that suppress immune-associated MAP kinases. We demonstrate that a bacterial pathogen exploits the JA-mediated suppression of MAP kinases by using a JA-mimic, whereas ETI blocks JA signaling to counteract this bacterial virulence. Our results highlight suppression and protection of MAP kinases as a molecular battle between pathogens and plants.
Keywords: MAPK phosphatase, abscisic acid, jasmonate, coronatine, effector-triggered immunity
Abstract
Phytopathogens promote virulence by, for example, exploiting signaling pathways mediated by phytohormones such as abscisic acid (ABA) and jasmonate (JA). Some plants can counteract pathogen virulence by invoking a potent form of immunity called effector-triggered immunity (ETI). Here, we report that ABA and JA mediate inactivation of the immune-associated MAP kinases (MAPKs), MPK3 and MPK6, in Arabidopsis thaliana. ABA induced expression of genes encoding the protein phosphatases 2C (PP2Cs), HAI1, HAI2, and HAI3 through ABF/AREB transcription factors. These three HAI PP2Cs interacted with MPK3 and MPK6 and were required for ABA-mediated MPK3/MPK6 inactivation and immune suppression. The bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato (Pto) DC3000 activates ABA signaling and produces a JA-mimicking phytotoxin, coronatine (COR), that promotes virulence. We found that Pto DC3000 induces HAI1 through COR-mediated activation of MYC2, a master transcription factor in JA signaling. HAI1 dephosphorylated MPK3 and MPK6 in vitro and was necessary for COR-mediated suppression of MPK3/MPK6 activation and immunity. Intriguingly, upon ETI activation, A. thaliana plants overcame the HAI1-dependent virulence of COR by blocking JA signaling. Finally, we showed conservation of induction of HAI PP2Cs by ABA and JA in other Brassicaceae species. Taken together, these results suggest that ABA and JA signaling pathways, which are hijacked by the bacterial pathogen, converge on the HAI PP2Cs that suppress activation of the immune-associated MAPKs. Also, our data unveil interception of JA-signaling activation as a host counterstrategy against the bacterial suppression of MAPKs during ETI.
Plants have an innate immune system consisting of pattern-triggered immunity (PTI) and effector-triggered immunity (ETI) that restricts microbial invasions (1, 2). In PTI, cell-surface–localized pattern recognition receptors detect conserved microbial molecules, termed microbe-associated molecular patterns (MAMPs), leading to a diverse array of immune responses such as a burst of reactive oxygen species, cellular Ca2+ spikes, activation of MAP kinases (MAPKs), and production of phytohormones (2, 3). Signaling pathways mediated by these immune components form intricate networks that orchestrate defense reactions (2, 4). Pathogens deliver virulence effectors into the plant cell that interfere with immune signaling components, resulting in PTI suppression (5). Recognition of specific effectors by intracellular nucleotide-binding/leucine-rich repeat (NLR) receptors activates ETI, which counteracts pathogen virulence and restricts pathogen growth (6).
The highly interconnected network structure of plant immune signaling pathways provides versatile immune regulation, but is sometimes exploited by pathogens. For example, various strains of the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae, including the model strain P. syringae pv. tomato (Pto) DC3000, produce the phytotoxin coronatine (COR) that activates jasmonate (JA) signaling and promotes virulence (7–9). COR is a structural mimic of the biologically active form of JA, (+)-7-iso-jasmonoyl-l-Ile (JA-Ile). Perception of COR or JA-Ile by COI1 triggers proteasome-dependent degradation of JAZ proteins. This releases JAZ-mediated repression of transcription factors, including the master transcription factor MYC2 and its homologs MYC3 and MYC4 (10). Activation of MYC2 by COR contributes to its virulence function of antagonizing salicylic acid (SA)-mediated immunity against P. syringae by transcriptionally activating the NAC transcription factors ANAC019, ANAC055, and ANAC072, which repress the SA biosynthesis gene SID2 and induce the SA catabolism gene BSMT1 (8). However, COR appears to have another virulence mechanism(s) in addition to SA suppression (8).
The phytohormone abscisic acid (ABA) plays a pivotal role in abiotic stress responses (11). ABA signaling is repressed by clade A protein phosphatases 2C (PP2Cs), which inhibit SNF1-related kinases 2 (SnRK2s) via dephosphorylation. Upon perception, the PYR/PYL/RCAR ABA receptors bind to clade A PP2Cs to release inhibition of SnRK2s. This leads to SnRK2-mediated phosphorylation and activation of a group of AREB/ABF transcription factors, including AREB1, AREB2, and ABF3, thereby regulating genes containing ABA responsive elements (ABREs) in their promoters (12). Interestingly, Pto DC3000 activates ABA biosynthesis and signaling in infected tissues through the actions of proteinaceous effectors delivered by the type III secretion system (T3SS) and COR (13, 14). Activation of ABA signaling antagonizes SA-mediated immunity against the bacterial pathogen (15).
Upon activation by upstream MAPK kinases, MAPKs modulate functions of a number of substrates via phosphorylation, thereby regulating diverse biological processes including plant immunity (16). The Arabidopsis thaliana MAPKs, MPK3, and MPK6 are activated during PTI and ETI and regulate diverse immune responses (16).
Here, we report unprecedented interconnections between MAPK and ABA/JA signaling. ABA induces expression of the clade A PP2Cs HAI1, HAI2, and HAI3 through the AREB/ABF transcription factors. These HAI PP2Cs interact with MPK3 and MPK6 and are required for ABA-mediated MAPK inactivation and immune suppression. We found that Pto DC3000 induces HAI1 through COR-mediated activation of MYC2, inactivating MPK3/MPK6 and suppressing immunity. Interestingly, the COR-mediated HAI1 induction and immune suppression is counteracted upon ETI activation. Finally, we show that the transcriptional effects of ABA and JA on the HAI PP2Cs are conserved in other Brassicaceae species. Our results indicate that ABA- and JA-signaling pathways converge on the HAI PP2Cs, suppressing the immune-associated MAPKs in A. thaliana and possibly in other Brassicaceae species. Additionally, our results reveal that blocking JA signaling is a mechanism by which ETI counteracts the bacterial suppression of MAPKs.
Results
ABA Suppresses MAPK Activation.
The phosphorylation status of MPK3 and MPK6 changes dynamically during pathogen infection (16–19). In search of a regulator of MAPK activation during immunity, we found that an ABA-deficient mutant, aba2, shows enhanced activation of MPK3 and MPK6 after treatment with flg22, a bacterial MAMP (Fig. 1A). Conversely, exogenous ABA inhibited flg22-triggered MPK3/MPK6 activation (Fig. 1B). The protein levels of MPK3 and MPK6 did not explain the inhibitory effects of ABA on MPK3/MPK6 activation (Fig. 1 A and B), indicating that ABA affects the phosphorylation status of MAPKs. To explore the point of MAPK inactivation by ABA, we used the transgenic A. thaliana line expressing a constitutively active form of MKK4 (MKK4DD), which phosphorylates MPK3 and MPK6, under a dexamethasone (DEX)-inducible promoter (20). ABA strongly inhibited MPK3/MPK6 activation by MKK4DD without dramatic changes of protein levels of MKK4DD, MPK3, and MPK6 (Fig. 1C). Thus, ABA inhibits MPK3/MPK6 activation.
Fig. 1.
ABA suppresses MAPK activation. (A) Seedlings of Col and aba2 were treated with flg22 (1 μM) for the indicated time periods. (B) Seedlings of Col were pretreated with mock (0.1% EtOH) or ABA (10 μM) for 6 h, followed by flg22 treatment (1 μM) for the indicated time periods. (C) Leaves of 4- to 5-wk-old MKK4DD plants were infiltrated with dexamethasone (2 μM) together with mock (0.1% EtOH) or ABA (10 μM) and harvested at the indicated time points. Proteins were detected by immunoblotting using the indicated antibodies. Ponceau S-stained RuBisCo is shown as a loading control.
HAI PP2Cs Are Responsible for ABA-Mediated MAPK Inactivation and Immune Suppression.
The clade A PP2C ABI1 was shown to specifically inhibit MPK6 activation (21). However, this does not explain our observation that ABA suppresses activation of both MPK3 and MPK6. Among the clade A PP2Cs, HAI1, HAI2, and HAI3 play a distinctive role in ABA-regulated physiological responses (22). It was therefore proposed that the HAI PP2Cs may have as-yet-unidentified dephosphorylation substrates in addition to SnRK2s (22). Consistent with previous research (23), we found that ABA induces expression of all three HAIs (SI Appendix, Fig. S1A). Loss-of-function mutations in HAI1 HAI2 HAI3, but not those in HAI1 or ABI2 alone, compromised ABA-mediated MPK3/MPK6 inactivation at 10 min after flg22 treatment (Fig. 2A and SI Appendix, Fig. S1 B–D). We then tested whether HAI PP2Cs interact with MAPKs using bimolecular fluorescent complementation (BiFC) assays. Interactions of HAI1 or HAI2 with MAPKs were detected in the cytoplasm and nucleus, whereas interactions between HAI3 and MAPKs were observed exclusively in the nucleus (Fig. 2B). The sites of interactions were consistent with our and previous observations of the subcellular localization patterns of HAI PP2Cs and MAPKs (SI Appendix, Fig. S2 A–F) (24–26). Interaction of another PP2C phosphatase, ABI2, with MAPKs was not detected (Fig. 2B). Consistently, ABI2 was previously shown not to target MAPKs for dephosphorylation (27, 28). Immunoblot analysis confirmed the accumulation of MAPKs and PP2Cs (SI Appendix, Fig. S2 G and H). These results suggest that HAI PP2Cs interact with MPK3 and MPK6 and contribute redundantly to ABA-mediated MPK3/MPK6 inactivation.
Fig. 2.
HAI PP2Cs are responsible for ABA-mediated MAPK inactivation. (A) Seedlings of Col, hai1, and ha1 hai2 hai3 (hai1/2/3) were pretreated with ABA (10 μM) or mock for 6 h, followed by flg22 treatment (1 μM) for 10 min. Proteins were detected by immunoblotting using the indicated antibodies. Ponceau S-stained RuBisCo is shown as a loading control. (B) BiFC analysis of interactions between HAI PP2Cs and MAPKs. HAI PP2Cs fused to the N-terminal half of YFP and MAPKs fused to the C-terminal half of YFP were expressed in N. benthamiana by Agrobacterium infiltration. ABI2 was used as a negative control. The pictures were taken at 3 d after infiltration. (Scale bars: 50 μm.) (C) HAI1 dephosphorylates MPK3 and MPK6 in vitro. Recombinant MAPKs were phosphorylated by GST-MKK4DD. Phosphorylated MAPKs (500 ng) were mixed with GST or GST-HAI1 (2 μg) and incubated at 30 °C for 1 h. Proteins were detected by immunoblotting using the indicated antibodies.
To test whether HAI PP2Cs can directly dephosphorylate MAPKs, we produced recombinant HAI PP2Cs in Escherichia coli. As reported previously (24), the full-length HAI1 was insoluble, but the PP2C domain of HAI1 was soluble. HAI2 and HAI3 full-length proteins and PP2C domains could not be solubilized. Therefore, only the PP2C domain of HAI1 was purified as a GST fusion protein (GST-HAI1) and tested for its phosphatase activity toward MPK3 and MPK6 in vitro. Kinase-inactive His-tagged MPK3 and MPK6 (His-KIMPK3/MPK6) (29) were used to avoid MAPK autophosphorylation, which could disturb dephosphorylation assays. GST-HAI1 but not GST reduced the amounts of MPK3/MPK6 phosphorylated by MKK4DD (Fig. 2C). Thus, HAI1 directly dephosphorylates MPK3 and MPK6.
ABA has a negative impact on immunity against Pto DC3000 (13, 14). We found that exogenous ABA promotes Pto DC3000 growth in the wild type but not in hai1 hai2 hai3 (SI Appendix, Fig. S3A). The T3SS effector AvrPtoB increases ABA accumulation (14). Pto ΔAvrPtoΔAvrPtoB, which lacks AvrPtoB and its functionally redundant effector AvrPto (30), triggered stronger MAPK activation than Pto DC3000 during infection (SI Appendix, Fig. S3 C and D). Promotion of bacterial growth, mediated by AvrPto/AvrPtoB, was significantly reduced in hai1 hai2 hai3 and aba2 (SI Appendix, Fig. S3B). These results suggest that ABA-mediated MAPK inactivation through HAI PP2Cs may be one of the virulence functions of AvrPto/AvrPtoB.
Coronatine Suppresses MAPK Activation and Immunity Through HAI1.
We investigated if HAI1, HAI2, and HAI3 are induced during infection by Pto DC3000. As shown in Fig. 3A, HAI1 was highly induced at 6 h and 24 h post infiltration (hpi). Only a slight induction of HAI2 was detected at 24 hpi. No induction was observed for HAI3. Because all HAI PP2Cs are highly responsive to ABA within 1 h (SI Appendix, Fig. S1A), we speculated that a signal(s) other than ABA may be responsible for the predominant induction of HAI1 by Pto DC3000. To address this, we compared the promoter sequences of HAI PP2Cs, using the online tool Athena (31), and found a MYC2-binding motif (G box; CACGTG) in the promoter of HAI1 but not in those of HAI2 and HAI3 (Fig. 3D and SI Appendix, Fig. S12). This finding, together with the fact that MYC2 is a master transcription factor in JA signaling (32), led us to hypothesize that the JA-mimicking phytotoxin COR is involved in HAI1 induction by Pto DC3000. Indeed, HAI1 induction was not detected in the wild type infected with a COR-deficient Pto mutant (Pto DC3118) (33) or in a coi1 mutant infected with Pto DC3000 (Fig. 3B). Moreover, COR or methyl jasmonate (MeJA) treatment induced HAI1 but not HAI2 and HAI3 (SI Appendix, Fig. S4 A and C). The HAI1 induction by COR or MeJA was compromised similarly in myc2 and myc2 myc3 myc4 (Fig. 3C and SI Appendix, Fig. S4D). We then tested whether MYC2 directly binds to the G box in the HAI1 promoter in planta by chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) using a transgenic A. thaliana line expressing the MYC2-GFP fusion protein driven by the 35S promoter (34). The ratio of the immunoprecipitated DNAs from MYC2-GFP plants to those from the control YFP-HA or wild-type plants was determined by qPCR. After treatment with COR or MeJA, we found a significant enrichment of the promoter region surrounding the G-box motif, but not of a DNA segment in the coding sequence used as a negative control (Fig. 3D and SI Appendix, Fig. S4 B and E). Taken together, these results show that Pto DC3000 induces HAI1 through COR-mediated activation of MYC2.
Fig. 3.
Pto DC3000 induces HAI1 through coronatine-mediated activation of JA signaling. (A) Leaves of 4- to 5-wk-old Col plants were infiltrated with mock (water), Pto DC3000, Pto AvrRpt2, or Pto AvrRpm1 (OD600 = 0.001) and harvested at 6 h and 24 h after infiltration. (B) Leaves of 4- to 5-wk-old Col or coi1 plants were infiltrated with mock (water), Pto DC3000, or COR-deficient Pto DC3118 (OD600 = 0.001) and harvested at 6 h after infiltration (B). (A and B) The expression levels of HAI1, HAI2, and HAI3 were determined by RT-qPCR. Bars represent means and SEs of the log2 expression levels relative to Actin2 calculated from three independent experiments using mixed linear models. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences compared with mock at each time point (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01, two-tailed t tests). (C) Seedlings of Col, myc2, and myc2 myc3 myc4 (myc2/3/4) were treated with mock (DMSO) or COR (5 μM) for the indicated time periods. The expression level of HAI1 was determined by RT-qPCR. Bars represent means and SEs of the log2 expression levels relative to Actin2 calculated from two independent experiments using a mixed linear model. The Benjamini–Hochberg method was used to adjust P values for multiple hypothesis testing. Groups not sharing any letters show statistically significant differences (adjusted P < 0.05). (D) ChIP-qPCR was performed using the p35S::MYC2-GFP line. The G-box motif located 193 bp upstream of the transcription start site of HAI1 is shown by a tick. Bold gray horizontal lines show the regions amplified by different qPCR primers. Bars represent means and SEs of the fold enrichment relative to YFP-HA plants set to 1, calculated from two independent experiments. Asterisk indicates statistically significant differences from YFP-HA plants (*P < 0.01, two-tailed t tests).
MYC2 was originally identified as a transcription factor for ABA-regulated gene expression (35). We therefore tested whether MYC transcription factors also play a role in induction of HAI PP2Cs by ABA. No significant effects of myc2 or myc2 myc3 myc4 mutations were observed (SI Appendix, Fig. S5 A–C). In contrast, expression of the HAI PP2Cs was highly compromised in the areb1 areb2 abf3 triple mutant (SI Appendix, Fig. S5 A–C). Recently, a large-scale ChIP-seq analysis demonstrated binding of AREB2 and ABF3 to the promoters of HAI1, HAI2, and HAI3 (36). We also observed wild-type–like expression of HAI1 in the areb1 areb2 abf3 mutant after MeJA treatment (SI Appendix, Fig. S5D). Thus, ABA- and JA-signaling pathways converge onto HAI1 through AREBs and MYC2, respectively.
The ability of COR to induce HAI1 suggests the possibility that MAPKs are virulence targets of COR. To test this, flg22-triggered MAPK activation was monitored in wild-type and hai1 seedlings pretreated with COR or mock for 6 h. We observed faster MAPK inactivation in COR-treated wild-type seedlings (Fig. 4A and SI Appendix, Fig. S6). This effect of COR was much weaker in hai1 (Fig. 4A and SI Appendix, Fig. S6). We then monitored MAPK activation over time in the wild type or hai1 infected with Pto DC3000 or COR-deficient Pto DC3118. Faster activation of MPK3 and MPK6 was seen in hai1 compared with the wild type during Pto DC3000 infection (SI Appendix, Fig. S7A) and during infection by Pto DC3118 compared with Pto DC3000 in the wild type (SI Appendix, Fig. S7B). Based on these data and the ability of HAI1 to dephosphorylate MPK3 and MPK6 in vitro, we concluded that COR suppresses MPK3/MPK6 activation through HAI1 during Pto DC3000 infection.
Fig. 4.
HAI1 is required for coronatine-mediated MAPK inactivation and immune suppression. (A) Seedlings of Col and hai1 were pretreated with 5 μM COR or mock for 6 h, followed by treatment with 1 μM flg22 for the indicated time periods. Proteins were detected by immunoblotting using the indicated antibodies. Ponceau S-stained RuBisCo is shown as a loading control. (B) Leaves of Col, mpk3, mpk6, and hai1 were infiltrated with Pto DC3000 or Pto DC3118 COR− (OD600 = 0.0002). The bacterial titers at 2 dpi were measured. Bars represent means and SEs of three independent experiments with at least 12 biological replicates in each experiment. The Benjamini–Hochberg method was used to adjust P values for multiple hypothesis testing. Statistically significant differences are indicated by different letters (adjusted P < 0.05). Asterisk indicates statistically significant differences (*P < 0.01, two-tailed t tests).
MPK3 and MPK6 contribute redundantly to stomatal closure in response to Pto DC3000, which is reversed by COR (8, 37, 38). We found that Pto DC3000 is able to reopen stomata both in the wild type and hai1 (SI Appendix, Fig. S8), suggesting that HAI1-mediated MAPK inactivation is not essential for the COR virulence function that overcomes stomatal immunity.
To test the impact of COR-mediated MAPK inactivation on apoplastic immunity, we syringe-infiltrated Pto DC3000 or Pto DC3118 into leaves of the wild type, mpk3, mpk6, and hai1. COR-mediated bacterial growth promotion was significantly reduced in hai1 (Fig. 4B). Interestingly, the growth of Pto DC3118 was enhanced in mpk3 (Fig. 4B). Overall, these results support that COR suppresses apoplastic immunity through HAI1-mediated MAPK inactivation.
ETI Overcomes the HAI1-Dependent Coronatine Virulence Effect.
AvrRpt2 and AvrRpm1 are P. syringae effectors the virulent actions of which are recognized by the NLR receptors RPS2 and RPM1, respectively, triggering ETI in Col (1). We found no significant induction of HAI1 and the other COR-responsive genes, ANAC019/055/072, during infection by Pto DC3000 carrying AvrRpt2 or AvrRpm1 (Fig. 3A and SI Appendix, Fig. S9). A possible explanation for this observation is that ETI blocks activation of JA signaling by COR. We tested this possibility using A. thaliana lines carrying an estradiol-inducible AvrRpt2 transgene (XVE-AvrRpt2) (17). XVE-AvrRpt2 seedlings were treated with estradiol for 6 h, followed by mock or COR treatment for 1 h. Induction of HAI1 and another JA-responsive gene, VSP2, was significantly lower in the wild type than in the rps2 mutant background but comparable between the wild-type and the SA-deficient sid2 mutant background (Fig. 5A). Consistent with this finding, HAI1-dependent bacterial growth promotion was no longer seen for Pto DC3000 carrying AvrRpt2 (Fig. 5B). Thus, ETI triggered by AvrRpt2 blocks JA signaling in an SA-independent manner and counteracts the HAI1-dependent virulence effect of COR.
Fig. 5.
Effector-triggered immunity counteracts the HAI1-dependent coronatine virulence effect. (A) Seedlings of the estradiol-inducible AvrRpt2 transgenic line in Col background or in rps2 or sid2 mutant backgrounds were treated with estradiol (10 μM) for 6 h, followed by COR treatment (5 μM) for 1 h. The expression levels of HAI1 and VSP2 were determined by RT-qPCR. Bars represent means and SEs of the log2 fold change relative to mock, calculated from three independent experiments using mixed linear models. Statistically significant differences are indicated by different letters (P < 0.01, two-tailed t tests). (B) Leaves of Col, hai1, and abi2 were infiltrated with Pto DC3000 or Pto AvrRpt2 (OD600 = 0.0002). The bacterial titers at 2 dpi were measured. Bars represent means and SEs of four independent experiments with at least eight biological replicates in each experiment. The Benjamini–Hochberg method was used to adjust P values for multiple hypothesis testing. Statistically significant differences are indicated by different letters (adjusted P < 0.01). Asterisk indicates statistically significant differences (*P < 0.01, two-tailed t tests).
Conservation of ABA- and JA-Mediated Regulation of the HAI PP2Cs in Brassicaceae.
Our data showed that ABA and JA activate expression of specific members of HAI PP2Cs that suppress MAPKs in A. thaliana (SI Appendix, Figs. S1A, S4C, and S5). The importance of these transcriptional effects could be reflected by evolutionary conservation in plants. To address this, we used the amino acid sequences of A. thaliana HAI1, HAI2, HAI3, and other clade A PP2Cs to search for their possible orthologs in some Brassicaceae species, tomato and rice plants the genome sequences and gene annotations of which are available. Construction of a phylogenetic tree suggested that the HAI1, HAI2, and HAI3 clades are restricted to Brassicaceae (SI Appendix, Fig. S10). We therefore tested whether HAI1, HAI2, and HAI3 are responsive to ABA and JA in Capsella rubella, a close relative of A. thaliana, and in Eutrema salsugineum, a relatively phylogenetically distant species from A. thaliana. ABA induced all of the HAI PP2Cs in both C. rubella and E. salsugineum (SI Appendix, Fig. S11 A and B). We found that the core ABRE motif (ACGTG) is present in the promoters of the HAI PP2Cs not only in A. thaliana but also in other Brassicaceae species including C. rubella and E. salsugineum (SI Appendix, Fig. S12), suggesting that Brassicaceae species may commonly use AREB/ABF transcription factors for the transcriptional regulation of the HAI PP2Cs by ABA. After MeJA treatment, rapid HAI1 induction was observed in both C. rubella and E. salsugineum (SI Appendix, Fig. S11 C and D). The CACGTG G box motif is present in the HAI1 promoters of the Brassicaceae species analyzed (SI Appendix, Fig. S12A). Thus, MYC2 may be a key transcription factor for JA-mediated HAI1 induction in Brassicaceae species as it is in A. thaliana. Overall, the evolutionary conservation of the transcriptional effects of ABA and JA on the HAI PP2Cs suggests their importance in ABA- and JA-regulated processes in Brassicaceae.
Discussion
In this study, we showed that ABA and JA signaling suppresses activation of the immune-associated MAPKs, MPK3 and MPK6, through the HAI PP2Cs. This provides a framework for explaining the negative impacts of ABA and JA on plant immunity. We demonstrated that the bacterial pathogen Pto DC3000 exploits JA-mediated MAPK suppression by producing COR. Because MPK3 and MPK6 are immune signaling components shared by PTI and ETI (2), a fundamental question is how ETI prevents pathogen suppression of the MAPKs. Here, we show that the transcriptional induction of HAI1 and the HAI1-dependent immune suppression by COR are prevented upon ETI activation, demonstrating that ETI overcomes pathogen targeting of MAPKs. Interception of JA signaling during ETI may also be relevant to sustained MAPK activation (17), as well as to inhibition of COR-mediated stomatal reopening (37).
ABA negatively impacts plant immunity to diverse pathogens, which can be attributed to ABA-mediated suppression of defense activation by immune hormones including JA, ET, and SA (15). In this study, we demonstrated that ABA promotes MPK3/MPK6 inactivation and susceptibility to Pto DC3000 through HAI PP2Cs (Fig. 2A and SI Appendix, Figs. S1 and S3A). Interestingly, in rice, ABA was shown to mediate MPK6 inactivation, thereby suppressing rice blast resistance (39), although phosphatases of a different type are involved. Thus, MAPK inactivation by ABA is a convergent evolution in monocots and eudicots.
COR is a JA-mimicking phytotoxin produced by various strains of P. syringae (7). A virulence function of COR involves suppression of SA accumulation mediated by the MYC2-ANAC019/055/072 signaling module (8). However, this mechanism does not fully account for the ability of COR to promote P. syringae growth in the apoplast (8). Here, we showed that COR directly induces expression of HAI1 through MYC2 (Fig. 3 C and D). HAI1 showed phosphatase activity toward MPK3 and MPK6 (Fig. 2C) and was necessary for MPK3/MPK6 inactivation by COR (Fig. 4A and SI Appendix, Fig. S6). Importantly, HAI1 was required for the promotion of Pto DC3000 growth in a COR-dependent manner (Fig. 4B). Thus, our results unveiled a mechanism by which COR suppresses MAPK activation and immunity through HAI1. Although HAI1 was specifically induced by COR at an early stage of Pto DC3000 infection, ABA-responsive HAI2 was also induced at a late stage (Fig. 3A). It is thus possible that pathogen-induced ABA contributes to MAPK suppression, as the lack of ABA-inducing effector AvrPtoB together with AvrPto resulted in enhanced MAPK activation (SI Appendix, Fig. S3 C and D). COR and pathogen-induced ABA may compensate for the virulence of Pto DC3000 lacking a functional HopAI1 effector, which inactivates MAPKs (40, 41).
Although PTI and ETI share immune signaling components, ETI is effective against pathogens that dampen PTI (2, 6). Although HAI1 was induced by Pto D3000, this virulence mechanism was prevented upon ETI activation by AvrRpt2 or AvrRpm1 (Fig. 3A). Moreover, ETI triggered by the AvrRpt2 effector in the absence of pathogen infection was sufficient to inhibit HAI1 induction by COR (Fig. 5A). These results suggest that ETI blocks activation of JA signaling by COR. Our experiments do not rule out the possibility that ETI also affects COR production in the bacterial cell and/or COR delivery into the plant cell. Recently, Liu et al. reported that expression of some JA-responsive genes is activated during ETI (42). The discrepancy between our and their studies could be explained by selective activation or repression of JA-responsive genes during ETI. Consistent with the ability of ETI to block HAI1 induction by COR, HAI1-dependent growth promotion was not observed for Pto DC3000 carrying AvrRpt2 (Fig. 5B). These results are analogous to the previous report that AtMIN7, an immune component required for both PTI and ETI, is protected from degradation by the P. syringae effector HopM1 during ETI (43). ETI activation also leads to interference with ABA signaling, often exploited by pathogens for virulence (14, 44, 45). Collectively, these findings support an emerging idea that ETI counteracts pathogen virulence actions that directly or indirectly interfere with immune components, thereby conferring pathogen resistance.
We showed that ABA and JA induce specific sets of HAI1, HAI2 and HAI3 not only in A. thaliana but also in C. rubella and E. salsugineum (SI Appendix, Figs. S1A, S4C, and S11), suggesting their importance in ABA- and JA-regulated processes in Brassicaceae species. Notably, MPK3 and/or MPK6 are activated by ABA and JA and are implicated in ABA- and JA-regulated developmental and stress responses in A. thaliana (46, 47). Thus, transcriptional activation of the HAI PP2Cs may provide fitness advantages as regulatory modules of ABA- and JA-signaling pathways for controlling intensity and timing of MPK3/MPK6 activation in A. thaliana and possibly in other Brassicaceae species, and it is sometimes exploited by pathogens. As a countermeasure, ETI can overcome pathogen manipulation of ABA- and JA-signaling pathways.
Materials and Methods
A. thaliana plants were grown in a chamber at 22 °C with a 10-h light period and 60% relative humidity (RH) for 3 wk and then in another chamber at 22 °C with a 12-h light period and 60% RH. Seedlings of A. thaliana, C. rubella, and E. salsugineum were grown on solidified half-strength Murashige and Skoog medium supplemented with 1% sucrose under a 10-h light period at 22 °C. MAPK assays were carried out essentially as described (17, 29). Bacterial growth assays, RT-qPCR, ChIP-qPCR, and phylogenetic analysis were performed as described (34). Stomatal aperture was measured essentially as described (37). For BiFC and subcellular localization assays, MAPKs and PP2Cs were expressed in Nicotiana benthamiana by Agrobacterium infiltration, and images were taken at 3 d post infiltration (dpi). Details of materials and methods can be found in SI Appendix, SI Materials and Methods. Primers used in this study can be found in SI Appendix, Table S1.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Paul E. Verslues (Academia Sinica) for the hai1, hai1 hai2 hai3, and abi2 mutants; Dr. Kei Hiruma (Nara Institute of Science and Technology) for the myc2 mutant; Drs. Takuya Yoshida and Kazuko Yamaguchi-Shinozaki (University of Tokyo) for the areb1 areb2 abf3 mutant; Dr. Philippe Reymond (University of Lausanne) for the myc2 myc3 myc4 mutant; Dr. Hironaka Tsukagoshi (Meijo University) for the p35S::MYC2-GFP line; Drs. Thomas Griebel [Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research (MPIPZ)] and Rainer Birkenbihl (MPIPZ) for help in ChIP experiments; Drs. Shigeo Sugano (Ritsumeikan University) and Yoichi Takeda (Ritsumeikan University) for sharing experimental equipment; and Dr. Jane Glazebrook (University of Minnesota) for critical reading of the manuscript. This work was supported by the Max Planck Society and Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Grant SFB670 (to K.T.); by a Grant-in-Aid for Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) Fellows (15J09701) and a Grant-in-Aid for young scientists (B) (17K17802) (to A.M.); and by the Ritsumeikan Global Innovation Research Organization (A.M. and A.T.). A.M. was a recipient of a Postdoctoral Fellowship for Research Abroad from JSPS.
Footnotes
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.
This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1702613114/-/DCSupplemental.
References
- 1.Jones JDG, Dangl JL. The plant immune system. Nature. 2006;444:323–329. doi: 10.1038/nature05286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Tsuda K, Katagiri F. Comparing signaling mechanisms engaged in pattern-triggered and effector-triggered immunity. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2010;13:459–465. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2010.04.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Boller T, Felix G. A renaissance of elicitors: Perception of microbe-associated molecular patterns and danger signals by pattern-recognition receptors. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2009;60:379–406. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.105346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Mine A, Sato M, Tsuda K. Toward a systems understanding of plant-microbe interactions. Front Plant Sci. 2014;5:423. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Asai S, Shirasu K. Plant cells under siege: Plant immune system versus pathogen effectors. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2015;28:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2015.08.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Cui H, Tsuda K, Parker JE. Effector-triggered immunity: From pathogen perception to robust defense. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2015;66:487–511. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-050213-040012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Mittal S, Davis KR. Role of the phytotoxin coronatine in the infection of Arabidopsis thaliana by Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 1995;8:165–171. doi: 10.1094/mpmi-8-0165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Zheng XY, et al. Coronatine promotes Pseudomonas syringae virulence in plants by activating a signaling cascade that inhibits salicylic acid accumulation. Cell Host Microbe. 2012;11:587–596. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2012.04.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Geng X, Cheng J, Gangadharan A, Mackey D. The coronatine toxin of Pseudomonas syringae is a multifunctional suppressor of Arabidopsis defense. Plant Cell. 2012;24:4763–4774. doi: 10.1105/tpc.112.105312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Wasternack C, Hause B. Jasmonates: Biosynthesis, perception, signal transduction and action in plant stress response, growth and development. An update to the 2007 review in Annals of Botany. Ann Bot (Lond) 2013;111:1021–1058. doi: 10.1093/aob/mct067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Finkelstein R. Abscisic acid synthesis and response. Arabidopsis Book. 2013;11:e0166. doi: 10.1199/tab.0166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Yoshida T, Mogami J, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. ABA-dependent and ABA-independent signaling in response to osmotic stress in plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2014;21:133–139. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2014.07.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.de Torres Zabala M, Bennett MH, Truman WH, Grant MR. Antagonism between salicylic and abscisic acid reflects early host-pathogen conflict and moulds plant defence responses. Plant J. 2009;59:375–386. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.03875.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.de Torres-Zabala M, et al. Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato hijacks the Arabidopsis abscisic acid signalling pathway to cause disease. EMBO J. 2007;26:1434–1443. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Robert-Seilaniantz A, Grant M, Jones JDG. Hormone crosstalk in plant disease and defense: More than just jasmonate-salicylate antagonism. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2011;49:317–343. doi: 10.1146/annurev-phyto-073009-114447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Meng X, Zhang S. MAPK cascades in plant disease resistance signaling. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2013;51:245–266. doi: 10.1146/annurev-phyto-082712-102314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Tsuda K, et al. Dual regulation of gene expression mediated by extended MAPK activation and salicylic acid contributes to robust innate immunity in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS Genet. 2013;9:e1004015. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ren D, et al. A fungal-responsive MAPK cascade regulates phytoalexin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:5638–5643. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0711301105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ramírez V, López A, Mauch-Mani B, Gil MJ, Vera P. An extracellular subtilase switch for immune priming in Arabidopsis. PLoS Pathog. 2013;9:e1003445. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ren D, Yang H, Zhang S. Cell death mediated by MAPK is associated with hydrogen peroxide production in Arabidopsis. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:559–565. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109495200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Leung J, et al. Antagonistic interaction between MAP kinase and protein phosphatase 2C in stress recovery. Plant Sci. 2006;171:596–606. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Bhaskara GB, Nguyen TT, Verslues PE. Unique drought resistance functions of the highly ABA-induced clade A protein phosphatase 2Cs. Plant Physiol. 2012;160:379–395. doi: 10.1104/pp.112.202408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Fujita Y, et al. Three SnRK2 protein kinases are the main positive regulators of abscisic acid signaling in response to water stress in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Physiol. 2009;50:2123–2132. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcp147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Antoni R, et al. PYRABACTIN RESISTANCE1-LIKE8 plays an important role for the regulation of abscisic acid signaling in root. Plant Physiol. 2013;161:931–941. doi: 10.1104/pp.112.208678. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Lim CW, Kim J-H, Baek W, Kim BS, Lee SC. Functional roles of the protein phosphatase 2C, AtAIP1, in abscisic acid signaling and sugar tolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant Sci. 2012;187:83–88. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2012.01.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Brock AK, et al. The Arabidopsis mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphatase PP2C5 affects seed germination, stomatal aperture, and abscisic acid-inducible gene expression. Plant Physiol. 2010;153:1098–1111. doi: 10.1104/pp.110.156109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Meskiene I, et al. Stress-induced protein phosphatase 2C is a negative regulator of a mitogen-activated protein kinase. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:18945–18952. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M300878200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Schweighofer A, et al. The PP2C-type phosphatase AP2C1, which negatively regulates MPK4 and MPK6, modulates innate immunity, jasmonic acid, and ethylene levels in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2007;19:2213–2224. doi: 10.1105/tpc.106.049585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Lee JS, Ellis BE. Arabidopsis MAPK phosphatase 2 (MKP2) positively regulates oxidative stress tolerance and inactivates the MPK3 and MPK6 MAPKs. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:25020–25029. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M701888200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.He P, et al. Specific bacterial suppressors of MAMP signaling upstream of MAPKKK in Arabidopsis innate immunity. Cell. 2006;125:563–575. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.02.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.O’Connor TR, Dyreson C, Wyrick JJ. Athena: A resource for rapid visualization and systematic analysis of Arabidopsis promoter sequences. Bioinformatics. 2005;21:4411–4413. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kazan K, Manners JM. MYC2: The master in action. Mol Plant. 2013;6:686–703. doi: 10.1093/mp/sss128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Ma SW, Morris VL, Cuppels DA. Characterization of a DNA region required for production of the phytotoxin coronatine by Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 1991;4:69–74. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Mine A, et al. An incoherent feed-forward loop mediates robustness and tunability in a plant immune network. EMBO Rep. 2017;18:464–476. doi: 10.15252/embr.201643051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Abe H, et al. Role of Arabidopsis MYC and MYB homologs in drought- and abscisic acid-regulated gene expression. Plant Cell. 1997;9:1859–1868. doi: 10.1105/tpc.9.10.1859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Song L, et al. A transcription factor hierarchy defines an environmental stress response network. Science. 2016;354:598. doi: 10.1126/science.aag1550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Melotto M, Underwood W, Koczan J, Nomura K, He SY. Plant stomata function in innate immunity against bacterial invasion. Cell. 2006;126:969–980. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.06.054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Su J, et al. Regulation of stomatal immunity by interdependent functions of a pathogen-responsive MPK3/MPK6 cascade and abscisic acid. Plant Cell. 2017;29:526–542. doi: 10.1105/tpc.16.00577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Ueno Y, et al. Abiotic stresses antagonize the rice defence pathway through the tyrosine-dephosphorylation of OsMPK6. PLoS Pathog. 2015;11:e1005231. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Zhang J, et al. A Pseudomonas syringae effector inactivates MAPKs to suppress PAMP-induced immunity in plants. Cell Host Microbe. 2007;1:175–185. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2007.03.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Lindeberg M, et al. Closing the circle on the discovery of genes encoding Hrp regulon members and type III secretion system effectors in the genomes of three model Pseudomonas syringae strains. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2006;19:1151–1158. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-19-1151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Liu L, et al. Salicylic acid receptors activate jasmonic acid signalling through a non-canonical pathway to promote effector-triggered immunity. Nat Commun. 2016;7:13099. doi: 10.1038/ncomms13099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Nomura K, et al. Effector-triggered immunity blocks pathogen degradation of an immunity-associated vesicle traffic regulator in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:10774–10779. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1103338108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Ding Y, Dommel M, Mou Z. Abscisic acid promotes proteasome-mediated degradation of the transcription coactivator NPR1 in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2016;86:20–34. doi: 10.1111/tpj.13141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Kim TH, et al. Chemical genetics reveals negative regulation of abscisic acid signaling by a plant immune response pathway. Curr Biol. 2011;21:990–997. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.04.045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Takahashi F, et al. The mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade MKK3-MPK6 is an important part of the jasmonate signal transduction pathway in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2007;19:805–818. doi: 10.1105/tpc.106.046581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Liu Y. Roles of mitogen-activated protein kinase cascades in ABA signaling. Plant Cell Rep. 2012;31:1–12. doi: 10.1007/s00299-011-1130-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.





