Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jul 18.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Cancer. 2016 Sep 1;139(5):996–1008. doi: 10.1002/ijc.30141

Vitamin B2 intake and colorectal cancer risk; results from the Nurses’ Health Study and the Health Professionals Follow-up Study cohort

Yeong Sook Yoon 1,2,*, Seungyoun Jung 3,*, Xuehong Zhang 4, Shuji Ogino 1,4,5, Edward L Giovannucci 1,4, Eunyoung Cho 4,6,7,**
PMCID: PMC5514841  NIHMSID: NIHMS873510  PMID: 27081929

Abstract

Vitamin B2 serves as a cofactor to enhance one-carbon metabolism, maintain mucous membranes, and has been implicated in lowering colorectal cancer (CRC) risk. However, few prospective studies have examined the association between vitamin B2 intake and CRC. In this study, we estimated the associations between vitamin B2 intake and CRC risk using the Nurses’ Health Study (NHS) and the Health Professionals Follow-Up Study (HPFS) cohorts. Vitamin B2 intake was measured by a validated food frequency questionnaire every 4 years. Among 100,033 women in the NHS and 44,007 men in the HPFS we documented a total of 3,037 incident CRC cases (2,093 women and 944 men) during 24–26 years of follow-up until 2010. Intakes of total (from food and supplements), dietary (from food only), and supplemental vitamin B2 were inversely related to CRC risk in age-adjusted analysis in NHS. However, the association was attenuated and no longer statistically significant in multivariate analysis (P-trend ≥0.08). The pooled multivariate relative risks (95% confidence interval) comparing individuals in the extreme quintiles of intakes were 0.93 (0.81–1.06) for total vitamin B2, 0.89 (0.61–1.28) for dietary vitamin B2 and 0.94 (0.81–1.08) for supplemental vitamin B2. These associations of total vitamin B2 intake were similar for risk of CRC with varying lag-time periods (0–4, 4–8, 8–12, or 12–16 years), for risk of CRC subtypes by tumor location, and across strata of intake of folate or alcohol. Our prospective data do not support a beneficial role of vitamin B2 intake in lowering incidence of CRC.

Keywords: vitamin B2, colorectal neoplasms, cohort studies, alcohol, folate, diet, supplements, latency

Introduction

Impairments in the one-carbon metabolism may affect methylation and synthesis of DNA, thereby influencing colorectal carcinogenesis. Within the one-carbon metabolism, vitamin B2 serves as a cofactor for methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR), a crucial enzyme enhancing DNA integrity mediating purine, pyrimidine production, and is involved in epigenetic alteration by promoting the production of methyl donors required for DNA methylation1. Furthermore, vitamin B2 helps to maintain the mucosal membranes in the digestive system and upregulates the immune response by facilitating the conversion of tryptophan into niacin within the kynurenine metabolism1.

Despite these mechanisms suggesting a potential role of B2 in colorectal carcinogenesis, epidemiological studies have been inconsistent. In contrast to null findings from most individual cohort studies28 and case-control studies917, a recent meta-analyses found significant inverse association between vitamin B2 intake and risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) from four case-control studies (pooled odds ratio (OR) =0.78, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.66–0.91 for highest versus lowest categories of intake of vitamins B2) and from five prospective cohort studies (pooled OR=0.86, 95% CI: 0.76–0.97)18, 19. These suggest that limited statistical power might have been a reason for the null associations in individual studies. On the other hand, some of the studies included in the meta-analysis had a limited adjustment of risk factors of CRC and thus might have suffered residual confounding. Also, potential publication bias was noted among observational studies included in the meta-analyses 18.

Most previous studies have assessed vitamin B2 intake only from food sources and did not take into account intake from supplemental sources27, 11, 13, 14, 16, 17. Only a few studies evaluated the associations between total vitamin B2 intake including supplements9, 10, 12, 15, 20 or supplemental vitamin B2 intake itself20 and CRC risk. In the Women’s Health Initiative Observational study(WHI-OS) dietary vitamin B2 intake and supplemental vitamin B2 intake were not associated with risk of CRC, but total vitamin B2 intake was significantly associated with a lower risk of CRC (multivariate relative risk [RR] = 0.81; 95% CI = 0.66–0.99, for >3.97 mg/d versus < 1.80 mg/d)20.

In addition, the effects of diet or nutrient intake as well as timing of exposure to these dietary factors (i.e., intake in the remote past or in the recent before diagnosis) might have different influences on CRC risk. For example, folate intake in the remote past was found to be most strongly inversely associated with risk of CRC21, which suggests the importance of timing of intake of one-carbon metabolism-related nutrients on the development of CRC. However, previous cohort studies28, 20 only had a single assessment of vitamin B2 intake. No study has examined the latency of vitamin B2 intake in relation to CRC risk.

Furthermore, the association between vitamin B2 intake and CRC risk might be modified by other factors. Alcohol is known to disrupt the metabolism of vitamin B2 and induce DNA instability and abnormal DNA methylation22. Thus, alcohol intake might modify the association between vitamin B2 and CRC, but findings have been inconsistent2, 6, 9, 20. One-carbon metabolism is a complex network that interconnects multiple nutrients. The association between vitamin B2 intake and CRC risk might be modified by folate2, 4, 9, 20 and other nutrients related to the one-carbon metabolism.

Hence, we performed this study to evaluate the association of intakes of total (from foods and supplements), dietary (from foods only), and supplemental vitamin B2 with risk of CRC. Further, we evaluated whether the association varies according to the time between vitamin B2 intakes and CRC diagnosis and anatomic subsites and by several CRC risk factors including alcohol consumption, smoking status, multivitamin use, folate intake, calcium intake and family history of CRC.

Methods

Study design and participants

The Nurses’ Health Study (NHS) and the Health Professionals Follow-Up Study (HPFS) are ongoing prospective cohort studies21, 23, 24. The NHS was initiated in 1976 including 121,700 registered female nurses of aged 30 to 55 years. The HPFS was a prospective cohort study including 51,529 male health professionals aged 40–75 years initiated it 1986. Participants responded to biennial follow-up questionnaires including demographic information, medical histories, lifestyles, and risk factors for chronic diseases. The follow-up of both cohorts was generally complete for more than 90%.

For the current examination of vitamin B2 intake in relation to CRC risk, the baseline year was 1984 in the NHS and 1986 in HPFS, when vitamin B2 was first assessed from a comprehensive dietary food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) with ~130 food items. We excluded participants who reported implausible calorie intake (<600 or >3500 kcal/d for women and <800 or >4200 kcal/d for men) or left more than 70 questions blank in the FFQ. We also excluded participants who were previously diagnosed with cancer (except non-melanoma skin cancer) and who had ulcerative colitis or Crohn’s disease at baseline. Consequently, 100,033 women in the NHS and 44,007 men in the HPFS were included in this analysis and followed until 2010. These studies were approved by the institutional review board at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health and Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

Assessment of dietary intake

Dietary information was collected using a validated FFQ with ~130 food items approximately every 2–4 years since 1984 in the NHS and since 1986 in the HPFS25. Nutrient intake was calculated by multiplying the frequency response of each specified food item by the nutrient content of the specified portion sizes and by summing these products for all food items. A food composition database from the US Department of Agriculture and other sources was used to estimate nutrient intake26, 27. The use of multivitamins and other dietary supplements was ascertained via biennial questionnaires. Total vitamin B2 intake included intakes from foods and supplements, whereas dietary vitamin B2 intake included intakes from foods only. Intakes of vitamins B2 measured by FFQ have previously been validated25, 2830. For participants in NHS and HPFS, approximately 60% amount of total vitamin B2 intake was from supplements containing vitamin B2. Nutrient intakes were cumulatively averaged and adjusted for energy intake using residual methods31. The correlation coefficients of total vitamin B2 intake and dairy foods (main food sources of vitamin B2) from FFQ and from two one-week diet records were 0.88 and 0.70 for men and 0.58 and 0.79 for women25, 2830, respectively.

Ascertainment of CRC cases

Newly diagnosed CRC cases from baseline until 2010 were identified through participants’ self-report on each biennial questionnaire, and confirmed through medical and pathological record review. The National Death Index was used to identify participants whose death was attributable to CRC32. Information on tumor location was extracted from medical records and pathology reports. A total of 2,093 incident CRC cases in the NHS and 944 cases in the HPFS were identified and included in the analysis.

Assessment of confounding variables

Information on potential confounders such as body mass index (BMI), physical activity, smoking status, aspirin use, hormone replacement therapy (only in NHS), multivitamin supplement use, family history of CRC, and history of sigmoidoscopy/colonoscopy were collected from self-reported biennial questionnaires.

Statistical analysis

We used cumulative average vitamin B2 intakes as our primary exposure33 and also separately estimated baseline vitamin B2 intakes and intakes with a varying lag time before diagnosis of CRC to evaluate the latency between vitamin B2 intake and CRC21, 23. For example, in the HPFS, for latency of 0–4 years before diagnosis, we used vitamin B2 intake in 1986 for cases diagnosed from 1986 through 1990; intake in 1990 for cases diagnosed from 1990 through 1994; and so forth. The lag time of vitamin B2 intake for non-cases was assessed in the same way relative to censor time. We categorized vitamin B2 intake into quintiles based on the intake distribution in our study population.

A Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate RR and 95% CI across quintiles of vitamin B2 intake for risk of overall CRC and anatomic subsites of CRC separately in NHS and HPFS. Person-years of follow-up for every analysis was calculated from the date of baseline questionnaire return (1984 for NHS; 1986 for HPFS) to the date of CRC diagnosis, death, loss to follow-up, or end of the follow-up (2010), whichever came first. Age at baseline (in months) and the calendar year of questionnaire return were included as stratification variables. The multivariate model adjusted for factors associated with CRC risk and vitamin B2 intakes as follows: BMI (<25, 25–<30, or ≥30, kg/m2), pack-years of smoking before age 30 (continuous, pack-years), family history of colorectal cancer (yes or no), history of sigmoidoscopy/colonoscopy (yes or no), physical activity (quintiles, MET-hrs/wk), aspirin use (yes or no), postmenopausal hormone use (premenopausal, never, past, or current; NHS only), intake of total calorie (quintiles, Kcal/day) 31, alcohol (<5, 5–<10, 10–<15, 15–<30, or ≥30, g/day), red meat (quintiles, serving/day), dietary calcium (quintiles, mg/day), dietary folate (quintiles, μg/day), and dietary vitamin D (quintiles, IU/day). Missing indicators were created for missing responses for each covariate, if applicable. Tests for linear trend were conducted using the median values of each quintile of vitamin B2 as continuous term and calculating Wald statistic of it. The study-specific RR was pooled using a random effects model 34, 35. The heterogeneity between two studies was assessed by calculating the Q statistic35.

In sensitivity analyses, cases diagnosed within the first two years of follow-up were excluded to evaluate the potential influence of subclinical diseases. We also restricted our analyses to non-users of multivitamins or additionally adjusted for multivitamin use or other one-carbon nutrients such as methionine, vitamin B6, choline, vitamin B12, and betaine in multivariate models. We conducted analyses stratified by alcohol consumption, smoking status, multivitamin use, folate intake, calcium intake and family history of CRC. Test for effect modification was conducted by including the cross-product term between a continuous term for vitamin B2 intake and categorical terms for stratification factors in the multivariate model36_ENREF_36.

All analyses were performed using the SAS software package (version 9.1). All tests were two-sided and P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

In this prospective analysis including 3,037 CRC cases during 24–26 years of follow-up from two cohorts, individuals with higher intake of total vitamin B2 were more likely to be physically active, use multivitamins and aspirins, and have greater intakes of dietary folate, calcium, and vitamin D (Table 1).

Table 1.

Age-standardized demographic, lifestyle, and dietary characteristics of participants in 1990 in the Nurses’ Health Study (NHS) and the Health Professionals Follow-up Study (HPFS) according to quintiles of total vitamin B2 intakea

Quintiles of total vitamin B2 intake

Characteristics Q1 Q3 Q5
NHS
 Median intake (mg/day) 1.33 2.2 9.6
 No. of participants 17692 17865 17509
 Age (y) 55.6(7.1) 57.0(7.2) 57.4(7.1)
 BMI (kg/m2) 25.7(5.0) 26.0(5.0) 25.5(4.9)
 Physical activity (MET-h/wk)b 11.9(14.6) 14.2(16.1) 15.1(16.7)
 Pack years smoking before age 30 4.0(5.2) 3.5(5.2) 3.8(5.5)
 Endoscopy experience (%) 22 33 23
 Family history of colorectal cancer (%) 11 12 12
 Aspirin use (%) 35 40 45
 Current multivitamin use (%) 5 33 73
 Alcohol drinker (%) 70 63 66
 Dietary intake
  Total energy (Kcal/day) 1621(441) 1811(484) 1703(465)
  Red meat intake (servings/day) 1.1(0.5) 1.1(0.5) 1.0(0.5)
  Fruit and vegetable intake (servings/day) 4.3(1.6) 5.3(2.0) 5.3(2.0)
  Alcohol consumption (g/day) 7.9(11.9) 6.1(9.0) 6.6(10.5)
  Vitamin D intake (IU/day) 178.3(100.6) 326.1(165.4) 460.9(308.5)
  Calcium intake (mg/day) 693.6(299) 1015(328) 1192(467)
  Folate intake (μg/day) 284.7(79.5) 408.1(157.2) 536.9(260.7)
  Whole milk (servings/day) 0.09(0.20) 0.18(0.44) 0.12(0.31)
  Skim milk (servings/day) 0.23(0.29) 1.07(0.86) 0.80(0.78)
  Breakfast cereal (servings/day) 0.15(0.20) 0.40(0.32) 0.32(0.30)
HPFS
 Median intake (mg/day) 1.5 2.5 11.4
 No. of participants 8642 8647 8572
 Age (y) 56.1(9.1) 57.8(9.7) 58.7(9.6)
 BMI (kg/m2) 25.7(3.0) 25.6(3.0) 25.4(3.0)
 Physical activity (MET-h/wk) 31.7(32.5) 36.1(36.7) 36.0(39.3)
 Pack years smoking before age 30 5.5(7.2) 4.7(7.0) 5.1(7.1)
 Endoscopy experience (%) 32 36 38
 Family history of colorectal cancer (%) 10 11 11
 Aspirin use (%) 31 35 41
 Current multivitamin use (%) 4 27 81
 Alcohol drinker (%) 84 78 80
 Dietary intake
  Total energy (Kcal/day) 1777(457) 2001(553) 1858(492)
  Red meat intake (servings/day) 1.2(0.9) 1.3(0.9) 1.0(0.8)
  Fruit and vegetable intake (servings/day) 4.8(2.3) 5.8(2.7) 5.9(2.8)
  Alcohol consumption (g/day) 11.8(14.8) 10.1(11.9) 11.2(14.0)
  Vitamin D intake (IU/day) 256.5(123.7) 388.3(156.6) 574.6(358.8)
  Calcium intake (mg/day) 636(204) 967(302) 1075(486)
  Folate intake (μg/day) 343.5(88.3) 445.8(145.2) 633.5(312.3)
  Whole milk (servings/day) 0.06(0.17) 0.19(0.53) 0.11(0.35)
  Skim milk (servings/day) 0.24(0.31) 1.17(0.99) 0.78(0.86)
  Breakfast cereal (servings/day) 0.19(0.26) 0.51(0.40) 0.41(0.40)

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; MET-h, metabolic equivalent task hours

a

Values are means (SD) or percentages, otherwise specified. All data except age are standardized to the age distribution of the study population.

b

MET-h= sum of the average time spent in each activity × the MET value of each activity.

The associations of total, dietary, and supplemental vitamin B2 intakes with CRC are presented in Table 2. Women in the highest quintile of total, dietary, and supplemental vitamin B2 intake had an age-adjusted RR of 0.69(95% CI: 0.60–0.79, p-trend<0.001), 0.81(95% CI: 0.70–0.92, p-trend =0.01), and 0.70(95% CI: 0.61–0.82, p-trend <0.001) for CRC compared with women in the lowest quintile. However, these significant associations were attenuated and no longer statistically significant after further adjustments for life style and dietary factors; among those, calcium intake was the major confounder. The pooled multivariate RRs and 95% CI comparing individuals in the highest to the lowest quintiles of intake were 0.93 (0.81–1.06) for total vitamin B2, 0.89(0.61–1.28) for dietary vitamin B2, and 0.94 (0.81–1.08) for supplemental vitamin B2 (p-trend ≥ 0.59). Comparing extreme intakes of total vitamin B2 using deciles yielded similar results; the pooled multivariable RR was 0.82 (0.68–1.00) comparing individuals in the highest to the lowest deciles (not shown in tables). Adjustment for both dietary and supplementary intakes of vitamin B2 simultaneously in the multivariate model did not change the results materially (data not shown). The association of dietary intake of vitamin B2 with CRC risk significantly differed between men and women (p-heterogeniety=0.01) and men in the highest quintile of dietary vitamin B2 intake, compared to those in the lowest quintile, had a multivariate RR of 0.73(95% CI: 0.56–0.93, p-trend =0.03), whereas no significant association was observed in women.

Table 2.

Relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of colorectal cancer according to quintiles of energy-adjusted vitamin B2 intake in the Nurses’ Health Study (NHS) and Health Professionals Follow-up Study (HPFS)a

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 P-trendb P-between-studies heterogeneity for the highest categoryc
Total vitamin B2
 Median intake, mg/day (NHS/HPFS) 1.6/1.8 2.3/2.4 3.0/3.2 4.5/5.0 14.3/15.9
 Person-years (NHS/HPFS) 434,225/185,205 450,112/191,724 463,128/192,218 455,581/189,487 452,051/189,712
 No. of cases (NHS/HPFS) 455/197 429/196 459/185 393/171 357/198
 Age-adjusted RR (95% CI)
  NHS 1 (reference) 0.86 (0.76–0.98) 0.87 (0.76–0.99) 0.73 (0.64–0.84) 0.69 (0.60–0.79) <0.001
  HPFS 1 (reference) 0.87 (0.71–1.06) 0.77 (0.63–0.95) 0.69 (0.56–0.85) 0.84 (0.68–1.02) 0.76
  Pooled 1 (reference) 0.86 (0.77–0.97) 0.84 (0.75–0.94) 0.72 (0.64–0.81) 0.75 (0.62–0.90) 0.002 0.13
 Multivariable RR (95% CI)d
  NHS 1 (reference) 0.99 (0.86–1.14) 1.11 (0.95–1.29) 0.98 (0.84–1.15) 0.93 (0.79–1.10) 0.08
  HPFS 1 (reference) 0.89 (0.72–1.11) 0.80 (0.62–1.02) 0.74 (0.57–0.95) 0.91 (0.71–1.17) 0.32
  Pooled 1 (reference) 0.96 (0.85–1.08) 0.95 (0.69–1.32) 0.87 (0.65–1.15) 0.93 (0.81–1.06) 0.83 0.87
Dietary vitamin B2
 Median intake, mg/day (NHS/HPFS) 1.4/1.6 1.6/1.8 1.8/2.0 2.0/2.3 2.3/2.7
 Person-years (NHS/HPFS) 432,947/187,419 455,991/192,520 453,969/193,657 450,968/189,083 461,223/185,668
 No. of cases (NHS/HPFS) 411/196 397/192 437/182 434/210 414/167
 Age-adjusted RR (95% CIs)
  NHS 1 (reference) 0.88 (0.77–1.01) 0.93 (0.81–1.07) 0.90 (0.79–1.03) 0.81 (0.70–0.92) 0.01
  HPFS 1 (reference) 0.90 (0.73–1.10) 0.78 (0.64–0.96) 0.87 (0.71–1.05) 0.67 (0.54–0.83) <0.001
  Pooled 1 (reference) 0.89 (0.79–0.99) 0.87 (0.73–1.03) 0.89 (0.80–0.99) 0.75 (0.63–0.89) 0.01 0.16
 Multivariable RR (95% CIs)
  NHS 1 (reference) 0.95 (0.83–1.10) 1.07 (0.93–1.24) 1.10 (0.95–1.28) 1.06 (0.90–1.24) 0.41
  HPFS 1 (reference) 0.91 (0.74–1.13) 0.81 (0.65–1.02) 0.92 (0.73–1.15) 0.73 (0.56–0.93) 0.03
  Pooled 1 (reference) 0.94 (0.83–1.06) 0.95 (0.72–1.24) 1.03 (0.86–1.22) 0.89 (0.61–1.28) 0.59 0.01
Supplemental vitamin B2
 Median intake-mg/day (NHS/HPFS) 0/0 0.6/0.3 1.1/1.0 2.6/2.8 12.5/13.1
 Person-years (NHS/HPFS) 781,167/369,428 303,550/101,522 461,176/198,219 423,317/188,797 285,888/90,380
 No. of cases (NHS/HPFS) 736/388 293/100 431/184 380/181 253/94
 Age-adjusted RR (95% CIs)
  NHS 1 (reference) 0.97 (0.84–1.11) 0.88 (0.78–1.00) 0.80 (0.70–0.90) 0.70 (0.61–0.82) <0.001
  HPFS 1 (reference) 0.95 (0.76–1.19) 0.82 (0.68–0.98) 0.84 (0.70–1.00) 0.96 (0.75–1.22) 0.69
  Pooled 1 (reference) 0.96 (0.85–1.09) 0.86 (0.78–0.95) 0.81 (0.73–0.90) 0.81 (0.60–1.09) 0.04 0.19
 Multivariable RR (95% CIs)
  NHS 1 (reference) 1.09 (0.94–1.26) 1.08 (0.94–1.24) 1.01 (0.87–1.16) 0.91 (0.77–1.07) 0.09
  HPFS 1 (reference) 0.93 (0.74–1.18) 0.84 (0.68–1.03) 0.88 (0.72–1.08) 1.01 (0.77–1.33) 0.49
  Pooled 1 (reference) 1.04 (0.89–1.20) 0.96 (0.76–1.23) 0.96 (0.85–1.09) 0.94 (0.81–1.08) 0.68 0.53
a

A Cox proportional hazards model was used and values are relative risk and 95% confidence intervals in parenthesis

b

Two sided; calculated by using Wald’s test statistic

c

Two sided; calculated by using the Q test statistic

d

Adjusted for BMI (<25, 25–<30, or ≥30, kg/m2), pack-years of smoking before age 30 (continuous, pack-years), family history of colorectal cancer (yes or no), history of sigmoidoscopy/colonoscopy (yes or no), physical activity (quintiles, MET-hrs/wk), aspirin use (yes or no), postmenopausal hormone use (premenopausal, never, past, or current; NHS only), intake of total calorie (quintiles, Kcal/day), alcohol (<5, 5–<10, 10–<15, 15–<30, or ≥30, g/day), red meat (quintiles, serving/day), dietary calcium (quintiles, mg/day), dietary folate (quintiles, μg/day), and dietary vitamin D (quintiles, IU/day); age in months and year of questionnaire return were included as stratification variables.

When we evaluated the varying latent time period for the association between total vitamin B2 intake and CRC risk (Table 3), total vitamin B2 intake was not significantly associated with risk of CRC regardless of the length of lag-time between vitamin B2 intake and CRC diagnosis, although there was some suggestion of inverse association with longer time lag. The pooled multivariate RRs and 95% CI comparing individuals in the highest vs. lowest quintiles of total vitamin B2 intake were 1.01 (0.87–1.18) for intake 0–4 years before diagnosis, 0.95 (0.81–1.12) for intake 4–8 years before diagnosis, 0.92 (0.76–1.10) for intake 8–12 years before diagnosis, and 0.88 (0.72–1. 09) for intake 12–16 years before diagnosis (all P-trend≥0.65). The corresponding RR (95% CI) was 0.87 (0.76–1.00) for baseline intake.

Table 3.

Multivariate adjusted relative risk (RR)a and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) of colorectal cancer using various lag time according to quintiles of energy-adjusted total vitamin B2 intake in the Nurses’ Health Study (NHS) and Health Professionals Follow-up Study (HPFS)

Quintiles of total vitamin B2 intake P-trendb P-between-studies heterogeneity for the highest categoryc
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5
Baseline
 Person-years (NHS/HPFS) 333,103/189,715 338,427/190,513 420,055/186,616 404,484/183,049 369,491/182,283
 No. of cases (NHS/HPFS) 317/211 323/200 400/173 359/174 291/179
 NHS 1 (reference) 1.01 (0.86–1.18) 1.01 (0.86–1.18) 1.00 (0.85–1.18) 0.89 (0.75–1.06) 0.08
 HPFS 1 (reference) 0.93 (0.76–1.14) 0.78 (0.63–0.98) 0.79 (0.63–0.99) 0.84 (0.67–1.05) 0.56
 Pooled 1 (reference) 0.98 (0.86, 1.11) 0.90 (0.71–1.15) 0.90 (0.72–1.14) 0.87 (0.76–1.00) 0.09 0.65
Simple update (0–4-y lag)
 Person-years (NHS/HPFS) 424,479/183,312 447,115/188,893 462,795/191,916 468,822/195,599 451,887/188,627
 No. of cases (NHS/HPFS) 469/177 410/189 429/198 397/195 388/188
 NHS 1 (reference) 0.89 (0.77–1.03) 1.03 (0.87–1.21) 0.98 (0.81–1.18) 0.99 (0.83–1.19) 0.84
 HPFS 1 (reference) 1.03 (0.83–1.29) 1.01 (0.78–1.30) 0.98 (0.73–1.30) 1.06 (0.81–1.40) 0.39
 Pooled 1 (reference) 0.93 (0.81–1.08) 1.02 (0.89–1.17) 0.98 (0.84–1.14) 1.01 (0.87–1.18) 0.50 0.68
4–8-y lag
 Person-years (NHS/HPFS) 346,632/151,098 360,332/153,356 372,437/153,221 373,213/154,205 361,940/151,055
 No. of cases (NHS/HPFS) 377/168 395/172 376/156 346/153 297/144
 NHS 1 (reference) 1.06 (0.90–1.23) 1.07 (0.89–1.28) 1.07 (0.87–1.32) 0.96 (0.79–1.17) 0.23
 HPFS 1 (reference) 1.01 (0.80–1.28) 0.91 (0.69–1.20) 0.92 (0.68–1.26) 0.93 (0.69–1.26) 0.70
 Pooled 1 (reference) 1.04 (0.91–1.18) 1.02 (0.87–1.19) 1.02 (0.86–1.22) 0.95 (0.81–1.12) 0.23 0.87
8–12-y lag
 Person-years (NHS/HPFS) 272,030/121,177 280,259/121,024 287,731/118,879 284,832/117,732 277,057/116,363
 No. of cases (NHS/HPFS) 322/133 335/127 289/121 278/121 242/121
 NHS 1 (reference) 1.09 (0.92–1.29) 0.98 (0.80–1.20) 0.98 (0.78–1.24) 0.91 (0.73–1.13) 0.12
 HPFS 1 (reference) 0.98 (0.75–1. 29) 0.96 (0.70–1.31) 0.89 (0.62–1.28) 0.95 (0.67–1.32) 0.98
 Pooled 1 (reference) 1.06 (0.92–1.22) 0.97 (0.82–1.15) 0.96 (0.79–1.16) 0.92 (0.76–1.10) 0.21 0.83
12–16-y lag
 Person-years (NHS/HPFS) 201,928/89,533 20,6135/89,632 212,893/86,692 207,598/85,026 201,219/83,508
 No. of cases (NHS/HPFS) 251/112 259/101 234/75 193/65 182/81
 NHS 1 (reference) 1.13 (0.93–1.36) 1.05 (0.83–1.31) 0.92 (0.70–1.20) 0.89 (0.69–1.14) 0.27
 HPFS 1 (reference) 0.92 (0.68–1.24) 0.77 (0.53–1.11) 0.72 (0.47–1.10) 0.88 (0.60–1.29) 0.62
 Pooled 1 (reference) 1.05 (0.87–1.27) 0.93 (0.69–1.24) 0.86(0.68–1.07) 0.88 (0.72–1.09) 0.60 0.97
a

A Cox proportional hazards model was used and values are relative risk and 95% confidence intervals in parenthesis. Adjusted for BMI (<25, 25–<30, or ≥30, kg/m2), pack-years of smoking before age 30 (continuous, pack-years), family history of colorectal cancer (yes or no), history of sigmoidoscopy/colonoscopy (yes or no), physical activity (quintiles, MET-hrs/wk), aspirin use (yes or no), postmenopausal hormone use (premenopausal, never, past, or current; NHS only), intake of total calorie (quintiles, Kcal/day), alcohol (<5, 5–<10, 10–<15, 15–<30, or ≥30, g/day), red meat (quintiles, serving/day), dietary calcium (quintiles, mg/day), dietary folate (quintiles, μg/day), and dietary vitamin D (quintiles, IU/day); age in months and year of questionnaire return were included as stratification variables.

b

Two sided; calculated by using Wald’s test statistic

c

Two sided; calculated by using the Q test statistic

Total vitamin B2 intake was not significantly associated with any specific anatomic subsite of CRC (Table 4). Intakes of alcohol, folate or calcium, multivitamin use, smoking status, calcium intake, or family history of CRC also did not significantly modify the association observed between total vitamin B2 intake and risk of CRC (p-interaction ≥ 0.07) (Table 5).

Table 4.

Multivariate adjusted relative risk (RR)* and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) of anatomic subsite of colorectal cancer according to quintiles of energy-adjusted total vitamin B2 intake in the Nurses’ Health Study (NHS) and Health Professionals Follow-up Study (HPFS)a

Quintiles of total vitamin B2 intake P-trendb P-between-studies heterogeneity for the highest categoryc
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5
Proximal colon cancer
 No. of cases (NHS/HPFS) 193/52 173/71 201/72 174/64 157/60
 NHS 1 (reference) 0.87 (0.69–1.08) 1.05 (0.83–1.32) 0.93 (0.73–1.19) 0.87 (0.67–1.12) 0.20
 HPFS 1 (reference) 1.11 (0.75–1.64) 1.03 (0.67–1.58) 0.87 (0.55–1.37) 0.90 (0.57–1.42) 0.44
 Pooled 1 (reference) 0.93 (0.75–1.14) 1.04 (0.85–1.28) 0.92 (0.74–1.14) 0.87 (0.70–1.09) 0.14 0.90
Distal colon cancer
 No. of cases (NHS/HPFS) 98/66 106/63 122/44 85/53 95/68
 NHS 1 (reference) 1.18 (0.88–1.59) 1.47 (1.07–2.02) 1.04 (0.74–1.47) 1.24 (0.89–1.75) 0.78
 HPFS 1 (reference) 1.02 (0.70–1.49) 0.72 (0.46–1.13) 0.82 (0.52–1.29) 1.14 (0.74–1.76) 0.09
 Pooled 1 (reference) 1.12 (0.88–1.41) 1.05 (0.52–2.11) 0.95 (0.72–1.26) 1.20 (0.92–1.57) 0.21 0.75

Rectal cancer
 No. of cases (NHS/HPFS) 98/43 81/36 79/45 88/32 64/44
 NHS 1 (reference) 0.93 (0.67–1.28) 0.94 (0.66–1.33) 1.07 (0.75–1.52) 0.80 (0.55–1.17) 0.15
 HPFS 1 (reference) 0.67 (0.41–1.09) 0.76 (0.45–1.28) 0.57 (0.32–1.01) 0.82 (0.48–1.40) 0.41
 Pooled 1 (reference) 0.83 (0.61–1.12) 0.88 (0.66–1.18) 0.81 (0.44–1.49) 0.81 (0.59–1.10) 0.79 0.95
a

A Cox proportional hazards model was used and values are relative risk and 95% confidence intervals in parenthesis. Adjusted for BMI (<25, 25–<30, ≥30, kg/m2), pack-years of smoking before age 30 (continuous, pack-years), family history of colorectal cancer (yes or no), history of sigmoidoscopy/colonoscopy (yes or no), physical activity (quintiles, MET-hrs/wk), aspirin use (yes, no), postmenopausal hormone use (premenopausal, never, past, or current; NHS only), intake of total calorie (quintiles, Kcal/day), alcohol (<5, 5–<10, 10–<15, 15–<30, ≥30, g/day), red meat (quintiles, serving/day), dietary calcium (quintiles, mg/day), dietary folate (quintiles, μg/day), and dietary vitamin D (quintiles, IU/day) ; age in months and year of questionnaire return were included as stratification variables.

b

Two sided; calculated by using Wald’s test statistic

c

Two sided; calculated by using the Q test statistic

Table 5.

Pooled multivariate relative risk (RR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) of colorectal cancer according to quintiles of energy-adjusted total vitamin B2 intake stratified by alcohol consumption, folate intake, multivitamin use, smoking status, or calcium intakea

Quintiles of total vitamin B2 intake P-trendb P-between-studies heterogeneity for the highest category c P-interactiond
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5
Alcohol consumption
 Nondrinkers
  No. of cases (NHS/HPFS) 216/41 175/41 208/37 161/44 150/57
  RR (95% CIs) 1 (reference) 0.80 (0.65, 0.98) 0.76 (0.41–1.42) 0.80 (0.63–1.00) 0.82 (0.65–1.03) 0.84 0.58 0.07
 > 0–15 g/day
  No. of cases (NHS/HPFS) 185/84 206/109 203/92 174/76 154/72
  RR (95% CI) 1 (reference) 1.09 (0.91–1.31) 1.06 (0.83–1.35) 0.90 (0.64–1.27) 0.87 (0.66–1.13) 0.03 0.24
 ≥ 15 g/day
  No. of cases (NHS/HPFS) 54/72 48/46 48/56 58/51 53/69
  RR (95% CIs) 1 (reference) 0.98 (0.50–1.95) 1.13 (0.59–2.18) 1.22 (0.51–2.89) 1.33 (0.87–2.04) 0.04 0.18
Folate intake
 < 400 μg/day
  No. of cases (NHS/HPFS) 283/99 206/69 145/49 91/17 87/22
  RR (95% CIs) 1 (reference) 0.89 (0.70–1.14) 1.01 (0.82–1.24) 1.04 (0.77–1.39) 0.95 (0.75–1.21) 0.47 0.73 0.53
 ≥ 400 μg/day
  No. of cases (NHS/HPFS) 172/98 223/127 314/136 302/154 270/176
  RR (95% CIs) 1 (reference) 0.94 (0.79–1.11) 0.91 (0.66–1.26) 0.82 (0.68–0.99) 0.86 (0.72–1.03) 0.73 0.85
Multivitamin use
 Ever
  No. of cases (NHS/HPFS) 206/88 266.109 369/137 382/160 349/196
  RR (95% CIs) 1 (reference) 0.88 (0.75–1.04) 0.88 (0.63–1.23) 0.82 (0.60–1.12) 0.88 (0.75–1.04) 0.97 0.83 0.38
 Never
  No. of cases (NHS/HPFS) 249/107 163/87 90/47 11/11 8/2
  RR (95% CIs) 1 (reference) 1.02 (0.84–1.23) 1.18 (0.90–1.54) 1.05 (0.64–1.74) 0.75 (0.38–1.45) 0.45 0.77
Smoking status
 Ever
  No. of cases (NHS/HPFS) 280/120 261/103 274/113 247/101 214/122
  RR (95% CIs) 1 (reference) 0.97 (0.76–1.23) 1.08 (0.81–1.44) 0.95 (0.68–1.34) 1.03 (0.86–1.22) 0.77 0.65 0.58
 Never
  No. of cases (NHS/HPFS) 175/68 168/88 184/68 146/66 141/69
  RR (95% CIs) 1 (reference) 0.92 (0.76–1.12) 0.86 (0.58–1.28) 0.80 (0.64–1.01) 0.80 (0.64–1.01) 0.12 0.42
Calcium intake
 < 1000mg/day
  No. of cases (NHS/HPFS) 383/190 283/160 210/103 150/88 134/94
  RR (95% CIs) 1 (reference) 0.94 (0.82–1.08) 0.93 (0.64–1.35) 0.86 (0.65–1.15) 0.99 (0.83–1.18) 0.73 0.57 0.57
 ≥ 1000mg/day
  No. of cases (NHS/HPFS) 72/6 146/34 249/82 243/83 223/104
  RR (95% CIs) 1 (reference) 1.04 (0.79–1.38) 1.12 (0.85–1.46) 0.99 (0.75–1.30) 0.90 (0.69–1.19) 0.74 0.57
Family history of colorectal cancer
 Yes
  No. of cases (NHS/HPFS) 91/35 80/39 94/33 81/33 82/33
  RR (95% CIs) 1 (reference) 0.96 (0.72–1.28) 1.08 (0.80–1.47) 0.98 (0.70–1.35) 1.07 (0.77–1.48) 0.73 0.61 0.29
 No
  No. of cases (NHS/HPFS) 364/161 349/155 365/152 312/138 275/165
  RR (95% CIs) 1 (reference) 0.94 (0.78–1.13) 0.95 (0.65–1.39) 0.86 (0.63–1.18) 0.92 (0.79–1.07) 0.91 0.95
a

A Cox proportional hazards model was used and values are relative risk and 95% confidence intervals in parenthesis. Adjusted for BMI (<25, 25–<30, ≥30, kg/m2), pack-years of smoking before age 30 (continuous, pack-years), family history of colorectal cancer (yes or no), history of sigmoidoscopy/colonoscopy (yes or no), physical activity (quintiles, MET-hrs/wk), aspirin use (yes, no), postmenopausal hormone use (premenopausal, never, past, or current; NHS only), intake of total calorie (quintiles, Kcal/day), alcohol (<5, 5–<10, 10–<15, 15–<30, ≥30, g/day), red meat (quintiles, serving/day), dietary calcium (quintiles, mg/day), dietary folate (quintiles, μg/day), and dietary vitamin D (quintiles, IU/day); age in months and year of questionnaire return were included as stratification variables.

b

Two sided; calculated by using Wald’s test statistic

c

Two sided; calculated by using the Q test statistic

d

P-interaction values were calculated by using Wald’s test.

In our sensitivity analyses, restricting analyses to non-users of multivitamins or excluding cases diagnosed within the first two years of follow-up did not change our main results (data not shown). Additional adjustment for intakes of fruits and vegetables, race, multivitamin use (yes or no), or other one-carbon nutrients such as methionine, vitamin B6, choline, vitamin B12, and betaine in multivariate models also yielded similar results (data not shown).

Discussion

We found that total vitamin B2 intake was not associated with overall CRC risk. This association was not modified by timing of intake and cancer subsites, although there was some suggestion of inverse association with longer time lag. There was no significant interaction with alcohol consumption, folate intake, calcium intake, smoking status, family history of CRC, or multivitamin use for CRC risk.

In this study, dietary, supplemental, and total vitamin B2 intakes were not significantly associated with overall risk of CRC. Our largely null results using cumulative updated vitamin B2 intake are not accordance with the findings of a recent meta-analysis which found a significantly lower CRC risk with high vitamin B2 intake (pooled OR=0.83 [95% CI: 0.75–0.91])18. However, our results were statistically significant in age-adjusted analysis, and these significant results were attenuated in multivariate analysis after adjusting for multiple dietary factors including intakes of alcohol, calcium, folate, and red meat. The studies included in the meta-analysis had a limited adjustment of these dietary factors and thus might have suffered some residual confounding due to these factors. Nonetheless, the inverse association reported in the meta-analysis was similar to our result using baseline vitamin B2 intake (pooled RR=0.87 [95% CI: 0.76–1.00]).

For participants in NHS and HPFS, median total vitamin B2 intakes were 3.2 mg/d for men and 3.0 mg/d for women. Considering that recommended dietary allowance (RDA) of vitamin B2 are 1.3 mg/d for men and 1.1 mg/d for women, our participants’ vitamin B2 intakes were high; even individuals in our lowest quintile consumed in excess of the RDA. Although there is a possibility of measurement error in diet assessment, this information suggests that our cohort consist of a well-nourished study population. Furthermore, the ranges of vitamin B2 intake and median values of vitamin B2 intake in lowest quantiles in the studies included in the meta-analysis except for Shanghai Women’s Health Study4, in which vitamin B2 intake was relatively lower than those in our study, were comparable to ours18. Therefore, the differences in the level of intake could not explain the differences of the results between the meta-analysis and ours. Among sources of vitamin B2 intake, dairy products (e.g., whole milk, skim milk, and yogurt) accounted for 8.1% of intake in NHS and 7.6% in HPFS. Breakfast cereals accounted for 3.4% for NHS and 3.8% for HPFS. Our non-significant associations of vitamin B2 with CRC risk might be due to the fact that most of our study participants had already achieved potentially protective levels of vitamin B2; nonetheless, risk estimates were relatively flat even when comparing individual in higher deciles to those in the lowest decile of vitamin B2 intake. Other nutrient profiles within the main food sources of vitamin B2 might also have contributed to our result. Future large studies including populations with lower vitamin B2 intake or vitamin B2 status are warranted.

Alternatively, since excess vitamin B2 is excreted primarily in the urine and very little is stored in the body, higher intakes (more than RDA) may not reflect the actual bioavailable vitamin B2. Few studies have evaluated possible associations between the risk of CRC and plasma levels of riboflavin or flavin mononucleotide (FMN)37, 38 and results were inconsistent. The European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study indicated that higher plasma levels of vitamin B2 were inversely associated with CRC (highest to lowest quintiles RR=0.71[95% CI:0.56–0.91], p-trend=0.02)37. However, the Alpha-Tocopherol, Beta-Carotene Cancer Prevention Study cohort reported that serum riboflavin was unrelated to CRC risk38. Future evaluations of a possible association between circulating levels of vitamin B2 and risk of CRC are needed.

To our knowledge, our study is the first prospective cohort study to examine vitamin B2 intake with varying lag-time in relation to CRC risk. We observed no significant association between intake of total vitamin B2 and risk of CRC by the lag-time between intake and diagnosis, although there was some suggestion of inverse association with longer lag time. Most previous cohort studies2, 47, 20 examined the associations between baseline intakes of vitamin B2 and CRC risk with varying years of follow-up (5.74 to 19 years) showed no associations2, 47, though not all20. Among those studies, the Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study2 had the longest years of follow-up (19 years). This study also reported that baseline dietary intake of vitamin B2 was not associated with risk of CRC2.

In our cohorts, folate intake in the remote past was more strongly inversely associated with risk of CRC21, but intake of vitamin B6 (which acts as a cofactor in the one-carbon metabolism) was not associated with CRC regardless of latency23. The co-factors in the one-carbon metabolism such as vitamin B2 and vitamin B6 might be weakly associated with risk of CRC compared to folate.

Although the results were not statistically significant, our study showed lower risk of CRC associated with greater intake of baseline total vitamin B2. Vitamin B2 intake might be important in the initiation of colorectal carcinogenesis39. Findings regarding the effects of timing and duration of vitamin intake on CRC are inconclusive and warrant more research.

The results of studies examining possible interactions of alcohol intake with vitamin B2 for risk of CRC are inconsistent. The WHI-OS20, a prospective cohort study among postmenopausal women, found that higher total vitamin B2 intake was significantly associated with 43% lower risk of CRC among current drinkers who consumed <13g of alcohol per week. This partly disagrees with the results from the EPIC study, which showed a stronger inverse association for CRC with serum vitamin B2 among individuals with alcohol consumption ≥30 g/d37. However, other two cohort2, 6 and two case-control studies9, 17 showed no interaction between vitamin B2 and alcohol intake. We also did not observe a significant interaction by alcohol consumption (p-interaction=0.07). It is not clear whether vitamin B2 intake mitigates disturbances in the one-carbon metabolism by alcohol intake; furthermore, the threshold of alcohol intake that can be nullified by vitamin B2 remains unclear.

Vitamin B2 is closely related to folate and the effect of vitamin B2 in modulating the bioavailability of methyl groups might vary according to the folate status and genotype of MTHFR40. We found that an association between vitamin B2 and risk of CRC was not significantly modified by folate intake. This is consistent with previous results from one case-control9 and three cohort studies2, 4, 20. On the other hand, the EPIC study37 showed that the association between plasma vitamin B2 and CRC was modified by folate status (p-interaction = 0.03). Of interest are two case-control studies that suggested a protective effect of an interaction between vitamin B2 and the TT variant of the MTHFR C677T polymorphism to reduce the risk of CRC12, 41. In light of results suggesting a modulating effect of MTHFR C677T polymorphism and considerable ethnic variations in the frequency of the MTHFR C677T genotype42, a large collaborative cohort study is warranted to evaluate an association between vitamin B2 intake and risk of CRC by genetic polymorphism of MTHFR.

We did not observe site-specific differences in the association of vitamin B2 intake with CRC; however, several previous studies2, 6, 37 showed that the association of vitamin B2 with CRC was stronger for colon cancer than for rectal cancer. Nevertheless, it is unclear whether vitamin B2 is more clearly associated with CRC in specific anatomical subsites as well as whether lower intake of vitamin B2 might render the colonic mucosa more sensitive to impairment of DNA methylation.

The present study has several strengths. To our knowledge, our study is the largest prospective cohort study that examined vitamin B2 intake and CRC. The repeated assessment of diet during follow-up allowed us to estimate the long-term intake of vitamin B2 during follow-up as well as intakes with various lag-time periods before diagnosis of CRC. In addition, with detailed information on diet and lifestyle factors, we were able to finely adjust for potential confounding factors for CRC.

There are also limitations to our study. First, given the relatively high intakes of vitamin B2 as well as the high proportion of users of multivitamins containing vitamin B2 in our cohorts (39.4% for men and 38.1% for women), our study population was already well-nourished with the vitamin, which could have masked the effect of dietary B2 intake on CRC risk. However, the distribution of total vitamin B2 intake in our study was similar to that in a study of nationally representative sample of US population43. Examining associations among non-users of multivitamins and adjusting for multivitamin use also did not change our results. Second, we could not examine the effects of vitamin B2 intake in early life (i.e., childhood, adolescence, or early adulthood), which might be important in colorectal carcinogenesis. Third, we had limited power for interaction analyses. Fourth, although majority of our study population were White, it is currently unknown if association between vitamin B2 intake and risk of CRC varies by ethnicity. Fifth, we cannot rule out residual confounding, although additionally adjusting for other one-carbon nutrients such as methionine, vitamin B6, choline, vitamin B12, or betaine in multivariate models, did not change our results.

In conclusion, this prospective study indicates that intake of total vitamin B2 is not associated with overall CRC risk. The association between vitamin B2 intake and CRC risk was not modified by timing of intake during adulthood, cancer subsites, or other CRC-related nutrient intakes. Further studies that evaluate the role of plasma levels of vitamin B2 and early-life vitamin B2 intake and their interaction with genetic variants within one-carbon metabolism on CRC risk are warranted.

What’s New.

Vitamin B2 serves as a cofactor to enhance one-carbon metabolism, maintain mucous membranes, and has been implicated in lowering CRC risk. Here we observed that total vitamin B2 intake was not associated with CRC risk. The association was not modified by timing of vitamin B2 intake during adulthood, cancer subsites, or other CRC-related nutrient intakes. Our prospective data do not support a beneficial role of vitamin B2 intake in lowering incidence of CRC.

Acknowledgments

Funding

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (P01 CA87969, P01 CA55075, UM1 CA186107, UM1 CA167552, R01 CA151993, RO1 CA136950, and R35 CA197735) and by a grant from Research year of Inje University in 2014–2015 (20140191). The funders had no role in design or conduct of the study; the collection, analysis, or interpretation of the data; the preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript.

Author contributions were as follows; EC and SJ planned study design; SJ and SO collected data; SJ and XZ performed statistical analysis. YSY wrote manuscript. EC, SO, ELG, XZ, and SJ provided critical revision of the manuscript. All authors contributed to the data interpretation, editing, and reviewing and approved the final manuscript.

We would like to thank the participants and staff of the NHS and the HPFS for their valuable contributions as well as the following state cancer registries for their help: AL, AZ, AR, CA, CO, CT, DE, FL, GA, ID, IL, IN, IA, KY, LA, ME, MD, MA, MI, NE, NH, NJ, NY, NC, ND, OH, OK, OR, PA, RI, SC, TN, TX, VA, WA, WY. The authors assume full responsibility for analyses and interpretation of these data.

Abbreviations

BMI

body mass index

CRC

colorectal cancer

MET-h

metabolic equivalent task hours

RR

relative risk

CI

95% confidence interval

Footnotes

Disclosure

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  • 1.Powers HJ. Riboflavin (vitamin B-2) and health. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003;77:1352–60. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/77.6.1352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bassett JK, Severi G, Hodge AM, Baglietto L, Hopper JL, English DR, Giles GG. Dietary intake of B vitamins and methionine and colorectal cancer risk. Nutr Cancer. 2013;65:659–67. doi: 10.1080/01635581.2013.789114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Key TJ, Appleby PN, Masset G, Brunner EJ, Cade JE, Greenwood DC, Stephen AM, Kuh D, Bhaniani A, Powell N, Khaw KT. Vitamins, minerals, essential fatty acids and colorectal cancer risk in the United Kingdom Dietary Cohort Consortium. International journal of cancer Journal international du cancer. 2012;131:E320–5. doi: 10.1002/ijc.27386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Shrubsole MJ, Yang G, Gao YT, Chow WH, Shu XO, Cai Q, Rothman N, Gao J, Wagner C, Zheng W. Dietary B vitamin and methionine intakes and plasma folate are not associated with colorectal cancer risk in Chinese women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009;18:1003–6. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-1200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kabat GC, Miller AB, Jain M, Rohan TE. Dietary intake of selected B vitamins in relation to risk of major cancers in women. Br J Cancer. 2008;99:816–21. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.de Vogel S, Dindore V, van Engeland M, Goldbohm RA, van den Brandt PA, Weijenberg MP. Dietary folate, methionine, riboflavin, and vitamin B-6 and risk of sporadic colorectal cancer. J Nutr. 2008;138:2372–8. doi: 10.3945/jn.108.091157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Shin A, Li H, Shu XO, Yang G, Gao YT, Zheng W. Dietary intake of calcium, fiber and other micronutrients in relation to colorectal cancer risk: Results from the Shanghai Women’s Health Study. Int J Cancer. 2006;119:2938–42. doi: 10.1002/ijc.22196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.de Vogel S, Bongaerts BW, Wouters KA, Kester AD, Schouten LJ, de Goeij AF, de Bruine AP, Goldbohm RA, van den Brandt PA, van Engeland M, Weijenberg MP. Associations of dietary methyl donor intake with MLH1 promoter hypermethylation and related molecular phenotypes in sporadic colorectal cancer. Carcinogenesis. 2008;29:1765–73. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgn074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sharp L, Little J, Brockton NT, Cotton SC, Masson LF, Haites NE, Cassidy J. Polymorphisms in the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene, intakes of folate and related B vitamins and colorectal cancer: a case-control study in a population with relatively low folate intake. Br J Nutr. 2008;99:379–89. doi: 10.1017/S0007114507801073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Murtaugh MA, Curtin K, Sweeney C, Wolff RK, Holubkov R, Caan BJ, Slattery ML. Dietary intake of folate and co-factors in folate metabolism, MTHFR polymorphisms, and reduced rectal cancer. Cancer Causes Control. 2007;18:153–63. doi: 10.1007/s10552-006-0099-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Otani T, Iwasaki M, Hanaoka T, Kobayashi M, Ishihara J, Natsukawa S, Shaura K, Koizumi Y, Kasuga Y, Yoshimura K, Yoshida T, Tsugane S. Folate, vitamin B6, vitamin B12, and vitamin B2 intake, genetic polymorphisms of related enzymes, and risk of colorectal cancer in a hospital-based case-control study in Japan. Nutr Cancer. 2005;53:42–50. doi: 10.1207/s15327914nc5301_5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Le Marchand L, Donlon T, Hankin JH, Kolonel LN, Wilkens LR, Seifried A. B-vitamin intake, metabolic genes, and colorectal cancer risk (United States) Cancer Causes Control. 2002;13:239–48. doi: 10.1023/a:1015057614870. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.La Vecchia C, Braga C, Negri E, Franceschi S, Russo A, Conti E, Falcini F, Giacosa A, Montella M, Decarli A. Intake of selected micronutrients and risk of colorectal cancer. Int J Cancer. 1997;73:525–30. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0215(19971114)73:4<525::aid-ijc12>3.0.co;2-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.van Lee L, Heyworth J, McNaughton S, Iacopetta B, Clayforth C, Fritschi L. Selected dietary micronutrients and the risk of right- and left-sided colorectal cancers: a case-control study in Western Australia. Ann Epidemiol. 2011;21:170–7. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2010.10.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Sun Z, Zhu Y, Wang PP, Roebothan B, Zhao J, Dicks E, Cotterchio M, Buehler S, Campbell PT, McLaughlin JR, Parfrey PS. Reported intake of selected micronutrients and risk of colorectal cancer: results from a large population-based case-control study in Newfoundland, Labrador and Ontario, Canada. Anticancer Res. 2012;32:687–96. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Morita M, Yin G, Yoshimitsu S, Ohnaka K, Toyomura K, Kono S, Ueki T, Tanaka M, Kakeji Y, Maehara Y, Okamura T, Ikejiri K, et al. Folate-related nutrients, genetic polymorphisms, and colorectal cancer risk: the fukuoka colorectal cancer study. Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP. 2013;14:6249–56. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2013.14.11.6249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Jedrychowski W, Steindorf K, Popiela T, Wahrendorf J, Tobiasz-Adamczyk B, Kulig J, Penar A. Alcohol consumption and the risk of colorectal cancer at low levels of micronutrient intake. Med Sci Monit. 2002;8:CR357–63. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Liu Y, Yu QY, Zhu ZL, Tang PY, Li K. Vitamin b2 intake and the risk of colorectal cancer: a meta- analysis of observational studies. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16:909–13. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2015.16.3.909. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Liu Y, Yu Q, Zhu Z, Zhang J, Chen M, Tang P, Li K. Vitamin and multiple-vitamin supplement intake and incidence of colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Med Oncol. 2015;32:434. doi: 10.1007/s12032-014-0434-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Zschabitz S, Cheng TY, Neuhouser ML, Zheng Y, Ray RM, Miller JW, Song X, Maneval DR, Beresford SA, Lane D, Shikany JM, Ulrich CM. B vitamin intakes and incidence of colorectal cancer: results from the Women’s Health Initiative Observational Study cohort. Am J Clin Nutr. 2013;97:332–43. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.112.034736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lee JE, Willett WC, Fuchs CS, Smith-Warner SA, Wu K, Ma J, Giovannucci E. Folate intake and risk of colorectal cancer and adenoma: modification by time. The American journal of clinical nutrition. 2011;93:817–25. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.110.007781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kruman II, Fowler AK. Impaired one carbon metabolism and DNA methylation in alcohol toxicity. J Neurochem. 2014;129:770–80. doi: 10.1111/jnc.12677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Zhang X, Lee JE, Ma J, Je Y, Wu K, Willett WC, Fuchs CS, Giovannucci EL. Prospective cohort studies of vitamin B-6 intake and colorectal cancer incidence: modification by time? The American journal of clinical nutrition. 2012;96:874–81. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.112.037267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Colditz GA, Hankinson SE. The Nurses’ Health Study: lifestyle and health among women. Nat Rev Cancer. 2005;5:388–96. doi: 10.1038/nrc1608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Rimm EB, Giovannucci EL, Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA, Litin LB, Willett WC. Reproducibility and validity of an expanded self-administered semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire among male health professionals. American journal of epidemiology. 1992;135:1114–26. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116211. discussion 27–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.US Department of Agriculture. Agricultural Handbook No. 8 Series. Washington, DC: Department of Agriculture, Government Printing Office; 1989. Composition of foods – raw, processed, and prepared, 1963–1988. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.US Department of Agriculture. USDA database for the choline content of common foods. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture; 2004. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Feskanich D, Rimm EB, Giovannucci EL, Colditz GA, Stampfer MJ, Litin LB, Willett WC. Reproducibility and validity of food intake measurements from a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire. Journal of the American Dietetic Association. 1993;93:790–6. doi: 10.1016/0002-8223(93)91754-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Willett WC, Sampson L, Stampfer MJ, Rosner B, Bain C, Witschi J, Hennekens CH, Speizer FE. Reproducibility and validity of a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire. American journal of epidemiology. 1985;122:51–65. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Jung S, Je Y, Giovannucci EL, Rosner B, Ogino S, Cho E. Derivation and validation of homocysteine score in u.s. Men and women. The Journal of nutrition. 2015;145:96–104. doi: 10.3945/jn.114.192716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Willett W, Stampfer MJ. Total energy intake: implications for epidemiologic analyses. American journal of epidemiology. 1986;124:17–27. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Stampfer MJ, Willett WC, Speizer FE, Dysert DC, Lipnick R, Rosner B, Hennekens CH. Test of the National Death Index. American journal of epidemiology. 1984;119:837–9. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hu FB, Stampfer MJ, Rimm E, Ascherio A, Rosner BA, Spiegelman D, Willett WC. Dietary fat and coronary heart disease: a comparison of approaches for adjusting for total energy intake and modeling repeated dietary measurements. American journal of epidemiology. 1999;149:531–40. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009849. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Laird NM, Ware JH. Random-effects models for longitudinal data. Biometrics. 1982;38:963–74. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986;7:177–88. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Hosmer DW. In: Applied logistic regression. 3. Hosmer David W, Jr, PhD, Lemeshow Stanley, PhD, Sturdivant Rodney X., PhD, editors. Wiley; 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Eussen SJ, Vollset SE, Hustad S, Midttun O, Meyer K, Fredriksen A, Ueland PM, Jenab M, Slimani N, Boffetta P, Overvad K, Thorlacius-Ussing O, et al. Plasma vitamins B2, B6, and B12, and related genetic variants as predictors of colorectal cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010;19:2549–61. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-0407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Weinstein SJ, Albanes D, Selhub J, Graubard B, Lim U, Taylor PR, Virtamo J, Stolzenberg-Solomon R. One-carbon metabolism biomarkers and risk of colon and rectal cancers. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008;17:3233–40. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.van der Pols JC, Bain C, Gunnell D, Smith GD, Frobisher C, Martin RM. Childhood dairy intake and adult cancer risk: 65-y follow-up of the Boyd Orr cohort. The American journal of clinical nutrition. 2007;86:1722–9. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/86.5.1722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Powers HJ. Interaction among folate, riboflavin, genotype, and cancer, with reference to colorectal and cervical cancer. The Journal of nutrition. 2005;135:2960S–6S. doi: 10.1093/jn/135.12.2960S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.van den Donk M, Buijsse B, van den Berg SW, Ocke MC, Harryvan JL, Nagengast FM, Kok FJ, Kampman E. Dietary intake of folate and riboflavin, MTHFR C677T genotype, and colorectal adenoma risk: a Dutch case-control study. Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology. 2005;14:1562–6. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-04-0419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Brockton NT. Localized depletion: the key to colorectal cancer risk mediated by MTHFR genotype and folate? Cancer causes & control : CCC. 2006;17:1005–16. doi: 10.1007/s10552-006-0051-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Fulgoni VL, 3rd, Keast DR, Bailey RL, Dwyer J. Foods, fortificants, and supplements: Where do Americans get their nutrients? The Journal of nutrition. 2011;141:1847–54. doi: 10.3945/jn.111.142257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES