Abstract
Among the macromolecular drug targets in neurodegenerative disorders, the neurotrophin brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and its high-affinity tropomyosin-related kinase receptor (TrkB) present strong interest for nanomedicine development aiming at neuronal and synaptic repair. Currently, BDNF is regarded as the neurotrophic factor of highest therapeutic significance. However, BDNF has delivery problems as a protein drug. The enhanced activation of the transcription factor CREB (cAMP response element-binding protein) has been evidenced to increase the BDNF gene expression and hence the production of endogenous BDNF. We assume that BDNF delivery by nanocarriers and mitochondrial protection may provide high potential for therapeutic amelioration of the neuroregenerative strategies. Beneficial therapeutic outcomes may be expected for synergistic dual or multi-drug action aiming at (i) neurotrophic protein regulation in the central and peripheral nervous systems, and (ii) diminishment of the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and the oxidative damage in mitochondria. Our research strategy is based on a nanoarchitectonics approach for the design of nanomedicine assemblies by hierarchical self-assembly. We explore nanoarchitectonics concepts in soft-matter nanotechnology towards preparation of biodegradable self-assembled lipid nanostructures for safe neuro-therapeutic applications of multi-target nanomedicines.
Keywords: BDNF delivery, neuroprotective lipid nanocarriers, neurotrophic factor, CREB, nanomedicine, macromolecular drugs, combination therapy
Introduction
Restorative therapies of neurological disorders require new technologies and strategies for neurorepair and stimulation of neurogenesis against aging. Neurodegenerative and neuropsychiatric disorders (amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), Alzheimer's (AD), Parkinson's (PD) and Huntington's (HD) diseases, Rett syndrome, multiple sclerosis, stroke, hearing disorder, anxiety, depression, bipolar disorder, epilepsy, schizophrenia, and addiction) are complex pathologies provoked by genetic mutations and environmental stressor conditions, which lead to neuronal loss and dysfunction (Re et al., 2012). Targeting of a single pathway mechanism in consequent therapies has often yielded insufficient regenerative outcome owing to the fact that the neurodegenerative diseases are multi-factorial and are caused by several risk factors (Liu et al., 2016). For example, the target mechanisms in AD include β-amyloid fibril formation, protein hyperphosphorylation (p-tau), neurotrophin deficiency, oxidative stress, mitochondrial damage and dysfunction, apolipoprotein E4 (ApoE4) genetic risk factor, impaired transcription and altered gene expression, disruptions in metal ion homeostasis, altered lipid metabolism, and neuroinflammation. Genetic mutations, neurotrophin deficiency, oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, altered mitochondrial morphology, mtDNA deletions, inflammation, and apoptosis appear to be risk factors for the pathogenesis of ALS and PD as well (Viral and Mira, 2016).
BDNF in Neuronal Regeneration
Macromolecular therapeutics (e.g., recombinant proteins, synthetic peptides, monoclonal antibodies, plasmid DNA, siRNA, and CRISPR/Cas 9 therapeutics) have considerable potential for use in neuroregenerative nanomedicine structure-based design (Angelov et al., 2017). The majority of them are expected to reach higher success rates in clinical development as compared to the conventional small organic molecule drugs. Among the macromolecular drug targets, the neurotrophin brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and its high-affinity tropomyosin-related kinase receptor (TrkB) present strong interest for nanomedicine improvement aiming at neuronal and synaptic repair (Géral et al., 2013). BDNF participates in the development and maintenance of neuronal populations through activation of the TrkB receptor signaling that is responsible for differentiation, proliferation, plasticity, growth, and survival of neurons in the central and peripheral nervous systems (Chao, 2003). This neurotrophin stimulates the process of neurogenesis. BDNF supports also the formation of developing excitatory and inhibitory synapses. Increased neurotrophin levels favour the strengthening of the existing synapses via long-term potentiation (Lu et al., 2013). Therefore, the protein BDNF is very important for the neuro-cognitive function. In addition, BDNF activates the translational machinery and stimulates de novo protein synthesis in neurons (Zhang et al., 2013).
The enhanced activation of the transcription factor cAMP response element-binding protein (CREB) has been evidenced to increase the BDNF gene expression and hence the production of endogenous BDNF (Guerzoni et al., 2017). In this context, the proteins BDNF and CREB may be considered as biomarkers for neuro-regeneration because they stimulate neurogenesis and favour the neuronal survival. Currently, BDNF is regarded as the neurotrophic factor of highest therapeutic significance. However, this protein drug has delivery problems (Géral et al., 2013). It requires more efficient delivery systems for its administration because of its short in vivo half-life and poor pharmacokinetic properties (Angelova et al., 2013).
The neurotrophin BDNF, along with its affinity for the TrkB receptor, can regulate processes in the mitochondrial organelles (Geisler et al., 2017). This crosstalk suggests that mitochondria may modulate the intracellular signaling, which controls the neurite growth towards neuro-regeneration. Indeed, BDNF has been shown to increase the brain mitochondrial respiratory coupling at complex I (Markham et al., 2004). On the other hand, the neurotrophin BDNF stimulates the mitochondrial biogenesis (Cheng et al., 2012). The developmental organization of the mitochondria in neurites during growth has been insufficiently studied so far. It has been hypothesized that mitochondrial dynamics regulates the neurite growth rate and guidance and that optimal mitochondrial dynamics supports enhanced neurite growth (Todorova et al., 2017).
Evidence exists that BDNF can control the mitochondrial transport and distribution at synapses, where high energy and Ca2+ ion buffering are required (Su et al., 2014). It has been shown that the delivery of BDNF for 15 minutes to hippocampal neurons decreases the percentage of moving mitochondria along the axons (Su et al., 2014). As a consequence, the BDNF-induced mitochondrial arrest provokes increased accumulation of mitochondria at presynaptic sites. The number of moving mitochondria along the axons is thus controlled through TrkB receptor-mediated downstream PI3K and phospholipase-Cγ signaling pathways. The accumulation of more mitochondria at presynaptic sites has favored the synaptic transmission (Su et al., 2014).
Nanotechnology for Neurodegenerative Disorders
The role of the mitochondrial transport in the BDNF-mediated synaptic transmission has not been exploited yet for development of anti-ALS, anti-AD, and anti-PD combination therapies. We assume that BDNF delivery and mitochondrial protection may provide high potential for therapeutic amelioration of the neurodegeneration processes. In this perspective, restoration of the neurotrophin levels should slow down and arrest the progression of the neurological disorders.
Figure 1 presents the concept of neuroregenerative therapy that promotes neuronal survival through combined nanodrug delivery and targeting of complementary signaling mechanisms. Beneficial therapeutic outcomes may be expected for synergistic dual or multi-drug action aiming at (i) neurotrophic protein regulation in the central and peripheral nervous systems (Figure 1 left panel), and (ii) diminishment of the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and the oxidative damage in mitochondria (Figure 1 right panel).
Due to the low bioavailability of the insoluble neuroprotective antioxidant compounds and the instability of the protein drugs (e.g., neurotrophin BDNF) that should be administered to treat severe neurological disorders, nanotechnology approaches for drug delivery have gained increasing recent interest (Ingallina et al., 2016). Nanoparticle formulations may significantly increase the concentration of the therapeutic agents at the target sites. The application of nanomedicine in neurology is still at early stage of development (Re et al., 2012). Neuro-nanomedicine development needs to consider the neurodegenerative diseases as network states, for which multimaterial systems for multicomponent drug delivery will be required. One possibility comes from the administration of multi-target hybrid neurotherapeutic molecules. In parallel, novel nanotechnologies reveal the next-generation candidate nanobuilding blocks for the design of multi-target nanomedicines to treat neurodegenerative disorders (Angelov et al., 2014). Taking into account the potential cross-talk between the involved biological intracellular signaling cascades, such smart nanoarchitectures may enable the dynamic modulation of target protein networks through co-delivery of genes and/or peptide drugs with small-molecular-weight substances acting through ligand-receptor binding, membrane receptor cross-activation or organelle-specific mechanisms.
Amphiphile Nanoarchitectonics Approach
Our research strategy is based on a nanoarchitectonics approach for the design of nanomedicine assemblies by hierarchical self-assembly (Angelova et al., 2015). We explore nanoarchitectonics concepts in soft-matter nanotechnology towards the development of biodegradable self-assembled lipid nanostructures and multifunctional material scaffolds for safe biomedical applications (Angelov et al., 2014). This strategy focuses on nanoformulation and delivery of therapeutic genes, proteins, and peptides, which do not cross the biological barriers and therefore could not exert their therapeutic potential in clinics yet.
Nanocarriers prepared by self-assembly of lyotropic lipids and amphiphilic molecules provide reservoirs for combined encapsulation of multiple bioactive molecules (Figure 2). Thus, the concept for synergistic or additive drug action upon nanoparticle-mediated co-delivery of therapeutic agents can be tested. The supramolecular organization of the nanoparticles and their internal structure, determined by the chosen amphiphilic composition, is crucial for the drug delivery outcome. Figure 2 shows two examples of lipid-based nanocarriers with different topologies that result from the self-assembly process underlying the nanoparticles preparation (Angelov et al., 2015).
We have recently demonstrated the advantage of combined drug delivery of a lipophilic phytochemical antioxidant compound (curcumin) and ω-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid DHA (docosahexaenoic acid) for stimulation of the BDNF-TrkB signaling pathway (Guerzoni et al., 2017). The neuritogenic properties of the nanoformulations have been investigated in vitro with human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells, which express the neurotrophin receptor TrkB upon differentiation. We have examined the BDNF biosynthesis in designed neuronal cell culture treatment schemes. Neurite outgrowth has been monitored as a criterion of arresting the induced neurodegeneration and reversing the process towards neuroregeneration. Synergistic effects of curcumin, DHA and BDNF have been efficient in preventing the neuronal damage via modulation of the TrkB receptor signaling towards promotion of neuronal cell survival, proliferation, and growth. The expression of the phosphorylated protein CREB, detected by the anti-phospho CREB (Ser133) monoclonal antibody in the intracellular domain of multi-drug treated SH-SY5Y cells, has been evidenced by flow cytometry for several therapeutic conditions. The sequential chronic treatment scheme has shown potential towards neuronal survival and neurorepair by multidrug formulations fulfilling the activities indicated in Figure 1. The obtained results have evidenced that neuronal cell proliferation, survival, and regeneration may be promoted through additive or synergistic effects exerted by the studied multi-drug compositions (Guerzoni et al., 2017).
In perspective, nanoparticle-based controlled release formulations may be investigated for their efficiency in the induction of neuroregeneration processes towards the repair of neuronal damage. To that aim, various technical challenges for fabrication of nanodelivery systems for macromolecular drugs need to be urgently addressed.
Footnotes
Funding: AA is supported by CNRS. BA is supported by the Czech Science Foundation Grant GACR 17-00973S and the projects ELI - Extreme Light Infrastructure – phase 2 (CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/15_008/0000162) and ELIBIO (CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/15_003/0000447) from the European Regional Development Fund.
Conflicts of interest: None declared.
Contributor agreement: A statement of “Publishing Agreement” has been signed by an authorized author on behalf of all authors prior to publication.
Plagiarism check: This paper has been checked twice with duplication-checking software iThenticate.
Peer review: A double-blind and stringent peer review process has been performed to ensure the integrity, quality and significance of this paper.
Copyedited by Jackson C, Li HF, Liu ZFSong LP, Liu WJ, Zhao M
References
- Angelov B, Angelova A, Drechsler M, Garamus VM, Mutafchieva R, Lesieur S. Identification of large channels in cationic PEGylated cubosome nanoparticles by synchrotron radiation SAXS and Cryo-TEM imaging. Soft Matter. 2015;11:3686–3692. doi: 10.1039/c5sm00169b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Angelov B, Angelova A, Filippov SK, Drechsler M, Štěpánek P, Lesieur S. Multicompartment lipid cubic nanoparticles with high protein upload: Millisecond dynamics of formation. ACS Nano. 2014;8:5216–5226. doi: 10.1021/nn5012946. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Angelov B, Garamus VM, Drechsler M, Angelova A. Structural analysis of nanoparticulate carriers for encapsulation of macromolecular drugs. J Mol Liq. 2017;235:83–89. [Google Scholar]
- Angelova A, Angelov B, Drechsler M, Lesieur S. Neurotrophin delivery using nanotechnology. Drug Discovery Today. 2013;18:1263–1271. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2013.07.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Angelova A, Angelov B, Mutafchieva R, Lesieur S. Biocompatible mesoporous and soft nanoarchitectures. J Inorg Organomet Polym. 2015;25:214–232. [Google Scholar]
- Chao MV. Neurotrophins and their receptors: a convergence point for many signalling pathways. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2003;4:299–309. doi: 10.1038/nrn1078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cheng A, Wan R, Yang JL, Kamimura N, Son TG, Ouyang X, Luo Y, Okun E, Mattson MP. Involvement of PGC-1α in the formation and maintenance of neuronal dendritic spines. Nat Commun. 2012;3:1250. doi: 10.1038/ncomms2238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Geisler JG, Marosi K, Halpern J, Mattson MP. DNP, mitochondrial uncoupling, and neuroprotection: A little dab’ll do ya. Alzheimers Dement. 2017;13:582–591. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2016.08.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Géral C, Angelova A, Lesieur S. From molecular to nanotechnology strategies for delivery of neurotrophins: emphasis on brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) Pharmaceutics. 2013;5:127–167. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics5010127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guerzoni LPB, Nicolas V, Angelova A. In vitro modulation of TrkB receptor signaling upon sequential delivery of curcumin-DHA loaded carriers towards promoting neuronal survival. Pharm Res. 2017;34:492–505. doi: 10.1007/s11095-016-2080-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ingallina C, Rinaldi F, Bogni A, Ponti J, Passeri D, Reggente M, Rossi M, Kinsner-Ovaskainen A, Mehn D, Rossi F, Botta B, Carafa M, Marianecci C. Niosomal approach to brain delivery: Development, characterization and in vitro toxicological studies. Int J Pharm. 2016;511:969–982. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2016.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu Y, An S, Li J, Kuang Y, He X, Guo Y, Ma H, Zhang Y, Ji B, Jiang C. Brain-targeted co-delivery of therapeutic gene and peptide by multifunctional nanoparticles in Alzheimer's disease mice. Biomaterials. 2016;80:33–45. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.11.060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lu B, Nagappan G, Guan X, Nathan PJ, Wren P. BDNF-based synaptic repair as a disease-modifying strategy for neurodegenerative diseases. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2013;14:401–416. doi: 10.1038/nrn3505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Markham A, Cameron I, Franklin P, Spedding M. BDNF increases rat brain mitochondrial respiratory coupling at complex I, but not complex II. Eur J Neurosci. 2004;20:1189–1196. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2004.03578.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Re F, Gregori Ma, Masserini M. Nanotechnology for neurodegenerative disorders. Nanomedicine. 2012;8:S51–58. doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2012.05.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Su B, Ji YS, Sun XL, Liu XH, Chen ZY. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF)-induced mitochondrial motility arrest and presynaptic docking contribute to BDNF-enhanced synaptic transmission. J Biol Chem. 2014;289:1213–1226. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.526129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Todorova V, Blokland A. Mitochondria and synaptic plasticity in the mature and aging nervous system. Curr Pharmacol. 2017;15:166–173. doi: 10.2174/1570159X14666160414111821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Viral M, Mira H. Regulation of neurogenesis by neurotrophins during adulthood: Expected and unexpected roles. Front Neurosci. 2016;10:26. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2016.00026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang G, Bowling H, Hom N, Kirshenbaum K, Klann E, Chao MV, Neubert TA. In-depth quantitative proteomic analysis of de novo protein synthesis induced by brain-derived neurotrophic factor. J Proteome Res. 2014;13:5707–5714. doi: 10.1021/pr5006982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]