Abstract
This study examined the effects of fish meal supplementation on spatial distribution of lipid microdomains and lateral mobility of prostaglandin F2α (FP) receptors on cell plasma membranes of the bovine corpus luteum (CL). Beef cows were stratified by BW and randomly assigned to receive a corn gluten meal supplement (n = 4) or fish meal supplement (n = 4) for 60 d to allow incorporation of fish meal derived omega-3 fatty acids into luteal tissue. Ovaries bearing the CL were surgically removed between days 10 to 12 post-estrus corresponding to approximately day 60 of supplementation. A 200 mg sample of luteal tissue was analyzed for fatty acid content using GLC. The remaining tissue was enzymatically digested with collagenase to dissociate individual cells from the tissue. Cells were cultured to determine effects of dietary supplementation on lipid microdomains and lateral mobility of FP receptors. Luteal tissue collected from fish meal supplemented cows had increased omega-3 fatty acids content (P < 0.05). Lipid microdomain total fluorescent intensity was decreased in dissociated luteal cells from fish meal supplemented cows (P < 0.05). Micro and macro diffusion coefficients of FP receptors were greater for cells obtained from fish meal supplemented cows (P < 0.05). In addition, compartment diameter of domains was larger while resident time was shorter for receptors from cells obtained from fish meal supplemented cows (P < 0.05). Data indicate that dietary supplementation with fish meal increases omega-3 fatty acid content in luteal tissue causing disruption of lipid microdomains. This disruption leads to increased lateral mobility of the FP receptor, increased compartment sizes, and decreased resident time which may influence prostaglandin signaling in the bovine CL.
Keywords: bovine, corpus luteum, omega-3 fatty acids, lipid microdomains, FP receptor
1. Introduction
Luteinizing hormone from the anterior pituitary gland causes the release of the ovum from the follicle and differentiation of the theca and granulosa cells into small and large luteal steroidogenic cells, respectively [1–3]. Luteal steroidogenic cells secrete progesterone which is essential for early pregnancy in mammals. In the non-pregnant cow, uterine prostaglandin (PG) F2α is released late in the estrous cycle in a series of 5 to 8 pulses, causing regression of the corpus luteum (CL) allowing for return to estrus [4–6]. Prostaglandin F2α (FP) receptors are heterotrimeric G-protein coupled receptors located on steroidogenic luteal cells of the CL [7]. Binding of PGF2α to its receptor triggers a complex intracellular signaling cascade to initiate regression of the CL. In the pregnant female, the conceptus inhibits uterine synthesis and release of PGF2α, preventing regression of the CL, allowing for continued secretion of progesterone, and establishment of pregnancy [8]. Loss of pregnancy can occur when a viable conceptus fails to adequately regulate PGF2α secretion, leading to regression of the CL [9, 10]. Therefore, diminishing or altering sensitivity of luteal cells to PGF2α may prevent regression of the CL during early pregnancy.
The plasma membrane of mammalian cells is composed of a lipid bilayer which is highly dynamic. It also contains unique regions called lipid microdomains, ranging in size from 10 to 200 nm in diameter that are high in cholesterol and sphingolipids [11, 12]. These domains are well-organized, which cluster to form larger, ordered platforms. The order, or spatial distribution of these domains, favor specific protein-protein interactions, resulting in the activation of signaling cascades [13]. There are two distinct lipid microdomain structures associated with plasma membranes – linear domains referred to as lipid rafts and invaginated domains referred to as caveolae. These microdomains have been postulated to regulate vesicle trafficking/sorting, endocytosis of membrane-bound proteins, cholesterol homeostasis, and serve as platforms to facilitate co-localization of intracellular signaling proteins during agonist-induced signal transduction [11]. Numerous studies have shown that ligand-bound membrane receptors often coalesce into lipid microdomains following addition of an agonist resulting in the activation of intracellular signaling pathways [14–16]. Additionally, the disruption of lipid microdomains, either by beta-methyl cyclodextrin (β-MCD) or inhibiting transcription of specific microdomain structural proteins, has been shown to exert major effects on G-protein coupled receptor signaling. This disruption has been reported to effect the localization, trafficking, and signaling of the G-alpha subunit [17]. Therefore, altering lipid microdomain structure on the plasma membrane of luteal cells may reduce PGF2α signaling in bovine CL.
Long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids such as omega-3 fatty acids can be incorporated into glycerophospholipids and increase membrane fluidity [18, 19]. Changes in membrane order or fluidity have been reported to affect ligand affinity and subsequent ion flux for the acetylcholine receptor [20]. In addition to altering membrane fluidity, these fatty acids have been reported to disrupt lipid microdomain composition, affect mobility of membrane-bound receptors, and decrease cell signaling [21–23]. We recently reported that inclusion of fish meal in the diet of non-lactating beef cows increased blood plasma [24–26] and luteal [26] content of omega-3 fatty acids. Therefore, it is hypothesized that omega-3 fatty acids in fish meal will incorporate into the plasma membrane of luteal cells altering lipid microdomains and lateral mobility of FP receptors in cells of the bovine CL. The objectives of the current study were to examine the effects of fish meal supplementation on 1) plasma and luteal omega-3 fatty acid composition, 2) organization and spatial distribution of lipid microdomains on cells of the bovine CL and 3) lateral mobility of the membrane-bound FP receptors.
2. Materials and methods
2.1 Animals and tissue collection
All animal procedures described herein were approved by the Colorado State University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (Approval # 13 - 4440A). Beef cows of mixed breeds were purchased at a local sale barn in Fort Collins, Colorado and housed at the Colorado State University Animal Reproduction Biotechnology Laboratory Foothills campus. Reproductive organs were palpated per rectum for presence of gross anatomical abnormalities (cystic follicles) and adhesions. Transrectal ultrasonography was performed on ovaries for presence of CL and uteri for absence of a fetus. Cows with adhesions, cystic follicles, absence of a CL, or pregnant were removed from the study.
Cows were stratified by BW and randomly assigned to receive corn gluten meal (n = 4; controls) or fish meal (n = 4; SeaLac, Omega Protein). Diets were delivered daily to cows at 2% BW on a dry matter intake basis that met or exceeded NRC requirements [27]. The ration consisted of 95% mixed hay and 5% pelleted supplement of either fish meal or corn gluten meal. Diets were formulated to be isocaloric and isonitrogenous (Tables 1 and 2) and cows were fed for approximately 60 d to allow for adequate time to incorporate omega-3 fatty acids into blood and reproductive tissues in the fish meal supplemented animals. Cows were housed in a dry lot and were individually penned (3.7 × 3.0 m) between 0600 and 1000 each day to receive supplements and hay. After consumption of rations, cows were then turned out to have ad libitum access to water. Body weights were collected weekly to monitor changes in weight and diets were adjusted as needed.
Table 1.
Chemical composition of mixed grass hay
| Dry matter intake, % | 95 |
| Chemical Analysis | |
| Crude Protein, % | 15.2 |
| Acid Detergent Fiber, % | 37.0 |
| Neutral Detergent Fiber, % | 56.7 |
| Water Soluble Carbohydrates, % | 8.7 |
| Simple Sugars, % | 5.3 |
| Starch, % | 1.0 |
| Non Fiber Carbohydrates, % | 11.1 |
| Crude Fat, % | 3.5 |
Table 2.
Ingredient, chemical composition, and long-chain fatty acid profile of supplements
| Item | Experimental Diet | |
|---|---|---|
| Corn Gluten Meal | Fish Meal | |
| Dry Matter Intake, % | 5 | 5 |
| Ingredient of Pelleted Supplement, % | ||
| Corn gluten meal | 59.3 | 0 |
| Fish meal | 0 | 60.0 |
| Wheat midds | 19.2 | 17.4 |
| Wheat – ground | 7.3 | 7.8 |
| Limestone | 7.4 | 7.4 |
| Molasses cane | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Salt | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| Soybean oil-mixer | 0.25 | 0.8 |
| Magox | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| Monocal 16 21 | 0.25 | 0.25 |
| Zinc sulfate | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Selenium | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Manganese sulfate | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Copper sulfate | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Vitamin A 30/3 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Ranch-o-dine | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| Vitamin E 125 | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| Vitamin D 0/30 | 0.02 | 0.01 |
| Chemical Analysis | ||
| Crude Protein, % | 39.8 | 40.1 |
| Undegradable Intake Protein, % | 33.7 | 34.2 |
| Degradable Intake Protein, % | 29.5 | 29.9 |
| Total Digestible Nutrients, % | 68.8 | 69.6 |
| Crude Fat, % | 3.0 | 3.5 |
| Fatty Acid Composition of Supplement, wt % | ||
| Palmitic Acid | 14.3 | 26.4 |
| Palmitoleic Acid | 1.5 | 8.7 |
| Stearic Acid | 17.8 | 4.6 |
| Oleic Acid | 38.8 | 12.5 |
| Linoleic Acid | 2.2 | 11.6 |
| Alpha-Linolenic Acid | 2.2 | 2.5 |
| Arachidonic Acid | <0.5 | 1.1 |
| Eicosapentaenoic Acid | <0.5 | 9.0 |
| Docosahexaenoic Acid | <0.5 | 8.9 |
Jugular blood samples were collected immediately before supplementation commenced and weekly thereafter to measure changes in plasma fatty acid composition. Samples were collected in 3-mL blood tubes containing 5.4 mg EDTA (BD Vacutainer, Becton and Dickson Co, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey, USA) and immediately placed on ice. Samples were centrifuged at 1500 × g for 15 min, after which plasma was then collected and stored at −80°C until GLC analysis.
Cows were administered 25 mg injections of PGF2α (Lutalyse, Pharmacia & Upjohn Co, MI, USA) on day 36 and 50 of the supplementation period to synchronize estrous cycles. Ovaries bearing the CL were surgically removed by standing flank procedure, as previously described [28] between days 10 to 12 post-estrus following the second PGF2α injection (approximately day 60 of the supplementation period). After collection, the ovary was placed in 1× sterile PBS and transported on ice to the laboratory at the University of Northern Colorado. Superficial sterilization of the ovary was performed by immersing into a 70% ethanol solution.
2.2 Cell preparation
Using sterile techniques under a laminar flow hood, the CL was removed from the ovary and a 200 mg sample of tissue was placed in a 1.7-mL micro centrifuge collection tube and stored at −80°C until GLC analysis. The remaining tissue was cut into 500 μm slices using a Stadie-Riggs microtome. Slices of tissue were placed into a 60-mm2 Petri dish containing Ca+2/Mg+2-free Hank’s balanced salt solution (HBSS) that was supplemented with 20 mM HEPES, 100 units/mL penicillin, 0.1 mg/mL streptomycin, and 0.25 mg/mL amphotericin B (pH = 7.34) until enzymatic digestion. Tissue was then placed in T-25 culture flasks containing 5 mL dissociation medium (HBSS supplemented with 2000 units type 1 collagenase per g of tissue and 0.1 % BSA). Flasks were incubated in a water bath at 37°C with agitation for 45 min. Following incubation, the suspension was removed and transferred to a sterile 15-mL conical tube. Cells were washed 3 × in 5 mL of sterile 1× PBS. In brief, cells were centrifuged at 500 × g for 5 min at 4°C, the supernatant was removed, and cell pellets were re-suspended in fresh 5 mL 1× PBS. Following the final wash, the cell pellet was re-suspended in 10 mL of Ham’s F12 culture medium, supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum, insulin-transferrin-selenium-supplement (51300044; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), 100 units/mL penicillin, 0.1 mg/mL streptomycin, and 0.25 mg/mL amphotericin B (pH = 7.34), and placed on ice. Fresh dissociation medium was added to the remaining undigested tissue and incubated with agitation for additional 45 min. Cells were collected, washed 3 × with PBS as above, and then combined with the previous sample. Viability of the cells was determined using trypan blue exclusion, and cell number was estimated using a hemocytometer. Viability of the cell populations was 96 ± 1.8%.
2.3 Cell culture
Cells were cultured in 35-mm round-bottom culture dishes with poly-D-lysine coated coverslips (MatTex Corporation, Calhoun GA, USA). To facilitate cellular adhesion to coverslips, biomatrix (BD matrigel matrix basement membrane, BD Biosciences MI, USA) was added to dishes immediately prior to addition of 5 × 104 viable cells/mL per manufacturer’s protocol. Cells were maintained under an atmosphere of humidified air and 5% CO2 at 37°C for approximately 12 h prior to lipid microdomain staining or FP receptor labeling.
2.4 Lipid microdomain staining and analysis
Five dishes were prepared from each CL for lipid microdomain analysis. Two dishes were chosen at random and treated for 1 h with 10 mM β-MCD to remove membrane cholesterol which leads to spatial disruption of microdomains, thus serving as a positive control. Lipid microdomains were labeled as previously described [29].
Cells were viewed using a Zeiss confocal microscope equipped with a 40× water immersion objective (1.2 N.A). A 555 nm laser was used to excite Alexa-555 fluorophore, and emission of light was collected between 560 to 1000 nm. Approximately 30 cells were randomly selected from each dish, and 1 μm slice images were generated from bottom to top of each cell. Three-dimensional images were generated, and whole cell fluorescent intensity was determined using ImageJ software. A total of 366, 80, 578 and 117 dissociated cells were analyzed from tissue collected from controls, controls treated with β-MCD, fish meal supplemented cows, and fish meal supplemented cows treated with β-MCD, receptively.
2.5 Prostaglandin FP receptor labeling, single particle tracking, and analysis
Receptors were prepared for single particle tracking experiments using biotinylated antibody as previously described [29]. Three to five dishes were prepared from each CL for single particle tracking. Biotin was conjugated to FP receptor rabbit polyclonal antibody (product no. 101802; Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, MI, USA) using a DSB-X biotin protein labeling kit (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) per manufacturer’s instructions. Experiments were conducted using a Zeiss confocal microscope equipped with a high-speed camera (Hamamatsu Photonics, Japan). Ultraviolet light was used to excite quantum dots and emission of light was collected at 605 nm. Images were collected using 100× oil objective (N.A. = 1.4) and acquisition image size of 512 × 512 pixel (33.3 μm × 33.3 μm). Individual receptors were recorded for 29 s (30 fps) for a total of 870 frames per video. Receptors containing a minimum of 10 s of recordings were used for the final analysis.
Video Spot Tracker v08.01 software (Computer Integrated Systems for Microcopy and Manipulation, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA) was used to generate individual receptor trajectories. The resolution was 0.07 μm/pixel, and the XY coordinates obtained in pixels from Spot Tracker were converted to μm2. Receptor trajectories were visualized by plotting XY coordinates using Excel software. Mean square displacement (MSD) for each trajectory was calculated using the equations reported by Daumas [30] and then plotted against time. Micro diffusion coefficient was determined from the slope of the fitted line equation at Δ0 time and Δ1 time. Macro diffusion coefficient was estimated from the slope of the fitted line through the entire MSD vs. time plot. A statistical variance model was used to calculate domain size and resident time as previously described [29]. In brief, a sliding window analysis was performed to determine the normalized variance in the position of the receptor within the time windows. Windows were then translated alongside of particle trajectories. The time of the inter-domain jumps were indicated by peaks and collected as n + 1. The average diameter of an individual domain and resident time was calculated as previously described [29, 31, 32]. A total of 122 and 104 receptor trajectories were analyzed from cells collected from control and fish meal supplemented cows, respectively.
2.6 Plasma, tissue, and supplement fatty acid analysis
Plasma (500 μL), luteal tissue (200 mg), or dietary supplement (100 mg) was added to a 16 × 100 mm reaction tube and freeze-dried for 24 h prior to methylation. Samples were covered and maintained in the dark to minimize light-induced oxidation of fatty acids. Fatty acids were methylated using direct methylation as previous described [26]. Long-chain fatty acid composition was determined using an Agilent 7890A Series GLC (Wilmington, DE) with a MS detector. The instrument was equipped with a 30-m × 0.20-mm (i.d.) fused silica capillary column (Supelcowax10; Supelco Inc., Bellefonte, PA, USA). The fatty acid methyl ester preparations were injected (1 μL) using the splitless mode. The carrier gas was helium and the oven temperature was programmed from an initial temperature of 140°C that was held for 10 min and then increased to a final temperature of 250°C at the rate of 2.5°C/min. The final temperature was held for 10 min for a total run time of 65 min. Chromatograms were generated with a computing integrator (ChemStation Plus Chromatograph Manager; Agilent Technologies, Boulder, CO, USA). Standard fatty acid methyl ester mixtures were used to calibrate the GLC system using reference standard GLC 68-D (Nu-Chek Prep, Inc. Waterville, MN, USA). Palmitic acid (16:0), palmitoleic acid (16:1), stearic acid (18:0), oleic acid (18:1), linoleic acid (18:2) α-linolenic acid (18:3), arachidonic acid (20:4), eicosapentaenoic acid (20:5), and docosahexaenoic acid (22:6) were identified by comparing the mass spectrometry analysis and relative retention times of fatty acid methyl ester peaks of samples with those of standards. These peaks were then calculated as normalized area percentages of fatty acids.
2.7 Statistical analysis
All data are reported as least square means ± standard error of the mean and significance was declared at P < 0.05. Effects of dietary supplementation on initial and ending BW, luteal fatty acid composition, lipid microdomain staining intensity, lateral mobility of FP receptors (micro and macro diffusion coefficients), domain sizes and resident time of receptors were analyzed using 1-way analysis of variance. The model included dietary supplementation, cow, and residual error as sources of variation. Cow was considered a random variable in the model. Calculations were made using the mixed model procedure of SAS and means were compared by t-tests using the PDIFF option of SAS. The effects of dietary supplementation on plasma fatty acid content was analyzed using 1-way analysis of variance with repeated measures. The statistical model included dietary supplementation, day, cow, supplementation × day, and residual error as sources of variation. Cow was considered a random variable in the model. Calculations were made in SAS using mixed modeling procedure and the repeated statement. A heterogeneous autoregressive covariance structure was used in the repeated model to account for heterogeneous variation among samples. Pre-planned pairwise t-test comparisons were used to determine differences using the PDIFF option of SAS.
3. Results
3.1 Changes in body weight
Initial BW was 463 ± 11.3 kg for control cows and 478 ± 11.3 kg for fish meal animals and did not differ (P > 0.05). All cows gained BW during the supplemental period. Likewise, ending body weight did not differ (P > 0.05) between supplementation groups and was 515 ± 18.1 kg for control cows and 521 ± 18.1 kg for fish meal supplemented animals.
3.2 Plasma and luteal fatty acid composition
There was no effect of dietary supplementation, day, or dietary supplementation × day on plasma fatty acid content of palmitic, palmitoleic, stearic, oleic or arachidonic acids (P > 0.10; data not shown). Plasma linoleic acid was greater in cows receiving control supplement as compared to cows receiving fish meal supplement (P < 0.05; data not shown). The effects of dietary supplementation on plasma omega-3 fatty acid composition during the supplemental period are shown in Figure 1. There was no effect of dietary supplementation, day, or dietary supplementation × day interaction on plasma α-linolenic (P > 0.05). However, there was an effect of dietary supplementation, day, and dietary supplementation × day interaction on plasma eicosapentaenoic and docosahexaenoic acids (P < 0.05). Plasma eicosapentaenoic or docosahexaenoic acid did not differ (P > 0.10) between controls or fish meal supplemented cows at the beginning of the experiment (day 0). However, cows supplemented with fish meal had higher plasma eicosapentaenoic acid starting at day 28 and docosahexaenoic acid starting at day 21 and both remained higher for the remainder of the supplemental period (P < 0.05).
Figure 1. Effects of dietary supplementation on relative composition of plasma omega-3 fatty acids.
Panel A: α-Linolenic acid; dietary supplementation (P > 0.05), day (P > 0.05), and dietary supplementation × day interaction (P > 0.05). Panel B: Eicosapentaenoic acid; dietary supplementation (P < 0.05), day (P < 0.05) and dietary supplementation × day interaction (P < 0.05). Panel C: Docosahexaenoic acid; dietary supplementation (P < 0.05), Day (P < 0.05) and dietary supplementation × day interaction (P < 0.05). #Significance differences within day of supplementation, P < 0.05. *Significance differences within day of supplementation, P < 0.001.
The effects of dietary supplementation on luteal fatty acid composition are shown in Figure 2. There was no effect of dietary supplementation on luteal content of palmitic, palmitoleic, stearic, oleic, linoleic, and arachidonic acids (P > 0.05). However, luteal content of α-linolenic, eicosapentaenoic, and docosahexaenoic acids were greater in tissue obtained from fish meal supplemented cows as compared to control cows (P < 0.05).
Figure 2. Effects of dietary supplementation on relative composition of luteal long-chain fatty acids.
Panel A: Relative composition (weight percent) of palmitic acid (16:0), palmitoleic acid (16:1), stearic acid (18:0), oleic acid (18:1), linoleic acid (18:2) and arachidonic acid (20:4). Panel B: Relative composition (weight percent) of luteal omega-3 fatty acids α-linolenic acid (18:3), eicosapentaenoic acid (20:5), and docosahexaenoic acid (22:6). *Significant difference within class of fatty acid; P < 0.05. Corn gluten meal supplemented animals (n = 4; open bars); fish meal supplemented animals (n = 4; solid bars).
3.3 Spatial distribution of lipid microdomains in dissociated luteal cells
Antibody cross-linking of monosialotetrahexosylganglioside (GM1) resulted in formation of distinct patches on the plasma membrane of live, non-fixed dissociated cells. Representative cells from tissue acquired from a control and a fish meal supplemented cow are shown in Figure 3. The spatial distribution of microdomains of cells obtained from fish meal supplemented cows were disrupted resulting in a 52% decrease in total cell fluorescent intensity as compared to cells obtained from controls (Fig. 3; P < 0.05). Cells were also treated with β-MCD to examine the effects of cholesterol on lipid microdomain structure in these cells. Regardless of source of tissue (control or fish meal supplemented animals), depletion of cholesterol by β-MCD resulted in reduced total cell fluorescent intensity when compared to untreated cells (P < 0.05). Cells from control animals that were depleted of cholesterol with β-MCD resulted in a 62% decrease in total cell fluorescent intensity; cells from fish meal supplemented cows that were depleted of cholesterol had a 56% reduction in total cell intensity (P < 0.05).
Figure 3. Effects of dietary supplementation on lipid microdomain structure on the plasma membrane of dissociated bovine luteal cells.
Panel A: Representative cell obtained from (A) corn gluten meal supplemented animal, (B) individual cell obtained from same corpus luteum of corn gluten meal supplemented animal and subsequently treated with 10 mM beta-methylcyclodextrin (β-MCD), (C) individual cell obtained from fish meal supplemented cow and, (D) individual cell obtained from same corpus luteum of fish meal supplemented animal and subsequently treated with β-MCD. Panel B: Mean total cell intensity for cells obtained from corn gluten meal cows (n = 4; n = 366 cells), cells from corn gluten meal cows and treated with β-MCD (n = 80 cells), cells from fish meal supplemented animals (n = 4 cows; n = 578 cells), and cells from fish meal supplemented animals and treated with β-MCD (n = 117 cells). *P < 0.05; corn gluten meal vs. fish meal; #P < 0.05; corn gluten meal vs. corn gluten meal treated with β-MCD, and fish meal vs. fish meal treated with β-MCD.
3.4 Lateral mobility of FP receptors on dissociated luteal cells
Representative FP receptor trajectories of cells from CL obtained from control and fish meal supplemented cows are shown in Figure 4. There was an effect of dietary supplementation on both micro and macro diffusion coefficients. Micro diffusion of FP receptors on cells obtained from fish meal supplemented animals was increased by 152% as compared to receptors on cells from controls (Fig. 5; P < 0.05). Furthermore, macro diffusion was increased by 178% in cells obtained from fish meal supplemented animals (Fig. 5; P < 0.05).
Figure 4. Prostaglandin F2α (FP) receptor trajectories.
Three individual FP receptor trajectories (A,B,C) on cell membranes obtained from a corn gluten meal supplemented cow and fish meal supplemented cow. The table shows calculated micro diffusion coefficient (Dmicro), macro diffusion coefficient (Dmacro), domain size, and residence time for each individual receptor.
Figure 5. Effects of dietary supplementation on lateral mobility of the prostaglandin F2α (FP) receptor.
Distribution of micro diffusion coefficient (A), macro diffusion coefficient (B), residence time (C), and microdomain diameter (D) of FP receptors in luteal tissue collected from corn gluten meal supplemented cows (n = 4; open bar; n = 122 receptors) or fish meal supplemented cows (n = 4; solid bar; n = 104 receptors). Diffusion coefficients were calculated using mean square displacement and domain size using sliding window variance (see Material and Methods). The inset in each panel shows the mean ± standard error of the mean (* P < 0.05).
Dietary supplementation affected diameter, also referred to as corals, of lipid microdomains. Domains associated with FP receptors were 2–fold larger for cells obtained from fish meal supplemented animals as compared to cells obtained from controls (Fig. 5; P < 0.05). Dietary supplementation also affected the time a receptor resided within a domain. Receptors of cells from CL obtained from cows supplemented with fish meal were retained for 22% less time in a domain as compared to receptors of cells from tissue obtained from controls (Fig. 5; P < 0.05).
4. Discussion
The present study was undertaken to examine the influence of dietary supplementation of fish meal on lipid microdomain structure and lateral mobility of FP receptors obtained from dissociated cells of the bovine CL. Inclusion of rumen-grade menhaden fish meal in the diet of beef and lactating dairy cows has been reported to improve pregnancy rates [33–35]. However, the mechanism by which fish meal improves pregnancy is still largely unknown. Many studies have been conducted that examine influences of fish meal on uterine PGF2α metabolism [25, 36, 37], but little work regarding CL function has been conducted. Menhaden fish meal contains approximately 11% crude fat with a high percentage of long-chain polyunsaturated omega-3 fatty acids, eicosapentaenoic and docosahexaenoic acid (Table 2). This class of fatty acids has been shown to affect lipid microdomain structure [22, 38] and lateral mobility of membrane-bound receptors [29]. However, to our knowledge, the influence of these fatty acids on lipid microdomains or receptor mobility have not been investigated with cells of the bovine CL in vivo.
Cows supplemented with fish meal had increased plasma and luteal eicosapentaenoic and docosahexaenoic fatty acids which is in agreement with previous studies from this [24–26] and another laboratory [39]. Nutrition, especially energy balance, can have a significant impact on follicular growth and subsequent CL function in beef and dairy cows [40–42]. However, cows in this study had similar gain in BW during the supplementation period and differences in plasma and luteal omega-3 fatty acid composition were due to changes in dietary fatty acids received from the supplementation and not attributed to plane of nutrition.
One of the objectives of this study was to examine the effects of dietary fish meal supplementation on lipid microdomain structure of dissociated cells of the CL. Lipid microdomains are microscopic regions ranging in size from 10 to 200 nm in diameter that are rich with cholesterol and sphingolipids, primarily sphingomyelin and GM1 [11]. These are well-organized domains, which cluster to form larger, ordered platforms to facilitate membrane trafficking (both endocytosis and exocytosis) and cell signaling. Binding of cholera toxin to GM1 followed by cross-linking with antibodies is a common approach that can be used to visualize microdomains on plasma membranes of cells [43]. In this study using live, non-fixed dissociated cells of the CL, lipid microdomains were detected as punctated patches on membranes from cells collected from both supplemented groups. Spatial distribution of microdomains on membranes of cells from tissue collected from fish meal supplemented animals were more dispersed (i.e., less clustering of GM1 on the plasma membrane) resulting in decreased total cell fluorescent intensity. Similar effects of omega-3 fatty acids on lipid microdomain structure have been reported for cells of the CL [29] and immune cells [22, 44, 45] treated with fish oil. Cholesterol also plays an important role in lipid microdomain integrity [46, 47]. Removal of cholesterol by culturing cells in the presence of β-MCD resulted in dispersion of these domains in cells from tissue collected from controls, which is in agreement with other studies [29, 46]. Likewise, cells obtained from fish meal supplemented cows, cultured in the presence of β-MCD, resulted in further disruption of microdomains. A limitation of this study was use of dissociated cells. The CL is glandular tissue composed of many cell types which include steroidogenic (large and small), endothelial, fibroblasts, pericytes, and immune [1–3]. Therefore, it was not possible to determine the specific cell type that was influenced by dietary supplementation in the current study. However, it was apparent that most all cells collected from fish meal supplemented animals had considerable disruption of lipid microdomains. Enrichment of specific populations of cell types of the CL and effects of omega-3 fatty acids on lipid microdomain structure is warranted in future studies.
A second objective of this study was to investigate the influence of fish meal supplementation on lateral mobility of FP receptors using single particle tracking. Micro and macro diffusion coefficients, domain size, and resident time of receptors on FP positive cells obtained from controls were within values reported in the literature for membrane-bound receptors using single particle tracking methodology [16, 48–54]. Here in, we show that altered mobility of FP receptors on the plasma membrane was associated with an increase in omega-3 fatty acids in bovine luteal tissue. Lateral mobility of the FP receptor, as determined by micro and macro diffusion, was increased in FP positive cells of tissue collected from cows supplemented with fish meal. Furthermore, the average time each receptor resided in a domain was decreased compared to receptors on cells obtained from controls. Likewise, increased domain sizes were observed in cells collected from fish meal supplemented animals which is consistent with a recent in vitro study from this laboratory showing fish oil increased domain size [29]. In the cow, FP receptors are expressed on the plasma membrane of steroidogenic (both large and small) [55, 56] and endothelial cells [7, 57]. Therefore, it was not possible to identify the specific cell type that expressed FP receptors in the current study and warrants additional investigation.
Results from this study clearly demonstrate that fish meal supplementation increases luteal omega-3 fatty acid content in bovine CL and has a dramatic impact on lipid microdomain structure and FP receptor mobility. The mechanisms by which these fatty acids alter membrane dynamics and lipid microdomain structure are largely unknown. As opposed to bulk lipids of the plasma membrane, a characteristic of sphingolipids in lipid microdomains is the increased unsaturated fatty acyl chains giving rise to a more quasi-liquid ordered state. However, glycerophospholipids within the plasma membrane have unsaturated or polyunsaturated fatty acid acyl chains and are loosely packed together in a quasi-liquid disordered fashion giving the membrane its fluid property [58–60]. Therefore, one mechanism is that eicosapentaenoic and docosahexaenoic fatty acids from dietary marine oils become esterified to glycerophospholipids and increase the quasi-liquid disorder of the plasma membrane, which in turn increases fluidity of the membrane and lateral mobility of the FP receptor.
Another possible mechanism is that incorporation of long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids into lipid microdomains of biological membranes and potentially alters protein distribution, protein-lipid association, and/or protein-protein interactions. Reports in the literature show polyunsaturated long-chain fatty acids including eicosapentaenoic and docosahexaenoic acids can be incorporated into sphingolipids and thereby influence the quasi-liquid state of the membrane lipid microdomain from ordered to more disorder [22, 38]. This disruption of quasi-liquid ordered state may displace membrane-bound receptors from lipid microdomains. Single particle tracking data from the current study show a reduction in resident times, supporting this hypothesis.
In conclusion, results from the present study show that inclusion of fish meal in the diet of cows affected CL membrane lipid microdomains and mobility of FP receptors, likely impacting membrane fluidity and microdomain structure. Alteration of lipid microdomain structure and mobility of FP receptors may reduce PGF2α signaling in the bovine CL. Reduction in PGF2α signaling within the CL in early pregnant females may improve fertility.
Highlights.
Dietary fish meal increases plasma and luteal cell omega-3 fatty acid content.
Dietary fish meal supplementation disrupts the spatial distribution of lipid microdomains.
Fish meal supplementation increases lateral mobility of the prostaglandin receptor.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the following individuals at the Colorado State University Animal Reproduction Biotechnology Laboratory: Rick Brandes, Gregory Harding and Amy Richardson for care of animals during this study, Zella Brinks for assistance with surgeries, and Dr. Thomas Hansen for input on experimental design. The authors also thank Kenneth Cochran and Chad Wangeline at the University of Northern Colorado Instrumentation and Fabrication Services for their assistance with GLC analysis and microscopy. The authors wish to thank Jim Stuart and Omega Protein, Inc. for their kind donation of SeaLac used in this study. Additionally, the authors thank Dr. Richard Hyslop (Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Northern Colorado) for critical review of this manuscript.
Footnotes
This project was supported by National Research Initiative Competitive Grant no. 2013-6715-20966 from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture to P.D.B and National Institutes of Health, Award Number R21CA175937 to B.G.B.
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References
- 1.O’Shea JD, Rodgers RJ, D’Occhio MJ. Cellular composition of the cyclic corpus luteum of the cow. J Reprod and Fertil. 1989;85:483–487. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0850483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Alila HW, Hansel W. Origin of different cell types in the bovine corpus luteum as characterized by specific monoclonal antibodies. Biol Reprod. 1984;31:1015–1025. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod31.5.1015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Fields MJ, Fields PA. Morphological characteristics of the bovine corpus luteum during the estrous cycle and pregnancy. Theriogenology. 1996;45:1295–1325. doi: 10.1016/0093-691x(96)00099-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Nancarrow CD, Buckmaster J, Chamley W, Cox RI, Cumming IA, Cummins L, Drinan JP, Findlay JK, Goding JR, Restall BJ, Schneider W, Thorburn GD. Hormonal changes around oestrus in the cow. J Reprod Fertil. 1973;32:320–321. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0320320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Peterson AJ, Fairclough RJ, Payne E, Smith JF. Hormonal changes around bovine luteolysis. Prostaglandins. 1975;10:675–684. doi: 10.1016/s0090-6980(75)80015-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Shirasuna K, Asaoka H, Acosta TJ, Wijayagunawardane MPB, Ohtani M, Hayashi K-G, Matsui M, Miyamoto A. Real-time dynamics of prostaglandin F2α release from uterus and corpus luteum during spontaneous luteolysis in the cow. Reproduction. 2004;128:189–195. doi: 10.1530/rep.1.00183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Mamluk R, Chen D, Greber Y, Davis JS, Meidan R. Characterization of messenger ribonucleic acid expression for prostaglandin F2 alpha and luteinizing hormone receptors in various bovine luteal cell types. Biol Reprod. 1998;58:849–856. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod58.3.849. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Imakawa K, Hansen TR, Malathy P-V, Anthony RV, Polites HG, Marotti KR, Roberts RM. Molecular cloning and characterization of complementary deoxyribonucleic acids corresponding to bovine trophoblast protein-1: A comparison with ovine trophoblast protein-1 and bovine interferon-αII. Mol Endocrinol. 1989;3:127–139. doi: 10.1210/mend-3-1-127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Diskin MG, Morris DG. Embryonic and early foetal losses in cattle and other ruminants. Reprod Dom Anim. 2008;43:260–267. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0531.2008.01171.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Mann GE, Lamming GE, Robinson RS, Wathes DC. The regulation of interferon-tau production and uterine hormone receptors during early pregnancy. J Reprod Fertil Suppl. 1999;54:317–328. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Pike LJ. Rafts defined: a report on the Keystone symposium on lipid rafts and cell function. J Lipid Res. 2006;47:1597–1598. doi: 10.1194/jlr.E600002-JLR200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Thorn H, Stenkula KG, Karlsson M, Örtegren U, Nystrom FH, Gustavsson J, Strålfors P. Cell surface orifices of caveolae and localization of caveolin to the necks of caveolae in adipocytes. Mol Biol Cell. 2003;14:3967–3976. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E03-01-0050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Simons K, Toomre D. Lipid rafts and signal transduction. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2000;1:31–39. doi: 10.1038/35036052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Zacharias DA, Violin JD, Newton AC, Tsien RY. Partitioning of lipid-modified monomeric GFPs into membrane microdomains of live cells. Science. 2002;296:913–916. doi: 10.1126/science.1068539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Allen JA, Halverson-Tamboli RA, Rasenick MM. Lipid raft microdomains and neurotransmitter signalling. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007;8:128–140. doi: 10.1038/nrn2059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Douglass AD, Vale RD. Single-molecule microscopy reveals plasma membrane microdomains created by protein-protein networks that exclude or trap signaling molecules in T Cells. Cell. 2005;121:937–950. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.04.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Allen JA, Jiang ZY, Dave RH, Bhatnagar A, Roth BL, Rasenick MM. Caveolin-1 and lipid microdomains regulate Gs trafficking and attenuate Gs/adenylyl cyclase signaling. Mol Pharmacol. 2009;76:1082–1093. doi: 10.1124/mol.109.060160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Stubbs CD, Smith AD. The modification of mammalian membrane polyunsaturated fatty acid composition in relation to membrane fluidity and function. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Rev Biomembranes. 1984;779:89–137. doi: 10.1016/0304-4157(84)90005-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Alexander JW. Immunonutrition: the role of ω-3 fatty acids. Nutrition. 1998;14:627–633. doi: 10.1016/s0899-9007(98)00004-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Fong TM, McNamee MG. Correlation between acetylcholine receptor function and structural properties of membranes. Biochemistry. 1986;25:830–840. doi: 10.1021/bi00352a015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Stulnig TM, Berger M, Sigmund T, Raederstorff D, Stockinger H, Waldhäusl W. Polyunsaturated fatty acids inhibit T cell signal transduction by modification of detergent-insoluble membrane domains. J Cell Biol. 1998;143:637–644. doi: 10.1083/jcb.143.3.637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Rockett BD, Teague H, Harris M, Melton M, Williams J, Wassall SR, Shaikh SR. Fish oil increases raft size and membrane order of B cells accompanied by differential effects on function. J Lipid Res. 2012;53:674–685. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M021782. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Chapkin RS, Wang N, Fan YY, Lupton JR, Prior IA. Docosahexaenoic acid alters the size and distribution of cell surface microdomains. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2008;1778:466–471. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2007.11.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Burns PD, Engle TE, Harris MA, Enns RM, Whittier JC. Effect of fish meal supplementation on plasma and endometrial fatty acid composition in nonlactating beef cows. J Anim Sci. 2003;81:2840–2846. doi: 10.2527/2003.81112840x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Wamsley NE, Burns PD, Engle TE, Enns RM. Fish meal supplementation alters uterine prostaglandin F2alpha synthesis in beef heifers with low luteal-phase progesterone. J Anim Sci. 2005;83:1832–1838. doi: 10.2527/2005.8381832x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.White NR, Burns PD, Cheatham RD, Romero RM, Nozykowski JP, Bruemmer JE, Engle TE. Fish meal supplementation increases bovine plasma and luteal tissue omega-3 fatty acid composition. J Anim Sci. 2012;90:771–778. doi: 10.2527/jas.2011-4208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle. Washington D.C: National Academy Press; 2000. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ahola JK, Engle TE, Burns PD. Effect of copper status, supplementation, and source on pituitary responsiveness to exogenous gonadotropin-releasing hormone in ovariectomized beef cows. J Anim Sci. 2005;83:1812–1823. doi: 10.2527/2005.8381812x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Plewes MR, Burns P, Graham P, Hyslop R, Barisas GB. Effect of fish oil on lateral mobility of prostaglandin F2α (FP) receptors and spatial distribution of lipid microdomains in bovine luteal cell plasma membrane in vitro. Domest Anim Endocrinol. 2017;58:39–52. doi: 10.1016/j.domaniend.2016.08.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Daumas F, Destainville N, Millot C, Lopez A, Dean D, Salomé L. Confined diffusion without fences of a g-protein-coupled receptor as revealed by single particle tracking. Biophys J. 2003;84:356–366. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74856-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Murase K, Fujiwara T, Umemura Y, Suzuki K, Iino R, Yamashita H, Saito M, Murakoshi H, Ritchie K, Kusumi A. Ultrafine membrane compartments for molecular diffusion as revealed by single molecule techniques. Biophys J. 2004;86:4075–4093. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.103.035717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Barisas BG, Smith SM, Liu J, Song J, Hagen GM, Pecht I, Roess DA. Compartmentalization of the Type I Fcε receptor and MAFA on mast cell membranes. Biophys Chem. 2007;126:209–217. doi: 10.1016/j.bpc.2006.05.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Burns PD, Bonnette TR, Engle TE, Whittier JC. Effects of fishmeal supplementation on fertility and plasma omega-3 fatty acid profiles in primiparous, lactating beef cows. Profes Anim Sci. 18:373–379. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Burke JM, Staples CR, Risco CA, De La Sota RL, Thatcher WW. Effect of ruminant grade menhaden fish meal on reproductive and productive performance of lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 1997;80:3386–3398. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(97)76314-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Bruckental I, Drori D, Kaim M, Lehrer H, Folman Y. Effects of source and level of protein on milk yield and reproductive performance of high-producing primiparous and multiparous dairy cows. Anim Sci. 1989;48:319–329. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Mattos R, Guzeloglu A, Badinga L, Staples CR, Thatcher WW. Polyunsaturated fatty acids and bovine interferon-tau modify phorbol ester-induced secretion of prostaglandin F2 alpha and expression of prostaglandin endoperoxide synthase-2 and phospholipase-A2 in bovine endometrial cells. Biol Reprod. 2003;69:780–787. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.102.015057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Mattos R, Staples CR, Williams J, Amorocho A, McGuire MA, Thatcher WW. Uterine, ovarian, and production responses of lactating dairy cows to increasing dietary concentrations of menhaden fish meal. J Dairy Sci. 2002;85:755–764. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74133-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Fan Y-Y, Ly LH, Barhoumi R, McMurray DN, Chapkin RS. Dietary docosahexaenoic acid suppresses T cell protein kinase C lipid raft recruitment and IL-2 production. J Immunol. 2004;173:6151–6160. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.173.10.6151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Childs S, Hennessy AA, Sreenan JM, Wathes DC, Cheng Z, Stanton C, Diskin MG, Kenny DA. Effect of level of dietary n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation on systemic and tissue fatty acid concentrations and on selected reproductive variables in cattle. Theriogenology. 2008;70:595–611. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Burns PD, Spitzer JC, Henricks DM. Effect of dietary energy restriction on follicular development and luteal function in nonlactating beef cows. J Anim Sci. 1997;75:1078–1086. doi: 10.2527/1997.7541078x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Vandehaar MJ, Sharma BK, Fogwell RL. Effect of dietary energy restriction on the expression of insulin-like growth factor-I in liver and corpus luteum of heifers. J Dairy Sci. 1995;78:832–841. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(95)76695-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Bergfeld EG, Kojima FN, Cupp AS, Wehrman ME, Peters KE, Garcia-Winder M, Kinder JE. Ovarian follicular development in prepubertal heifers is influenced by level of dietary energy intake. Biol Reprod. 1994;51:1051–1057. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod51.5.1051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Harder T, Scheiffele P, Verkade P, Simons K. Lipid domain structure of the plasma membrane revealed by patching of membrane components. J Cell Biol. 1998;141:929–942. doi: 10.1083/jcb.141.4.929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Turk HF, Chapkin RS. Membrane lipid raft organization is uniquely modified by n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids. 2013;88:43–47. doi: 10.1016/j.plefa.2012.03.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Gurzell EA, Teague H, Harris M, Clinthorne J, Shaikh SR, Fenton JI. DHA-enriched fish oil targets B cell lipid microdomains and enhances ex vivo and in vivo B cell function. J Leukoc Biol. 2013;93:463–470. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0812394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Dietrich C, Yang B, Fujiwara T, Kusumi A, Jacobson K. Relationship of lipid rafts to transient confinement zones detected by single particle tracking. Biophys J. 2002;82:274–284. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(02)75393-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Simons K, Toomre D. Lipid rafts and signal transduction. Nature rev Mol cell biol. 2000;1:31–39. doi: 10.1038/35036052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Daumas F, Destainville N, Millot C, Lopez A, Dean D, Salomé L. Confined diffusion without fences of a G-protein-coupled receptor as revealed by single particle tracking. Biophy J. 2003;84:356–366. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74856-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Wolf-Ringwall AL, Winter PW, Liu J, Van Orden AK, Roess DA, Barisas BG. Restricted lateral diffusion of luteinizing hormone receptors in membrane microdomains. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:29818–29827. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.250969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Wolf-Ringwall AL, Winter PW, Roess DA, Barisas BG. Luteinizing hormone receptors are confined in mesoscale plasma membrane microdomains throughout recovery from receptor desensitization. Cell biochem biophy. 2014;68:561–569. doi: 10.1007/s12013-013-9738-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Smith SML, Lei Y, Liu J, Cahill ME, Hagen GM, Barisas BG, Roess DA. Luteinizing hormone receptors translocate to plasma membrane microdomains after binding of human chorionic gonadotropin. Endocrinology. 2006;147:1789–1795. doi: 10.1210/en.2005-1046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Saxton MJ. Single-particle tracking: the distribution of diffusion coefficients. Biophys J. 72:1744–1753. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(97)78820-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Kusumi A, Ike H, Nakada C, Murase K, Fujiwara T. Single-molecule tracking of membrane molecules: plasma membrane compartmentalization and dynamic assembly of raft-philic signaling molecules. Seminars Immunol. 2005;17:3–21. doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2004.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Simson R, Sheets ED, Jacobson K. Detection of temporary lateral confinement of membrane proteins using single-particle tracking analysis. Biophys J. 69:989–993. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(95)79972-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Chegini N, Lei ZM, Rao CV, Hansel W. Cellular distribution and cycle phase dependency of gonadotropin and eicosanoid binding sites in bovine corpora lutea. Biol Reprod. 1991;45:506–513. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod45.3.506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Sharif NA, Xu SX, Williams GW, Crider JY, Griffin BW, Davis TL. Pharmacology of [3H]prostaglandin E1/[3H]prostaglandin E2 and [3H]prostaglandin F2alpha binding to EP3 and FP prostaglandin receptor binding sites in bovine corpus luteum: characterization and correlation with functional data. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1998;286:1094–1102. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Lee S-H, Acosta TJ, Yoshioka S, Okuda K. Prostaglandin F2. ALPHA. Regulates the nitric oxide generating system in bovine luteal endothelial cells. J Reprod Dev. 2009;55:418–424. doi: 10.1262/jrd.20205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Ipsen JH, Karlstrom G, Mouritsen OG, Wennerstrom H, Zuckermann MJ. Phase equilibria in the phosphatidylcholine-cholesterol system. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1987;905:162–172. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(87)90020-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Stillwell W, Wassall SR. Docosahexaenoic acid: membrane properties of a unique fatty acid. Chem Phys Lipids. 2003;126:1–27. doi: 10.1016/s0009-3084(03)00101-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Straume M, Litman BJ. Equilibrium and dynamic structure of large, unilamellar, unsaturated acyl chain phosphatidylcholine vesicles. Higher order analysis of 1,6-diphenyl-1,3,5-hexatriene and 1-[4-(trimethylammonio)phenyl]-6-phenyl-1,3,5-hexatriene anisotropy decay. Biochemistry. 1987;26:5113–5120. doi: 10.1021/bi00390a033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]





