Skip to main content

Some NLM-NCBI services and products are experiencing heavy traffic, which may affect performance and availability. We apologize for the inconvenience and appreciate your patience. For assistance, please contact our Help Desk at info@ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.

The EMBO Journal logoLink to The EMBO Journal
. 1990 Mar;9(3):719–725. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb08165.x

Saturation mutagenesis of the DNA site bound by the small carboxy-terminal domain of gamma delta resolvase.

V Rimphanitchayakit 1, N D Grindley 1
PMCID: PMC551726  PMID: 2155779

Abstract

We have analyzed the sequence requirements for the binding of the carboxy-terminal (DNA binding) domain of gamma delta resolvase to its recognition site. Using an efficient procedure for saturation mutagenesis we have obtained 31 of the possible 36 base substitutions within the 12 bp minimal binding sequence (using a modified right half of resolvase binding site I as the model sequence). Binding assays in vitro with the 43 residue DNA binding domain show that certain substitutions at eight of the 12 positions strongly inhibit complex formation, increasing the dissociation constant by 100-fold or more. The critical positions fall into two groups: the outside 6 bp of the binding sequence (positions 1-6) and positions 9-10. These positions correspond to the regions where the DNA binding domain spans the major and minor grooves, respectively, of its binding site. Base substitutions at the intervening positions (7 and 8) have more modest (less than 20-fold) effects on binding while substitutions at the inner two positions (11 and 12) are virtually neutral. The hierarchies of base preferences within each critical segment suggest that resolvase makes base-specific contacts in both major and minor grooves.

Full text

PDF
719

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Abdel-Meguid S. S., Grindley N. D., Templeton N. S., Steitz T. A. Cleavage of the site-specific recombination protein gamma delta resolvase: the smaller of two fragments binds DNA specifically. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Apr;81(7):2001–2005. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.7.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aggarwal A. K., Rodgers D. W., Drottar M., Ptashne M., Harrison S. C. Recognition of a DNA operator by the repressor of phage 434: a view at high resolution. Science. 1988 Nov 11;242(4880):899–907. doi: 10.1126/science.3187531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Anderson J. E., Ptashne M., Harrison S. C. Structure of the repressor-operator complex of bacteriophage 434. 1987 Apr 30-May 6Nature. 326(6116):846–852. doi: 10.1038/326846a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bass S., Sugiono P., Arvidson D. N., Gunsalus R. P., Youderian P. DNA specificity determinants of Escherichia coli tryptophan repressor binding. Genes Dev. 1987 Aug;1(6):565–572. doi: 10.1101/gad.1.6.565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Benson N., Sugiono P., Youderian P. DNA sequence determinants of lambda repressor binding in vivo. Genetics. 1988 Jan;118(1):21–29. doi: 10.1093/genetics/118.1.21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Burkhoff A. M., Tullius T. D. The unusual conformation adopted by the adenine tracts in kinetoplast DNA. Cell. 1987 Mar 27;48(6):935–943. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90702-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Derbyshire K. M., Salvo J. J., Grindley N. D. A simple and efficient procedure for saturation mutagenesis using mixed oligodeoxynucleotides. Gene. 1986;46(2-3):145–152. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(86)90398-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dodd I. B., Egan J. B. Systematic method for the detection of potential lambda Cro-like DNA-binding regions in proteins. J Mol Biol. 1987 Apr 5;194(3):557–564. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(87)90681-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Falvey E., Grindley N. D. Contacts between gamma delta resolvase and the gamma delta res site. EMBO J. 1987 Mar;6(3):815–821. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1987.tb04824.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fried M., Crothers D. M. Equilibria and kinetics of lac repressor-operator interactions by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Nucleic Acids Res. 1981 Dec 11;9(23):6505–6525. doi: 10.1093/nar/9.23.6505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gartenberg M. R., Crothers D. M. DNA sequence determinants of CAP-induced bending and protein binding affinity. Nature. 1988 Jun 30;333(6176):824–829. doi: 10.1038/333824a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Glasgow A. C., Bruist M. F., Simon M. I. DNA-binding properties of the Hin recombinase. J Biol Chem. 1989 Jun 15;264(17):10072–10082. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Grindley N. D., Lauth M. R., Wells R. G., Wityk R. J., Salvo J. J., Reed R. R. Transposon-mediated site-specific recombination: identification of three binding sites for resolvase at the res sites of gamma delta and Tn3. Cell. 1982 Aug;30(1):19–27. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90007-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hatfull G. F., Grindley N. D. Analysis of gamma delta resolvase mutants in vitro: evidence for an interaction between serine-10 of resolvase and site I of res. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Aug;83(15):5429–5433. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.15.5429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hatfull G. F., Noble S. M., Grindley N. D. The gamma delta resolvase induces an unusual DNA structure at the recombinational crossover point. Cell. 1987 Apr 10;49(1):103–110. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90760-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Jordan S. R., Pabo C. O. Structure of the lambda complex at 2.5 A resolution: details of the repressor-operator interactions. Science. 1988 Nov 11;242(4880):893–899. doi: 10.1126/science.3187530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Koo H. S., Wu H. M., Crothers D. M. DNA bending at adenine . thymine tracts. Nature. 1986 Apr 10;320(6062):501–506. doi: 10.1038/320501a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Koudelka G. B., Harbury P., Harrison S. C., Ptashne M. DNA twisting and the affinity of bacteriophage 434 operator for bacteriophage 434 repressor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Jul;85(13):4633–4637. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.13.4633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Koudelka G. B., Harrison S. C., Ptashne M. Effect of non-contacted bases on the affinity of 434 operator for 434 repressor and Cro. 1987 Apr 30-May 6Nature. 326(6116):886–888. doi: 10.1038/326886a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lehming N., Sartorius J., Niemöller M., Genenger G., v Wilcken-Bergmann B., Müller-Hill B. The interaction of the recognition helix of lac repressor with lac operator. EMBO J. 1987 Oct;6(10):3145–3153. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1987.tb02625.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Otwinowski Z., Schevitz R. W., Zhang R. G., Lawson C. L., Joachimiak A., Marmorstein R. Q., Luisi B. F., Sigler P. B. Crystal structure of trp repressor/operator complex at atomic resolution. Nature. 1988 Sep 22;335(6188):321–329. doi: 10.1038/335321a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Pabo C. O., Sauer R. T. Protein-DNA recognition. Annu Rev Biochem. 1984;53:293–321. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.53.070184.001453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Reed R. R. Transposon-mediated site-specific recombination: a defined in vitro system. Cell. 1981 Sep;25(3):713–719. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90178-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Rimphanitchayakit V., Hatfull G. F., Grindley N. D. The 43 residue DNA binding domain of gamma delta resolvase binds adjacent major and minor grooves of DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1989 Feb 11;17(3):1035–1050. doi: 10.1093/nar/17.3.1035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Salvo J. J., Grindley N. D. Helical phasing between DNA bends and the determination of bend direction. Nucleic Acids Res. 1987 Dec 10;15(23):9771–9779. doi: 10.1093/nar/15.23.9771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Salvo J. J., Grindley N. D. The gamma delta resolvase bends the res site into a recombinogenic complex. EMBO J. 1988 Nov;7(11):3609–3616. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1988.tb03239.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Satchwell S. C., Drew H. R., Travers A. A. Sequence periodicities in chicken nucleosome core DNA. J Mol Biol. 1986 Oct 20;191(4):659–675. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(86)90452-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Seeman N. C., Rosenberg J. M., Rich A. Sequence-specific recognition of double helical nucleic acids by proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1976 Mar;73(3):804–808. doi: 10.1073/pnas.73.3.804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Swillens S., Cochaux P., Lecocq R. A pitfall in the computer-aided quantitation of autoradiograms. Trends Biochem Sci. 1989 Nov;14(11):440–441. doi: 10.1016/0968-0004(89)90097-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Takeda Y., Sarai A., Rivera V. M. Analysis of the sequence-specific interactions between Cro repressor and operator DNA by systematic base substitution experiments. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Jan;86(2):439–443. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.2.439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Wells R. G., Grindley N. D. Analysis of the gamma delta res site. Sites required for site-specific recombination and gene expression. J Mol Biol. 1984 Nov 15;179(4):667–687. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(84)90161-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The EMBO Journal are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES