Abstract
Extensive mammographic density is a strong risk factor for breast cancer, but may also be an indicator of biological age. In this study we examined whether mammographic density is related to blood telomere length, a potential marker of susceptibility to age-related disease. We measured mammographic density by a computer assisted method and blood telomere length using a validated PCR method. Urinary malondialdehyde (MDA), a marker of lipid peroxidation, was measured in 24 hour urine collections. In the 342 women examined telomere length was negatively correlated with age, was lower in postmenopausal compared to premenopausal women and in smokers compared to non-smokers, and was positively correlated with urinary MDA. Telomere length was not associated with percent mammographic density or dense area, before or after adjustment for risk factors and MDA. However, there was a significant interaction between telomere length and MDA in their association with mammographic density. At lower levels of MDA, mammographic density and telomere length were inversely associated; while at high levels of MDA, there was evidence of a J-shaped association between mammographic density and telomere length. Further work is need to replicate these results and to examine the association of mammographic density with age-related chronic disease and mortality.
Introduction
Mammographic density (MD), which refers to variations in the radiological appearance of the breast, is one of the strongest known risk factors for breast cancer1. Dense breast tissue contains mainly fibroglandular tissue (epithelial cells and stroma)2, 3 and appears white on mammogram, whereas fatty tissue is radiolucent and appears dark. The amount of MD is highly heritable4 and large differences in MD are observed between women early in life5. The biological mechanism(s) for the increased breast cancer risk associated with MD is not yet known; however, MD may reflect the cumulative exposure of breast tissue to hormones and growth factors that stimulate cell proliferation and to DNA damage due to oxidative stress1. Further knowledge about the phenotype of extensive MD may improve our understanding of its cause and ultimately lead to effective interventions to prevent breast cancer.
While extensive MD is strongly associated with breast cancer risk, it may also be a marker of biological age. MD is greatest at young ages, declines with age, and is reduced by menopause (1). Higher MD is associated with reduced/delayed involution of breast tissue that occurs with age and menopause6, 7, and menopause occurred at a later age in a cohort of women with extensive MD compared to that expected in the general population8. Later menopause is associated with a higher risk of breast cancer, but also with lower risk of mortality9, 10. One study reported an association of higher MD with lower mortality in women without breast cancer11. To explore the possibility that MD may reflect a reduced susceptibility to age-related disease, we examined whether MD was associated with blood telomere length (TL), a potential marker of susceptibility to chronic disease12.
Telomeres, which consist of a variable number of repeat sequences that cap the ends of chromosomes to protect them from damage, shorten with cell division in most somatic cells13. Critically short telomeres can result in the onset of cellular senescence or apoptosis14. The length of telomeres in while blood cells at a given age varies considerably between individuals15. Shorter mean blood TL has been associated with higher risk of mortality16–19, coronary artery disease20, 21, Alzheimer’s disease22, 23, diabetes24, and several solid cancers25, 26.
Although blood TL shortens with age during adult life27, 28 and may be inversely associated with markers of oxidative stress29, 30, TL is highly heritable and differences in blood TL in adults are likely largely determined at birth and as a result of changes during early growth in childhood31. Due to its high heritability, TL in blood also reflects the length of telomeres in other tissues, and longer telomeres may reflect greater replicative potential and ability for tissue repair which influences susceptibility to age related diseases and longevity31.
The primary goal of this study was to examine the association between MD and blood TL. If extensive MD is a marker of reduced susceptibility to age-related chronic disease, we would expect to see that it is positively associated with blood TL. Since both MD and TL have been reported to be associated with oxidative stress29, 30, 32–34; our secondary goal was to determine whether the relationship between MD and blood TL is influenced by levels of urinary MDA excretion, a marker of lipid peroxidation (oxidative stress). We first validated the PCR method35 for measuring TL against the Southern blotting method (Telomere Restriction Fragment analysis; TRF), and then measured blood TL in a sample of women with a wide range of MD.
Methods
General method
We selected pre- and post-menopausal women without breast cancer but with different degrees of mammographic density, collected information about risk factors, and obtained biological samples (serum, urine and DNA) under standardized conditions36. Blood TL was measured using a quantitative PCR method35 that was validated in our laboratory. All procedures were carried out in accordance with the Tri-Council Policy Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans (2005). Ethical approval for the study protocol was obtained from the Human Subjects Review Committee at the University of Toronto and the University Health Network Research Ethics Board. All subjects provided signed informed consent.
Selection of subjects and recruitment
Between 1994 and 1997 potentially eligible women were identified from mammographic units in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Approximately equal numbers of pre- and post-menopausal women were selected in from each of five percent density categories: <10%, 10–25%, 25–50%, 50–75%, and >75%. MD was subsequently classified by quantitative methods that are described below.
Premenopausal women were eligible if they were menstruating regularly, not pregnant or breast-feeding, and had not had a hysterectomy or oophorectomy. Postmenopausal women were eligible if they had spontaneous amenorrhea for at least 12 months, or had had a hysterectomy and were 50 years of age or older, or had had a bilateral oophorectomy at any age. Women taking any type of exogenous hormone preparation, who had had breast augmentation or reduction, or had previously been diagnosed with breast cancer were excluded. In total, 382 women agreed to participate in the study, representing 88% of those who were contacted and found to be eligible.
Epidemiological Risk Factors and Anthropometric Measures
Information about epidemiologic risk factors for MD and breast cancer was collected by an interviewer-administered questionnaire. Subjects were weighed on a balance scale and measured for height.
Measurement of MD
Mammograms of the craniocaudal view of one breast for each subject (side randomly selected) were digitized using a Lumisys model 85. Total breast area and dense area were measured on randomly ordered images using a computer assisted method37 by one reader who was blinded to subject identity and characteristics. Percent MD was calculated by dividing dense area by total area and multiplying by 100. Non dense area (fat) was calculated by subtracting dense area from the total area of the breast. Inter- and intra-batch reliability of mammographic measures was at least 0.9.
DNA and Urine Collection
For premenopausal women, blood and 24 hour urine samples were collected between days 20–24 of the menstrual cycle (luteal phase). Buffy coat was separated and stored at −70 °C until DNA extraction. Precipitated genomic DNA was treated with RNase A and RNase T1 to remove RNA contamination and isolated DNA was hydrolyzed using nuclease P1 and alkaline phosphatase. Extracted DNA was stored at −80 °C until analysis of TL.
During collection urine was stored at room temperature in containers with 5 ml of 5N hydrochloric acid and was couriered to the laboratory the morning after completion of collection. Total urine volume was measured and aliquots were frozen at −70 °C until analysis.
Blood telomere length measurement
To validate the quantitative PCR method, TL was measured in genomic DNA using the standard Southern blotting TRF method and PCR. DNA was extracted from whole blood obtained from 100 subjects who were randomly selected from participants in other ongoing studies5, 38 stratified by age to ensure a wide age range (15–76 years).
Terminal Restriction Fragment (Southern blotting)
Two μg of DNA was digested with HinfI and RsaI, resolved on a 0.5% w/v agarose gel at low voltage, transferred to a nylon membrane and probed with radiolabelled 5′-(CCCTAA)3-3′ telomeric probe. The membrane was reprobed with radiolabelled 1 Kb Plus DNA Ladder (Invitrogen) and the scanned images were merged. Mean telomere length restriction fragment (TRF) values were calculated using Image J and Excel software from at least 3 independent experiments using the method described by Chai et al.39. The coefficient of variation (CV) for TRF triplicates was 1.6%.
Quantitative PCR
Quantitative PCR was based on a method described by Cawthon35, where average telomere length (the T/S ratio) is determined as the factor by which the experimental sample differs from a reference DNA sample in its ratio of telomere repeat copy number to a single gene copy number using SYBR Green as a detector. A serially diluted reference DNA sample (5 to 60 ng per well) was used to generate a standard curve and included a “no template control” (i.e. primers and other components but no genomic DNA) in all PCR reactions. Telomeric PCRs and single gene PCRs were performed in separate 384-well plates, in triplicate, using Power SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems) and 20 ng DNA per well (total volume 10 μl). Telomeric Ct (“T”) was measured using primers from Epel et al.30 at a final concentration of 300 nM, and single gene Ct (“S”) was measured with primers for 36B4 (acidic ribosomal phosphoprotein PO) from Cawthon et al.35 at the recommended concentrations. Reactions were performed in a Prism 7900HT thermocycler (Applied Biosystems) using the following thermal cycling profiles: telomeric amplification 95 °C 10 min, followed by 22 cycles of 95 °C 15 s, 56 °C 30 s and 72 °C 30 s; 36B4 amplification 95 °C 10 min, followed by 30 cycles of 95 °C 15 s and 58 °C 1 min. The T/S value for each sample was calculated using the formula T/S = 2Ct 36B4-Ct tel°mere, where Ct values were obtained from at least 3 triplicate measurements on each of 3 plates (n ≥ 9), and accepted with standard deviations of <0.2. Each experimental sample T/S ratio was then divided by the reference sample T/S ratio to determine the final relative telomere length (RTL).
Validation of PCR
We used samples from 25 of the 100 subjects to initially optimize the procedures for PCR. In these samples, the correlation between TL measured by PCR and TRF was 0.84 and reliability was 0.80 based on repeated measurements. We carried out the formal validation using DNA from the remaining 75 subjects (analyzed in 2 batches of size 35 and 40 subjects respectively that were analyzed about 6 months apart) with a wide age range (15.3–76.4 years; mean = 42.5, SD18.7). Mean TRF was 6.33 kbp (SD 0.40, range 5.32 to 7.32) and mean RTL was 1.03 (SD 0.18; range 0.63 to 1.59). There was one potential outlier for the PCR measurements (1.59) but its exclusion had virtually no effect upon the results and it was retained in the dataset. The two measures of blood TL were highly correlated (r = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.61, 0.82; see Supplementary Fig. S1). After adjustment for batch, the correlation between measures was 0.83 (95% CI: 0.74, 0.89). Both measures were strongly inversely correlated with age (r = −0.71, 95% CI: −0.81, −0.58 for TRF and r = −0.62, 95% CI: −0.74, −0.46 for RTL; see Supplementary Fig. S2).
Measurement of RTL for Mammographic Density Study
A total of 351 DNA samples were thawed at 4 °C, and DNA concentrations were re-measured using a NanoDrop Spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Quantitative PCR was performed using 10 ng DNA per well and RTL was calculated as described above. The samples were divided into 4 batches (plates). Each batch contained 10 intra-batch repeats and 20 DNA samples were measured in each batch (inter-batch repeats). In addition, repeat samples of DNA from 35 randomly selected subjects were distributed randomly throughout the batches to measure reliability. The intra-class correlation for the intra-batch and inter-batch repeats was 0.9. The repeat measures for 35 samples randomly dispersed across batches were highly correlated at 0.80, and after exclusion of one outlier, the correlation was 0.87. The inter-batch CV for RTL measured by PCR was 4.6%.
MDA Measurement
MDA in urine was measured in triplicate by HPLC determination of thiobarbituric acid derivatives as described by Bird et al.40. Samples were extracted with trichloracetic acid and then heated with thiobarbituric acid. The thiobarbituric acid-MDA complex was separated using HPLC and the absorbance measured at 535-nm.
Statistical Methods
The distributions of non dense breast area and MDA measurements were highly skewed and both variables were expressed as the natural log to improve normality. Blood telomere measurements (TRF and PCR) were approximately normally distributed or symmetrical and were not transformed. To improve distribution of residuals plotted against the predicted values from the multiple linear regression analyses (see below), percent MD and dense area were square root transformed and waist circumference was expressed as the negative inverse.
The characteristics of premenopausal and postmenopausal women were compared using 2 sample t-tests for symmetrically distributed continuous variables, Wilcoxon rank sum tests for continuous variables whose distributions were skewed, and Chi square test for categorical variables. The univariate association between RTL and mammographic measures was assessed by Spearman correlation and simple linear regression. We first examined the univariate associations of age, anthropometrics, breast cancer risk factors and MDA with RTL and mammographic measures using simple linear regression and then determined their independent associations with the outcomes using multiple linear regression.
Multiple linear regression was also used to assess the relationship between RTL and mammographic measures (outcome measure) after adjustment for potential confounders and to test selected multiplicative interaction terms with RTL (urinary MDA, menopausal status and waist circumference). Linearity of the association of RTL with mammographic measures was assessed by examining RTL as a categorical (tertiles) variable.
Data analyses were carried out using the SAS statistical software package (version 9.3 SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). All tests were 2-sided and results were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05.
Data Availability
Access to data generated and analysed for this study requires approval from the University Health Network Research Ethics Board for Oncology, and adherence to the guidelines for the protection of privacy of research subjects laid down by the Canadian Institute for Health Research. Requests for the data may be sent to the corresponding author.
Results
Study Population
DNA was available for 92% (n = 351) of the 382 women in the original MD study36. RTL results for 8 subjects were excluded as their replicate measures had a SD greater than 0.2, and one outlier (RTL of 2.8) was excluded leaving 342 subjects for analysis.
Table 1 shows selected characteristics of the subjects presented for the whole group and divided by menopausal status. In the whole group, the mean age was 50.4 (SD 7.2), body mass index (BMI) was 25.6 (SD 5.9), and percent MD was 40.2% (SD 25.3). Because women were selected to represent a wide range of percent MD, and percent MD is strongly associated with weight (33), the sampling procedure also resulted in a wide range in weight (38.6 to 152.9 kg). Compared to premenopausal women, postmenopausal women were older and weighed more, had lower percent MD, and RTL, and higher non dense area and urinary MDA.
Table 1.
Selected characteristics of subjects.
| All Women (n = 342) | Premenopausal (n = 173) | Postmenopausal (n = 169) | p valuea | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 50.4 (7.2) | 44.8 (4.7) | 56.0 (4.4) | <0.0001 |
| Weight (kg) | 68.5 (16.4) | 66.9 (15.6) | 70.1 (17.0) | 0.07 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 25.6 (5.9) | 25.1 (5.7) | 26.0 (6.1) | 0.12 |
| Waist (cm) | 73.5 (13.9) | 71.6 (13.2) | 75.4 (14.3) | 0.01 |
| Parous (%) | 72.5 | 70.5 | 74.6 | 0.40 |
| Family History of breast cancer (%)b | 22.5 | 23.7 | 21.3 | 0.60 |
| Current Smoking (%) | 12.6 | 14.5 | 10.7 | 0.29 |
| Percent Mammographic Density (%) | 40.2 (25.3) | 43.7 (25.7) | 36.6 (24.5) | 0.01 |
| Dense Area (cm2) | 46.2 (32.6) | 48.7 (31.4) | 43.5 (33.6) | 0.14 |
| Non Dense Area (cm2- log) | 4.19 (0.83) | 4.08 (0.84) | 4.30 (0.82) | 0.02 |
| Relative Telomere Length | 1.03 (0.20) | 1.10 (0.21) | 0.97 (0.18) | <0.0001 |
| Urinary MDA (umol/l – log) | 7.96 (0.48) | 7.85 (0.51) | 8.07 (0.43) | <0.0001 |
Continuous variables are presented as mean (SD) and categorical variables as percentage.
ap value for comparison of pre and postmenopausal women. Two-sided two-sample t-test for continuous variables and Chi square test for categorical variables.
bPercentage of subjects with at least one first degree family member with breast cancer.
Univariate association of mammographic measures and RTL
There were no significant correlations between mammographic measures and RTL in univariate analysis (Fig. 1). In premenopausal women, the correlation of percent MD, dense area and non dense area with RTL was 0.05, 0.06, and −0.09 respectively, and in postmenopausal women were 0.01, 0.04, and 0.01 respectively (all p-values ≥ 0.3).
Figure 1.

Correlation between relative telomere length and percent mammographic density (a), dense area (b), and non dense area (c). Rho = Spearman correlation coefficient.
Association of covariates with mammographic density, RTL and MDA
Prior to examining the influence of risk factors and MDA on the association of RTL with mammographic measures, we examined the associations of the risk factors with mammographic measures, RTL and MDA using simple linear regression (Supplementary Tables S1 and S2) and multiple regression (Table 2 and Supplementary Table S3). Multiple regression was performed in the subset of subjects with urinary MDA measures (n = 305), but the results for variables other than MDA were similar in the larger set of 342 women. Among the measures of body size examined (weight, body mass index and waist circumference), waist circumference was the most strongly associated with the mammographic measures, and was the measure of body size used in all multivariable analyses.
Table 2.
Factors associated with percent mammographic density, relative telomere length and urinary MDA (multiple regression; n = 305).
| Characteristic | Percent Mammographic Density (square root)a | Relative telomere lengtha,b | Urinary MDA (log)a | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta | SE | p value | Beta | SE | p value | Beta | SE | p value | |
| Age (years) | −0.003 | 0.02 | 0.90 | −0.005 | 0.002 | 0.02 | −0.008 | 0.006 | 0.16 |
| Waist Circumferencec (cm) | −679.6 | 45.0 | <0.0001 | −6.88 | 4.62 | 0.14 | 16.82 | 11.5 | 0.15 |
| Height (cm) | −0.003 | 0.02 | 0.85 | 0.002 | 0.002 | 0.30 | 0.01 | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Age at Menarche (years) | 0.04 | 0.07 | 0.52 | −0.009 | 0.007 | 0.21 | −0.02 | 0.02 | 0.26 |
| Parity (Yes vs no) | −0.20 | 0.23 | 0.23 | −0.005 | 0.02 | 0.83 | −0.02 | 0.06 | 0.78 |
| Age at First Child (years) | 0.06 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.002 | 0.002 | 0.47 | 0.007 | 0.006 | 0.22 |
| Menopausal Status Post vs Premenopausal | −0.05 | 0.34 | 0.88 | −0.08 | 0.05 | 0.02 | 0.32 | 0.09 | 0.0003 |
| Family History of Breast Cancer Yes vs No | 0.10 | 0.24 | 0.70 | −0.02 | 0.03 | 0.43 | 0.02 | 0.06 | 0.77 |
| Current Smoking Smoker vs non smoker | −0.42 | 0.32 | 0.19 | −0.07 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.15 | 0.08 | 0.07 |
| Urinary MDA (log) | 0.37 | 0.23 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.02 | 0.02 | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| R square for model | 49% | 23% | 11% | ||||||
MDA = malondialdehyde; RTL = relative telomere length; SE = standard error; n/a = not applicable.
aOutcome measure for regression analysis.
bAdjusted for batch of PCR analysis; cNegative inverse transformed.
In multivariable models (Table 2), waist circumference was strongly inversely associated with percent MD (p < 0.0001), while later age at first birth was associated with higher percent density (p = 0.01). The positive association of urinary MDA with percent MD was not statistically significant (p = 0.10). The associations with dense area were similar to those observed for percent MD; whereas for non dense area they were in the opposite direction, but only the positive association with waist circumference was statistically significant (Supplementary Table S3).
Higher age was negatively associated with RTL (p = 0.02) and premenopausal women had longer RTL than postmenopausal women (p = 0.02) (Table 2). Non-smokers had longer RTL than smokers (p = 0.03) and urinary MDA was positively associated with RTL (p = 0.02). Greater height (p = 0.004), smoking (p = 0.07), and being postmenopausal versus premenopausal (p = 0.0003) were associated with higher levels of MDA.
There were no associations of family history of breast cancer, age at menarche or parity with any of the outcome measures in univariate or adjusted analyses.
Association of mammographic measures and RTL after adjustment for covariates
Table 3 shows that RTL was not significantly associated with any of the mammographic measures before or after adjustment for the risk factors (from Table 2) and MDA. When we categorized RTL into tertiles, the adjusted (least square) means for percent MD (square root) were 5.98, 5.72, 5.75 (ANOVA p = 0.57; p for trend = 0.40).
Table 3.
Association of relative telomere length with percent mammographic density and dense area before and after adjustment for risk factors and urinary MDA (n = 305).
| Variable | Percent Mammographic Density (square root)a | Dense Area (square root)a | Non dense area (log)a | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta | SE | p value | Beta | SE | p value | Beta | SE | p value | |
| RTL aloneb | 0.82 | 0.71 | 0.25 | 0.82 | 0.73 | 0.26 | −0.41 | 0.25 | 0.10 |
| RTL adjusted for risk factorsc | −0.32 | 0.57 | 0.58 | 0.21 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 0.05 | 0.16 | 0.77 |
| RTL adjusted for Risk Factors and MDAd | −0.44 | 0.57 | 0.44 | 0.05 | 0.75 | 0.95 | 0.07 | 0.17 | 0.66 |
| Interaction between RTL and MDAe | 3.54 | 1.06 | 0.001 | 2.82 | 1.41 | 0.05 | −1.17 | 0.31 | 0.0002 |
RTL = relative telomere length; MDA = malondialdehyde; SE = standard error.
aOutcome measure for regression analysis.
bAdjusted for PCR batch only.
cAdjusted for PCR batch and risk factors (from Table 2), except for MDA.
dAdjusted for PCR batch, risk factors and MDA.
eInteraction term for RTL*MDA, adjusted for main effects and risk factors.
There were no significant interactions of RTL with menopausal status or waist circumference for any of the mammographic measures (p > 0.56 for all). However, there was a significant interaction between RTL and urinary MDA (Table 3, last row; p = 0.001 for percent MD; p = 0.05 for dense area and p = 0.0002 for non dense area). To illustrate this interaction for percent MD, we categorized RTL and MDA into tertiles and show the least square means of percent MD (back transformed) for each category in Fig. 2. In the lower 2 tertiles of MDA, longer RTL was associated with lower percent MD. However, in the highest tertile of MDA, these results suggest a J-shaped curve, with highest percent MD in the highest tertile of RTL. The interaction is illustrated in the same way for dense area and non dense area in Supplementary Fig. S3.
Figure 2.

Percent mammographic density by tertiles of urinary MDA and RTL. Results are shown as least square means and standard error bars. P value for interaction between tertiles of MDA and tertiles of percent density = 0.02. MDA = malondialdehyde; RTL = relative telomere length.
Because waist circumference was strongly correlated with percent MD and also influenced the association of MDA with mammographic measures, we examined the interaction term in the model for percent MD without adjustment for any other covariates as a sensitivity analysis. The interaction between RTL and MDA was highly significant (Beta = 3.93, p = 0.007).
Discussion
To explore the possibility that MD, a strong risk factor for breast cancer, may be related longevity or lower risk of age-related chronic disease, we examined whether MD was associated with blood TL, a potential marker of susceptibility to age-related chronic disease. The overall results of our study show no association between MD and TL and are in agreement with the one other study on this relationship41. However, we also examined the influence of lipid peroxidation on the association of MD and TL, and we found that in women with low/moderate levels of urinary MDA excretion, there was an inverse association between MD and TL; whereas in women with high levels of urinary MDA excretion, women with the highest relative blood TL had the highest MD.
The association of blood TL with breast cancer risk has been inconsistent25, 26. Retrospective case-control studies have reported no significant difference in blood TL between breast cancer cases and controls42–45, and higher breast cancer risk associated with shorter telomeres46 and longer telomeres47–49. Of the four prospective studies published to date, one reported no association of TL with breast cancer risk50 and three reported that shorter TL was associated with higher breast cancer risk46, 51, 52; however, only the results of Qu et al.52 were statistically significant. Our observation of an inverse association of TL with MD in women with low/moderate levels of urinary MDA excretion are consistent with these results. Qu et al.52 also reported a reverse J-shaped association; with shorter and longer telomeres being associated with higher breast cancer risk. In women with high urinary MDA excretion, we observed that women in the highest tertile of blood TL had the highest percent MD. Together these results do not rule out the possibility that, in some contexts, longer TL could be associated with higher MD and higher breast cancer risk.
We know of only one study that examined markers of oxidative stress and blood TL with breast cancer risk44. Shen et al. reported that urinary excretion of isoprostane and 8-oxo-7,8-dihydrodeoxyguanosine (markers of lipid peroxidation and DNA damage from oxidative stress respectively) were not associated with breast cancer risk, and did not modify the association of TL with breast cancer risk.
In agreement with other studies41, 51, 52, we did not observe any association of blood TL with traditional breast cancer risk factors, specifically age at menarche, parity, age at first child or family history of breast cancer. Factors associated with oxidative stress such as smoking, higher body weight, psychological stress, insulin resistance and C-reactive protein levels (a marker of inflammation) are associated with shorter blood TL15, 18, 30, 53, 54. Urinary isoprostane excretion, a marker of lipid peroxidation, has been reported to be inversely associated with blood TL in some29, 30, but not all44 studies. Consistent with these observations, we found that higher waist circumference, postmenopausal status, and smoking were associated with shorter TL and higher urinary MDA excretion, also a marker of lipid peroxidation. Unexpectedly, we found that urinary MDA excretion was positively associated with blood TL. The reason for this positive association unclear. We55 and others56 have reported little correlation between measures of MDA and isoprostane, and that isoprostane levels were more strongly positively correlated with body mass index compared to MDA levels. Therefore, urinary MDA and isoprostane excretion may reflect different cellular networks and/or different sensitivities to exposures. For example, diet is a potential source of MDA excreted in urine57 and MDA is as a by-product of thromboxane synthesis in platelets via the cyclo-oxygenase cascade58, while urinary isoprostane is not related to these sources.
The strengths of our study include the large sample size, wide range of MD, and use of validated, reliable measurements of MD59, 60 and TL. Few of the previous breast cancer studies validated their PCR-based TL measurements against the standard TRF method (Southern blotting), and several of them reported higher inter- and intra-assay CVs for the PCR-based TL measurements (14 to 28%)42, 44, 51 compared with the inter-assay CV of 4.6% reported by our lab and other laboratories with extensive experience using these methods35, 61.
A potential limitation of this study is that we measured mean TL in all white blood cells combined, and different blood cell types vary in the length of their telomeres62, 63. Mean TL is positively correlated with TL in all white blood cell types examined, but the relationship was strongest for CD8+ T cells63, which showed the strongest negative correlation of TL with age, and are the cells most reflective of immunosenescence63. It is possible that TL in particular cell types are associated with MD, or that differences in the distribution of cell types obscured a relationship between TL and MD.
In addition, the PCR method measures the mean TL over all chromosomes combined. The small percentage of critically short telomeres, rather than the mean TL, may be more important to cell viability and chromosomal stability64–67, and TL on particular chromosomes may be important for certain types of cancer68. For example, Zheng et al. showed that shorter telomere length in chromosome 9 was strongly associated with breast cancer risk while mean telomere length was not associated with breast cancer risk68.
In conclusion, our overall results show no association between MD and blood TL and are consistent with the one previous study on this association41. However, our study suggests that this relationship may depend on the level of oxidative stress. At low to moderate levels of urinary MDA, the association between MD and blood TL was inverse suggesting that higher MD may be associated with higher susceptibility to age-related chronic diseases. In contrast, there may be a subgroup of women (with high level of MDA excretion) who have high MD and long telomeres and therefore may be less susceptible to age-related chronic disease. Further work is needed to replicate these results and to further understand the relationships between TL, MD and markers of oxidative stress. In addition, the association of MD with outcomes other than breast cancer needs to be examined to provide insights into the etiology of MD and to aid in the development of safe and effective interventions to reduce breast cancer risk.
Electronic supplementary material
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr. Norman Boyd for providing the DNA for telomere analysis and demographic and malondialdehyde data collected as part of previous work funded by the National Cancer Institute of Canada. This work was supported by grants from the Canadian Breast Cancer Research Alliance (LJM), the National Institutes of Health (LAH, RO1-AG024398), and the Wellcome Trust (LAH, WT84637). LAH acknowledges the prior funding support of the NIH (RO1 AG02398) and the Howard Hughes International Scholar Award Program (55005945).
Author Contributions
N.E. participated in the design of the study and performed all laboratory analyses. L.H. participated in the design of the study and consulted on technical aspects of the laboratory analyses. L.M. designed the study, performed statistical analysis and wrote the manuscript. All authors participated in the interpretation of results and revision of the manuscript.
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Footnotes
Electronic supplementary material
Supplementary information accompanies this paper at doi:10.1038/s41598-017-06036-y
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Martin LJ, Boyd N. Potential mechanisms of breast cancer risk associated with mammographic density: hypotheses based on epidemiological evidence. Breast Cancer Res. 2008;10:1–14. doi: 10.1186/bcr1831. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Li T, et al. The association of measured breast tissue characteristics with mammographic density and other risk factors for breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2005;14:343–349. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-04-0490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Huo CW, et al. High mammographic density is associated with an increase in stromal collagen and immune cells within the mammary epithelium. Breast Cancer Res. 2015;17:79. doi: 10.1186/s13058-015-0592-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Boyd NF, et al. Heritability of mammographic density, a risk factor for breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2002;347:886–894. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa013390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Boyd NF, et al. Breast-tissue composition and other risk factors for breast cancer in young women: a cross-sectional study. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10:569–580. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70078-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ginsburg OM, Martin LJ, Boyd NF. Mammographic density, lobular involution, and risk of breast cancer. Br. J. Cancer. 2008;99:1369–1374. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ghosh K, et al. Association between mammographic density and age-related lobular involution of the breast. J. Clin. Oncol. 2010;28:2207–2212. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.23.4120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Martin LJ, et al. Intervention with a low-fat, high-carbohydrate diet does not influence the time of menopause. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2006;84:920–928. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/84.4.920. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Jacobsen BK, Heuch I, Kvåle G. Age at natural menopause and all-cause mortality: A 37-year follow-up of 19,731 Norwegian women. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2003;157:923–929. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwg066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ossewaarde ME, et al. Age at menopause, cause-specific mortality and total life expectancy. Epidemiol. 2005;16:556–562. doi: 10.1097/01.ede.0000165392.35273.d4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Murphy RA, et al. Beyond breast cancer: mammographic features and mortality risk in a population of healthy women. PLoS One. 2013;8:e78722. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078722. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Aviv A, Kark JD, Susser E. Telomeres, atherosclerosis, and human longevity: a causal hypothesis. Epidemiology. 2015;26:295–299. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.von Zglinicki T. Oxidative stress shortens telomeres. Trends in Biochemical Sciences. 2002;27:339–344. doi: 10.1016/S0968-0004(02)02110-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Rodier F, Kim SH, Nijjar T, Yaswen P, Campisi J. Cancer and aging: the importance of telomeres in genome maintenance. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2005;37:977–990. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2004.10.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Valdes AM, et al. Obesity, cigarette smoking, and telomere length in women. Lancet. 2005;366:662–664. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66630-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Cawthon RM, Smith KR, O’Brien E, Sivatchenko A, Kerber RA. Association between telomere length in blood and mortality in people aged 60 years or older. Lancet. 2003;361:393–395. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12384-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Needham BL, et al. Leukocyte telomere length and mortality in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999-2002. Epidemiology. 2015;26:528–535. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Rode L, Nordestgaard BG, Bojesen SE. Peripheral blood leukocyte telomere length and mortality among 64,637 individuals from the general population. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2015;107:djv074. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djv074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Deelen J, et al. Leukocyte telomere length associates with prospective mortality independent of immune-related parameters and known genetic markers. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2014;43:878–886. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyt267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.D’Mello MJ, et al. Association between shortened leukocyte telomere length and cardiometabolic outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis. Circ. Cardiovasc. Genet. 2015;8:82–90. doi: 10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.113.000485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Haycock PC, et al. Leucocyte telomere length and risk of cardiovascular disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2014;349:g4227. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g4227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Panossian LA, et al. Telomere shortening in T cells correlates with Alzheimer’s disease statu. s. Neurobiol. Aging. 2003;24:77–84. doi: 10.1016/S0197-4580(02)00043-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Thomas P, O’ Callaghan NJ, Fenech M. Telomere length in white blood cells, buccal cells and brain tissue and its variation with ageing and Alzheimer’s diseas. e. Mech. Ageing Dev. 2008;129:183–190. doi: 10.1016/j.mad.2007.12.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Jeanclos E, et al. Shortened telomere length in white blood cells of patients with IDDM. Diabetes. 1998;47:482–486. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.47.3.482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ma H, et al. Shortened telomere length is associated with increased risk of cancer: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2011;6:e20466. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Wentzensen IM, Mirabello L, Pfeiffer RM, Savage SA. The association of telomere length and cancer: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2011;20:1238–1250. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Aviv A, et al. Leukocyte telomere dynamics: longitudinal findings among young adults in the Bogalusa Heart Study. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2009;169:323–329. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwn338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Chen W, et al. Longitudinal versus cross-sectional evaluations of leukocyte telomere length dynamics: age-dependent telomere shortening is the rule. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2011;66:312–319. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glq223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Demissie S, et al. Insulin resistance, oxidative stress, hypertension, and leukocyte telomere length in men from the Framingham Heart Study. Aging Cell. 2006;5:325–330. doi: 10.1111/j.1474-9726.2006.00224.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Epel ES, et al. Accelerated telomere shortening in response to life stress. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2004;101:17312–17315. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0407162101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Hunt SC, Kark JD, Aviv A. Association between shortened leukocyte telomere length and cardio-metabolic outcomes. Circ. Cardiovasc. Genet. 2015;8:4–7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.114.000964. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Boyd NF, McGuire V. Evidence of lipid peroxidation in premenopausal women with mammographic dysplasia. Cancer Lett. 1990;50:31–37. doi: 10.1016/0304-3835(90)90175-W. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Boyd NF, et al. Plasma lipids, lipoproteins, and mammographic densities. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 1995;4:727–733. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Hong CC, et al. Cytochrome P450 1A2 (CYP1A2) activity, mammographic density, and oxidative stress: a cross-sectional study. Breast Cancer Res. 2004;6:R338–R351. doi: 10.1186/bcr797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Cawthon RM. Telomere measurement by quantitative PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30:e47. doi: 10.1093/nar/30.10.e47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Boyd NF, et al. The association of breast mitogens with mammographic densities. Br. J. Cancer. 2002;87:876–882. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Byng JW, Boyd NF, Fishell E, Jong RA, Yaffe MJ. Automated analysis of mammographic densities. Phys. Med. Biol. 1996;41:909–923. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/41/5/007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Tam CY, et al. Risk factors for breast cancer in postmenopausal Caucasian and Chinese-Canadian women. Breast Cancer Res. 2010;12:R2. doi: 10.1186/bcr2465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Chai W, Shay JW, Wright WE. Human telomeres maintain their overhang length at senescence. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2005;25:2158–2168. doi: 10.1128/MCB.25.6.2158-2168.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Bird RP, Hung SSO, Hadley M, Draper HH. Determination of malondialdehyde in biological materials by high pressure liquid chromatography. Anal. Biochem. 1983;128:240–244. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(83)90371-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Bodelon C, et al. Leukocyte telomere length and its association with mammographic density and proliferative diagnosis among women undergoing diagnostic image-guided breast biopsy. BMC Cancer. 2015;15:823. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1860-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Shen J, et al. Short telomere length and breast cancer risk: a study in sister sets. Cancer Res. 2007;67:5538–5544. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-3490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Barwell J, et al. Is telomere length in peripheral blood lymphocytes correlated with cancer susceptibility or radiosensitivity? Br. J. Cancer. 2007;97:1696–1700. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Shen J, et al. Telomere length, oxidative damage, antioxidants and breast cancer risk. Int. J. Cancer. 2009;124:1637–1643. doi: 10.1002/ijc.24105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Zheng YL, et al. Telomere length in blood cells and breast cancer risk: investigations in two case-control studies. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2010;120:769–775. doi: 10.1007/s10549-009-0440-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Pooley KA, et al. Telomere length in prospective and retrospective cancer case-control studies. Cancer Res. 2010;70:3170–3176. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-4595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Svenson U, et al. Breast cancer survival is associated with telomere length in peripheral blood cells. Cancer Res. 2008;68:3618–3623. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-6497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Pellatt AJ, et al. Telomere length, telomere-related genes, and breast cancer risk: the breast cancer health disparities study. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2013;52:595–609. doi: 10.1002/gcc.22056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Gramatges MM, Telli ML, Balise R, Ford JM. Longer relative telomere length in blood from women with sporadic and familial breast cancer compared with healthy controls. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2010;19:605–613. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0896. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Kim S, et al. Telomere length in peripheral blood and breast cancer risk in a prospective case-cohort analysis: results from the Sister Study. Cancer Causes Control. 2011;22:1061–1066. doi: 10.1007/s10552-011-9778-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.De Vivo I, et al. A prospective study of relative telomere length and postmenopausal breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers & Prev. 2009;18:1152–1156. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Qu S, et al. Association of leukocyte telomere length with breast cancer risk: nested case-control findings from the Shanghai Women’s Health Stud. y. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2013;177:617–24. doi: 10.1093/aje/kws291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Gardner JP, et al. Rise in insulin resistance is associated with escalated telomere attrition. Circulation. 2005;111:2171–2177. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000163550.70487.0B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Aviv A, et al. Menopause modifies the association of leukocyte telomere length with insulin resistance and inflammation. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2006;91:635–640. doi: 10.1210/jc.2005-1814. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Martin, L. J. & Boyd, N. F. Oxidative stress in breast carcinogenesis in Endogenous Toxins: Diet, Genetics, Disease and Treatment (eds Bruce, W. R. & O’Brien, P.) 701–725 (STMS Books, Weinheim, 2009).
- 56.Block G, et al. Factors associated with oxidative stress in human populations. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2002;156:274–285. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwf029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Draper HH, Polensek L, Hadley M, McGirr LG. Urinary malondialdehyde as an indicator of lipid peroxidation in the diet and in the tissues. Lipids. 1984;19:836–843. doi: 10.1007/BF02534512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Wang LH, Tsai AL, Hsu PY. Substrate binding is the rate-limiting step in thromboxane synthase catalysis. J. Biol. Chem. 2001;276:14737–14743. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M009177200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Boyd NF, et al. Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2007;356:227–236. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa062790. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.McCormack VA, dos Santos Silva I. Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: A meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15:1159–1169. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Aviv A, et al. Impartial comparative analysis of measurement of leukocyte telomere length/DNA content by Southern blots and qPCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39:e134. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr634. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Rufer N, et al. Telomere fluorescence measurements in granulocytes and T lymphocyte subsets point to a high turnover of hematopoietic stem cells and memory T cells in early childhood. J. Exp. Med. 1999;190:157–167. doi: 10.1084/jem.190.2.157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Lin J, et al. Analyses and comparisons of telomerase activity and telomere length in human T and B cells: insights for epidemiology of telomere maintenance. J. Immuno. Methods. 2010;352:71–80. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2009.09.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Hemann MT, Strong MA, Hao LY, Greider CW. The shortest telomere, not average telomere length, is critical for cell viability and chromosome stability. Cell. 2001;107:67–77. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00504-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Xu L, Blackburn EH. Human cancer cells harbor T-stumps, a distinct class of extremely short telomere. Molecular Cell. 2007;28:315–327. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.10.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Capper R, et al. The nature of telomere fusion and a definition of the critical telomere length in human cells. Genes & Development. 2007;21:2495–2508. doi: 10.1101/gad.439107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Erdmann N, Liu Y, Harrington L. Distinct dosage requirements for the maintenance of long and short telomeres in mTert heterozygous mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2004;101:6080–6085. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0401580101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Zheng YL, Loffredo CA, Shields PG, Selim SM. Chromosome 9 arm-specific telomere length and breast cancer risk. Carcinogenesis. 2009;30:1380–1386. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgp151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Access to data generated and analysed for this study requires approval from the University Health Network Research Ethics Board for Oncology, and adherence to the guidelines for the protection of privacy of research subjects laid down by the Canadian Institute for Health Research. Requests for the data may be sent to the corresponding author.
