Skip to main content
Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica. B logoLink to Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica. B
. 2017 Jun 24;7(4):485–490. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2017.06.002

Phytochemical study of Illicium angustisepalum and its biological activities

Karina M Szymulanska-Ramamurthy a, Ming Zhao a,b, Chun-Tao Che a,
PMCID: PMC5518666  PMID: 28752034

Abstract

Sixteen compounds, including two new natural products (1 and 2), were obtained from the twigs of Illicium angustisepalum. The structures were elucidated based on NMR, MS, IR data and optical rotation values. Compounds 4, 5, 6 and 8 displayed moderate antibacterial activities against clinical isolates; compounds 4, 5, 8, 9 and 15 protected neural cells against oxidative stress; and compounds 10 and 14 exhibited anti-acetylcholinesterase activity.

KEY WORDS: Illicium angustisepalum, Chemical ingredients, Antibacterial, Neuroprotection, Anti-acetylcholinesterase

Graphical abstract

The isolation of sixteen compounds (116) from the twigs of Illicium angustisepalum was reported, including the new structures of 3-O-benzoyl-myrcenediol (1) and 3,6-dimethyl-3-hydroxy-tetrahydro-2H-pyran-2-one (2). The isolated compounds were evaluated in a battery of in vitro bioassay models for cytotoxic, antimicrobial, neuroprotective and anti-acetylcholinesterase activities.

fx1

1. Introduction

The genus Illicium L., commonly known as star anise or anise tree, comprises of over thirty species to form one of the earliest evolutionary branches of the angiosperms1. The genus was previously classified as the only member of the Illiciaceae family; but later, the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (APG) III system of 2009 included Illicium in the Schisandraceae without recognizing Illiciaceae as a distinct family2. Represented by evergreen trees and shrubs disjunctively distributed in North America, Mexico, Peru, the West Indies and Eastern Asia, with the highest concentration of species in Northern Myanmar and Southern China, the genus is known to contain unique secondary metabolites, such as terpenoids, phenylpropanoids, lignans and benzoquinones3. The fruit part of several Illicium species is particularly rich in sesquiterpenes of the secoprezizaane, anislactone, and allocedrane types3.

While plants, such as Illicium verum (the common star anise) which is well known for use as a spice and medicinal plant, and Illicium parviflorum as a garden plant, Illicium angustisepalum A.C. Smith is a lesser known species endemic to Southern China. Until now, only two reports concerning its chemical composition (abietane diterpenes and a prezizaane sesquiterpene)4, 5 and one paper describing anti-inflammatory and analgesic effects of the crude extract6 can be found in literature. Herein, we report the isolation of sixteen compounds from the twigs of I. angustisepalum (116, Fig. 1), including the new structures of 3-O-benzoyl-myrcenediol (1) and 3,6-dimethyl-3-hydroxy-tetrahydro-2H-pyran-2-one (2). The isolated compounds were evaluated in a battery of in vitro bioassay models for cytotoxic, antimicrobial, neuroprotective and anti-acetylcholinesterase activities.

Figure 1.

Fig. 1

Sixteen compounds isolated from the twigs of I. angustisepalum (116), including the new structures of 3-O-benzoyl-myrcenediol (1) and 3,6-dimethyl-3-hydroxy-tetrahydro-2H-pyran-2-one (2).

2. Results and discussion

Compound 1 was obtained as a colorless amorphous powder. The HR-ESI-MS of 1 displayed a quasi-molecular ion [M+H]+ at m/z 275.1569 (for C17H23O3; Calcd. 275.1647), corresponding to the molecular formula of C17H22O3 with seven indices of hydrogen deficiency. The IR broad stretch at 3429 cm—1 suggested the presence of hydroxyl and a broad stretch at 1713 cm—1 was consistent with the presence of benzoyl carbonyl moiety. The 1H NMR spectrum (Table 1) displayed signals for olefinic protons at δH 6.34 (dd, J = 11.0, 17.7, H-7), 5.16 (d, J = 17.7, H-8a), 5.02 (br. s, H-8b), 5.0, (br. s, H-9) and two methyl groups at δH 1.22 (s, H3-1/10). The 13C NMR and DEPT-135 NMR spectra of 1 (Table 1) exhibited 17 carbons signals corresponding to two methyl, four methylenes (two olefinic and two aliphatic), seven methines (five aromatic, an olefinic and an aliphatic carbons), an oxygenated tertiary carbon, a carbonyl carbon and two quaternary carbons. The presence of two double bonds accounted for two degrees of unsaturation; the remaining five were ascribed to an aromatic ring and a carbonyl group. In the 1H—1H COSY spectrum, signal at δH 7.61 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, H-5′) displayed correlations with the overlapped signal at δH 7.49 (H-4′/6′), which further exhibited correlation with an overlapped signal at δH 8.07 (dd, J = 7.5, 1.3 Hz, H-3′/7′), suggesting the presence of an unsubstituted aromatic ring. Correlations between H2-4 (δH 1.87/2.02, m) and H-3 (δH 5.09, dd, J = 2.3, 10.1 Hz) and H2-5 (δH 2.23, m) were observed. In addition, observation of COSY correlations between δH 6.34 (H-7), δH 5.16 (H-8a) and δH 5.02 (H-8b) led to establishing the connectivity of the skeleton. Aided by HMBC data, structure 1 was proposed as depicted. It is noteworthy that both the methine proton at δH 5.09 (H-3) and aromatic protons at δH 8.07 (H-3′/7′) displayed long-range correlations with C-1′ carbonyl carbon (δC 168.0). This piece of evidence was helpful in locating an ester group between the aromatic ring and the monoterpene portion of the molecule. The hydroxyl group was assignable to C-2 (δC 72.9) based on HMBC correlations with H3-1, H-3 and H3-10. Finally, the location of the two terminal double bonds was assigned based on the HMBC long-range correlations between H2-8a/8b and C-6/C-7, as well as between H2-9 and C-5/C-6/C-7. Comparison of the NMR data with literature values suggested close similarity of the aliphatic portion of 1 to myrcene-2,3-diol7, 8, 9, 10. Taking all evidence together, the planar structure of 1 was determined to be 3-O-benzoyl-2-methyl-6-methyleneoct-7-ene-2,3-diol and given a trivial name of 3-O-benzoyl-myrcenediol. The small value of optical rotation ([α]D25 + 1.4°; c 0.07, MeOH) suggested it was a racemic mixture of the 3R and 3S enantiomers. To the best of our knowledge, compound 1 is a new natural product.

Table 1.

1H NMR and 13C NMR spectral data for compound 1.

Position δH δC
1 1.22, s 25.5, CH3
2 72.9, C
3 5.09, dd (J = 2.3, 10.1) 81.3, CH
4 4a, 2.02, m (overlapped) 29.3, CH2
4b, 1.87, m (overlapped)
5 2.23, m (overlapped) 29.6, CH2
6 147.2, C
7 6.34, dd (J = 11.0, 17.7) 139.7, CH
8 8a, 5.16, d (J = 17.7) 113.7, CH2
8b, 5.02, m (overlapped)
9 5.0, m (overlapped) 116.7, CH2
10 1.22, s 26.4, CH3
1′ 168.0, C
2′ 131.6, C
3′ 8.07, dd (J = 7.5, 1.3) 130.6, CH
4′ 7.49, t (J = 7.5) 129.6, CH
5′ 7.61, t (J = 7.3) 134.3, CH
6′ 7.49, t (J = 7.5) 129.6, CH
7′ 8.07, dd (J = 7.5, 1.3) 130.6, CH

aData were measured in MeOD-d4 at 400 MHz for 1H NMR and 100 MHz for 13C NMR. The δ values are expressed in ppm and the coupling constants (J) in Hz. The assignments were made on the basis of DEPT, 1H—1H COSY, HSQC and HMBC results.

Compound 2 was obtained as an oil. The HR-ESI-MS quasi-molecular ion [M+H]+ at m/z 145.0866 (Calcd. for C7H13O3, 145.0861) indicated a molecular formula of C7H12O3 with two indices of hydrogen deficiency. The IR absorption at 1779 cm—1 suggested the presence of a δ-lactone. The 13C NMR and DEPT-135 NMR spectra (in methanol-d4, Table 2) displayed seven carbons, including two CH3 (C-7, δC 21.8; C-8, δC 29.8), two CH2 (C-4, δC 44.4; C-5, δC 43.8), a CH (C-6, δC 75.6), a tertiary oxygenated carbon (C-3, δC 68.5) and a carbonyl carbon (C-2, δC 174.0). The 1H—1H COSY spectrum revealed correlations between H2-4 and H2-5, suggesting that the two methylene groups are adjacent to each other. The COSY data also correlated H-6 (δH 4.77, m) with H3-7 and H2-5. It is noteworthy that the carbonyl carbon at δC 174.0 (C-2) displayed HMBC correlation with H-6 at δH 4.77. Compound 2 was thus elucidated to be 3,6-dimethyl-3-hydroxy-tetrahydro-2H-pyran-2-one based on available evidence. Its stereochemistry has not been determined. Nevertheless, it is noted that, in a similar structure [3-hydroxy-3-methyl-6-(3-methylbut-3-enyl)tetrahydro-2H-pyran-2-one]11, the 3β-methyl group resonates at δH 2.1, whereas the methyl group in 2 resonates δH 1.3. Such a discrepancy may be due to a reversed stereochemistry at C-3 or C-6. To the best of our knowledge, compound 2 is a new natural product.

Table 2.

1H NMR and 13C NMR spectral data for compound 2.

Position δH δC
2 174.0, C
3 68.5, C
4 2.50—2.57, m 44.4, CH2
5 5a, 1.64, dd (J = 7.1, 11.8) 43.8, CH2
5b, 1.90, dd (J = 1.8, 11.8)
6 4.77, m 75.6, CH
7 1.37, d (J = 6.4) 21.8, CH3
8 1.30, s 29.8, CH3

aData were measured in MeOD-d4 at 400 MHz for 1H NMR and 100 MHz for 13C NMR. The δ values are expressed in ppm and the coupling constants (J) in Hz. The assignments were made on the basis of DEPT, 1H—1H COSY, HSQC and HMBC results.

The structures of other compounds isolated from I. angustisepalum were determined by detailed examination of their spectroscopic data and comparison with published values. They were identified to be majusanic acids B (3) and C (4)12, angustanoic acids E (5), F (6), G (8)4, angustanol (7)4, (—)-τ-muurolol (9)13, clovane-2β,9α-diol (10)14, angustisepalin (11)5, majucin (12)15, 6β-hydroxy-4-stigmasten-3-one (13)16, thymol (14)17, 2,6-dimethoxychavicol (6-methoxyeugenol, 15)18 and (+)-taxifolin (dihydroquercetin, 16)19. With the exception of 38 and 11, other compounds are reported from I. angustisepalum for the first time.

In order to establish the biological profile of I. angustisepalum and the isolates, they were evaluated in a battery of testing models as follows.

2.1. Cytotoxicity study

All compounds were tested in three cell lines, i.e. MDA-MB-435 human melanoma cancer cells, MDA-MB-231 human breast cancer cells and OVCAR3 human ovarian cancer cells, using vinblastine as positive control. None of the compound displayed cytotoxic activity (IC50>25 µg/mL). These results were consistent with the non-cytotoxic property previously reported for angustanoic acids B and E, angustanol and other similar compounds12, 20.

2.2. Antimicrobial activity evaluation

Isolated compounds from I. angustisepalum were tested against clinical isolates of antibiotic resistant strains. Among them, angustanoic acid E (5) was the most active against Escherichia coli BW25113 ∆TolC (MIC 21 µmol/L), Staphylococcus aureus USA 300 (MIC 42 µmol/L), and S. aureus MSSA 476 (MIC 42 µmol/L). It was also active against Bacillus anthracis sterne and Bacillus cereus 14579 with MIC of 21 µmol/L, but was inactive against Acinetobacter calcoaceticus. On the other hand, majusanic acid C (4) and angustanoic acids F (6) and G (8) displayed MIC of 75, 75, and 150 µmol/L, respectively, against E. coli BW25113 ∆TolC. In the literature, angustanoic acids (e.g. angustanoic acid F)21 and majusanic acids (e.g. majusanic acids B, D, E and F)22 have shown to possess antiviral activity against Coxsackie B viruses.

2.3. Neuroprotection activity study

Investigation of bioprotection was evaluated in pheochromocytoma PC12 cells against damages induced by 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium (MPP+). The most significant protection against MPP+ damage was exerted by angustanoic acid G (8) at 1.3 µmol/L, comparable to the positive control AOP-6A (at a concentration of 16 µmol/L). Moderate protective effect was also observed for majusanic acid C (4), angustanoic acid E (5), (—)-τ-muurolol (9) and 2,6-dimethoxychavicol (15), at concentration range between 5—30 µmol/L. The neuroprotection activity may be related to their antioxidant property. It is interesting to note that, while majucin itself did not show significant neurotropic effect, some of the related seco-prezi-zaanes (such as jiadifenolide) were found to promote neurite outgrowth in PC12 cells23.

2.4. Acetylcholinesterase inhibitory activity evaluation

Using TLC bioautographic screening, both the volatile oil fraction and the EtOAc fraction of I. angustisepalum were active in inhibiting acetylcholinesterase activity. Thymol (14) was an active ingredient in the volatile fraction. The compound has been reported to exhibit anti-acetylcholinesterase activity (IC50 0.2 mg/mL)24. When the isolated compounds were tested in the same system, 3,6-dimethyl-3-hydroxy-tetrahydro-2H-pyran-2-one (2), clovane-2β,9α-diol (10), angustisepalin (11), 2,6-dimethoxychavicol (15), and taxifolin (16) displayed inhibitory activity. Among these compounds, taxifolin has been shown to strongly inhibit acetylcholinesterase at an IC50 of 30 nmol/L25. The inhibitory activity was further demonstrated using the Ellman׳s method, in which 10 and 14 exhibited the best results with IC50 values of 45 and 90 µmol/L, respectively.

3. Conclusions

The twigs of I. angustisepalum afforded sixteen compounds in the present phytochemical study. Several of these secondary metabolites displayed in vitro activities in anti-microbial, neuroprotection and anti-acetylcholinesterase test models. As a whole, I. angustisepalum is an under-exploited plant species; more in-depth studies are warranted in order to fully evaluate its potentials.

4. Experimental

4.1. General experimental procedures

All solvents used were analytical or HPLC grade. TLC: Merck aluminium backed sheets coated with 60F254 silica gel or 60F254 RP-silica gel; visualization by using a UV lamp (λmax 254 nm), and spraying with Komarowsky reagent (a mixture of 2% 4-hydroxybenzaldehyde MeOH and 5% H2SO4/EtOH, 10:1 (v/v)), followed by heating. Open column chromatography: silica gel (SiO2), MCI gel CPH20P (Supelco, Sigma--Aldrich, USA) or Sephadex LH-20 (GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences AB, Sweden). For HPLC purification, a C18 semi-preparative HPLC column (Phenomenex C18 column, 250 mm ×10 mm, 5 mm) and a Shimadzu UFLC system were used; the UV detection wavelength and flow rate were set at 254 nm and 4 mL/min, respectively. Optical rotations: at Na D line; Perkin-Elmer 241 digital polarimeter using quartz cell with a path length of 100 mm. NMR Spectra: Bruker DPX-400 spectrometer; chemical shifts (δ) in ppm using residual solvent as the internal standard (DMSO-d6: 2.50 ppm for 1H NMR and 39.51 ppm for 13C NMR; CDCl3: 7.24 ppm for 1H NMR and 77.23 ppm for 13C NMR; methanol-d4: 3.31, 4.78 ppm for 1H NMR and 49.2 ppm for 13C NMR); coupling constants (J) in Hz. HR-ESI-MS: Shimadzu LC—MS-IT-TOF mass spectrometer.

4.2. Plant material

Twigs of I. angustisepalum were collected in spring 2011 from Lantau Island, Hong Kong (China) by one of the author (Ming Zhao) and authenticated by Miss Yuying Zong of the School of Chinese Medicine, the Chinese University of Hong Kong. Voucher specimens were deposited at the same institute. Fresh twigs were cut into small pieces, dried under sun and milled into fine powder.

4.3. Extraction and isolation

The pulverized twigs (1 kg) were exhaustively extracted by percolation with 90% EtOH at room temperature and dried under reduced pressure. The dried extract (232 g) was partitioned into petroleum ether-soluble (39 g), ethyl acetate-soluble (50 g), butanol-soluble (63 g) and water-soluble (78 g) fractions. The ethyl acetate-soluble part was separated into 47 fractions by a flash column of SiO2 eluted by mixtures of petroleum ether and EtOAc (100:0 to 0:100). Sixteen compounds (116) were purified following repeated column chromatography and semi-preparative HPLC.

4.3.1. 3-O-Benzoyl-myrcenediol (1)

Colorless amorphous powder, 2 mg; [α]D25 + 1.4° (c 0.07, MeOH); IR (film) νmax 3429, 2971, 2936, 2366, 2342, 1713, 1275, 1119, 716 cm—1; 1H NMR and 13C NMR data, see Table 1; HR-ESI-MS m/z 275.1569 ([M+H]+, Calcd. for C17H23O3, 275.1647).

4.3.2. 3,6-Dimethyl-3-hydroxy-tetrahydro-2H-pyran-2-one (2)

Yellow oil, 1.5 mg; [α]D25 —2.2° (c 0.28, MeOH); IR (film) νmax 3366, 2970, 2933, 1779, 1705, 1378, 1247, 1122 cm—1; 1H NMR and 13C NMR data, see Table 2; HR-ESI-MS m/z 145.0866 ([M+H]+, Calcd. for C7H13O3, 145.0861).

4.3.3. Majusanic acid B (3)

Colorless amorphous powder, 8 mg; [α]D25 + 75.75° (c 0.8, MeOH); IR (film) νmax 3400, 2958, 2934, 1701, 1046, 1025, 1000 cm—1; HR-ESI-MS m/z 332.1988 ([M+H]+, Calcd. for C20H28O4, 332.1980).

4.3.4. Majusanic acid C (4)

Colorless amorphous powder, 11 mg; [α]D25 + 88.0° (c 0.1, MeOH); IR νmax 2964, 2931, 1692, 1471, 1256, 1171, 1147, 1071, 755 cm—1; HR-ESI-MS m/z 330.2195 ([M+H]+; Calcd. for C21H30O3, 330.2187).

4.3.5. Angustanoic acid E (5)

Colorless amorphous powder, 9 mg; [α]D25 + 22.1° (c 0.19, MeOH); IR (film) νmax 2956, 2931, 2850, 1695, 1437, 1231, 108, 950, 888 cm—1; HR-ESI-MS m/z 299.2004 ([M+H]+, Calcd. for C20H27O2, 299.2004).

4.3.6. Angustanoic acid F (6)

Colorless crystal, 10 mg; [α]D25 + 88.0° (c 0.1, MeOH); IR (film) νmax 3400, 2962, 2930, 1706, 1436, 1230, 1155, 1017, 951 cm—1; HR-ESI-MS m/z 315.1966 ([M—H], Calcd. for C20H27O3, 315.1953).

4.3.7. Angustanol (7)

Colorless amorphous powder, 24 mg; [α]D25 + 9.0° (c 0.1, acetone); IR (film) νmax 3357, 2960, 2931, 2906, 2871, 1697, 1455, 1375, 1139, 1041 cm—1; HR-ESI-MS m/z 302.2244 ([M+H]+, Calcd. for C20H30O2, 302.2238).

4.3.8. Angustanoic acid G (8)

Colorless crystal, 27 mg; [α]D25 + 135.3° (c 0.17, MeOH); IR (film) νmax 2932, 1706, 1677, 1271, 1017, 951 cm—1; HR-ESI-MS m/z 301.1786 ([M+H]+, Calcd. for C19H25O3, 301.1797).

4.3.9. (—)-τ-Muurolol (9)

Yellow oil, 6 mg; [α]D25 —70.0° (c 0.1, DCM); IR (film) νmax 3345, 2957, 2932, 2907, 2870, 1713, 1668, 1454, 1369, 1019, 952 cm—1; HR-ESI-MS m/z 205.1948 ([M—H2O+H]+, Calcd. for C15H25, 205.1950).

4.3.10. Clovane-2,9-diol (10)

Colorless amorphous powder, 58 mg; [α]D25 —5.0° (c 0.08, CHCl3); IR (film) νmax 3366, 2920, 2851, 1744, 1718, 1463, 1367, 1245, 1073 cm—1; HR-ESI-MS m/z 238.1933 ([M+H]+, Calcd. for C15H26O2, 238.1926).

4.3.11. Angustisepalin (11)

Colorless amorphous powder, 30 mg; [α]D25 —33.3° (c 0.06, CHCl3); IR (film) νmax 3480, 2955, 1785, 1754, 1731, 1451, 1372, 1250, 1178, 1091, 711 cm—1; HR-ESI-MS m/z 417.1532 ([M+H]+, Calcd. for C22H25O8, 417.1542).

4.3.12. Majucin (12)

Colorless crystal, 9 mg; [α]D25 —71.4° (c 0.22, MeOH); IR (film) νmax 3453, 2939, 2874, 1770, 1731, 1510, 1453, 1372, 1211, 1123, 1008 cm—1; HR-ESI-MS m/z 328.1158 ([M+H]+, Calcd. for C15H20O8, 328.1152).

4.3.13. 6β-Hydroxy-4-stigmasten-3-one (13)

Colorless crystal, 3 mg; [α]D25 + 1.42° (c 0.07, MeOH); IR (film) νmax 3400, 2918, 2849, 2359, 1341 cm—1; HR-ESI-MS m/z 429.3586 ([M+H]+, Calcd. for C29H49O2, 429.3720).

4.3.14. Thymol (14)

Colorless powder, 9 mg. The identity of thymol was confirmed by means of co-TLC with a reference standard (Sigma—Aldrich) and also by analysis of GC—MS data. In the TLC analysis, the Rf values of 14 and the reference standard were both 0.9 after elution with petroleum ether–ethyl acetate (6:4). The GC chromatogram displayed signal at 12.67 and 12.66 min, respectively, for 14 and the reference standard. GC—MS revealed the presence of [M+H]+ at m/z 150.00 for both compounds.

4.3.15. 2,6-Dimethoxychavicol (15)

Yellow oil, 30 mg; [α]D25 —0.3° (c 0.69, MeOH); IR (film) νmax 3443, 2937, 1613, 1515, 1459, 1428, 1328, 1239, 1213, 1119 cm—1; HR-ESI-MS m/z 194.0943 ([M+H]+, Calcd. for C11H14O3, 194.0939).

4.3.16. (+)-Taxifolin (16)

Yellow amorphous powder, 57 mg; [α]D25 + 18.0° (c 0.5, acetone); IR (film) νmax 3344, 1638, 1469, 1283, 1162, 1086 cm—1; HR-ESI-MS m/z 303.0502 ([M—H], Calcd. for C15H11O7, 303.0501).

4.4. Cytotoxicity assay

Cancer cell lines were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA, USA), and the assay procedures previously described were adopted26.

4.5. Antibacterial assay

The antibacterial activity against strains of A. calcoaceticus, B. anthracis sterne, B. cereus 14579, Enterococcus faecalis V583, E. coli MG1655, E. coli BW25113 ∆TolC, S. aureus USA 300, and S. aureus MSSA 476, were performed according to established procedures27.

4.6. Neuroprotection assay

PC12 cells were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Rockville, MD, USA) and treated as previously described28. The cells were seeded onto 96-well culture plates at a density of 2 × 104 cells/well, cultured in serum-free medium and incubated for 24 h in the presence or absence of MPP+ (500 µmol/L) and test compounds. Cell viability was measured using a CellTiter 96 AQueous One Solution Cell Proliferation Assay (Promega, Madison, WI, USA).

4.7. Acetylcholinesterase inhibition assays

Two assays were performed to test for anti-acetylcholinesterase activity. The TLC-autobiographic assay was performed according to the modified Marston׳s method29, 30. For detection, Fast Blue B salt solution was sprayed onto the TLC plate to give a purple coloration. Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors produced white spots on the purple background. A microplate assay was also adopted from the Ellman׳s method31. Enzyme inhibition was expressed as pIC50 (negative logarithms of molar concentrations of inhibitor required to decrease acetylcholinesterase activity by 50%). The percent of inhibition was calculated relative to a blank.

Acknowledgments

Technical support and assistance from Dr. Aleksjej Krunic and Dr. Benjamin Ramirez (NMR), Dr. Jerry White (MS), Dr. Weilun Chen and Dr. Joanna Burdette (cytotoxicity assay), and Dr. Hyunwoo Lee (antimicrobial assay) are acknowledged.

Footnotes

Peer review under responsibility of Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Chinese Pharmaceutical Association.

References

  • 1.Wang H., He H.J., Chen J.Q., Lu L. Palynological data on Illiciaceae and Schisandraceae confirm phylogenetic relationships within these two basally-branching angiosperm families. Flora. 2010;205:221–228. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.The Angiosperm Phylogeny Group An update of the angiosperm phylogeny group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG III. Bot J Linn Soc. 2009;161:105–121. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Liu Y.N., Su X.H., Huo C.H., Zhang X.P., Shi Q.W., Gu Y.C. Chemical constituents of plants from the genus Illicium. Chem Biodivers. 2009;6:963–1144. doi: 10.1002/cbdv.200700433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sy L.K., Brown G.D. Abietane diterpenes from Illicium angustisepalum. J Nat Prod. 1998;61:907–912. doi: 10.1021/np980054a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sy L.K., Brown G.D. A prezizaane sesquiterpene from Illicium angustisepalum. Phytochemistry. 1998;49:1715–1717. doi: 10.1016/s0031-9422(98)00299-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Zhao C., He L., Zhang L.Y., Shan M. Anti-inflammatory and analgesic effects of two extracts isolated from Illicium. Chin J Nat Med. 2009;7:307–311. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Barrero A.F., Sánchez J.F., Altarejos J., Zafra M.J. Homoditerpenes from the essential oil of Tanacetum annuum. Phytochemistry. 1992;31:1727–1730. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bohlmann F., Ahmed M., King R.M., Robinson H. Acetylenic compounds from Bidens graveolens. Phytochemistry. 1983;22:1281–1283. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Fournier-Nguefack C., Lhoste P., Sinou D. Palladium(0)-catalysed synthesis of cis- and trans-linalyl oxides. Tetrahedron. 1997;53:4353–4362. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Braddock D.C., Gao A.X., White A.J., Whyte M. Studies towards the synthesis of halomon: asymmetric hexafunctionalisation of myrcene. Chem Commun. 2014;50:13725–13728. doi: 10.1039/c4cc06234e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lee A.L., Malcolmson S.J., Puglisi A., Schrock R.R., Hoveyda A.H. Enantioselective synthesis of cyclic enol ethers and all-carbon quaternary stereogenic centers through catalytic asymmetric ring-closing metathesis. J Am Chem Soc. 2006;128:5153–5157. doi: 10.1021/ja058428r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Fang Z.F., Zhang G.J., Chen H., Bai J., Yu S.S., Liu Y. Diterpenoids and sesquiterpenoids from the twigs and leaves of Illicium majus. Planta Med. 2013;79:142–149. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1328056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ding L., Pfoh R., Rühl S., Qin S., Laatsch H. T-Muurolol sesquiterpenes from the marine Streptomyces sp. M491 and revision of the configuration of previously reported amorphanes. J Nat Prod. 2009;72:99–101. doi: 10.1021/np8006843. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Heymann H., Tezuka Y., Kikuchi T., Supriyatna S. Constituents of Sindora sumatrana MIQ. I. Isolation and NMR spectral analysis of sesquiterpenes from the dried pods. Chem Pharm Bull. 1994;42:138–146. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kouno I., Baba N., Hashimoto M., Kawano N., Takahashi M., Kaneto H. Isolation of three new sesquiterpene lactones from the pericarps of Illicium majus. Chem Pharm Bull. 1989;37:2448–2451. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Feng J.T., Shi Y.P. Steroids from Saussurea ussuriensis. Pharmazie. 2005;60:464–467. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ali M.S., Saleem M., Ahmad V.U. Zatatriol: a new aromatic constituent from Zataria multiflora. Z Naturforsch B: Chem Sci. 1999;54:807–810. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sy L.K., Saunders R.M., Brown G.D. Phytochemistry of Illicium dunnianum and the systematic position of the Illiciaceae. Phytochemistry. 1997;44:1099–1108. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kiehlmann E., Slade P.W. Methylation of dihydroquercetin acetates: synthesis of 5-O-methyldihydroquercetin. J Nat Prod. 2003;66:1562–1566. doi: 10.1021/np034005w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Gao Y.P., Shen Y.H., Zhang W.D. Two novel abietane diterpenoids from Illicium wardii A.C.SM. Helv Chim Acta. 2014;97:122–127. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zhang G.J., Li Y.H., Jiang J.D., Yu S.S., Qu J., Ma S.G. Anti-Coxsackie virus B diterpenes from the roots of Illicium jiadifengpi. Tetrahedron. 2013;69:1017–1023. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Wang Y.D., Zhang G.J., Qu J., Li Y.H., Jiang J.D., Liu Y.B. Diterpenoids and sesquiterpenoids from the roots of Illicium majus. J Nat Prod. 2013;76:1976–1983. doi: 10.1021/np400638r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Trzoss L., Xu J., Lacoske M.H., Mobley W.C., Theodorakis E.A. Illicium sesquiterpenes: divergent synthetic strategy and neurotrophic activity studies. Chem Eur J. 2013;19:6398–6408. doi: 10.1002/chem.201300198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Aazza S., Lyoussi B., Miguel M.G. Antioxidant and antiacetylcholinesterase activities of some commercial essential oils and their major compounds. Molecules. 2011;16:7672–7690. doi: 10.3390/molecules16097672. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Gocer H., Topal F., Topal M., Küçük M., Teke D., Gülçin I. Acetylcholinesterase and carbonic anhydrase isoenzymes I and II inhibition profiles of taxifolin. J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem. 2016;31:441–447. doi: 10.3109/14756366.2015.1036051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Zhao M., Onakpa M.M., Chen W.L., Santarsiero B.D., Swanson S.M., Burdette J.E. 17-Norpimaranes and (9βH)-17-norpimaranes from the tuber of Icacina trichantha. J Nat Prod. 2015;78:789–796. doi: 10.1021/np5010328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Wiegand I., Hilpert K., Hancock R.E. Agar and broth dilution methods to determine the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of antimicrobial substances. Nat Protoc. 2008;3:163–175. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2007.521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Mao Q.Q., Xian Y.F., Ip S.P., Tsai S.H., Che C.T. Protective effects of peony glycosides against corticosterone-induced cell death in PC12 cells through antioxidant action. J Ethnopharmacol. 2011;133:1121–1125. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2010.11.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Marston A., Kissling J., Hostettmann K. A rapid TLC bioautographic method for the detection of acetylcholinesterase and butyrylcholinesterase inhibitors in plants. Phytochem Anal. 2002;13:51–54. doi: 10.1002/pca.623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Yang Z., Zhang X., Duan D., Song Z., Yang M., Li S. Modified TLC bioautographic method for screening acetylcholinesterase inhibitors from plant extracts. J Sep Sci. 2009;32:3257–3259. doi: 10.1002/jssc.200900266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Adhami H.R., Scherer U., Kaehlig H., Hettich T., Schlotterbeck G., Reich E. Combination of bioautography with HPTLC–MS/NMR: a fast identification of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors from galbanum. Phytochem Anal. 2013;24:395–400. doi: 10.1002/pca.2422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica. B are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES