Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Nov 4;11(1):5–7. doi: 10.1080/17474124.2017.1253474

Altered glycosyltransferases in colorectal cancer

Srividya Venkitachalam 1, Kishore Guda 1,*
PMCID: PMC5520968  NIHMSID: NIHMS880823  PMID: 27781489

The cellular glycome, comprised of the entire spectrum of glycan structures, is immensely complex and has gained increasing interest due to its ability to influence and regulate key cellular processes like cell adhesion, migration, cell-cell recognition and immune surveillance [1]. Glycosylation, the addition of defined sugars to proteins and lipids, occurs in the Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) or the Golgi apparatus [2] and is catalyzed by the collective action of a family of enzymes (glycosyltransferases) that transfer sugar residues from nucleotide-sugar donors to lipid protein or sugar acceptors, and enzymes (glycosidases) that catalyze the hydrolysis of glycosidic linkages [3, 4]. The process is highly substrate-, site-, and context-specific, and leads to the formation of highly complex glycan structures that can be distinguished as N-linked or O-linked based on addition of the sugars onto side chains of Asn or Ser/Thr residues, respectively [4, 5]. A multitude of glycosyltransferase enzymes catalyze the different glycan biosynthetic pathways, resulting in the formation of a glycocode that bears key information for critical cellular functions involved in biologic homeostasis [6]. Of note, a single glycosyltransferase can often be involved in a variety of glycosylation sub-network pathways [1].

Aberrations in N- and/or O-linked glycosylation can perturb the cellular glycan structures and severely hinder the normal functioning of proteins and lipids involved in critical biological processes [4, 5]. Indeed, altered N- and/or O-linked glycosylation is a hall mark of several cancers, including colorectal cancer, that promote tumor progression and metastasis [4, 5]. While aberrant glycosylation patterns have led to the identification of several cancer-associated antigens many of which are glycoconjugates [4], the molecular basis for aberrant glycosylation in cancer and the underlying mechanisms by which they contribute to tumor progression however remains poorly understood.

Some of the causative factors underlying altered protein glycosylation in cancers include aberrant expression levels of glycosyltransferases, altered localization of glycosyltransferases within subcellular compartments, bioavailability of protein substrates, and/or the absence of necessary cofactors that aid in normal glyco-biogenesis [1, 4, 5]. In particular, our previous studies in familial and sporadic colorectal cancers (CRCs) identified functionally-inactivating germline and somatic mutations in the gene encoding for GALNT12 (Polypeptide N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 12) [7], suggesting that aberrant glycosylation in cancers could stem from genetic defects in the glycosyltransferase genes. These findings prompted us to undertake an in-depth characterization of CRC-associated mutational alterations in genes encoding glycosylation enzymes using targeted next-generation sequencing [8]. Of the 430 glycosylation-associated genes assessed, 36 genes exhibited mutational alterations (missense, nonsense, splice site and frameshift mutations) in colorectal cancers, with 12 genes displaying significantly higher mutation rates than the expected background rate in CRCs [8]. Interestingly, further enrichment analysis of the 12 genes showed that three genes, B3GNT2 (β-1,3-N Acetylglucosaminyltransferase 2), B4GALT2 (β-1,4-Galactosyltransferase 2) and ST6GALNAC2 (α-N-Acetylgalactosaminidyl α-2,6-Sialyltransferase 2), belonged to polylactosamine and N- and O-glycosylation pathway [8]. While B3GNT2 and B4GALT2 are involved in polyLacNAc biosynthesis on N-linked tetraantennary structures and on Core 1, 2 and 3 O-glycan core structures [9, 10, 11], ST6GALNAC2 terminates glycan chain elongation by the addition of sialic acid to the peptide GalNAc of O-glycan Core 1 or Core 3 structures [10, 12]. Similar to GALNT12, mutations in these three genes predominantly mapped to the catalytic domain of respective enzymes [8]. Biochemical analyses of wild-type and mutant B3GNT2, ST6GALNAC2, and B4GALT2 demonstrated significant alterations in respective glycosyltransferase function [8]. For instance, mutations in B3GNT2 led to either loss of enzymatic function or mislocalization of the protein. Genomic loss of the wild type allele in B4GALT2 was accompanied by a missense mutation that disrupted the post translation modification pattern of the B4GALT2 protein [8] and finally, mutant ST6GALNAC2 consistently showed hyper enzyme activity [8] as compared to its wild-type counterpart.

GALNT12, B3GNT2, B4GALT2 and ST6GALNAC2 are enzymes involved in mucin type O-glycosylation and catalyze the formation of complex O-glycan structures [10]. While the endogenous substrates of these enzymes remain to be determined, given that an individual glycosyltransferase enzyme may be involved in the post-translational modification and maturation of multiple protein-substrates, it is possible that genetic alterations in glycosylation pathway genes may accordingly affect a multitude of proteins, through loss-of function, dominant negative or gain of function mechanisms. This can be considered comparable to the paradigm where a single microRNA can regulate multiple transcripts; defects in these microRNAs can therefore alter the expression of multiple target-genes. Glycosylation defects, either in the form of impaired glycan synthesis or abnormal glycan structures, could likewise affect the regulation and function of several different proteins and signaling molecules. For example, GALNT12 catalyzes the initiation step of mucin type O-linked glycosylation [13]. Mucins are a group of glycoproteins with extensive O-glycan side chains that are highly expressed in normal intestinal tissue, alterations of which can lead to disease conditions such as cancer [14]. Indeed, increased levels of unglycosylated MUC1 (Mucin-1) protein was observed in colorectal cancers bearing the GALNT12 mutations [7]. In addition, hypoglycosylation of MUC1 is known to affect protein stability and subcellular localization and may initiate oncogenic signaling [15], while MUC2 (Mucin-2) deficient mice are observed to spontaneously develop colorectal tumors likely due to increased inflammation in the colonic mucosa [14]. Similarly, B3GNT2, B4GALT2 and ST6GALNAC2 are essential in formation of O-glycan core 1, 2, and 3, structures. O-Glycans are classified into different Core groups and expression levels of Core 1, 2 and 3 structures are deregulated in different cancers [16]. For example, the tumor associated Tn antigen is a modified Core 1 O-glycan that is expressed in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas; formation of these incomplete Core 1 glycans are attributed to mutations in C1GALT1 specific chaperone 1 (COSMC), a chaperone protein that regulates the activity of Core 1 beta 1,3-galactosyltransferase 1 involved in Tn antigen elongation process [17]. On the other hand, the Core 3 glycans are of particular interest since they are primarily expressed in the gastrointestinal tissues, and are the primary structures of mucin-type glycoproteins [16]. Core 3 O-glycans help regulate intestinal homeostasis and alterations in Core 3 O-glycan structure has been implicated in CRC development [14, 16]. For example, decreased expression of Core 3 structures is frequently observed in colorectal cancers and loss of Core 3 synthase expression is associated with the grade of colon neoplasia in familial adenomatous polyposis patients [16]. Furthermore, loss of Core 3 synthase activity enhances metastasis of colon carcinoma cells [16] and mice deficient in Core 3 O-glycans are highly susceptible to colitis and colon adenocarcinoma [18]. Consistent with these reports, our phenotypic functional studies demonstrated mutant B3GNT2 and ST6GALNAC2 glycosyltransferases as having a significant impact on the migratory potential of colon carcinoma cells [8]. Specifically, mutations in B3GNT2 result in a gain of oncogenic function, likely owing to altered surface polyLacNAc residues that have been suggested to play a role in migration and metastasis [19]. In contrast, mutant ST6GALNAC2 proteins were unable to suppress the migration of colon cancer cells, an observation that is analogous to previous reports of ST6GALNAC2’s function as a metastasis suppressor gene in breast cancer [20]. Collectively, these findings strongly suggest that genetic defects in the mucin-type O-glycosylation pathway contribute to the progression of a subset of colorectal cancers.

Interestingly, given previous findings from our group and others [7, 21] demonstrating a strong association between germline defects in GALNT12 and colorectal cancers, it is possible that inherent defects in glycosyltransferase genes also potentially play a role in susceptibility to familial forms of colorectal cancer. In fact, estimates suggest that up to 20% of CRC cases have an inherited susceptibility to colorectal cancer; albeit the underlying genetic defects remain to be identified [22]. Our recent findings of additional mutated genes in the O-glycosylation pathway [8] will now allow us to further explore the contribution of glycosylation pathway defects to inherited colorectal cancer susceptibility.

Taken together, while genetic defects in the glycosylation pathway could be one of the underlying mechanisms contributing to aberrant glycosylation, deciphering the endogenous substrates of glycosyltransferases and the functional complexities associated with protein glycosylation will significantly aid in understanding the precise role of aberrant glycosylation in tumor pathogenesis [23]. In addition, recent advances in integrative peptide fragmentation, glycopeptide extraction and high-throughput mass spectrophotometry for quantitatively analyzing global tumor glycan structures [24, 25] should further enable the development of evidence-based biomarkers and new therapeutic strategies for cancers.

Acknowledgments

Funding

The authors were supported by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the National Institute of Health and the National Cancer Institute (grant numbers K08 CA148980, P50 CA150964, R01 CA204549, U01 CA152756, U54 CA163060).

Footnotes

Declaration of Interest

The authors are affiliated with the National Institute of Health and the National Cancer Institute. The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed.

References

  • 1.Pinho SS, Reis CA. Glycosylation in cancer: mechanisms and clinical implications. Nature reviews Cancer. 2015;15:540–55. doi: 10.1038/nrc3982. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Gill DJ, Clausen H, Bard F. Location, location, location: new insights into O-GalNAc protein glycosylation. Trends Cell Biol. 2011;21:149–58. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2010.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Meany DL, Chan DW. Aberrant glycosylation associated with enzymes as cancer biomarkers. Clin Proteomics. 2011;8:7. doi: 10.1186/1559-0275-8-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Stowell SR, Ju T, Cummings RD. Protein glycosylation in cancer. Annu Rev Pathol. 2015;10:473–510. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pathol-012414-040438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Varki A. Biological Roles of Glycans. Glycobiology. 2016 doi: 10.1093/glycob/cww086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gabius HJ. The magic of the sugar code. Trends Biochem Sci. 2015;40:341. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2015.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Guda K, Moinova H, He J, Jamison O, Ravi L, Natale L, Lutterbaugh J, Lawrence E, Lewis S, Willson JK, Lowe JB, Wiesner GL, Parmigiani G, Barnholtz-Sloan J, Dawson DW, Velculescu VE, Kinzler KW, Papadopoulos N, Vogelstein B, Willis J, Gerken TA, Markowitz SD. Inactivating germ-line and somatic mutations in polypeptide N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 12 in human colon cancers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2009;106:12921–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0901454106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Venkitachalam S, Revoredo L, Varadan V, Fecteau RE, Ravi L, Lutterbaugh J, Markowitz SD, Willis JE, Gerken TA, Guda K. Biochemical and functional characterization of glycosylation-associated mutational landscapes in colon cancer. Scientific reports. 2016;6:23642. doi: 10.1038/srep23642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Almeida R, Amado M, David L, Levery SB, Holmes EH, Merkx G, van Kessel AG, Rygaard E, Hassan H, Bennett E, Clausen H. A family of human beta4-galactosyltransferases. Cloning and expression of two novel UDP-galactose:beta-n-acetylglucosamine beta1, 4-galactosyltransferases, beta4Gal-T2 and beta4Gal-T3. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:31979–91. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.51.31979. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Nairn AV, York WS, Harris K, Hall EM, Pierce JM, Moremen KW. Regulation of glycan structures in animal tissues: transcript profiling of glycan-related genes. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:17298–313. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M801964200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Togayachi A, Kozono Y, Kuno A, Ohkura T, Sato T, Hirabayashi J, Ikehara Y, Narimatsu H. Beta3GnT2 (B3GNT2), a major polylactosamine synthase: analysis of B3GNT2-deficient mice. Methods Enzymol. 2010;479:185–204. doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(10)79011-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kono M, Tsuda T, Ogata S, Takashima S, Liu H, Hamamoto T, Itzkowitz SH, Nishimura S, Tsuji S. Redefined substrate specificity of ST6GalNAc II: a second candidate sialyl-Tn synthase. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2000;272:94–7. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.2000.2745. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Guo JM, Zhang Y, Cheng L, Iwasaki H, Wang H, Kubota T, Tachibana K, Narimatsu H. Molecular cloning and characterization of a novel member of the UDP-GalNAc:polypeptide N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase family, pp-GalNAc-T12. FEBS letters. 2002;524:211–8. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(02)03007-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kawashima H. Roles of the gel-forming MUC2 mucin and its O-glycosylation in the protection against colitis and colorectal cancer. Biol Pharm Bull. 2012;35:1637–41. doi: 10.1248/bpb.b12-00412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Nath S, Mukherjee P. MUC1: a multifaceted oncoprotein with a key role in cancer progression. Trends in molecular medicine. 2014;20:332–42. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2014.02.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Iwai T, Kudo T, Kawamoto R, Kubota T, Togayachi A, Hiruma T, Okada T, Kawamoto T, Morozumi K, Narimatsu H. Core 3 synthase is down-regulated in colon carcinoma and profoundly suppresses the metastatic potential of carcinoma cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2005;102:4572–7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0407983102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hofmann BT, Schluter L, Lange P, Mercanoglu B, Ewald F, Folster A, Picksak AS, Harder S, El Gammal AT, Grupp K, Gungor C, Drenckhan A, Schluter H, Wagener C, Izbicki JR, Jucker M, Bockhorn M, Wolters-Eisfeld G. COSMC knockdown mediated aberrant O-glycosylation promotes oncogenic properties in pancreatic cancer. Mol Cancer. 2015;14:109. doi: 10.1186/s12943-015-0386-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.An G, Wei B, Xia B, McDaniel JM, Ju T, Cummings RD, Braun J, Xia L. Increased susceptibility to colitis and colorectal tumors in mice lacking core 3-derived O-glycans. J Exp Med. 2007;204:1417–29. doi: 10.1084/jem.20061929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kinoshita M, Mitsui Y, Kakoi N, Yamada K, Hayakawa T, Kakehi K. Common glycoproteins expressing polylactosamine-type glycans on matched patient primary and metastatic melanoma cells show different glycan profiles. J Proteome Res. 2014;13:1021–33. doi: 10.1021/pr401015b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Murugaesu N, Iravani M, van Weverwijk A, Ivetic A, Johnson DA, Antonopoulos A, Fearns A, Jamal-Hanjani M, Sims D, Fenwick K, Mitsopoulos C, Gao Q, Orr N, Zvelebil M, Haslam SM, Dell A, Yarwood H, Lord CJ, Ashworth A, Isacke CM. An in vivo functional screen identifies ST6GalNAc2 sialyltransferase as a breast cancer metastasis suppressor. Cancer Discov. 2014;4:304–17. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-13-0287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Clarke E, Green RC, Green JS, Mahoney K, Parfrey PS, Younghusband HB, Woods MO. Inherited deleterious variants in GALNT12 are associated with CRC susceptibility. Hum Mutat. 2012;33:1056–8. doi: 10.1002/humu.22088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Fearnhead NS, Wilding JL, Winney B, Tonks S, Bartlett S, Bicknell DC, Tomlinson IP, Mortensen NJ, Bodmer WF. Multiple rare variants in different genes account for multifactorial inherited susceptibility to colorectal adenomas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2004;101:15992–7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0407187101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Pearce OM, Laubli H. Sialic acids in cancer biology and immunity. Glycobiology. 2016;26:111–28. doi: 10.1093/glycob/cwv097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ford KL, Zeng W, Heazlewood JL, Bacic A. Characterization of protein N-glycosylation by tandem mass spectrometry using complementary fragmentation techniques. Front Plant Sci. 2015;6:674. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Li Y, Tian Y, Rezai T, Prakash A, Lopez MF, Chan DW, Zhang H. Simultaneous analysis of glycosylated and sialylated prostate-specific antigen revealing differential distribution of glycosylated prostate-specific antigen isoforms in prostate cancer tissues. Anal Chem. 2011;83:240–5. doi: 10.1021/ac102319g. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES