Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jul 21.
Published in final edited form as: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Mar;200(3):W304–W313. doi: 10.2214/AJR.12.8665

MRI of Carotid Atherosclerosis

William S Kerwin 1,2, Thomas Hatsukami 3, Chun Yuan 1, Xue-Qiao Zhao 4
PMCID: PMC5520985  NIHMSID: NIHMS875663  PMID: 23436876

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Although MRI is widely used to observe atherosclerosis impacts on the vessel lumen, MRI also depicts the size of the plaque itself, its composition, and plaque inflammation, providing information beyond simple stenosis. This article summarizes the state of evidence for a clinical role for MRI of carotid atherosclerosis.

CONCLUSION

MRI of carotid atherosclerosis has a proven role in pharmaceutical trials and may improve patient management once large-scale clinical trials have been completed.

Keywords: atherosclerosis, carotid artery, inflammation, MRI, neovasculature, plaque burden, plaque components


Atherosclerotic disease is the leading cause of death and disability in the United States and Europe [1, 2]. Histologic studies suggest that plaque morphology and composition are important determinants of plaque stability [310]. To use information on plaque morphology for diagnostic and other purposes, an imaging method is needed that can provide accurate assessment of plaque tissue components and activity in vivo.

For atherosclerotic plaques in the carotid arteries, the relatively large size of the vessel and superficial location have enabled the development of high-resolution MRI techniques in recent years for direct assessment of plaque tissue composition. Using histologic confirmation, numerous studies have shown that MRI exhibits high contrast for internal plaque features and that combined information from multiple contrast weightings is critical for distinguishing all plaque components [1116]. The purpose of this article is to summarize the current state of MRI of carotid atherosclerosis and to discuss the potential utility of MRI in clinical practice and research.

Pathogenesis of Atherosclerotic Plaques

Carotid atherosclerosis is often a relatively benign disease that progresses with aging, but it can be accompanied by acute thrombosis, embolization, and subsequent stroke. Histopathologic studies comparing coronary and carotid artery disease suggest similar pathways leading to thrombotic events, most commonly caused by ulceration or rupture of the fibrous cap overlying a thrombogenic lipid-rich necrotic core [3] (Fig. 1). In a study of more than 500 carotid endarterectomy (CEA) specimens in patients with prior cerebral ischemic symptoms, 58% exhibited rupture of the fibrous cap [4]. A combined analysis of several smaller studies comparing specimens from symptomatic versus asymptomatic patients showed those with symptoms had significantly higher prevalence of ruptured caps (48% vs 31%, p < 0.001) [5].

Fig. 1. Histologic features of advanced carotid atherosclerotic plaque.

Fig. 1

A and B, Photomicrographs show thin fibrous cap (A) and thick fibrous cap (B). NC = necrotic core. (Reprinted with permission from [3])

The risk of fibrous cap rupture appears to be influenced by several factors. In symptomatic patients, a minimum cap thickness under 200 μm was associated with an odds ratio of 5.0 for the presence of fibrous cap rupture [6]. Larger necrotic core size, presence of intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH), and inflammatory cell infiltration of the cap were also found to be predictive of cap rupture [4]. With the exception of cap inflammation, however, these other plaque features have shown mixed results for differentiating symptomatic and asymptomatic patients [5, 7]. Little difference in size of the necrotic core has been observed between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients, but the necrotic core appears significantly closer to the lumen in those with symptoms [8]. Finally, plaque neovascularization, which is often associated with inflammation, has been shown to distinguish symptomatic and asymptomatic plaques [9, 10]. Immature neovessels are also thought to be a source of IPH [17].

In addition to cap rupture, a handful of other mechanisms for thrombosis have been reported. Endothelial erosions, a common source of thrombus in the coronary circulation, are reported to be rare in the carotid arteries [3]. Calcified nodules leading to luminal thrombus were found to be more frequently associated with carotid artery disease than coronary events, although still accounting for a small fraction of total events [3]. Calcified nodules that protrude into the lumen are distinguished from most plaque calcifications, which are separated from the lumen by fibrous tissue and may be indicative of stable lesions [18]. These differences between carotid and coronary lesions suggest differences in pathogenesis that merit further study.

Carotid atherosclerosis has also been described using a modified version of the American Heart Association (AHA) lesion types for coronary plaques [19, 20]. Among advanced lesions, types IV and V are at-risk lesions with a lipid-rich necrotic core. Type VI lesions are the most clinically relevant complex plaques with fibrous cap rupture, ulceration, or IPH. Types VII and VIII are predominantly calcific and fibrous, respectively, and are considered less prone to clinical sequelae.

MRI Techniques

Clinical MR angiography (MRA) is widely available, with time-of-flight (TOF) and contrast-enhanced MRA providing bright lumen signals suitable for measuring stenosis. MRA techniques can also be helpful for identification of ulcerations in the lumen surface [21]. However, MRA is unable to depict plaque burden, particularly in light of positive remodeling, nor is it able to detect high-risk components of the atherosclerotic plaque, with the potential exception of IPH [22]. For these purposes, multiple-contrast black-blood imaging techniques (Fig. 2) have been used for cross-sectional imaging of the artery wall [23].

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Cross-sectional appearance of carotid atherosclerotic plaque by common imaging techniques: 3D time-of-flight (TOF) MR angiography; T1-weighted (T1W) turbo spin-echo (TSE); contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (CE T1W) TSE; proton density–weighted (PDW) TSE; T2-weighted (T2W) TSE; and inversion recovery magnetization-prepared turbo field echo (IR TFE) (also called magnetization-prepared rapid gradient-echo [MP-RAGE]). MRI results suggest pathology consisting mainly of intraplaque hemorrhage appearing bright on T1-weighted and inversion recovery TFE images, with calcified plaque appearing dark on all images. (Reprinted with permission from [23])

In one study, in vivo vessel wall measurements from 33 carotid arteries obtained with a combination of T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and proton density–weighted MRI were compared with corresponding ex vivo measurements after CEA [24]. Vessel wall volumes and maximal areas were highly correlated (co-efficients in excess of 0.9) and differed by an amount consistent with the thin rim of the artery left in vivo after surgery. Using the same protocol, Saam et al. [15] provided guidelines for identifying calcification, lipid-rich necrotic core, and loose fibrous matrix based on relative signal intensities in each of the contrast weightings. In 214 matched cross-sectional locations, the measured areas of these components correlated with corresponding histologic measurements with coefficients in excess of 0.7. Improved signal-to-noise ratios at 3-T compared with 1.5-T field strength may further improve performance, although some subtle signal changes have been reported at higher field strengths [25].

The availability of gadolinium-based contrast agents has also been beneficial for MRI of atherosclerosis. Gadolinium agents have been found to preferentially enhance fibrous regions [26, 27]. This phenomenon allows MRI to make measurements of the fibrous cap that correlate with histology in patients with CEA and can be used to identify the lipid-rich necrotic core as a nonenhancing region [14]. Adding contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images to the protocol was found to reduce the interrater coefficient of variation for measuring lipid-rich necrotic core size from 33.5% to 17.6% [28].

Recently, technical developments have focused on the development of 3D sequences for MRI of atherosclerosis. The use of 3D sequences leads to improved signal-to-noise ratios; increased longitudinal coverage; improved resolution, especially in the through-plane direction; and greater acquisition efficiency. A key to developing 3D sequences has been the emergence of blood-suppression techniques that do not depend on through-plane flow to produce black-blood images. For example, Balu et al. [29] used motion-sensitized driven-equilibrium flow suppression with a FLASH readout to obtain 3D carotid artery images with 0.7-mm isotropic resolution. A similar black-blood preparation has also been combined with a steady-state free precession (SSFP) readout [30]. The sampling perfection with application optimized contrast using different flip angle evolution (SPACE) technique permits 3D spin-echo imaging with native blood suppression [31].

Specialized sequences targeting specific components of the atherosclerotic plaque have also been under development. The most notable target has been IPH, to which MRI is uniquely sensitive. Methemoglobin in IPH serves as an endogenous contrast agent leading to a shortened longitudinal relaxation constant T1 and hyperintensity on T1-weighted images. This hyperintense property of IPH has been noted on general-purpose T1-weighted images, including spin-echo and TOF acquisitions [16, 32]. The mask image from contrast-enhanced MRA acquisitions can also be used to detect IPH and has led to greater detection accuracy than TOF [22]. A heavily T1-weighted sequence using inversion recovery magnetization-prepared rapid gradient-echo (MP-RAGE) has also been proposed [33]. In a comparison of MP-RAGE with general-purpose T1-weighted sequences, Ota et al. [34] found that MP-RAGE had the best overall diagnostic accuracy compared with histology, achieving sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 97%. Further improvements have been proposed using phase-sensitive reconstruction to achieve higher IPH contrast and improved lumen differentiation [35]. This method was subsequently modified to provide simultaneous noncontrast angiography and IPH (fast gradient-echo [SNAP]) imaging, which has the potential to provide stenosis and IPH detection in a single imaging sequence [36].

Another specific imaging target in atherosclerosis has been inflammation, characterized by macrophage accumulation and related neovascularization. Ultrasmall superparamagnetic particles of iron oxide (USPIO) accumulate in macrophages over a period of 24–36 hours, yielding loss of signal intensity on subsequent images [37, 38]. In another example, dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging (DCE-MRI) after administration of gadolinium agents can be used to assess plaque perfusion arising from the adventitial vasa vasorum (Fig. 3). In a study of 16 subjects undergoing CEA, a correlation of 0.8 between estimates of fractional blood volume (vp) estimated by kinetic modeling of DCE-MRI and histologic measurements of neovessel area was found [39]. In a follow-up study, both vp and the transfer constant (Ktrans), which is sensitive to vessel permeability, were found to correlate with plaque macrophage content [40].

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Kinetic analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI of carotid atherosclerosis in 46-year-old man yields parametric image (top) displaying value of fractional blood volume (vp) in red and transfer constant (Ktrans) in green (adventitia indicated by arrows). Image is derived from kinetic modeling of changing intensity in serial images (bottom) coinciding with contrast agent injection. N denotes number from series. (Reprinted with permission from [73])

MRI also offers a number of novel contrast mechanisms other than relaxation that have also been explored for atherosclerosis imaging. Diffusion-weighted imaging of atherosclerosis yields quantitative estimates of the apparent diffusion coefficients, which have been found to be substantially lower in lipid rich cores compared with normal vessel wall or IPH [41]. Susceptibility-weighted imaging has been applied to peripheral arteries and found to have high accuracy for the detection of calcifications [42]. Finally, magnetization transfer imaging may be sensitive to the density of proteins [43].

Prevalence of High-Risk Plaque Features

Using MRI, high-risk plaque features, such as IPH and rupture, have commonly been identified in carotid arteries with minimal to moderate stenosis [44, 45]. By MRI criteria, up to a third of patients with asymptomatic 50–79% stenosis and approximately 10% with 16–49% stenosis have type VI lesions with evidence of cap rupture or IPH [46]. Even arteries with 0% stenosis can exhibit complex plaque, as indicated by a recent study that imaged carotid arteries contralateral to those with stenosis in excess of 50% [47]. Among the contralateral arteries exhibiting 0% stenosis by contrast-enhanced MRA, lipid-rich necrotic core was still present in 67.4% (31 of 46) of arteries, IPH was present in 8.7% (four of 46), and fibrous cap rupture was present in 4.3% (two of 46). These findings confirm that angiography underestimates carotid plaque burden [47, 48] (Fig. 4) and is ineffective in detecting the presence of complex plaque.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

A and B, Carotid artery MR angiograms (left) show no stenosis in 67-year-old woman with contralateral stenosis (A), nor in 62-year-old man with contralateral stenosis (B). Cross-sectional time-of-flight (TOF) unenhanced T1-weighted (Pre-T1), and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (Post-T1) MR images show that only B exhibits large plaque with lipid-rich necrotic core (arrows) and calcification (arrowheads). Asterisks indicate carotid artery lumen. (Reprinted with permission from [46])”

Numerous studies have also compared the prevalence of high-risk features in plaques implicated in cerebrovascular symptoms versus asymptomatic plaques. Reports have indicated that symptomatic plaques are more likely to exhibit MRI evidence of thin or ruptured fibrous caps, IPH, ulceration, or gadolinium enhancement of the adventitia [21, 22, 49, 50]. Saam et al. [51] compared symptomatic carotid plaques to contralateral asymptomatic plaques in the same individuals and found higher incidence of fibrous cap rupture (78% vs 30%) and complex lesions with IPH (63% vs 41%) on the symptomatic side. Murphy et al. [52] reported similar findings in a study of IPH alone (60% on the symptomatic side vs 36% on the asymptomatic side). In a group of 32 patients with stroke of unknown origin, AHA type VI carotid lesions were found on the symptomatic side in 37.5%, but none were found on the asymptomatic side [53]. In another investigation of type VI lesions in patients evaluated for acute cerebrovascular ischemic events, an odds ratio of 11.66 was reported for the finding of transient ischemic attack (TIA) or stroke on the side of the type VI lesion [54].

Plaque Characteristics and Clinical Outcome

The most significant development in MRI of atherosclerosis in recent years has been the completion of numerous studies relating baseline MRI characteristics of carotid atherosclerosis with clinically relevant outcomes. In the largest and most comprehensive study to date, Takaya et al. [55] tested the hypothesis that specific carotid plaque features are associated with a higher risk of subsequent TIA or stroke. This prospective observational study followed 154 subjects with 50–79% carotid stenosis who were asymptomatic at the time of enrollment for a mean follow-up period of 38.2 months. A total of 12 subjects developed cerebrovascular events (four strokes and eight TIAs) that were judged to be carotid related. Cox regression analysis showed significant associations between ischemic events and presence of a thin or ruptured fibrous cap (hazard ratio, 17.0; p < 0.001), IPH (hazard ratio, 5.2; p = 0.005), larger mean necrotic core area (hazard ratio for 10-mm2 increase, 1.6; p = 0.01), and maximal wall thickness (hazard ratio of 1-mm increase, 1.6; p = 0.008) (Fig. 5). The small size of this study, however, precluded multivariate analysis.

Fig. 5. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates for patients remaining free from cerebrovascular symptoms.

Fig. 5

A and B, Graphs show Kaplan-Meier survival estimates for patients remaining free from cerebrovascular symptoms with and without presence in carotid arteries of intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH) (A) and thin or ruptured fibrous cap (B) identified by MRI. (Reprinted with permission from [55])

The importance of IPH in particular in predicting cerebrovascular complications has been further shown in similar studies involving both symptomatic and asymptomatic cohorts. Among 91 initially asymptomatic men with 50–70% stenosis followed for a mean period of 25 months, all of the six cerebrovascular events occurred in arteries with IPH present at baseline (hazard ratio, 3.6; p < 0.001) [56]. Among 66 symptomatic patients with high-grade stenosis awaiting CEA, a hazard ratio of 4.8 (p < 0.05) for IPH predicting the 17 recurrent events was reported [57]. In another study, 64 symptomatic patients with 30–69% stenosis were followed for a mean period of 28 months [58]. At baseline, 39 (61%) showed IPH on MRI and of these, 13 developed ipsilateral ischemic events (eight TIAs and five strokes). Among those with no baseline IPH, only one TIA was reported (hazard ratio, 9.8; p = 0.03).

The importance of IPH identified by MRI also appears to be valuable for choosing among treatment options. In one study, the existence of hyperintense signal on T1-weighted images of carotid lesions was investigated in 56 patients undergoing carotid artery stenting versus 25 patients undergoing CEA [59]. Among patients positive for T1-weighted hyperintensity, those undergoing carotid artery stenting were significantly more likely to develop silent ischemic brain lesions than those receiving CEA (61% vs 13%, p = 0.006). Among 112 patients undergoing carotid artery stenting, the presence of hyperintense signals consistent with IPH on TOF images was found to yield significantly higher likelihood of periprocedural symptoms (18.4% vs 1.4%, p = 0.003) [60]. Thus, IPH identified by MRI may be helpful for determining the appropriateness of carotid artery stenting.

Serial carotid MRI has also been used to investigate the baseline plaque characteristics associated with important pathologic changes in the carotid plaque at follow-up. In a prospective, serial MRI study of 85 subjects with 50–79% stenosis and no luminal surface disruption at baseline, clinical and baseline carotid MRI plaque features were examined for associations with new fibrous cap disruption on follow-up MRI [61]. The size of the lipid-rich necrotic core at baseline was the strongest predictor for development of a new surface disruption at the 36-month follow-up (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.95). Presence of IPH was also a statistically significant, but weaker, classifier of new surface disruption (AUC = 0.73).

Prospective MRI investigations have also studied the role of plaque components in rate of progression of the atherosclerotic lesion. In particular, IPH may represent a potent atherogenic stimulus by contributing to the deposition of free cholesterol, macrophage infiltration, and enlargement of the necrotic core [17]. A case-control study of 29 subjects participating in a longitudinal serial MRI progression study tested the hypothesis that IPH, detected by high-resolution MRI, is associated with greater progression in both necrotic core and plaque volume [62]. The volume of wall, lumen, necrotic core, and IPH were measured at baseline and follow-up. Carotid arteries with IPH on baseline examination showed markedly accelerated rates of progression in wall volume (6.8% with IPH vs −0.15% without IPH, p = 0.009) and lipid-rich necrotic core volume (28.4% with IPH vs −5.2% without IPH, p = 0.001) over the course of 18 months (Fig. 6). Furthermore, those with IPH at baseline were much more likely to have new plaque hemorrhages at 18 months compared with control subjects (43% vs 0%, p = 0.006). A similar pattern was found in 67 asymptomatic subjects with 16–49% stenosis [63]. IPH was associated with accelerated progression in carotid wall volume compared with lesions without IPH (44.1 ± 36.1 vs 0.8 ± 34.5 mm3 per year, p < 0.001). Findings from these studies strongly suggest that IPH accelerates plaque progression within a relatively short period of 18 months.

Fig. 6. Carotid plaque with intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH).

Fig. 6

A and B, IPH is identified as bright signal intensity on baseline T1-weighted (T1W) MRI (A) and exhibits substantial increase in plaque size and luminal narrowing after 18 months (B). CCA = common carotid artery, Bif = bifurcation, ICA = internal carotid artery, ECA = external carotid artery. (Reprinted with permission from [62])

MRI of Atherosclerosis in Pharmaceutical Trials

An additional use of MRI of atherosclerosis with potential clinical ramifications is in clinical trials of lipid lowering and other atherosclerosis-related treatments. The most widely accepted explanation for the clinical event reduction with statin therapy is that lipid-lowering targets the plaque rupture risk features, such as large lipid-rich necrotic core, thin fibrous cap, and high level of inflammatory infiltrates and activity. Therefore, the plaque stability is improved and cardiovascular events are reduced. Atherosclerotic plaque lipid depletion has been shown in animal studies and human histologic observations [64].

In vivo verification of the lipid depletion hypothesis and establishment of the time course of plaque regression has only recently been enabled by MRI of atherosclerosis. In one early study, the carotid arteries of eight subjects with coronary artery disease undergoing long-term (10 years) lipid-lowering therapy were compared with those of eight matched control subjects who had never been treated with lipid-lowering therapy [65]. Although the treated subjects exhibited plaques that were only marginally smaller in area (58 vs 64 mm2, respectively; p = not significant), their lesions had significantly smaller lipid-rich necrotic core areas (0.7 vs 10.2 mm2, respectively; p = 0.01).

Of course, the major benefit of MRI for investigating therapeutic response of plaques is the ability to perform noninvasive serial studies to observe temporal changes in plaque. A study following aortic and carotid plaques in hypercholesterolemic patients under simvastatin therapy for 2 years with MRI at 6-month intervals reported vessel wall area was reduced by 11% after only 1 year (p < 0.01), with more moderate increases in lumen area reaching significance by 18 months [66, 67]. In a recent study of dalcetrapib (a cholesterol ester transfer protein inhibitor) in 130 subjects with or at high risk of coronary heart disease, total vessel area was reduced in patients treated with dalcetrapib at 600 mg/d compared with those taking a placebo after 24 months. The absolute change from baseline relative to placebo was −4.01 mm2 (p = 0.04) [68].

Other studies have targeted changes in plaque components, most notably the size of the lipid-rich necrotic core. The Carotid Plaque Composition (CPC) study using MRI during lipid therapy [69] was designed as a randomized, double-blind, partial placebo–controlled study [70] in which patients with known coronary or carotid disease were randomized to one of three intensive lipid regimens, all of which included atorvastatin. Annual serial MRI data from 33 pooled patients with a lipid-rich necrotic core on baseline MRI showed a 3-year reduction in average percentage lipid-rich necrotic core from 14.2% to 7.4% (p < 0.001), with a significant 1-year reduction over each of the first and second years but a small non-significant decrease in year 3. An example of plaque lipid depletion is shown in Figure 7. The CPC study also revealed a reduction in vessel wall volume that became significant at 2 years (Table 1). Notably, the CPC study revealed that the regression observed in plaque burden was primarily induced by lipid depletion because substantial and statistically significant carotid wall burden reduction only occurred in the slices containing a lipid-rich necrotic core (Table 1) and the time course of wall burden reduction seemed to follow plaque lipid depletion, with the largest changes occurring during the second year. In another study to investigate the effect of rosuvastatin on lipid-rich necrotic core size in 33 subjects, a 41.4% reduction was reported in the proportion of the vessel wall consisting of lipid-rich necrotic core after 2 years (p = 0.005) [71]. No significant change in plaque volume was observed.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

Response of carotid atherosclerotic lesion to 3 years of lipid therapy shows substantial reduction in plaque size (arrows). CE TW1 = contrast-enhanced T1-weighted image. (Reprinted with permission from [69])

TABLE 1.

Carotid Wall Measurement Change Over 3 Years and Differential Changes Between Slices With Without Lipid-Rich Necrotic Core [69]

Parameter Baseline vs 3 Years Annual Changesa Change Over 3 Years in Slices With and Without Lipid-Rich Necrotic Coreb

No. Baseline 3 Years pc No. First Year Second Year Third Year No. With Without pc

Wall volume (mm3) 33 641 ± 200 597 ± 198 < 0.001 30 −16 ± 62 −42 ± 57d,e 3 ± 34 31 −45 ± 55f −11 ± 32 0.004
Percent wall volume (%) 33 46.5 ± 7.1 44.3 ± 7.2 0.006 30 −0.6 ± 2.9 −2.1 ± 3.2 d,e −0.2 ± 2.5 31 −4.7 ± 7.1f −1.4 ± 3.2 0.02
Lumen volume (mm3) 33 750 ± 249 764 ± 258 0.11 30 2 ± 50 18 ± 52 5 ± 42 31 12 ± 41 7 ± 40 0.3

Note—Values are mean ± SD for the comparison of baseline vs 3 years and mean ± SE for each annual change during the 3 years.

a

Changes between the scans were annualized because of different times between the visits for different subjects. The calculation of changes was limited to patients with all four annual visits. Thus, the sample size is smaller than for the comparison of baseline vs 3 years.

b

The smaller sample size (n = 31) was the result of two patients not having both presence and absence of lipid-rich necrotic core slices.

c

Paired Student t test.

d

p < 0.001 when compared with null hypothesis of zero change.

e

p ≤ 0.01 when compared with year 1.

f

p < 0.001 when compared with zero change.

Pharmaceutical studies have also been undertaken using contrast agents to assess the response of inflammatory factors in atherosclerotic plaque. In the ATHEROMA (Atorvastatin Therapy: Effects on Reduction of Macrophage Activity) study, a significant (p = 0.0003) reduction in USPIO uptake was reported after only 6 weeks on 80 mg of atorvastatin [72]. No change was observed in a 10-mg group. In the CPC study described previously, DCE-MRI was used to investigate changes in the vasa vasorum under lipid therapy, and a drop in Ktrans was reported from 0.085 to 0.067 min−1 (p = 0.02) [73].

Future Perspectives and Conclusions

In this review of MRI of carotid atherosclerosis, a picture emerges of a technology that is on the cusp of providing clinically relevant information for management of carotid disease. The imaging techniques have been extensively validated. The technologies described can be translated into clinical use. Preliminary evidence indicates that unique features identified by MRI, such as IPH and fibrous cap rupture, are associated with higher risk of clinical and subclinical events. What is lacking, however, is proof that these factors provide marginal utility beyond existing risk variables. Furthermore, these techniques must yield cost-effective guidance to alter current clinical guidance and yield better long-term outcomes. For both of these challenges, large-scale clinical trials of this technology are warranted.

In addition to the clinical potential of MRI of atherosclerosis, it can be the choice of imaging modality to investigate therapeutic mechanisms. In this role, MRI of atherosclerosis is able to depict changes in the plaque in trials that are much smaller than would be required to observe changes in survival. Studies to date indicate that changes in lumen size are slow to develop, whereas changes in wall area appear to be detectable earlier. Changes in lipid-rich necrotic core appear to be observable still earlier and may provide a vascular biologic explanation for the onset and persistence of clinical benefit seen in the placebo-controlled lipid lowering trials [74]. The cardiovascular event reduction in these trials began at 1–2 years after initiation of lipid-lowering therapy, which corresponds with the timing of significant plaque lipid depletion. Markers of inflammation may be the soonest to respond to therapy. Knowledge of such time-dependent responses of different markers can be valuable for designing clinical trials on the basis of the expected mechanism of treatment.

Although the overwhelming majority of imaging development has been based on carotid MRI, similar techniques have been applied to the aorta, coronary arteries, intracranial arteries, and peripheral vasculature of the legs. Each of these targets introduces unique challenges, including small vessel size (intracranial and coronary arteries), deep location and motion (coronary arteries and aorta), highly distributed lesions (peripheral arteries), and tortuosity (intracranial arteries and aortic arch). To address these challenges, emerging 3D and rapid imaging protocols are especially promising.

Finally, the focus of this article has been techniques that are currently viable in the clinic and have shown evidence of utility. Numerous promising technologies are in the development stage. Most notably, molecular imaging holds particular promise with targeted probes under test for detecting neoangiogenesis and macrophages, among other targets [75]. As these and other technologies mature, they will add to the arsenal of MRI for imaging of atherosclerosis.

Acknowledgments

Supported by National Institutes of Health grants R01-HL056874, R01-HL073401, and R01-HL063895.

Footnotes

WEB

This is a Web exclusive article.

References

  • 1.Lloyd-Jones D, Adams RJ, Brown TM, et al. Executive summary: heart disease and stroke statistics—2010 update—a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2010;121:948–954. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.192666. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Peterson S, Peto V, Rayner M, Leal J, Luengo-Fernandez R, Gray A. European cardiovascular disease statistics. London, UK: British Heart Foundation Health Promotion Research Group and Health Economics Research Centre, Department of Public Health, University of Oxford; 2005. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Virmani R, Ladich ER, Burke AP, Kolodgie FD. Histopathology of carotid atherosclerotic disease. Neurosurgery. 2006;59(5 suppl 3):S219–S227. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000239895.00373.E4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Redgrave JN, Lovett JK, Gallagher PJ, Rothwell PM. Histological assessment of 526 symptomatic carotid plaques in relation to the nature and timing of ischemic symptoms: the Oxford plaque study. Circulation. 2006;113:2320–2328. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.589044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Golledge J, Greenhalgh RM, Davies AH. The symptomatic carotid plaque. Stroke. 2000;31:774–781. doi: 10.1161/01.str.31.3.774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Redgrave JN, Gallagher P, Lovett JK, Rothwell PM. Critical cap thickness and rupture in symptomatic carotid plaques: the Oxford plaque study. Stroke. 2008;39:1722–1729. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.507988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Carr S, Farb A, Pearce WH, Virmani R, Yao JS. Atherosclerotic plaque rupture in symptomatic carotid artery stenosis. J Vasc Surg. 1996;23:755–765. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(96)70237-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bassiouny HS, Sakaguchi Y, Mikucki SA, et al. Juxtalumenal location of plaque necrosis and neoformation in symptomatic carotid stenosis. J Vasc Surg. 1997;26:585–594. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(97)70056-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Mofidi R, Crotty TB, McCarthy P, Sheehan SJ, Mehigan D, Keaveny TV. Association between plaque instability, angiogenesis and symptomatic carotid occlusive disease. Br J Surg. 2001;88:945–950. doi: 10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.01823.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.McCarthy MJ, Loftus IM, Thompson MM, et al. Angiogenesis and the atherosclerotic carotid plaque: an association between symptomatology and plaque morphology. J Vasc Surg. 1999;30:261–268. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(99)70136-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Yuan C, Mitsumori LM, Ferguson MS, et al. In vivo accuracy of multispectral magnetic resonance imaging for identifying lipid-rich necrotic cores and intraplaque hemorrhage in advanced human carotid plaques. Circulation. 2001;104:2051–2056. doi: 10.1161/hc4201.097839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Mitsumori LM, Hatsukami TS, Ferguson MS, Kerwin WS, Cai J, Yuan C. In vivo accuracy of multisequence MR imaging for identifying unstable fibrous caps in advanced human carotid plaques. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2003;17:410–420. doi: 10.1002/jmri.10264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Cappendijk VC, Cleutjens KB, Kessels AG, et al. Assessment of human atherosclerotic carotid plaque components with multisequence MR imaging: initial experience. Radiology. 2005;234:487–492. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2342032101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Cai J, Hatsukami TS, Ferguson MS, et al. In vivo quantitative measurement of intact fibrous cap and lipid rich necrotic core size in atherosclerotic carotid plaque: a comparison of high resolution contrast enhanced MRI and histology. Circulation. 2005;112:3437–3444. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.528174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Saam T, Ferguson MS, Yarnykh VL, et al. Quantitative evaluation of carotid plaque composition by in vivo MRI. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2005;25:234–239. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000149867.61851.31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Tartari S, Rizzati R, Righi R, et al. High-resolution MRI of carotid plaque with a neurovascular coil and contrast-enhanced MR angiography: one-stop shopping for the comprehensive assessment of carotid atherosclerosis. AJR. 2011;196:1164–1171. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.4751. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kolodgie FD, Gold HK, Burke AP, et al. Intra-plaque hemorrhage and progression of coronary atheroma. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:2316–2325. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa035655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Virmani R, Kolodgie FD, Burke AP, Farb A, Schwartz SM. Lessons from sudden coronary death: a comprehensive morphological classification scheme for atherosclerotic lesions. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2000;20:1262–1275. doi: 10.1161/01.atv.20.5.1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Cai JM, Hatsukami TS, Ferguson MS, Small R, Polissar NL, Yuan C. Classification of human carotid atherosclerotic lesions with in vivo multi-contrast magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation. 2002;106:1368–1373. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000028591.44554.f9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Stary HC, Chandler AB, Dinsmore RE, et al. A definition of advanced types of atherosclerotic lesions and a histological classification of atherosclerosis: a report from the Committee on Vascular Lesions of the Council on Arteriosclerosis, American Heart Association. Circulation. 1995;92:1355–1374. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.92.5.1355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Demarco JK, Ota H, Underhill HR, et al. MR carotid plaque imaging and contrast-enhanced MR angiography identifies lesions associated with recent ipsilateral thromboembolic symptoms: an in vivo study at 3T. AJNR. 2010;31:1395–1402. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Qiao Y, Etesami M, Malhotra S, et al. Identification of intraplaque hemorrhage on MR angiography images: a comparison of contrast-enhanced mask and time-of-flight techniques. AJNR. 2011;32:454–459. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Chu B, Ferguson MS, Chen H, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging features of the disruption-prone and the disrupted carotid plaque. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009;2:883–896. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2009.03.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Luo Y, Polissar N, Han C, et al. Accuracy and uniqueness of three in vivo measurements of atherosclerotic carotid plaque morphology with black blood MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2003;50:75–82. doi: 10.1002/mrm.10503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Underhill HR, Yarnykh VL, Hatsukami TS, et al. Carotid plaque morphology and composition: initial comparison between 1.5- and 3.0-T magnetic field strengths. Radiology. 2008;248:550–560. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2482071114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Yuan C, Kerwin WS, Ferguson MS, et al. Contrast-enhanced high resolution MRI for atherosclerotic carotid artery tissue characterization. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2002;15:62–67. doi: 10.1002/jmri.10030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Wasserman BA, Smith WI, Trout HH, 3rd, Cannon RO, 3rd, Balaban RS, Arai AE. Carotid artery atherosclerosis: in vivo morphologic characterization with gadolinium-enhanced double-oblique MR imaging: initial results. Radiology. 2002;223:566–573. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2232010659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Takaya N, Cai J, Ferguson MS, et al. Intra- and interreader reproducibility of magnetic resonance imaging for quantifying the lipid-rich necrotic core is improved with gadolinium contrast enhancement. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2006;24:203–210. doi: 10.1002/jmri.20599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Balu N, Yarnykh VL, Chu B, Wang J, Hatsukami T, Yuan C. Carotid plaque assessment using fast 3D isotropic resolution black-blood MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2011;65:627–637. doi: 10.1002/mrm.22642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Koktzoglou I, Li D. Diffusion-prepared segmented steady-state free precession: application to 3D black-blood cardiovascular magnetic resonance of the thoracic aorta and carotid artery walls. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2007;9:33–42. doi: 10.1080/10976640600843413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Mihai G, Chung YC, Kariisa M, Raman SV, Simonetti OP, Rajagopalan S. Initial feasibility of a multistation high resolution three-dimensional dark blood angiography protocol for the assessment of peripheral arterial disease. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009;30:785–793. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21923. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Chu B, Kampschulte A, Ferguson MS, et al. Hemorrhage in the atherosclerotic carotid plaque: a high-resolution MRI study. Stroke. 2004;35:1079–1084. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000125856.25309.86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Moody AR, Murphy RE, Morgan PS, et al. Characterization of complicated carotid plaque with magnetic resonance direct thrombus imaging in patients with cerebral ischemia. Circulation. 2003;107:3047–3052. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000074222.61572.44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Ota H, Yarnykh VL, Ferguson MS, et al. Carotid intraplaque hemorrhage imaging at 3.0-T MR imaging: comparison of the diagnostic performance of three T1-weighted sequences. Radiology. 2010;254:551–563. doi: 10.1148/radiol.09090535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Wang J, Ferguson MS, Balu N, Yuan C, Hatsukami TS, Börnert P. Improved carotid intraplaque hemorrhage imaging using a slab-selective phase-sensitive inversion-recovery (SPI) sequence. Magn Reson Med. 2010;64:1332–1340. doi: 10.1002/mrm.22539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Wang J, Börnert P, Zhao H, et al. Simultaneous noncontrast angiography and intraplaque hemorrhage (SNAP) imaging for carotid atherosclerotic disease evaluation. Magn Reson Med. 2012 Mar 22; doi: 10.1002/mrm.24254. Epub ahead of print. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kooi ME, Cappendijk VC, Cleutjens KB, et al. Accumulation of ultrasmall superparamagnetic particles of iron oxide in human atherosclerotic plaques can be detected by in vivo magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation. 2003;107:2453–2458. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000068315.98705.CC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Trivedi RA, U-King-Im JM, Graves MJ, et al. In vivo detection of macrophages in human carotid atheroma: temporal dependence of ultrasmall superparamagnetic particles of iron oxide-enhanced MRI. Stroke. 2004;35:1631–1635. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000131268.50418.b7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kerwin W, Hooker A, Spilker M, et al. Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging analysis of neovasculature volume in carotid atherosclerotic plaque. Circulation. 2003;107:851–856. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000048145.52309.31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Kerwin WS, O’Brien KD, Ferguson MS, Polissar N, Hatsukami TS, Yuan C. Inflammation in carotid atherosclerotic plaque: a dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging study. Radiology. 2006;241:459–468. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2412051336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Kim SE, Treiman GS, Roberts JA. In vivo and ex vivo measurements of the mean ADC values of lipid necrotic core and hemorrhage obtained from diffusion weighted imaging in human atherosclerotic plaques. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011;34:1167–1175. doi: 10.1002/jmri.22736. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Yang Q, Liu J, Barnes SR, et al. Imaging the vessel wall in major peripheral arteries using susceptibility-weighted imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009;30:357–365. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Qiao Y, Hallock KJ, Hamilton JA. Magnetization transfer magnetic resonance of human atherosclerotic plaques ex vivo detects areas of high protein density. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2011;13:73. doi: 10.1186/1532-429X-13-73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Saam T, Underhill HR, Chu B, et al. Prevalence of American Heart Association type VI carotid atherosclerotic lesions identified by magnetic resonance imaging for different levels of stenosis as measured by duplex ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;51:1014–1021. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.10.054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Dong L, Hatsukami T, Ota H, et al. Magnetic resonance angiography measurement of carotid stenosis underestimates plaque burden identified by magnetic resonance imaging. (abstract) Circulation. 2008;118:S757–S758. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Dong L, Underhill HR, Yu W, et al. Geometric and compositional appearance of atheroma in an angiographically normal carotid artery in patients with atherosclerosis. AJNR. 2010;31:311–316. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1793. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Babiarz LS, Astor B, Mohamed MA, Wasserman BA. Comparison of gadolinium-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance angiography with high-resolution black blood cardiovascular magnetic resonance for assessing carotid artery stenosis. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2007;9:63–70. doi: 10.1080/10976640600843462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Wasserman BA, Wityk RJ, Trout HH, 3rd, Virmani R. Low-grade carotid stenosis: looking beyond the lumen with MRI. Stroke. 2005;36:2504–2513. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000185726.83152.00. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Yuan C, Zhang SX, Polissar NL, et al. Identification of fibrous cap rupture with magnetic resonance imaging is highly associated with recent transient ischemic attack or stroke. Circulation. 2002;105:181–185. doi: 10.1161/hc0202.102121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Sadat U, Weerakkody RA, Bowden DJ, et al. Utility of high resolution MR imaging to assess carotid plaque morphology: a comparison of acute symptomatic, recently symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with carotid artery disease. Atherosclerosis. 2009;207:434–439. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2009.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Saam T, Cai J, Ma L, et al. Comparison of symptomatic and asymptomatic atherosclerotic carotid plaque features with in vivo MR imaging. Radiology. 2006;240:464–472. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2402050390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Murphy RE, Moody AR, Morgan PS, et al. Prevalence of complicated carotid atheroma as detected by magnetic resonance direct thrombus imaging in patients with suspected carotid artery stenosis and previous acute cerebral ischemia. Circulation. 2003;107:3053–3058. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000074204.92443.37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Freilinger TM, Schindler A, Schmidt C, et al. Prevalence of nonstenosing, complicated atherosclerotic plaques in cryptogenic stroke. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;5:397–405. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.01.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Parmar JP, Rogers WJ, Mugler JP, 3rd, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of carotid atherosclerotic plaque in clinically suspected acute transient ischemic attack and acute ischemic stroke. Circulation. 2010;122:2031–2038. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.866053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Takaya N, Yuan C, Chu B, et al. Association between carotid plaque characteristics and subsequent ischemic cerebrovascular events: a prospective assessment with MRI—initial results. Stroke. 2006;37:818–823. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000204638.91099.91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Singh N, Moody AR, Gladstone DJ, et al. Moderate carotid artery stenosis: MRI depicted intra-plaque hemorrhage predicts risk of cerebrovascular ischemic events in asymptomatic men. Radiology. 2009;252:502–508. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2522080792. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Altaf N, MacSweeney ST, Gladman J, Auer DP. Carotid intraplaque hemorrhage predicts recurrent symptoms in patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. Stroke. 2007;38:1633–1635. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.106.473066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Altaf N, Daniels L, Morgan PS, et al. Detection of intraplaque hemorrhage by magnetic resonance imaging in symptomatic patients with mild to moderate carotid stenosis predicts recurrent neurological events. J Vasc Surg. 2008;47:337–342. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.09.064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Yamada K, Yoshimura S, Kawasaki M, et al. Embolic complications after carotid artery stenting or carotid endarterectomy are associated with tissue characteristics of carotid plaques evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging. Atherosclerosis. 2011;215:399–404. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2011.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Yoshimura S, Yamada K, Kawasaki M, et al. High-intensity signal on time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography indicates carotid plaques at high risk for cerebral embolism during stenting. Stroke. 2011;42:3132–3137. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.615708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Underhill HR, Yuan C, Yarnykh VL, et al. Predictors of surface disruption with MR imaging in asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. AJNR. 2010;31:487–493. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1842. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Takaya N, Yuan C, Chu B, et al. Presence of intra-plaque hemorrhage stimulates progression of carotid atherosclerotic plaques: a high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging study. Circulation. 2005;111:2768–2775. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.504167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Underhill HR, Yuan C, Yarnykh VL, et al. Arterial remodeling in the subclinical carotid artery: a natural history study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009;2:1381–1389. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2009.08.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Crisby M, Nordin-Fredriksson G, Shah PK, Yano J, Zhu J, Nilsson J. Pravastatin treatment increases collagen content and decreases lipid content, inflammation, metalloproteinases, and cell death in human carotid plaques: implications for plaque stabilization. Circulation. 2001;103:926–933. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.103.7.926. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Zhao XQ, Chun Y, Hatsukami TS, et al. Effects of intensive lipid-lowering therapy on carotid atherosclerotic plaque composition in vivo by MRI: a case-control study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2001;21:1623–1629. doi: 10.1161/hq1001.098463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Corti R, Fayad ZA, Fuster V, et al. Effects of lipid-lowering by simvastatin on human atherosclerotic lesions: a longitudinal study by high-resolution, noninvasive magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation. 2001;104:249–252. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.104.3.249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Corti R, Fuster V, Fayad ZA, et al. Lipid lowering by simvastatin induces regression of human atherosclerotic lesions: two years’ follow-up by high-resolution noninvasive magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation. 2002;106:2884–2887. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000041255.88750.f0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Fayad ZA, Mani V, Woodward M, et al. for the dal-PLAQUE Investigators. Safety and efficacy of dalcetrapib on atherosclerotic disease using novel non-invasive multimodality imaging (dal-PLAQUE): a randomised clinical trial. Lancet. 2011;378:1547–1559. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61383-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Zhao XQ, Dong L, Hatsukami T, et al. MR imaging of carotid plaque composition during lipid-lowering therapy a prospective assessment of effect and time course. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011;4:977–986. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2011.06.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Zhao XQ, Phan B, Chu B, et al. Testing the hypothesis of atherosclerotic plaque lipid depletion during lipid therapy by magnetic resonance imaging: study design of Carotid Plaque Composition study. Am Heart J. 2007;154:239–246. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.04.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Underhill HR, Yuan C, Zhao XQ, et al. Effect of rosuvastatin therapy on carotid plaque morphology and composition in moderately hypercholesterolemic patients: a high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging trial. Am Heart J. 2008;155:584.e1–584.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.11.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Tang TY, Howarth SP, Miller SR, et al. The ATHEROMA (Atorvastatin Therapy: Effects on Reduction of Macrophages Activity) study: evaluation using ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in carotid disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:2039–2050. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.03.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Dong L, Kerwin WS, Chen H, et al. Carotid artery atherosclerosis: effect of intensive lipid therapy on the vasa vasorum: evaluation by using dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology. 2011;260:224–231. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11101264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Brown BG, Zhao XQ. Lipid-lowering therapy. In: Hennekens CH, editor. Clinical trials in cardiovascular disease (a companion to Braunwald’s heart disease) W. B. Saunders Company; 1999. pp. 199–216. [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Cyrus T, Lanza GM, Wickline SA. Molecular imaging by cardiovascular MR. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2007;9:827–843. doi: 10.1080/10976640701693766. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES