Skip to main content
The EMBO Journal logoLink to The EMBO Journal
. 1990 Aug;9(8):2603–2609. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb07442.x

Restriction enzymes have limited access to DNA sequences in Drosophila chromosomes.

R S Jack 1, H Eggert 1
PMCID: PMC552293  PMID: 2164473

Abstract

Sequence specific DNA binding proteins in eukaryotic cells must efficiently locate their binding sites in chromosomes. Restriction enzymes provide a simple model system with which to investigate the factors which influence this process. We have used P element mediated transformation to introduce a DNA fragment containing a set of characterized restriction sites into the Drosophila germline. Embryonic nuclei prepared from these transgenic animals were treated with restriction enzymes to probe the accessibility of the target restriction sites. The results show that the insert is within an accessible region of the chromosome and that restriction sites within the inserted sequence can be cut. However, the rate of cutting is biphasic. At each restriction site, a fraction of the chromosomes is cut rapidly after which the remainder is refractory. Similar levels of incomplete cutting are obtained when the same P element construct is examined at a different chromosomal location, when different sequence elements are introduced into the P element vector or when the experiment is carried out on nuclei from different embryonic stages. These results are discussed in terms of how sequence specific DNA binding proteins may locate their genomic targets in vivo.

Full text

PDF
2603

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Andrews M. T., Brown D. D. Transient activation of oocyte 5S RNA genes in Xenopus embryos by raising the level of the trans-acting factor TFIIIA. Cell. 1987 Nov 6;51(3):445–453. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90640-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chao M. V., Gralla J. D., Martinson H. G. lac Operator nucleosomes. 1. Repressor binds specifically to operator within the nucleosome core. Biochemistry. 1980 Jul 8;19(14):3254–3260. doi: 10.1021/bi00555a024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Costlow N. A., Simon J. A., Lis J. T. A hypersensitive site in hsp70 chromatin requires adjacent not internal DNA sequence. Nature. 1985 Jan 10;313(5998):147–149. doi: 10.1038/313147a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dudler R., Travers A. A. Upstream elements necessary for optimal function of the hsp 70 promoter in transformed flies. Cell. 1984 Sep;38(2):391–398. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90494-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Karess R. E., Rubin G. M. Analysis of P transposable element functions in Drosophila. Cell. 1984 Aug;38(1):135–146. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90534-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Keith T. P., Riley M. A., Kreitman M., Lewontin R. C., Curtis D., Chambers G. Sequence of the structural gene for xanthine dehydrogenase (rosy locus) in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1987 May;116(1):67–73. doi: 10.1093/genetics/116.1.67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ladiges W. C., Raff R. F., Brown S., Deeg H. J., Storb R. The canine major histocompatibility complex. Supertypic specificities defined by the primed lymphocyte test (PLT). Immunogenetics. 1984;19(4):359–365. doi: 10.1007/BF00345410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Mirkovitch J., Spierer P., Laemmli U. K. Genes and loops in 320,000 base-pairs of the Drosophila melanogaster chromosome. J Mol Biol. 1986 Jul 20;190(2):255–258. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(86)90296-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Noll M., Thomas J. O., Kornberg R. D. Preparation of native chromatin and damage caused by shearing. Science. 1975 Mar 28;187(4182):1203–1206. doi: 10.1126/science.187.4182.1203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. O'Hare K., Murphy C., Levis R., Rubin G. M. DNA sequence of the white locus of Drosophila melanogaster. J Mol Biol. 1984 Dec 15;180(3):437–455. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(84)90021-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Pelham H. R. A regulatory upstream promoter element in the Drosophila hsp 70 heat-shock gene. Cell. 1982 Sep;30(2):517–528. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90249-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Piña B., Brüggemeier U., Beato M. Nucleosome positioning modulates accessibility of regulatory proteins to the mouse mammary tumor virus promoter. Cell. 1990 Mar 9;60(5):719–731. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90087-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Prunell A. Nucleosome reconstitution on plasmid-inserted poly(dA) . poly(dT). EMBO J. 1982;1(2):173–179. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1982.tb01143.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Qian Y. Q., Billeter M., Otting G., Müller M., Gehring W. J., Wüthrich K. The structure of the Antennapedia homeodomain determined by NMR spectroscopy in solution: comparison with prokaryotic repressors. Cell. 1989 Nov 3;59(3):573–580. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90040-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ramsay N. Deletion analysis of a DNA sequence that positions itself precisely on the nucleosome core. J Mol Biol. 1986 May 5;189(1):179–188. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(86)90389-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Richmond T. J., Finch J. T., Rushton B., Rhodes D., Klug A. Structure of the nucleosome core particle at 7 A resolution. Nature. 1984 Oct 11;311(5986):532–537. doi: 10.1038/311532a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Rigaud G., Grange T., Pictet R. The use of NaOH as transfer solution of DNA onto nylon membrane decreases the hybridization efficiency. Nucleic Acids Res. 1987 Jan 26;15(2):857–857. doi: 10.1093/nar/15.2.857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Rubin G. M., Spradling A. C. Genetic transformation of Drosophila with transposable element vectors. Science. 1982 Oct 22;218(4570):348–353. doi: 10.1126/science.6289436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Rykowski M. C., Parmelee S. J., Agard D. A., Sedat J. W. Precise determination of the molecular limits of a polytene chromosome band: regulatory sequences for the Notch gene are in the interband. Cell. 1988 Aug 12;54(4):461–472. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90067-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Satchwell S. C., Drew H. R., Travers A. A. Sequence periodicities in chicken nucleosome core DNA. J Mol Biol. 1986 Oct 20;191(4):659–675. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(86)90452-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Shrader T. E., Crothers D. M. Artificial nucleosome positioning sequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Oct;86(19):7418–7422. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.19.7418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Simon J. A., Sutton C. A., Lobell R. B., Glaser R. L., Lis J. T. Determinants of heat shock-induced chromosome puffing. Cell. 1985 Apr;40(4):805–817. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90340-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Simpson R. T. Nucleosome positioning can affect the function of a cis-acting DNA element in vivo. Nature. 1990 Jan 25;343(6256):387–389. doi: 10.1038/343387a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Steller H., Pirrotta V. A transposable P vector that confers selectable G418 resistance to Drosophila larvae. EMBO J. 1985 Jan;4(1):167–171. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1985.tb02332.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Widom J. Physicochemical studies of the folding of the 100 A nucleosome filament into the 300 A filament. Cation dependence. J Mol Biol. 1986 Aug 5;190(3):411–424. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(86)90012-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Wolffe A. P., Brown D. D. Differential 5S RNA gene expression in vitro. Cell. 1987 Dec 4;51(5):733–740. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90096-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Wu C. The 5' ends of Drosophila heat shock genes in chromatin are hypersensitive to DNase I. Nature. 1980 Aug 28;286(5776):854–860. doi: 10.1038/286854a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The EMBO Journal are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES