Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Cardiol. 2017 May 11;120(3):473–478. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.05.004

Relation of Serum Vitamin D to Risk of Mitral Annular and Aortic Valve Calcium (From the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis [MESA])

Martin Tibuakuu a,b, Di Zhao b, Ian H de Boer c, Eliseo Guallar b, Anna E Bortnick d, Pamela L Lutsey e, Matthew J Budoff f, Jorge R Kizer d,g, Bryan R Kestenbaum c, Erin D Michos a,b
PMCID: PMC5523859  NIHMSID: NIHMS876391  PMID: 28583687

Abstract

Serum 25(OH)D concentration has been identified as a possible modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD). We hypothesized that serum 25(OH)D concentration would be associated with calcifications of the left-sided heart valves, which are markers of CVD risk. Aortic Valve Calcium (AVC) and Mitral Annular Calcium (MAC) were quantified from cardiac CT scans performed on 5,530 MESA participants at the baseline exam (2000–2002) and at a follow-up visit at either Exam 2 (2002–2004) or Exam 3 (2004–2005). 25(OH)D was measured from serum samples collected at the baseline exam. Using relative risk regression, we evaluated the multivariable-adjusted risk of prevalent and incident AVC and MAC in this ethnically diverse population free of clinical CVD at baseline. The mean age of participants was 62±10 years; 53% were women, 40% white, 26% black, 21% Hispanic and 12% Chinese. Prevalent AVC and MAC were observed in 12% and 9%, respectively. There were no significant associations between 25(OH)D and prevalent AVC or MAC. Over a mean follow-up of 2.5 years, 4% developed incident AVC and 5% developed incident MAC. After adjusting for demographic variables, each 10 ng/ml higher serum 25(OH)D was associated with a 15% [RR=0.85 (95% CI 0.74, 0.98)] lower risk of incident MAC but not AVC. However, this association was no longer significant after adjusting for lifestyle and CVD risk factors. Results suggest a possible link between serum 25(OH)D and the risk for incident MAC, but future studies with longer follow-up are needed to further test this association.

Keywords: Vitamin D, Valvular Calcium, AVC, MAC, Epidemiology, Prevention

INTRODUCTION

Mineral metabolism has been recognized as a major risk factor for vascular calcification through trans-differentiation of smooth muscle cells to an osteogenic phenotype.1 Specifically, higher serum concentrations of phosphate have been shown to be associated with aortic valve calcium (AVC) and mitral annular calcium (MAC) in the setting of kidney disease2,3 and in a general population of older adults without known kidney disease or hyperparathyroidism.4,5 Activated vitamin D plays a central role in mineral metabolism. Additionally, activated vitamin D modulates inflammation, which is a key component of coronary artery and valvular calcification as well as atherosclerosis.6 An independent association of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] with coronary artery calcium (CAC) has been reported,7 but whether there is a relation of 25(OH)D to valvular calcium is unknown. This study examines whether serum concentrations of 25(OH)D are associated with the prevalence and incidence of AVC and MAC using data from a large multi-ethnic community-based cohort. We hypothesized that both deficient and excess 25(OH)D concentrations would be associated with increased valvular calcium.

METHODS

Detailed description of the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) has been published elsewhere.8 In brief, 6,814 Caucasian, African-American, Hispanic and Chinese participants aged 45–84 years and free of clinical cardiovascular disease (CVD) at time of enrollment were recruited from six U.S cities (Baltimore, Maryland; Chicago, Illinois; Forsyth County, North Carolina; Los Angeles, California; New York, New York and St. Paul, Minnesota). MESA was designed to investigate the significance of subclinical CVD. The first examination (baseline) took place between 2000 and 2002. Follow-up visits took place between 2002–2004 for Exam 2 and 2004–2005 for Exam 3. By study design, all participants underwent a cardiac computed tomography (CT) scan at baseline; a random half had a follow-up cardiac CT at Exam 2 and the other half at Exam 3 (thus varying the time between the baseline and follow-up CTs).

Of the 6,814 participants enrolled in MESA, after accounting for the exclusions noted in Figure 1, a total of 5,530 participants were included in our analytic sample. Institutional Review Boards of all participating sites approved the study, and all participants signed informed consent for the MESA Study.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

A flow diagram illustrating the prevalence of AVC and MAC at baseline and the percentage of participants at risk who developed incident AVC/MAC on follow-up CT.

From serum samples that were collected at the baseline MESA exam and stored at −70°C, 25(OH)D concentrations were measured using high-performance HPLC–tandem mass spectrometry at the University of Washington,9 and calibrated to National Institute of Standards and Technology standards.10 The interassay coefficient of variation was 4% at 10.4 ng/mL with a lower limit of detection of 2.0 ng/mL for 25(OH)D3 and a coefficient of variation of 4% at 9.4 ng/mL with a lower limit of detection of 0.5 ng/mL for 25(OH)D2.11 25(OH)D3 and 25(OH)D2 were combined for total 25(OH)D concentrations. Seasonal variation in serum levels of 25(OH)D was accounted for by using a cosinor model to derive annualized 25(OH)D concentrations as previously described.11,12 To convert 25(OH)D levels to nmol/L from ng/ml, multiply by 2.496.

At the baseline exam and at either Exam 2 or 3 (randomly assigned), participants underwent ECG-gated cardiac CT scanning by electron-beam CT at 3 centers and a four-slice multi-detector row helical CT at the other 3 centers. Participants underwent two consecutive scans at the same visit and results were averaged to enhance the accuracy of calcium assessments. From these cardiac CTs, AVC and MAC were quantified by the Agatston scoring method.13 All studies were interpreted at one central reading center (Harbor-UCLA Research and Education Institute, Los Angeles, CA). Any detectable calcium was defined as a score >0 Agatston units. Details of the image acquisition and interpretation protocols, quality control measures and interobserver reliability characteristics have been reported.14

Demographics, behavioral risk factors, medical history and medication history were obtained using standardized questionnaires at Exam 1. The following covariates were included in our analyses: age, sex, race/ethnicity (White, Chinese, Black, or Hispanic), education (<high school; high school or vocational school; college, graduate or professional school), cigarette smoking status (current; former; never) and physical activity level (MET-min/week of moderate or vigorous activity). We also included baseline CVD risk factors: systolic blood pressure, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (CRP), diabetes (defined as fasting blood glucose ≥126 mg/dl, or nonfasting glucose ≥200 mg/dl or medication use), body mass index (BMI, as a continuous variable), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) derived from the CKD-EPI equation,15 total cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, and medication usage (lipid-lowering therapy and antihypertensive).

Prevalent AVC or MAC was defined as Agatston score >0 at baseline and incident AVC or MAC was defined as detectable AVC or MAC at a follow-up examination in a participant free of AVC or MAC at baseline.

We stratified baseline characteristics by serum 25(OH)D categories using the Institute of Medicine guidelines to define deficient 25(OH)D as levels <20 ng/ml and adequate as levels ≥20 ng/ml.16 Frequencies and proportions were reported for categorical variables, and means with standard deviations or medians with interquartile ranges for continuous variables. Variables that were highly skewed (CRP and physical activity) were natural log transformed to approximate a normal distribution. After confirming a linear assumption was not violated, relative risk regression models with robust variance estimation were used to estimate the adjusted prevalence risk ratio (adjPRR) and relative risk (adjRR) of incident AVC or MAC [with 95% confidence intervals (CI)] for each 10 ng/ml higher in serum 25(OH)D. All analyses were progressively adjusted as follows: Model 1 adjusted for demographics (age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, site and CT scan type) and time between CT for incidence analysis, Model 2 additionally adjusted for behavioral risk factors (physical activity, BMI and smoking), and Model 3 additionally adjusted for potential mediators of the association between 25(OH)D and calcification (diabetes, systolic blood pressure, eGFR, total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, CRP, use of lipid lowering medication and use of antihypertensive medications). To determine if there was a U-shaped distribution of risk as hypothesized17, we modeled the association between 25(OH)D with AVC and MAC using a restricted cubic spline model, adjusted for demographic variables (Model 1). In sensitivity analyses, we also evaluated the multivariable-adjusted risk of prevalent and incident AVC or MAC by quintiles of 25(OH)D with median quintile as reference. Multiplicative interaction terms were created to evaluate for effect modification by variables that may affect vitamin D metabolism. These included: race/ethnicity, age, sex, and eGFR.

All statistical analyses were performed using STATA 13 (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX) and significance was considered at P value of 0.05 or less.

RESULTS

Of the 5,530 participants included in our analysis, the mean age was 62 ±10 years and 47% were men. Deficient serum 25(OH)D (<20ng/ml) was associated with younger age, black race, presence of diabetes, current smoking status, higher BMI, higher CRP level and lower HDL cholesterol (Table 1). At baseline, 12% of participants had prevalent AVC, leaving 88% at risk for incident AVC (Figure 1). Also, 9% had prevalent MAC, leaving 91% at risk for incident MAC (Figure 1).

Table 1.

Characteristics of 5,530 MESA Participants at Baseline (2000–2002), for All and by 25(OH)D Status*,**

Characteristic All Deficient
(<20 ng/ml)
Adequate
(≥20 ng/ml)

(n= 5530) (n= 1756) (n= 3774)

Age (years; mean ± SD) 62 ± 10 60 ± 10 62 ± 10
Men 2542 (47%) 776 (45%) 1823 (48%)
Race/ethnicity
  White 2161 (40%) 354 (20%) 1874 (50%)
  Chinese-American 669 (12%) 140 (8%) 529 (14%)
  Black 1411 (26%) 858 (49%) 580 (15%)
  Hispanic 1151 (21%) 385 (22%) 794 (21%)
Site
  Wake Forest University 850 (16%) 286 (17%) 565 (15%)
  Columbia University 868 (16%) 348 (20%) 521 (14%)
  Johns Hopkins University 787 (15%) 317 (18%) 518 (14%)
  University of Minnesota 839 (16%) 257 (15%) 654 (17%)
  Northwestern University 987 (18%) 319 (18%) 667 (18%)
  University of California 1061 (20%) 210 (12%) 852 (23%)
Education
  Less than high school 892 (17%) 308 (18%) 606 (16%)
  High school or vocational school 2211 (41%) 764 (44%) 1509 (40%)
  College, graduate or professional school 2289 (43%) 665 (38%) 1662 (44%)
Diabetes mellitus 637 (12%) 256 (15%) 646 (12%)
Smoker
  Never 2752 (51%) 858 (49%) 1940 (51%)
  Former 1980 (37%) 589 (34%) 1442(38%)
  Current 660 (12%) 290 (17%) 395 (11%)
Medication use
  Antihypertensive 1720 (32%) 610 (35.1%) 1143 (38.2%)
  Lipid lowering medication 892 (17%) 256 (14.7%) 655 (17.3%)
Systolic blood pressure (mm Hg; mean ± SD) 126 ± 21 128 ± 21 125 ± 21
eGFR (ml/min per 1.73 m2; mean ± SD) 78.2± 16.0 82.2 ± 16.5 76.3 ± 15.3
BMI (kg/m2; mean ± SD) 28.2 ± 5.4 30.0 ± 5.9 27.4 ± 4.9
Physical activity (MET-minutes/week; median (IQI) 4140 (5460) 4230 (6135) 4095 (5167)
hsCRP (mg/L; median (IQI)) 1.84 (3.3) 2.3 (3.7) 1.7 (3.0)
Total cholesterol (mg/dl; mean ± SD) 194.0 ± 35.0 192.7 ± 36.6 194.8 ± 34.3
HDL cholesterol (mg/dl; mean ± SD) 51.1 ± 14.7 49.9 ± 14.2 51.7 ± 15.0
AVC Agatston score>0 681 (12%) 196 (11%) 485 (13%)
MAC Agatston score>0 500 (9%) 124 (7%) 376 (10%)
*

Abbreviations: Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA); 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D); Standard Deviation (SD); Interquartile Interval (IQI); Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR); Body Mass Index (BMI); Metabolic Equivalent of Task (MET); High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP); High Density Lipoprotein (HDL); Aortic Valve Calcification (AVC); Mitral Annular Calcification (MAC)

**

To convert 25(OH)D levels to nmol/L from ng/ml, multiply by 2.496; Institute of Medicine cut-points were used to define deficiency vs adequacy.

P<0.001;

P< 0.05;

P-values for continuous variables were calculated using t test with equal variances or Kolmogorov-Smirnov test where appropriate, and for categorical variables using chi-square test.

Compared to persons with 25(OH)D<20ng/ml, persons with 25(OH)D≥20ng/ml were more likely to have prevalent MAC at baseline (Table 1). However, there was no statistically significant association between 25(OH)D levels and prevalent MAC nor AVC in multivariable-adjusted analysis (Table 2).

Table 2.

Adjusted Associations of 25(OH)D Levels With Prevalent AVC and MAC*,**

Parameter adjPRR* (95% CI) P-value
Prevalent AVC
  [n = 681 (12%)]
Model 1 0.99 (0.99–1.00) 0.52
Model 2 1.00 (0.99–1.00) 0.95
Model 3 1.00 (0.99–1.00) 0.99
Prevalent MAC
  [n = 500 (9%)]
Model 1 1.00 (0.99–1.01) 0.98
Model 2 1.00 (1.00–1.01) 0.27
Model 3 1.01 (1.00–1.01) 0.26
*

adjPRR is per 10-ng/ml higher in 25(OH)D concentration. To convert 25(OH)D levels to nmol/L from ng/ml, multiply by 2.496

**

Abbreviations: 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D); Aortic Valve Calcification (AVC); Mitral Annular Calcification (MAC); adjusted Relative Risk (adjRR); Confidence Interval (CI); Computed Tomography (CT); High Density Lipoprotein (HDL)

Model 1: age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, study site and CT scan type.

Model 2: Model 1 plus additional potential confounding lifestyle variables (body mass index, smoking and physical activity).

Model 3: Model 2 plus potential vascular risk factor mediators (diabetes, systolic blood pressure, use of antihypertensive medications, estimated glomerular filtration rate, total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, use of lipid lowering medication, C-reactive protein)

Over a mean follow-up of 2.5 years, 4% of participants free of AVC at baseline developed incident AVC and 5% free of MAC developed incident MAC (Figure 1). After adjusting for demographic variables, each 10 ng/ml higher serum 25(OH)D was associated with a 15% lower risk of incident MAC but not AVC (Table 3, Model 1). However, this association was no longer significant after adjusting for lifestyle and CVD risk factors. In adjusted restricted cubic spline models, the associations of 25(OH)D levels with incident MAC (Figure 2) and incident AVC (Figure 3) were generally monotonic.

Table 3.

Adjusted Associations of 25(OH)D Levels with Incident AVC and MAC*,**

Parameter adjRR* (95% CI) P-value
Incident AVC
  [n = 194 (4%)]
Model 1 0.99 (0.97–1.01) 0.99
Model 2 0.99 (0.97–1.01) 0.61
Model 3 0.99 (0.97–1.01) 0.50
Incident MAC
  [n = 224 (5%)]
Model 1 0.85 (0.74–0.98) 0.023
Model 2 0.90 (0.79–1.04) 0.15
Model 3 0.92 (0.80–1.06) 0.26
*

adjRR is per 10-ng/ml higher in 25(OH)D concentration. To convert 25(OH)D levels to nmol/L from ng/ml, multiply by 2.496. Bolded results are statistically significant.

**

Abbreviations: 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D); Aortic Valve Calcification (AVC); Mitral Annular Calcification (MAC); adjusted Relative Risk (adjRR); Confidence Interval (CI); Computed Tomography (CT); High Density Lipoprotein (HDL)

Model 1: age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, study site, CT scan type and time between CT.

Model 2: Model 1 plus additional potential confounding lifestyle variables (body mass index, smoking and physical activity).

Model 3: Model 2 plus potential vascular risk factor mediators (diabetes, systolic blood pressure, use of antihypertensive medications, estimated glomerular filtration rate, total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, use of lipid lowering medication, C-reactive protein)

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Adjusted restricted cubic spline model of the association between serum 25(OH)D level and incident MAC. Solid line represents the point estimate and dashed lines represent the 95% confidence intervals. Adjusted per model 1 (see footnote to Table 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Adjusted restricted cubic spline model of the association between serum 25(OH)D level and incident AVC. Solid line represents the point estimate and dashed lines represent the 95% confidence intervals. Adjusted per model 1 (see footnote to Table 3).

In sensitivity analyses, results for prevalent and incident AVC and MAC were similar in models using 25(OH)D categories instead of continuous 25(OH)D levels (Supplemental Tables S1 and S2). We did not find any association of 25(OH)D concentrations with the severity of MAC and AVC scores at baseline or follow-up for those with score>0. Also, there were no significant interactions by age, sex, race/ethnicity, or eGFR for the associations tested.

DISCUSSION

We evaluated the association between serum 25(OH)D levels and cardiac valvular calcium (AVC and MAC) by means of quantitative serial CT scan measurements. Over a mean follow-up of 2.5 years, higher serum 25(OH)D was significantly associated with a lower risk of incident MAC but not AVC, however, this association was no longer significant after further adjustment for behavioral and traditional CVD risk factors. Contrary to some suggestions of a U-shaped distribution of risk reported with vitamin D and CVD in the literature,17 we found that the association between serum 25(OH)D and valvular calcium was generally monotonic.

To our knowledge, this is the first study to report a prospective association between serum 25(OH)D and valvular calcium in a large racially/ethnically diverse population free of preexisting clinical CVD. Dishmon et al reported an association between vitamin D deficiency and echocardiographic evidence of valvular calcium in a small sample of patients with dilated cardiomyopathy.18 Similar to our findings, prior work in MESA revealed an inverse association between serum 25(OH)D and the risk of incident CAC by cardiac CT.7 Interestingly, MAC and CAC have been shown to share the same traditional CVD risk factors,19,20 and given the strong association between MAC and CAC,21 the same biological mechanisms may underlie both diseases.

However, the association of higher serum 25(OH)D with lower risk of incident MAC was no longer significant after further adjustment for lifestyle and CVD risk factors. One possible explanation is that our analyses may be have been underpowered given the small proportion of incident MAC (4%) after an average follow-up period of only 2.5 years. Alternatively, the relationship between 25(OH)D and MAC may be confounded by lifestyle and CVD risk factors, as deficient 25(OH)D may be a marker of a poorer health state. Studies show that increasing BMI and low physical activity, which are well-established risk factors for CVD, are also associated with lower serum 25(OH)D levels.2224

It is unclear why serum 25(OH)D was not associated with incident AVC. One possible explanation may be because of the differences in anatomy and hydrodynamics between the aortic and mitral valves. The mitral valve annulus is a C-shaped segment of the fibrous skeleton at the base of the left ventricle and may present a larger surface area for progressive calcium deposition compared to the aortic valve (which has a smaller annulus). In addition, the aortic valve is a high-flow area compared to the mitral valve and may take longer for progressive calcium deposition to build up. Additionally, previous analysis in Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS) revealed that mineral metabolism markers were mainly associated with MAC, whereas measures of lipid metabolism were associated with AVC.25 This could therefore explain the lack of significant association between 25(OH)D and AVC.

The findings from this study are partly consistent with the large body of observational evidence that serum 25(OH)D deficiency is a risk marker for future CVD.7,26,27 However whether vitamin D supplementation, a widely available and low cost remedy, can reduce CVD risk remains uncertain at this time.27 The recent Vitamin D Assessment Study failed to show that high-dose vitamin D supplementation prevented CVD events.28 However, confirmatory results from other large randomized clinical trials [such as the ongoing Vitamin D and Omega-3 Trial (VITAL) study29] that include more diverse populations and include individuals with 25(OH)D deficiency are needed to definitively determine the benefit of vitamin D supplementation on CVD outcomes.

This analysis was conducted in a racially/ethnically diverse community-based population. Also, participants were free of clinical CVD at the time of enrollment, reducing the likelihood of confounding by poorer health status. AVC and MAC were assessed with serial CT scan measurements and potential confounders were also well characterized in MESA. Nonetheless, there are some limitations to this study that must be acknowledged. First, 25(OH)D was measured only once at baseline. Although serum 25(OH)D is reflective of the composite production of vitamin D from endogenous and exogenous sources, a single measurement of 25(OH)D does not represent cumulative vitamin D levels. However, we did account for seasonal variation. Second, follow-up time of almost 2.5 years was short, leading to a very low incidence of AVC and MAC in this population. Finally, the temporal association observed between 25(OH)D and MAC does not necessarily demonstrate causality.

Supplementary Material

supplement

Acknowledgments

FINANCIAL SUPPORT: Dr. Michos was supported by NIH/NINDS grants R01NS072243, and by the Blumenthal Scholars Fund for Preventive Cardiology Research. This research was supported by grants R01HL096875 and R01 HL071739 from the National Institute of Health, by contracts HHSN268201500003I, N01-HC-95159, N01-HC-95160, N01-HC-95161, N01-HC-95162, N01-HC-95163, N01-HC-95164, N01-HC-95165, N01-HC-95166, N01-HC-95167, N01-HC-95168 and N01-HC-95169 from the NHLBI, and by grants UL1-TR-000040, UL1-TR-001079, and UL1-TR-001420 from NCATS.

The authors thank the other investigators, the staff, and the participants of the MESA study for their valuable contributions. A full list of participating MESA investigators and institutions can be found at http://www.mesa-nhlbi.org.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Conflicts of interest:

Dr. Michos has the following disclosures:
  • Consultant: Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics (unrelated to topic)

Dr. Budoff has received research funds from GE Healthcare.

No other authors declare a conflict of interest.

References

  • 1.Rajamannan NM, Subramaniam M, Rickard D, Stock SR, Donovan J, Springett M, Orszulak T, Fullerton DA, Tajik AJ, Bonow RO, Spelsberg T. Human aortic valve calcification is associated with an osteoblast phenotype. Circulation. 2003;107:2181–2184. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000070591.21548.69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Adeney KL, Siscovick DS, Ix JH, Seliger SL, Shlipak MG, Jenny NS, Kestenbaum BR. Association of serum phosphate with vascular and valvular calcification in moderate CKD. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;20:381–387. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2008040349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ribeiro S, Ramos A, Brandao A, Rebelo JR, Guerra A, Resina C, Vila-Lobos A, Carvalho F, Remedio F, Ribeiro F. Cardiac valve calcification in haemodialysis patients: role of calcium-phosphate metabolism. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1998;13:2037–2040. doi: 10.1093/ndt/13.8.2037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Linefsky JP, O'Brien KD, Katz R, de Boer IH, Barasch E, Jenny NS, Siscovick DS, Kestenbaum B. Association of serum phosphate levels with aortic valve sclerosis and annular calcification: the cardiovascular health study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58:291–297. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.11.073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Linefsky JP, O'Brien KD, Sachs M, Katz R, Eng J, Michos ED, Budoff MJ, de Boer I, Kestenbaum B. Serum phosphate is associated with aortic valve calcification in the Multi-ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) Atherosclerosis. 2014;233:331–337. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2013.12.051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lemire JM. Immunomodulatory role of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3. J Cell Biochem. 1992;49:26–31. doi: 10.1002/jcb.240490106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.de Boer IH, Kestenbaum B, Shoben AB, Michos ED, Sarnak MJ, Siscovick DS. 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels inversely associate with risk for developing coronary artery calcification. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;20:1805–1812. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2008111157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bild DE, Bluemke DA, Burke GL, Detrano R, Diez Roux AV, Folsom AR, Greenland P, Jacobs DR, Jr, Kronmal R, Liu K, Nelson JC, O’Leary D, Saad MF, Shea S, Szklo M, Tracy RP. Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis: Objectives and Design. American Journal of Epidemiology. 2002;156:871–881. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwf113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sachs MC, Shoben A, Levin GP, Robinson-Cohen C, Hoofnagle AN, Swords-Jenny N, Ix JH, Budoff M, Lutsey PL, Siscovick DS, Kestenbaum B, de Boer IH. Estimating mean annual 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations from single measurements: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Am J Clin Nutr. 2013;97:1243–1251. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.112.054502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Phinney KW, Bedner M, Tai SS, Vamathevan VV, Sander LC, Sharpless KE, Wise SA, Yen JH, Schleicher RL, Chaudhary-Webb M, Pfeiffer CM, Betz JM, Coates PM, Picciano MF. Development and certification of a standard reference material for vitamin D metabolites in human serum. Anal Chem. 2012;84:956–962. doi: 10.1021/ac202047n. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Robinson-Cohen C, Hoofnagle AN, Ix JH, Sachs MC, Tracy RP, Siscovick DS, Kestenbaum BR, de Boer IH. Racial differences in the association of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration with coronary heart disease events. JAMA. 2013;310:179–188. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.7228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Shoben AB, Kestenbaum B, Levin G, Hoofnagle AN, Psaty BM, Siscovick DS, de Boer IH. Seasonal variation in 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations in the cardiovascular health study. Am J Epidemiol. 2011;174:1363–1372. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwr258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Agatston AS, Janowitz WR, Hildner FJ, Zusmer NR, Viamonte M, Jr, Detrano R. Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990;15:827–832. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(90)90282-t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Budoff MJ, Takasu J, Katz R, Mao S, Shavelle DM, O'Brien KD, Blumenthal RS, Carr JJ, Kronmal R. Reproducibility of CT measurements of aortic valve calcification, mitral annulus calcification, and aortic wall calcification in the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. Acad Radiol. 2006;13:166–172. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2005.09.090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Levey AS, Stevens LA. Estimating GFR using the CKD Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) creatinine equation: more accurate GFR estimates, lower CKD prevalence estimates, and better risk predictions. Am J Kidney Dis. 2010;55:622–627. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2010.02.337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ross AC, Manson JE, Abrams SA, Aloia JF, Brannon PM, Clinton SK, Durazo-Arvizu RA, Gallagher JC, Gallo RL, Jones G, Kovacs CS, Mayne ST, Rosen CJ, Shapses SA. The 2011 report on dietary reference intakes for calcium and vitamin D from the Institute of Medicine: what clinicians need to know. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96:53–58. doi: 10.1210/jc.2010-2704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Zittermann A, Schleithoff SS, Koerfer R. Vitamin D and vascular calcification. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2007;18:41–46. doi: 10.1097/MOL.0b013e328011c6fc. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Dishmon DA, Dotson JL, Munir A, Nelson MD, Bhattacharya SK, IA DC, Davis RC, Weber KT. Hypovitaminosis D and valvular calcification in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. Am J Med Sci. 2009;337:312–316. doi: 10.1097/MAJ.0b013e3181907add. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kanjanauthai S, Nasir K, Katz R, Rivera JJ, Takasu J, Blumenthal RS, Eng J, Budoff MJ. Relationships of mitral annular calcification to cardiovascular risk factors: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) Atherosclerosis. 2010;213:558–562. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2010.08.072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Elmariah S, Budoff MJ, Delaney JAC, Hamirani Y, Eng J, Fuster V, Kronmal RA, Halperin JL, O’Brien KD. Risk Factors Associated with the Incidence and Progression of Mitral Annulus Calcification: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Am Heart J. 2013;166:904–912. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2013.08.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hamirani YS, Nasir K, Blumenthal RS, Takasu J, Shavelle D, Kronmal R, Budoff M. Relation of mitral annular calcium and coronary calcium (from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis [MESA]) Am J Cardiol. 2011;107:1291–1294. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Samuel L, Borrell LN. The effect of body mass index on optimal vitamin D status in U.S. adults: the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2001–2006. Ann Epidemiol. 2013;23:409–414. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2013.05.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.McKibben RA, Zhao D, Lutsey PL, Schneider AL, Guallar E, Mosley TH, Michos ED. Factors associated with change in 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels over longitudinal followup in the ARIC study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015 doi: 10.1210/jc.2015-1711. jc20151711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Chin K, Zhao D, Tibuakuu M, Martin SS, Ndumele CE, Florido R, Windham BG, Guallar E, Lutsey PL, Michos ED. Physical activity, Vitamin D, and Incident Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease in Whites and Blacks: the ARIC Study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2017 doi: 10.1210/jc.2016-3743. [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Bortnick AE, Bartz TM, Ix JH, Chonchol M, Reiner A, Cushman M, Owens D, Barasch E, Siscovick DS, Gottdiener JS, Kizer JR. Association of inflammatory, lipid and mineral markers with cardiac calcification in older adults. Heart. 2016 doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2016-309404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Wang L, Song Y, Manson JE, Pilz S, Marz W, Michaelsson K, Lundqvist A, Jassal SK, Barrett-Connor E, Zhang C, Eaton CB, May HT, Anderson JL, Sesso HD. Circulating 25-hydroxy-vitamin D and risk of cardiovascular disease: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012;5:819–829. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.112.967604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Chin K, Appel LJ, Michos ED. Vitamin D, Calcium, and Cardiovascular Disease: A"D"vantageous or "D"etrimental? An Era of Uncertainty. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2017;19:5. doi: 10.1007/s11883-017-0637-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Scragg R, Stewart AW, Waayer D, et al. Effect of monthly high-dose vitamin d supplementation on cardiovascular disease in the vitamin d assessment study : A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Cardiology. 2017 doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.0175. [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Manson JE, Bassuk SS, Lee IM, Cook NR, Albert MA, Gordon D, Zaharris E, Macfadyen JG, Danielson E, Lin J, Zhang SM, Buring JE. The VITamin D and OmegA-3 TriaL (VITAL): rationale and design of a large randomized controlled trial of vitamin D and marine omega-3 fatty acid supplements for the primary prevention of cancer and cardiovascular disease. Contemp Clin Trials. 2012;33:159–171. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2011.09.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

supplement

RESOURCES