Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2017 Jul 24;12(7):e0181805. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181805

Cancer incidence rates and trends among children and adolescents in Piedmont, 1967–2011

Elena Isaevska 1,*,#, Milena Manasievska 1,#, Daniela Alessi 1, Maria Luisa Mosso 1, Corrado Magnani 2, Carlotta Sacerdote 1, Guido Pastore 1, Franca Fagioli 3, Franco Merletti 1, Milena Maule 1
Editor: Maria Fiammetta Romano4
PMCID: PMC5524393  PMID: 28742150

Abstract

In the past, increases in childhood cancer incidence were reported in Europe and North America. The aim of this study is to show updated patterns of temporal behavior using data of the Childhood Cancer Registry of Piedmont (CCRP), a region with approximately 4.5 million inhabitants in North-West Italy. CCRP has been recording incident cases in children (0–14 years) since 1967 and in adolescents (15–19) since 2000. Time trends were estimated as annual percent change (APC) over the 1976–2011 period for children, and over 2000–2011 for both children and adolescents. CCRP registered 5020 incident cases from 1967 to 2011. Incidence rates were 157 per million person-years for children (1967–2011) and 282 for adolescents (2000–2011). From 1976–2011, increasing trends were observed in children for all neoplasms (APC 1.1, 95%CI: 0.8; 1.5) and for both embryonal and non-embryonal tumors: 1.1%, (0.5; 1.6) and 1.2%, (0.7; 1.6), respectively. Increases were observed in several tumor types, including leukemia, lymphoma, central nervous system tumors and neuroblastoma. In 2000–2011, incidence rates showed mostly non statistically significant variations and large variability. The observation of trends over a long period shows that the incidence of most tumors has increased, and this is only partially explained by diagnostic changes. Large rate variability hampers interpretation of trend patterns in short periods. Given that no satisfying explanation for the increases observed in the past was ever found, efforts must be made to understand and interpret this peculiar and still ununderstood pattern of childhood cancer incidence.

Introduction

In the last decades of the previous millennium, strong and unexplained increases in the incidence of childhood tumors were observed in Europe and USA [13]. In Italy, the AIRTUM (the Italian Association of Cancer Registries) working group in its 2008 report [4] showed alarming increases in incidence rates, even emphasized by media, whereas its edition from 2012 [5] showed that incidence rates seemed to be no longer increasing. The Childhood Cancer Registry of Piedmont (CCRP) reported increasing incidence trends during the period 1967–2001 [6], specifically for leukemias, central nervous system (CNS) tumors and neuroblastomas. Taking advantage of the very long series of childhood cancer cases records of the CCRP, our aim is to show updated patterns of temporal behavior of childhood cancer incidence. We have calculated incidence rates for the whole period of CCRP registration, from 1967 to 2011, and estimated time trends in two periods: from 1976 to 2011, a long time interval covering 36 years of registration of childhood cancer cases; and from 2000–2011, and a short time interval covering the last available 12 years of registration of both childhood and adolescents cancer cases.

Methods

The Childhood Cancer Registry of Piedmont

Data were obtained from the CCRP, the oldest and largest pediatric population-based cancer Registry active in Italy. The registry has been recording cancer cases in children (0–14 years) since 1965 and in adolescents (15–19 years) since 2000. The first 2 years of registration were used to identify prevalent cases whereas data from 1967 onwards have been used to estimate the incidence. Before avaliability of the hospital admission and discharge files (from mid 90s), cases were searched through manual perusal of hospital registries and clinical records. From then on, cases are identified from the Hospital Admission and Discharge files, including hospital stays of all Piedmont residents in all Italian hospitals. The potentially relevant discharge diagnoses are then selected, and their complete clinical documentation is requested and examined by an experienced pediatrician in order to identify incident cases. Further case ascertainment is obtained from the databases of pathology departments of Piedmont hospitals, records for reimbursements for cancer treatments administered abroad, the Turin Cancer Registry and the database of the Italian Association of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology. Only CCRP authorized personnel can access individual data. Data are anonymised before statistical analysis.

CCRP data quality indicators by period of registration are shown in Table 1.

Table 1. Childhood Cancer Registry of Piedmont 1967–2011: Data quality indicators by calendar period.

Total number of cases per period (N), cases (number and percentage) identified through death certificate only (DCO), microscopically verified (MV) cases, cases with ill-defined or unspecified site (ICD-10: C26, C39, C48, C76, C80), cases based on imaging only, by calendar period of registration.

Period of registration N DCO MV Ill-defined site Imaging
n % n % n % n %
1967–1976 874 55 6.29 717 82.04 27 3.09 97 11.10
1977–1986 1078 1 0.09 994 92.21 5 0.46 78 7.24
1987–1996 921 0 0.00 887 96.31 14 1.52 32 3.47
1997–2006 1347 0 0.00 1304 96.81 24 1.78 43 3.19
2007–2011 800 0 0.00 764 95.50 3 0.38 36 4.50
Total 5020 56 1.12 4666 92.95 73 1.45 286 5.70

Cases are included in the CCRP only after positive confirmation of age and residence in Piedmont at diagnosis, verified at the residence Town Office Registrar. All diagnoses are coded using the International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, Third Edition (ICD-O-3) [7] classification and then grouped into the 12 main diagnostic groups of the International Classification of Childhood Cancer, Third Edition (ICCC-3) [8]. In the analyses we have included all malignant tumors, and malignant and benign tumors of the CNS. In addition to the ICCC groups, we analyzed embryonal tumors as a separate category. There is no widely accepted definition for embryonal tumors and different authors have used different definitions [5,912]. In the absence of a unique classifying system, we have grouped all the tumor types explicitly described in the World Health Organization (WHO)/ International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) Classification of Tumors series (“WHO blue books”) [1321] as possibly originating from the embryonic tissue.

The list of embryonal tumors includes the following ICD-O-3 morphological codes: 8902, 8910, 8912, 8959, 8960, 8963, 8970, 8972, 8973, 9110, 9270, 9290, 9310, 9330, 9342, 9362, 9370, 9371, 9372, 9392, 9470, 9471, 9472, 9473, 9474, 9480, 9490, 9500, 9501, 9502, 9508, 9510, 9511, 9512, 9513, 9520, 9521 and 9522.

From 1970 to 1975 the registration was limited to the Province of Torino.

Statistical analyses

Crude incidence rates were calculated as the number of new cases per million person-years for the 12 main ICCC diagnostic groups as well as for the most important subgroups, by age class. The analysis of incidence trends was restricted to the period 1976–2011 to include data from the whole region of Piedmont (registration was limited to the Province of Torino in the period 1970–1975) and to avoid major diagnostic changes in the diagnosis and classification of leukemia. Time trends were estimated also separately for the last available 12 years of observation (2000–2011), when the analysis is possible in both children and adolescents.

With regard to CNS tumors, we started the time trend analysis from 1982 in order to avoid biases due to improvements in diagnostics (such as the use of CT scans at the beginning of the 1980’s). Due to the heterogeneity of behavior, we also estimated time trends for all histologically verified CNS tumors by WHO grading [13]. The idea is that more sensitive diagnostic techniques might have artificially increased the incidence of slow growing tumors with lower grading but have only marginally affected the incidence of the aggressive malignant tumors with rapid growth and higher grading. Exclusion of cases with no histological verification ensures that if an increased trend is observed, this cannot be ascribed to an improved capability of identifying benign lesions that are not surgically removed.

For neuroblastomas we conducted a sensitivity analysis starting the time trend analysis from 1990, to account for the introduction of ultrasound techniques for the early detection of newborn hip dysplasia.

The trend in incidence rates over time was estimated as the annual percent change (APC) of the incidence rates, using the Joinpoint Regression Program [22]. For the calculation of APC in the 0–14 age group we used age standardized rates and their standard errors, using the world standard population (WHO 2000–2025). For the calculation of APC in the <1 and 15–19 age groups, we fitted log-linear regression models to data assuming a Poisson distribution.

Results

In 1967–2011, CCRP registered 5020 incident cases. The incidence rate of all tumor types for children (0–14 years) was 156.9 (151.3–161.6) (Table 2). In 2000–2011, the incidence rate for adolescents (15–19 years) was 281.7 (259.8–305.0) (Table 2). There was a statistically significant increase in incidence rates of all tumor types in children for the overall period starting 1976–2011, with APC 1.1% (0.8; 1.5), as well as of both embryonal and non-embryonal tumors: APC 1.1% (0.5; 1,6) and 1.2% (0.7; 1.6), respectively (Table 3, Fig 1). Embryonal tumors incidence peaks in the 0 age group and declines with age (Table 2, Fig 2), and their trend in the period 1976–2011 is mostly due to the increase in the first year of life, APC 1.5% (0.4; 2.7).

Table 2. Childhood Cancer Registry of Piedmont 1967–2011: Incidence rates by age groups.

Number of cases (n), incidence rates per million per year (rate) and male-to-female ratio (M/F).

Childhood cancer registry of Piedmont 1967–20111
International Classification for Childhood Cancer, Third edition
0 yrs 1–4 yrs 5–9 yrs 10–14 yrs 0–14 yrs 15–19 yrs 0–19 yrs
n rate n rate n rate n rate n rate M/F n rate n rate M/F
I Leukemias 58 34.0 654 92.2 425 45.1 302 30.5 1439 51.2 1.2 76 35.2 1515 50.0 1.2
    (a) Lymphoid leukemia 24 14.1 538 75.9 306 32.5 181 18.3 1049 37.3 1.2 36 16.7 1085 35.8 1.2
    (b) Acute myeloid leukemia 17 10.0 51 7.2 58 6.2 73 7.4 199 7.1 1.2 27 12.5 226 7.5 1.1
    (c) Chronic myeloproliferative diseases 3 1.8 4 0.6 14 1.5 15 1.5 36 1.3 1.1 8 3.7 44 1.5 0.9
    (d) Myelodysplastic syndrome 2 1.2 3 0.4 2 0.2 2 0.2 9 0.3 0.5 4 1.9 13 0.4 0.9
    (e) Unspecified and other leukemias 12 7.0 58 8.2 45 4.8 31 3.1 146 5.2 1.1 1 0.5 147 4.9 1.1
II Lymphomas 11 6.5 84 11.8 161 17.1 270 27.3 526 18.7 2.5 194 89.7 720 23.8 2.0
    (a) Hodgkin lymphoma 2 1.2 18 2.5 54 5.7 141 14.2 215 7.6 1.8 150 69.4 365 12.1 1.4
    (b) Non-Hodgkin lymphoma 2 1.2 37 5.2 70 7.4 82 8.3 191 6.8 3.2 38 17.6 229 7.6 2.7
    (c) Burkitt lymphoma 0 0 22 3.1 26 2.8 38 3.8 86 3.1 3.5 5 2.3 91 3.0 3.8
    (d) Miscellaneous lymphoreticular neoplasms 7 4.1 4 0.6 3 0.3 4 0.4 18 0.6 2.0 1 0.5 19 0.6 1.7
    (e) Unspecified lymphomas 0 0 3 0.4 8 0.8 5 0.5 16 0.6 4.3 0 0 16 0.5 4.3
III Central nervous system tumors 50 29.3 294 41.5 378 40.2 309 31.2 1031 36.7 1.2 81 37.5 1112 36.7 1.2
    (a) Ependymomas and choroid plexus tumors 6 3.5 52 7.3 31 3.3 22 2.2 111 3.9 0.8 9 4.2 120 4.0 0.8
    (b) Astrocytomas 19 11.1 112 15.8 130 13.8 121 12.2 382 13.6 1.3 28 13.0 410 13.5 1.4
    (c) Intracranial and intraspinal embryonal neoplasms 13 7.6 55 7.8 81 8.6 45 4.5 194 6.9 1.7 7 3.2 201 6.6 1.8
    (d) Other gliomas 0 0 10 1.4 16 1.7 15 1.5 41 1.5 1.2 8 3.7 49 1.6 1.2
    (e) Other specified intracranial and intraspinal neoplasms 6 3.5 30 4.2 43 4.6 60 6.1 139 4.9 0.8 28 13.0 167 5.5 0.9
    (f) Unspecified intracranial and intraspinal neoplasms 6 3.5 35 4.9 77 8.2 46 4.6 164 5.8 1.0 1 0.5 165 5.5 1.0
IV Neuroblastomas 116 68.0 156 22.0 44 4.7 17 1.7 333 11.8 1.3 6 2.8 339 11.2 1.2
    (a) Neuroblastoma and ganglioneuroblastoma 116 68.0 156 22.0 44 4.7 12 1.2 328 11.7 1.2 4 1.8 332 11.0 1.2
V Retinoblastoma 39 22.9 57 8.0 6 0.6 1 0.1 103 3.7 1.6 0 0 103 3.4 1.6
VI Renal tumors 37 21.7 123 17.3 38 4.0 7 0.7 205 7.3 1.0 2 0.9 207 6.8 1.0
    (a) Nephroblastoma and other nonepithelial renal tumors 36 21.1 123 17.3 36 3.8 6 0.6 201 7.1 1.0 0 0 201 6.6 1.0
VII Hepatic tumors 15 8.8 20 2.8 5 0.5 9 0.9 49 1.7 1.2 2 0.9 51 1.7 1.2
    (a) Hepatoblastoma 14 8.2 19 2.7 0 0 3 0.3 36 1.3 1.4 0 0 36 1.2 1.4
    (b) Hepatic carcinomas; (c) Unspecified malignant hepatic tumors 1 0.6 1 0.1 5 0.5 6 0.6 13 0.5 1.3 2 0.9 15 0.5 0.9
VIII Malignant bone tumors 3 1.8 10 1.4 62 6.6 161 16.3 236 8.5 1.0 34 15.7 270 8.9 1.0
    (a) Ostosarcomas 0 0 1 0.1 31 3.3 96 9.7 128 4.6 0.9 20 9.3 148 4.9 1.1
    (c) Ewing tumor and related sarcomas of the bone 0 0 8 1.1 23 2.4 49 4.9 80 2.8 1.2 11 5.1 91 3.0 1.2
    (c) Other specified malignant bone tumors 2 1.2 0 0 3 0.3 5 0.5 10 0.4 1.0 0 0 10 0.3 1.0
    (d) Unspecified malignant bone tumors 1 0.6 1 0.1 4 0.4 6 0.6 12 0.4 0.3 0 0 12 0.3 0.3
IX Soft tissue and other extraosseous sarcomas 22 12.9 74 10.4 67 7.1 79 8.0 242 8.6 1.2 37 17.1 279 9.2 1.3
    (a)Rhabdomyosarcomas 9 5.3 54 7.6 35 3.7 22 2.2 120 4.3 1.1 9 4.2 129 4.3 1.2
    (b), (c), (d), (e)2 13 7.6 20 2.8 32 3.4 57 5.7 122 4.3 1.3 28 13.0 150 5.0 1.3
X Germ cell tumors 25 14.7 30 4.2 23 2.4 35 3.5 113 4.0 0.7 56 25.9 169 5.6 1.3
    (a) Intracranial and intraspinal germ cell tumors 6 3.5 1 0.1 8 0.8 10 1.1 25 0.9 1.1 2 0.9 27 0.9 1.1
    (b) Malignant extracranial and extragonadal germ cell tumors 12 7.0 18 2.5 2 0.2 0 0 32 1.1 0.4 1 0.5 33 1.1 0.4
    (c) Malignant gonadal germ cell tumors 7 4.1 11 1.6 10 1.1 24 2.4 52 1.9 0.9 49 22.7 101 3.3 2.3
XI Other malignant epithelial neoplasms and malignant melanomas 1 0.6 4 0.6 28 3.0 79 8.0 112 4.0 0.9 120 55.5 232 7.7 0.9
    (a) Thyroid carcinomas 0 0 1 0.1 10 1.1 34 3.4 45 1.6 0.6 59 27.3 104 3.4 0.6
    (b) Malignant melanomas 0 0 0 0 6 0.6 11 1.1 17 0.6 0.7 31 14.3 48 1.6 0.7
XII Other and unspecified malignant neoplasms 4 2.3 12 1.7 2 0.2 4 0.4 22 0.8 1.2 1 0.5 23 0.8 1.1
All embryonal tumors 225 132.0 448 63.2 189 20.1 82 8.3 944 33.6 1.3 17 7.9 961 31.7 1.3
All non-embryonal tumors 156 91.5 1070 150.9 1050 111.5 1191 120.3 3467 123.3 1.2 592 273.8 4059 134.1 1.2
All tumor types 381 223.4 1518 214.1 1239 131.6 1273 128.5 4411 156.9 1.3 609 281.7 5020 165.8 1.3

1The period 1970–1975 is restricted to the Province of Torino. Data for adolescents (15–19) are available from 2000. Myelodysplasias are available from 2000 (n = 13).

2The composite category includes cases from the following subgroups: ICCC IXb Fibrosarcomas, peripheral nerve sheath tumors, and other fibrous neoplasms, IXc Kaposi sarcoma, IXd Other specified soft tissue sarcomas and IXe Unspecified soft tissue sarcomas

Table 3. Childhood Cancer Registry of Piedmont 1976–2011: Number of cases (n) and annual percent change (APC) with corresponding 95% confidence interval.

Childhood cancer registry of Piedmont 1976–20111 1976–2011 2000–20112
International Classification for Childhood Cancer, Third edition 0–14 yrs 0-14yrs 15–19
n APC (95%CI) n APC (95%CI) n APC (95%CI)
I Leukemias 1168 0.6 (0.0; 1.2) 378 -0.6 (-5.4; 4.4) 76 2.0 (-5.3; 9.9)
    (a) Lymphoid leukemia 931 0.9 (0.3; 1.4) 306 -0.2 (-4.7; 4.5) 36 7.1 (-0.7; 15.7)
    (b) Acute myeloid leukemia 180 -0.7 (-4.7; 3.5) 46 2.1 (-35.3; 61.2) 27 2.2 (-6.4; 11.4)
II Lymphomas 449 1.7 (0.6; 2.7) (a) 151 -1.4 (-6.8; 4.3) 194 -1.7 (-5.6; 2.3)
-12.2 (-33.2; 15.4)
    (a) Hodgkin lymphoma 182 2.2 (-1.7; 6.3) 70 -2.3 (-9.1; 5.0) 150 -0.5 (-4.9; 4.1)
    (b) Non-Hodgkin lymphoma 156 -1.0 (-5.0; 3.2) 43 39.6 (-20.3; 144.6) 38 -3.2 (-13.1; 7.8)
III CNS tumors3 728 1.8 (0.9; 2.7) 323 -0.3 (-4.5; 4.2) 81 4.6 (-3.0; 12.9)
    (a) Ependymomas and choroid plexus tumors 90 4.8 (-6.1; 16.9) 41 -4.5 (-13.0; 4.9) 9 (b)
    (b) Astrocytomas 288 1.2 (-0.4; 2.8) 122 -3.0 (-8.7; 3.1) 28 5.6 (-5.4; 18.7)
    (c) Intracranial and intraspinal embryonal neoplasms 131 1.7 (0.1; 3.4) 55 3.8 (-4.8; 13.1) 7 (b)
IV Neuroblastomas 286 1.2 (0.2; 2.1) 114 -2.4 (-7.0; 2.5) 6 (b)
    (a) Neuroblastoma and ganglioneuroblastoma 282 1.1 (0.2; 2.1) 113 -2.5 (-7.3; 2.6) 4 (b)
V Retinoblastoma 81 0.7 (-11.1; 14.2) 24 -9.9 (-49.5; 60.5) 0 (b)
VI Renal tumors 167 0.2 (-1.1; 1.5) 54 -4.5 (-10.7; 2.2) 2 (b)
    (a) Nephroblastoma and other nonepithelial renal tumors 164 0.2 (-1.1; 1.5) 53 -4.5 (-10.6; 2.2) 0 (b)
VII Hepatic tumors 42 3.8 (-13.4; 24.4) 17 195.9 (6.6; 721.7) 2 (b)
    (a) Hepatoblastoma 30 8.1 (-13.4; 34.9) 13 209.0 (-1.2; 866.5) 0 (b)
VIII Malignant bone tumors 190 0.0 (-4.1; 4.4) 51 -4.1 (-14.8; 7.9) 34 9.2 (-1.9; 21.4)
    (c) Ewing tumor and related sarcomas of the bone 74 -5.9 (-18.9; 9.1) 20 -7.6 (-75.0; 242.1) 11 (b)
IX Soft tissue and other extraosseous sarcomas 206 0.5 (-0.7; 1.7) 64 -4.8 (-12.2; 3.2) 37 -2.3 (-12.0; 8.6)
    (a)Rhabdomyosarcomas 144 -1.9 (-8.3; 4.9) 33 6.6 (-52.2; 137.7) 9 (b)
X Germ cell tumors 94 2.4 (-5.9; 11.5) 35 -25.5 (-56.3; 27.1) 56 -3.1 (-9.7; 4.1)
    (a), (b), (c) 91 2.7 (-5.8; 11.9) 35 -25.5 (-56.3; 27.1) 52 -2.6 (-9.0; 4.2)
XI Other malignant epithelial neoplasms and malignant melanoma 88 3.9 (-1.4; 9.5) 41 27.9 (-20.4; 105.8) 120 2.4 (-3.2; 8.3)
    (a) Thyroid carcinomas 37 20.4 (-2.3; 48.3) 17 125.8 (-23.6; 567.5) 59 3.7 (-6.3; 14.8)
    (b) Malignant melanomas 12 14.3 (-8.0; 42.1) 5 (b) 31 -1.1 (-13.5; 13.1)
XII Other and unspecified malignant neoplasms 6 (b) 2 (b) 1 (b)
All embryonal tumors 801 1.1 (0.5; 1.6) 289 -0.6 (-3.6; 2.6) 17 -4.5 (-15.8; 8.3)
All non-embryonal tumors 2857 1.2 (0.7; 1.6) 965 -1.0 (-4.0; 2.1) 592 0.3 (-2.3; 2.9)
All tumor types 3658 1.1 (0.8; 1.5) 1254 -0.9 (-3.4; 1.7) 609 0.9 (-1.8; 3.5)

1Data for adolescents (15–19) are available from 2000. Myelodysplasias are available from 2000 (n = 13).

2APC for the period 2000–2011 was calculated including myelodysplasias.

3 Number of cases and the APCs for CNS tumors were estimated from 1982–2011

(a) Breakpoint in 2007

(b) APC not estimated because of insufficient number of cases

Fig 1. Childhood Cancer Registry of Piedmont 1967–2011: Incidence rates in children and adolescents by 3 year periods.

Fig 1

(Data for adolescents available from 2000).

Fig 2. Childhood Cancer Registry of Piedmont 1967–2011: Incidence rates in children and adolescents by single year of age.

Fig 2

(Data for adolescents available from 2000).

Leukemia is the most common cancer type in children. Acute lymphoid leukemia (ALL) accounts for around 73% of all leukemia cases. ALL incidence peaks in the 1–4 year age group, with a rate of 75.9 (69.6; 82.6) in the whole observation period (1967–2011) (Table 2, Fig 2). We found a statistically significant increase in all leukemias incidence rates in the period 1976–2011, APC 0.6% (0.0; 1.2), which seems mainly driven by the increase of ALL, APC 0.9% (0.3; 1.4) (Table 3).

Lymphomas are the most common cancer type in adolescents. Their incidence rates in children are 18.7 (17.1–20.4) and 89.7 (77.6–103.3) in adolescents (Table 2). Male predominance is remarkable in both Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) and Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) (Table 2). HL incidence rate among adolescents is particularly high, 69.4 (58.7–81.4) (Table 2). In children, the overall (1976–2011) time trend for all lymphomas exhibited a breakpoint, with increasing incidence until 2007, APC 1.7% (0.6; 2.7), followed by a non statistically significant decline afterwards (Table 3).

CNS neoplasms are the second most common cancer type in children (23.4% of all tumors) and third most common cancer type in adolescents (13.3% of all tumors), with high rates in both children 36.7 (34.5–39.0) and adolescents 37.5 (29.8–46.6) (Table 1, Fig 2). In the chosen observation period (from 1982, to account for improved diagnostic techniques, to 2011) CNS tumors exhibited a significant increase in incidence rates, APC 1.8% (0.9; 2.7) (Table 3). In the analysis by tumor grading, CNS tumors with both grade I and IV showed a strong increase, APC 3.6% (2.5; 4.8) and 2.4% (0.7; 4.2), respectively. On the contrary, grade II and III tumors (grouped together) showed an increase until 1997 APC 5.1% (0.4; 10.0) followed by a decline APC -6.4% (-11.2; -1.5). (data not shown).

The incidence rate of neuroblastoma is highest in children in their first year of life, 68.0 (56.2–81.6) (Table 2). The trend analysis showed an increase in incidence rates for the overall period (1976–2011) in all children APC 1.2% (0.2; 2.1) (Table 3) and in those in their first year of life APC 2.5% (0.7; 4.2). When we restricted the neuroblastoma trend analysis to the period 1990 to 2011, increases in time trends lost statistical significance: APC 1.7% (-0.4;3.7) for all children, and APC 2.0% (-1.5; 5.7) for <1 year old children (data not shown).

The analysis of the period 2000–2011 (with the exception of hepatoblastomas in children) showed no statistically significant variation in incidence rates, neither in children, nor in adolescents. The major ICCC groups (namely leukemias, lymphomas, CNS tumors and neuroblastomas) that showed an increase for the 1976-2011period in children, show decreasing rates in 2000–2011 (Table 3).

Discussion

Analyzing the overall time trends (1976–2011) in children, we found statistically significant increases in incidence rates in all tumors types combined, and in both embryonal and non-embryonal tumors when analysed as separate categories. In the analysis by ICCC diagnostic groups, we found increases in leukemias (mainly due to the increase of ALL), lymphomas, CNS tumors (from 1982) and neuroblastomas.

The analysis of the most recent period (2000–2011) did not provide sufficient evidence to claim that the increasing trends that have characterized the whole time series have now started inverting their tendency, since the rarity of cancer in the age groups considered is affected by large variability that hampers interpretation.

When we interpret our findings, we must consider that changes in data collection, classification or changes in diagnostic procedures might have influenced our results.

The quality and completeness of data collected from CCRP has been high and its data have been included in all major studies on childhood cancer incidence in Italy and Europe [4,5,12,23]. In the first 10 years of registration (1967–1976) there were 55 cases identified only through death certificate (DCO), but only one after 1976 (Table 1). The proportion of microscopic verification (MV) increased until the last period, where it showed a slight decline mirrored by an increase in the percentage of diagnoses exclusively based on imaging, showing increased diagnostic capacity rather than a decline in the quality of registration (Table 1). After 1975, around 95% of all cases have histological confirmation.

In our observation window, several relevant diagnostic changes occurred. From mid 1970’s the distinction between ALL and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) became reliable through the introduction of flow cytometry so that the proportion of unspecified leukemias became negligible. For CNS tumors, major diagnostic improvements included the introduction of CT scans and their widespread use in the 1980’s, followed by that of magnetic resonance in the 1990’s, and of cranial ultrasound in newborns from the 1990’s. Relevant diagnostic changes for neuroblastoma (and possibly for other embryonal abdominal neoplasms, such as nephroblastoma and hepatoblastoma) were the antenatal and perinanatal ultrasound imaging in mid 1980’s and the widespread use of hip ultrasound from mid 1990’s.

It is unlikely that improved classification explains the observed ALL increasing trends. In our data, from mid 1970’s, the proportion of unspecified leukemias has been constantly low, and that of MV cases for ALL was 100%. Increasing leukemia time trends have been observed in previous CCRP [6,24] and Italian [4,5] studies. Incidence rates in Italy mostly increased in the 1980’s until mid 1990’s, especially those of ALLs in the 1–4 age group. A similar behavior was observed in other European countries [1,2,2528], more pronouncedly in western then eastern Europe. SEER data in a similar period (1975–2013) also show an increase in leukemia rates (APC 0.7%, p<0.05) [3].

HL behavior is particularly interesting because Italian rates among children and adolescents (0–19 years old) are the highest of the world [29]. In USA [30] and Nordic countries [31], rates were approximately half of those observed in Piedmont and in Italy [5]. (Table 4) Our analysis did not show statistically significant trends for HL, but showed an increase in all lymphomas considered together in 0–14 years old up to 2007, followed by a decrease. APC was higher for HL than for all lymphomas (2.2 vs 1.7). A previous CCRP study [6] for the period 1967–2001, found a statistically significant increased incidence rates for HL in 10–14 year old children.

Table 4. Hodgkin lymphoma rates by age group and gender in Piedmont, Italy, Nordic countries and the USA.

0–4 yrs 5–9 yrs 10–14 yrs 15–19 yrs
Boys Girls Boys Girls Boys Girls Boys Girls
CCRP (2000–2011) 3.5 0 10.9 2.9 23.9 24.3 66.4 72.6
AIRTUM (2003–2008) 7.7 2.9 25.0 27.8 58.3 71.3
NORDCAN (2000–2013) 1.0 0 5.0 1.0 13.0 12.0 34.0 40.0
SEER1 (2000–2013) 0.6 0.4 5.8 2.6 12.4 12.1 34.8 35.6

CCRP = Childhood Cancer Registry of Piedmont; AIRTUM = Italian Association of Cancer Registries; NORDCAN = Association of the Nordic Cancer Registries; SEER = Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program

1 The rates from SEER refer to numbers from 9 SEER registries, race: white.

The AIRTUM working group [5] found an increase in children for all lymphomas up to 1999 and a decline afterwards. In Europe, for the period 1975–1997, the increase in HL was found in both the 10–14 (AAPC (average annual percent change) 1%) and the 15–19 (AAPC 3.5%) age groups[32]. In USA, HL showed a decline (1975–2013, 0–19 years, APC -0.6%, p<0.05) and NHL an increase (1975–2013, 0–19 years, APC1.1%, p<0.05) [3].

There were previous reports of increasing trends of CNS tumors in Europe and USA [3335]. The Automated Childhood Cancer Information System study on childhood CNS tumors [33] reported increased incidence in Europe in the period 1978–1997, that the authors partly explained with improved diagnostic methods and changes in classification and registration. In Italy, the AIRTUM study [5] found increasing trends in all CNS tumors considered together, but the analysis restricted to those with malignant behavior showed stable rates. In Piedmont, a previous study analyzing trends from 1967–2001 [6] found significantly increasing CNS tumor trends that showed a constant gradual change rather than a step-increase that usually follows the introduction of new diagnostic techniques. In our analysis, we found statistically significant increases in incidence rates of CNS tumors even after starting the analysis from 1982 to account for the introduction of CT scans. When we looked into the incidence pattern of CNS by WHO grade, we found that grade I tumors that are more likely to be affected by improvements in diagnostics, have indeed been increasing. However, also the incidence of highly malignant grade IV tumors has been increasing. Given the rapidly growing and aggressive nature of these tumors, it is unlikely that a diagnostic anticipation may translate into an apparent increasing trend, thus leading us to the conclusion that the increasing trends of CNS tumors might reflect a true change in the risk factors patterns of exposure.

In Europe, the incidence of embryonal tumors like neuroblastoma, nephroblastoma and, to a lesser extent, retinoblastoma and hepatoblastoma, seem to have increased [1,11,3639]. The significant increases for all embryonal tumors for the overall period, are mostly due to the increase in rates of cases diagnosed in the first year of life. This increase might be partly due to introduction of antenatal and perinanatal ultrasound imaging in Italy in the mid 1980’s and the use of hip ultrasound from around 1995, especially for tumors that in a small proportion may regress spontaneously, such as neuroblastoma. Indeed, when the trend analysis was restricted to the period 1990–2011, increases in time trends for neuroblastoma persisted but lost statistical significance and time trends from 2000 show decreasing rates for embryonal tumors in children, including neuroblastoma and retinoblastoma. Hepatoblastomas, however, showed an increase, although our analysis is based on small numbers.

In conclusion, in Piedmont, the analysis of trends over a long period (1976–2011) shows that the incidence of most tumor types has increased. When we looked more closely at the most recent years of observation (2000–2011), we found that rates seem to have started levelling off. However, large variability hampers interpretation of trends pattern in short periods. In Europe, the upward trends were detected more then 12 years ago, but as yet no satisfying explanation for the past increases has been found. Efforts must be made to understand and interpret this peculiar and still ununderstood pattern of incidence of childhood cancer.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Master of Epidemiology (University of Turin). Elena Isaevska and Milena Manasievska acknowledge two scholarships from the European Commission through the Erasmus Mundus for Western Balkans II programme (Grant Agreement 2011-2586/001-001-EMA2). We are extremely grateful to Benedetto Terracini for many useful discussions and revision of the manuscript and to Carlotta Buzzoni for her suggestions.

Data Availability

Individual data cannot be made publicly available for ethical reasons, since public availability would compromise patient confidentiality. Anonymised aggregated level data according to categorizations of variables different from those shown in the manuscript are available on request to the corresponding author.

Funding Statement

EI and MMan received scholarships from the European Commission through the Erasmus Mundus for Western Balkans II programme, Grant Agreement 2011-2586/001-001-EMA2. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Steliarova-Foucher E, Stiller C, Kaatsch P, Berrino F, Coebergh JW, Lacour B, et al. Geographical patterns and time trends of cancer incidence and survival among children and adolescents in Europe since the 1970s (the ACCIS project): an epidemiological study. Lancet. 2004;364(9451):2097–105. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17550-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kaatsch P. Epidemiology of childhood cancer. Cancer Treat Rev. 2010. June;36(4):277–85. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2010.02.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, Miller D, Bishop K, Altekruse SF, et al. (Eds). SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2013 SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2013, National Cancer Institute; Bethesda, MD, http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2013/, based on November 2015 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site, April 2016. 2016;1992–2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.AIRTUM Working Group. Italian cancer figures Report 2008. Childhood cancer: incidence, survival, trend. Epidemiol Prev. 2008;32(2):1–111. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.AIRTUM Working Group, CCM AWG. Italian cancer figures, report 2012: Cancer in children and adolescents. Epidemiol Prev. 2013;37(1):1–225. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Dalmasso P, Pastore G, Zuccolo L, Maule MM, Pearce N, Merletti F, et al. Temporal trends in the incidence of childhood leukemia, lymphomas and solid tumors in north-west Italy, 1967–2001. A report of the Childhood Cancer Registry of Piedmont. Haematologica. 2005. September 1;90(9):1197–204. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Fritz AG. International Classification of Diseases for Oncology (ICD-O). World Heal Organ; 2000;240. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Steliarova-Foucher E, Stiller C, Lacour B, Kaatsch P. International classification of childhood cancer, third edition. Cancer. 2005;103(7):1457–67. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20910 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Willis RA. The Borderland of Embryology and Pathology: The Middleton-Goldsmith Lecture. Bull New York Acad Med 1950;26(7)440–460. 1950;26(7):440:460. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Gatta G, Ferrari A, Stiller CA, Pastore G, Bisogno G, Trama A, et al. Embryonal cancers in Europe. Eur J Cancer. 2012;48(10):1425–33. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.12.027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Tulla M, Berthold F, Graf N, Rutkowski S, von Schweinitz D, Spix C, et al. Incidence, Trends, and Survival of Children With Embryonal Tumors. Pediatrics. 2015;136(3):e623–32. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-0224 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.AIRTUM Working Group. Italian cancer figures. Report 2015: The burden of rare cancers in Italy. Epidemiol Prev. 2015;40(1):1–120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, Cavenee WK, Burger PC, Jouvet A, et al. The 2007 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system (vol 114, pg 97, 2007). Acta Neuropathol. 2007;114:547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Fletcher CDM, Bridge JA, Hogendoorn PCW MF, editor. WHO Classification of Tumours of Soft Tissue and Bone WHO/IARC Classification of Tumours, 4th Edition, Volume 5. 2013
  • 15.DeLellis RA, Lloyd RV, Heitz PU EC, editor. Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of Endocrine Organs WHO/IARC Classification of Tumours, 3rd Edition, Volume 8. 2004.
  • 16.Bosman FT, Carneiro F, Hruban RH TN, editor. WHO Classification of Tumours of the Digestive System WHO/IARC Classification of Tumours, 4th Edition, Volume 3. 2010.
  • 17.Travis WD, Brambilla E, Müller-Hermelink HK HC, editor. Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of the Lung, Pleura, Thymus and Heart WHO/IARC Classification of Tumours, 3rd Edition, Volume 10. 2004.
  • 18.Eble JN, Sauter G, Epstein J SI, editor. Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of the Urinary System and Male Genital Organs WHO/IARC Classification of Tumours, 3rd Edition, Volume 7. 2004.
  • 19.Barnes L, Eveson JW, Reichart P SD, editor. Pathology and Genetics of Head and Neck Tumours WHO/IARC Classification of Tumours, 3rd Edition, Volume 9. 2005.
  • 20.Tavassoli FA DP, editor. Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of the Breast and Female Genital Organs WHO/IARC Classification of Tumours, 3rd Edition, Volume 4. 2003.
  • 21.Campbell RJ. Histological Classification of Tumours of the Eye and Its Adnexa In: Histological Typing of Tumours of the Eye and Its Adnexa. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 1998. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.National Cancer Institute. Joinpoint Regression Program—Surveillance Research Program. June 2015. Available from: http://surveillance.cancer.gov/joinpoint/
  • 23.Steliarova-Foucher E, Kaatsch P, Lacour B, Pompe-Kirn V, Eser S, Miranda A, et al. Quality, comparability and methods of analysis of data on childhood cancer in Europe (1978–1997): report from the Automated Childhood Cancer Information System project. Eur J Cancer. 2006;42(13):1915–51. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2006.05.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Magnani C, Dalmasso P, Pastore G, Terracini B, Martuzzi M, Mosso ML, et al. Increasing incidence of childhood leukemia in Northwest Italy, 1975–98. Int J Cancer. 2003;105(4):552–7. doi: 10.1002/ijc.11112 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.McNally RJ, Cairns DP, Eden OB, Kelsey a M, Taylor GM, Birch JM. Examination of temporal trends in the incidence of childhood leukaemias and lymphomas provides aetiological clues. Leuk Off J Leuk Soc Am Leuk Res Fund, UK. 2001;15(10):1612–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kroll ME, Draper GJ, Stiller CA, Murphy MFG. Childhood leukemia incidence in Britain, 1974–2000: Time trends and possible relation to influenza epidemics. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006;98(6):417–20. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djj095 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Spix C, Eletr D, Blettner M, Kaatsch P. Temporal trends in the incidence rate of childhood cancer in Germany 1987–2004. Int J Cancer. 2008;122(8):1859–67. doi: 10.1002/ijc.23281 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Dreifaldt AC, Carlberg M, Hardell L. Increasing incidence rates of childhood malignant diseases in Sweden during the period 1960–1998. Eur J Cancer. 2004;40(9):1351–60. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2004.02.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Linet MS, Brown LM, Mbulaiteye SM, Check D, Ostroumova E, Landgren A, et al. International long-term trends and recent patterns in the incidence of leukemias and lymphomas among children and adolescents ages 0–19 years. Int J Cancer. 2016;138(8):1862–74. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29924 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (www.seer.cancer.gov) SEER*Stat Database: Incidence—SEER 9 Regs Research Data N 2015 S (1973–2013). National Cancer Institute, DCCPS, Surveillance Research Program, Surveillance Systems Branch, released April 2016, based on the November 2015 submission.
  • 31.Engholm G, Ferlay J, Christensen N, Kejs AMT, Hertzum-Larsen R, Johannesen TB, et al. NORDCAN: Cancer Incidence, Mortality, Prevalence and Survival in the Nordic Countries, Version 7.3 (08.07.2016). Association of the Nordic Cancer Registries. Danish Cancer Society. Available from http://www.ancr.nu, accessed 22/07/2016).
  • 32.Clavel J, Steliarova-Foucher E, Berger C, Danon S, Valerianova Z. Hodgkin’s disease incidence and survival in European children and adolescents (1978–1997): Report from the Automated Cancer Information System project. Eur J Cancer. 2006;42(13):2037–49. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2006.05.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Peris-Bonet R, Martínez-García C, Lacour B, Petrovich S, Giner-Ripoll B, Navajas A, et al. Childhood central nervous system tumours—incidence and survival in Europe (1978–1997): Report from Automated Childhood Cancer Information System project. Eur J Cancer. 2006;42(13):2064–80. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2006.05.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Smith MA, Freidlin B, Ries LAG, Simon R. Trends in reported incidence of primary malignant brain tumors in children in the United States. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998;90(17):1269–1277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Arora R, Alston R, Eden T, Estlin E, Moran A, Birch J. Age-incidence patterns of primary CNS tumors in children, adolescents, and adults in England. Neuro Oncol. 2009;11(4):403–13. doi: 10.1215/15228517-2008-097 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Spix C, Pastore G, Sankila R, Stiller CA, Steliarova-Foucher E. Neuroblastoma incidence and survival in European children (1978–1997): Report from the Automated Childhood Cancer Information System project. Eur J Cancer. 2006;42(13):2081–91. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2006.05.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Pastore G, Znaor A, Spreafico F, Graf N, Pritchard-Jones K S-FE. Malignant renal tumours incidence and survival in European children (1978–1997): Report from the Automated Childhood Cancer Information System project. Eur J Cancer. 2006;42(13):2103–14. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2006.05.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.MacCarthy A, Draper GJ, Steliarova-Foucher E, Kingston JE. Retinoblastoma incidence and survival in European children (1978–1997). Report from the Automated Childhood Cancer Information System project. Eur J Cancer. 2006;42(13):2092–102. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2006.06.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Stiller CA, Pritchard J S-FE. Liver cancer in European children: incidence and survival, 1978–1997. Report from the Automated Childhood Cancer Information System project. Eur J Cancer. 2006;42(13):2115–23. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2006.05.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Individual data cannot be made publicly available for ethical reasons, since public availability would compromise patient confidentiality. Anonymised aggregated level data according to categorizations of variables different from those shown in the manuscript are available on request to the corresponding author.


Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES