Skip to main content
Transactions of the American Clinical and Climatological Association logoLink to Transactions of the American Clinical and Climatological Association
. 2017;128:222–233.

Cigarette Smoke and DNA Cleavage Promote Lung Inflammation and Emphysema

FARRAH KHERADMAND 1,✉,1, R YOU 1, BON HEE GU 1, DB CORRY 1
PMCID: PMC5525399  PMID: 28790504

Abstract

Smoking-related lung diseases are among the most preventable and incurable ailments in the world. Smokers are at increased risk of developing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease that can be further complicated by emphysema and lung cancer. A subset of former smokers shows persistent lung inflammation and progressive loss of lung function, indicating a role for activation of acquired immunity in smoking-induced lung diseases. In addition to the well-established noxious effects of volatile compounds in cigarette smoke, incomplete combustion of tobacco generates nano-sized carbon black (nCB) that accumulate in lung myeloid dendritic cells and macrophages. Experimentally, intra-nasal instillation nCB can cause airway inflammation and emphysema in mice, underscoring their pathogenic role in inflammatory lung diseases. High throughput analyses of macrophages that have engulfed nCB reveal de novo activation of DNA repair enzymes, and histological studies provide evidence for DNA double-stranded breaks. Emphysematous lung myeloid dendritic cells that contain nCB express pro-inflammatory cytokines, and can efficiently differentiate naive CD4 T cells to interferon-g–secreting T helper 1 and interleukin 17A expressing cell subsets. Together these findings indicate that nCB accumulation in lung innate immune cells can initiate and sustain lung inflammation and promote emphysema development.

INTRODUCTION

Over the past 50 years, the US government and several private foundations have disseminated information highlighting cigarette smoking hazards and have sponsored awareness programs in schools to educate children and reduce tobacco consumption in young adults (1). Although these efforts have been successful and have reduced smoking prevalence in the United States, globally, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) morbidity and mortality rates attributed to tobacco continue to rise (2,3). China and India, two of the most populous countries in the world, lack educational programs and disproportionately produce and consume tobacco products (4). The continual rise in smoking prevalence in these developing countries is alarming because, if this trend continues, tobacco smoking is projected to cause approximately one billion deaths by the end of the 21st century (4).

Chronic exposure to first- and second-hand smoke is associated with an expanding list of malignancies (5), respiratory diseases (e.g., COPD, chronic bronchitis, emphysema) (6,7), and cardiovascular-related injuries including stroke and heart diseases (8–10). Other less frequent tobacco-associated conditions include infection of the lower respiratory tract (e.g., tuberculosis, pneumonia, etc.), chronic inflammatory diseases such as diabetes, and arthritis, as well as gastrointestinal ailments (Crohn’s disease and colitis) (4). Initial studies using autopsy specimens reported an intense recruitment of innate immune cells (e.g., neutrophils and macrophages) in the lungs of asymptomatic smokers (11). However, in the past decade, several laboratories have identified a causative role for activated B and T lymphocytes (adaptive immunity), and myeloid dendritic cells (mDCs) in COPD pathogenesis (12–15). Notably, we have shown that lung mDCs from human smokers show increased expression of SPP1, and reduced expression of peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma (PPAR-g), that parallels findings in an experimental model of emphysema (16).

One of the hallmarks of long-term smoking is a blackening of the lung tissue that persists despite smoking cessation. Previously little was known about the composition of the substance that causes this blackening, or its significance in emphysema development. By studying lung tissue obtained from smokers with emphysema, we have shown that the black substance is composed of nano-sized particles of elemental carbon (17). Incomplete combustion of tobacco generates nanoparticle carbon black (nCB) that accumulate in mDCs, and can cause emphysema in mice (17,18). Closer examination of the lung damage caused by nCB revealed that they trigger DNA double-stranded breakages (DSBs), which lead to lung inflammation (17). Lung macrophages and mDCs phagocytose nCB in the lungs and carry them to lung draining lymph nodes. However, nCB accumulation in the lungs can cause repeated cycles of phagocytosis and cell necrosis that perpetuate sterile lung inflammation, and induce cellular damage. These paradigm- shifting findings indicate that nCB, and by extension anthracotic pigments, cause sterile inflammation in the lungs, and could explain adverse health outcomes seen in former smokers.

Degradation of lung elastin in smokers

Elastin fibers absorb mechanical stress and provide the elasticity required for lung and blood vessel integrity (19). This critical function is lost when alveoli and surrounding capillary beds are destroyed in response to smoking induced lung inflammation (20–22). The pathophysiology of emphysema in the setting of tobacco smoking and deficiency of the elastase inhibitor, alpha 1 anti-trypsin is related to excess of elastolytic proteinases (23–25). Nonetheless, the heterogeneous nature of emphysema in active or former (ever)–smokers that spans the spectrum of no disease to the most severe and debilitating forms of dynamic hyperinflation despite smoking cessation, remains poorly understood (26–28). There is growing interest in understanding the factors that initiate and perpetuate lung destruction in response to chronic smoke. Our team has dissected the pathophysiology of smoke-induced acquired immune responses against elastin molecules in smokers with emphysema (13,29–33). Specifically, we have shown that smokers with emphysema harbor activated T helper subsets in their lungs and persistence of autoreactive T cells is associated with increased rate of physiological decline (30,32,34).

Pre-clinical models of emphysema

Several important pathogenic mechanisms of smoke-induced lung disease have been addressed in animal models of emphysema that share many characteristics with human disease (35). Genetic susceptibility to cigarette smoke was studied in five different strains of inbred mice over 6 months. Three of five strains (C57BL6/J, A/J, and SJ/L) that were tested showed changes in mean linear intercepts (an indicator of emphysema), but the inflammatory cell and cytokine profiles, critical features of cigarette smoke–induced emphysema, varied unpredictably among these strains (36). Transgenic models of emphysema have further been instrumental to our current understanding of its pathophysiology: deletion of macrophage metalloproteinase (MMP) 12 rendered animals resistant to cigarette smoke–induced emphysema, showing the potential importance of MMP12 in emphysema (37,38). Overexpression of interferon gamma (IFN-g) targeted to the lung further results in spontaneous development of emphysema and accumulation of innate inflammatory cells in the lung (39). Animal models of acute emphysema using purified papain or elastase showed that elastic fiber repair is associated with formation of secondary inflammation that leads to secretory cell metaplasia comparable to chronic bronchitis (40,41). Although a role for CD8+ T cells in a cigarette- smoke–exposed model of emphysema has been proposed (42), CD4+ T helper responses have recently been shown to play a role in animal models of emphysema (43). Although interleukin 17 (IL17) T helper (Th17) cells have been associated with many human diseases (44,45), their involvement in human emphysema, and mouse model of emphysema was shown (46). Increased levels of IL-17A have been detected in lung tissue and peripheral blood mononuclear cells of emphysema patients consistent with chronic autoreactive inflammatory disease that target the lung parenchyma (30,47). IL-17A was also found in sputum of COPD patients, but to a lesser extent than found in asthma patients (48). Mice exposed to tobacco smoke also had increased IL-17A in the lungs, and mice deficient in Il-17a or its receptor showed attenuated emphysema, indicating its critical requirement emphysema development (46,49,50). These findings indicate there is strong association between Th17-related cytokines with emphysema, but the full extent of mediators involved in induction of Th17 in response to cigarette smoke is now emerging.

Innate and adaptive immunity in smokers with emphysema: autoimmunity and emphysema

T cells that home to the lung secrete distinct repertoires of cytokines that distinguish them classically into T helper 1(Th1) (secreting IL-2 and IFN-g), Th2 (secreting IL-4, IL-5 and IL-13) (51), Th17 (secreting IL-17A, IL-17F, IL-22, IL-23) (52), and T regulatory (secreting IL-10, transforming growth factor beta) (53) subsets. Several published systematic studies of peripheral lung T effector cells in smoking subjects have emphasized the over-riding importance of CD4 T cells to the development of emphysema (13,54,55). Isolated peripheral blood CD4+ T cells from emphysema but not control subjects released IFN-g and IL-10, but not IL-13, when stimulated with lung elastin peptides and this correlated positively with the severity of emphysema (29). Further, blocking major histocompatibility complex class II molecules attenuated T cell responses to elastin peptides, confirming the specific nature of CD4 T cell activation that required presentation of antigen in the context of major histocompatibility complex class II molecules (29). These findings have shown a strong association between memory T cell responses to a self-antigen (lung elastin peptides) and severity of emphysema. Mechanistically, Th1-related chemokines [e.g., interferon gamma inducible protein-10 (IP-10) or C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 10 (CXCL10)] control the secretion of elastolytic MMPs, further providing a link between the autoimmune Th1 response and the degradation of elastin (13). However, rather than a bystander target of an otherwise unrelated Th1 response, elastin is specifically targeted by a powerful type 1 immune response. We further showed that Th17 cells are also present in the peripheral lung of smokers with emphysema and, similar to Th1 cells, are auto-reactive against elastin and promote elastolysis by innate immune cells through IL-17A and C-C motif chemokine ligand 20 (CCL20) (30).

Thus, although chronic lung destruction in some smokers appears to be perpetuated by auto-reactive Th1 and Th17 cells, the mechanism by which these cells, and no other T cell subsets such as T regulatory cells and Th2 cells, are selectively activated in emphysema remain obscure. Because airway myeloid dendritic cells (mDCs), also known as antigen-presenting cells, are among the first cells to encounter environmental irritants such as cigarette smoke and are essential initiators of T helper cell differentiation, we examined the function of mDCs in T cell differentiation that favors Th1 and Th17 responses (46).

SPP1 gene encoding osteopontin, a pleiotropic cytokine that is implicated in autoimmune responses, is highly expressed in mDCs isolated from lung tissue of former smokers with emphysema (16). We showed that PPAR-g expression was downregulated in mDCs of smokers with emphysema and mice exposed to chronic smoke (16). Conditional knockout of Ppar-γ in dendritic cells (DCs) (CD11c+) in mice resulted in increased recruitment of activated mDCs, whereas loss of osteopontin (encoded by SPP1) in these mice prevented inf lammation and emphysema development (16). These findings suggest a homeostatic anti-inflammatory role for PPAR-g whereby it negatively regulates SPP1 expression in the lung. In support of this, 2 months of PPAR-γ agonist treatment in wild-type mice reversed emphysema despite continuous smoke exposure, and endogenous PPAR-γ agonists were found to be reduced in the plasma of smokers with emphysema (16).

These findings revealed a pro-inflammatory pathway in which reduced PPAR-γ activity promotes emphysema pathogenesis and using agonists; this pathway can be readily targeted in smokers to prevent and or reverse emphysema. In addition to discovering the molecular pathways involved in emphysema pathogenesis, we also focused on the physical appearance of the mDCs in smokers with emphysema. We observed that mDCs isolated from emphysematous lung tissue are discolored and appear darker in color when compared to the same cell population isolated from the lungs of non-smokers or light smokers without emphysema. Therefore, next we examined the nature and physical property of the particulate matter present in mDCs isolated from the lungs of former heavy smokers.

Identification of nano-sized carbon black in lung mDCs

Histopathological analysis of the lungs of heavy smokers invariably reveals dark-staining (anthracotic) pigment, often attributed to poorly soluble material found in tobacco smoke (56). Anthracotic pigment is also found in the lymph nodes of smokers (57), but because its presence in lung tissue and lymph nodes had been considered benign (56), its chemical composition and potential contribution to smoking-related diseases had not been explored. We isolated the insoluble particulate (e.g., anthracotic) material after complete proteolytic digestion of human lung, and identified the residual black material as aggregates of 20 nm to 50 nm spheroids that were composed of nCB. Raman spectroscopy, hyperspectral imaging, and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy confirmed that nCB accumulates specifically in CD1a+ lung mDCs and alveolar macrophages (17).

Experimentally, mice exposed to smoke also accumulate nCB in the lung macrophages and mDCs. Moreover, delivered by chronic exposure to cigarette smoke or purified preparation intranasally, nCB persist indefinitely in mouse lung, can activate lung mDCs, and promote Th17 cell differentiation mediated by the inflammasome assembly in phagocytes (17,18). Notably, we found that highly hydrophobic form of nCB found in smoker’s lungs can cause DNA DSBs, the most ominous form of DNA damage in eukaryotic cells, and activate inappropriate DNA repair responses that have been linked to induction of genomic instability, and accelerated cellular aging (17,58,59).

Increasing the polarity or size of nCB mitigated many adverse effects because larger and less hydrophobic particles abrogated phosphorylation of histone 2AX (γH2AX), an indicator of cellular DSBs. We have also used high-resolution imaging techniques to examine the effect of nCB size and polarity on cellular uptake and localization within lung mDCs. In addition to changes in polarity of nCB using polyethylene glycol formulation (17), we have used several sizes (50 nm to 500 nm) of nCB in isolated lung mDCs and in animal models to examine their proinflammatory function in the lungs (17). These studies have confirmed that small (50-nm to 70-nm) hydrophobic nCB can be detected within cellular vesicles and the nucleus and these properties are critical for induction of sterile inflammation in the lungs (Figures 1 and 2).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Schematic diagram of cigarette smoke–induced innate and adaptive immune mediated lung destruction. Cigarette smoke can initiate recruitment of activated innate immune cells such as neutrophils and macrophages into the lungs. Secretion of tissue degrading enzymes, such as neutrophil elastase and matrix metalloproteinases, can digest lung parenchyma and release fragments (e.g., elastin) that can act as self-antigens. Lung myeloid dendritic cells (mDCs) process self-antigens and present them in context of major histocompatibility class II molecules to self-reactive CD4+ T cells. In response to cognate antigen, T cells proliferate and secrete cytokines and chemokines that promote emphysema development. In addition, particulate matter such as nanoparticle carbon black (nCB) generated by incomplete combustion of tobacco can accumulate in the lungs and promote sterile inflammation which can accelerate T helper 1 (Th1) and Th17 cell differentiation. Abbreviations: MMP, metalloproteinase; PPARg, peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Transmission election microscopy detects nanoparticle carbon black (nCB) within cellular organelles in lung myeloid dendritic cells (mDCs). Lung mDCs from nCB-treated mice and 60-nm sections of cells displayed accumulation of nCB (A) inside cellular vesicles and (B) inside the unstained nuclear capsule; original magnification ×2000 and ×8000, respectively. Red arrows point to nCB inside lung mDCs.

Concluding remarks

Previously considered benign, anthracotic pigment generated in response to chronic smoking are composed of hydrophobic nCB particles which can induce cell damage. Accumulation of nCB in lung phagocytic cells activates the inflammasome pathway and can perpetuate lung inflammation. It remains unclear whether nCB can directly activate the inflammasome pathways and mediators that promote lung cellular damage. Studies using high-resolution transmission electron microscopy could provide an ideal approach in determining whether changes in nCB size and polarity could impact their intracellular localization and alter mDC activation in the lungs. The functional significance of nCB physical and biochemical properties, and induction of DSB (detected via γH2AX) in mDCs could further provide new insight in the mechanism of sterile inflammation and emphysema pathogenesis. Future studies are needed to understand how nCB can induce sterile inflammatory responses in the lungs of smokers with emphysema.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by the R01HL117181-01, (FK, DBC) CX000104 (FK), and CX000 (DBC) VA Merit Awards.

Footnotes

Potential Conflicts of Interest: None disclosed.

DISCUSSION

Zeidel, Boston: Very nice paper. As a nephrologist listening to this I am reminded of the proximal tubule cell, getting material in it that it can’t process in its lysosomes. So, you wonder if this carbon is getting to the lysosomes that can’t be degraded and then you get into the kinds of damaged pathways that you see in acute renal failure settings with contrast to hemoglobin and in the kidney. I wonder if that may be because you use some of these same pathways activated in that setting, that you are describing, and maybe the start of it is that the cell fills up with the stuff that it can’t degrade and then you begin to go down that pathway.

Kheradmand, Houston: So, absolutely, and I am sorry I didn’t have the full time to share with you but this work is published. Inflammasome pathways are very much important for not only activation of the immune system but also DNA damage.

Higgenbotham, Philadelphia: Thank you for your very nice paper. When I am not dancing, I am actually on the Defense Health Board where we are considering what happens to our military when they are exposed to smoke pits, and so recently, within the last couple of years, the question of lung biopsies has come up. So, my question back to you: is there something that is not invasive that we could use to identify those military, particularly with the repeated deployments so that we can actually tease out those individuals who may down the line have this peripheral damage?

Kheradmand, Houston: Those are all absolutely amazing questions... and I think that maybe sputum cytology would be a very good way to go after that.

Gravallese, Worcester: So, I just wanted to mention a very interesting animal model where researchers knocked out a DNA enzyme that degrades DNA, DNAase-2, and DNA accumulated in the lysosome, leached into the cytosol and activated these cytosolic DNA sensor pathways, one of which is an inflammasome: called the AIM-2 inflammasome. It was subsequently shown that endogenous DNA can also activate these pathways, and I am wondering what might be happening here is the activation of these cytosolic pathways staying in AIM-2; Have you thought about that?

Kheradmand, Houston: Yes, and in fact some of these experiments were published in eLIFE [Nanoparticulate carbon black in cigarette smoke induces DNA cleavage and Th17-mediated emphysema. Elife 2015;4:e09623], so I’d be happy to talk to you in person, yes it is.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Thun MJ, Apicella LF, Henley SJ. Smoking vs other risk factors as the cause of smoking-attributable deaths: confounding in the courtroom. JAMA. 2000;284(6):706–12. doi: 10.1001/jama.284.6.706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.CDC. Deaths from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease — United States, 2000–2005. JAMA. 2009;301(13):1331–33. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Prevention CfDCa. National Center for Health Statistics 2011; National Vital Statistics Reports, 2011. Deaths: Final Data for 2008. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr59/nvsr59_10.pdf. Accessed April 17, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Eriksen M, Mackay J, Schluger N, Gomeshtapeh F, Drope J, et al. The Tobacco Atlas. The Amercian Cancer Society, Inc; 2015. Contract No.: ISBN 978-1-60443-235-0. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Thun MJ, Carter BD, Feskanich D, Freedman ND, et al. 50-year trends in smoking-related mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(4):351–64. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1211127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Barnes PJ, et al. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. [review] Clin Chest Med. 2014;35(1):71–86. doi: 10.1016/j.ccm.2013.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kheradmand F, Shan M, Xu C, Corry D, et al. Autoimmunity in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: clinical and experimental evidence. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2012;8(3):285–92. doi: 10.1586/eci.12.7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Dagenais GR, Yi Q, Lonn E, Sleight P, et al. Impact of cigarette smoking in high-risk patients participating in a clinical trial. A substudy from the Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation (HOPE) trial. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehab. 2005;12(1):75–81. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Van Eeden S, Leipsic J, Paul Man SF, Sin DD, et al. The relationship between lung inflammation and cardiovascular disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012;186(1):11–6. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201203-0455PP. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mercer AJ, et al. Long-term trends in cardiovascular disease mortality and association with respiratory disease. Epidemiol Infect. 2016;144(4):777–86. doi: 10.1017/S0950268815001818. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Niewoehner DE, Kleinerman J, Rice DB, et al. Pathologic changes in the peripheral airways of young cigarette smokers. N Engl J Med. 1974;291(15):755–8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197410102911503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Cosio MG, Guerassimov A, et al. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Inflammation of small airways and lung parenchyma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999;160(5 Pt 2):S21–5. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.160.supplement_1.7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Grumelli S, Corry DB, Song LZ, Song L, et al. An immune basis for lung parenchymal destruction in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and emphysema. PLoS Med. 2004;1(1):e8. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0010008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hogg JC, et al. Pathophysiology of airflow limitation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Lancet. 2004;364(9435):709–21. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16900-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Cosio MG, Saetta M, Agusti A, et al. Immunologic aspects of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(23):2445–54. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0804752. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Shan M, You R, Yuan X, Frazier MV, et al. Agonistic induction of PPAR reverses cigarette smoke-induced emphysema. J Clin Invest. 2014;124(3):1371–81. doi: 10.1172/JCI70587. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.You R, Lu W, Shan M, Berlin JM, et al. Nanoparticulate carbon black in cigarette smoke induces DNA cleavage and Th17-mediated emphysema. Elife. 2015;4:e09623. doi: 10.7554/eLife.09623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lu W, You R, Yuan X, Yang T, et al. The microRNA miR-22 inhibits the histone deacetylase HDAC4 to promote T(H)17 cell-dependent emphysema. Nat Immunol. 2015;16(11):1185–94. doi: 10.1038/ni.3292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Starcher BC, et al. Elastin and the lung. Thorax. 1986;41(8):577–85. doi: 10.1136/thx.41.8.577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kucich U, Christner P, Lippmann M, Fein A, et al. Immunologic measurement of elastin-derived peptides in human serum. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1983;127(2) doi: 10.1164/arrd.1983.127.2P2.S28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Chapman HA, Jr, Stone OL, et al. Comparison of live human neutrophil and alveolar macrophage elastolytic activity in vitro. Relative resistance of macrophage elastolytic activity to serum and alveolar proteinase inhibitors. J Clin Invest. 1984;74(5):1693–700. doi: 10.1172/JCI111586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Chapman HA, Jr, Stone OL, Vavrin Z, et al. Degradation of fibrin and elastin by intact human alveolar macrophages in vitro. Characterization of a plasminogen activator and its role in matrix degradation. J Clin Invest. 1984;73(3):806–15. doi: 10.1172/JCI111275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Stockley RA, Mannino D, Barnes PJ, et al. Burden and pathogenesis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2009;6(6):524–6. doi: 10.1513/pats.200904-016DS. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Macnee W, et al. Pathogenesis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Clin Chest Med. 2007;28(3):479–513. doi: 10.1016/j.ccm.2007.06.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Mulgrew AT, Taggart CC, Lawless MW, Greene CM, et al. Z alpha1-antitrypsin polymerizes in the lung and acts as a neutrophil chemoattractant. Chest. 2004;125(5):1952–7. doi: 10.1378/chest.125.5.1952. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Agusti A, Calverley PMA, Celli B, Coxson HO, et al. Characterisation of COPD heterogeneity in the ECLIPSE cohort. Resp Res. 2010;11:122. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-11-122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Labaki WW, Martinez CH, Han MK, et al. COPD in 2016: some answers, more questions. Lancet Respir Med. 2016;4(12):941–3. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(16)30324-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Miller M, Cho JY, Pham A, Friedman PJ, et al. Persistent airway inflammation and emphysema progression on CT scan in ex-smokers observed for 4 years. Chest. 2011;139(6):1380–7. doi: 10.1378/chest.10-0705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Lee S-H, Goswami S, Grudo A, Song LZ, et al. Antielastin autoimmunity in tobacco smoking-induced emphysema. Nat Med. 2007;13(5):567–9. doi: 10.1038/nm1583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Shan M, Cheng HF, Song LZ, Roberts L, et al. Lung myeloid dendritic cells coordinately induce TH1 and TH17 responses in human emphysema. Sci Transl Med. 2009;1(4) doi: 10.1126/scitranlsmed.3000154. 4ra10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Hesselbacher S, Ross R, Schabath M, Smith E, et al. Cross-sectional analysis of the utility of pulmonary function tests in predicting emphysema in ever-smokers. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2011;8(5):1324–40. doi: 10.3390/ijerph8051324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Xu C, Hesselbacher S, Tsai CL, Shan M, et al. Autoreactive T cells in human smokers is predictive of clinical outcome. Front Immunol. 2012;3:267. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2012.00267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Bhavani S, Yuan X, You R, Shan M, et al. Loss of peripheral tolerance in emphysema. Phenotypes, exacerbations, and disease progression. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2015;12(suppl 2):S164–8. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201503-115AW. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Bhavani S, Tsai CL, Perusich S, Hesselbacher S, et al. Clinical and immunological factors in emphysema progression. Five-year prospective Longitudinal Exacerbation Study of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (LES-COPD) Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015;192(10):1171–8. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201504-0736OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Shapiro SD, et al. Transgenic and gene-targeted mice as models for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [review] [26 refs] Eur Resp J. 2007;29(2):375–8. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00087606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Guerassimov A, Hoshino Y, Takubo Y, Turcotte A, et al. The development of emphysema in cigarette smoke-exposed mice is strain dependent [see comment] Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2004;170(9):974–80. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200309-1270OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Hautamaki RD, Kobayashi DK, Senior RM, Shapiro SD, et al. Requirement for macrophage elastase for cigarette smoke-induced emphysema in mice. Science. 1997;277(5334):2002–4. doi: 10.1126/science.277.5334.2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Shapiro SD, Goldstein NM, Houghton AM, Kobayashi DK, et al. Neutrophil elastase contributes to cigarette smoke-induced emphysema in mice. Am J Pathol. 2003;163(6):2329–35. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63589-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Wang Z, Zheng T, Zhu Z, Homer RJ, et al. Interferon gamma induction of pulmonary emphysema in the adult murine lung. J Exp Med. 2000;192(11):1587–600. doi: 10.1084/jem.192.11.1587. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Hoidal JR, Niewoehner DE, et al. Cigarette smoke inhalation potentiates elastase-induced emphysema in hamsters. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1983;127(4):478–81. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1983.127.4.478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Starcher B, Williams I, et al. The beige mouse: role of neutrophil elastase in the development of pulmonary emphysema. Exp Lung Res. 1989;15(5):785–800. doi: 10.3109/01902148909062861. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Maeno T, Houghton AM, Quintero PA, Grumelli S, et al. CD8+ T Cells are required for inflammation and destruction in cigarette smoke-induced emphysema in mice. J Immunol. 2007;178(12):8090–6. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.178.12.8090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Eppert BL, Wortham BW, Flury JL, Borchers MT, et al. Functional characterization of T cell populations in a mouse model of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Immunol. 2013;190(3):1331–40. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1202442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Alcorn JF, Crowe CR, Kolls JK, et al. TH17 cells in asthma and COPD. Ann Rev Physiol. 2009;72:495–516. doi: 10.1146/annurev-physiol-021909-135926. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Korn T, Bettelli E, Oukka M, Kuchroo VK, et al. IL-17 and Th17 Cells. Ann Rev Immunol. 2009;27:485–517. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.021908.132710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Shan M, Yuan X, Song LZ, Roberts L, et al. Cigarette smoke induction of osteopontin (SPP1) mediates T(H)17 inflammation in human and experimental emphysema. Sci Transl Med. 2012;4(117):117ra9. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3003041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Di Stefano A, Caramori G, Gnemmi I, Contoli M, et al. T helper type 17-related cytokine expression is increased in the bronchial mucosa of stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients. Clin Exp Immunol. 2009;157(2):316–24. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2009.03965.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Barczyk A, Pierzchala W, Sozañska E. Interleukin-17 in sputum correlates with airway hyperresponsiveness to methacholine. Resp Med. 2003;97(6):726–33. doi: 10.1053/rmed.2003.1507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Harrison OJ, Foley J, Bolognese BJ, Long E, 3rd, et al. Airway infiltration of CD4+ CCR6+ Th17 type cells associated with chronic cigarette smoke induced airspace enlargement. Immunol Lett. 2008;121(1):13–21. doi: 10.1016/j.imlet.2008.07.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Melgert BN, Timens W, Kerstjens HA, Geerlings M, et al. Effects of 4 months of smoking in mice with ovalbumin-induced airway inflammation. Clin Exp Allergy. 2007;37(12):1798–808. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2007.02843.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Mosmann TR, Cherwinski H, Bond MW, Giedlin MA, et al. Two types of murine helper T cell clone. I. Definition according to profiles of lymphokine activities and secreted proteins. J Immunol. 1986;136(7):2348–57. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Park H, Li Z, Yang XO, Chang SH, et al. A distinct lineage of CD4 T cells regulates tissue inflammation by producing interleukin 17. Nat Immunol. 2005;6(11):1133–41. doi: 10.1038/ni1261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Groux H, O’Garra A, Bigler M, Rouleau M, et al. A CD4+ T-cell subset inhibits antigen-specific T-cell responses and prevents colitis. Nature. 1997;389(6652):737–42. doi: 10.1038/39614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Hogg JC, Chu F, Utokaparch S, Woods R, et al. The nature of small-airway obstruction in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(26):2645–53. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa032158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Majo J, Ghezzo H, Cosio MG, et al. Lymphocyte population and apoptosis in the lungs of smokers and their relation to emphysema. Eur Respir J. 2001;17(5):946–53. doi: 10.1183/09031936.01.17509460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Mitchev K, Dumortier P, De Vuyst P. “Black Spots” and hyaline pleural plaques on the parietal pleura of 150 urban necropsy cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2002;26(9):1198–206. doi: 10.1097/00000478-200209000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Churg A, Myers JL, Tazelaar H, Wright JL, et al. Thurlbeck’s Pathology of the Lung. Third Edition. New York, New York: Thieme; 2005. [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Bhattacharjee S, Nandi S, et al. Choices have consequences: the nexus between DNA repair pathways and genomic instability in cancer. Clin Transl Med. 2016;5(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s40169-016-0128-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Mladenov E, Magin S, Soni A, Iliakis G, et al. DNA double-strand-break repair in higher eukaryotes and its role in genomic instability and cancer: cell cycle and proliferation-dependent regulation. Semin Cancer Biol. 2016:37–38. 51–64. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2016.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Transactions of the American Clinical and Climatological Association are provided here courtesy of American Clinical and Climatological Association

RESOURCES