Skip to main content
Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research logoLink to Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research
. 2017 Jul-Sep;12(3):333–337. doi: 10.4103/jovr.jovr_227_15

Unilateral Keratectasia Treated with Femtosecond Fashioned Intrastromal Corneal Inlay

Khosrow Jadidi 1, Hossein Hasanpour 2,
PMCID: PMC5525504  PMID: 28791068

Abstract

Purpose:

In this case report, we describe the surgical procedure of corneal inlay preparation and corneal pocket creation using a femtosecond laser system.

Case Report:

A 7-year-old girl who presented with unilateral paracentral corneal thinning underwent the surgical procedure of corneal inlay. Preoperatively, the refraction was +10.00-6.00 × 170. One month after the procedure, astigmatism and hyperopia were decreased and the refraction was +5.00-1.25 × 110.

Conclusion:

Femtosecond laser–assisted pocket creation for the implantation of corneal inlays offers accuracy of pocket parameters, enhancing predictability, resulting in better final outcomes, and improving the safety of the procedure.

Keywords: Femtosecond Laser, Keratectasia, Intrastromalcornea Graft

INTRODUCTION

Corneal ectasia represents a group of disorders characterized by an inherent corneal weakness, leading to protrusion and irregular astigmatism resulting in loss of visual acuity, and rarely, perforation. These disorders comprise both primary conditions and secondary or iatrogenic corneal ectasia, which may occur after refractive procedures such as laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and affect a significant number of people.[1]

Two approaches for corneal ectasia management include restoration of vision by optical means to obviate irregular astigmatism, and correction or restoration of tectonic corneal integrity by interventional means. Various treatments have recently emerged, which include methods to increase corneal rigidity, such as collagen cross-linking and the use of intrastromal implants to augment weakened areas of the cornea and reduce astigmatism.

Several human and animal studies have reported the safety and efficacy of inlay procedures to strengthen the cornea. McCarey et al[2] implanted hydrogel intracorneal lenses (lidofilcon A and lidofilcon B; Allergan Medical Optics, Irvine, CA, USA) into the eyes of rhesus monkeys and reported successful results up to 2 years after implantation.

Ismail,[3] Sweeney et al,[4] and Xie et al[5] studied the safety and efficacy of intracorneal lenses in rabbit eyes and reported excellent biocompatibility. Sweeney et al[4] extended this finding to human eyes. Other human studies evaluated visual outcomes of corneal inlay implantation for correction of hyperopia.[6,7] Conversely, other human studies reported the limitations of this procedure, including significant visual loss and scarring,[8] Complications such as intrastromal epithelial opacification,[9] and poor visual and refractive outcomes.[10]

The implantation of corneal inlays for presbyopia or hyperopia has been described using pockets created by mechanical microkeratomes[11,12] or femtosecond lasers.[13,14] We describe corneal inlay implantation in a femtosecond laser–assisted intrastromal pocket for treatment of high astigmatism and hyperopia in a 7-year-old girl who presented with unilateral paracentral corneal thinning.

CASE REPORT

A 7-year-old girl presented with low vision in both eyes; best corrected visual acuity was 1/10 and 2/10 in the right and left eyes, respectively. Refraction was +10.00-6.00 × 170 and +8.00-2.75 × 180 in the right and left eyes, respectively. Slit lamp examination revealed unilateral paracentral corneal thinning and mild subepithelial haze [Figure 1]. A confocal scan revealed the epithelium and endothelium to be unremarkable; mid-stromal nerves were visible, but the subepithelial nerve plexus was not. In the confocal scan, corneal thickness at the involved area of the right eye was 461 μm, and 522 μm at the center of the left cornea. Endothelial cell density was 3,765 cell/mm2 with a mean cell area of 265 μm2 in the right eye and 3,393 cell/mm2 with a mean cell area of 294 μm2 in the left cornea. Non-inflammatory stromal thinning with increased anterior stromal involvement was observed [Figure 2]. A Pentacam (WaveLight Allegro Oculyzer™, WaveLight AG, Erlangen, Germany) showed an asymmetric bowtie pattern with superior steepening and with-the-rule astigmatism. Steepening of the anterior cornea curvature in favor of keratectasia was observed [Figure 3]. The anterior segment was normal, as confirmed by Visante™ OCT (Optical coherence tomography, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Germany) [Figure 4]. Ocular response analysis (ORA) was performed repeatedly, with no remarkable result.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Slit lamp photograph of the right eye, diffuse illumination (right) and slit illumination (left) showing a disc of cornea thinning located in the paracentral and inferior cornea.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Confocal scan image of the right eye (left) and left eye (right) reveals normal endothelium (shape, size).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Front and back cornea elevation analysis with cornea thickness map and pentacam analysis: right eye (left) and left eye (right). Maximum central cornea curvature was 50.4 diopter at 176° axis. Corneal thickness was 538 μm centrally and 338 μm inferiorly.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Visante™ OCT of the right eye reveals a normal anterior segment, with the exception of corneal thinning. Anterior protrusion of the cornea is visible.

The surgical procedure was performed under general anesthesia. Donor cornea preparation was performed using a femtosecond laser system (FEMTO LDV Da Vinci™, Ziemer Ophthalmic Systems AG, Port, Switzerland). First, a whole globe was fixed in an artificial chamber, and pressure was increased to approximately 60 mmHg, as measured using a sterile Tonopen (Applanation Tonometer, Reichert, Inc. USA). The epithelium was removed and an 8.00-mm suction ring was inserted. The laser wavelength, pulse width, and spot size were 1,045 ± 10 nm, 250 fs ± 10%, and <2 μm with overlapping, respectively. Maximum pulse energy and pulse rate were 45 ± 5 nJ and 20.9 MHz, respectively. Donor thickness and diameter were 200 μm and 8.00 mm, respectively [Figure 5]. A normal cornea has a thickness of 540 μm and a thinnest point of 340 μm; the difference between these values was used for donor preparation. The inlay was removed from the remaining stroma using a special separator. A pocket was created in the recipient's cornea at a 150-μm depth with a diameter of 9.50 mm in the same way, with no manipulation of the epithelium. The diameter of the suction ring was 9.50 mm. The pocket was opened in the direction of the 2.00-mm incision using a special separator [Figure 6]. The anterior side-cut segment was placed on the steep meridian (80°). The inlay was inserted manually into the pocket and unfolded. A soft bandage contact lens was inserted, and was removed the next day. Laser parameters are shown in Table 1.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Donor preparation using the femtosecond-assisted approach. A whole globe was fixed in an artificial chamber. First, the epithelium was removed. With the lamellar keratoplasty method, an inlay with a diameter of 8.00 mm and thickness of 200 μm was prepared (a-c).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Femtoscond-assisted pocket creation. A central pocket with a diameter of 9.50 mm and depth of 150 μm was prepared. The corneal inlay was inserted into the pocket using a spatula. The incision was secured with no sutures (a-d).

Table 1.

Femtosecond laser parameters for pocket creation

graphic file with name JOVR-12-333-g007.jpg

One month after the procedure, the astigmatism and hyperopia had decreased and the refraction was + 5.00-1.25 × 110. Uncorrected distance visual acuity (2/10) was unchanged due to amblyopia. Corneal thickness was 552 μm centrally and 378 μm inferiorly based on Orbscan images. Endothelial cell count was 3,700 cell/mm2 on confocal scan; no signs of corneal inflammation or haze were observed on slit-lamp examination over 1 month of follow-up. The inlay altered corneal curvature, and central maximum keratometric power was decreased from 50.4 to 48.1 diopters [Figure 7]. The corneal inlay was inserted in the stroma without any shrinkage or wrinkling in an appropriate location as shown by Visante™ OCT [Figure 8]. Intraocular pressure (IOP) was 14.00 mmHg during the operation and 18.00 mmHg postoperatively, as measured by the Tonopen.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Postoperative Orbscan imaging reveals improvement of keratometric and thickness numeric data. Maximum central keratometric power is 48.1@54°. Corneal thickness was 552 μm centrally and 378 μm inferiorly as measured by Orbscan.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Postoperative Visante OCT. The corneal inlay was inserted in the stroma. Corneal thickness measurement is visible.

DISCUSSION

The femtosecond laser was commercially introduced in 2002 for creation of corneal flaps during laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK), and currently has numerous surgical uses, including creation of anterior corneal flaps in LASIK surgery, lamellar dissections in anterior lamellar keratoplasty (ALK), corneal pockets for Intacs insertion, donor tissue preparation in Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty, and arcuate wedge-shaped resection for correction of high residual astigmatism. This technology is now able to create full-thickness corneal incisions with customized graft-edge profiles for both donor and recipient corneas to perform femtosecond laser-assisted keratoplasty (FLAK).

However, no studies have reported femtosecond -assisted intrastromal cornea inlays in humans. This approach entails advantages including augmentation of cornea hysteresis and resistance, performance under local anesthesia, and no manipulation of the epithelium or endothelium, leading to a decreased rate of rejection.

Similarly, the procedure of intracorneal pocket formation is less invasive compared to lamellar or penetrating keratoplasty. Larrea et al[15] reported the ideal position of three-fourths of the corneal thickness for the inlay to be implanted within the cornea to provide an optimal nutrient supply to the corneal cells. As a corneal inlay has sufficient oxygen and nutrient diffusion, it has no impact on these parameters.

Michieletto et al[6] and Guell et al[7] reported acceptable visual results by achieving target refraction within ±0.50 diopters of emmetropia at 6 months and up to 12 months postoperatively, respectively. In contrast, Verity et al[10] reported less than satisfactory visual and refractive outcomes in more than half of the enrolled subjects. The Perma-Vision intracorneal lenses were used in these studies to correct hyperopia. With the development of haze around the implant and slight thinning of the epithelial layer, it was concluded that insufficient nutrient transfer through the cornea might still be a problem with this procedure. Therefore, haze formation may occur in our patient in further follow-up.

Femtosecond laser–assisted pocket creation for the implantation of corneal inlays offers accuracy of pocket parameters, enhancing predictability, resulting in better final outcomes, and improving the safety of the procedure. It also provides new treatment options. Prospective, comparative studies are needed to evaluate the long-term results of the technique and optimize the procedure.

Financial Support and Sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of Interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Rabinowitz YS. Keratoconus. SurvOphthalmol. 1998;42:297–319. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6257(97)00119-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.McCarey BE, McDonald MB, van Rij G, Salmeron B, Pettit DK, Knight PM. Refractive results of hyperopic hydrogel intracorneal lenses in primate eyes. Arch Ophthalmol. 1989;107(5):724–730. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1989.01070010742038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ismail MM. Correction of hyperopia with intracorneal implants. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28:527–530. doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(01)01128-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sweeney DF, Vannas A, Hughes TC, Evans MD, McLean KM, Xie RZ, Pravin VK, Prakasam RK Vision CRC Inlay Team. Synthetic corneal inlays. Clin ExpOptom. 2008;91:56–66. doi: 10.1111/j.1444-0938.2007.00198.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Xie RZ, Evans MD, Bojarski B, Hughes TC, Chan GY, Nguyen X, Wilkie JS, McLean KM, Vannas A, Sweeney DF. Two-year preclinical testing of perfluoropolyether polymer as a corneal inlay. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:574–581. doi: 10.1167/iovs.05-0872. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Michieletto P, Ligabue E, Balestrazzi A, Balestrazzi A, Giglio S. PermaVisionintracorneal lens for the correction of hyperopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30:2152–2157. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.02.093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Güell JL, Velasco F, Guerrero E, Gris O, Pujol J. Confocal microscopy of corneas with an intracorneal lens for hyperopia. J Refract Surg. 2004;20:778–782. doi: 10.3928/1081-597X-20041101-04. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Mulet ME, Alio JL, Knorz MC. Hydrogel intracorneal inlays for the correction of hyperopia: Outcomes and complications after 5 years of follow-up. Ophthalmology. 2009;116:1455–1460. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.05.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Alió JL, Mulet ME, Zapata LF, Vidal MT, De Rojas V, Javaloy J. Intracorneal inlay complicated by intrastromal epithelial opacification. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122:1441–1446. doi: 10.1001/archopht.122.10.1441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Verity SM, McCulley JP, Bowman RW, Cavanagh HD, Petroll WM. Outcomes of PermaVisionintracorneal implants for the correction of hyperopia. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;147:973–977. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2008.12.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Yilmaz OF, Bayraktar S, Agca A, Yilmaz B, McDonald MB, van de Pol C. Intracorneal inlay for the surgical correction of presbyopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34(11):1921–1927. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.07.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Mulet ME, Alio JL, Knorz MC. Hydrogel intracorneal inlays for the correction of hyperopia: Outcomes and complications after 5 years of follow-up. Ophthalmology. 2009;116(8):1455–1466. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.05.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Seyeddain O, Riha W, Hohensinn M, Nix G, Dexl AK, Grabner G. Refractive surgical correction of presbyopia with the AcuFocus small aperture corneal inlay: Two-year follow-up. J Refract Surg. 2010;26(10):707–715. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20100408-01. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Verity SM, McCulley JP, Bowman RW, Cavanagh HD, Petroll WM. Outcomes of PermaVisionintracorneal implants for the correction of hyperopia. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;147(6):973–977. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2008.12.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Larrea X, De Courten C, Feingold V, Burger J, Büchler P. Oxygen and glucose distribution after intracorneal lens implantation. Optom Vis Sci. 2007;84:1074–1081. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e31815b9dd6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research are provided here courtesy of Ophthalmic Research Center

RESOURCES