Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jul 25.
Published in final edited form as: Receptors Clin Investig. 2017 May 24;4(1):e1544. doi: 10.14800/rci.1544

An entry-competent intermediate state of the HIV-1 envelope glycoproteins

Alon Herschhorn 1,2, Joseph Sodroski 1,2,3
PMCID: PMC5526225  NIHMSID: NIHMS883016  PMID: 28752105

Abstract

The human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) envelope glycoproteins (Env) mediate viral entry and are the sole target of neutralizing antibodies. Recent studies show that the metastable HIV-1 Env trimer can transit among three conformational states: State 1, State 3, and State 2, corresponding to the “closed”, “open” and intermediate conformations, respectively. During virus entry, binding to the CD4 receptor drives Env from state 1 to state 3. In the unliganded Env, transitions from the closed (State 1) conformation are restrained by intramolecular interactions among different Env residues, which regulate HIV-1 Env conformation. Releasing the specific restraints on State 1 Env leads to increased occupancy of State 2, which is a functional conformation on the entry pathway and an obligate intermediate between State 1 and State 3. Frequent sampling of intermediate State 2 allows HIV-1 to infect cells expressing low levels of CD4, and leads to resistance to several broadly neutralizing antibodies as well as small-molecule inhibitors. Recent findings provide new mechanistic insights into the function and inhibition of HIV-1 Env and will contribute to the development of new therapeutic and prophylactic interventions to combat HIV-1.

Keywords: HIV-1, envelope glycoproteins, intermediate states, conformation

The human immunodeficiency virus type-1 envelope glycoproteins

Approximately 36.7 million people are infected with the human immunodeficiency virus type I (HIV-1) worldwide (www.who.int). Current antiretroviral treatment is effective and reduces viremia to undetectable levels in most patients, significantly decreasing the mortality and morbidity of infected individuals. Nevertheless, the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) epidemic is stably sustained by ∼2 million new infections each year, mainly because a curative treatment and/or an effective vaccine for HIV-1 prevention are not yet available. New approaches are currently being explored to allow detailed understanding of the latent reservoir of HIV-1 in infected individuals [1] to develop broadly neutralizing antibodies as preventive and therapeutic modalities [2]; and to devise novel approaches to address HIV-1 persistence and allow long-term control of the virus without the need for antiretroviral drugs [3].

HIV-1 entry is mediated by the interaction of the HIV-1 envelope glycoproteins (Env) with the CD4 receptor and CCR5/CXCR4 coreceptor. Three gp120 exterior subunits are noncovalently associated with three gp41 transmembrane subunits to form the HIV-1 Env trimer [4, 5], and there are approximately 10-14 trimeric spikes on each HIV-1 virion. The low number of spikes and Env conformational dynamics are important for the maintenance of a delicate balance between the requirements to interact with host receptors and the necessity to avoid neutralizing antibodies. Each subunit is associated with specific activity: the gp120 subunit recognizes the host receptors and gp41 facilitates membrane fusion. Binding of gp120 to the CD4 receptor induces the transition of Env from a metastable, high-potential energy state to downstream conformations. CD4-induced Env transitions lead to extensive structural rearrangements that include a repositioning of the V1/V2 and V3 loops, formation of the bridging sheet and coreceptor binding site, and formation/exposure of gp41 heptad repeat (HR1) coiled coil [6-18]. Subsequent binding to the CCR5 or CXCR4 coreceptor promotes the formation of a stable gp41 six-helix bundle, composed of the HR1 and HR2 heptad repeats, a process that is thought to drive the fusion of the viral and host cell membranes [19-23].

Conformational transitions of HIV-1 Env

Structural studies of the HIV-1 Env trimer on the surface of virions revealed that the unliganded Env trimer adopts a closed conformation, in which the variable loops protect the internal regions from the immune system and premature activation [24]. Numerous reports have documented the ability of amino acid changes in different Env domains to alter Env sensitivity to cold, antibodies and entry inhibitors [25-30]. These amino acid changes affect the propensity of the Env to sample downstream conformations, a property termed intrinsic reactivity [27]. These observations support the concept that the native, unliganded Env trimer of primary HIV-1 strains is metastable and only infrequently samples downstream conformations [31].

Recent biophysical and biochemical studies now lay a new groundwork for understanding the function and inhibition of HIV-1 Env [32, 33]. The HIV-1 Env trimer, either unliganded or in response to CD4 binding, transits between three states: State 1, State 2, and State 3 (Figure 1). The Env of primary isolates like HIV-1JR-FL predominantly occupies the “closed” State 1 conformation. State 3 represents the CD4-bound conformation and is significantly stabilized by incubation of the Env with soluble CD4 and 17b, an antibody that recognizes the coreceptor binding site [33]. The identity and functional significance of State 2, which resulted in a high-FRET signal in single-molecule fluorescence resonance energy transfer (smFRET) studies, was initially unknown. Later studies identified State 2 as a functional intermediate by linking the increased occupancy of State 2 with hypersensitivity to various ligands that recognize downstream conformations [32]. In particular, hydrophilic changes in Leucine 193 in the V1/V2 loop, which forms the trimer apex, resulted in the release of restraints that maintain a State 1 Env conformation and increased the occupancy of State 2. Further analysis of the trajectory between State 1 and State 3 revealed that all transitions must occur through the intermediate State 2. The results allowed a description of the energy landscape of HIV-1 Env and showed that both CD4 binding and changes in control points that release State-1-restraints lower the activation energy between State 1 and downstream conformations. However, there may be some differences in how the two stimuli induce downstream conformations of Env. The release of State-1-restaints is associated with multiple different Env residue changes, suggesting that the effect of these changes is mainly due to destabilizing State 1. CD4 binding may also destabilize State 1 to some extent. The high degree of enthalpy and entropy change associated with CD4 binding suggests that, in addition, a State 3 Env conformation is stabilized by the interaction with CD4. Integration of these concepts allows an improved understanding of HIV-1 Env function. The Env trimer is metastable and contains several control points that maintain a State 1 conformation; changing these points or binding to the CD4 receptor shifts the distribution of Env conformations among the three defined states (State 1, State 2, and State 3) and increases the occupancy of downstream conformations (State 2 and State 3). This process takes advantage of the natural tendency of the unrestrained gp120 core to assume the CD4-bound (State 3) conformation [31].

Figure 1. HIV-1 Env conformational states relevant to virus entry.

Figure 1

The unliganded mature HIV-1 Env trimer is primarily in State 1, a “closed” conformation resistant to neutralization by antibodies. Binding to the receptor, CD4, drives Env into State 2, an intermediate, partially open conformation. Env can also transit into State 2 by modification of gp120 or gp41 residues that restrain the Env trimer in State 1. These State 2 viruses can use low levels of CD4 to enter cells, but exhibit increased sensitivity to antibody neutralization. Additional binding of CD4 to the State 2 Env forms the prehairpin intermediate, an “open” conformation that can bind the second receptor, CCR5. CCR5 binding is thought to promote the formation of a stable six-helix bundle in gp41, driving the fusion of the viral and target cell membranes.

Conformational dynamics of HIV-1 Env allow adaptability to different host environments

The ability of HIV-1 Env to transit to State 2 provided new insights into the biology of infection of different target cells under physiological conditions. Frequent sampling of State 2 allows more efficient infection of cells that express low levels of the CD4 receptor on their surface. Such a property is a significant advantage for infection of primary macrophages and CD4+ T cells that express low levels of CD4. However, because “open” or partially “open” Env conformations are susceptible to neutralization by many antibodies present in the serum of HIV-1-infected individuals, it is likely that viral tropism (towards macrophages and low-level CD4+ T cells) is further shaped by additional physiological constraints in vivo.

The ability to manipulate the conformational state of HIV-1 Env provided new opportunities to define the selectivity of broadly neutralizing antibodies (bNAbs). These antibodies are elicited in a minority of HIV-1-infected individuals after a long period of infection, and are considered central to vaccine development. In general, this analysis indicated that bNAb selectivity is associated with specific Env epitopes. The bNAbs targeting the gp120 CD4-binding site and the quaternary V1/V2 loop exhibit preferences for State 1 Env. In contrast, anti-gp41 antibodies that target the membrane proximal external region show a high preference for downstream conformations (State 2 and State 3). These observations will provide further guidance to future design of new immunogens.

Variation in or near several gp120 restraining residues can influence the propensity of HIV-1 Env to sample downstream conformations. Envs from natural HIV-1 isolates exhibit a continuum of Env reactivities [27, 34]. Recognition of State 2 as a functional intermediate raises the possibility that these phenotypes of primary HIV-1 variants are determined by differences in the Env energy landscape. We suggest that variation in Env reactivity among primary HIV-1 viruses potentially reflects altered activation barriers between State 1 and State 2, modulating the degree of sampling of State 2. For viruses with some increase in Env reactivity, the consequent disadvantage of increased susceptibility to neutralization by commonly elicited antibodies may be balanced by the ability to evade State 1-recognizing antibodies like the CD4-binding site and quaternary V1/V2 bNAbs and to trigger the entry process with lower levels of target cell CD4. Thus, variation in the propensity to sample downstream states in different HIV-1 strains augments the ability of the virus to adapt to different target cells and to avoid humoral immune responses.

Future research

The identification of different Env residue changes that result in varied propensity to sample downstream conformations raises the possibility that additional substates may exist. Indeed, we expect that new advances in smFRET technology, which is used to study the conformational dynamics of HIV-1 Env, will allow high-resolution analysis and facilitate the detection and mapping of substates on the entry pathway of HIV-1. Advanced studies may link the energetic profile of different primary isolates to their infectivity and neutralization properties. The identification of restraining residues that maintain State 1 provides new tools to study the regulation of HIV-1 function and to trap the Env in intermediate states for structural studies. Understanding the molecular mechanism of HIV-1 Env function will provide new approaches to design immunogens and expedite the development of an effective HIV-1 vaccine.

Acknowledgments

A.H. is the recipient of an amfAR Mathilde Krim Fellowship in Basic Biomedical Research (108501-53-RKNT) and was also supported by a phase II amfAR research grant (109285-58-RKVA) for independent investigators. Support for this work was also provided by grants AI24755, GM56550, and AI100645 from the NIH to J.S.

Abbreviations

HIV-1

human immunodeficiency virus type I

AIDS

acquired immunodeficiency syndrome

Env

envelope glycoproteins

smFRET

single-molecule fluorescence resonance energy transfer

bNAbs

broadly neutralizing antibodies

Footnotes

Conflicting interests: The authors have declared that no conflict of interests exist.

Author contributions: A.H. and J.S. wrote and approved the final manuscript.

References

  • 1.Ho YC, Shan L, Hosmane NN, Wang J, Laskey SB, Rosenbloom DI, et al. Replication-competent noninduced proviruses in the latent reservoir increase barrier to HIV-1 cure. Cell. 2013;155:540–551. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.09.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bonsignori M, Zhou T, Sheng Z, Chen L, Gao F, Joyce MG, et al. Maturation Pathway from Germline to Broad HIV-1 Neutralizer of a CD4-Mimic Antibody. Cell. 2016;165:449–463. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.02.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Byrareddy SN, Arthos J, Cicala C, Villinger F, Ortiz KT, Little D, et al. Sustained virologic control in SIV+ macaques after antiretroviral and alpha4beta7 antibody therapy. Science. 2016;354:197–202. doi: 10.1126/science.aag1276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Allan JS, Coligan JE, Barin F, McLane MF, Sodroski JG, Rosen CA, et al. Major glycoprotein antigens that induce antibodies in AIDS patients are encoded by HTLV-III. Science. 1985;228:1091–1094. doi: 10.1126/science.2986290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wyatt R, Kwong PD, Desjardins E, Sweet RW, Robinson J, Hendrickson WA, et al. The antigenic structure of the HIV gp120 envelope glycoprotein. Nature. 1998;393:705–711. doi: 10.1038/31514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Alkhatib G, Combadiere C, Broder CC, Feng Y, Kennedy PE, Murphy PM, et al. CC CKR5: a RANTES, MIP-1alpha, MIP-1beta receptor as a fusion cofactor for macrophage-tropic HIV-1. Science. 1996;272:1955–1958. doi: 10.1126/science.272.5270.1955. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Choe H, Farzan M, Sun Y, Sullivan N, Rollins B, Ponath PD, et al. The beta-chemokine receptors CCR3 and CCR5 facilitate infection by primary HIV-1 isolates. Cell. 1996;85:1135–1148. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81313-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Deng H, Liu R, Ellmeier W, Choe S, Unutmaz D, Burkhart M, et al. Identification of a major co-receptor for primary isolates of HIV-1. Nature. 1996;381:661–666. doi: 10.1038/381661a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Doranz BJ, Rucker J, Yi Y, Smyth RJ, Samson M, Peiper SC, et al. A dual-tropic primary HIV-1 isolate that uses fusin and the beta-chemokine receptors CKR-5, CKR-3, and CKR-2b as fusion cofactors. Cell. 1996;85:1149–1158. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81314-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Dragic T, Litwin V, Allaway GP, Martin SR, Huang Y, Nagashima KA, et al. HIV-1 entry into CD4+ cells is mediated by the chemokine receptor CC-CKR-5. Nature. 1996;381:667–673. doi: 10.1038/381667a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Feng Y, Broder CC, Kennedy PE, Berger EA. HIV-1 entry cofactor: functional cDNA cloning of a seven-transmembrane, G protein-coupled receptor. Science. 1996;272:872–877. doi: 10.1126/science.272.5263.872. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Trkola A, Dragic T, Arthos J, Binley JM, Olson WC, Allaway GP, et al. CD4-dependent, antibody-sensitive interactions between HIV-1 and its co-receptor CCR-5. Nature. 1996;384:184–187. doi: 10.1038/384184a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wu L, Gerard NP, Wyatt R, Choe H, Parolin C, Ruffing N, et al. CD4-induced interaction of primary HIV-1 gp120 glycoproteins with the chemokine receptor CCR-5. Nature. 1996;384:179–183. doi: 10.1038/384179a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kwong PD, Wyatt R, Robinson J, Sweet RW, Sodroski J, Hendrickson WA. Structure of an HIV gp120 envelope glycoprotein in complex with the CD4 receptor and a neutralizing human antibody. Nature. 1998;393:648–659. doi: 10.1038/31405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Furuta RA, Wild CT, Weng Y, Weiss CD. Capture of an early fusion-active conformation of HIV-1 gp41. Nature structural biology. 1998;5:276–279. doi: 10.1038/nsb0498-276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.He Y, Vassell R, Zaitseva M, Nguyen N, Yang Z, Weng Y, et al. Peptides trap the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 envelope glycoprotein fusion intermediate at two sites. J Virol. 2003;77:1666–1671. doi: 10.1128/JVI.77.3.1666-1671.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Koshiba T, Chan DC. The prefusogenic intermediate of HIV-1 gp41 contains exposed C-peptide regions. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:7573–7579. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M211154200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Si Z, Madani N, Cox JM, Chruma JJ, Klein JC, Schon A, et al. Small-molecule inhibitors of HIV-1 entry block receptor-induced conformational changes in the viral envelope glycoproteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:5036–5041. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0307953101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lu M, Blacklow SC, Kim PS. A trimeric structural domain of the HIV-1 transmembrane glycoprotein. Nature structural biology. 1995;2:1075–1082. doi: 10.1038/nsb1295-1075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Chan DC, Fass D, Berger JM, Kim PS. Core structure of gp41 from the HIV envelope glycoprotein. Cell. 1997;89:263–273. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80205-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Tan K, Liu J, Wang J, Shen S, Lu M. Atomic structure of a thermostable subdomain of HIV-1 gp41. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997;94:12303–12308. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.23.12303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Weissenhorn W, Dessen A, Harrison SC, Skehel JJ, Wiley DC. Atomic structure of the ectodomain from HIV-1 gp41. Nature. 1997;387:426–430. doi: 10.1038/387426a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Melikyan GB, Markosyan RM, Hemmati H, Delmedico MK, Lambert DM, Cohen FS. Evidence that the transition of HIV-1 gp41 into a six-helix bundle, not the bundle configuration, induces membrane fusion. The Journal of cell biology. 2000;151:413–423. doi: 10.1083/jcb.151.2.413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Liu J, Bartesaghi A, Borgnia MJ, Sapiro G, Subramaniam S. Molecular architecture of native HIV-1 gp120 trimers. Nature. 2008;455:109–113. doi: 10.1038/nature07159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Duenas-Decamp M, Jiang L, Bolon D, Clapham PR. Saturation Mutagenesis of the HIV-1 Envelope CD4 Binding Loop Reveals Residues Controlling Distinct Trimer Conformations. PLoS Pathog. 2016;12:e1005988. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Finzi A, Xiang SH, Pacheco B, Wang L, Haight J, Kassa A, et al. Topological layers in the HIV-1 gp120 inner domain regulate gp41 interaction and CD4-triggered conformational transitions. Mol Cell. 2010;37:656–667. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.02.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Haim H, Strack B, Kassa A, Madani N, Wang L, Courter JR, et al. Contribution of intrinsic reactivity of the HIV-1 envelope glycoproteins to CD4-independent infection and global inhibitor sensitivity. PLoS Pathog. 2011;7:e1002101. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Herschhorn A, Gu C, Espy N, Richard J, Finzi A, Sodroski JG. A broad HIV-1 inhibitor blocks envelope glycoprotein transitions critical for entry. Nat Chem Biol. 2014;10:845–852. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.1623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kassa A, Madani N, Schon A, Haim H, Finzi A, Xiang SH, et al. Transitions to and from the CD4-bound conformation are modulated by a single-residue change in the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 gp120 inner domain. J Virol. 2009;83:8364–8378. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00594-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.McGee K, Haim H, Korioth-Schmitz B, Espy N, Javanbakht H, Letvin N, et al. The selection of low envelope glycoprotein reactivity to soluble CD4 and cold during simian-human immunodeficiency virus infection of rhesus macaques. J Virol. 2014;88:21–40. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01558-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kwon YD, Finzi A, Wu X, Dogo-Isonagie C, Lee LK, Moore LR, et al. Unliganded HIV-1 gp120 core structures assume the CD4-bound conformation with regulation by quaternary interactions and variable loops. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:5663–5668. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1112391109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Herschhorn A, Ma X, Gu C, Ventura JD, Castillo-Menendez L, Melillo B, et al. Release of gp120 Restraints Leads to an Entry-Competent Intermediate State of the HIV-1 Envelope Glycoproteins. mBio. 2016;7 doi: 10.1128/mBio.01598-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Munro JB, Gorman J, Ma X, Zhou Z, Arthos J, Burton DR, et al. Conformational dynamics of single HIV-1 envelope trimers on the surface of native virions. Science. 2014;346:759–763. doi: 10.1126/science.1254426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Hraber P, Korber BT, Lapedes AS, Bailer RT, Seaman MS, Gao H, et al. Impact of clade, geography, and age of the epidemic on HIV-1 neutralization by antibodies. J Virol. 2014;88:12623–12643. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01705-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES